Lawyers make a lot of Money without Contributing anything Tangible to Society
An attorney was sitting in his office late one night when Satan appeared before him. Satan said, “I have a proposition for you. You can win every case you try for the rest of your life. Your clients will adore you, your colleagues will stand in awe of you and you will make embarrassing sums of money. All I want in exchange is your soul, your wife’s soul, your children’s souls, the souls of your parents, grandparents, parents-in-law, the souls of all your friends and law partners.” The lawyer thought about this for a moment then asked, “So, what’s the catch?”
That’s funny, isn’t it? Lawyers. Ambulance chasers. The butt of so many jokes. Why? Well, some will say they deserve it. Because they do chase ambulances. And will pass out their business cards if they’re on a sinking ship. Because sinking ships are good for lawsuits. And lawyers love to sue. For they can make a lot of money without contributing anything tangible to society. All they do is get between two parties when large sums of money change hands. And put a portion of that money into their pockets. That’s how they earn their living. Taking money away from others. They’re parasites. Just to get rich. And the big tort lawyers (those who sue people and businesses) get really rich. Allowing them to live very privileged lives.
Take a class action lawsuit. Where they bring a lot of wronged people together to sue a large corporation. The old David and Goliath thing. A little person can never take on a big corporation. But a whole class of them can. When represented by a tort lawyer. Who liken themselves as heroes of the little guy. Taking the big corporation on to make them pay for all the horrible things they’ve done to their clients. But who do they really help? Let’s say they win a judgment from a big corporation of $250,000,000. That’s a lot of money. From that sum they take their cut. Let’s say 50%. Leaving $125 million for the people the corporation wronged. That’s a lot of money. So the people won, too, right? Not really. For there are a lot of people represented in these class actions. Let’s say 5 million in our example. So if you divide the $125 million by 5 million that comes to $25 per person. So, again, who did the lawyers really help? The lawyers. Which is why there are so many lawyer jokes.
In the Private Sector if you want to spend Half of your Life Retired you have to Pay for It
Lawyers vote Democrat. Because they like being privileged people. They don’t want the laws changing that allow them to get so rich when money exchanges hands. Which is why they donate heavily to the Democrat Party. And don’t donate to the Republicans. Who complain about the high costs of frivolous lawsuits to businesses in an overly litigious society. It’s so bad that a footnote in the financial statements of a corporation about a lawsuit is not that big of a deal. Why? Because so many corporations are sued that investors are more surprised to see one that isn’t being sued. This is why Republicans want tort reform. And pass ‘loser-pays’ into law. Like many other countries have. Where the loser in court pays for the attorney fees for the side that wins. Which would greatly cut down on frivolous lawsuits. And cut the costs businesses incur from these frivolous lawsuits that they pass on to their customers. So the lawyers donate to Democrats. To prevent any tort reform that would change the easy way lawyers have of getting rich.
It’s the world’s oldest profession. Screwing people for money. But lawyers aren’t the only ones seeking privilege. There are a lot of others, too. Interestingly, they, too, support the Democrat Party. Such as the United Autoworkers. They donate heavily to the Democrat Party to keep labor laws favorable to unions. To make it more difficult for their nonunion competition. And to use the power of government to force people to pay may for a union-made car. Allowing their union members to live better lives than those outside of the UAW. And when even that doesn’t allow General Motors to pay its bills when selling a record number of cars the UAW goes to government for a bailout of their woefully underfunded pension fund. So their union members can continue to have a more generous retirement at an earlier age than those outside of the UAW.
Teacher unions seek privilege, too. You hear a lot about how the teachers don’t earn that much. But then again, they don’t work that much. Getting 3 months off in the summer. So you can’t compare their wages to people who don’t get the 3 summer months off. But for teachers it’s not so much about the paycheck. It’s the benefits. Very generous health insurance coverage. And pensions. Which have gone the way of the dodo in the private sector. Because people are just living too long into retirement. When they first set up these pensions people were dying in their sixties. The actuaries never saw people living into their eighties as common. So in the private sector if you want to spend half of your life retired you have to pay for it. And you work as long as necessary to fund the retirement you want. The union pensions just can’t work these days as they once did. Which is why teacher unions like the United Autoworkers and lawyers support the Democrat Party. They want to keep their privileged lives.
The Wealth Transfers of the Welfare State give Democrats Money and Privilege
Of course privilege is nothing new to the Democrat Party. They have long stood for privilege. Even now. As the Democrats provide themselves all kinds of exceptions from the Affordable Care Act. For more expensive and lower quality health insurance is good for the masses. But not for the privileged elite. Or their special friends who support them so generously with campaign donations. Congress has had a history of exempting themselves from the laws they pass for us. It took the Republican winning of the House in the 1994 midterm elections to change that. The first Republican-controlled House since 1952 required Congress to be held to the same laws as the rest of us. A bitter pill for Democrats to swallow. For their feelings of privilege go way back.
The Democrat Party can trace its pedigree back to Thomas Jefferson’s Democratic-Republican Party. The party of the slave-owning planter elite. Who from day one fought for their privilege starting with the Three-Fifths Compromise. To give them a greater say in the new national government than their voting population allowed. The planter elite’s South turned into an Old World aristocracy. With great manors for the landed aristocracy. And vast lands worked by slaves. Very similar to feudalism in the Old World. And something they fought hard to keep. Their privilege. The Southern Democrats used the power of the national government (such as the Fugitive Slave Act) to interfere with state laws in the North. To protect their feudalism by keeping slavery legal as long as they could while the north was industrializing and modernizing. With paid laborers. When they lost control of the House due to the growing population in the North they turned to war. Saying that the national government was interfering with state laws in the South. And getting poor southern farmers who owned no slaves to fight and die so the southern aristocracy could live on.
When the Southern Democrats lost the American Civil War they scrambled to maintain their privilege. They unleashed a terror on the freed slaves and Republicans with the KKK. The Democrats then wrote Jim Crowe Laws. Separate but equal. Government-enforced racial segregation. During debate of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Democrat and former Exalted Cyclops of the KKK Robert Byrd filibustered for 14 hours. To keep the South segregated. With power and privilege in a new aristocracy. Centered not on land but political power and cronyism. Even becoming the party for blacks as ironic as that is. Trading government programs for votes. And destroying the black family in the process. Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) replaced black fathers with government. And moved single mothers and their children into housing projects that became infested with drugs and crime. But this large (and failed) welfare state transferred a lot of wealth to the Democrats. Giving them money and privilege. That they can use to maintain their power. By taking care of those who take care of them. Lawyers, the UAW, teacher unions and other privilege seekers. For nothing has changed on the left. They have been and always will be an aristocratic-thinking, privilege-seeking people who want to live better than the rest of us. While we pay for their privileged lives.
Tags: aristocracy, aristocratic-thinking, attorney, class action lawsuit, Democrat, Democrat Party, far Left, feudalism, frivolous lawsuits, health insurance, lawsuits, lawyer, money, North, Old World, pension, planter elite, privilege, privilege seekers, privilege seeking, privileged elite, privileged lives, Republican, retirement, slaves, South, Southern Democrats, teacher unions, teachers, tort, tort lawyer, tort reform, UAW, union, unions, United Autoworkers, wealth, welfare state
Slavery made the South more like an Old World Aristocracy than a New World Meritocracy
Democrats don’t like people of color. Never have. The Democrat Party’s lineage goes back to Thomas Jefferson’s Democratic-Republican Party. Thomas Jefferson was one of our Founding Fathers who, as the Democrats love to remind us, owned slaves. In fact, the Democratic-Republican Party was the party of the planter elite. And of slavery. While the opposition party, the Federalists, whose members included George Washington, John Adams and Alexander Hamilton, preferred manufacturing and commerce for the future of the United States. Not just plantations and slavery.
It was these southern planters who made the Three-Fifths Compromise necessary. Slaves couldn’t vote. So the North didn’t want to count them in determining the number of representatives a state had in the House of Representatives. The planter elite did not like this. As the anti-slave North had more free people and would end up controlling the government. Possibly passing anti-slave legislation. Well, without the southern states there would be no United States. So they compromised and counted some of their slaves. Giving the planter elite greater power in the new federal government than their population would otherwise have allowed. And to seal the deal they agreed not to discuss the issue of slavery again for 20 years.
The minority power in the South, the planter elite, who were Democratic-Republicans, brought a lot of slaves to the United States during that 20 year moratorium on the slavery issue. Swelling the slave population in the South. But once the 20 years were up Congress banned the slave trade. So from that point forward all slaves would have to be born on U.S. soil. But the minority power in the South had built their little fiefdoms by then. Owning large estates. With their lands worked by their large slaveholdings. Making the South more like an Old World aristocracy than a New World meritocracy. And the planter elite liked having so much power vested in so few of their hands. From having their few numbers control the federal government. To their absolute control of so many human lives on their plantations. They were an elite few. A superior people. And they liked it.
The South used the Power of the Federal Government to Suppress States’ Rights in the North with the Fugitive Slave Act
Over time as the north pursued the dreams of Washington, Adams and Hamilton immigration began to swell the population in the industrial North. Leading to the South losing their control over the House of Representatives. And threatening their elitism. By then the Democratic-Republican Party had become the Democrat Party. Which pushed to protect the institution of slavery. To protect their southern aristocracy. And their elevated status as a superior people. They used the power of the federal government where they could. Such as passing the Fugitive Slave Act to force free states against their will to return free blacks in their states to slavery. Then they argued that their states’ rights were at risk with all of the North’s abolition talk. Where the North might one day do what the South did to them. Use the federal government to force a state to do something against their will. Such as they did with the Fugitive Slave Act.
Their fight for the Senate led to further compromises to keep the union together while accommodating the planter elite. The Missouri Compromise (1820) had prohibited slavery in the new territory in the Louisiana Territory above approximately the southern border of Missouri (but permitted it within the borders of Missouri). Each state gets two senators. So with the House lost the Democrats needed more of the new states from the Louisiana Territory entered into the Union as slave states. Even those above the southern border of Missouri. Which they did with the Kansas–Nebraska Act. Which repealed the Missouri Compromise and replaced it with popular sovereignty. Where the people would chose whether they wanted to be a slave state or a free state. Setting off a mad rush by both sides to get to these territories so they could vote the slave status of these new states their way. Leading to a bloody civil war in Kansas.
Then another blow fell to the southern aristocracy. Abraham Lincoln. With the election of Republican Abraham Lincoln the southern aristocracy lost not only the House of Representatives but the presidency as well. Worse, the Republicans were an anti-slavery party. So even if they were somehow able to hold onto the Senate the Republicans in power would challenge the planter elite’s supremacy. Break up their fiefdoms. And challenge their power. Something this elite few were willing to fight to prevent. Well, they were willing to have others fight for them. To maintain the social order in the South. Leading to cries about states’ rights. And an over-powerful federal government. Despite their having used the power of the federal government to suppress states’ rights in the North with the Fugitive Slave Act.
Democrats see Benefits for Blacks as a Necessary Evil to keep them in Power
Most southerners were poor farmers. Who owned no slaves. Yet they rose to fight for states’ rights. And to protect the South from northern aggression. At least, that was what the planter elite had them believe. Who sent many of these poor farmers to their deaths in the American Civil War. When it was over approximately 8.6% of the South’s population was dead. By comparison World War II killed approximately 405,399 Americans. However, if we had suffered the same death rate as the South did in the American Civil War our World War II dead would have totaled over 12 million. This is what the southern aristocracy was willing to—and did—sacrifice to maintain their power and privilege. Their supremacy over other people. Especially over their black slaves.
Such a feeling of superiority allows you to do some pretty horrible things. Just review the history of Nazi Germany to see some of the atrocities a ‘master race’ can do. In the post-war South the Democrats did not lose with grace. They resented the martial law in the South after the war. And they hated Republican rule. Protecting their former slaves. Even allowing them to run for government office. It was all too much for the fallen southern aristocracy. To remind people of the proper order of southern society they formed the KKK. And unleashed a terror across the South. Killing their former slaves. And Republicans. To codify their white supremacy the Democrats turned to the legislature. And passed laws to segregate the ‘inferior blacks’ from their superior selves. Jim Crowe Laws. Separate but equal. With the emphasis on ‘separate’. In time pressure grew against the southern Democrats. But they held strong in Congress. Fighting against any civil rights legislation. Including the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Where Democrat Senator Robert Byrd (and former Exalted Cyclops of the KKK) filibustered against the Civil Rights Act for 14 hours and 13 minutes. To keep the blacks segregated from their superior selves.
Things are a lot better these days. But Democrat feelings of superiority die hard. Even though they would have us believe they like blacks today. Despite their past hatred of blacks. And their seething anger of having lost them from their plantations. But they found a way to ‘get them back on the plantation’. By making them dependent on government. In exchange for their vote. Which keeps them in power. Back where they believe they belong. And are entitled to be. Because they are a superior people. So benefits for blacks are a necessary evil to Democrats. For they still don’t like them. As evidenced by where they live. Where some of the richest Democrats (such as Nancy Pelosi) live in the whitest of neighborhoods. And their apparent racial purification of society. Through the guise of women’s rights. The most important thing to women, according to Democrats, is abortion. And they do their best to make abortion readily available. Especially to women of color. Like in New York City. And Mississippi. Where black women are having far more abortions than white women. Making America whiter. More like the neighborhood where Nancy Pelosi lives. And more like the color Democrats have fought to keep America since the Three-Fifths Compromise. The Fugitive Slave Act. Popular Sovereignty. The KKK. And Jim Crowe Laws.
Tags: abolition, abortion, Abraham Lincoln, American Civil War, aristocracy, blacks, civil rights, Democrat Party, Democratic-Republican Party, Democrats, elite, elite few, federal government, fiefdoms, Fugitive Slave Act, House of Representatives, Jim Crowe laws, Kansas, Kansas-Nebraska Act, KKK, Louisiana Territory, Missouri, Missouri Compromise, Nancy Pelosi, New World, North, Old World, plantation, planter elite, popular sovereignty, power, privilege, Republican, Senate, slavery, slaves, South, southern aristocracy, Southern Democrats, states' rights, superior, superiority, supremacy, Three-Fifths Compromise, white supremacy
Colorado has allowed Recreational Use of Marijuana even though Federal Law prohibits its Sale and Use
Everyone on the left is saying it. Those in the mainstream media are saying it. Even some on the right are saying it. Obamacare is the law of the land. And it isn’t going away. As no law ever goes away. So get used to it. And quit your bitching, conservatives. Especially you radical Tea Party extremists. With all of your Constitutional this and Constitutional that. If you’re all about the rule of law then follow the rule of law. And quit trying to repeal Obamacare.
Marijuana is a class one narcotic. Federal law prohibits its sales and use. Yet those on the left have tried long and hard to decriminalize it. Comparing it to alcohol. Which is not a class one narcotic. For the left does not like the law criminalizing the sale and use of marijuana. And have bitched so much about it that at first states have allowed medical marijuana. And now Colorado has allowed recreational use of marijuana. Washington, too. Even though federal law prohibits the sale and use of this class one narcotic.
There are millions of illegal aliens in the United States. Who are in the country illegally. But those on the left want to change our laws so they aren’t here illegally. They want to grant them amnesty. Forgive their law-breaking. And give them citizenship. Because they are sure that if they do they will then thank those on the left (i.e., the Democrat Party) by voting Democrat. Especially when they’re telling them that the only reason why they are illegal is that Republicans hate Hispanics.
The Supreme Court made Law the People or Congress would not by Decriminalizing Abortion
The Second Amendment to the Constitution grants the people the right to keep and bear arms. The left doesn’t like guns. And they especially don’t like people owning guns. So the left hates the Second Amendment. Have long campaigned to curb gun ownership. And have used every opportunity to advance new gun control legislation. Whenever a mentally troubled individual goes on a shooting spree they blame the gun and not the mentally troubled individual. Adam Lanza, James Holmes, Jared Loughner and Seung-Hui Cho were all mentally troubled people. Yet the discussion is always about taking guns away from law-abiding gun owners. Not identifying these mentally troubled people before they hurt someone. Which they could still do even if you take other people’s guns away.
Abortion was illegal everywhere in the United States. The left did not like this. So they campaigned long and hard to decriminalize abortion. Which they could not do. At least, in Congress. Because the majority of the people opposed decriminalizing abortion. And they never had the votes in Congress to pass a law allowing abortion. Which is why there has never been an abortion debate in Congress. Not liking their odds in Congress they turned to the courts. On January 22, 1973, the Supreme Court made law the people or Congress would not. And decriminalized abortion.
The progressives in the early 20th century saw the people were just not smart enough to know what was best for them. And drinking was not. Husbands drank away their paychecks, came home drunk and beat their wives and gave them (and their unborn children) the syphilis they caught from prostitutes hanging out in saloons. So the progressives got a new amendment added to the Constitution to prohibit the sale and transportation of alcohol. The Eighteenth Amendment. A law the people didn’t like. And they repealed the Eighteenth Amendment with the Twenty-first Amendment. The only Constitutional amendment to be repealed.
The Left tries to Change or Go Around via the Courts Laws they Don’t Like
During the 1950s and 1960s Jim Crowe laws kept America segregated. Separate but equal went the mantra. The Southern Democrats made it difficult for blacks to vote. And treated them as second class citizens. Giving us race riots in the Sixties. And a civil rights movement. From the Montgomery Bus Boycott to Martin Luther King’s I have a Dream speech in Washington the movement grew in intensity. Leading to the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Overturning the Jim Crowe laws and desegregating America. Thanks to a united Republican Party that was able to overcome Democrat opposition in Congress to pass the bill.
The Southern Democrats did not lose the American Civil War well. They did not like the Fifteenth Amendment allowing their former slaves to vote. And they did not like the Thirteenth Amendment freeing their slaves. So the planter elite and their fellow Southern Democrats created the KKK. And began passing Jim Crowe laws to keep the defeated South racially segregated. The way it was written into the U.S. Constitution. The way it had to be written into the Constitution to get the Deep South to join the new United States of America. As the planter elite made clear. If there was no slavery there would be no United States.
We’ve had a lot of bad law in this country. Laws that we’ve repealed. Sometimes even over Democrat opposition. In fact the Southern Democrats pulled the southern states out of the union and into civil war with the northern states to defend the planter elite’s right to own slaves. Just as the planter elite forced those who wrote the Constitution to leave slavery alone if they expected their states to join the new union. And we’ve had laws the left just doesn’t like. Laws they’ve worked long and hard to change. Such as criminalizing gun ownership and decriminalizing marijuana. Or to get around them via the courts. Such as abortion. So the argument to just accept Obamacare because it’s the law of the land is a pretty weak argument. And chastising Republicans for not accepting laws they don’t like is hypocritical to say the least. We should be able to get rid of bad law. And Obamacare is a bad law. As it is doing the opposite of what it was supposed to do. So why not repeal it? I mean, if we were able to get rid of Jim Crowe Laws we should be able to get rid of another bad law like Obamacare.
Tags: abortion, civil rights, class one narcotic, Colorado, Congress, Constitutional, Democrat, Eighteenth Amendment, gun control, gun ownership, illegal aliens, Jim Crowe, Jim Crowe laws, law of the land, marijuana, Obamacare, planter elite, Progressives, repeal Obamacare, Republican, Second Amendment, slavery, Southern Democrats, Supreme Court
The Southern Democrats fought to Maintain Slavery, Formed the KKK and Implemented Jim Crowe Laws
Children love candy. And sweet treats. They will gorge themselves on them. And ruin their dinner. Or sicken themselves so much from these sweet treats that they will vomit. If parents let them. But parents don’t. Sometimes making for some unhappy children. But parents don’t do this because they are mean. They do this because it’s best for the children.
Politicians are a lot like parents. Bad parents. Because their ‘children’ can vote. And because they can they will feed them all the sweet treats they so desired. No matter how bad they are for them. No matter how bad they are for the country. Why? Parents will do what’s best for their children. While politicians do what’s best for them.
The Southern Democrats fought to maintain slavery. They formed the KKK following the Civil War and the emancipation of their slaves. They then implemented Jim Crowe laws to segregate the South. That were in effect until 1965. Then the Southern Democrats opposed the Civil Rights Act (1964). One of the longest serving and most revered Southern Democrats, Robert Byrd, was an Exalted Cyclops in the KKK. And he filibustered the Civil Rights Act. Yet at his death the Democrats eulogized him with great awe and reverence. Despite all of this Democrats say Republicans are the racists. And blacks overwhelmingly vote Democrat. Why?
The Democrats destroyed the Black Family with AFDC and Public Housing
Abraham Lincoln was a Republican. The Republicans won the Civil War. They maintained martial law in the South following the war to protect the emancipated slaves. They did not form the KKK. Nor did any of them serve as the Exalted Cyclops. They opposed Jim Crowe laws. And fought for the Civil Rights Act. So why is it that the general perception is that Republicans are racists while those with a racist past, Democrats, are not? Because the Democrats are real good at lying and manipulating people. That’s why. And they’re bad parents.
One of the greatest political feats in the history of the United States was the turning of blacks against their emancipators and defenders. And changing their allegiance to the people who once enslaved and oppressed them. And how did they do this? With the Great Society. Full of tasty treats. Especially for blacks in the poor inner cities. The candy? Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC). And public housing. Which just destroyed the black family. As the nanny state replaced the black father. And gathered these single mothers and their fatherless children in crime ridden public housing of the inner cities.
Without a strong male role model in a child’s life they tend to get in trouble. Because a single mother cannot discipline children as much as two parents can. So a fatherless child strays. They run with others who pull them further into trouble. And when the state gathered large groups of fatherless children in public housing they ran in gangs. Creating the crime that made public housing crime ridden. And because all these kids went to the same schools they took their trouble into the schools. Leading to lower graduation rates. Fewer college enrollments. Higher unemployment. And lower median incomes. This is what the Democrats gave blacks with their nanny state. And they got them dependent on the nanny state. So they continued to vote Democrat. Even though voting Democrat was the worst thing blacks could have done. Based on what Democrats have done to the black family.
If You raise the Price of the McDonald’s Burger there is no Cost Savings by eating the McDonald’s Burger
Today minimum wage workers across the country were demanding that the government raise the minimum wage to about twice what it is. To $15/hour. For these entry level jobs. The Democrats support this. For it’s more candy for their children. Even though it’s not good for them. For these are not careers. Nor should they be. These are entry-level jobs for people with no skills. So they can gain some rudimentary skills to help them with their next step up their career ladder. People don’t go to medical school and then work at McDonald’s. No, they go to medical school explicitly so they don’t have to work a minimum wage job. And those who don’t have to work a minimum wage job all of their life have a better life. Both monetarily. And personally. With the satisfaction of doing something that gives their life greater meaning.
Of course if they raise the minimum wage to $15/hour minimum wage workers will lose their jobs. For if you raise the labor rate prices will rise. And sales will fall. And with fewer sales businesses will lay off some of their minimum wage workers. And the Democrats know this. They’ve worked hard to get tariff protection to protect their union brethren in the automotive industry. Because those higher wages raised the price of cars. And reduced sales. Hence the tariff protect6ion. To force people to pay more for their cars. By forcing the price of the competition higher. So they can continue to sell cars built with their more costly union labor. So Democrats know higher labor costs raise prices and reduce sales. So why do they want a higher minimum wage?
People buy fast food because of the value. They get a decent bang for the buck. But if you reduce that bang people will buy less. For if McDonald’s costs as much as a delicious burger at, say, Red Robin, which burger do you think the people will buy? They’re going to buy the Red Robin burger. For if you raise the price of the McDonald’s burger there is no cost savings by eating the McDonald’s burger. So they won’t. The Democrats know this, too. But they also know by giving their children this candy they can get their vote. It will make their children’s lives worse in the long run but that’s okay. As long as they can get their vote now. For that’s all that is important. Not the lives they destroy by being bad parents.
Tags: AFDC, bad parents, black family, black father, Civil Rights Act, Civil War, Democrats, emancipation, fatherless children, Jim Crowe laws, KKK, McDonald's, minimum wage, minimum wage job, nanny state, politicians, public housing, racists, Republicans, single-mother, slavery, Southern Democrats, tariff
Stores used the Incentives of Black Friday to get People to do what they Wanted
A belated happy Thanksgiving. And a belated happy Black Friday. We say belated because Black Friday was already here by the time Friday woke from its sleepy slumber. No more waiting in line Friday morning for those stores to open. No. Today if you snooze (i.e., spend Thanksgiving with the family at home) you lose. Because it’s first come first served. Which means if you wanted to get some of those deep discounts before they run out you didn’t let anything silly like celebrating Thanksgiving with the family get in your way.
Now everyone loves a bargain. It’s why we scan the Sunday sales papers. And search online for the best price. But in the Obama ‘recovery’ there isn’t a whole lot of spending going on. As there isn’t a whole lot of employment going on. Since President Obama assumed office his policies have destroyed some 10 million jobs. And one thing about unemployed people. They definitely want a bargain. Especially if they want a good Christmas for their family during the dark times of the Obama presidency.
But there is a greater lesson Black Friday can tell us other than President Obama is a bad president. Especially in things economic. Why are stores opening on Thanksgiving? Because they’re cruel and evil forcing their workers to slave away during a holiday? No. It’s not that. In fact, some employees love working on a holiday. For they get paid more working on a holiday than they normally would. Allowing them to earn extra money to give their families a good Christmas during the dark times of the Obama presidency. As it turns out shoppers and workers alike like Black Friday. For it allows each to have more for less. And that is the great lesson of Black Friday. Getting people to do what you want by offering them something they want. Or, in other words, offering them an incentive.
The Kansas–Nebraska Act of 1854 pitted Northern Republicans against Slave-Owning Southern Democrats
Slaves working in the planter South had no desire to be slaves. Yet they were slaves. Why? There weren’t slaves in the North. Only in the South. The blacks in the north chose not to be slaves. While those in the South had no choice. The planter elite in the South, the ‘Old World’ planter aristocracy, used force. And having a larger force in Washington than they normally would have (thanks to the Three-Fifths Compromise that counted slaves as three-fifths of a person for representation in Congress) they were able to use the force of government to continue to force blacks into slavery. The Southern Democrats (i.e., the ‘Old World’ planter aristocracy) were able to keep the black man enslaved until the mid 19th century. Even using the power of the federal government to override states’ rights in the North. Using the Fugitive Slave Act to force northern states to return fugitive slaves to their Southern Democrat owners. The ‘Old World’ planter aristocracy.
This is coercion. This is how you get people to do what they don’t want to do. Using the power of the federal government the Southern Democrats kept their slaves in bondage. Also, using the power of the federal government they forced those in the North who wanted to help ‘fugitive’ slaves to stay free return their slaves or else. That ‘or else’ being the full weight of the federal government coming down on them with extreme prejudice. But when the North became more populated control of the House of Representatives favored the larger populated North. Despite the Three-Fifths Compromise. Which left the Senate. And as each state got two senators how the new states entered the union mattered. For the planter elite to hold their power over the United States.
The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was an early attempt to put slavery onto the path of oblivion. Those in the North did not want it. The planter elite in the South did. So they compromised. Slavery could remain in the South to appease the planter elite but the compromise prohibited slavery in the new Louisiana Territory that Thomas Jefferson purchased above the 36°30′ parallel (about the southern border of Missouri). Except in the state of Missouri. Then came the Kansas–Nebraska Act of 1854 and the idea of popular sovereignty. Throwing the Missouri Compromise of 1820 out the window. These two states were both above the 36°30′ parallel. The Kansas–Nebraska Act of 1854 said the first people into the fledging states could choose for themselves if they would be a slave-state or a free-state. Which led to a mad rush to Kansas. And a bloody civil war there. That eventually led to the American Civil War. To settle once and for all the issue of slavery in America. Would the Southern Democrats prevail and keep the black man in bondage? Or would the Republicans free the slaves?
Obamacare is less like Black Friday and more like Slavery
Even if you flunked your history class you should know the answer to this. Abraham Lincoln and his Republicans defeated the Southern Democrats and won the American Civil War. Freeing the slaves. Of course, the Southern Democrats were not good losers. They gave us the KKK. Then the Jim Crowe Laws. The separate but equal nonsense that didn’t exist in the Republican North. The old southern aristocracy were not huge fans of the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution. All they wanted was privilege. They wanted the Old World in the New World. And the planter elite fought bitterly to keep that. Well, not them as much as their fellow southerners they lied to about states’ rights. Getting them (most of who were too poor to own a single slave) to fight and sacrifice their lives to maintain the institution of slavery. To maintain the privilege of the southern aristocracy.
So there you have examples of incentive and coercion. Black Friday incentivized people to hire in for seasonal jobs during the holiday season. And brought people into stores with deep discounting. Everyone got something they wanted. And so they did what the store owners wanted. People worked for them on Thanksgiving. And people came into the stores on Thanksgiving. Both of their own free will. Now contrast that to slavery. Where there was no free will. Only the coercion of the federal government. Where fear and intimidation compelled slaves to remain slaves. And their only incentive was to obey their masters to avoid physical harm.
With the Supreme Court ruling the penalty of Obamacare became a tax. Allowing the federal government to compel people to buy health insurance or suffer the consequences. A ‘tax’ that will grow in time. Buy insurance or else. With that ‘or else’ being the full force and fury of the IRS. Something most people would find more unpleasant than a colonoscopy. Without any anesthetic. No, a letter from the IRS is something no one wants to see in their mail. For few things will fill you with fear and dread more. This is the enforcement mechanism of Obamacare. Which they need because people otherwise wouldn’t spend more for less. Higher insurance premiums to cover things they will never need (a gay man will never need prenatal care). And sky-high deductibles that will be like having no insurance. As everything will be out of pocket until you reach that sky-high deductible. Which few people will reach unless they have a catastrophic illness or accident. This is why people are NOT signing up for Obamacare. Because Obamacare ain’t no Black Friday. Obamacare is offering nothing the people want. At prices higher than they ever had to pay for health insurance before. Leaving them with less to spend on their family. Forcing them to cut out things they once enjoyed. Which is why Obamacare will fail. Because you can’t incentivize people to make their lives worse. No, to do that you need the fearful power of the state. Just like the Southern Democrats used to maintain the institution of slavery.
Tags: American Civil War, aristocracy, bargain, Black Friday, Christmas, Civil War, coercion, dark times of the Obama presidency, deductible, federal government, free will, fugitive slaves, incentive, incentivize, insurance, IRS, Kansas-Nebraska Act, Missouri Compromise, North, Obama, Obamacare, Old World, planter, planter aristocracy, planter elite, Republicans, slavery, slaves, South, Southern Democrats, states' rights, Thanksgiving, Three-Fifths Compromise
The Way to Great Wealth in the South was King Cotton
At the recent 50th anniversary of Dr. Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream” speech most if not all of the speakers were liberal Democrats. As if the Republicans were not welcomed there. Funny. As it was the Republicans who battled the Democrats to end slavery, Jim Crowe Laws and discrimination.
America’s original sin, slavery, was a part of the Old World southern planters did not want to give up. It was very similar to the manorial system of Europe. Where peasants were tied to the land. On a manor. Unable to leave. Land that a rich landowner owned. The lord of the manor. Property and status were hereditary. And the peasants at the bottom of the ladder had neither.
The lords belonged to the aristocracy. The nobility. They lived in glorious mansions. Gave magnificent parties. And enjoyed the best of everything. Courtesy of owning land. The peasants worked the land. And produced the greatest wealth in the kingdom for their lord. Food. In the American South this soon became cotton. King Cotton. The way to great wealth in the South was growing cotton. And the more slaves you had the more noble your life was.
The Founding Fathers wanted to Eradicate Slavery at the Time of the Founding
Things were different in the North. Years of growing tobacco had depleted the land. So they diversified. Grew different crops. And rotated the crops around. This required a more specialized workforce as things changed from year to year. And few farms grew one large cash crop anymore. So they turned to paid-labor. Which was more efficient. So while the South held on to the Old World the North became more egalitarian.
The Founding Fathers knew that a nation based on all men being equal could not include the institution of slavery. They wanted to eradicate it at the time of the drafting of the Constitution. But that created a problem with the South. At the time of the Founding their economy was dependent on slavery. And because it was they had more slaves than the North. So freeing the slaves would not only destroy their economy it would force the South to live in a biracial society that was unheard of at that time. Nowhere in the world were there biracial societies. Not to mention the fact that the freed blacks would outnumber the whites. The very same whites that once brutally oppressed the blacks.
To form a more perfect union they needed the southern states. Which they had to take as-is. With the institution of slavery. It was a bitter pill to swallow. As some of these Founding Fathers, especially the ones that didn’t own slaves, were conscious of the history books that would one day be written. As well as being truly opposed to slavery. But the choice was a new nation with slavery. Or no new nation. And continued sectional disputes. Even hostilities. Making them ripe for European intrigue. Especially from the Old World Empires who wanted to expand their empires into North America.
The Republicans Freed the Slaves, Fought against Jim Crowe Laws and Desegregated the South
So the Founding Fathers tabled the subject of slavery for 20 years. Sure that in 20 years time the South would adopt paid labor as they did in the North. Sadly, a great invention changed all that. The cotton gin. Which could process cotton faster than slaves could pick it. King Cotton promised more wealth than ever before. All you needed was a lot of slaves. Dashing the hopes of the Founding Fathers.
Wealth. Nobility. Life was good for the privileged few in the South. The planter elite. The southern Democrats. Who used the power of the federal government to return fugitive slaves. Then bitched about the federal government after they lost control of it. The planter elite brought the nation to civil war. To preserve the institution of slavery. To keep the Old World in the South. To keep the nobility in the South. With them sitting at the top of the aristocracy. But then came the Republicans. And Abraham Lincoln. Who issued the Emancipation Proclamation. Freeing the slaves in the states in open rebellion. Then Ulysses S. Grant won the American Civil War. The Republicans pushed for and ratified the Thirteenth Amendment. Abolishing slavery and involuntary servitude. Then Republican President Grant sent federal troops into the South to protect the freed blacks. As the racist southern Democrats resisted integrating the freed blacks into the South. Eventually passing Jim Crowe Laws. Making the freed blacks a permanent underclass with the Democrats’ separate but equal status of the freed blacks.
Democrat Storm Thurmond has the record for the longest filibuster in U.S. history. He talked for 24 hours and 18 minutes in his opposition of the Civil Rights Act of 1957. For he wanted to keep blacks separate but equal. The southern Democrats opposition to civil rights was so strong that it prevailed through JFK’s administration. Who did nothing for civil rights lest he go against the powerful southern Democrats. Despite all the Republicans did the Democrats kept the black man down in the South. Dr. King fought against segregation in Albany, Georgia, in 1962. And suffered brutal police oppression in Birmingham, Alabama, that same year. Things were so bad during JFK’s administration that Dr. King helped organized the 1963 March on Washington. Where he gave his famous “I Have a Dream” speech. But real change would have to wait until Republican Richard Nixon became president. Who implemented the first large-scale desegregation of public schools in the Democrat-controlled South. And Nixon implemented the first affirmative action plan. The Philadelphia plan.
Yet despite all of this the Democrats claim the title of champion of civil rights. And dominated the 50th anniversary of Dr. Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream” speech. Even though it was the Republicans who freed the slaves, fought against Jim Crowe Laws and desegregated the South. While the Democrats fought them every step of the way. Yet the Democrats are civil rights champions. While Republicans are racists. What’s wrong with this picture?
Tags: aristocracy, civil rights, cotton, Democrats, discrimination, Dr. King, Dr. Martin Luther King, Founding Fathers, Grant, I Have a Dream, JFK, Jim Crowe laws, King Cotton, Martin Luther King's, Nixon, nobility, Old World, paid-labor, planter elite, Republicans, separate but equal, slavery, South, Southern Democrats
The Left needs Racism to Exist so they can Continue the Fight to End Racism
George Zimmerman had what pretty much everyone said was a fair trial. And extensive attempts to detect a racial motivation have been in vain. Most people seem to agree that race was not a factor in the shooting of Trayvon Martin. Yet since the ‘not guilty’ verdict some have been saying things like if Trayvon Martin was a white kid Zimmerman would not have followed him. And that if Martin was a white kid and a black man shot him a jury would have found that black man guilty of first degree murder.
These things are so obvious that some people (primarily those on the political left) are demanding the federal government charge Zimmerman with a race-based hate crime. And for violating Martin’s civil rights. Despite pretty much everyone having said it was a fair trial. And extensive attempts to detect a racial motivation have been in vain. But it’s now about race. Why? And where is their concern for what’s happening in Chicago? Where the black on black murder rate is soaring?
Government fixes problems. And Big Government fixes big problems. Problems like racism. By creating agencies and writing legislation to end racism. Increasing the size of the government. And increasing their power. Putting more and more people into powerful positions. Earning large salaries. While activists agitate. Getting more time in the news whenever they speak out against racism. Staying relevant. And allowing them to collect vast sums of money to continue the fight to end racism. Which brings us to why the political left is giving the Zimmerman case a racial component when none exists. For they need racism to exist. So they can continue the fight to end racism. Because it gives them power. And pays them so well.
The Left has transformed Rugged Individualism into Complacency, Lethargy and Subservience
The political left wants to expand the size of government. They want the government to do more for the people. Like the social democracies in Europe. And they want the people to be dependent on the government. With the government redistributing ever more wealth. And they want to be the people deciding who gets this redistributed wealth. Because of the power it gives them. And the wealth. For the more wealth that passes through the government the more they can skim off the top. So they can make ‘investments’ in selected businesses. Businesses, coincidentally, that their friends own. Who return the favor with campaign donations. From the very tax money they ‘invested’ in those businesses.
But their crony capitalist friends in business are not the only recipients of government largesse. The government gives alms to the people. To make them dependent on government. Form Social Security to Medicare to Obamacare to food stamps. Not a lot to make their lives really comfortable. But enough that they can survive without working. Getting them complacent. Lethargic. And subservient. A permanent underclass. Afraid to lose their government benefits. So they keep voting the political left into office. To keep their benefits. Keeping them complacent. Lethargic. And subservient. A long way from the rugged individualism of our grandfathers.
But it’s just not the crony capitalism. And the alms. There are also the agencies and the legislation. And the vast government bureaucracy. That becomes so entrenched that it becomes impossible to get rid of it. Which is why government only grows. It never shrinks. Because government bureaucracies take on a life of their own. And like any living organism they grow. And the more agencies and legislation for that permanent underclass the greater that vast government bureaucracy is. The more positions of power. And the more money that passes through government.
The Left is making the Zimmerman Verdict about Race because it gives them Purpose, Power and Wealth
During the mid 1800s the majority of southerners lived and worked on family-owned farms. Were poor. And did not own slaves. For slaves were expensive. The great slave populations were on the plantations. Owned by the rich planter class. Who ran the government. A true Old World aristocracy if there ever was one. You’ve seen Gone with the Wind. Glorious mansions. Huge landholdings. Servants. And family names so great they were nearly royalty. People treated them like royalty. And they expected the people to treat them as royalty. For they were. In the plantation South. And this was what they were fighting to preserve. That part of the Old World that the United States broke free from. Where some people were better than you based on their birth. And it mattered what your last name was.
So they plunged their people into war. Telling them it was about states’ rights. And northern aggression. When it was nothing more than these few people, the planter elite, the southern Democrats, trying to keep the South in the 18th century. With them enjoying their positions of privilege. While the masses toiled for them. In fact they were so exalted that they actually owned human beings. Like barons. And earls. And dukes. They liked that world. Just as landowning aristocracies have for millennium. Then the Founding Fathers had to come along and muck everything up. With their “all men are created equal.” And their Constitution. Creating a government of the people. Instead of what it should be. A government of the privileged elite. Then that abominable Abraham Lincoln. And his “government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.” How they hated that. And ever since losing the Civil War the southern Democrats struggled to maintain their position of privilege.
The descendants of those southern Democrats, liberals, still seek privilege and power. And few have suffered as much to advance their cause than blacks. They destroyed the black family with Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC). Where the government replaced the father in the black families on AFDC. Saying these women didn’t need to get married. Or live with the fathers of their children. So black children grew up without fathers. Or male role models. Which spurred the creation of Big Brothers. To provide positive role models for these black kids harmed by liberal policies. So they wouldn’t turn to the streets. Or gangs. Which they did. And still do. In alarming numbers. And today little has changed in the black community. The vast majority of black children are born to single mothers. And the streets of Chicago run red with the blood of black teens and young adults. But the political left doesn’t care about these blacks. Because their deaths can’t help them politically. Especially when it’s their policies that caused all of this violence. But when a light-skin Hispanic (who those on the left called a ‘white’ Hispanic) kills a black teen, why, that’s close enough to a white man killing a black teen. And THAT can help them politically. Which is why the left is making this a case about race. Because it gives the left purpose. And purpose leads to power and wealth.
Tags: AFDC, alms, aristocracy, black family, Chicago, complacent, Democrats, dependent on government, fair trial, George Zimmerman, government benefits, government bureaucracy, lethargic, liberals, Martin, Old World, permanent underclass, plantation, planter class, political left, power, privilege, race, racial motivation, racism, redistributed wealth, royalty, rugged individualism, slaves, Southern Democrats, subservient, the fight to end racism, Trayvon Martin, trial, vast government bureaucracy, wealth, Zimmerman
The Planter Elite was a Small Minority in the South but these Southern Democrats Wielded the Political Power
People often say that the Democrat Party is for the working man. Which is rather ironic as it has more often been the party of privilege. It was also the party of slavery. The party of Jim Crowe Laws. The party of segregation. And the party to have an Exalted Cyclops of the KKK as a high-ranking member of Congress. Senator Byrd. Who later filibustered against the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Which is another irony.
Black voters tend to vote Democrat despite this history. At the time of the Civil War it was Northern Republicans against Southern Democrats. The Southern states seceding from the Union to keep their slaves. And the institution of slavery. For the plantation system was a throwback to Old World aristocracy. Only with slaves instead of peasants. The Planter Elite was a small minority in the South. But they wielded the political power. And owned all of the good land. Like in any landed aristocracy. And slavery worked that good land. That peculiar institution that survived long past the 20 years the Founding Fathers thought it would. Of course, the Founding Fathers never counted on Eli Whitney. Or his cotton gin.
Today’s Democrats can trace their lineage back to Thomas Jefferson’s Republican Party. And to the man who wrote “all men are created equal.” The hero of the yeoman farmer. The backbone of the new republic. Only Thomas Jefferson was more equal than most. He was part of the landed aristocracy of the South, the planter elite. Wealthy. Refined. A bit of a dandy. And a hypocrite. To some.
Thomas Jefferson saw the Corruption Resulting from Mixing Money and Government
Thomas Jefferson was brilliant. Well read. And had strong beliefs. He understood politics. And he knew world history. He hated bankers and merchants. Saw the corruption resulting from mixing money and government. And especially hated Alexander Hamilton. The secretary of the treasury. And puppet master of George Washington. Or so he believed.
Hamilton was a capitalist. He understood money. And the power of capital. Ergo he was a sneaky bastard. Corrupt. And possibly the devil. In Jefferson’s eyes. So he worked tirelessly to destroy Hamilton. Put a man on the federal payroll to help fund an opposition newspaper. And slandered the hell out of him. Exposed the affair with Mrs. Reynolds but left out the part about the Reynolds being crooks. Mrs. Reynolds seduced Hamilton so Mr. Reynolds could blackmail him. She did. He did. And Hamilton paid. With his own money. But Jefferson accused him of embezzling from the treasury to pay off the Reynolds. And later lamented that Hamilton was such a good thief that they found absolutely no evidence of his heinous crimes.
When Jefferson was president, though, he did something very Hamiltonian. He bought the Louisiana Territory. Something that Hamilton would have done in a heartbeat. And something Jefferson would have fought tirelessly against if he tried.
The Democrat Party is the Party of the Working Man as long as that Working Man belongs to a Union
So was Jefferson a hypocrite? Sort of. To many he was. To himself, though, he wasn’t. In his mind there was no contradiction in any of his actions. For Jefferson’s mind could believe two conflicting truths at the same time. He didn’t lie. He didn’t flip flop. These were not contradictions. But paradoxes. For the truth was nimble and flexible in his pragmatic vision. And in that vision was an agrarian economy. No banks. A weak merchant class. And a very limited and anemic federal government. That spoke with a southern accent. In other words a federal government was okay per se as long as Virginia and the planters of the other southern states controlled it. Which they did for nearly a century thanks to the Three-Fifths Compromise. That counted slaves as three-fifths a person for representation (giving the South more representatives per district than the North). But not for taxation.
Privilege. Born of the plantation system in America. Based on the institution of slavery. Where a small minority wielded great political power. And exploited people (slaves) to accumulate wealth. Protect their power. And their privilege. Not unlike the modern Democrat Party. But today, because of the abolition of slavery, they have to do things differently.
Yes, the Democrat Party is the party of the working man. As long as that working man belongs to a union. Pays union dues. And that union supports the Democrat party. Working men who don’t are scabs. And don’t deserve to have jobs. So Democrat legislation favors Big Labor. And unions. Makes it hard for nonunion companies to compete for work. And jobs using federal money have to pay union wages. Either by union employees. Preferably. Or scabs earning union scale thanks to Davis-Bacon. Which they would rather not have. Because scabs earning union scale thanks to Davis-Bacon still don’t pay union dues. But it at least makes it harder to compete against union companies.
Privilege Begets Privilege
This is the formula for most Democrat support. Automotive workers (UAW). Health care workers (SIEU). Public sector workers (public sector unions). Public school teachers (teachers unions). And so on. Privilege begets privilege. You get favorable legislation as long as part of your union dues goes to Democrat coffers. And if Democrats win control of Congress they will implement more anti-capitalistic legislation. Impose tariffs to protect union jobs. Increasing costs to taxpayers everywhere. To support this privilege class. So it’s who you know. And not your ability. Just like it was in the good old days.
To bolster their power they have to appeal to others in the electorate who aren’t union employees. Because there just aren’t enough union employees. Yet, at least. So they also delve into crony capitalism. Picking winners and losers in the private sector. By supporting companies in favorable industries with grants and loan guarantees. The winners being those who support Democrat candidates. Privilege begets privilege. The losers being those who don’t. And these poor bastards not only don’t get grants or loan guarantees. But the government saddles them with costly regulations to boot. Or the Justice Departments initiates antitrust proceedings against them. Like Microsoft.
Of course it takes Big Government to play like this. And Big Government needs a lot of taxes. For to spend money you have to first tax. Or play with monetary policy. Which is why Democrats will always oppose returning to the gold standard. Because sometimes you can’t tax and spend. Sometimes you have to print money and spend. And you can’t do that with a gold standard. But because of the problems inherent with printing money (inflation), they will tax every last penny they can first. And their weapon of choice is class warfare. To get the poor and middle class to agree to increase tax rates on the rich. Which they are all for. But what they don’t know is that Democrats are constantly redefining who is rich. Which they would not be for. Because a lot of people are being surprised to find out that they are now rich. Especially modest middle class couples (say a cop and a teacher) whose combined income make them rich. Much to their surprise.
The Democrat Party is For Sale to the Highest Contributor
The Democrats round out their base by appealing to populist issues. They play down the God stuff and keep abortion legal to keep the youth vote. And the feminists. By showing that the government is not your parents when it comes to sex. Or drugs (the youth is ever hopeful for the Democrat who finally decriminalizes marijuana). Which is ironic as that same government acts like parents everywhere else. Policing what we eat, drink and legally smoke.
They increase welfare spending to keep the poor dependent. And voting Democrat. They appeal to special interests (environmentalists, gays and lesbians, etc.) to get their support, too. By painting their opponents as vicious monsters who want to destroy the environment. Who want to criminalize being gay. And who want to bring back the Spanish Inquisition.
You see, the modern Democrat Party has to buy votes. Or lie to scare people. Because people don’t willingly vote to give privilege to others. Unless there’s something in it for them. And this is where the modern Democrat Party breaks from Thomas Jefferson. Jefferson did things to prevent money from influencing power. And he did some pretty shady things. But they were for a higher purpose. To keep the spirit of 1776 alive.
The higher purpose of the Democratic Party? The Democratic Party. And unlike Jefferson, they’re all for influencing power with money. In fact, the Democrat Party is for sale to the highest contributor.
Tags: Alexander Hamilton, aristocracy, bankers, Big Government, capital, capitalist, class warfare, Davis-Bacon, Democrat, Democratic Party, federal government, Founding Fathers, gold standard, Hamilton, Jefferson, landed aristocracy, liberal, merchants, middle class, monetary policy, money, Old World, plantation system, planter elite, politics, privilege, privilege begets privilege, Republican, rich, scabs, slavery, slaves, South, Southern Democrats, Southern states, tax, Tax and spend, taxes, Thomas Jefferson, three-fifths, union, union dues, union wages, working man, youth
The New World leaves old Prejudices in the Old World
Americans hated Catholics. And why not? Most Americans were British. In the 18th century. When Protestant Great Britain was forever at war with Catholic France. Since the Reformation, it’s what Protestants and Catholics did. Hated each other. You just did it. Eventually you would learn why. But by then you were already hating.
Also, in the 18th century, slavery was part of normal life. As it had been for centuries. Slavery was often the misfortune of a conquered people. Part of the social strata. Or simply an economic tool. Such as used in Mercantilism. As European powers established colonies, they needed bodies to exploit the raw material and send it back to the mother country. And the ‘godless’ people they were able to buy from African slave traders were perfect. These ‘savages’ were little more than animals. Struggling to live in a hostile environment. They were better off in slavery. In the New World they would have food and shelter. And their masters would protect them from their hostile environment. The way they saw it, they were doing them a favor. Or so went the prevailing thought of the day.
During the Revolutionary War, George Washington commanded an army made up from all the colonies. They were mostly Protestant. But it also included Catholics. So he had to tone down the anti-Catholic sentiment that was pretty pervasive among many of these British Americans. And then there was a march into Canada by General Benedict Arnold. To get the Catholic Canadians (once a French colony) to join the American cause. (They passed on the offer.) And so it was in the Army that the American cause transcended religion. For it was in the army where the Protestant fought side by side with the Catholic. As well as the free black. Who yearned for that liberty, too, that the Americans were fighting for. Giving Washington pause for thought. Protestant. Catholic. Black. White. They were all people. Americans. This thing they were fighting for was greater than the individual colonies. The New World would in fact be a new world. The prejudices of the past would be left in the Old World. And he learned that in the Army. Where America was truly born.
The Three Fifths Compromise Empowers the Planter Elite
It was many of these Army veterans that championed religious freedom. And the abolitionist movements. But the pull of the Deep South was strong. Their planter elite, though a minority of the population, dominated political power. Much like the landed aristocracy of feudal Europe. They had money, power and influence. Their view of the Revolutionary War was different than George Washington’s. They weren’t looking to build anything greater. No. They just wanted to get rid of the British. And go back to the way things were.
With the war won, that’s exactly what a lot of people did. Go back to the way things were. There were problems, though. War debt, for one. And a lack of unanimous consent. The Confederation Congress required a unanimous vote to do anything. Which was a rare thing. The sectional interests were just too strong. So in 1787, they gathered in Philadelphia to write a new constitution. And create a new nation. It wasn’t easy. During the ratification process, some holdouts agreed to ratify if they added a Bill of Rights. James Madison agreed to this and worked tirelessly in the first Congress to deliver on this promise. The issue of slavery? That was a different story.
The Deep South would join only if the subject of slavery was off the table. They agreed. Tabled it for 20 years. Give the South time to figure out how to end slavery. Then they settled on issues of taxation and representation. The majority of the southern population were slaves. If they couldn’t count them to determine representation in the new government, the Deep South would have no say in the new federal government. So they agreed on the Three Fifths Compromise. They would count slaves as 3/5 a person. It was a high price to pay for compromise. For it gave the planter elite of the Deep South a disproportionate vote in Congress. And in the Electoral College. Which meant that this minority in the Deep South determined much of American policy until the Civil War. Thanks to a large black population that couldn’t vote.
Liberal San Francisco: White, Right and Out of Sight
San Francisco is an interesting town. They don’t come much more liberal. Or whiter. Liberals are lucky if they’re 20% of the national population. But a good chunk of that 20% apparently lives in San Francisco. Nancy Pelosi coasted to reelection in 2010 with 80% of the vote even though her national approval numbers were horrible. Her favorable ratings barely broke 10%. In other words, the American people were sick of her and her far left liberal agenda. They voted a bunch of her cronies out of the House of Representatives, and her from the Speakership, transferring control from the Democrats to the Republicans for the first time in a long time. Her views are definitely not America’s views. But they’re clearly San Francisco’s views.
Of course, many of the good people of San Francisco think that the other 80% of Americans are just too dumb to know better. We exasperate them. For they are the enlightened people. The intelligentsia. The caring. And they were the first to drive hybrids. Even South Park ridiculed them for that. Calling San Francisco the smuggest place in America. Where they like the smell of their own farts. And they may very well like to smell their own farts. But you know what they don’t like? Black people (see Blacks and Republicans by Thomas Sowell posted 3/15/2011 on National Review).
The black population of San Francisco is less than half of what it was in 1970, and it fell another 19 percent in the past decade…
Blacks are being forced out of San Francisco — and out of other communities on the San Francisco peninsula — by high housing prices…
The black population in three adjacent counties on the San Francisco peninsula is just under 3 percent of the total population in the 39 communities in those counties.
It so happens that these are counties where voters and the officials they elect are virtually all liberal Democrats. You might be hard pressed to find similarly one-sided conservative Republican communities where blacks are such small percentages of the population.
So, in other words, rich liberals love to have black people vote for them. But they don’t want to live anywhere near them.
AFDC and Abortion and the Black Family
America changed in the 1970s. The sexual revolution was in full force. Women’s liberation. Abortion and birth control. And all the feel-good programs of LBJ’s Great Society to end poverty and racial injustice. The liberals were changing America. The black community. And the neighborhoods of San Francisco.
Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) caused an epidemic in children being born out of wedlock. Because the government was paying single women per baby they had. So they kept having babies. Because an inexperienced young man couldn’t get a job that would match the generosity of the government. And it was a lot easier than being a working single-mom. So kids grew up without a father. Spent a lot of time on the streets. Getting into trouble. This destroyed families in poor neighborhoods. Which also tended to be black neighborhoods. It was the worst of unintended consequences. But it sure did make the recipient of these benefits life-long Democrats. Because if you have no skills and a large family to raise, what else are you going to do but depend on those government benefits?
Of course, liberal policies weren’t all about having babies. They were also helping to provide a lot of abortions, too. To empower women. To fully liberate women and make them equals in the workplace. Because they could now do anything a man could do. Except pee while standing up. But they could fool around like a man. And not have to worry about the consequences. Just like a man. So with abortion, birth control and a sexual revolution going on, you can guess what a lot of people were doing. Having consequence-free fun. If you know what I mean. But much like AFDC, this liberation appears to have hit the black population especially hard. A black woman is three-times as likely as a white woman to get an abortion. And it is the only demographic where abortions exceed live births.
Abortion is a very controversial subject with data that is often politicized. Also, there may be other extenuating circumstances that result in these numbers. But it shows a trend. Liberal policies have unintended consequences. And blacks have suffered a disproportional share of these consequences.
The Democrat Party is the Party of Slavery and Institutionalized Discrimination
So what does this tell us about rich liberals? First of all, they’re mostly white. They claim that they are not the racists yet their actions indicate otherwise (San Francisco is mostly liberal and mostly white). Their views are a minority view. The 2010 midterm elections clearly showed that. Yet they wield some of the greatest political power. How do they do that? By pandering. To the labor unions. The public sector unions. The teachers. That usual bunch that benefits by liberal policies and liberal spending. And, of course, blacks.
When you look at the history, the Democrats haven’t been all that kind to black America. It was the Southern Democrats who did their best to perpetuate the institution of slavery. It was the Southern Democrats that institutionalized discrimination in the South following the Civil War. Yes, the Civil Rights Act was passed by the Johnson administration but it was the Republicans in the House and Senate that made that possible. The Democrats had majorities in both houses but about a third of their members were against it. Whereas only a fifth of the Republicans were against it. In the final House vote, all the Southern Democrats needed was to get 37% of the Republicans to vote against it to stop its passage. Instead, 80% of Republicans voted in favor of it. And then, of course, there’s AFDC. Thomas Sowell blames this (and the liberal welfare state) for destroying the black family. And the black abortion stats would probably be called genocide in another country. Some even call it that here.
Which brings us back to the teachers. Because when you look at these numbers, it is clear that liberal policies have not been good to black families. But the teachers are in tight with the liberals. I mean, with their generous pay and benefit packages they get without the taxpayer having a say in their contract negotiations, why wouldn’t they? The government takes care of them and they take care of government. They emphasize multiculturalism, fairness and progressive thought. And downplay history. The Founding Fathers play minor roles in today’s textbooks. But students today can all tell us that the Founding Fathers owned slaves. But they seem to forget the part about Abraham Lincoln, the Great Emancipator, being a Republican. And that the freed blacks voted for Republicans to protect themselves from racist Southern Democrats.
Meet the New World. Same as the Old World.
And then along comes Barack Obama. The ideal liberal candidate. And first black presidential candidate. Because of our public education there is a lot of white guilt over slavery. So a lot of white America would probably vote for Obama to assuage that guilt. Which included a large part of those crucial independent voters. Things were looking up. But could he deliver the black vote? He graduated from Harvard Law School. Columbia University. He’s an Ivy League guy. Very professorial. He could lecture the people. So well that it offended some. The Reverend Jesse Jackson said then candidate Obama talked down to black people. He didn’t like that in the least. Even said that he wanted to “cut his nuts off.” So it wasn’t a sure thing. The black vote.
Of course, Obama won that election. He took 53% of the vote to McCain‘s 46%. And the black vote? All but 4% voted for Obama. No one gets 96% of the vote. Unless you’re a dictator in a third world country. With blacks making up approximately 12% of the U.S. population, it is clear that the black vote determined the election. For if the black vote followed the same percentage break down of the general vote, McCain would have won the election.
So here we are, some 150 years after the Civil War and the black population is still being exploited by the political elite. The planter elite maintained power for half a century thanks to the Three Fifth Compromise. And liberal Democrats today use the liberal welfare state to make as many blacks as possible dependent on government. Use their control over the public school system to hide the failure of their policies. Their destruction of the black family. And their racist past. To maintain their political power. And minority rule. Some things never change.
Meet the New World. Same as the Old World. Sadly.
Tags: abolitionist, abortion, AFDC, African slave traders, Aid to Families with Dependent Children, America, black America, black community, black family, black neighborhoods, black population, black vote, blacks, Canada, Catholics, Civil Rights Act, Civil War, Deep South, Democrat Party, Democrats, exploited blacks, far left liberal agenda, Founding Fathers, France, George Washington, government benefits, Great Britain, liberal, Liberal Agenda, liberal policies, Liberal San Francisco, liberal welfare state, New World, Obama, Old World, planter elite, political elite, Protestants, public education, racists, Reformation, Religion, religious freedom, Republicans, Revolutionary War, rich liberals, San Francisco, sectional interests, slave traders, slavery, Southern Democrats, teachers, Three-Fifths Compromise, unintended consequences, welfare state, white guilt
Mercantilism brought Slaves to the New World
Slaves were useful in more ways than one. As a source of labor. And a political pawn. The political elite has oppressed and exploited them for a couple of centuries in the New World. Though the oppression has stopped, the exploitation continues today with their descendants.
Colonization isn’t easy. It takes a long time. Longer in a hostile land. You start out by establishing colonies. The colonists first figure out how to survive. Then they sow the seeds of future generations. But there was a problem with this in the New World. A hostile environment. And the long time it took to raise a generation or two. And this was a big problem. For the European monarchies that were supporting these colonists did so for economic reasons. And time was money. They were to exploit the New World’s resources and ship these raw materials back to Europe. That’s how mercantilism worked. You raced around the world to find sources of raw material, establish colonies and then ship the raw material back to Europe. Where the Europeans processed them into finished goods. These goods were then sold back to the colonists. Or other export markets. To establish a positive balance of trade. Finished goods out. Gold, bullion, silver, etc., in.
That was the European model then in use. So unskilled labor was in great demand in these new colonies. Enslaving the local indigenous populations didn’t prove too successful. They could escape and disappear into a familiar environment that was friendly to them. So that’s why they imported Africans into the New World. They were a long way from home. And the local environment was just as hostile to them as it was to their white slave owners. With these Africans, the colonists were able to exploit their resources far quicker than they could have had they waited for their own numbers to multiply sufficiently to do the same work. Of course, this lead to a skewed population. Where a white minority ruled over a black majority. Worse still, slavery was only growing in the South. And that created a problem in the distribution of political power in the new federal government. Slaves didn’t vote or pay taxes. But there were a lot of them. If they were not counted to determine congressional representation, the non-slave holding North would dominate the new federal government.
The Planter Elite gets the 3/5 Compromise and an Unfair Advantage
First the African slaves were used as pawns by European monarchs to enrich their mercantile empires. Then they were used by politicians in a fledgling new nation to obtain an unfair advantage in political power. These Africans just couldn’t catch a break. Slavery was concentrated in the Deep South. In the hands of the planter elite. Though few in numbers they dominated political power in their states. And they planned on doing the same in the new federal government. To protect their interests. Wealth. And power.
But to do that there was that pesky problem getting in their way. The fact that the planter elite was a small minority of the population. It was different in the north. Political power was representative of the population. Where most of the population paid taxes and voted. And they were going to extend this theory of representative government to the new federal government. The North wanted to count all people (including slaves) in determining the states’ tax obligations. The South didn’t. The South wanted to count all people (including slaves) in determining representation in the House of Representatives and the Electoral College (that elected the president). The North didn’t. So they compromised. They would count slaves as three-fifths of a person. This compromise favored the North on the tax obligation issue. But it favored the South on the political representation issue. As a result of the compromise, the South would dominate the House of Representatives and the presidency until the Civil War.
So you see why slavery was so important to the South. It gave them an unfair advantage in the new federal government. Thus empowering them to protect their peculiar institution of slavery. Their interests. Wealth. And power.
The Founding Fathers had to Accept Slavery to Establish a Nation based on Liberty
The Founding Fathers saw the inconsistency of slavery and their founding ideal. Liberty. Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, John Jay and Alexander Hamilton were northerners. Some were already abolitionists. Some would eventually join that movement. George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison were southerners. They owned plantations. Worked with slave-labor. Washington actually looked into converting to paid-labor but the realities of the day made the continuation of slave-labor the humane thing to do on his plantation (changing to paid-laborers would have broken up the slave families). He is the only Founding Father that freed his slaves (after the death of his wife Martha). And his will stipulated that his heirs help the newly freed people integrate into free society.
Jefferson and Madison clearly prospered on the institution of slavery. (Well, the Jefferson family had. Jefferson was a genius in so many ways. Except in the way of making money.) Their wealth came from the plantations. And their political power rested with their brethren planter elite. Should they move against them they would fall from power. And should these ‘moderates’ fall from power, southern extremists would replace them. Who wished to see no restrictions on slave owning or on the slave trade. They were expansionists. They wanted to see their way of life, and their slavery, expanded into the new territories. They would never have gone to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia in 1787. They would never have ceded any power to the northern interests. There would have been no compromise between North and South. And the new nation might never have been born.
Jefferson and Madison were tainted by America’s original sin. There’s no disputing that. But there would have been no America without them. They were the bridge to the Deep South. So to make this new nation based on liberty possible, the Founding Fathers had to accept that keeping some of the people in bondage was necessary. For awhile, at least. The North promised the South they wouldn’t talk about the issue again for twenty years. And Jefferson and Madison reassured the planter elite that their way of life would not change. In more private conversations, they assured them that the new federal government would forever speak with a Southern accent. In 20 years time, the North hoped the southerners would have fixed this southern problem. Or that the institution itself would just fade away. While the Deep South hoped it would become so entrenched that it would be impossible to have these discussions again.
The Cotton Gin, the Fugitive Slave Act and Civil War
As it turned out, events would favor the South. Thanks to an ingenious invention called the cotton gin. Eli Whitney unwittingly gave the Deep South what they needed. For slavery was on the decline. The big slave crops were not very profitable crops (rice, tobacco, indigo and cotton). Planters were diversifying. Requiring farm workers with multiple skills. Which favored the paid-laborer. But the cotton gin took one of those unprofitable crops and made it profitable. By turning a labor-intensive chore (separating the seed from the cotton) into an automated process. And King Cotton was born.
This fanned new life into a dying institution. The Southern economy became a cotton economy. And the decline in slave-labor did an abrupt reversal. Fortunes were built on cotton. As was political power. And thanks to the unfair advantage given to the Deep South by the Three-Fifths Compromise, the Southern way flourished. Until immigration flooded into the industrialized north, that is. Even their unfair advantage could not stop the inevitable. The political power in the House of Representatives shifted to the North. And this spelled the beginning of the end for the planter elite. Compromise no longer favored the Deep South. And there was a lot of secession talk down there. A series of compromises followed in an attempt to keep the Union together. Such as the Fugitive Slave Act that forced the federal government to interfere with states’ rights. In the North. Forcing these states to return runaway slaves to the plantations from whence they came. The 1850s saw a march towards Civil War. And in April of 1861, General P.G.T. Beauregard ordered his cannon to commence firing on Fort Sumter in Charlestown’s harbor. Some four bloody years later with over 600,000 dead, the South lost. The slaves were free. And the Southern economy collapsed.
The great Republican, Abraham Lincoln, saved the Union. And freed the slaves. A fact not lost on the slaves. The planter elite were Southern Democrats. The party of slavery. So you can guess how the newly freed slaves voted. That’s right, the freed slaves voted Republican. Because Republicans ended slavery. Despite the Democrats best efforts to maintain their peculiar institution. Which makes one scratch his head today. Today, blacks vote predominantly Democrat. This same party that oppressed and exploited them throughout American history. So what changed? Well, the truth is, not much. Liberal Democrats continue to exploit the blacks. But with a little political sleight of hand, the exploiter becomes the protector. Champion of civil rights. And the corrector of past wrongs.
Liberal Generosity Destroys the Black Family
You see, liberal Democrats have the same problem the planter elite had. They’re a minority of the population. Yet they covet political power. So how do you get political power in a land with free elections? Without slavery and the unfair advantage of the Three Fifths Compromise? Simple. You have to figure out some other way to exploit these slave descendants. Their answer? Enslave them to government.
Government has the power to tax. Which gives them a lot of money. And power. So the liberal Democrat solution is to tax and spend and bestow government benefits in exchange for votes. And the liberal welfare state was born. Gave so much to the black family that they soon become dependent on this liberal generosity. And the black family who survived slavery. Reconstruction. Rampant and systemic discrimination. Was destroyed. A helping hand (welfare) became a way of life. Aid to Families with Dependent Children encouraged single women to have children. And men to abandon these children. For the state would step in and be father. Turns out the state was a horrible father, though. Kids grew up lacking fatherly discipline and guidance. And they drifted into trouble. Public housing grouped these fatherless children together. And sent them to school together. Spreading that trouble and bad behavior to the schools. So both the schools and public housing suffered from the new inner city disease. Blight. Spawned by the liberal welfare state. Leaving no escape for these inner city kids.
Or so says conservative economist Thomas Sowell. Born in 1930, he lived through much of that rampant and systemic discrimination. And the creation of the liberal welfare state and its affect on the black family. He has firsthand experience as a black man. And a lifetime of academic research and published works on the subject. The liberals reject him and accuse him of racism. Because he dares to say the liberal welfare state has done more harm than good. Worse, he backs that up with some compelling research. Unable to attack the message, they attack the messenger. Which is what people usually do when they have lost the argument.
Though their programs proved a failure, all was not lost. Sure, they destroyed the black family, but they destroyed them with an addiction. Addiction to the welfare state. And one thing addicts can’t do is walk away from their addiction. So they keep voting to maintain their fix of government benefits. They keep voting Democrat. Which was the goal all along. Not to alleviate any of their suffering. And unlike the planter elite, the liberal Democrat is not getting only three-fifths of a vote from their black population. They’re getting the whole thing.
The planter elite would no doubt be impressed by this political sleight of hand. And kicking themselves for not thinking of it themselves.
Tags: abolitionists, Abraham Lincoln, African slaves, Africans, America, balance of trade, black family, black majority, Civil War, colonies, colonization, congressional representation, cotton, cotton economy, cotton gin, Deep South, Eli Whitney, Europe, European monarchies, Europeans, federal government, Founding Fathers, Fugitive Slave Act, Jefferson, King Cotton, Liberal Democrats, Madison, mercantilism, New World, North, northerners, paid-labor, peculiar institution, plantations, planter elite, political elite, political power, Republican, secession, slave labor, slave owners, slave trade, slavery, slaves, South, Southern Democrats, southern problem, southerners, states' rights, Three-Fifths Compromise, Washington, welfare state, white minority