Anchor/Passport Babies proof that People wished Britain/America had conquered the World

Posted by PITHOCRATES - February 8th, 2014

Week in Review

The problem with a generous welfare state and porous borders is that they attract a lot of foreign-born people to your country to cash in on those generous welfare benefits.  Some even make the journey while pregnant so their child is born in the country with the generous welfare benefits.  And not the cruel, cold-hearted benefit-free country they are escaping.  Giving them an ‘anchor’ in the country they’d much rather live in than the country they don’t want to live in.  Their native country.

The United States has a porous border with Mexico.  And many Mexicans give birth in the United States while in the country illegally just so their child doesn’t have to grow up in Mexico.  Which when you think about is a statement on how these Mexicans feel about the ‘imperial’ United States.  They must really hate them for not taking the rest of Mexico when they won the Mexican War.  Had the Americans done so there would be no need for anchor babies.  For they would already be enjoying American citizenship south of the Rio Grande.  Based on the number of Mexicans entering America illegally, at least.

The United States isn’t the only country people want to live in.  Canada, too, is a beautiful country with a generous welfare state.  The winters are a little colder, though.  But that doesn’t stop people from trying to become Canadian citizens with anchor babies.  Only they call them ‘passport babies’ in Canada (see Canadian citizenship bill to be tabled Thursday by Susana Mas posted 2/2/2014 on CBC News).

Alexander said the proposed changes to the Citizenship Act would also aim to reduce the current backlog of applications and change the conditions for eligibility.

The government is also considering changes to tackle the problem of so-called “birth tourism” or “passport babies,” but Alexander told CBC News they would not be included in this bill.

Americans and Canadians aren’t better people.  They just live in countries that allow their people to be better.  Which is the problem in Mexico.  Not the people.  As the Americas were colonized Britain was further along in representative government than Spain.  Free market capitalism replaced mercantilism quicker in British America than it did in Spanish America.  And democratic institutions were more developed in British America than they were in Spanish America.  Such that the foundation for representative government, free market capitalism and democracy was more robust in British American than it was in Spanish America.

Because of this when the Americans gained their independence great peace and prosperity followed.  A first following a civil war.  Allowing America and Canada (later granted their independence from the British Empire) to be lands of opportunity.  With strong human rights.  Ironically, in large part to the School of Salamanca.  One of the greatest gifts Spain gave to the world.  Which is why people want to have their babies born in these countries.  So they can be as great as they want to be.  Because only representative government, free market capitalism and democracy can make this possible.  At least based on history.

But you can’t have people entering your country unchecked.  Especially if they’re coming for the benefits.  And your country has annual deficits and a growing national debt.  For adding more people to the benefits roll when you can’t afford it will transform the country from that land of opportunity people want to come to into the country they are fleeing.  Countries with high spending and devalued currencies that lead to black markets and lawlessness.  The very things people want to get away from by having their babies in the United States and Canada.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Study finds that the Liberal Policies Like that Favored by President Obama make People Unhappy

Posted by PITHOCRATES - April 8th, 2012

Week in Review

Money can’t buy happiness.  A new study proves it.  For it’s not buying the richest country in the world happiness.  So there is something else apparently that leads to a people’s happiness (see Canada among the happiest countries in the world by Tavia Grant posted 4/2/2012 on The Globe and Mail).

It finds the world has, broadly speaking, become a “little happier” in the past three decades, as living standards have risen. (One exception is the United States, where life satisfaction has not improved).

Interesting.  Life satisfaction in America hasn’t improved.  I wonder why.  And what are the things that make people more satisfied in life.  Here are some of those things according to this study.

•Happier countries tend to be richer ones. But more important for happiness than income are social factors like the strength of social support, the absence of corruption and the degree of personal freedom.

•Unemployment causes as much unhappiness as bereavement or separation. At work, job security and good relationships do more for job satisfaction than high pay and convenient hours.

•Behaving well makes people happier.

•Mental health is the biggest single factor affecting happiness in any country. Yet only a quarter of mentally ill people get treatment for their condition in advanced countries and fewer still in poorer countries.

•Stable family life and enduring marriages are important for the happiness of parents and children.

•In advanced countries, women are happier than men, while the position in poorer countries is mixed.

•Happiness is lowest in middle age.

Liberal Democrats are all for bigger government.  Continuously raising taxes to pay for it.  The federal budget has exploded as a result.  As has the debt.  For despite the vast wealth they’re taxing out of the private sector it isn’t enough.  And as it is anywhere where people manage large piles of money there is corruption.  The bigger the pile the bigger the corruption.  And so it is with government.  Just look at the billions thrown away on pork barrel spending on worthless projects like the Murtha Airport.  This kind of out of control corrupt pork barrel spending makes people unhappy.  Apparently they would be happier with a government that lives responsibly within their means like they have to.  At least, according to this study.

High taxes and onerous regulatory compliance costs are squeezing small business.  Millionaire entrepreneurs of yesteryear say they couldn’t do what they did today.  The explosion in new regulatory law just squashes innovation.  It’s simply too costly and too complicated to go into business.  There are so many laws that it impossible to know them all.  Unless you’re a lawyer.  And lawyers are about the only ones who understand these laws.  Or, at least, understand them enough.  So they can sue any business for violating some obscure law the business owner is unaware of.  And they do this all the time.  It’s legal extortion.  For business owners find it cheaper to settle out of court just to make the lawyers go away.  As a result this active interventionist government pushed by liberal Democrats is a drag on job creation.  Whose answer is more benefits for the unemployed rather than helping the job creators.  This tenuous job environment makes workers feel less secure in their own jobs.  And less happy.  According to this study.

Liberals attack religion and their moralizing.  They attack conservatives and their moralizing.  Liberals instead prefer fewer restraints placed on life.  For who is to say what is right and wrong?  So they favor relaxed drug laws.  Free contraceptives.  Abortion on demand.  And as much consequence-free fun as they can have.  In public places.  And in quiet neighborhoods.  Where property damage is just kids blowing off a little steam.  I mean, who hasn’t done a donut on a neighbor’s lawn because they told them to be quiet at 2 in the morning?  Well it turns out people prefer having quiet church-going people for neighbors.  Who treat people with respect and behave well when in public.  These are the people that make other people happy.  According to this study, at least.

LBJ was a big liberal Democrat.  His Great Society was a bonanza of welfare benefits for the poor.  Especially for single mothers.  The government said to these single moms, “Look, you don’t need a husband in your life.  We will provide for you and your children.  We’ll even provide public housing for you to live in.  So you don’t need a husband.  And your children don’t need a father.  We can be all of that for you.”  Well, the worse place to live was in public housing during the Seventies.  Where crime and drugs use was rampant.  With no stable family structure kids of single parents turned to the street.  And crime.  Taking that behavior into their schools.  Spreading the trouble.  Having the government take over the role of family was like introducing a cancer into a healthy being.  And it spreads still to this day.  The idea that family isn’t important.  And that government can provide.  But more government has only made people less happy.  At least, according to this study.

The policies of liberal Democrats encourage irresponsible behavior.  Consequence-free fun.  They’ve attacked religion and tried to remove it from everyday life.  To the point that people today have very little if any moral compass.  Young women have babies out of wedlock.  Some of these mothers sacrifice everything in a herculean struggle to raise their children.  Working and sacrificing everything for their children.  Even a happy family life with a husband and father that would have made children rearing easier.  Some single mothers are superheroes.  Some are not.  And neither as are happy as a family with two parents providing for and nurturing their children.  And having time to spend with them in their childhood because they’re not working a second or third job.

So this is why America has not improved in the area of life satisfaction.  Because of the extraordinary growth of liberal Democrat policies.  The very things that lead people to be less happy.  At least, according to this new study.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Three Members of the EBT Card Commission going Rogue, Try to Ban EBT Card use for Strip Clubs, Booze, Cigarettes and Scratch Tickets

Posted by PITHOCRATES - April 7th, 2012

Week in Review

When it comes to battles between conservatives and liberals the battle lines they draw often concern welfare benefits.  The conservatives want to take away milk for children while liberals want to make sure welfare recipients still have their dignity.  And can enjoy strip clubs, booze, cigarettes and scratch tickets (see Pundit: EBT card overhaul puts Hill bigs ‘in the hot seat’ by Chris Cassidy posted 4/5/2012 on the Boston Herald).

Outraged lawmakers trying to prevent taxpayer-funded EBT card abuse are putting the political screws on House and Senate leaders, who will face election-year pressure to place real reforms on the floor for an up-or-down vote, a GOP pundit told the Herald…

Three members of the state’s EBT Card Commission, formed to clean up the program, yesterday announced details of a bill to crack down on abuses, after last week slamming the commission’s failure to come down hard enough.  The rogue group’s bill would ban the use of EBT cards at such places as strip clubs, rent-a-centers, gyms and gun shops; banning card use outside New England states; and restrict how much cash can be drawn. The reform efforts followed Herald reports of welfare recipients spending benefits on booze, cigarettes and scratch tickets.

This is politics.  And, sadly, politics as usual.  Buying votes versus responsible governing.  For both conservatives and liberals know of these welfare abuses.  The difference is that conservatives want to reform the system to stop the abuses.  And liberals want to allow the abuses for the votes these abuses buy.  For they need those votes as few people will vote to raise their taxes to pay for poorly run welfare programs.  But if you’re the recipient of those welfare programs, well then, that’s a different story.  Your votes are for sale.  Which is why liberals fight to make sure welfare recipients can enjoy strip clubs, booze, cigarettes and scratch tickets.  As long as these people remember who it was that allowed them to enjoy these things in the election booth.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

FT102: “Unlike welfare benefits health care costs are transferred to the young, not the rich.” -Old Pithy

Posted by PITHOCRATES - January 27th, 2012

Fundamental Truth

An Undereducated and Inexperienced Electorate benefits Democrats

Tax and spend liberals tax the rich to help the poor.  Something the rich don’t completely object to.  For many rich people are in favor of a safety net for those falling on hard economic times.  The rich just object to the growing welfare state.  Where the governments take ever larger sums of money out of the private economy to spend for political purposes.  To buy votes.

A lot of these feel-good welfare programs appeal to the young.  Who don’t understand policy.  Economics.  Or the effect of high taxes on the economy.  They don’t know.  Because no one taught them.  Their public school education has, instead, taught them about the perils of global warming.  And the evils of capitalism.  Which makes them staunch Democrat voters.  Until they start earning a living.  And begin raising a family.  When a lot of them become Republicans.  Which is why Democrats characterize the Republican Party as nothing but a bunch of old rich people who hate poor people.  Which they’re not.  They’ve just grown up.  And now understand things economic.

That’s why the Democrats need this youth vote.  And even floated the idea of lowering the voting age to 16.  Interesting considering the legal drinking age is 21 in most states.  Which begs the question if they are too irresponsible to drink until they reach the age of 21 why would anyone think they’re responsible enough to vote at 18 let alone 16?  But clearly an undereducated and inexperienced electorate benefits Democrats.  Who will vote for them without any idea of the consequence of their policies.

Obamacare will Require the 97% of Young People who don’t Consume Health Care Benefits to Pay for those who Do

The young support Obamacare.  And national health care.  Because they don’t understand health care.  Or the fact that more than 40% of all patients in the health care system are age 65 or older.  While they, those age 18-29, make up just 3% of all patients.

This is different from all other welfare programs.  Where we tax the rich to help the poor.  Many of the rich also happen to be age 65 or more.  So we’re basically taxing rich old people to help the poor.  Now note the difference with health care.  We’re not ‘taxing’ rich old people to help sick people.  We’re ‘taxing’ young healthy people to pay for sick old people.  And the vast majority of the young are not rich.  They are just at the beginning of their careers.  But they are healthy.  Which brings us to a very critical point in the health care debate.  Healthy people don’t see the doctor.  Because they don’t need to.  Which makes many of these young people choose not to buy health insurance.  Because they don’t need to.  Not when only 3% of them are consuming health care services.  Which is why health insurance is so expensive.  The only people who want to buy it are the biggest consumers of health care services.  That would be like people buying auto insurance only after their car was stolen.  Which doesn’t spread the risk over many policies for a small fee.  It doesn’t spread the risk at all.  And the cost of one insurance policy must approach the cost to replace a stolen car.  Which is not insurance in any sense of the word.

Obamacare includes an individual mandate to purchase health insurance.  Which means the 97% of young people who don’t consume any health care benefits will pay for those who do.  Including the more than 40% age 65 and older.  Which makes it the only government program to transfer costs to those who can least afford them.  Those just starting their careers.  Those age 18-29.

The Youth will Understand Obamacare Forcing them to Buy an Expensive Insurance Policy

The Democrats usually can count on the youth vote.  Because they are undereducated and inexperienced.  And vote for their policies without understanding the consequences of these policies.  But they will understand Obamacare forcing them to buy an expensive insurance policy.  Especially if they have to give up using their smartphone to pay for it.  Which will educate and experience them fast.  Making them responsible grownups.  And Republicans sooner rather than later.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,