Children only care about the Here and Now and Instant Gratification
“Mom, can I eat this whole birthday cake?” “No.” “Dad, can I stay up past my bed time?” “No.” “Mom, can I go out and play instead of cleaning my room?” “No.” “Dad, can I skip my homework and play football with the guys?” “No.” “Mom, can I go to the concert with Billy and his big brother?” “No.” “Dad, can I use your table saw?” “No.” “Mom, will you buy me this micro dress for the dance?” “No.” “Dad, can I borrow the car this Friday to drive to a party?” “No.” “Mom, can I have boys in my bedroom?” “Hell no.” “Dad, can I have $50?” “For what?” “Stuff?” “What kind of stuff?” “You know, stuff.” “Oh, in that case, no.”
“No.” It is the most important word in a parent’s vocabulary. For kids want to do a lot of things that aren’t good for them. Things that will get them into trouble. Things that might hurt them. Things that may leave them with unpleasant and/or long-lasting consequences. Parents have to say ‘no’ because kids just don’t know any better. They only think about the here and now. Not about the future. They want instant gratification. They want to have fun. They don’t want to wait. They don’t want to work. And the last thing they want to do is to delay gratification.
So parents have to keep saying ‘no’ for their children’s own good. At least, responsible parents do. Because parents are older and wiser than their children. Contrary to popular belief children have about their parents. Children like to say that their parents “don’t know anything.” But they do. In fact, they know a lot. Because they were once impulsive children having the same arguments with their parents. And now that they are parents they see the world differently than they did as children. They see it as their parents saw it. And realize that their parents were right all along. Thanks to a lot more education, a lot more work experience and a lot more life experience. The things that makes one wiser as one gets older.
Children who never Grow Up as Adults tend to Remain Liberal and Vote Democrat
Children that grow up into responsible adults tend to be more conservative. They get jobs. Straight out of high school. Or after college. And party less. They cut back on reckless behavior. Such as drinking and driving. Because they realized they could get a DUI. They could hurt themselves. Or, worse, hurt someone else. If they used drugs they cut back. Some stop using them completely. They stop having casual sex with random people. In part to avoid an STD. In part because they want something more than just a good time. So they, instead, get married. And settle down. Raise a family. And it’s about this time that these one-time wild liberals start voting Republican. As they see there is a lot more to life than partying with booze and drugs. And having sex. Especially when they become parents.
Becoming a parent changes a person. Single coworkers may still want to go out and get a drink after work. They may look forward to the weekend so they can drink themselves into a stupor. But not a married person. At least, not a married responsible grownup. They want to go straight home to their wife. Or husband. They want to spend time with their kids. And they don’t want to do anything that could harm their kids. Like risking their job by coming in late hung over after a night of excessive drinking. They’d rather get to work early. Do their job. And build a successful career. That is both personally satisfying. And takes care of their family. Something sobriety helps. And our days tend to be easier when they don’t start with a hangover.
Children who never grow up as adults, on the other hand, tend to remain liberal. Focused on the here and now. Without a thought about the future. For them gratification is all that matters. These people tend to keep the wild ways of their youth. And those who go on to college take it up a notch. Away from their parents incessant ‘no’s they can finally say ‘yes’ to everything. And a lot of them do. They’ll get drunk and video things with their smartphones. And upload them to the Internet. The kind of things you once had to go to a pornography store to buy. But they and their friends will post these videos for all the world to see. And these things will still be floating around the Internet years later when they’re saying ‘no’ to their own children. Or interviewing for a job. Jessie Watters on The O’Reilly Factor has interviewed some of these young college students on spring break. Asking them questions about history. International events. Current events at home. And if they could identify members of the Federal government. Few could. Very few. Because they have more pressing things in their lives apparently than getting an education. At least based on what they’re doing with their smartphones.
Democrats only care about the Here and Now and Instant Gratification
Liberal Democrats love these kids. For they know all they want is to have fun. So they become the party of fun. Free birth control. Access to abortion. Decriminalizing marijuana. Anti-religion. No moral absolutes. Anything goes. Even encouraging reckless behavior (they’re going to have sex anyway so we might as well make it easier for them). Veritable anti-parents. Who tell these kids that they (these kids) know what’s best for them. Not their parents. And if they want instant gratification that’s okay. You don’t have to worry about the future because if you vote Democrat that’s something else we’ll do for you besides the birth control, abortion, marijuana and the lack of moral constraints. If you vote Democrat we’ll take care of you from cradle to grave. Just like that The Life of Julia slideshow promised. With so little education, work experience and life experience these kids don’t know any better and say, “Okay. Where do I vote.”
So the Democrats use these kids to stay in office. They know little so it is easy to lie to them. About the ‘evil Republicans’ that are as big a killjoy as their parents. And about how much better the Democrats are going to make their lives. If only they keep voting Democrat. So they do. Because the Democrats offer everything an irresponsible adult could want. Which is a shame as a lot of what the Democrats offer is bad for the rest of us. And the country. Their Keynesian economics fails over and over yet they keep using these failed policies of the past. Putting the country further into debt. And further depreciating the dollar. They lie to these kids about global warming. Allowing the Democrats to remain in power and pass crippling regulations. Threatening the coal industry. As well as increasing our energy costs. They want to raise the minimum wage for unskilled, entry-level jobs. Reducing the number of entry level jobs available for those looking to enter the workforce. And they want to take over our health care. The best health care system in the world. Replacing it with something not as good and more costly.
But these grand domestic plans require a lot of money. Which they often get from gutting the defense budget. Weakening our military (something they never liked to begin with) to free up money for buying votes (i.e., spending) elsewhere. They help justify this with a horrible foreign policy. Instead of peace through (costly) strength they choose a ‘please like us’ foreign policy. Marginalizing American Exceptionalism. Being kind to our enemies. And leaving our allies doubting our commitments. But if our enemies like us we won’t need a large military anymore. Allowing them to use those defense dollars elsewhere. And how has that been working out? Not good. Since the ‘please like us’ foreign policy juggernaut Egypt is in chaos. Syria is in a bitter civil war. Iran is developing a nuclear bomb. Israel is feeling abandoned. Al Qaeda is taking over Libya and Iraq. The Taliban will return to Afghanistan once the U.S. leaves. North Korea is test-firing ballistic missiles. And Vladimir Putin is restoring the Soviet Union. Because he can. Thanks to America’s new ‘please like us’ foreign policy. Instead of the peace through strength of previous presidents. Like Ronald Reagan. And JFK.
There’s something else children who never grow up do. Go into politics. Into the Democrat Party. Not the Republican Party. The party the Democrats derisively call the party of ‘no’. They join the Democrat Party. And do all of the things that give us the worst economic recovery since that following the Great Depression. And a more dangerous world. Despite this they still want to do more. Without caring what their actions may do to our future. Just like children. All they care about is the here and now. And instant gratification. So of course the Republicans are the party of ‘no’ because that’s what grownups say to children. ‘No’.
Tags: abortion, adults, birth control, children, conservative, cradle to grave, Democrat, Democrat Party, drinking, education, foreign policy, future, grownup, here and now, instant gratification, kids, liberal, liberal Democrat, life experience, marijuana, older and wiser, parent, party, party of no, peace through strength, please like us, Republicans, vote Democrat, work experience
Christians believe in the Reward of Hard Work and Shun Idleness for it tends to Invite Trouble
Liberals are very confident people. As well as arrogant. Narcissistic. And condescending. Which is why they are so secular. Wanting to take the separation of church and state argument to the extreme. Attacking and mocking Christianity every chance they get. As they don’t like anyone judging them. Or setting some moral standard. For liberals are a sinful people.
The Seven Deadly Sins are wrath, greed, sloth, pride, lust, envy, and gluttony. Christians try to avoid these. They forgive their enemies instead of getting angry at them. They tithe to their church instead of keeping all of their money greedily for themselves. They believe in the reward of hard work and shun idleness for it tends to invite trouble. They are humble and don’t strive for attention. They have strong self-control and make sacrifices for a better future instead of giving in to current wants and desires. They tend to be happy with what they have however modest their lives may be. Instead of being envious of others. They don’t eat, drink or live to excess, preferring to do everything in moderation. Things you just don’t associate with liberals.
Now think of some liberals you know of. Think of the vicious things liberal Democrats say about Republicans (such as a campaign commercial showing a Republican pushing ‘Grandma’ off a cliff). The vulgar things some liberal commentators say about Republican women. And the ridicule of conservatives on late-night television. Rich liberals who want to raise taxes on the rich (which includes the middle class) to pay for a generous welfare state while giving little to charity themselves. As they are far more generous with other people’s money than with their own. And never risk their own money in risky investments such as Solyndra. Preferring to risk the taxpayers’ money.
Liberals attack the Rich because they are Envious of their Hard Work and Success
Liberals always want a bigger federal government with an ever-growing bureaucracy. So they can be career politicians without ever getting a real job where they have to work hard to earn a living. Liberals like to brag about how smart they are and how brilliant their legislation is. Taking credit for things they didn’t even do. Such as President Obama taking credit for the surge in natural gas production done on private land by private companies. Or boasting how their economic policies are working even though the real unemployment rate is in excess of 13% (when you count those who have left the labor force and those who can only find a part-time job). And their refusal to admit they wrote a terrible law. Such as Obamacare.
Liberals never want to wait for anything. They don’t believe in hard work. They believe in early retirement and generous pensions. For their friends in the union. Like the UAW. In the public sector unions. And those in government jobs. They attack the rich because they resent their hard work and success. Are envious of them. And want to punish them because they were never as good as they are. With higher tax rates. And punishing regulations. Hollywood celebrities and the Washington elite live the most extravagant lives. In some of the most expensive homes which are filled with the finest food, drink and toys. And when that’s not enough some further their excess with drugs.
These are things you just don’t associate with Christians. In fact, these are things Christians frown upon. Even telling their congregation not to live lives like these in their church services. For these are not Christian lives. Some people could have everything they could possibly want or desire but are still not happy. Or are bored because it came too easily. Or too soon. Turning to other outlets to excite them. Alcohol and drugs. Drag-racing in expensive sports cars on neighborhood streets. Partying all night in the hottest clubs. Or blowing a lot of money gambling. Anything to escape the boredom of an idle life.
For a Better Life we should Shun Liberalism and Embrace Free Market Capitalism
This is why liberals attack Christianity so much. As well as one other reason. Because they don’t like believing in a higher being. For they are so arrogant and narcissistic that they can’t stand the thought of some being that is greater than themselves. For they hold liberalism sacred. And if anyone worships anything they want the people to worship them. Because they believe they are the smartest and the most insightful people in the universe. Yes, vanity, thy name is liberalism. Which is why they believe they should control government. And our lives. Because they’re smarter and wiser than business owners. Bankers. Entrepreneurs. And market forces. For they are the higher being. Not what those silly Christians worship.
A lot of people have felt like this throughout history. Adolf Hitler. Mao Zedong. Saddam Hussein. Benito Mussolini. Muammar Gaddafi. Kim Il-sung. Kim Jong-il. Kim Jong-un. Fidel Castro. Supreme leaders and ruthless dictators who preferred their people to worship them like a god. And imposed socialism, fascism or communism on their people. Using their supreme intelligence and insight to make the state a better place for the people. Making the state supreme. While subordinating the individual. And elevating the supreme leader above everyone. Something liberals have been trying to do all their lives. Only without the torture and genocide.
But their efforts share a similar trend with these ruthless dictators. The quality of life declines under their rule. Some of the worst places to live when it comes to human rights have been in Nazi Germany, the People’s Republic of China, Iraq, Fascist Italy, Libya, North Korea and Cuba. While some of the best countries to live in are the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia and Hong Kong. All once part of the Christian British Empire. An empire that embraced free market capitalism. And when people practice self-control and make sacrifices for the future engage in free market capitalism they make a better place to live. At least this is what history has shown us. So if we want a better life we should shun liberalism. And embrace free market capitalism. For liberty, thy name is capitalism.
Tags: arrogant, capitalism, Christianity, Christians, conservatives, Democrats, dictators, drugs, envious, excess, free market, free-market capitalism, hard work, higher being, human rights, idle life, liberalism, liberals, liberty, narcissistic, Republicans, sacrifice, self-control, sin, vanity
The Democrat Party is the Cool Uncle that buys Booze and Cigarettes for his Nieces and Nephews
People characterize the Republicans as being a bunch of old fogies. Out of touch. Who don’t have a clue about the world today. Unlike their children
do. Who are wise beyond their years. For they know there is nothing really bad with underage drinking and smoking. Smoking marijuana. Or doing other drugs. And there is nothing wrong with casual sex. Sexting. Or nude selfies.
This is why the children of old fogies like the Democrat Party. Because the Democrats get them. Unlike their parents. Their parents tell them they shouldn’t stay out late, drink, smoke, do drugs or have sex. While the Democrats decriminalize marijuana and work to decriminalize other drugs. Provide free birth control. And abortion without parental notification. Making the Democrat Party the cool uncle that buys booze and cigarettes for his nieces and nephews. So is it any wonder that the youth vote goes Democrat?
The ironic thing, though, is that these old fogies were once young themselves. And some were pretty wild in their youth, too. But once they became parents things changed. For when it’s their daughter they don’t want her being objectified. Encouraged to explore her sexuality by having so much casual sex that she catches a sexually transmitted disease or gets pregnant. Especially if they did in their youth. Which is the last thing they want for their little girl. Who is and will forever remain their little girl.
Keynesian Economics conditioned People to accept that Government knows Best
This is the rule. Not the exception. As kids grow up fighting their parents they reach a point in life where they realize that their parents were right all along. That if they had only spent more time on their homework and less time partying things would have turned out better. Life may have been less fun in the short-run but much better in the long-run. They’d had an earlier start in their career. A career with better pay and benefits. They could have bought a house sooner. Met someone to marry and start a family with sooner. Instead of finding themselves at 25 buried under student loan debt for a degree that can’t get them a job. And a decade or so of hooking up having conditioned men to shun any serious commitment. Leading their daughters to turn to serial dating and online dating. As they struggle to find someone else who has grown up, too.
This is what the old fogies know. That their kids don’t. You get wiser with age. Thanks to education. And experience. Two things the young just don’t have. And never will. Because by the time they grow wise from education and experience they are no longer kids. But well on their way to ‘old fogery’. Which is, of course, a problem for the Democrat Party. For a wise voting public will not help them win elections. As their Keynesian economic policies have nothing but a long record of failure. Giving us the Great Depression, the stagflation of the 1970s, the dot-com recession and the Great Recession. To name a few bad economic times Keynesian economics have given us. Things older people know from education and experience. But the kids voting Democrat don’t.
Keynesian economics ushered in the era of Big Government. And did something the Socialists could not. Conditioned people to accept that government knows best. Especially young people. Uneducated and inexperienced young people. Despite the Democrats’ horrible record concerning things economic. Because of this record the Democrats use lies and deceit to attack free market capitalism. That economic system that worked better than any other. To get people who knew no better to mistrust free market capitalism. And ask for the government to fetter unfettered capitalism. To make the world a fairer place.
The Democrats use Public Education to teach our Kids to Distrust Capitalism and to Trust Government
It sounds good to the inexperienced and uneducated. Because it feels good to think in terms of fairness. And if there is one thing the young have are emotions. They like to use their hearts. Not their brains. As they are idealistic and naïve. Unlike those old fogies who are realists. They can’t be fooled or swayed by the Democrat lies because they have learned and experienced a lot in their long lives. And heard the same old Democrat lies all through those long lives. Which is why the Democrats work so hard on the youth vote. The War on Women, their lax drug attitudes, birth control, abortion, gay rights…all of these are to get the young to think in terms of fairness. To tug on their heartstrings. To get them emotional. And keep them emotional. As well as ignorant.
The more ignorant people are the easier it is to lie to them. Anyone who knows the history of Western Civilization will understand how life became better for people as we moved closer to free market capitalism. Anyone who knows classical economics will understand how thrift, savings, free trade, sound money, etc., made America the number one economy in the world. While the Keynesian policies of today are threatening to knock America out of that number one spot. People who understand these things are not going to vote Democrat. Which is why the Democrats work hard to keep people from learning these things. By constantly lying about them. And not teaching them in the institutions they control. Our public schools. And our institutions of higher education.
The Republican equation for winning votes is a difficult equation. Knowledge + Experience + Reason = Republican Votes. It’s difficult because the Democrats have long controlled public education. Thanks to their friends in the teacher unions. And their friends running our institutions of higher education. Which spend more time teaching our kids to distrust capitalism. And to trust government. To feel more. And think less. To live for today. And not worry about tomorrow. Making it very difficult for the Republicans to get young voters to vote for them. As they are unknowledgeable (thanks to our public schools), inexperienced (because they are young) and prefer emotion over reason (because feeling is more fun than thinking). Which is why old fogies (the knowledgeable, experienced and thinking) vote Republican and the youth vote does not.
Tags: abortion, birth control, capitalism, casual sex, deceit, Democrat, Democrat Party, Democrats, distrust capitalism, drugs, education, emotions, experience, free market, free-market capitalism, government knows best, higher education, ignorant, Keynesian, Keynesian economic, lies, marijuana, old fogies, parents, public schools, Republican, Republicans, trust government, young people, youth vote
(Originally published May 21st, 2013)
The DJIA and the Labor Force Participation Rate tell us how both Wall Street and Main Street are Doing
Rich people don’t need jobs. They can make money with money. Investing in the stock market. When you see the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) increasing you know rich people are getting richer. Whereas the middle class, the working people, aren’t getting rich. But they may be building a retirement nest egg. Which is good. So they benefit, too, from a rising DJIA. But that’s for later. What they need now is a job. Unlike rich people. The middle class typically lives from paycheck to paycheck. So more important to them is a growing job market. Not so much a growing stock market. For the middle class needs a day job to be able to invest in the stock market. Whereas rich people don’t. For a rich person’s money works enough for the both of them.
So the Dow Jones Industrial Average shows how well rich people are doing. And how well the working class’ retirement nest eggs are growing for their retirement. But it doesn’t really show how well the middle class is living. For they need a job to pay their bills. To put food on their tables. And to raise their families. So the DJIA doesn’t necessarily show how well the middle class is doing. But there is an economic indicator that does. The labor force participation rate. Which shows the percentage of people who could be working that are working. So if the labor force participation rate (LFPR) is increasing it means more people looking for a job can find a job. Allowing more people to be able to pay their bills, put food on their tables and raise their families.
These two economic indicators (the DJIA and the LFPR) can give us an idea of how both Wall Street and Main Street are doing. Ideally you’d want to see both increasing. A rising DJIA shows businesses are growing. Allowing Wall Street to profit from rising stock prices. While those growing businesses create jobs for Main Street. If we look at these economic indicators over time we can even see which ‘street’ an administration’s policies favor. Interestingly, it’s not the one you would think based on the political rhetoric.
Wall Street grew 75% Richer under Clinton than it did under Reagan while Main Street grew 65% Poorer
Those going through our public schools and universities are taught that capitalism is unfair. Corporations are evil. And government is good. The Democrats favor a growing welfare state. Funded by a highly progressive tax code. That taxes rich people at higher tax rates. While Republicans favor a limited government. A minimum of government spending and regulation. And lower tax rates. Therefore the Republicans are for rich people and evil corporations. While the Democrats are for the working man. Our schools and universities teach our kids this. The mainstream media reinforces this view. As does Hollywood, television and the music industry. But one thing doesn’t. The historical record (see Civilian Labor Force Participation Rate and Recessions 1950-Present and Dow Jones Industrial Average Index: Historical Data).
The Democrats hated Ronald Reagan. Because he believed in classical economics. Which is what made this country great. Before Keynesian economics came along in the early 20th Century. And ushered in the era of Big Government. Reagan reversed a lot of the damage the Keynesians caused. He tamed inflation. Cut taxes. Reduced regulation. And made a business-friendly environment. Where the government intervened little into the private sector economy. And during his 8 years in office we see that BOTH Wall Street (the Dow Jones Industrial Average) and Main Street (the labor force participation rate) did well. Contrary to everything the left says. The DJIA increased about 129%. And the LFPR increased about 3.4%. Indicating a huge increase of jobs for the working class. Showing that it wasn’t only the rich doing well under Reaganomics. The policies of his successor, though, changed that. As Wall Street did better under Bill Clinton than Main Street.
Despite the Democrats being for the working man and Bill Clinton’s numerous statements about going back to work to help the middle class (especially during his impeachment) Wall Street clearly did better than Main Street under Bill Clinton. During his 8 years in office the LFPR increased 1.2%. While the DJIA increased 226%. Which means Wall Street grew 75% richer under Clinton than it did under Reagan. While Main Street grew 65% poorer under Clinton than it did under Reagan. Which means the gap between the rich and the middle class grew greater under Clinton than it did under Reagan. Clearly showing that Reagan’s policies favored the Middle Class more than Clinton’s policies did. And that Clinton’s policies favored Wall Street more than Regan’s did. Which is the complete opposite of the Democrat narrative. But it gets worse.
The Historical Record shows the Rich do Better under Democrats and the Middle Class does Better under Republicans
The great economy of the Nineties the Democrats love to talk about was nothing more than a bubble. A bubble of irrational exuberance. As investors borrowed boatloads of cheap money thanks to artificially low interest rates. And poured it into dot-com companies that had nothing to sell. After these dot-coms spent that start-up capital they had no revenue to replace it. And went belly-up in droves. Giving George W. Bush a nasty recession at the beginning of his presidency. Compounded by the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
The LFPR fell throughout Bush’s first term as all those dot-com jobs went away in the dot-com crash. Made worse by the 9/11 attacks. As all the malinvestments of the Clinton presidency were wrung out of the economy things started to get better. The LFPR leveled off and the DJIA began to rise. But then the specter of Bill Clinton cast another pall over the Bush presidency. Clinton’s Policy Statement on Discrimination in Lending forced lenders to lower their lending standards to qualify more of the unqualified. Which they did under fear of the full force and fury of the federal government. Using the subprime mortgage to put the unqualified into homes they couldn’t afford. This policy also pressured Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to buy these toxic subprime mortgages from these lenders. Freeing them up to make more toxic loans. This house of cards came crashing down at the end of the Bush presidency. Which is why the DJIA fell 19.4%. And the LFPR fell 2.1%. Even though the economy tanked thanks to those artificially low interest rates that brought on the subprime mortgage crisis and Great Recession both Wall Street and Main Street took this rocky ride together. They fell together in his first term. Rose then fell together in his second term. Something that didn’t happen in the Obama presidency.
During the Obama presidency Wall Street has done better over time. Just as Main Street has done worse over time. This despite hearing nothing about how President Obama cares for the middle class. When it is clear he doesn’t. As his policies have clearly benefited rich people. Wall Street. While Main Street suffers the worst economic recovery since that following the Great Depression. So far during his presidency the LFPR has fallen 3.7%. While the DJIA has risen by 86%. Creating one of the largest gaps between the rich and the middle class. This despite President Obama being the champion of the middle class. Which he isn’t. In fact, one should always be suspect about anyone claiming to be the champion of the middle class. As the middle class always suffers more than the rich when these people come to power. Just look at Venezuela under Hugo Chaves. Where the rich got richer. And the middle class today can’t find any toilet paper to buy. This is what the historical record tells us. The rich do better under Democrats. And the middle class does better under Republicans. Despite what our schools and universities teach our kids. Or what they say in movies and television.
Tags: Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, bubble, Bush, Clinton, corporations, Democrats, DJIA, dot.com, Dow Jones Industrial Average, economic indicator, Great Recession, interest rates, jobs, Keynesian, labor force participation rate, LFPR, Main Street, middle class, Reagan, Republicans, rich people, Ronald Reagan, stock market, subprime mortgage, tax rates, Wall Street, working class, working man, working people
Week in Review
People who work in government were once called civil servants. Because they worked for us. Or, in today’s parlance, they were our bitch. But over time our government workers no longer wanted to be called civil servants. As they grew to feel to be our superiors. Part of a privileged class. Or, in today’s parlance, we became their bitch. And if you don’t believe it just compare our earnings to theirs (see Now, most members of Congress are millionaires by Emily Heil posted 1/9/2014 on The Washington Post).
It’s official — Congress is a millionaires’ club. For the first time ever, most members of Congress are worth at least a cool million…
Also worth noting: the analysis shows Rep. Darrell Issa (with a $464 million fortune) is triumphantly back at the top of the list of wealthiest members, a spot the California Republican and car-alarm mogul had enjoyed for years, before being bumped by Rep. Mike McCaul (R-Texas).
So most members of Congress (i.e., our civil servants) are millionaires. But note how they make it sound like all of these fat-cat politicians are Republicans. Building on the stereotype that Republicans are for rich people. While Democrats are for the working man. However if you follow the link in this Washington Post (a paper that leans left) article you’ll come to this chart.
My, how about that? Democrats have a higher median net worth than Republicans. And Democrats got even richer than Republicans in 2012. And yet they say the Republicans are the party of the rich? Clearly that isn’t the case. The Democrats are the party of the rich. For they are richer than Republicans in Congress. Despite the richest guy in Congress being a Republican. Who, it should be noted, made his money in the private sector. Not like so many others who go to Congress poor. And leave millionaires.
Tags: civil servants, Congress, Democrats, government workers, median net worth, millionaires, Republicans
Week in Review
The left keeps saying that the Republicans have a war on women. Because they are a bunch of Christian extremist who want to take away birth control and abortion from women. They take every opportunity to attack Christianity as the great oppressor of women. Warning women of the hell they’ll be subjected to if we elect Republicans with their Christian agenda. But they will never say anything about the oppression of women under Islam. Which is very real (see Afghan woman flown to Turkey after husband ‘slices off her nose’ by Rob Crilly, Islamabad, and Zubair Babakarkhail posted 12/18/2013 on The Telegraph).
An Afghan woman has been flown to Turkey for emergency surgery after her husband sliced off her nose and lips apparently in punishment for refusing to sell her jewellery.
Sitara, 30, was found lying unconscious in her home on Friday when neighbours in Herat province were alerted by the cries of her four children.
The attack has been seized on by women’s rights campaigners as evidence that not enough is being done to protect fragile progress made since the Taliban was ousted from power in 2001…
Her mother Naseema said he was addicted to heroin and had regularly beaten her daughter in the past for failing to give birth to a son. On Friday evening she said he asked her daughter – who was engaged at the age of 11 – for money and then demanded her gold ring when she said she had no cash.
“She told him that this ring was given to her by her father – Azim did not buy it for her,” she said.
He turned violent, knocking the mother-of-four unconscious with a rock collected from outside before taking a knife to her nose and top lip, said Naseema. It was all witnessed by her four young daughters, aged three to 12…
A United Nations paper published earlier this month showed reported violence against women was on the rise – an increase of 28% in the past year.
In November, officials floated the idea of reintroducing stoning for the adultery before quickly withdrawing it amid an international outcry.
If anyone has a war on women it’s Islam. Some will say these are isolated incidences and don’t represent the true Islamic faith. But these isolated incidences far outnumber the zero number of Christians cutting off women’s noses and lips. Or stoning women for adultery. But you never hear the left who is supposedly fighting for women in the war on women express the same level of outrage over these abuses of Islam that they reserve for Christians. All they do is help Islam attack Christianity. Making Islam’s power greater. Putting more women at risk for these horrible abuses.
Will Democrats ever put their politics aside to protect women from real dangers? Or will they continue to exploit women for their politics? And create phantom dangers where none exist? As they will sacrifice anything for their insatiable quest for power?
Women are oppressed by Islam and they remain silent. Calling Christianity the real danger. Which is more tolerant of birth control, abortion (and homosexuality) than Islam is by far. But they attack Christianity. And not Islam. Because the enemy of my enemy is my friend. Even though this ‘friend’ will oppress them in a heartbeat if given the chance. For Democrats may like Islam because they annoy Christians but Muslims hate everything liberals stand for. And would prefer to eradicate them like all enemies of Islam.
Tags: abortion, adultery, Afghan woman, birth control, Christianity, Democrats, Islam, Republicans, stoning, stoning women for adultery, Taliban, violence against women, war on women
Week in Review
The establishment Republicans are getting sick and tired of conservatives. Their base. And they’re starting to speak out against them in harsher tones they rarely if ever use on Democrats (see Why The GOP Civil War Just Exploded Out Into The Open — Again by Brett LoGiurato posted 12/12/2013 on Business Insider).
On Dec. 12, House Speaker John Boehner finally conveyed the bewildered sentiment that so many Republicans shared as far back as August.
Speaking at a press conference where he said outside conservative groups have “lost all credibility,” Boehner referenced comments that Heritage Action CEO Michael Needham made toward the end of October’s federal government shutdown — one that Boehner suggested Republicans were pushed into by the “defund Obamacare”-happy outside conservative groups.
“Everybody understands that we will not be able to repeal this law until 2017,” Needham had told Fox News — as in, repeal isn’t possible until a Republican is in the White House. To Boehner, that was a tacit admission that these groups knew their strategy was unworkable.
Well, that’s the problem the conservatives have with the establishment Republicans, isn’t it? Winning the White House. Which they haven’t been able to do with the last two establishment Republican candidates. Both who proudly proclaimed that they could reach across the aisle and work with Democrats. Which basically meant that they would help the Democrats pass their liberal agenda. By NOT trying to advance a conservative agenda. What 40% of the electorate wants.
Being that about 40% of the electorate is conservative these Democrat-lite candidates didn’t rally the Republican base. The 21% of the electorate that is liberal were never going to vote for a Republican. And the moderates in the middle who lean Democrat vote for the real Democrat candidate. Not the Democrat-lite candidate. Always.
This is why the conservatives in Congress are a bit exasperated with the establishment Republicans. Because they lose the election that matters. By NOT running a conservative candidate. And they never push back on the liberal agenda as they are so afraid that the media will say bad things about them. Or liberals won’t like them. It’s either that or the establishment Republicans, like liberals, want big government. Because they, too, like the money and the power. And don’t want any of that limited government nonsense. That thing our Founding Fathers gave us.
When was the last time that the Republicans won by a landslide? That’s right. When they ran a conservative candidate. Ronald Reagan. Another conservative the Republican establishment didn’t like.
Tags: Boehner, conservatives, Democrat-lite, Democrats, establishment Republicans, liberal, Liberal Agenda, Republicans, White House
Week in Review
A large part in Mitt Romney’s loss to President Obama in the 2012 presidential election was the Republicans’ so-called war on women. All started by that question from George Stephanopoulos. If Mitt Romney wanted to take women’s birth control away. Completely out of the blue. Something never included in any Republican platform.
But from that question the mantra on the left was if you elect conservatives they will take away a woman’s birth control and her access to abortion. Which, according to the left, is the only thing women care about. Using their vaginas. And with this emphasis on vaginas women are going to great lengths to make their vaginas as pretty as possible (see British gynaecologists express shock over five-fold rise in female genital cosmetic surgery cases by Agence France-Presse posted 11/16/2013 on South China Morning Post).
British gynaecologists warned yesterday that increasing numbers of teenage girls and women are undergoing genital cosmetic surgery, driven in part by unrealistic images of how they should look based on pornography.
You can’t blame pornography on conservatives. That’s something the left says is a free speech issue. The objectification and exploitation of women. Liberals say that there is nothing wrong with women being sexy. And fight any attempts to censor television. Or the movies. What harm can come from consenting adults enjoying a women’s nudity? Or enjoying her sexual objectification? Well, as it turns out, it’s not just men using pornography as the standard for women. Women are, too. Even teenage girls.
Yet it’s conservatives who have a war on women. Go figure.
Tags: birth control, Democrats, genital cosmetic surgery, Mitt Romney, pornography, Republicans, vaginas, war on women
Week in Review
Sex sells. And women sell sex. Apparently (see Women Hate Sexually Explicit Ads, Unless They’re Selling Something Expensive by Katy Waldman posted 12/5/2013 on Slate).
According to researchers led by the University of Minnesota’s Kathleen Vohs, women find erotically charged ads less distasteful when they promote very expensive items. We like our objectification classed up, thank you…
The researchers explain their findings by way of sexual economics theory, which treats the heterosexual dating pool as a marketplace and sex as a commodity. The story goes that since women sell sex to men in exchange for resources—including hard-to-quantify ones like attention—they want the world to perceive their eroticized bodies as “rare and precious.” Ads that link female sexuality to exclusive, high-value goods help; ads that equate a woman’s erotic charms to a cheapo Casio timepiece obviously do not. “Using sexual images to promote an inexpensive product fosters undesirable associations between sex and cheapness, commonness, or low value, which is antithetical to women’s preferences about how sex should be understood,” the authors write.
There was an episode of Scrubs where Carla and Eliot (best gal pals) were talking about sex. The conversation veered into a night of sex between Carla and her husband. Eliot said something like, “You didn’t do that, did you?” And Carla replied, “Of course not. I’m saving that for something nice. Like a tennis bracelet.” Of course, the that they were talking about was anal sex. Something a lot of men want. But not their ladies. Unless they can get something real nice in exchange, that is. Like a tennis bracelet.
Apparently life imitates art. Women do sell sex. As long as it’s for something really nice. Something as rare and precious as their sexual goods. Perhaps this why Ted Night’s wife was so offended when Rodney Dangerfield said, “You’re a lot of woman, you know that? Yeah, wanna make 14 dollars the hard way?” in Caddyshack. Perhaps if he had offered to buy her a villa in Tuscany she would have been flattered.
Maybe this is why the Democrats are such advocates of free birth control and access to abortion. For the economics of it. For a lady being with child must discount her sexual goods in the left’s eyes. Making them less ‘rare and precious’ as, say, a lingerie model. How the left like their women. Based on how they’ve sexualized them (all that birth control and abortion helps keep them barren and sexual). And an inconvenient/untimely pregnancy could be the difference between a cheapo Casio timepiece and a luxurious 18 carat gold Cartier chronometer. The kind of gift rich men buy their lingerie model girlfriends who are young enough to be their daughters. Which is the price these old men must pay to enjoy their sexual goods.
Of course this begs the question if their sexual goods are so ‘rare and precious’ why do they give then away so much that they need birth control and abortion? The whole concept of ‘hooking up’ makes a woman’s sexual goods anything but rare. If it’s a smorgasbord for men out there that makes these sexual goods cheapo Casio timepieces. For when they meet at a party on campus no one is giving a woman a luxurious 18 carat gold Cartier chronometer for a roll on some stranger’s unmade bed. Actually, it’s the monogamous married woman who has the rare and precious goods. Because only one person has access to them. Making them the ultimate ‘must have’ that no one can. What some misogynist and hedonistic men prize above all others. Bedding the elusive married women. The ultimate forbidden fruit. A prim and proper lady.
This is what the left prefers. Less lady-like behavior and more overt sexuality. Casual sex with multiple partners. Reducing women to their sexual goods. While Republicans prefer marriage and monogamy. And yet it’s the Republicans that have a war on women. Go figure.
Tags: abortion, birth control, Democrats, Republicans, sex sells, sexual goods, women, women sell sex
1950s Society did not Depict their Women Sexually
Democrats bemoan that the Republicans want to take America back to the 1950s. Where women didn’t work. But stayed at home and raised families. Where they ware barefoot and pregnant. With three jobs in the household. A cook in the kitchen. A maid in the house. And a whore in the bedroom. Always serving the needs of others. But never themselves. While their husbands go out and build a career. And enjoy life. Leaving their wives behind to suffer from the disease of pregnancy over and over again. And the oppression of motherhood.
Of course the Republicans don’t quite see it that way. They don’t see pregnancy as a disease. Or raising a family as oppression. They see a loving household as a good thing. Where they can raise their children to be good citizens. To respect one another. And to treat women like ladies. To respect them. And protect their dignity. To be chivalrous. To hold a door for them. To offer their seat to them on a crowded bus. To think of them as human beings. And not just as vessels holding their sexual parts. Sexual objects that are only useful when a man wants to have a good time.
Democrats disparage those old television shows like Father Knows Best, The Donna Reed Show, Leave it to Beaver, Ozzie and Harriet, etc. Because they treated their women horribly. There was no hooking up or casual sex at all. For 1950s society did not depict their women sexually. They dressed and acted conservatively. No bare midriffs, lower back tattoos, plunging necklines or exposed thongs for men to leer at. Men were polite to women. And boys were polite to girls. Unless they had cooties. Even then if they were mean parents, teachers and older siblings admonished them for that. Oh yeah, it was sheer hell for women back then.
Democrats have Liberated Women to be Pure Sex Objects for Men everywhere to Enjoy
Then came the Sixties. And the Sexual Revolution. The counterculture (i.e., young Democrats) railed against treating women with respect. For they have vaginas. And they should use them as often as they darn well pleased. Not to just get married and raise a family. To one man for the rest of their life. The heck with that. They should use their sexual parts to please more than just one man. So instead of only one man enjoying her vagina a woman should allow many men to enjoy her vagina. It was the dawn of the women’s movement. Feminism. And never again would American society treat women like prim and proper ladies. At least not with feminists around.
As the conservatives tried to maintain a lady’s honor the young liberal Democrats fought censorship. For the right to show naked women with their legs spread in pornographic magazines. To show them fully naked in the movies. In simulated sex acts. And performing real sex acts in hardcore pornographic movies. Yes, Democrats have finally liberated women to be pure sex objects for men everywhere to enjoy. Of course Democrats called this liberating. While dirty old (and young) men just say, “Thank you!”
Seedy strip clubs became high-scale gentlemen’s clubs. Where women stripped down to a thong and rubbed herself on a man’s lap. Or did more in the VIP/champagne rooms. Yes, this was liberating for women. Sexy women were everywhere. Half-naked women sold things on television. Boys could peak at naked women spreading their legs in magazines at the local drug store. Most R-rated movies contained gratuitous nude scenes. And when the VCR came out pornography really took off. Women became slabs of meat on camera. Making hundreds of titles. Putting a lot of miles on their vaginas. And other openings.
Democrats are doing everything within their Power to Nationalize a Woman’s Vagina
So who do the kings of the sexual exploitation of women vote for? These businesses all vote Democrat. Because they don’t want to roll time back to the 1950s when women weren’t sexual objects. For they profit handsomely on the liberation of women. While bombarding men with their pornographic images. So that when they see a woman today they’re not thinking about what she’s thinking. They’re thinking about what she looks like naked. And how much they would like to do things with her that they do in those pornographic films. Sometimes forcing the issue with alcohol and drugs. Bringing terms like ‘date-rape’ and ‘roofie’ into the lexicon. For the American left has so sexualized women that more and more men can think of nothing else but hooking up.
The Democrats have long championed birth control and abortion. To remove any consequences from a sexually active lifestyle. Encouraging women to offer their vaginas to as many men as possible. Which they have. Kicking off an epidemic of sexually transmitted diseases. And not because women’s husbands were seeing prostitutes at the local saloon like they were before Prohibition. Bringing diseases home to their wives. Which helped kick off the Prohibition movement as men drank away their paychecks and did bad things. Like being abusive to their wives and giving them syphilis and other STDs. No. Today women are out there hooking up for casual sex. Bringing STDs into their lives. Because Democrats have taught them all their lives that they should be having casual sex. Instead of getting married. Because that would be a living hell.
Perhaps the greatest political trick ever done was how Democrats got women to choose to be sexual objects. Getting them to believe that casual sex with many different partners is liberating. And not objectifying. The next greatest political trick ever done was how these same Democrats convinced women that it’s the Republicans that have a war on women. Not the Democrats. Who are doing everything within their power to nationalize a woman’s vagina. So feminist men (who are mostly Democrat) can enjoy a lady’s charms without having to marry her. Like they did in the God-awful 1950s. Where Republican men kept their women barefoot and pregnant. Well, if Republicans want women barefoot and pregnant then Democrats want women with their legs spread and their wombs barren. Yet it’s the Republicans who have a war on women. Go figure.
Tags: 1950s, barefoot and pregnant, casual sex, conservative, Democrats, feminist, hooking up, liberation of women, men, pornographic, pregnancy, Republicans, sex objects, sexual revolution, vagina, war on women, women, women's movement
« Previous Entries