Week in Review
For socialism to work you need businesses to provide jobs. Because without people working the government can’t have confiscatory tax rates to fund a massive socialist state. You’ve got to have jobs. Which confiscatory tax rates tend to discourage. For business and rich investors don’t want to pay confiscatory tax rates. François Hollande ran on a socialist platform in France. Promising to raise taxes to bring down the deficit. Which he did. Raise taxes. But it didn’t lower an unemployment rate stubbornly staying above 10%.
High taxes and a poor economy caused the socialists to lose elections. So Hollande is putting together a tax-cutting package. To reverse their electoral losses. You’d think the socialists would have learned their lessons that the people want jobs. And to have jobs you need a business-friendly environment. Which something like this is not going to help (see France bans work e-mail after 6 p.m. by John Johnson, Newser, posted 4/11/2014 on USA Today).
France already has a 35-hour work week, and a new rule is designed to make sure that it doesn’t start shading toward 40 hours because of work-related e-mail.
The Guardian reports that the rule forbids workers from checking their phones or computers for work stuff after 6 p.m., and it forbids employers from pressuring them to do so.
The move apparently doesn’t affect all workers in France, but it does cover about 1 million workers in the tech industry — including French employees of Google and Facebook…
At Fox Business, a U.S. labor expert finds it hard to believe the IT industry can manage such a draconian shut-off time.
“There’s always something going wrong off the clock — when a computer goes down, it doesn’t go down between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m.”
It’s yet another thing to discourage business. Things happen after hours. Can you imagine a business wanting to open themselves to that kind of liability? Having someone in the company send out an email without checking the clock first? Or someone working late into the evening to catch up on a project. Sending out a bunch of emails so people could read them first thing in the morning. If someone else is working late do they read this email? Perhaps this person was waiting for this email and would like to address it that evening to reduce his or her workload the following day. Would this worker have been pressured into reading the email knowing his or her boss would have appreciated the extra effort?
There’s a reason why General Motors (GM) went bankrupt. Well, there are a few of them. But one of them was costly workplace rules. Such as only allowing an electrician to change a light bulb at a work station. Even if the person at that workstation could have changed that bulb in a couple of minutes. Instead of waiting an hour or so for skilled trades to come around to unscrew the burnt out lamp and screw in a new lamp.
These little workplace rules add up. And though seemingly harmless when you look at them one at a time in the aggregate they increase the cost of business. A lot. Just ask GM. Something businesses look at when they are considering the location of a new factory. Whether to expand production at an existing factory. Or whether to shut down a factory and move production out of the country to a more business-friendly environment. Thus killing job creation. Jobs the socialists need for people to have so they can pay confiscatory taxes on their earnings.
A business unfriendly environment will never lower the unemployment rate. As the socialists in France have proven. And left-leaning governments everywhere have proven. Confiscatory tax rates do not attract businesses. Or rich investors. They discourage them. And encourage them to take their money and invest it elsewhere. And create jobs elsewhere. In another country that is a little kinder to business. And job creation.
Tags: business friendly environment, confiscatory tax rates, email, France, Hollande, job creation, jobs, socialism, socialists, tax rates, unemployment, workplace rules
The Unemployment Rate is 13.6% when you count all Unemployed Workers
The economy is getting better and better. There are more new jobs. And the unemployment rate continues to fall. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). But this is little succor for the 10,948,000 who have lost their job since President Obama began trying to make the economy better. No matter what the BLS says (see the Employment Situation Summary posted 2/7/2014 on the Bureau of Labor Statistics).
Total nonfarm payroll employment rose by 113,000 in January, and the unemployment rate was little changed at 6.6 percent, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Employment grew in construction, manufacturing, wholesale trade, and mining…
Among the major worker groups, the unemployment rates for adult men (6.2 percent), adult women (5.9 percent), teenagers (20.7 percent), whites (5.7 percent), blacks (12.1 percent),and Hispanics (8.4 percent) showed little change in January. The jobless rate for Asians was 4.8 percent (not seasonally adjusted), down by 1.7 percentage points over the year. (See tables A-1, A-2, and A-3.).
The number of long-term unemployed (those jobless for 27 weeks or more), at 3.6 million, declined by 232,000 in January. These individuals accounted for 35.8 percent of the unemployed. The number of long-term unemployed has declined by 1.1 million over the year. (See table A-12.)
Once again there are more new jobs and the unemployment rate fell. Further proof the Obama administration says that their policies are working. But the low unemployment rate is misleading. As there are 91,455,000 people who are no longer in the labor force (see Table A-1. Employment status of the civilian population by sex and age). An increase of 10,948,000 since President Obama entered office. The BLS doesn’t count these unemployed people as unemployed in their calculation of the official unemployment rate. If you did that would raise the unemployment rate to 13.6%. Which is a lot higher than the official 6.6%. And better reflects public sentiment on the economy.
Ironically, the people hurt most by the Obama economic policies—teenagers, blacks and Hispanics—are also the biggest supporters of the president. Which tells us they obviously support him for reasons other than the economy. And apparently put those reasons above having a job. At least based their respective unemployment rates.
If we count all Unemployed and Underemployed the Current Economic Recovery would take more than 20 Years
Of the people they actually count as unemployed about a third of them have been unemployed for 27 weeks or more. So a large percentage of the unemployed are not suffering from frictional unemployment. That brief period of unemployment between jobs. No. These people have lost their jobs. And can’t find new ones. While others can find only part-time jobs.
The number of persons employed part time for economic reasons (sometimes referred to as involuntary part-time workers) fell by 514,000 to 7.3 million in January. These individuals were working part time because their hours had been cut back or because they were unable to find full-time work. (See table A-8.)
In January, 2.6 million persons were marginally attached to the labor force, little changed from a year earlier. (The data are not seasonally adjusted.) These individuals were not in the labor force, wanted and were available for work, and had looked for a job sometime in the prior 12 months. They were not counted as unemployed because they had not searched for work in the 4 weeks preceding the survey. (See table A-16.)
If you add the people up who want a full-time job but can’t get one that’s 9,900,000 who can’t find a full-time job. If we only add 113,000 jobs a month it will take over 87 months to get these people the full-time jobs they want. Or more than 7 years. If we count the last 5 years of the Obama presidency it will take the economic recovery out to 12 years. If we add the people who have left the labor force to the underemployed (the part-time workers looking for a full-time job) that would extend the economic recovery to 244 months. Or more than 20 years. Which is longer than the length of the economic recovery following the Great Depression.
The Obama administration still blames George W. Bush for causing the Great Recession. But one thing they do say over and over is that it was the worst economic disaster since the Great Depression. So they are saying that the Great Depression was worse than the Great Recession. Yet the current economic recovery is on track to last longer than the economic recovery following the Great Depression.
President Obama’s Economic Recovery is on Course to be the Worst Economic Recovery in U.S. History
The Great Depression and the Great Recession share something in common. In both the government used Keynesian economics to try and pull the nation out of the economic crisis. With huge government stimulus spending. You can see evidence of the FDR spending today. Such as the Hoover Dam. But you can see little evidence from President Obama’s stimulus spending. For there are no Hoover Dams anywhere. Just a lot of empty buildings that housed failed green energy industries. With no new jobs to show for it. Such as those good-paying jobs in the green energy industry that President Obama promised his stimulus spending would produce. But, alas, it did not. In fact, that’s just one thing this administration is not good at. Creating jobs. Even the jobs they created appear suspect.
Employment in manufacturing increased in January (+21,000). Over the month, job gains occurred in machinery (+7,000), wood products (+5,000), and motor vehicles and parts (+5,000). Manufacturing added an average of 7,000 jobs per month in 2013.
In January, wholesale trade added 14,000 jobs, with most of the increase occurring in nondurable goods (+10,000).
Mining added 7,000 jobs in January, compared with an average monthly gain of 2,000 jobs in 2013…
Employment in other major industries, including transportation and warehousing, information, and financial activities, showed little or no change over the month.
These numbers don’t make sense. Much like Keynesian economics. The economy created jobs in manufacturing (machinery, wood products, motor vehicles and parts). Wholesale trade added jobs. Mining added jobs. But this new economic activity required no new financing. Which is odd. For it takes money to make money. Also, there were no new jobs in transportation and warehousing. Which begs the question. What did they do with all the stuff they made from all those new manufacturing jobs? Did it ever leave these factories? Or is there another explanation? Did the people who entered the labor force just replace people who left it? For no net change? Perhaps.
The manufacturing workweek declined by 0.2 hour to 40.7 hours, and factory overtime edged down by 0.1 hour to 3.4 hours.
Or perhaps this explains how they could add jobs in an industry that required no additional financing, transportation or warehousing. Hiring new workers while shortening the workweek and cutting back on overtime. Or a combination of this and people leaving the labor force to net out any economic gain from these new jobs. Whatever the explanation is one thing is certain. The economy is not improving. And President Obama’s economic recovery is on track to be the worst economic recovery in U.S. history. Despite the glowing jobs reports showing new job creation month after month. And a continuing falling unemployment. Things they can only show by not counting the 10 million or so who are no longer employed.
Tags: blacks, BLS, economic crisis, economic recovery, economy, employment, Employment Situation Summary, full time job, Great Depression, Great Recession, Hispanics, jobs, Keynesian, Keynesian economics, labor force, part-time job, President Obama, stimulus, stimulus spending, teenagers, underemployed, unemployed, unemployment, unemployment rate
Ten Different Obama Job Approval Polls show Higher Disapproves than Approves
President Obama did not have a good 2013. Especially near the end. Because of the Obamacare rollout. With the website being a disaster. The enrollment numbers weren’t as projected. Or needed. And then all the cancellations in the individual market. As people learned they couldn’t keep the policies and doctors they liked. Which gave President Obama the recognition for being the best in at least one thing. As PolitiFact named “if you like your health care plan, you can keep it” as the lie of the year.
The bad news continued into 2014. The Obamacare enrollee numbers didn’t improve. Most of the enrollees are the old and sick. Not the young and healthy the Obama administration told the health insurers would be enrolling. Which is breaking the economic model. Guaranteeing not only that health insurance premiums will rise. But some health care providers are actually requiring payment up front before providing services. As they are not sure what the insurers will pay. Making Obamacare an even bigger disaster. Which is a big factor in driving President Obama’s job approval rating down (see President Obama Job Approval posted on Real Clear Politics).
The ten polls included in the RCP Average all share one thing in common. They all have larger disapproval numbers than approval numbers. With the average disapproval number being 8.4 points greater than the average approval number. However you look at these numbers they are not good for President Obama. For they say President Obama has not been good for the United States.
People don’t Trust President Obama and are beginning to Doubt his Past Claims of Accomplishment
Growing numbers of people don’t trust the president anymore. Including those who were Obama supporters. Who because of the ‘lie of the year’ don’t look at those other scandals as opposition propaganda anymore. These scandals (Benghazi, IRS targeting conservatives, spying on journalists, spying on Americans, Fast and Furious, Solyndra, ‘recess’ appointments, executive orders to bypass the will of the people/Congress, etc.) are now just other things not to trust the president about. The president has been less than honest to get what he wants (power). While the American people don’t get what they want (jobs, affordable health care, etc.). And it’s because of this that his job approval has entered a steady decline.
Following a bump during the 2012 election Obama’s job approval has trended down. The Obama administration lied about what happened in Benghazi to help their reelection chances. Where the campaign message was that al Qaeda was on the run. Which is apparently why the State Department under Secretary Clinton denied Ambassador Steven’s request for additional security to combat the resurgent al Qaeda in Libya. As the recent bipartisan Senate report stated that the killing of four Americans in Benghazi on the anniversary of 9/11 could have been prevented.
Benghazi, the NSA spying on us, the ‘lie of the year’ and the other scandals have had their affect on the American people. And after the Target point-of-sale credit card hack people are very suspect of the Obamacare website. Especially when a security consulting firm says there is no security on the Obamacare website yet the Obama administration keeps telling us to trust them. They’ll keep our data safe. Even though Target couldn’t. And they have functioning security systems in place. Unlike Obamacare. That has none. So people don’t trust President Obama. And they’re beginning to doubt his past claims of accomplishment. As well as those rosy jobs reports from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
The Lie of the Year appears to have Broken the Spell Obama held over some of his Admirers
The Democrat’s Keynesian economic policies created yet another housing bubble. By keeping interest rates artificially low and relaxing credit standards they stimulated the housing market. And housing prices soared. But buyers didn’t seem to care. Because they were borrowing the money to buy these overpriced houses. Because of those low interest rates. Even people who couldn’t afford to buy a house were buying a house. Thanks to subprime lending like the adjustable rate mortgage (ARM). But when interest rates rose so did those monthly payments on those ARMs. People couldn’t afford their mortgage payments anymore. And defaulted. Giving us the subprime mortgage crisis. Which turned into the Great Recession.
The Democrats blamed the banks for the Great Recession. Not their Keynesian policies. Or President Clinton’s heavy hand on lenders to qualify the unqualified for mortgages (see Bill Clinton created the Subprime Mortgage Crisis with his Policy Statement on Discrimination in Lending posted 11/6/2011 on PITHOCRATES). Not only did they deflect blame for the crisis they used the crisis to implement further Keynesian policies. A near-trillion dollar stimulus bill. Much of which went to Obama’s ‘friends’ in the green energy industry. And to their friends in unions. The government spent a lot of money. They kept interest rates artificially low. And when that didn’t work they used quantitative easing. Basically printing money. The Obama administration said their policies were working. And declared the summer of 2010 ‘Recovery Summer’. The recession was over. Since then they highlighted the new jobs created with every jobs report. While ignoring the number of people who have left the labor force. Greatly skewing the numbers. And grossly understating the real unemployment rate (see Wall Street adviser: Actual unemployment is 37.2%, ‘misery index’ worst in 40 years by Paul Bedard posted 1/21/2014 on the Washington Examiner).
Don’t believe the happy talk coming out of the White House, Federal Reserve and Treasury Department when it comes to the real unemployment rate and the true “Misery Index.” Because, according to an influential Wall Street advisor, the figures are a fraud…
…the Misery Index, which is a calculation based in inflation and unemployment, both numbers the duo say are underscored by the government. He said that the Index doesn’t properly calculate how Uncle Sam is propping up the economy with bond purchases and other actions.
“These tricks, along with a host of other dubious accounting schemes, underreport inflation by about 3 percent,” they wrote, adding that the official inflation rate is just 1.24 percent.
“Today, the Misery Index would be 7.54 using official numbers,” they wrote. But if calculations tabulating the full national unemployment including discouraged workers, which is 10.2 percent, and the historical method of calculating inflation, which is now 4.5 percent, ‘the current misery index is closer to 14.7, worse even than during the Ford administration.”
The 1970s were the heyday of Keynesian economics. With spending out of control Richard Nixon did something that Keynesians longed for. He decoupled the dollar from gold. Allowing the Fed to print money like there was no tomorrow. Igniting inflation. And when the inflation rate was added to the unemployment rate it gave us a record Misery Index. Until now, that is. If you use the real data. And not the ‘massaged’ data that makes their Keynesian policies appear to be working. Telling us the recession ended in 2010. When many feel the Great Recession has never ended. Which is yet another reason not to trust the Obama administration. Or not approve of the job President Obama is doing. As the polls have been showing this past year. And it’s not just because of Obamacare. But the ‘lie of the year’ appears to have broken the spell he held over some of his admirers. Who can now see the king is wearing no clothes. No matter what his administration and those in the mainstream media say.
Tags: Al Qaeda, approval, Benghazi, disapproval, Great Recession, inflation, interest rates, job approval, jobs reports, Keynesian, Keynesian policies, lie of the year, misery index, Obama, Obama administration, Obamacare, Obamacare website, people don't trust President Obama, President Obama, President Obama job approval, recession, trust, unemployment, website
There was Much Spending in November where People Gathered to Celebrate the Thanksgiving Holiday
The Bureau of Labor Statistics November’s Employment Situation Summary is out. The government is trumpeting the 203,000 jobs created and the fall in the unemployment rate from 7.3% in October to 7.0%. Proof they say that the economy is turning around. And that their economic policies are working. So everything is coming up roses. If you stop reading the Employment Situation Summary there, that is. For if you read further the economy is still horrible.
A big part of this improvement was the furloughed federal workers returning to work after the government shutdown. And the Thanksgiving Holiday. With retail hiring seasonal employees and stocking their shelves for the kick off of the Christmas shopping season. This year starting on Thanksgiving Day for many retailers. So you would expect a gain in employment connected to the Christmas shopping season. Which there has been. Retail trade employment added 22,000 jobs. And leisure and hospitality, employment in food services and drinking places added 18,000 jobs. And air transportation added 3,000 jobs. Thanks to the biggest travel day of the year falling in November.
So there was much spending where people gathered with friends and family to celebrate the Thanksgiving holiday. And the mad rush to the stores to begin their Christmas shopping. There was much traveling, shopping and dining in November. As there always is. Though some years are better than others. There was also new hiring in the automobile and construction industries. Probably more due to the near-zero interest rates thanks to the Federal Reserve’s quantitative easing. Basically printing money to drive down interest rates. To encourage people to buy big ticket items like cars and houses. Even though they had no plans to do so.
It is only the Decline in the Number of People in the Labor Force that gives us an Improving Unemployment Rate
So new jobs in these areas don’t reflect on the overall economic climate. Because once Christmas is over business will lay off those they hired for those seasonal jobs. And once the Federal Reserve stops ‘printing money’ those interest rates will rise. Perhaps compounded by runaway inflation from so much printing. So these aren’t good indicators of the economy. We can gain a better understanding by looking at the higher stages of production. Where there are large capital outlays required to hire and expand business. Industries that look at the long-term. So if they’re not hiring they’re not optimistic about the long-term economic picture.
A lot of economic activity has to happen before a retail store can sell anything. Raw material industries have to pull resources out of the environment. Industrial processors have to transform these raw materials so manufacturers can use them. And once manufacturers build things wholesalers buy them and resell them to retailers. That’s a lot of costs these industries have to incur to produce things that may sell 6-9 months later. Or longer. And if the economy is looking anemic to them they are not going to incur these costs. Which is what happened in November with some of these higher stages of production. Mining, logging and wholesale trade showed little to no change.
The civilian labor force declined by 720,000 in October. With the government shutdown blamed for a lot of these lost jobs. So when the government opened for business again in November we should have seen a large increase in the civilian labor force. But we didn’t. The civilian labor force only increased by 455,000 in November. Which means that if you factor out the government shutdown there was still a decline in the number of jobs. And it is only this decline in the number of people in the labor force that gives us an improving unemployment rate. For once people give up and quit looking for a job because the economy is so bad the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) stops counting them. Skewing the real unemployment rate.
The Current Economic Recovery is a False One created with the Smoke and Mirrors of Low Interest Rates
This gets to the crux of the Obama economic recovery. Or, rather, the absence of any recovery. The government trumpets the creation of 195,000 new jobs per month this year. But they don’t tell us how many jobs we lost per month this year. Which we can calculate. In January of this year there were 89,009,000 people not in the labor force. In November that number rose to 91,273,000. A total loss of 2,265,000 jobs this year. Or a loss of 205,909 each month. So while they cheerfully report the creation of 195,000 new jobs per month we actually lost 205,909 jobs each month. If you count those people who left the labor force the BLS doesn’t count when calculating the unemployment rate. In fact, if you look at the trends this year you can see the trends are going in the wrong direction.
The most shocking thing about this chart is that there are over 91 million people not in the labor force. The labor force is the sum of the employed and unemployed persons. So these are people who could be in the labor force but aren’t. Because they don’t have a job. For whatever reason. On welfare, collecting disability, early retirement, just can’t get a job because the economy is so bad, etc. So there will always be people out of the labor force. And a large number is bad. Because these people aren’t helping to create economic activity. Which is why the Obama recovery is so anemic.
What’s also shocking about this chart are the trends. The official unemployment rate has been falling. Good news, yes? Well, as it turns out, no. Because the number of people not in the labor force has been rising during the decline in the unemployment rate. Making the unemployment numbers questionable at best. For you can’t have less unemployment if people continue to leave the workforce because they can’t get a job. And the employment picture isn’t getting better. It’s getting worse. And it’s going to keep getting worse until those higher stages of production start hiring. Which they won’t do until they see a real economic recovery. And not a false one created with the smoke and mirrors of low interest rates.
Tags: BLS, Christmas, Christmas shopping, Christmas shopping season, civilian labor force, economic climate, economic recovery, Employment Situation Summary, Federal Reserve, government shutdown, higher stages of production, interest rates, jobs, jobs created, labor force, manufacturers, November, printing money, raw materials, retail, retailers, seasonal employees, shopping, Thanksgiving, unemployment, unemployment rate, wholesale, wholesalers
Week in Review
The American left is hammering millennials. The young people. Teenagers to thirty-somethings. A strong demographic for the American left. But they are just beating them up. The latest being the punishing blows of the Affordable Care Act (i.e., Obamacare). Which transfers the cost of the old and sick to them. By forcing them to buy costly health insurance policies that they can’t afford. Because the millennials are suffering the highest unemployment rates in the worst economic recovery since that following the Great Depression.
The economic policies of the Obama administration have forced over ten million people out of the labor force since Obama became president. With this destruction of jobs the millennials graduating with a college degree can’t find a job. At least not one using their degree. That they financed with a large student loan. And ended up working someplace that doesn’t require that costly degree. Making far less than they expected when they took on all that student loan debt. Leaving them struggling to repay that debt.
And if that wasn’t bad enough they encouraged them to go to college. To get a college degree so they can make the big bucks after graduation. They even took over the student loan program to make it easier to give these kids college loans. The problem is that a lot of them did go to college. But they got degrees like these (see College Majors That are Too Cool for School posted 12/8/2013 on Fact University).
Comic Book Art, Adventure Education, Cannabis Cultivation, Bowling Industry Management, Motorsports Science and Engineering, Winemaking, Folklore and Mythology, Comedy: Writing and Performance, Diving Business and Technology, Beatles Historian, Theme Park Engineer, Puppetry, Popular Culture, Entertainment Engineering & Design and Sexuality.
Is it any wonder the millennials are suffering some of the highest unemployment? And why businesses have to use the visa program to get foreign college graduates to fill their science and engineering needs?
Our colleges and universities are giving our kids worthless degrees in a high-tech economy. And it’s these degrees that the Democrats have been floating the idea of forgiving that student loan debt for. After getting that money to their friends in higher education so they can mold their students into future Democrat voters. And giving these kids 4 years of partying while working on degrees that are just too cool for school. Guaranteeing a Democrat vote from each of them. Until they grow up and experience the real world.
Tags: American Left, college degree, Democrats, job, millennials, Obamacare, student loan, unemployment
The Democrats used the Power of the Purse to oppose the Reagan Agenda wherever they Could
The left hated President Reagan. They called him just a “B” movie actor. With many references to Bedtime for Bonzo. With the implication that Reagan was a chimpanzee. He was called stupid. Senile. And they said he hated the poor. The usual stuff when it comes to Democrats calling the opposition names. But as about as demeaning as it gets. For the Democrats hated Ronald Reagan with a passion. They may have hated him even more than George W. Bush. Another president they called stupid. Even making similar chimpanzee references.
They fought Reagan tooth and nail. The Democrats held the House and they used the power of the purse to oppose the Reagan agenda wherever they could. So Reagan had to compromise on some things. Especially tax hikes. But for the most part he kept his word to the American people. And maintained high approval ratings. Making it harder for the Democrats to block all of the Reagan agenda. Which just made the left hate him more.
It’s funny the short memories Democrats have. For any criticism of President Obama is met with charges of racism. And because of that few criticize him. Because no one wants to be called a racist. Giving President Obama a free pass for most if his presidency. Something neither George W. Bush nor Ronald Reagan ever enjoyed. Yet the left says the right says the most vile things about President Obama. Unprecedented things. Like calling him a liar when he lied during the State of the Union Address. Which must be different from saying ‘Bush lied people died’ over and over again.
President Obama is on Pace to add more Debt than Ronald Reagan
Among the terrible things the left said Ronald Reagan was doing was running up the debt to unsustainable levels. And he did run up the debt. About 99.4% during his 8 years. Or about 12.4% a year. Much of that spending, though, was to reverse the damage Jimmy Carter did to national defense. He had gutted defense spending so much (cancelling bombers and missile programs) that the Soviet Union thought for the first time that they could win a nuclear war against the United States. At least with Jimmy Carter as president. They actually started drafting nuclear first-strike plans to replace the deterrence of mutually assured destruction (MAD). Anyway, that spending led to the collapse of the Soviet Union. Allowing the U.S. to win the Cold War. Giving Bill Clinton a huge peace dividend during his presidency.
Bill Clinton wanted to nationalize health care. And it didn’t go over well. His big spending liberal agenda got neutered at the midterm elections. As he angered the people so much the Republicans won both the House and Senate. Forcing Clinton to the center. Dropping any thoughts of national health care. With Republicans even forcing welfare reform on him. The Republican Revolution kept spending down. And the debt only grew 13.6% during Clinton’s 8 years. Or about 1.7% a year.
After the 9/11 terrorist attacks George W. Bush ramped up military spending. For national security. And two wars. He also ramped up domestic spending. Giving us Medicare Part D. A program to subsidize the prescription drugs for Medicare recipients. In the 8 years of the Bush presidency he added about 41.4% to the national debt. About 5.2% a year. Which sounded like a lot until President Obama came along. A near trillion dollar stimulus bill that stimulated little. Investments into failed solar power companies and electric car companies. Automotive (i.e., union pension fund) bailouts. In his 5 years in office Obama has raised the debt by 53.8%. Or 10.8% each of his 5 years. A little more than twice the rate of George W. Bush. At this pace he will even add more debt than Ronald Reagan. Adding up to 18.3% per year (over 8 years) if no one stops his spending.
Under President Obama the Gap between Black and White Unemployment grew Greater
President Obama said those ‘wise’ investments and higher taxes on those who could afford to pay a little more would generate economic activity. His income redistribution would balance the playing field. And raise the poor out of poverty. While people everywhere celebrated the first black president. For it would bring the races together. This is why some on the right joked that President Obama was the messiah. Because he was going to do all of that. As well as make the ocean levels fall. Black America especially loved the nation’s first black president. As 95% of the black vote went to Obama in 2008. Though the enthusiasm waned a bit in 2012. As only 93% of the black vote went to Obama. And how has black American done under the Obama economic policies. Well, not as good as they did under the Bush economic policies (see archived data from Table A-2. Employment status of the civilian population by race, sex, and age in the Employment Situation Archived News Releases by the Bureau of Labor Statistics).
The Great Recession officially ran from December 2007 to June 2009. Which corresponds to the transition from George W. Bush to Barack Obama. People often call the Great Recession the worst recession since the Great Depression. Of course they say that primarily because the current economic recovery is the worst since that following the Great Depression. And the reason for that is President Obama’s economic policies.
Unemployment was lower for everyone under Bush. On average the unemployment rate for white/black men, women and 16-19 year olds under Bush was 4.2%/9.3%, 4.0%/8.2% and 14.7%/31.1%, respectively. Under President Obama these numbers jumped to 7.8%/15.7%, 6.7%/12.2% and 21.8%/40.3%. Which should give black America cause for concern. For under President Obama the gap between black and white unemployment grew greater. The gap between black and white men went from 5.1 to 7.9. An increase of 55.6%. The gap between black and white women went from 4.2 to 5.5. An increase of 32.9%. And the gap between black and white 16 to 19 year olds went from 16.5 to 18.5. An increase of 12.7%. So whatever President Obama is doing it isn’t helping America find work. Especially black America.
Tags: Bill Clinton, black America, black vote, Bush, Clinton, criticism, debt, defense spending, Democrats, first black president, George W. Bush, Great Depression, Great Recession, Jimmy Carter, nationalize health care, nuclear, Obama, power of the purse, President Obama, President Reagan, racism, Reagan, Reagan agenda, Republicans, Ronald Reagan, Soviet Union, unemployment
What doesn’t Kill You Makes you Stronger
They say what doesn’t kill you makes you stronger. And you can see that in military basic training. There have been some good movies showing what military basic training is like. Perhaps one of the best is Full Metal Jacket. Where Gunnery Sergeant Hartman played by R. Lee Ermey wasn’t acting as much as reliving his days as a Marine Corps drill instructor. Watching it you may come to hate Sergeant Hartman for he was pretty sadistic. But they didn’t design basic training to be a pleasant experience. They designed it to prepare recruits for the worst thing in the world. War.
In the miniseries Band of Brothers we follow Easy Company, 2nd Battalion, 506th Parachute Infantry Regiment, 101st Airborne Division, from basic training through D-Day and to the end of the war. Airborne training followed basic training. And was harder. Fewer people make it through airborne training than they do basic training. Ranger training is even harder. And fewer people make it through Ranger training. But airborne units and Rangers get the more difficult missions in combat. Because they can do more. For their training is more difficult. But it didn’t kill them. So it made them stronger.
Perhaps the most difficult military training is the Navy’s SEAL program. Where if they get a good class of recruits they may have 1 in 10 complete training. For it is that hard. In fact, some have died in training because they refused to give up. That’s why you will find few tougher than a Navy SEAL. They are tough. And they never quit. Which is why we give them the most difficult missions to complete. Missions that others would find impossible. Proving that the more brutal and difficult training is the stronger and more able we get.
During the 20th Century the American Left has tried to replace Rugged Individualism with the Nanny State
Those who founded this nation were tough people who worked hard and never gave up. They provided their own housing, food, clothing, etc. If they needed something they figured out how to provide it for themselves. They worked long hours. Survived brutal winters and hostile environments. But they never gave up. In fact, they raised families while doing all of this. With no help from government. As there were no government benefits. Yet they survived. Even prospered. For what didn’t kill them only made them stronger. These rugged individuals could do anything. And did. Which is why the United States is the leader of the free world. And the world’s number one economy. Because of that rugged individualism.
This is the way America was before the progressives came and softened us. And made rugged individualism somehow a bad thing. Beginning with Woodrow Wilson. Then FDR. LBJ. And then President Obama. A long line of American presidents who eschewed individualism. And thought in collective terms. When the Americans rejected socialism they gave us progressivism. When we rejected communism they gave us liberalism. The 20th century has been a tireless attempt for those on the left to replace rugged individualism with the nanny state. With their brilliant selves in power. Managing the economy. And making life fair. To undo the unfairness of laissez-faire capitalism. To make the United States better. And more according to their vision. Just like the socialists did. And the communists did. Yet no socialist or communist state became the leader of the free world. Or the world’s number one economy.
Those who lived in those socialist and communist utopias learned one thing. It was better to live someplace else. And their ultimate destination? The United States. Yet those on the left refused to believe that life was worse in those states where they put people first instead of profits. Like that unfeeling and cruel laissez-faire capitalism did. Which is why Wilson, FDR, LBJ and Obama worked tirelessly to move the United States in the direction of socialism and communism. Because they cared for the people. Or the power they got by making so many people dependent on government.
Someone receiving a Comfortable Level of Benefits will not be pushed to Leave their Comfort Zone
So is it about the power or that thing about helping people? What is it exactly that progressives/liberals really want? Well, we can look at the historical record to determine that. By looking at a point in time when America really changed. With the assassination of JFK. JFK’s chances of reelection weren’t great. Which is why he went to Texas. As he needed LBJ to deliver Texas to the Democrats. Instead of electoral victory, though, he fell to an assassin’s bullet. The great outpouring of grief and love for their fallen president exceeded the love he got before the assassination. The heightened emotions allowed LBJ to pass the many programs of the Great Society into law. In the memory of JFK. The greatest expansion of the federal government since FDR’s New Deal. Making the welfare state the largest yet. In an attempt to put people first. Not profits. In fact, LBJ declared a war on poverty. By providing government assistance to lift everyone out of poverty. And he championed civil rights. LBJ was going to make the United States that utopia socialists and communists always dreamt about. For everyone. Blacks. And whites. Especially blacks. Who were suffering great discrimination then. But things would be different for them. Starting in the Sixties everything was going to get better. And how are blacks doing today? Well, if you use employment as a measure, not good (see Table A-2. Employment status of the civilian population by race, sex, and age by the Bureau of Labor Statistics)
The federal government has done a lot for blacks. More than any other minority group. Affirmative Action was to correct all past wrongs. By making it easier to get into college. And to get a job. Yet we don’t see that when looking at the unemployment numbers. In fact, the group the government does the least for—white men—is doing the best. They don’t need any help because they won life’s lottery. By being born white. According to liberals. So there’s no Affirmative Action for them. Yet they have half the unemployment rate black men have. While white women have half the unemployment rate black women have. And white 16-19 year olds have half the unemployment rate black 16-19 year olds have. Brilliant progressives/liberals have been trying to make life better for blacks for 50 some years now and have failed. Despite this blacks have never been more loyal to them. Which answers the question what the Democrats care more for. The people? Or the power the people give them. By getting them dependent on government. Who they tell over and over again that they would have nothing if it weren’t for them. The Democrats. For blacks just can’t make it on their own without help. Even though after receiving all of that help blacks are suffering the greatest levels of unemployment. Clearly something isn’t right here. And it goes back to that thing that made America great. Rugged individualism.
You know what the difference is between a white SEAL and a black SEAL? Nothing. Blacks have equality of opportunity in SEAL training. And that’s all they need. They don’t need special treatment. And the Navy doesn’t tell them that they do. All they need is the strength. And the will. Which will be there if you don’t keep telling people that they can’t succeed without the government’s help. Because if you keep doing that they will come to believe that. And they will keep voting Democrat. Looking for help. Whereas those who face adversity and overcome it grow stronger. Because what doesn’t kill them makes them stronger.
Handing out government benefits will make people like you. But it won’t get them a job. For someone receiving a comfortable level of benefits will not be pushed to leave their comfort zone. And while they languish in their comfort zone they will not gain work experience. Allowing others to gain experience and move up in their careers. Making them more employable. While those with less experience and less education are less employable. And that’s what Democrats do when they buy votes with government benefits. Make people less employable. And blacks have been especially useful to them. As they can stoke the fires of racism to drive blacks even further to the Democrat Party. By calling Republicans racists. Because they want to take away their benefits. Just because they hate black people. Or so goes the Democrat line. So they keep voting Democrat. While losing their rugged individualism. And suffering higher levels of unemployment than everyone else.
Tags: affirmative action, airborne, basic training, comfort zone, Communism, Communist, Democrats, FDR, federal government, government benefits, individualism, JFK, laissez faire capitalism, LBJ, liberalism, liberals, nanny state, Navy SEAL, President Obama, Progressives, progressivism, put people first, Ranger, rugged individualism, SEAL, socialism, socialist, unemployment, welfare state, what doesn't kill you makes you stronger, Wilson
Just-in-Time Delivery lowers Inventory Costs but risks Manufacturing Interruptions
Carrying a large inventory is costly. And risky. First of all you have to warehouse it. In a secured heated (and sometimes cooled) building. With a fire alarm system. A fire suppression (i.e., sprinkler) system. A security alarm system. You need lighting. And people. Safety training. Safety equipment. Forklifts. Loading docks. Delivery trucks. Insurances. Property taxes (real and personal). Utilities. Telephone and Internet. A computer inventory system. Etc. It adds up. And the larger the inventory the larger the cost.
Then there are the risks. Fire damage. Theft. Water damage (say from a fire suppression line that freezes during the winter because some kid broke a window to let freezing air in that froze the water inside the sprinkler line with the expanding ice breaking the pipe and allowing water to flow out of the pipe onto your inventory). Shrinkage (things that disappear but weren’t sold). Damaged goods (say a forklift operator accidentally backed into a shelve full of plasma displays). Shifts in consumer demand (what was once hot may not be hot anymore which is a costly problem when you have a warehouse full of that stuff). Etc. And the larger the inventory the greater the risks.
In the latter half of the 20th century a new term entered the business lexicon. Just-in-time delivery. Or JIT for short. Instead of warehousing material needed for manufacturing manufacturers turned to JIT. And tight schedules. They bought what they needed as they needed it. Having it arrive just as it was needed in the manufacturing process. JIT greatly cut costs. But it allowed any interruption in those just-in-time deliveries shut down manufacturing. As there was no inventory to feed manufacturing if a delivery did not arrive just in time.
A Rising Inventory to Sales Ratio means Inventory is Growing Larger or Sales are Falling
There are many financial ratios we use to judge how well a business is performing. One of them is the inventory to sales ratio. Which is the inventory on hand divided by the sales that inventory generated. If this number equals ‘1’ then the inventory on hand for a given period is sold before that period is up. Which would be very efficient inventory management. Unless a lot of sales were lost because some things were out of stock because so few of them were in inventory.
Ideally managers would like this number to be ‘1’. For that would have the lowest cost of carrying inventory. If you sold one item 4 times a month you could add one to inventory each week to replace the one sold that week. That would be very efficient. Unless four people want to buy this item in the same week. Which means instead of selling 4 of these items you will probably only sell one. For the other three people may just go to a different store that does have it in stock. So it is a judgment call. You have to carry more than you may sell because people don’t come in at evenly spaced intervals to buy things.
We can look at the inventory to sales ratio for the general economy over time to note trends. A falling ratio is generally good. For it shows inventories growing as a lesser rate than sales. Meaning that businesses are getting more sales out of reduced inventory levels. Which means more profits. A flat trend could mean that businesses are operating at peak efficiency. Or they are treading water due to uncertainty in the business climate. Doing the minimum to meet their current demand. But not growing because there is too much uncertainty in the air. A rising ratio is not good. For the only way for that to happen is if inventory is growing larger. Sales are falling. Or both.
The Labor Force Participation Rate has been in a Freefall since President Obama took Office
When inventories start rising it is typically because sales are falling. Businesses are making their usually buys to restock inventory. Only people aren’t buying as much as they once were. So with people buying less sales fall and inventories grow. Rising inventories are often an indicator of a recession. As unemployment rises there are fewer people going to stores to buy things. So sales fall. After a period or two of this when businesses see that falling sales was not just an aberration for one period but a sign of worse economic times to come they cut back their buying. Draw down their inventories. And lay off some workers to adjust for the weaker demand. As they do their suppliers see a fall in their sales and do likewise. All the way up the stages of production to raw material extraction.
Retailers typically carry larger inventories than wholesalers or manufacturers. To try and accommodate their diverse customer base. So when their sales fall and their inventories rise they are left with bulging inventories that are costly to store in a warehouse. They may start cutting prices to move this inventory. Or pray for some government help. Such as low interest rates to get people to buy things even when it may not be in their best interest (for people tend to get laid off in a recession and having a new car payment while unemployed takes a lot of joy out of having a new car). Or a government stimulus program. Make-work for the unemployed. Or even cash benefits the unemployed can spend. Which will provide a surge in economic activity at the consumer level as retailers and wholesalers unload backed up inventory. But it rarely creates any new jobs. Because government stimulus eventually runs out. And once it does the people will leave the stores again. So retailers may benefit and to a certain degree wholesalers as they can clear out their inventories. But manufacturers and raw material extractors adjust to the new reality. As retail sales fall retailers and wholesalers will need less inventory. Which means manufacturers and raw material extractors ramp down to adjust to the lower demand. Cutting their costs so their reduced revenue can cover them. Which means laying off workers. We can see this when we look at inventory to sales ratio and the labor force participation rate over time.
(There appears to be a problem with the latest version of this blogging software that is preventing the insertion of this chart into this post. Please click on this link to see the chart.)
(Sources: Inventories/Sales Ratio, Archived News Releases)
Cheap money gave us irrational exuberance and the dot-com bubble in the Nineties. And a recession in the early 2000s. Note that the trend during the Nineties was a falling inventory to sales ratio as advanced computer inventory systems tied in over the Internet took inventory management to new heights. But as the dot-com irrational exuberance came to a head we had a huge dot-com economy that had yet to start selling anything. As their start-up capital ran out the dot-coms began to go belly-up. And all those programmers who flooded our colleges in the Nineties to get their computer degrees lost their high paying jobs. Stock prices fell out of the sky as companies went bankrupt. Resulting in a bad recession. The fall in spending can be seen in the uptick in the inventory to sales ratio. This fall in spending (and rise in inventories) led to a lot of people losing their jobs. As we can see in the falling labor force participation rate. The ensuing recession was compounded by the terrorist attacks on 9/11.
Things eventually stabilized but there was more irrational exuberance in the air. Thanks to a housing policy that put people into houses they couldn’t afford with subprime mortgages. Which lenders did under threat from the Clinton administration (see Bill Clinton created the Subprime Mortgage Crisis with his Policy Statement on Discrimination in Lending posted 11/6/2011 on Pithocrates). Note the huge spike in the inventory to sales ratio. And the free-fall of the labor force participation rate. Which hasn’t stopped falling since President Obama took office. Even though the inventory to sales ratio returned to pre-Great Recession levels. But there is so much uncertainty in the economic outlook that no one is hiring. They’re just shedding jobs. Making the Obama economic recovery the worst since that following the Great Depression.
Tags: consumer, consumer demand, costs, demand, dot.com, inventories, inventory, inventory to sales ratio, irrational exuberance, JIT, jobs, just-in-time delivery, labor force participation rate, manufacturers, manufacturing, raw material extraction, recession, retailers, sales, stimulus, subprime mortgage, uncertainty, unemployment, warehouse, wholesalers
Week in Review
There are millions of transgender people who are being discriminated against in the workplace just as there are millions of people signing up for Obamacare. President Obama can say both. But even he must know neither is true (see Senate passes LGBT anti-discrimination bill by Leigh Ann Caldwell posted 11/8/2013 on CNN).
For the first time, the U.S. Senate approved legislation that would protect gay, lesbian and transgender employees from discrimination in the workplace…
Opposition in the Republican-controlled House is strong, minimizing any chance the measure will become law. House Speaker John Boehner also opposes it.
Still, President Barack Obama urged the House to take the bill up and said he would sign it.
“One party in one house of Congress should not stand in the way of millions of Americans who want to go to work each day and simply be judged by the job they do,” the President said in a statement. “Now is the time to end this kind of discrimination in the workplace, not enable it. I urge the House Republican leadership to bring this bill to the floor for a vote and send it to my desk so I can sign it into law.”
The bill would provide the same protections for LGBT workers as are already guaranteed on the basis of race, gender and religion.
It would not be lawful for employers to discriminate based on a person’s “actual or perceived” sexual orientation or gender identity…
“The Speaker believes this legislation will increase frivolous litigation and cost American jobs, especially small business jobs,” Boehner’s spokesman, Michael Steel, said.
Millions? That must mean there are more than 2 million transgender people in the United States trying to get a job as this law basically adds “a person’s “actual or perceived” sexual orientation or gender identity” to a long list of federal protections. According to a study by the Williams Institute only about 0.3% of adults are transgender. According to the U.S. Census Bureau the U.S. population is about 313.9 million. If we subtract those under 18 years of age (23.5%) and retirees (13.7%) from the total population that leaves 197.1 million people of working age. Of this 197.1 million only 591,414 are transgender according to the Williams Institute study. Which is 0.19% of the total population. In comparison the latest Employment Situation Summary from the BLS shows the official unemployment rate (U-3) is 7.3%. While the more accurate unemployment rate that counts all people who can’t find a job is at 13.8%. But the more accurate picture of the economy is the labor force participation rate. Which is now at 62.8%. Meaning that there are 91.5 million people who have left the labor force because they can’t get a job.
There are not millions of transgender people being discriminated against in the workplace. As there are only about a half million people who call themselves transgender in the nation. But there are 91.5 million people who can’t find a job. Perhaps that is the problem Congress should be working on. Rolling back one of the most business-unfriendly environments ever to exist in the U.S. To create jobs for the 91.5 million. As well as the half million.
This legislation is, obviously, a political maneuver. The Senate passed this bill so it can die in the House. So they can say, “See? House Republicans hate LGBT people.” Which is how the left wins elections. By making their base hate Republicans. Which is why President Obama was able to win reelection despite his policies keeping 91.5 million people out of a job. Despite a part of his base—the young—suffering the highest levels of unemployment. But they will continue to suffer and vote Democrat. Because Republicans hate LGBT people. Even if it’s not true. As long as there is a perception of it that’s good enough for them. Even though it would be easier for LBGT people to get a job if there weren’t 91.5 million people on line looking for a job.
Tags: business-unfriendly environment, discrimination, gender identity, hate Republicans, House, LGBT, Republican, Senate, transgender, unemployment
(Originally published September 18th, 2012)
Under the Bretton Woods System the Americans promised to Exchange their Gold for Dollars at $35 per Ounce
Wars are expensive. All kinds. The military kind. As well as the social kind. And the Sixties gave us a couple of doozies. The Vietnam War. And the War on Poverty. Spending in Vietnam started in the Fifties. But spending, as well as troop deployment, surged in the Sixties. First under JFK. Then under LBJ. They added this military spending onto the Cold War spending. Then LBJ declared a war on poverty. And all of this spending was on top of NASA trying to put a man on the moon. Which was yet another part of the Cold War. To beat the Soviets to the moon after they beat us in orbit.
This was a lot of spending. And it carried over into the Seventies. Giving President Nixon a big problem. As he also had a balance of payments deficit. And a trade deficit. Long story short Nixon was running out of money. So they started printing it. Which caused another problem as the US was still part of the Bretton Woods system. A quasi gold standard. Where the US pegged the dollar to gold at $35 per ounce. Which meant when they started printing dollars the money supply grew greater than their gold supply. And depreciated the dollar. Which was a problem because under Bretton Woods the Americans promised to exchange their gold for dollars at $35 per ounce.
When other nations saw the dollar depreciate so that it would take more and more of them to buy an ounce of gold they simply preferred having the gold instead. Something the Americans couldn’t depreciate. Nations exchanged their dollars for gold. And began to leave the Bretton Woods system. Nixon had a choice to stop this gold outflow. He could strengthen the dollar by reducing the money supply (i.e., stop printing dollars) and cut spending. Or he could ‘close the gold window’ and decouple the dollar from gold. Which is what he did on August 15, 1971. And shocked the international financial markets. Hence the name the Nixon Shock.
When the US supported Israel in the Yom Kippur War the Arab Oil Producers responded with an Oil Embargo
Without the restraint of gold preventing the printing of money the Keynesians were in hog heaven. As they hated the gold standard. The suspension of the convertibility of gold ushered in the heyday of Keynesian economics. Even Nixon said, “I am now a Keynesian in economics.” The US had crossed the Rubicon. Inflationary Keynesian policies were now in charge of the economy. And they expanded the money supply. Without restraint. For there was nothing to fear. No consequences. Just robust economic activity. Of course OPEC didn’t see it that way.
Part of the Bretton Woods system was that other nations used the dollar as a reserve currency. Because it was as good as gold. As our trading partners could exchange $35 for an ounce of gold. Which is why we priced international assets in dollars. Like oil. Which is why OPEC had a problem with the Nixon Shock. The dollars they got for their oil were rapidly becoming worth less than they once were. Which greatly reduced what they could buy with those dollars. The oil exporters were losing money with the American devaluation of the dollar. So they raised the price of oil. A lot. Basically pricing it at the current value of gold in US dollars. Meaning the more they depreciated the dollar the higher the price of oil went. As well as gas prices.
With the initial expansion of the money supply there was short-term economic gain. The boom. But shortly behind this inflationary gain came higher prices. And a collapse in economic activity. The bust. This was the dark side of Keynesian economics. Higher prices that pushed economies into recessions. And to make matters worse Americans were putting more of their depreciated dollars into the gas tank. And the Keynesians said, “No problem. We can fix this with some inflation.” Which they tried to by expanding the money supply further. Meanwhile, Egypt and Syria attacked Israel on October 6, 1973, kicking off the Yom Kippur War. And when the US supported their ally Israel the Arab oil producers responded with an oil embargo. Reducing the amount of oil entering America, further raising prices. And causing gas lines as gas stations ran out of gas. (In part due to Nixon’s price controls that did not reset demand via higher prices to the reduced supply. And a ceiling on domestic oil prices discouraged any domestic production.) The Yom Kippur War ended about 20 days later. Without a major change in borders. With an Israeli agreement to pull their forces back to the east side of the Suez Canal the Arab oil producers (all but Libya) ended their oil embargo in March of 1974.
It was Morning in America thanks to the Abandonment of Keynesian Inflationary Policies
So oil flowed into the US again. But the economy was still suffering from high unemployment. Which the Keynesians fixed with some more inflation. With another burst of monetary expansion starting around 1975. To their surprise, though, unemployment did not fall. It just raised prices. Including oil prices. Which increased gas prices. The US was suffering from high unemployment and high inflation. Which wasn’t supposed to happen in Keynesian economics. Even their Phillips Curve had no place on its graph for this phenomenon. The Keynesians were dumfounded. And the American people suffered through the malaise of stagflation. And if things weren’t bad enough the Iranians revolted and the Shah of Iran (and US ally) stepped down and left the country. Disrupting their oil industry. And then President Carter put a halt to Iranian oil imports. Bringing on the 1979 oil crisis.
This crisis was similar to the previous one. But not quite as bad. As it was only Iranian oil being boycotted. But there was some panic buying. And some gas lines again. But Carter did something else. He began to deregulate oil prices over a period of time. It wouldn’t help matters in 1979 but it did allow the price of crude oil to rise in the US. Drawing the oil rigs back to the US. Especially in Alaska. Also, the Big Three began to make smaller, more fuel efficient cars. These two events would combine with another event to bring down the price of oil. And the gasoline we made from that oil.
Actually, there was something else President Carter did that would also affect the price of oil. He appointed Paul Volcker Chairman of the Federal Reserve in August of 1979. He was the anti-Keynesian. He raised interest rates to contract the money supply and threw the country into a steep recession. Which brought prices down. Wringing out the damage of a decade’s worth of inflation. When Ronald Reagan won the 1980 presidency he kept Volcker as Chairman. And suffered through a horrible 2-year recession. But when they emerged it was Morning in America. They had brought inflation under control. Unemployment fell. The economy rebounded thanks to Reagan’s tax cuts. And the price of oil plummeted. Thanks to the abandonment of Keynesian inflationary policies. And the abandonment of oil regulation. As well as the reduction in demand (due to those smaller and more fuel efficient cars). Which created a surge in oil exploration and production that resulted in an oil glut in the Eighties. Bringing the price oil down to almost what it was before the two oil shocks.
Tags: $35 per ounce, Bretton Woods, Carter, depreciated dollars, dollar, gas prices, gold standard, inflation, Iran, Israel, Keynesian economics, Keynesians, monetary expansion, money supply, Morning in America, Nixon, Nixon Shock, oil, oil embargo, oil exporters, oil prices, oil producers, oil shock, OPEC, Paul Volcker, printing money, Reagan, recession, Ronald Reagan, stagflation, unemployment, Volcker, Yom Kippur War
« Previous Entries