FT153: “The two things you need to pass liberal policies are uninformed people and heightened emotions.” —Old Pithy

Posted by PITHOCRATES - January 18th, 2013

Fundamental Truth

The Girls in the “In” Crowd focus on their Appearance and try to be the Kind of Girl the Boys in the “In” Crowd Want

After puberty the attractive people start noticing each other.  Boys become jocks and get physically fit.  Girls start dieting and develop eating disorders.  The jocks tend to come from more well-to-do families because it’s expensive to participate in sports.  So not only are the jocks physically attractive to the girls they also have the nicer stuff.  The attractive girls try to date the good looking boys with the nicer stuff.  And they do.  When these attractive people get together they form the “In” crowd.

I’m in with the “In” crowd
I go where the “In” crowd goes
I’m in with the “In” crowd
And I know what the “In” crowd knows

The “In” crowd attends the best parties.  They wear the finest clothes.  They have the latest toys.  Everyone wants to be part of the “In” crowd.  But most only see it from the outside.  For they aren’t attractive enough or rich enough to be in with the “In” crowd.

We breeze up and down the street
We get respect from the people we meet
They make way day or night
They know the “In” crowd is out of sight

The girls in the “In” crowd focus on their appearance.  And try to be the kind of girl the boys in the “In” crowd want.  The blonde stereotype.  Young and dumb.  And beautiful.  If they please these rich boys they get jewelry, clothes, recreational drugs and great nights out at the best parties at the best clubs.  And all they have to do is look beautiful.  And put out.  To hook up with these rich boys and give them what they want.  Sex with beautiful girls.  Which they readily give up thanks to birth control.  And when that fails, abortion.

I’m in with the “In” crowd
I know ev’ry latest dance
When you’re in with the “In” crowd
It’s easy to find romance

Being in the “In” crowd is where it’s at.  That small clique in school everyone wants to be a part of.  The nerds and the geeks.  The poor.  The overweight.  The short.  Those with horrible acne.  The losers.  They all look at the beautiful people in the “In” crowd and dream of being asked to join them.  But they never will.  So life goes on for them.  These losers.  Some work on their grades and go on to college.  Become doctors, chemists, engineers, etc.  Others get a factory job.  Learn a skilled trade.  Go into journalism.  Or politics.

Once in with the “In” Crowd you become Part of the Upper Class and Live like Royalty and are Treated like Royalty

The rich guys in the “In” crowd like their women young and dumb.  In fact, a lot of the people in the “In” crowd make fun of the smart kids in school.  Calling them chumps for learning stuff.  Some of the “In” crowd go on to great success in sports, music, movies and television.  Some go on to great success for nothing more than being part of the “In” crowd.  Such as Paris Hilton.  And Kim Kardashian.  But a lot of girls who were in with the “In” crowd lose the affections of the boys they once had.  As other young and pretty girls displace them.  Even marry these rich guys.  With nothing but their looks to go on some end up dancing in strip bars.  And when their youth fades some enter prostitution.  Or collect government benefits.  Because instead of hitting the books when they were in high school they went to the best parties.  And travelled with the “In” crowd.

Some of those who did hit the books in high school learned some things.  Some useful things.  Things that helped them get into college.  But they primarily learned how to be Democrat voters.  Because public education is controlled by the teacher unions.  And their Democrat friends in government.  When they go on to college their liberal college professors pull them even further left.  They learn to not like or trust capitalism.  And to love government unconditionally.  When they get their degrees some go into journalism with a liberal bias.  Some become elected politicians.  Liberal Democrats.  Where they have a lot of money pass through their hands.  Which gives them a lot of power.  And what does money and power give you?  Access to the best parties.  Where you can actually meet and rub shoulders with the stars of sports, music, movies and television.  Yes, these losers from high school finally get to travel with the “In” crowd.

And once in they never want to leave.  Because it is great being in with the “In” crowd.  You become part of the upper class.  You live like royalty.  And are treated like royalty.  Because of all that power you hold.  So they want to protect their elevated status.  By protecting their government jobs.  And creating more government jobs.  As many as possible.  So there is always some place for them to go in case their ungrateful constituents vote them out of office.  And these ungrateful constituents are a problem.  Because they believe in limited government.  Low taxes.  Little government spending.  Fewer regulations.  The very things that are anathema to those who have entered the “In” crowd via big liberal government.

A Serious Crisis gets People Emotional and makes them willing to do things they weren’t willing to do Before

American kids are getting their behinds handed to them by Indian and Chinese kids.  Who are blowing them away on test scores.  Why?  Because of the liberal control of public education.  Instead of being introduced to differential calculus in high school American kids are learning multicultural things.  Instead of learning about Adam Smith and laissez faire economics they’re learning about America’s original sin.  Slavery.  Even though the American economy took off in the free North.  Which is why the North defeated the South in the American Civil War.  But they teach our kids that we stole the land from the Native Americans and got rich by exploiting African slaves.  Because of the evils of capitalism.  And the profit incentive.  Which steals from everybody.  And exploits everyone.  This is what they teach our kids.  Instead of math and science.

Of course, dumbing down the curriculum has a very positive side affect.  For liberals.  The less these kids know the easier it is to lie to them.  Making it easier to turn them into good Democrat voters.  Who keep voting for liberal candidates.  And their liberal policies.  Which keeps expanding the size of government.  And the amount of government spending.  Which they pay for by increasing the taxes on those who can afford to pay more.  And they add layer upon layer of new regulations on businesses.  Enforced by a growing number of bureaucrats.  Creating ever more jobs in the federal government.  To help level the playing field.  To help the little guy.  And to punish those who have too much wealth.  Because it is the fair thing to do.  The just thing.  Especially in a country with so many wrongs to right.

But eventually these kids grow up.  Get jobs.  And raise families.  They become moderates.  Even conservatives.  Who tend to vote against the liberal agenda.  Which is why the Left can’t rely on just dumbing down people.  Because dumb can wear off.  So they have to tug on people’s heartstrings.  Get people’s emotions working for them.  And nothing does that better than milking a crisis.  For as Rahm Emanuel said, “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste.”  Because a serious crisis gets people emotional.  Makes them willing to do things they weren’t willing to do before.  Like the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary.  Twenty dead children really made people emotional.  And the Left hopes emotional enough to get these people to support something that they normally wouldn’t support.  Gun control.  Which the Left is hell-bent on passing.  Just as they were hell-bent on passing Obamacare.  Despite the masses opposing it.  Just as they oppose gun control.  But they were able to tug enough at people’s heartstrings to pass Obamacare into law.  Just as they hope to pass gun control into law.  For when it comes to passing an unpopular liberal agenda nothing helps more than uninformed people and heightened emotions.  And the more of that liberal agenda they pass the more the government grows.  Creating more jobs in an expanding federal government.  Giving these politicians more money.  And more power.  Getting them into the best parties.  Where they meet and rub shoulders with the stars of sports, music, movies and television.  Letting these one-time high school losers continue to be in with “In” crowd.

(The “In” Crowd by Billy Page performed by Bryan Ferry.)

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Rich Doctors say Tax Them More to Help Fund the Canadian ‘Obamacare’ System that Makes them Rich

Posted by PITHOCRATES - March 25th, 2012

Week in Review

People distrust rich people.  That’s why they want to tax them more.  Because they have more than enough money.  No matter what they say about earning their money or how they invest their wealth to create jobs.  People don’t want to hear any of this.  For they ‘know’ that these rich fat cats are lying just to keep from having to ‘share’ their wealth.  But whenever a rich guy says ‘tax us rich people more’ everyone hangs on to their every last word.  For if they are talking about raising taxes on the rich then these are not your typical rich.  They’re the good kind.  Like these doctors in Canada (see Tax us more, doctors urge (Are the lawyers listening?) by Michael Babad posted 3/22/2012 on The Globe and Mail).

A group of doctors is taking a page from Warren Buffett’s tax-the-rich call, urging the Canadian and Ontario governments to tax higher-income earners more…

Doctors for Fair Taxation plan to announce their scheme in Toronto this afternoon, calling for additional taxes on people earning more than $100,000. You’d be hit with an additional 1 per cent if you earn between $100,000 and $170,000, 2 per cent if you earn up to $640,000, and 3 per cent for up to $1.85-million. Above that it would be 6 per cent.

“We feel that this is a moral argument,” Dr. Michael Rachlis, who founded the group that so far boasts more than 50 physicians, told The Canadian Press.

“We cannot talk about throwing people out of work and cutting needed programs for people,” said Dr. Rachlis, an associate professor at the University of Toronto.

Wow.  Sounds very selfless, doesn’t it?  These rich guys asking to be taxed more to help their country?  At least on the surface it does.  But the question that begs to be asked is what are they spending so much money on that they have to raise taxes?  And when you learn what that is it puts these doctors into a different light.

Here’s an article from 2010.  About two years ago.  Talking about a budget crisis.  Where spending is out of control.  Spending that the Canadians just can’t sustain.  And where is this out of control spending?  Why, it just happens to be in the industry that pays these doctors.  Canada’s single-payer health care system.  Talk about coincidences.  These doctors asking rich people everywhere to help pay the nation’s bills.  Where the biggest bill is the one that pays these doctors (see Soaring costs force Canada to reassess health model by Claire Sibonney posted 3/31/2010 on Reuters).

Pressured by an aging population and the need to rein in budget deficits, Canada’s provinces are taking tough measures to curb healthcare costs, a trend that could erode the principles of the popular state-funded system.

Ontario, Canada’s most populous province, kicked off a fierce battle with drug companies and pharmacies when it said earlier this year it would halve generic drug prices and eliminate “incentive fees” to generic drug manufacturers.

British Columbia is replacing block grants to hospitals with fee-for-procedure payments and Quebec has a new flat health tax and a proposal for payments on each medical visit — an idea that critics say is an illegal user fee.

And a few provinces are also experimenting with private funding for procedures such as hip, knee and cataract surgery.

It’s likely just a start as the provinces, responsible for delivering healthcare, cope with the demands of a retiring baby-boom generation. Official figures show that senior citizens will make up 25 percent of the population by 2036.

Proponents of national health care in America blame the private health insurers, the pharmaceuticals and the hospitals for out of control health care costs.  What they say we need is a system like Canada.  Where they put people before profits.  And yet here they are.  The Canadians.  With a health care system suffering from out of control costs.  Which they are trying to fix with higher taxes.  Additional fees.  Even a little Americanization (that is, privatization).  Makes you wonder why we’re going forward with Obamacare while the Canadians are finding that type of a system is unsustainable.  Especially when our retiring baby boomers outnumber their retiring baby boomers. 

Canada, fretting over budget strains, wants to prune its system, while the United States, worrying about an army of uninsured, aims to create a state-backed safety net.

Healthcare in Canada is delivered through a publicly funded system, which covers all “medically necessary” hospital and physician care and curbs the role of private medicine. It ate up about 40 percent of provincial budgets, or some C$183 billion ($174 billion) last year.

Spending has been rising 6 percent a year under a deal that added C$41.3 billion of federal funding over 10 years.

But that deal ends in 2013, and the federal government is unlikely to be as generous in future, especially for one-off projects.

Wow.  Look at that.  Almost half of provincial budgets pay for the ‘free’ health care of Canadians.  Which is causing budget deficits at the provincial level.  And at the national level.  Well, up until 2013, that is.  When the national government is going to address their budget deficits by cutting their health care payments to the provinces.  Increasing the provincial budget deficits in the process.  Leaving the provincial governments to tax and spend more.  Or ration care and cut spending more.  Including doctor pay.  Could this have anything to do with those selfless physicians asking that their government tax the rich more?  Perhaps.

Brian Golden, a professor at University of Toronto’s Rotman School of Business, said provinces are weighing new sources of funding, including “means-testing” and moving toward evidence-based and pay-for-performance models.

“Why are we paying more or the same for cataract surgery when it costs substantially less today than it did 10 years ago? There’s going to be a finer look at what we’re paying for and, more importantly, what we’re getting for it,” he said.

Other problems include trying to control independently set salaries for top hospital executives and doctors and rein in spiraling costs for new medical technologies and drugs.

Ontario says healthcare could eat up 70 percent of its budget in 12 years, if all these costs are left unchecked…

The province has introduced legislation that ties hospital chief executive pay with the quality of patient care and says it wants to put more physicians on salary to save money.

In a report released last week, TD Bank said Ontario should consider other proposals to help cut costs, including scaling back drug coverage for affluent seniors and paying doctors according to quality and efficiency of care.

So the power of government inserted into the health care system has done nothing to lower the cost of medical procedures in Canada.  Makes you scratch your head, doesn’t it?  Because the proponents of Obamacare say that’s exactly what the power of government can do.  But in practice it has failed to do what these theorists say it can do.  Cut costs.  Through bureaucratic management.  And ‘turning of the screws’ on the medical device and drug manufacturers.  Despite this very practice NOT working in Canada.  Which means that the proponents of Obamacare think the Canadian bureaucrats simply aren’t smart enough to make their health care system work efficiently.  That the system of government-managed health care is a flawed system when it comes to costs and efficiency.  Or that government-managed health care is not about costs or efficiency.  But about the bureaucracy itself.  The control and power it offers the politicians.  And the votes it can buy them.

“Many of the advances in healthcare and life expectancy are due to the pharmaceutical industry so we should never demonize them,” said U of T’s Golden. “We need to ensure that they maintain a profitable business but our ability to make it very very profitable is constrained right now.”

Scotia Capital’s Webb said one cost-saving idea may be to make patients aware of how much it costs each time they visit a healthcare professional. “(The public) will use the services more wisely if they know how much it’s costing,” she said.

Wait a minute.  To fix the government-managed system they need to make the patients aware of the costs so they can choose wisely?  There’s a name for such a system.  We call it capitalism.  The very thing missing from government-managed health care.  And the very reason why government-managed systems (the Canadian health care system, the American Medicare/Medicaid programs, the UK’s National Health Service, etc.) fail to control costs.  And why Obamacare will fail to control costs.  Because they exclude the one thing that controls costs best from government-managed systems.  Capitalism.  Where people make spending decisions based on cost.  Which will never happen when someone other than the patient pays for the costs for the medical services a patient receives.  For no one ever asks ‘how much’ when they’re not paying the bill.

So when a rich doctor says to tax the rich more is this selfless?  Or selfish?  You decide.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,