The Holy Roman Empire was the First German Reich
At the height of the Roman Empire the Mediterranean Sea was a Roman Lake. For the Romans controlled all the land around the Mediterranean Sea. As the Roman Empire controlled most of the civilized world. From Africa to Britain. From Spain to the Middle East. And its presence in Europe would shape Europe and the world we know today. But before the Romans could shape our world the barbarians had to destroy theirs.
The northern frontier of the Roman Empire ran along the Rhine and Danube rivers. West of the Rhine and south of the Danube was the civilized Roman Empire. On the other side of those rivers were the Ostrogoths, the Visogoths and the Vandals. Barbarians. Germanic people. Who would sweep down (along with the Huns from Central Asia) and conquer the Western Roman Empire. With a Germanic chieftain, Odoacer, deposing the last Roman emperor in the West. Romulus Augustus.
After about 3 centuries Charlemagne, King of the Franks (Germanic tribes in and around modern day France), would unify Western Europe. In a Christian kingdom. Pleasing Pope Leo III. Who went on to crown Charlemagne emperor of the Roman Empire. But after he died his empire broke apart. Meanwhile to the east Otto I was unifying the Germanic tribes into a single kingdom. A German empire that stretched from northern Italy to the North and Baltic seas. Encompassing a huge swathe of Central Europe (including but not limited to modern day Germany, Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, The Netherlands, Switzerland, France (eastern lands), Italy and Poland). A Christian empire. Pleasing Pope John XII. Who crowned Otto emperor. And the First Reich (the first German empire) became the Holy Roman Empire.
Winning the Franco-Prussian War ushered in the Second German Reich
The First Reich would last for about 850 years. Coming to an end in 1806 when the last Holy Roman Emperor, Francis II, abdicated after fighting and losing to Napoleon. Who reorganize it into the German Confederation. And reduced the First Reich to a French satellite. Up until this time there were two large powers in the Reich vying for power. Austria in the south. And Prussia in the north. Otto von Bismarck was a Prussian. And Prussia was a militaristic nation. That believed less in diplomacy and more in power. And Bismarck would use force to unite the German states into a Prussian-dominated Germany. While getting rid of its rival. Austria.
War followed. The Austro-Prussian War (1866) ended the German Confederation. Prussia replaced the German Confederation with North German Confederation that excluded Austria. This confederation included much of the northern lands of the First Reich. To sooth the feelings between the north (led by Prussia) and the south (led by Austria) Bismarck made the French declare war on Prussia. And when they did the southern German states sided with Prussia. The Prussians and Germans moved quickly into northern France. And after a long siege of Paris the Germans won the Franco-Prussian War (1870-1871). They took back a lot of lands lost to France. Including Alsace-Lorraine. Much to the chagrin of the French. And unified the German states into a German Empire. The Second Reich.
The German Empire industrialized. Greatly increasing its economic and military might. Shifting the balance of power in Europe. Germany was now the most powerful nation in Europe. Which concerned the other powers of Europe. So they began to enter treaties with each other. Such that if Germany attacked one nation another nation (or nations) would declare war on Germany. To provide a deterrent against German aggression. And rebalance the balance of power in Europe. But then Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria, heir to the Austro-Hungarian throne, traveled to Sarajevo. Where Gavrilo Princip assassinated him. Pushing the first domino in a sting of dominos to fall as all of Europe honored their treaties.
The Third Reich was the Largest and Shortest-Lived German Reich
Austria-Hungary invaded Serbia. In support of Austria-Hungary Germany invaded Belgium and Luxembourg on their way to France. Causing the United Kingdom to declare war on Germany. In support of Serbia Russia declared war on Austria-Hungary. Allying with France and the United Kingdom. The Ottoman Empire declared war on Russia. Then nation after nation joined a side and entered the war. Even the United States. By the time it was all over some 16 million people were dead. As were the Russian, Austro-Hungarian, Ottoman and German empires. The map of Europe changed. And the Second Reich was over. Having lasted 47 years. Large chunks of the Second Reich were taken away. Including Alsace-Lorraine. And much of Prussia. Which was restored to Poland. Which infuriated a lot of Germans. Especially one German war veteran in particular. A corporal. Adolf Hitler.
World War I ended in an armistice. Meaning that no one surrendered. But the American entry into the war pretty much meant that the Germans were going to lose. All the nations had long grown weary of the war. But here was a fresh nation that could field fresh troops against Germany. Which was exhausted. It had nothing left. Which gave the Allies the upper hand in the peace that followed. And it was a bitter peace for the Germans. Who were singled out as the sole responsible party for the war. Well, one thing led to another and Adolf Hitler inaugurated the Third Reich. And he set about retrieving all that lost German territory. He annexed Austria. The Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia. Then he took the rest of Czechoslovakia. A country that conveniently ran along the southern border of Poland. And then he kicked off World War II.
The Third Reich invaded Poland. Norway. The Low Countries. France. And the Soviet Union (the former Russian Empire). Reclaiming all lost German lands. Including Alsace-Lorraine. And unifying them once again. Even adding on to them. Through the use of force. The Prussian way. The Third Reich was the largest German Reich yet. But it was the shortest lived Reich. Lasting only 12 years. By the time World War II was over some 70 million people were dead. Making the Third Reich the bloodiest Reich. The Allies helped to rebuild West Germany (East Germany was behind the Iron Curtain) to keep her out of the Soviet Sphere. To give it a thriving free market economy. And prosperity. By providing full employment. Which also helped to prevent gangs of unemployed young men from getting nationalistic fervor. Again. West Germany integrated into the west. Away from the Soviets. And away from her Prussian past.
Tags: Adolf Hitler, Alsace-Lorraine, Austria, Austria-Hungary, balance of power, barbarians, Bismarck, Central Europe, Charlemagne, Christian, Czechoslovakia, Danube, Europe, First Reich, France, Franco-Prussian War, German Confederation, German empire, German Reich, German states, Germanic, Germanic people, Germanic tribes, Germany, Hitler, Holy Roman Empire, Otto, Ottoman Empire, Poland, Prussia, Rhine, Roman, Roman Empire, Russia, Second Reich, Third Reich, United Kingdom, West Germany, World War I, World War II
(Originally published January 21st, 2013)
The Population Growth Rate fell during the Sixties and Seventies from 19% to 11% due to Birth Control and Abortion
Taxpayers are born. Yes, immigration helped populate America. But it was really the children of immigrants that made the country grow. For a large population having babies will increase the population far more than immigration can. Why? Where do immigrants come from? Babies. Having babies is like compounding interest. For babies grow up and have babies of their own. So babies are good. Especially for a government that wants to spend money. Because the more babies we have the more taxpayers we will have. So high-spending governments need a growing population growth rate. To provide ever more taxpayers. Who provide ever more tax revenue. But sometimes the population growth rate doesn’t always increase. Sometimes it even falls. (See Population, Housing Units, Area Measurements, and Density: 1790 to 1990. The population numbers are from the decennial census numbers. The population growth rate is the percentage of population growth from one decade to the next.)
Although the population has always grown the population growth rate has not always grown. In fact, the rate of growth has been falling over time. Taking steep declines during war. During the American Civil War the growth rate fell from 36% down to 23% by the time of the next census. The census before and after World War I saw a decline from 21% to 15%. The rate plummeted from 16% to 7% before and after the Great Depression. With so many people out of work and struggling to survive the last thing families needed was another baby to feed. The rate actually increased during World War II. But that had more to do with people not having babies during the Great Depression for economic reasons. After World War II the rate rose to 14%. Which was still a point less than after World War I.
The following table shows the decrease in population due to war. (Raw numbers are pulled from United States military casualties of war.)
Note that the most devastating of American wars was the American Civil War. Where approximately 2% of the population died. In terms of percentage loss of population the next costliest war was the Revolutionary War. Then World War II. Then World War I. These wars saw millions of men in uniform (except for the Revolutionary War). Away from their wives for years. Which put a crimp in baby making. And the large number of wounded and dead compounded that problem. Resulting in large dips in the population growth rate during these wars. Despite the large loss of life in numbers of America’s other wars those losses were all less than 0.10% of the population. Making the impact on the population growth rate negligible. One thing these numbers don’t explain, though, is the decline in the population growth rate after 1960. During the Sixties and the Seventies the growth rate fell from 19% down to 11%. But it wasn’t the Vietnam War that caused that decline. So what did? Birth control. And abortion.
Couples having only 2 Children can’t Support an Expanding Welfare State but Couples having 3 Children Can
The U.S. approved the sale of the birth control pill in 1960. Which corresponded with the era of free love and the sexual revolution. People were having more sex. While having fewer babies. Then Roe v. Wade made abortion legal in 1973. Since then there have been on average about 1.4 million abortions a year. Dwarfing the 156,250 killed a year in America’s most devastating war. The American Civil War. Which has brought the population growth rate to its smallest numbers that weren’t due to war or depression. Because of that compounding nature of babies (growing up to have babies of their own). And because babies become taxpayers this has a big impact on future tax revenue. We can see this by looking at how 100 abortions ripple through the population.
Let’s assume those 100 abortions happen in Year 1 (Y1). Had these abortions not happened these babies would have grown up and entered the workforce about 20 years later (Y1+20). And split off into pairs to have babies of their own. (If each couple has one baby they have a total of 50 babies. If each couple has two babies they have a total of 100 babies. Etc.) Who would grow up and enter the workforce about 20 years later (Y1+40). And so on. The above graph adds up all the people for each 20-year period produced by the Y1 babies (children, grandchildren, great grand children, etc.) divided by 100 (those original babies not aborted).
If the Y1 people only have one baby they and their descendants disappear from the world in about 2 centuries. If they have 2 children the population never grows larger than 4 times the original Y1 people. Two children to replace two parents. It’s not until you get to three children that you see an increase in population. As well as an increase in tax revenue.
Assume each of the people, or taxpayers, at 20-year intervals earn a median income of $50,000. They pay an effective federal income tax rate of 18%. In addition to 12.4% for Social Security taxes (both employer and employee). And 2.9% for Medicare. Added together they total 33.3%. This tax rate on total income at each 20-year interval produces the tax revenue in the above graph. Note the revenue graphs are the same shape as the population graphs. Showing a direct correlation between tax revenue and the population growth rate. The tax revenue provided by couples having only one child disappears within two centuries. Revenue provided by couples having only two children peaks out at $6,660,000. As couples only have enough children to replace themselves. Maintaining a constant of 4 taxpayers (2 parents and 2 children) after 80 years. Showing that couples having 2, 1 or 0 children cannot support an expanding welfare state. But a couple having 3 children can. As long as it’s not too big of a welfare state.
You just can’t have an Expanding Welfare State with a Falling Population Growth Rate
The more children a couple has the greater the tax revenue. For the more children they have the more people enter the workforce and become taxpayers. If 50 couples have 3 kids each (as do their descendants) they will add $30.4 million in federal tax revenue in one century. If they have 4 kids they will add $99.9 million in revenue. If they have 5 kids they will add $264 million. And if they have 6 kids they will add $599.4 million.
In two centuries these numbers are even more profound. Couples having 4 kids will provide $3.2 billion in federal tax revenue. While couples having 5 kids will provide $25.8 billion. And couples having 6 kids will provide $145.6 billion. If, that is, 100 pregnancies weren’t aborted 2 centuries earlier.
In the long-term revenue would soar if people simply started having babies again. For birth control and abortion have greatly reduced the number of babies we’re having. Causing tax revenue to fall. We can bring revenue back up by having more babies. But after some 30 years this baby dearth has pushed us into the flat part of these graphs. Requiring up to a century or more to make large population gains. And large gains in tax revenue. And without these gains in revenue we simply cannot afford an expanding welfare state.
It is rather ironic that two tenets of liberalism clash here. Liberals believe in both a welfare state. And free birth control and abortion on demand. They believe in one thing that requires women to have a lot of babies. And another that helps women to have as few babies as possible. Which is another reason liberalism will ultimately fail. Paradoxes like this. For you just can’t have an expanding welfare state with a falling population growth rate. If you try you get trillion dollar deficits. And $16.4 trillion in accumulated debt.
Tags: abortion, American Civil War, babies, birth control, children, expanding welfare state, Great Depression, liberalism, population, population growth rate, Revolutionary War, tax revenue, taxpayers, welfare state, workforce, World War I, World War II
President Obama’s Cairo Speech of Islamist Appeasement Emboldened our Enemies
Candidate Barack Obama said during the 2008 presidential campaign that he would talk to our enemies. Without preconditions. He would discontinue the gunboat diplomacy of George W. Bush. Instead he would open a dialogue with the people who wanted to kill us. Find out why they wanted to kill us. And then resolve those issues that caused our enemies to want to kill us. Which was the core of his foreign policy. Being nice to our enemies to get them to like us. And once they did they would stop killing us.
Some say this started with the Obama apology tour. With his message of appeasement in Cairo in June 2009. Where he told our militant Islamist foes, those people who have a tendency to kill Americans, we only want to live together in peace. And that there is a level of conservative Islamism that was acceptable to the United States. When the Arab Spring began in Iran (a sponsor of anti-American/Western terrorism) in June of 2009 (after Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had won reelection despite reported irregularities) President Obama did nothing to support the Iranian protestors. And the enemies of the United States took notice. The Cairo speech of appeasement. Not condemning the Iranian election results and telling Mahmoud Ahmadinejad that he had to go (as he would tell Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak). The message was clear. America’s enemies could do whatever they wanted. Even become a rogue nuclear power (see Iran: US and others ‘surrendered before the great Iranian nation’ in nuclear deal by Alexander Smith posted 1/14/2014 on NBC News).
Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said world powers including the United States “surrendered before the great Iranian nation” in agreeing an interim nuclear deal with his country, state media reported Tuesday.
Iran reached the deal with the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council — the U.S., Canada, Britain, China, and Russia– and non-member Germany…
Speaking to a crowd gathered in the oil-rich province of Khuzestan on Tuesday, Rouhani said: “Do you know what the Geneva agreement means? It means the big powers have surrendered before the great Iranian nation.”
Apparently appeasing our enemies only makes our enemies bolder. And stronger. Which is probably not a good thing. North Korea is a rogue nuclear state. But their need for food and energy make it unlikely that they will launch a nuclear weapon. They have so far used the threat of doing so just to get what they desperately needed. Food and energy. Militant Islamists, though, want to rid the world of anyone who is not a militant Islamist. Even if they have to die in the process. Which they don’t mind. Because for them this world is only the prelude for the far better afterworld. Whereas the regime running North Korea has no desire to die. They enjoy living in the here and now. And know that won’t continue if they launch a nuclear weapon.
Neville Chamberlain opened a Dialogue with a Lying Adolf Hitler who lied to Chamberlain
The Allies blamed Germany for World War I. And the Versailles Treaty made the peace following the war a difficult one for Germany. Blame for the war, war reparations, loss of territories, emasculation (severe limits on Germany’s military strength), etc. It did a number to German esteem. Especially when they didn’t technically lose World War I. The war ended in an armistice. Where the combatants agreed to a cease fire as they were all exhausted by war. Of course, America’s entry into the war would have most likely led to a German surrender. For they were not yet exhausted by years of war. And could extend the conflict indefinitely until Germany did surrender. But that didn’t happen. Which made for a lot of angry Germans when the Allies treated them as if they had surrendered unconditionally. Setting the stage for an Adolf Hitler to come to power. Which is what happened.
The war left the Germans isolated. Russia pulled out of World War I before its completion and devolved into revolution. Bringing the communists to power. Replacing Russia with the Soviet Union. These developments left them, too, isolated in the post-war world. And then these two isolated nations found each other. Signing the Treaty of Rapallo in 1922. Renouncing any territorial or financial claims between them from the war. And becoming trading partners. Among other things. Such as using Soviet soil to rebuild German armed forces in direct violation of the Versailles Treaty. Where they trained for armor warfare. Built an air force. And even developed chemical weapons. This new eastern friendship had another shared interest. Poland.
Germany and Russia lost portions of Poland following World War I. And they wanted them back. But Hitler tested the waters first. To see how the war-weary allies would react. He marched troops into the demilitarized Rhineland in violation of the Versailles Treaty. And the Allies did nothing. Hitler sent an ultimatum to the Austrian chancellor to hand over power to the Austrian NSDAP (i.e., Austrian Nazi Party) or he would invade Austria. The Austrian chancellor did. And Hitler’s Wehrmacht marched triumphantly into Austria the following day. And the Allies did nothing. Then Hitler turned his eyes to Czechoslovakia. And the Sudetenland. Which he wanted to annex into the Third Reich. And he was willing to do this with an armed invasion. Something that got the war-weary Allies’ attention. For the last thing they wanted in Europe was another war. British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain met with Hitler. And opened a dialogue with him. Finding Hitler to be a reasonable man. And the Allies agreed to give Czechoslovakia’s Sudetenland to Hitler. With Czechoslovakia having little say in the matter. But it was for the greater good. “Peace in our time.” And it was the last territorial acquisition he wanted. He promised. So Hitler got the Sudetenland. And within 6 months Hitler took the rest of Czechoslovakia. Without firing a single shot. Because the Allies were so eager to appease Hitler that they never considered that he was lying to them. Which he was.
The Treaty of Rapallo allowed the Nazis to build the War Machine they eventually Unleashed on the Soviet Union
With the southern border of Poland secured thanks to the Allies giving Czechoslovakia to Germany it was time to recover their lost territory in Poland. All they needed was a little help from their new best friend. The Soviet Union. And it came in the form of a non-aggression pact with the Soviet Union. The Treaty of Non-aggression between Germany and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics signed August 23, 1939. Promising that neither would go to war with the other. Or ally with a nation that does. As well as the secret agreement to invade and divide Poland. As well as dividing up Bessarabia, Estonia, Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, etc. Then, on September 1, 1939, Hitler invaded Poland. Launching World War II. Something they couldn’t have done if it weren’t for their new best friend. The Soviet Union.
After Poland came Norway. Then France and the Low Countries. The British held the Nazis off in the Battle of Britain. Then came North Africa. Yugoslavia. And Greece. Then came Operation Barbarossa. Starting on June 22, 1941. Something Hitler thought about since writing about it in Mein Kampf back in 1925. Finding Lebensraum (i.e., living space) for the German people. In particular the Bread Basket of Europe. The Ukraine. Which if you know your history, and your geography, was part of the Soviet Union. Yes, that’s right. Hitler lied to Joseph Stalin to get what he wanted. Launching off points for the conquest of the Soviet Union. A land he viewed as filled with sub-humans he would kill off with famine after taking their food.
The Soviet people paid a dear price for their leader’s treachery. Enduring hell on earth on the Eastern Front. With some 20 million dead by the time it was over. It was these innocent Soviets who won World War II. Who wore down the Germans with their wholesale dying. At times 10 Soviets dying for every one German. None of which would have happened if Stalin had read Mein Kampf. Or if he didn’t make a pact with the Devil that led to World War II. The secret agreements in the Treaty of Rapallo. Letting the Nazis develop the war machine they eventually unleashed on the Soviet Union. Which just goes to show you that you need to understand who your enemies are. And once you do you cannot try to make nice with them. For they will turn on you once you’ve served your useful purpose. Just like Hitler turned on Stalin. As Iran will turn on the United States after they served their useful purpose in getting them their nuclear weapons. And when that time comes the cost of that war will be far greater than it would have been if it was fought before they had nuclear weapons. With scenes from that war looking more like Hiroshima and Nagasaki than the hell on earth of the Eastern Front
Tags: Adolf Hitler, apology tour, Austria, Barack Obama, Cairo speech, Communist, Czechoslovakia, dialogue, Eastern Front, German-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact, Germany, Hitler, Iran, Islamism, Islamist, Joseph Stalin, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Mein Kampf, militant Islamist, Nazi, Neville Chamberlain, North Korea, nuclear, nuclear power, nuclear weapon, Obama, Operation Barbarossa, Poland, President Obama, Russia, Soviet, Soviet Union, Stalin, Sudetenland, Treaty of Rapallo, Versailles Treaty, World War I, World War II
The Generation that won World War II Sacrificed and Saved for the Future
The generation that lived through the Great Depression and World War II were a hardy people. They knew a thing or two about sacrifice. And going without. For their wants often went unfulfilled. And they were a skinny people. As there was not a lot of food to eat. First because of the Great Depression. When people could barely afford to stay alive. And then World War II. Where the government rationed almost everything for the war effort.
So they spent little. Saved what they could. Got used to not having what they wanted. And always worked hard for a better future. Sound familiar? No. Of course not. No one’s like this today. That hardy generation survived the Great Depression and won World War II. Making the world safe for democracy to flourish. Their free market capitalism made a prosperous world of plenty. So their children would never have to live in a world they had lived in. As it turned out, though, that was a mistake.
Their children were not like their parents. These baby boomers were not as hardy as their parents were. While they struggled and went without the baby boomers didn’t. The baby boomers became the Me Generation. Because it was all about them. They rejected the hard work and sacrifice of their parents. And didn’t save for a better tomorrow. No. For them it was all about the here and now.
The Me Generation rebelled against their Parents and became Anti-Parents
The Me Generation didn’t save like their parents. They spent. Changing the economy forever. From one made strong and healthy driven by private savings that banks converted into investment capital. To a Keynesian one. Where Keynesian economists viewed savings as economic leaks from the economy. No. Spending was better. Consumption was better than saving. Besides, what did we have to save for anymore with the Federal Reserve printing money? And the government paying our way for us in retirement?
The Me Generation was only too happy to help transform the government from one of savings and investment to one of consumptionand gratification. And they lived Life in the Fast Lane (by Joe Walsh, Glenn Frey and Don Henley, recorded by the Eagles in 1976 on the studio album Hotel California). “Everything all of the time.” And when that wasn’t enough there was cocaine to fill the remaining emptiness. “There were lines on the mirror, lines on her face.” Sometimes the drug use became so intense it interfered with another past time of the Me Generation. Sex. “He was too tired to make it, she was too tired to fight about it.”
So while their parents won the Second World War they were partying and getting high and having as much casual sex as their excessive drug use allowed. And because of it the Seventies gave us a new drug in the Eighties. Crack. And a war on drugs. As well as AIDS. Thank you, Me Generation. For rebelling against your parents and becoming anti-parents. Destroying our past culture and traditions. And our religion. Just so you can have “everything all of the time.” Right now. Without ever waiting to gratify an urge or desire.
Obamacare will Fail because the Young won’t give up their Life of Consumption and Gratification
The counterculture (i.e., the anti-parents) movement then entered academia. Took over the curriculum in our public schools. And our colleges and universities. Where they taught our kids that everything their parents told them was wrong. That they are destroying the environment. That American imperialism is the greatest threat to world peace. That the Founding Fathers were rich white slave owners who wrote the Constitution to further their greed. That free market capitalism is cruel, callous and unfair. While government is kind, feeling and fair.
The Me Generation learned something valuable as they entered academia. And government. That there are a lot of young people who vote. And because many of them grew up already rebelling against their parents they pushed these people closer to them. The anti-parents. Helping them to hold on to political power. So they appealed to all the things young people want. Such as sex. By providing free birth control and access to abortion. They attack Christianity and tell their students there is nothing wrong with their life of consumption and gratification. And, of course, they favor decriminalizing drugs. And are making great headway in that area with marijuana. I mean, kids just love the Democrats. For they indulge their every want and desire. Without parenting them to sacrifice and save for their future. Like their insufferable parents.
So our young have never been defined more by selfishness, narcissism and hedonism. Always living for the moment. Without a care in the world for the future. Making even the Me Generation seem selfless. Who lived in relative anonymity in their narcissistic world. Unlike today’s youth. Who can’t survive without Instagram, Twitter and Facebook. And must share every iota of their existence with the entire world. Because it’s all about them. The world revolves around them and the pursuit of their life of consumption and gratification. So it is rather ironic that the very thing that keeps Democrats in power—indulging in the youth voters’ selfishness, narcissism and hedonism—could deal such a threatening blow to their power. For Obamacare to work they need these young voters to be more like their parents and less like the people they are. Thanks to the Democrat indoctrination in our public schools, colleges and universities. To sacrifice some of their wants and desires to help their parent’s generation. To consume less. So the people they rebelled against can have free medical care.
This is why Obamacare (the Affordable Care Act) will fail. The young and healthy do not want to give up their life of consumption and gratification. Which means they’re not buying health insurance. Only the old and sick are. Because they need health care. While the young and healthy don’t. So they are not going to buy costly health insurance policies that they feel they will never use. Instead they’ll pay the lower-cost fine. So they can continue to live their life of consumption and gratification. That the Democrats told them all their life was what they should do. Not to save for the future. Or sacrifice. For their parents. Their community. Or their God. So the Affordable Care Act will fail. Because you can’t indulge selfishness, narcissism and hedonism and expect the young to give up their life of consumption and gratification.
Tags: academia, Affordable Care Act, anti-parents, baby boomers, capitalism, consumption, consumption and gratification, drug, everything all of the time, free-market capitalism, gratification, Great Depression, health insurance, hedonism, investment, Keynesian, Me Generation, narcissism, Obamacare, parents, sacrifice, savings, selfishness, World War II
Today Men smoke Marlboro Cigarettes to connect to that Rugged Cowboy on the Billboards
If you had parents or grandparents who lived through the Great Depression and World War II you’ve probably noticed something about them. They were a hardy breed. Especially the men. Sure, we all know someone who changed the oil in their own car. But back then it wasn’t uncommon to change the sparkplugs, shock absorbers, exhaust system, brakes, ball joints, etc. They even bought new tires and put them onto the rims themselves. As well as fixing everything that needed repair around the house. From the furnace to the toilet to the garbage disposal to installing a new roof on the house.
And all of this after they got home from work. Or on the weekend after cutting, edging, fertilizing and watering the grass. So the grass was lush and green for the kids to play on with Dad. When he wasn’t teaching them to ride a bike. How to protect themselves in a fight. Or helping them with their science project. Getting so involved that their kids turned in things they knew their teachers must have known they didn’t build themselves. But that’s how it was back then. There was nothing too complex or too difficult that Dad couldn’t roll up his sleeves and do. Sure, there may have been some cuss words. But that rugged can-do attitude forged in the fires of the Great Depression and World War II provided a feeling of safety and comfort in the home whenever Dad was there. As Dad was both provider and protector.
Today men smoke Marlboro cigarettes to connect to that rugged cowboy on the billboards. Back then they were that cowboy. Tough men who volunteered to fight in World War II. The last time that this type of American man was the rule and not the exception. But after the war the size of government grew. With the least manly men of all, liberals, leading the way. Bringing out the softer and more feminine side of men. Men who cry. And explore their feelings. Eating quiche instead of steak. Diluting the manliness in them. As any form of manliness became a socially undesirable trait.
The Left’s Objectification of Women cause Men to Linger in Adolescence instead of Growing Up and Maturing
It started with the Sexual Revolution. When we went from a family-centered society to one that viewed the idea of family itself as oppression. Women were encouraged to be sexual things instead of a wife and mother. Birth control and abortion made it possible to enjoy the sexual favors of a woman without being in a committed relationship. So men did. Using women to satisfy their lust. And only for that. Allowing women to go on to build a career. While men began to degenerate into a state of permanent adolescence. Being that young man who has but one thought on his mind all of the time.
Exit the cowboy. And enter the government. LBJ gave us the Great Society. And Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC). Giving rise to absentee fathers. And single mothers raising their children alone in government-built public housing. For the provider and protector left the household. As the government stepped in to take over that role. And did a horrible job. Destroying inner-city families. As crime-ridden public housing pushed these fatherless boys into gangs. And drugs. Which migrated to and infected their schools like a cancer. Boys who grew up seeing the new normal. Women are only for sexual pleasure. Not marrying and raising a family with. As their children followed the same path. Growing up without a father. With the state being provider and protector. Poorly, of course.
As men lingered in their adolescence they never fully grew up and matured. The very people who are responsible for this—the liberal left—blamed men for their brutishness. Saying it was the natural state of man. And soon made the very act of responding to the attractiveness of a woman as a form of sexual harassment. The government provides free birth control and access to abortion so women can be as sexually active as possible. The left attacks the censors and pushes the boundaries on television and in the movies. Today broadcast television shows often carry warnings like “Strong Coarse Language” and “Intensely Suggestive Dialogue.” Sexual imagery bombards us. For sex sells. It even sells sex on broadcast television. Such as the Victoria Secret Fashion Show. With beautiful models dressed only in underwear strut across the catwalk for one purpose. To bring attention to their sexual parts that their sexy underwear barely covers. So they can sell their lingerie to spice up sex in the bedroom. They do all of this and yet attack men as being primeval and brutish when they make inappropriate comments to women. Such as “You’re looking lovely today.”
The Archetypical Young Man Today is a bespectacled Man-Boy in a Plaid Pajama Onesie Sipping a Hot Chocolate
It’s a confusing world today. Women are encouraged to look as beautiful as ever while men aren’t supposed to notice. Liberals encourage them to explore their sexuality while they condemn men for wanting to enjoy that sexuality. Pulling them even further away from marriage and family as they turn to the world of online pornography. Further objectifying the already objectified woman. But in cyberspace men know their advances won’t be construed as sexual harassment. Social media even pulls the sexes further apart. Often the only time they get together is for sex. The Japanese young are even turning away from sex. As the cost of living in their nanny state is so great they don’t want to be burdened with the high cost of raising a family. Not surprisingly, life-like sex robots are a reality now in Japan. And elsewhere.
The left has been marginalizing the role of men in today’s society. They get women in as many male roles as possible. Even in the brutal sport of boxing. Which exemplifies man’s brutish nature. But celebrates the advancement of women in a male-dominated society. Even same-sex marriage further and subtly diminishes the role of man as the head of the household and provider and protector of the family. By equating the sexes. A man can have a husband or a wife. And a woman can have a wife or a husband. Advancing the idea of the obsolescence of man in traditional male roles. As President Obama’s Life of Julia showed how the government can be the provider and protector for women from 3 to 67. And the recent ad to get the young invincibles to sign up for Obamacare. Showing what the left considers to be the archetypical young man today. A bespectacled man-boy wearing a plaid pajama onesie while sipping a hot chocolate. A far cry from the rugged manliness of the Marlboro Man.
Is this the ideal man women want? Is this the man that can put a new tire on a rim? Is this the man that can win a world war? Is this man going to make anyone feel safe and protected? For when it comes to raising a family who do you want as father? Bespectacled pajama man-boy? Or the Marlboro Man? Paula Cole put this well in a song during the Nineties (see Where have all the cowboys gone).
Where is my John Wayne
Where is my prairie son
Where is my happy ending
Where have all the cowboys gone…
Where is my Marlboro man
Where is his shiny gun
Where is my lonely ranger
Where have all the cowboys gone
And we have a war on women? Seems more like a war on men if you ask me. And, sadly, it’s one men are losing. Sad for both men and women. And the nation. As real men are now the exception now and not the rule.
Tags: abortion, absentee fathers, birth control, cowboy, family, fatherless boys, Great Depression, liberals, manliness, Marlboro, Marlboro cigarettes, Marlboro Man, mother, Obamacare, obsolescence of man, pajama man-boy, protector, provider, provider and protector, public housing, sexual harassment, single mothers, war on men, war on women, wife, World War II
Week in Review
Boys love their fathers. And it’s tough losing them. Just listen to some Pink Floyd music. During the Roger Waters’ period. Whose concept albums were shaped by his experience growing up without a father who died in World War II. As the children of Britain grew up in a dearth of fathers following World War II. As so many of their fathers died in the war. Waters went on to great success. But he suffered for his art. As all great artists do. Who probably would have preferred to be happy instead of being a great artist.
The bond between child and parent is so strong that the parent doesn’t even have to die to affect the child. Just periods of separation is enough to do damage (see Military deployments tied to teens’ depression by Kathleen Raven posted 11/29/2013 on Reuters).
Adolescents who experience the deployment of a family member in the U.S. military may face an increased risk of depression, suggests a new study.
Ninth- and eleventh-grade students in California public schools with two or more deployment experiences over the past decade were 56 percent more likely to feel sad or hopeless compared with their non-military-family peers, the researchers found.
The same kids were 34 percent more likely to have suicidal thoughts.
So it would follow the more deployments (i.e., the less time the parent spends with their child) the more likely the increased risk of depression, feelings of hopelessness and suicidal thoughts. So the more time one parent stays away the less happy and the more frequent mental health issues a child suffers. With the child no doubt suffering the most should that parent die in a combat zone. Thus being removed from the child’s life forever. Sad. But intuitive. For most probably didn’t need a study to tell them this.
The same can be said about single mothers. And their children. For it is the absence of one parent from their lives that reduces the quality of their lives. Because that father isn’t there to toss the football around with him after school. To attend a tea party with her favorite stuffed animals. To be there to teach them what to do when they lose power during a thunderstorm. And make them feel safe just by being there.
We take a lot of things Dad does—or did—for granted. And the more time we spent with him the more we’re able to do the things he did when he’s no longer there to do them. So the more time we have with Dad the stronger and more able we become. The less time we have the less strong or able we become. And if he’s not there at all it is like a child losing him in a military deployment.
The Democrats attack the Republicans and claim they have a war on women. Because they don’t want to provide free birth control. Abortion. Or an expanding welfare state for single mothers. The left really doesn’t want women to have children. And if they do they want to help mothers raise their children without a father. By having the state replace the father. So women can remain free. Pursue careers. And not be condemned to stay-at-home motherhood. The left does all of these things for women. For it’s what is best for them. Without ever considering what’s best for the child. Two parents. They will do studies to prove this if they can condemn the military for the effect it has on children. But when it’s about women enjoying life to the fullest while treating pregnancy as a disease to avoid it’s a different story. And for those women who become infected with pregnancy? They don’t need a man in their life. As long as there is the reassuring embrace of government to comfort her.
The Republicans don’t have a war on women. But you could say that Democrats have a war on children. As they always put a woman’s happiness over her child’s happiness. For a child would rather grow up in a traditional family than be shuffled back and forth from daycare. Just listen to some Pink Floyd music if you don’t believe that’s true.
Tags: child, children, Democrats, deployment, depression, father, hopeless, military, mother, parent, Pink Floyd, pregnancy, Republicans, Roger Waters, single mothers, suicidal thoughts, war on women, World War II
Democrats close National Parks and Deny Cancer Treatment for Children to win Political Contest
The politicians have shut down the government. And the executive branch (i.e., President Obama’s branch) is really trying to make the shutdown hurt. In fact they are gleeful. For the president had his ass handed to him over his redline comment on Syria. Having been ridiculed on the international stage he is trying to show how tough he is with people he can push around. Americans.
So President Obama has closed national monuments. To really annoy the people. Even World War II veterans (men who know a thing or two about courage and bravery and being tough) coming to see the outdoor World War II monument. Yes, he closed that, too. But he didn’t stop there. His executive branch even tried to close Mount Vernon. The privately owned and privately operated Mount Vernon. Proving the politics that motivate the president and the Democrats.
When a reporter asked Senator Harry Reid if he would approve a spending bill that would let children with cancer to participate in an experimental treatment program he said ‘no’. Because if he did that would mean the other side would have won. When you’re talking about winners and losers, though, you’re not doing what is best for the American people. You’re doing whatever you can to win. Regardless of what’s best for the people.
The Obama administration refused additional security in Benghazi so they wouldn’t offend their Muslim Hosts
The Democrats are playing hardball. Acting like petulant children who can’t get their way. And they don’t care who they hurt in the process. Children throwing tantrums rarely do. Pity they couldn’t show this same toughness when it comes to real enemies of America.
President Obama and the Democrats have unleashed every invective in the dictionary against the Republicans. Calling them terrorists and their actions jihad. Yet they bend over backwards not to offend those waging jihad against America. To this day they still call the Fort Hood massacre workplace violence. After the Boston Marathon bombing they held off calling it an act of terrorism. And refuse to call the bombers Muslim even though they were Muslims fighting a jihad for Islam.
When the American ambassador in Libya requested additional security for their mission in Benghazi the Obama administration refused the request. As they didn’t want to offend the sensitivities of their Muslim hosts in Benghazi by showing that we were worried about our safety there. For President Obama won the War on Terror with the killing of Osama bin Laden. So there was nothing to worry about. And there was an election coming up. So not only were they worried about their Islamic host’s sensitivities they were worried about how a ramp up of security in Benghazi would look back at home. As they were getting a lot of miles out their campaign slogan. “Osama bin Laden is dead. And General Motors is alive.” Which led to four dead Americans in Benghazi.
The Democrats hold Social Security Recipients Hostage whenever they can’t get What they Want
Of course, what government shutdown would be complete without scaring old people? Yes, they have brought up Social Security. Because those Social Security recipients are hostages to the government. If the government doesn’t get what they want the government threatens to take away their benefits.
The government shutdown does not affect Social Security. But tying the current fight in with the future fight over raising the debt limit helps the Democrats. For they buy a lot of votes. Which isn’t cheap. Each year federal spending increases to pay for new and/or expanded federal programs that buy votes from those they make dependent on government. This is the Democrats’ great fear. That they won’t be able to raise the debt limit. So they can continue to buy votes. Which they must do as they can’t win in the arena of ideas.
Which is why they’re already playing the Social Security card. Taking Social Security recipients hostage. Threatening them that if they don’t pressure the Republicans to stop trying to be responsible they will make them pay. And stop issuing their checks. Which further proves how political everything is. First of all, we pay into Social Security. There is a Social Security Trust Fund that is supposedly holding our money. Which means one of two things. Either they’re withholding our own money from us. Or Social Security is really a Ponzi scheme after all. And the Trust Fund is empty. Filled with nothing but federal IOUs. Yes, they’ve spent that money to buy more votes. So not only have they spent more than the government can pay. They’ve also raided our retirement accounts. To buy votes. Which is what Obamacare is all about. Buying votes. To get even more Americans dependent on the government. So the government can hold them, too, hostage to get what they want.
Tags: benefits, Benghazi, buy votes, debt limit, Democrats, dependent on government, government shutdown, hostages, jihad, Libya, Mount Vernon, national monuments, Obamacare, President Obama, Republicans, shutdown, Social Security, Social Security Trust Fund, trust fund, World War II
Governments often turn to Printing Money to Pay for War
It takes money to wage war. A lot of it. War spending is always a country’s greatest expenditure. Because fighting wars is costly. And the longer they last the more costly they become. Pushing countries that are waging war to the brink of financial collapse. Opening the door for another means of waging war. Counterfeiting.
How do you wage war with counterfeiting? By pushing a country’s economy into a financial collapse. If you can’t defeat your enemy with bullets and bombs you destroy their ability to make bullets and bombs. And everything else. Including food. And you do this by devaluing a country’s currency by flooding the money supply with counterfeit bills. Increasing the money supply causes inflation by having more dollars available to buy the same amount of goods. Requiring more and more dollars to buy those same goods. Thus raising prices.
As people struggle with rising prices they buy less. Because they lose purchasing power. Businesses see their sales revenue fall. As people have less disposable income to buy their goods. With falling sales they lay off workers. All of this causes a dramatic fall in tax revenue. Just when they need more to pay the costs of waging war. As well as providing relief for those no longer able to afford food and housing because they lost their jobs. Which is why governments print money during wars. As it is the only choice they have to pay for the high costs of a nation at war.
By the End of the American Civil War about Half of all Money in Circulation was Counterfeit
One of the problems the British had during the American Revolutionary War was that it turned into a world war. The British were also fighting the French and the Spanish. Their entering the conflict stretched the British resources thin. So they turned to counterfeiting. The Americans were already suffering a terrible inflation as the Continental Congress had little choice but to turn to printing money to pay for the war. They printed so many continental dollars that people began to refuse to accept it in payment. Making the continental dollar more and more worthless. Hence the expression ‘not worth a continental’. The British tried to push the American economy into collapse by adding to that currency devaluation. It was so destructive to the American cause that General Washington hanged counterfeiters.
During the early years of the American Civil War the North was running through her gold reserves. So Congress passed the Legal Tender Act (2/24/1862). Authorizing the printing of paper money to pay for war. Just like they did during the Revolutionary War. A new national currency was a counterfeiter’s dream. Instead of different banks issuing different banknotes across the country there was now only one. Counterfeits were easy to pass as few could tell a real one from a fake one. And with the Confederate dollar worthless even the Confederates wanted these new dollars. To buy things the Confederate dollar no longer could. The new counterfeits were even easier to pass in the South as there was no official currency trading hands there. Counterfeiting was so bad (by the end of the Civil War about half of all the money in circulation was counterfeit) that the Lincoln administration created the Secret Service to combat it.
The Nazis tried to bomb Britain into submission during World War II. Or at least to weaken it enough for a cross-channel invasion. The only problem with their plan was that the British had the Supermarine Spitfire. One of the greatest fighter planes of the war. And some of the finest pilots ever to fly. Who had an able assist from the new radar. Allowing these few to defeat the Luftwaffe in the Battle of Britain. And made the cross-channel invasion impossible. It’s these few Winston Churchill’s “Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few” refer to.
Counterfeiting is a very Effective Way to Wage War while being Cheaper and Less Risky than Conventional War
The Nazis took a beating in the Battle of Britain. So Hitler turned his war machine eastward. And invaded the Soviet Union instead. But he did not give up on Britain. For Britain was a great thorn in Hitler’s side. They were in the Mediterranean and North Africa. And they were producing oil in Iran. They had the shipping lanes. As well as the United States as an ally. Who was feeding food and war material to Britain. And using that island nation to base their bombers out of. As well as building up an invasion force there that would one day open up a second front in the West. Enter Operation Bernhard.
Operation Bernhard was a Nazi plan to flood the British economy with counterfeit money. To destabilize the British economy. And push it into collapse. They set up operations in concentration camps. And were printing about 1 million counterfeit banknotes a month. The Nazis then laundered the money. And used it to buy the war material they needed. The counterfeits were so good that they were still turning up in Britain a decade after the war. Forcing the British to withdraw all notes (larger than £5) from circulation and replacing them with a more counterfeit-proof money.
The Nazis turned to the American dollar in 1945. They set up printing presses in February. But they cancelled their plans. The war ended later that year. Allowing the Americans to escape the economic damage the British suffered at the hands of the Nazi counterfeiting program. But the idea lives on. We see ‘superdollars’ (counterfeits so good that their quality is higher than the original) all over the world. The U.S. suspects the source of these counterfeits are criminal gangs in Iran, Russia, China or Syria. While suspecting the government of North Korea producing a share of these superdollars. We don’t know for certain who is creating this counterfeit money but there is a lot of it out there. Some may be doing it for financial gain. While others may be doing it to damage the United States economically. Whatever the reason the result is the same. Resulting in the scourge of paper money. Higher inflation. Currency devaluation. Higher prices. And less economic activity. Possibly even sending the economy into a deep recession. Everything an enemy of the United States wants to do to the United States. Making counterfeiting a very effective way to wage war while being cheaper and less risky than conventional war.
Tags: American Civil War, Battle of Britain, Confederate dollar, continental dollars, counterfeit bills, counterfeiting, currency devaluation, Hitler, inflation, money supply, Nazi, Operation Bernhard, paper money, prices, printing money, Revolutionary War, superdollars, waging war, World War II
Once the Soviet People experienced Communism they discovered they did not like Communism
The Soviet people won World War II. For no matter how many Soviets the Nazis killed on the Eastern Front they just kept coming. The Nazis killed 10 Soviets for each Nazi the Soviets killed. But it wasn’t enough. They slowed down the Nazi war machine. Then the rains came. Then the Russian winter. Slowing them down at the gates of Moscow. And stopping them in Stalingrad. Halting the Nazi advance. And turning the tide in the war.
The Nazis were brutal to the Soviet people. Following the Wehrmacht into the Soviet Union was the Einsatzgruppen. Mobile killing squads. To do what the death camps did later. Hitler wanted the Russian land for food. And its resources. But he didn’t want the Soviet people. Except those he could use for forced-labor. That’s how cruel the Nazis were to the Soviets. Which wasn’t necessary to topple the Soviet regime. For the Soviet people would have embraced the invading Nazis as liberators.
Once the Soviet people had experienced communism following the Russian Revolution they discovered that they did not like communism. There were shortages of everything. And brutal state oppression. Which a communist state needs. For if they don’t oppress their people they may challenge the regime. Or try to escape. So it was Hitler’s brutality that allowed the Allies to defeat Nazi Germany. For it was only his brutality that made the Soviets rally around the Soviet state that they hated just as much at the time of the Nazi invasion.
The Russian Naval Facility in Tartus is the only Remaining Naval Facility outside of the Former Soviet Union
The Soviet leader, Joseph Stalin, was a cruel man. When it comes to killing your own people he tops the list in the sheer numbers killed. He’s right there with another communist dictator. Mao Zedong of the People’s Republic of China. But when it comes to killing the largest percentage of your own people the communist Pol Pot of Cambodia tops that list. So communist states are cruel and serious offenders of human rights. With Joseph Stalin being the cruelest and the greatest offender of them all. The man was as evil as Adolf Hitler. But you know who admired Stalin? Vladimir Putin. The Russian president.
Vladimir Putin is former KGB. That’s the secret police that put the fear of God into the Soviet people. They did what the Gestapo did to Germans in Nazi Germany. All powerful and above the law they could do anything to the ordinary Soviet. And did. Those in power liked it that way. Vladimir Putin admired the Soviet Union. And thought its collapse was the greatest tragedy of the 20th century.
Following World War II the Soviet Union started adding countries to the Soviet sphere. Eastern Europe. North Korea. North Vietnam. Cuba. And countries in the Middle East. Including Egypt. And Syria. Where Russia still has a naval base. The Russian naval facility in Tartus. Established in 1971. And is the only remaining Russian naval facility outside of the former Soviet Union.
Since the Fall of the Soviet Union Vladimir Putin has wanted to make Russia a Superpower Again
Israel is an American ally. During the Cold War the Soviet Union used this to agitate the Arab states into the Soviet sphere. The Soviets fomented radical Islam in the Arab states. To extend their hatred of Jewish Israel to the Judeo-Christian United States. Ally and sponsor of Israel. Christian Crusaders. And the Soviets were successful. They had Egypt. And Syria. Who fought Israel in the Six Day War (1967). And again in the Yom Kippur War (1973). A hot war in the Cold War between the Soviet Union and the United States.
Then a dark period followed for the Soviet Union. Egypt swapped their alliance from the Soviet Union to the United States. And the 1979 Egypt-Israel Peace Treaty. When Egyptian President Anwar El Sadat made peace with Israel. Breaking up the great anti-Israel alliance that it worked so hard to promote. A devastating 1-2 body blow for the Soviets. Allowing their Cold War adversary greater hegemony in the Middle East. Tipping the balance of power in the Cold War. Which the Americans went on to win.
This is history Vladimir Putin did not much care for. Ever since the fall of the Soviet Union this former KGB officer wanted one thing. To make Russia a superpower again. He’s helping the Iranians with their nuclear program. And he’s supporting Assad in Syria. Bringing these Middle East nations into the Russian sphere. Outside of the American sphere. This history puts the politics of the Russian offer to take Syria’s chemical weapons into a different light. For that offer comes with the caveat that there shall be no U.S. military action against Assad. In other words, we will punish the Assad regime for using chemical weapons by helping it. And will help the opposition in their fight against the Assad regime by strengthening its enemy. To return to the status quo. A Syria strongly allied to Russia and Iran. Growing Russian hegemony in the Middle East. And an America in decline on the world stage.
Tags: Assad, chemical weapons, Cold War, Communism, Eastern Front, Egypt, Hitler, human rights, Iran, Israel, Joseph Stalin, KGB, Middle East, Nazi, Putin, radical Islam, Russia, Russian Naval Facility in Tartus, Soviet, Soviet people, Soviet sphere, Soviet Union, Stalin, Syria, Tartus, Vladimir Putin, World War II
Wherever the Soviets pushed the Americans pushed back to Contain the Expansion of Communism
Once upon a time Democrats were practically warmongers. Woodrow Wilson got us into World War I. FDR got us into World War II. Harry Truman got us into the Korean War. And LBJ got us into the Vietnam War. While Republicans were nearly pacifists. Dwight Eisenhower got us out of the Korean War. And Richard Nixon got us out of the Vietnam War.
Eisenhower was the Supreme Allied Commander in Europe during World War II. Saw the carnage of war up close. And was glad when it was over. Unlike General Patton. Who wanted to invade the Soviet Union. Because he knew we would have to fight them sooner or later. And rather do it then when they had the most awesome military force in the world still in Europe. General Patton lost command of Third Army because of talk like that. And later would die from injuries he got in a freak car accident.
It didn’t take long following the end of World War II for the Soviets to become the new big bad in town. Just like General Patton foresaw. Truman stood up to them in Berlin. Greece. Turkey. Iran. And Korea. Wherever they pushed the Americans tried to hold the line. To contain the expansion of communism. It was the Cold War. And it first got hot in Korea. But the UN forces held the line in Korea. After three years of war. About as long as America spent fighting in Europe during World War II.
JFK’s refusal to commit American Military Power during the Bay of Pigs Invasion led to the Cuban Missile Crisis
Communism was a thorn in the side of democracy. The democratic West believed in peace through strength. With the occasional war breaking the peace. While the communist East believed in a perpetual state of war with the occasional peace breaking that war. The communists sought to expand through violent revolution. If you contained it early (like in the Berlin Airlift) you could avoid a shooting war. And keep it cold. But if they got a foothold you could find yourself mired in a hot and prolonged war. Like in Korea.
When Fidel Castro turned Cuba communist it was not a good thing for the United States. For all their efforts to contain communism throughout the world here they were. On Cuba. Within missile range of the United States. And Castro was cozying up to the Soviets. Which is why President Eisenhower gave the green light for the CIA to remove Castro from power. To remove a threat so close to the United States. The plan was the Bay of Pigs Invasion. Which proceeded under the following administration. JFK’s.
The invasion, though, did not go well. And unlike in the Guatemalan coup d’état, JFK did not commit American military power to help the invaders (unlike Eisenhower did in the Guatemalan coup). Who were soon pushed back. And defeated. Which breathed new life in Cuba’s communist revolution. Brought them more into the Soviet sphere. And encouraged the Soviets to test this young president. Which they did. By sending nuclear missiles to Cuba. Leading to the Cuban Missile Crisis. And near nuclear war (Castro’s right hand man, Che Guevara, was angry with the Soviets because they refused to nuke the United States during the crisis). While the Cuban people suffered under their communist oppressors. And still do.
Today Iran—and Radical Islam—is the Thorn in the Side of Democracy that Communism once Was
Truman was the last Democrat warrior president. LBJ got us into Vietnam. But he also gave us the Great Society. Turning the nation towards a welfare state. A very costly welfare state. Which the great costs of the Vietnam War threatened. The government, much like they did during the Revolutionary War, began printing money to pay for all of this spending. Devaluing a dollar pegged to gold. With nations concerned with this devaluation they traded their dollars for gold. Which is what is supposed to happen under a gold standard. So nations don’t devalue their currencies. But printing money is easier than cutting spending. So President Nixon decoupled the dollar from gold. So they could really print it. Giving us the inflationary Seventies.
Since then Democrat presidents have done two things. Expanded the welfare state. And demonized their political opponents. Which extended to their foreign policy. President Carter cut back on defense spending. And tried to make friends with our archenemy. The Soviet Union. A president the Soviets had little respect for. Even considering a nuclear first-strike policy as they didn’t think Carter would ever launch his nuclear weapons. And then President Carter criticized American ally, Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi, the Shah of Iran, for his human rights violation. There was revolutionary fervor in the air. The Shah implored for help from their long-time friend and ally. The United States. Who assured the Shah that the Americans would intervene militarily on his behalf. But didn’t. The Iranian Revolution followed. And Iran became America’s new archenemy.
Iranian oil won World War II. It fed the Red Army. Iran served as a portal into the Soviet Union. War material as well as oil flowed through Iran and into the Soviet Union. After the war the Soviets didn’t want to leave Iran. Give up that oil. Or a warm-weather port on the Indian Ocean. But the British and the Americans helped the Iranians keep the Soviets at bay. Their actions included a coup. And some human rights violations. To keep what happened in Eastern Europe following World War II from happening in Iran. Iran prospered. And Westernized. It was becoming everything the American left loved. Secular. It was becoming more like America. Where men and women enjoyed doing things they could enjoy in New York City. Which angered the Islamists.
Today Iran—and radical Islam—is the thorn in the side of democracy that communism once was. And unlike their Cold War warrior forefathers, today’s Democrats choose party over country. Basing their foreign policy on expanding the welfare state. Or demonizing their political opponents. President Clinton treated al Qaeda’s increasing acts of hostility against Western/American interests as a legal issue. Which grew bolder until they culminated in the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Clinton did this so he wouldn’t waste money on defense by risking war to protect America. Or anger his liberal base. After 9/11, George W. Bush fought back.
The Democrats have demonized George W. Bush as a rich oil man who traded blood for oil. While at the same time they said he was purposely causing oil shortages to raise the price of oil. When an opportunity came to overthrow America’s new archenemy, Iran, President Obama did nothing to support the Green Revolution in Iran following questionable election results that kept Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in power. An intervention that would have been in the best interests of both America and the Iranian people. But when the Arab Spring blew through Egypt he was quick to tell our friend and ally, Hosni Mubarak, that he had to go. Turning Egypt over to the Islamist Muslim Brotherhood. But when civil war came to Syria he chose to do nothing. Until now (to save face from his ‘red line’ comment about chemical weapons?). When the opposition has most probably been infiltrated by al Qaeda.
What is the constant in these Democrat foreign policy decisions? They are the opposite of what the Republicans would have done. So they couldn’t have done them. For it would have vindicated George W. Bush. Angered their liberal base. And made the world a safer place.
Tags: Al Qaeda, Bay of Pigs, Bay of Pigs Invasion, Berlin, Carter, Castro, Clinton, Cold War, Communism, Communist, Cuba, Cuban Missile Crisis, democracy, Democrats, Egypt, Eisenhower, foreign policy, George W. Bush, Guatemalan coup, human rights violations, Iran, Islamist, JFK, Korea, Korean War, LBJ, Nixon, Obama, Patton, printing money, radical Islam, Republicans, revolution, Soviet Union, Soviets, Truman, Vietnam War, welfare state, World War II
« Previous Entries