Week in Review
The Democrats get the youth vote. Because the Democrats aren’t these kids’ parents. After a lifetime (i.e., high school) of their parents telling them ‘no’ after they turn 18 they turn on their parents. And start voting Democrat. Wait until you’re married before having sex? I think not, Mom & Dad. Because there isn’t anything wrong with having cheap meaningless sex with a bunch of different people. The Democrats understand this. And provide these young women with birth control and access to abortion so they can have a lot of casual sex without any consequences. Of course, a lot of this sex won’t be very good (see Devout Catholics Have Better Sex, Study Says by Elizabeth Flock posted 7/17/2013 on US News and World Report—an older article appearing in their Twitter feed this past week).
Devout, married Catholics have the best sex of any demographic group, the Family Research Council said at an event Wednesday, pointing to a collection of studies from the last several decades.
The socially conservative Christian group relied heavily on statistics from the University of Chicago’s last National Health and Social Life Survey, conducted in 1992, which found the most enjoyable and most frequent sex occurring among married people, those who attended church weekly – any church, whether Catholic or not – and people who had the least sexual partners…
The notion that Catholics have better sex isn’t a new one, especially coming from Catholics. In 1994, Andrew Greeley, a Catholic sociologist and priest, published “Sex: The Catholic Experience,” which released a litany of new statistics: 68 percent of Catholics professed to have sex at least once a week versus 56 percent of non-Catholics; 30 percent of Catholics had bought erotic underwear versus 20 percent non-Catholics; and 80 percent of devout Catholic women approved of having sex for pleasure alone.
Girls go to parties where guys ply them with alcohol. To get them drunk enough to lower their inhibitions. A Girl may want to be relaxed enough to be with a guy she likes. While a guy may just want to get her drunk so she can’t say ‘no’. One thing for sure, though, whatever happens won’t be the subject of any romance novel. It could be a scene in a porn movie. But it sure won’t end up on the big screen in a love story.
Let’s face it, any sex where being inebriated is a prerequisite just isn’t going to be that good. Or memorable. Further, it is likely to leave a woman filled with shame or regret. As she worries about what she did. With whom she did it with. And then the questions to fret over. Did she take any precautions? Is she pregnant? Did she catch a sexually transmitted disease? Did someone make a video of her while she was passed out and naked? Doing things to her? Is she going to see herself on the Internet? Will her friends and her family see her on the Internet? Her professors? Her boss? Will this come up should she decide to run for public office?
To have the same frequency of sex married women have may leave her with more feelings of shame and regret. And an emptiness. For while she is having sex a married woman is making love. For a married woman doesn’t have to get drunk to lower her inhibitions. For there are no inhibitions to lower. She doesn’t have to worry about catching an STD. And if she gets pregnant it may be because she wanted to get pregnant. Also, there is no shame and regret the day after. For a married woman is not coming home disheveled the following morning. Where her neighbors can see her wearing the same clothes she had on the night before. And see her underwear fall out of her purse while digging out her keys.
For a married woman sex is about love-making. Sharing intimate moments with the person she loves. Someone she wants to please. Just as her husband wants to please her. As well as honor her and protect her. He won’t be posting any videos of her passed out and naked on the Internet. Sure, they may leave the bathroom door open, but there’s honor and protection. As well as an active sex life spiced up with things like erotic underwear.
So what are the Democrats really doing to our young women by being anti-parents? Opening them up to a lot of shame and regret. And worse. Democrats are ruining their sex lives. For using birth control and abortion to stay unmarried only makes their sex lives less fulfilling. At least according to this study. And it’s rather ironic that the women who oppose birth control and abortion (i.e., Catholics) are having better sex lives than those who don’t. So once again their parents were right. Even when it comes to waiting until marriage to have sex. For if you do it will apparently blow your socks off.
Tags: abortion, birth control, casual sex, Catholic, Catholic women, Democrats, inhibitions, kids, love, married, married woman, parents, regret, sex, sex life, shame
Week in Review
The left is intolerant of so many things. Cigarettes. Sugary beverages. Hamburgers. And our lack of exercising, our insufficient consumption of fresh fruits & vegetables and our unwillingness to buy electric cars. So they have implemented a lot of taxes, subsidies and regulations to alter our behavior. To make us behave more ‘correctly’. And they are always telling us what we should and what we should not do. Except when it comes to sex and drugs. No. Here they pass out free birth control. And make marijuana legal in Colorado and Washington. Despite all of that unfiltered first, second and third-hand smoke. Odd how these things pose no risk to us unlike drinking a large sugary beverage.
And it’s just not in the United States. All around the world those on the left are telling their people how to live correctly. Except, of course, when it comes to drugs. And sex. Because kids are going to have sex no matter what we say. And if we tell them they shouldn’t it’s only going to make them want to have sex more. Although it is funny that argument doesn’t hold up for cigarettes, sugary beverages, hamburgers, etc. No. For these they can roll up a newspaper and whack us across the nose all day long. Figuratively, of course. But when it comes to sex it’s more of a, “Whoa, now, let’s not say anything hasty here. For who are we to say what is right or wrong for an individual?” But with rising HIV infections perhaps we should be telling our sons and daughters that something bad can happen from having sex. And they would be better off if they didn’t have so much of it before entering into a monogamous, long-term relationship. For if we did and they did over 10% of our populations would not be infected with HIV (see Condoms rebranded in South Africa as HIV infections rise by AFP) posted 4/3/2014 on Yahoo! News).
South Africa is seeking to rebrand its free condoms to appeal to young people after a new study showed rising HIV infections and flagging contraception use, the health department said on Thursday…
South Africa has the world’s highest number of people living with HIV, a crisis that has seen millions of people placed on a vast state-sponsored treatment programme.
Around 6.4 million people — 12.2 percent of the population — were living with HIV or AIDS in 2012.
During the Eighties we didn’t know any better about HIV. But we do now. Even young people. It’s why we give them free condoms. Because of the risk of HIV (among other risks). So it’s frustrating to see risky behavior in young people. Especially those living in a nation with the highest number of people living with HIV. When 12.2% of the population lives with HIV or AIDS it can’t be a secret that HIV is a serious risk. But young people still engage in risky behavior. Which is useful to those on the left. For it helps them win elections. For they are the cool party that doesn’t think drugs are all that bad. And that a little promiscuity isn’t going to kill you. “You’ll be fine,” they say on the left. “As long as you don’t smoke a cigarette, drink a sugary beverage or eat a hamburger you should be able to enjoy all the sex and drugs you want to. Because sex and drugs can’t hurt you. Only those other things can. Well, those things. And global warming. Those are the things to worry about. Not catching HIV or AIDS.” At least this is the message they’re giving our kids.
Tags: cigarettes, condoms, drugs, free condoms, hamburgers, HIV, HIV infections, risky behavior, sex, sex and drugs, South Africa, sugary beverages, young people
Week in Review
Going to college is very expensive. In fact, tuition costs seem to rise as much as health care cost yet no one blames the colleges and universities for being profit whores. Odd. No one ever complains about the high cost of education. Unless they’re attacking Republicans for not approving more spending to help subsidize what these profit whores at our colleges and universities are charging our students. Worse, these profit whores are selling a lot of worthless degrees to these unsuspecting students (see Four Foolish Majors To Avoid by Terence Loose posted 2/7/2013 on Yahoo! Education).
Opportunity Killer #1: Liberal Arts
Unemployment Rate for Recent College Graduates: 9.2 percent*
“I don’t think the majority of [liberal arts grads] are going to be employable because they don’t come out of those degrees with any marketable skills,” says Heathfield. “But even worse than that, they spend the money to go four years to college and then get a job that pays $30,000 a year with no upward prospects.”
Opportunity Killer #2: Philosophy and Religious Studies
Unemployment Rate for Recent College Graduates: 10.8 percent*
Can you remember the last time you saw a “Wanted” ad that said: “Looking for a really smart person who can solve why I exist”? Neither can we – and we’re guessing even Plato could recognize the need for practical skills. It seems like today’s employers certainly do, too.
Opportunity Killer #3: Information Systems
Unemployment Rate for Recent College Graduates: 11.7 percent*
Quick, what exactly do information systems majors study? Not sure? Neither are most employers, says Heathfield. That’s not to say this degree doesn’t build good skills; it’s just that if you’re interested in computer technology, it’s best to earn a degree that is easily understood, like a bachelor’s in computer science or computer engineering, says Heathfield.
Opportunity Killer #4: Architecture
Unemployment Rate for Recent College Graduates: 13.9 percent*
There are few things as inspirational as a beautiful building or home. That said, thanks to the massive hit the housing and commercial real estate industries took in the past decade, this degree may not lead to a good job outlook.
Apart from architecture what do these degrees have in common? They don’t have a lot of math or science in them. That is, they’re easier than, say, degrees in electrical engineering or theoretical physics. Could this play a part in why students choose these degrees? These kids who are going away from home for the first time. To a raucous college campus. Where there is booze, drugs and sex. You know, they even rate colleges by their party index. So, yes, kids choose easy degrees so they can go to college and party. Where they can enjoy booze, drugs and sex away from the disapproving glare of their parents. Even earn a starring role in a Girls Gone Wild video when they take the partying up a notch on spring break.
So when students protest in an Occupy Wall Street movement because they can’t get a job this is why. A lot of them have degrees in these foolish majors. Which on top of President Obama’s economic policies is not a recipe for gainful employment. But these kids will have those great college memories. Which they will be reminded of. Every time they can’t make a payment on that colossal student loan debt that those good times cost them.
Tags: booze, college, drugs, foolish majors, party, profit whores, sex, tuition costs, universities, worthless degrees
Week in Review
“Sex is natural. Sex is fun. Sex is best when it’s one on one.” As in monogamy. Words from George Michael from his 1987 hit I Want Your Sex. As it turns out it was very sage advice (see Sexual health experts warn of new syphilis threat by Adam Brimelow posted 11/9/2011 on the BBC).
Sexual health experts say they are deeply concerned about several outbreaks of syphilis among heterosexual teenagers…
Since the late 1990s there has been a sharp rise in cases of syphilis. Most of these have been in homosexual men, often in their 20s or 30s.
But recently there have been several small outbreaks across Britain of syphilis in heterosexual teenagers – described in detail in the International Journal of STD and Aids.
Guess they didn’t take George Michael’s advice.
Martin Murchie, president of the Society of Sexual Health Advisers, agrees that the number of cases diagnosed may just be the “tip of the iceberg”.
He says increasing numbers of people, including teenagers, are arranging to have anonymous sex through social networks. He warns that this is making the task of tracing sexual contacts even harder.
“The way that people meet for sex is very different and changing in society. That in itself can be problematic in trying to trace contacts because some people may change their username that they had originally on the social network site, or the health service itself may not be able to access the social networking site.”
In the old days you could trace the source of your syphilis back to the bar where you engaged the services of some prostitute. Where it took copious amounts of alcohol to engage in such risky behavior. For everyone knew these prostitutes had some SDT. But in today’s modern world where we tell women it’s empowering to have sex whenever they want it’s a different story. The syph is back. And it’s not confided to seedy bars where drunken men engage the services of prostitutes. It’s in the general population. Thanks to new sexual attitudes. And social media.
Dr Patrick French, a consultant in Genito Urinary Medicine in London, says there is no room for any complacency. He says syphilis is a serious disease that can lead to heart disease, stroke and dementia, and raises the risk of acquiring HIV.
“The worry is that if syphilis gets into the wider sexually active population of young people it could then become a common and endemic infection. Before syphilis became unusual in the UK in the 1980s it was a major cause of ill health and that’s no longer the case. So it’s a very important infection to try and prevent.”
So syphilis can be as bad as AIDS. Fatal. And it can even make you more at risk of getting AIDS. As far as diseases go, syphilis is a bad one. But how do you warn your children? Without sounding like you’re just trying to stop them from having fun? So typical of a parent? That’s more of a rhetorical question. Because you can’t tell kids anything. For they know everything.
There’re not going to listen to us. Just as they didn’t listen to George Michael. Pity. Because George was giving good advice in the late Eighties. Unfortunately, he was just another ‘old guy’ by the late Nineties. And no longer popular enough for the kids to listen to.
As a side note, these are the people liberal politicians everywhere are relying on to shape policy. They may not understand economics. Or fiscal policy. But we need to listen to them. While they protest the 1% everywhere. Because they are so mature. And smart. Even though their irresponsible behavior is bringing back a near extinct disease.
Tags: prostitute, risky behavior, SDT, sex, social media, syphilis
Like Father like Daughter – Even after You’ve Quit Drugs and Gone Conservative
It was about the 7th grade when kids I knew were getting into drugs. I can remember being at a McDonald’s once after a high school football game (I went to that game with my brother and his friends). Some of my 7th grade classmates were there. When one saw me he pulled a joint out of his jacket and waved it in front of me, saying, “Do you want a doobie?” He was an old friend. He became a burn out. I didn’t. So he made fun of me in front of his new stoner friends. Incidentally, a couple of these stoner friends are now dead.
One of those guys was a pretty good friend of mine. I turned him on to Monty Python. He could do all the voices. And the skits. Had them all memorized. Funny guy. He became a stoner in high school. He tried to get high off whatever he could. He came to school with a busted lip once. His father punched him. When he caught him sniffing gasoline in the garage. His father tried to help him. Knock some sense into him. Maybe he did. For when he died in a car crash (he was doing something like 80 on a 35 mph street and tried to pass someone. Clipped the guy’s rear bumper and flipped his car over and over again), he wasn’t driving stoned. He was driving drunk.
I once worked with a guy who was a reformed burn out. He was a hardcore stoner in middle school. Skipped a lot of school to get high. Then he had a kid when he was in the 11th grade. He then quit school, quit drugs and pumped gas. Changed his life. He became super dad. He was a conservative and father of 5 when I met him. Sometimes when he was talking to you he’d stop in mid-sentence, lost. He’d then laugh and say something about all those lost brain cells he’d like to have back. He had dreams of sending his daughter (an honor student) to that conservative college in Michigan. Hillsdale College. He wasn’t happy that she wanted to go to a party school instead. But, at least, she was going to college. And she did. Until she got pregnant. And dropped out. Like father like daughter. Well, sort of.
Sex, Drugs and Hip Hop – ‘Cool’ Equity for the Responsible Drug User
Once upon a time it was sex, drugs and rock and roll. Now it’s probably a little more hip hop than rock and roll. But it’s still the same. Young kids engage in risky behavior. They don’t practice prudence in their choices. For them, it’s all about the id. The pursuit of pleasure. And the avoidance of things unpleasant. In other words, childlike behavior. Even though we should know better. Pleasure now. Pain never. We’re only here for a short time. And it would be a shame that if you died young you didn’t have a lot of pleasure first.
A lot of kids get pleasure from getting high. Drugs are a part of sex, drugs and hip hop, remember. Not only is it fun, but it says cool all over it. Rebellious. You get some ‘cool’ equity with the ‘in crown’. Until someone dies. But after a suitable period of mourning, life goes on. I mean, the kid who dies, why, they were just stupid. Those who say that will say it can’t happen to them. Because they get high responsibly.
But there are addictions. And there are fatal overdoses. There’s AIDS passed via shared needles. Heart attacks from cocaine rushes. Neglected children as a parent gets high in the next room. Violent crime by someone whacked out on PCP who can feel no pain. Organ failure (we exclude drug addicts from transplant lists because their drug use will only kill their new transplants, too). Broken marriages. Lost families. Dead children. Ruined careers. Stroke. Diminished motor functions. Etc. Of course, these people all wanted these things to happen. Because all drug users who haven’t yet had these things happen to them say these things never will for they are responsible drug users. And as my daughter often says, “Yeah, whatever.” The carnage of drug abuse begs to differ with the responsible users. There is a social cost to drug use. And it’s a pretty hefty price at that.
Sex and Drugs Make Happy Pimps
Not yet mentioned are the costs we incur because of the illegality of drugs. Victim crimes. And, of course, victimless crimes. When something is illegal, it becomes expensive. Very, very expensive. And one of the downsides of being an addict compounds the problem of trying to pay for these expensive drugs. Drug addicts have erratic lives. They live from high to high. Which doesn’t mesh well with an 8-hour work day. Some can. For awhile. But eventually the addiction takes control and they lose their jobs. So, to support their habits, some become thieves. Do a little breaking and entering. A little pock picking. A little car jacking. Eventually ending up in jail for the same reasons they can’t get regular work. The addiction takes control. And they make dumb mistakes. And get caught.
And then there are those who are not stealing but selling. Sexual favors. Desperate for their next fix, they walk the streets looking for a john. The pain of withdrawal will make them take great risks. Some johns may beat them up. Rob them (for what little they may have). Kill them. They may receive a sexually transmitted disease. Or pass one on. They may get pimped out buy someone who pays them in their drug fixes. Until they’re no longer marketable. In which case their pimp may throw them back onto the street. Or worse. And if she dies? So what. There are always more where she came from. Sex and drugs. What pimp could ask for anything more?
Addiction is a powerful thing. People will do things they never thought they would for their next fix. Combine that with the illegality of drugs and it’s a very profitable enterprise. Not for the uses. But for the dealers. Who get a very high price for their product. And an addicted customer that must keep buying.
John Lennon and Nancy Reagan May Have Agreed to ‘Just Say No’
America’s southern border is bleeding. The U.S. demand for illegal drugs is a coveted market. And drug gangs are very protective of their territory. Drug violence is appalling. Much like it was in the days of Al Capone during Prohibition. Even worse. In Capone’s day, they may have sent a message to a cop by shooting him. Today they behead a cop and send the severed head back to police headquarters to get their message across. And the violence is spilling over into civilian life near the border. Kidnapping. Ransoms. Murders. It’s so bad that the federal government has posted signs on American soil advising Americans that they are not safe on that American soil.
So there are two sides of the decriminalization of drugs coin. The one is the social costs of drug use. They’re illegal now and the social costs are staggering. Decriminalizing drugs is not likely to reduce addiction and all that comes with it. On the other hand, illegal drugs are expensive which makes addiction that much more costly. Which makes some users resort to crime to support their habits. And it empowers drug gangs. It would appear neither choice is very appealing.
Of course, there is one option that would get rid of both problems. Like Nancy Reagan said. Just say ‘no’. And if people just said ‘no’, that lucrative U.S. market would disappear. No addiction. No drug wars. Imagine that. A world in which there were no drugs to kill or die for. Even John Lennon, a recovered heroin addict and peacenik, could appreciate that.
Tags: 'Cool' Equity, addiction, burn out, conservative, decriminalization of drugs, doobie, driving stone, drug abuse, drug gangs, drug users, drug violence, drug wars, drugs, drugs and hip hop, drugs and rock and roll, fatal overdose, get high, getting high, Hillsdale College, John Lennon, joint, just say no, like father like daughter, lost brain cells, Nancy Reagan, overdose, pimp, quit drugs, responsible drug user, sex, sex and drugs, social costs, stoner, stoner friends
We’ve all heard the joke. What’s coyote ugly? That’s when you wake up with an extremely ugly person in bed lying on your arm. After a night of heavy drinking. You’re fairly certain you had sex. You’re not 100% sure because you can’t remember anything. But here the two of you are. Naked. The circumstantial evidence is pretty damning. You want to get out. Fast. Instead of waking your lover, you chew your arm off so you can slip away quietly. Like a coyote will do if caught in a steel-jaw trap.
The lesson here is, of course, to drink in moderation. For when we drink to excess, we sometimes do things we wouldn’t normally do sober. But we do. Drink to excess. And get drunk. And, boy, when we do, some of us really do. Make a real mess of their lives, too. You see, drunken husbands do not make happy wives. Or good fathers. Especially when drunken husbands beat up their wives, spend their paychecks at the corner saloon, have sex with prostitutes and catch syphilis (which they then pass on to their wives and soon to be born children).
For these reasons, wives have been behind various temperance movements throughout history. And they have had modest success. If you ever found yourself in a dry county thirsting for an adult beverage, you can thank these ladies. But Prohibition? That’s a different story. That took Big Government. The Progressives. Who thought they knew best what was for the common good.
DO AS I SAY, NOT AS I DO
Wives have suffered unfairly from the affects of alcohol. But during the 19th century, their power was limited. They had to rely on grass-roots movements. And their churches. Which had moral authority as we were much more religious back then. Most drunken husbands knew they were behaving poorly. When sober. But things changed in the 20th century. The powers of the government grew. This power and new sciences (like eugenics) made some believe they could make a better society by passing enlightened laws. (And make better people in the case of eugenics).
We call it social engineering. Using the power of the state to change human behavior. Well, change it for those who are not apparatchiks of the state. The elite Progressives, including the ladies of high society, still drank. For it wasn’t illegal to drink adult beverages. Only to manufacture, sell, or transport them. So it was the poorer elements of society who felt the impact of Prohibition. And the immigrants. Who the social elites blamed for all the drinking woes. For people in their strata of society didn’t have drinking problems. So there was no reason to punish them. The elites. They weren’t the problem. It was the poor. And the immigrants. They’re the ones government needed to keep from drinking themselves to ruin.
So while the elites still enjoyed their intoxicating beverages in the safety of their mansions and clubs, Al Capone and other bootleggers fought for turf. For control of the illegal liquor trade. Shooting each other with Thompson Machine Guns in our public streets. That’s a .45 caliber round. It makes big holes. And shatters bone. A lot of these rounds were flying through our public streets. And they hit more than just gangsters.
Prohibition modified some behavior. But at great cost. Congress repealed it in 1933. In part to stem the liquor violence. And part because the Great Depression was too depressing sober.
JUST SAY NO
I once worked at a small office in a bad part of town. One day a woman knocked on the door. She asked if that ‘short guy’ that opens the gates in the morning was around. I said no. Then she asked me if I wanted to have a little fun. I said, “Thank you, but no.” My secretary had come to the door while I was talking to her. After I closed the door, she told me that woman just lost a lot of weight. And that she probably had AIDS.
Women like her were common in the neighborhood. They sold sex for drug money. When they weren’t with a John they were getting high. Men, too. One time, this 6-foot-plus behemoth in a skirt was walking in the street shouting something incoherent. Our driver discovered he was a guy. When he lunged through his open window while turning at the corner. I don’t know what scared him more. The assault. Or the fact that she was a he.
By the way, that short guy that opens the gates? He was married. And had a couple of daughters. God only knows what he gave his wife.
Drug addiction is not good. No one’s life ever got better by being addicted to drugs. None of these people ever planned on drug addiction. It just happened. Somehow. One day you’re just partying with some friends. Then the next thing you know you’re turning tricks or stealing to support your habit. If you have money it’s a different story. Then you can party until you kill yourself. John Belushi overdosed from a heroin/cocaine cocktail called a speedball. Chris Farley, too. It’s unlikely that the speedball was their first high. They probably started out with something less potent. Like marijuana. The entry drug of choice. Only when that drug loses its charm do people step up to something a little more potent.
Of course, if you don’t start, chances are you won’t move up to something more potent. This was the idea behind Nancy Reagan’s anti-drug program. Stop the kids from starting. To resist peer pressure. To just say no. Her program did modify some behavior. Kids did use fewer drugs. But she was Ronald Reagan’s wife. The Left didn’t like him. Or her. So they ridiculed her program as being simplistic. Discontinued it. And drug use by kids increased.
Like Capone and his fellow bootleggers, the illegal drug trade is controlled by gangs. And they, too, fight over turf. But those involved at the street level of the drug trade today are a lot younger. During the days of Prohibition, kids played with toy guns. Today, they’re playing with real guns. Not so much playing but killing each other. And innocent bystanders. In drive-by shootings. Why? Because drugs get you money. And money gets you power. Put all that together and it’s very seductive to kids from broken homes in the hood. Who have nothing. And have nothing to lose. It’s almost romantic. Fighting. And dying. A regular gangster. Living in a gangster paradise.
Once in, though, it’s hard to get out. The song Gangsta’s Paradise (by Coolio featuring L.V. from the 1995 Movie Dangerous Minds) laments about that paradise. “Tell me why are we so blind to see. That the ones we hurt are you and me.”
You get higher up in the echelon and the violence gets worse. You can see that on America’s southern border. And further south. Kidnappings. Beheadings. And other unspeakable things. Because of the big money in illegal drugs. Like there was in bootlegging. Make something illegal that people still want and will buy, and that something becomes a very profitable commodity indeed.
DAMNED IF YOU DO, DAMNED IF YOU DON’T
So what’s the answer? What is the best course of action for the common good? We can keep drugs illegal. And continue to fight the war on drugs. And watch the violence escalate as people fight to control this illicit trade. Or we can decriminalize drugs. Make them easily accessible. And cheap. The drug gangs would go the way of the bootlegger gangs. And the crack/meth whore in the street won’t have to perform as many sexual acts to support her habit.
Alcohol is legal today. And there are a lot of social costs because of that. But the majority of people who do drink are not driving under the influence or beating their wives. Or getting syphilis from a prostitute hanging out at the corner saloon. Wouldn’t it be the same for drugs?
Kids drink. Even though they can’t legally buy alcohol. But the worse thing they can do is kill someone while driving a car. Or get killed in a car driven by another drunken kid. Or kill themselves from binge drinking. Or get pregnant because they got drunk at a party. Or get infected with a venereal disease because they got drunk at a party and had sex. These are very bad things. But they’re not an addiction. Sure, you can become an alcoholic, but a lot of kids don’t like the taste of the adult beverages they’re consuming. They’re just doing it for the party buzz. And vomiting after. It takes awhile, for some, to get over that hump where those awful tasting beverages don’t taste so awful anymore. But drugs? They’re tasteless. There isn’t a delivery system ‘hump’ to get over. Which makes the addiction process that much easier. And where there is only one kind of drunk, there are all sorts of highs. New and different drugs to explore. When you get bored with the drug du jour. So, no. It probably wouldn’t be the same with alcohol. It would probably be worse.
THE LESSER OF EVILS
Often the choice comes down to a lesser of evils. So, to do what is best for the common good, we just need to determine which is the lesser evil. So which is worse? The violence from trying to keep something illegal? Or the social costs of decriminalizing something that is already causing a lot of harm while being illegal? It comes down to what you, as an individual, think. And that is, must be, a subjective decision. And therein lays the problem of choosing what is best for the common good. It’s an opinion. Choices aren’t right or wrong. There’re just different opinions.
And that’s why so few can agree on what is best for the common good. Different people think different things are better. And different things are worse. And, at best, they can agree to disagree.
Tags: addicted to drugs, adult beverages, affects of alcohol, agree to disagree, AIDS, Al Capone, alcohol, America's southern border, anti-drug program, apparatchiks, apparatchiks of the state, Big Government, Big Government, binge drinking, bootlegger gangs, bootleggers, broken homes, change human behavior, Chris Farley, common good, coyote ugly, crack/meth whore, damned if you do damned if you dont, decriminalize drugs, do as I say not as I do, drink in moderation, drink to excess, drinking problems, drive-by shootings, drug addiction, drug du jour, drug gangs, drug money, drug trade, drunken husbands, enlightened laws, entry drug, Gangsta Paradise, gangster paradise, gangsters, getting high, heavy drinking, heroin/cocaine cocktail, high society, human behavior, illegal drugs, illegal liquor trade, immigrants, intoxicating beverages, John Belushi, just say no, ladies of high society, lesser of evils, marijuana, Nancy Reagan, peer pressure, poorer elements of society, power of the state, Progressives, Prohibition, prostitutes, saloon, sex, social costs, social elites, social engineering, speedball, syphilis, temperance, temperance movement, the poor, war on drugs