Week in Review
I remember learning long ago that there were two Italys. A prosperous north. And an impoverished welfare state in the south. Apparently that was and still is true (see Venice votes to split from Italy as 89% of the city’s residents opt to form a new independent state by Hannah Roberts posted 3/21/2014 the Mail Online).
Venetians have voted overwhelmingly for their own sovereign state in a ‘referendum’ on independence from Italy…
The floating city has only been part of Italy for 150 years. The 1000 year–old democratic Serenissima Repubblica di Venezia, was quashed by Napoleon and was subsumed into Italy in 1866.
Wealthy Venetians, under mounting financial pressure in the economic crisis, have rallied in their thousands, after growing tired of supporting Italy’s poor and crime ridden Mezzogiorno south, through high taxation…
Campaigners say that the Rome government receives around 71 billion euros each year in tax from Venice – some 21 billion euros less than it gets back in investment and services.
The five-day poll came in the same week that Crimean residents chose in a landslide vote to leave Ukraine and become part of Russia.
Crimea is no Venice. Venice was one of the great Italian city-states that rose after the fall of the Western Roman Empire. They were an economic powerhouse. Trade made Venice the richest city in Europe. Their navies dominated the Mediterranean. And they helped usher in the Renaissance. Venice was an independent republic for 850 years longer than they were part of Italy. So Venice has some esteemed history. And they know a thing or two about economic activity. Such as income redistribution does not work.
If you keep taxing the economic producers more and more eventually they’re going to do something about it. Such as moving their economy underground. Out of reach of the greedy hands of the taxman. Or they may just vote to secede. That vote may not be constitutional. But apparently that doesn’t matter these days. At least it didn’t matter in Crimea. But one thing for sure. Based on the flow of money between Venice and Rome it is fair to say that Rome needs Venice more than Venice needs Rome.
Tags: high taxation, independence, Italy, Republic, secede, Venice
Liberals pack the Judiciary with Liberal Judges to Write Law they can’t Write in Congress
Harry Reid and the Democrats went nuclear today. Changing the Senate rules for the first time since the Founding. To increase the power of those in the majority. So they can run roughshod over those in the minority. Thanks to the poor launch of Obamacare. And the sinking realization that because the Democrats have so angered the people in the process of implementing the Affordable Care Act (the president and Democrats lied and people are losing their health insurance and doctors) that Democrats up for election in 2014 are going to be thrown out with extreme prejudice. Turning the Senate over to the Republicans. Hence the need to go nuclear now.
It’s no secret the left legislates from the bench. Using judges to write legislation that Congress won’t. Such as making abortion legal via Roe v. Wade. That was a law made not by the law-makers. The legislature. Congress. But by liberal judges on the bench. Who are to interpret law. Not write it. But in Roe v. Wade, as in so many other laws that came to be that Congress refused to write, judges wrote law in their legal rulings. Allowing the liberal minority to make their will the law of the land.
America is a center-right country. Which means there are more conservatives than liberals. In fact, only about 21% of the people identify themselves as liberal while about 40% of the people identify themselves as conservative (see Conservatives Remain the Largest Ideological Group in U.S. by Lydia Saad posted 1/12/2012 on Gallup). Yet this 21% has implemented a lot of their liberal agenda. How? Liberal judges. The key to changing the country against the will of the people. When you can’t get the people’s representatives to write your laws you turn to the judiciary. Which is why Harry Reid went nuclear today. So they can pack the judiciary with liberal judges. Before they lose the Senate. So they will be able to write law from the bench that they won’t be able to do after they lose the Senate.
The Filibuster is the Last Line of Defense for the Minority
The filibuster is a stalling tactic. A tool the minority can use to prevent the majority from running roughshod over them. To protect minority rights. For majority rule can be dangerous. The majority could write law that restricts the rights of the minority. Don’t like the internal combustion engine? Well, the majority could write legislation for a costly carbon tax. Of course, the Democrats don’t have a majority in the House. But they do have one in the Senate. Which confirms the president’s judicial appointments. So if the president stacks the courts with liberal judges the left can get their carbon tax. By writing regulations for a carbon tax instead of legislation. And having the courts make that regulation law. With the left saying that they had that right under their environmental regulatory powers. And if you don’t like that sue us.
This is why the left wants to stack the courts with liberals. Who may or may not be actual judges. For they don’t want judges to interpret law. They want them to write law that Congress won’t. If the right sues the government for exceeding their constitutional authority and the case ends up in a court packed with liberal judges the right will lose. And the unconstitutional regulation will become law. Despite the Republican-controlled House.
The right has been holding up some exceptionally liberal Obama appointees to the bench. Frustrating the left. Because they can’t move their liberal agenda through the Republican held House of Representatives. While their plan B—stacking the courts—was being blocked by the Republicans because the Democrats did not have 60 Senators in the Senate. For if they did they could invoke cloture. End debate. And force a vote. Which they would, of course, win. Making the filibuster the last line of defense for the minority. For if the judicial appointment only appeals to the 21% of the population the minority can filibuster until they withdraw the appointment. And appoint someone that doesn’t appeal ONLY to 21% of the population.
When the Democrats were in the Minority they said Opposition to the Republicans was Patriotic
Back when the Republicans held the Senate during the George W. Bush administration the Democrats were holding up Bush appointees. The Republicans broached the subject of the nuclear option. And the left attacked Republicans. Calling it a power grab. An affront to the Founding Fathers. The worst thing that could happen to our republic. Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and other Democrats spoke on the record opposing the nuclear option. But that was then. This is now. After the rollout of Obamacare. And the very likely possibility that the Democrats will lose control of the Senate in 2014. Now Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, et al are all for the nuclear option.
Because the Republicans are so partisan the left had no choice. They simply wouldn’t rubber-stamp the liberal agenda. So they had no choice but to grab power. To run roughshod over those in the minority in Congress. So the minority in the nation can impose their rule on the majority. When the Democrats were in the minority in Congress they said opposition to the Republicans was patriotic. That it made the republic healthier. Locking the Congress into gridlock because they couldn’t get their way was fulfilling the vision of the Founding Fathers. By preventing one-party rule.
But all that changes when they are in the majority. And those in the 21% are fine with it. Those in the mainstream media. Hollywood. Late-night television. Even the audiences of the late-night television shows. Who are all for debate when they are out of power. But are fine with one-party rule when they are in power. Because they believe that their side is the only side that matters. Which is decidedly NOT what the Founding Fathers envisioned. The left believes everyone should think like they think. And if they don’t there should be laws to compel people to act like they (the left) think they should act. Even if it requires violating the Constitution. Like Obamacare forces people to buy something against their will for the first time in the history of the republic. But expecting people to pay for their own birth control instead of forcing others to pay for it? Why, that’s an affront to the Founding Fathers. Making any law-violating power grab acceptable. As long as it’s the left doing the law-violating and the power-grabbing. For the left believe the end justifies the means. Just like the Nazis did. The communists. And other tyrannical regimes have throughout time.
Tags: Barack Obama, Congress, conservatives, courts, Democrats, filibuster, Founding, Founding Fathers, Harry Reid, Hillary Clinton, judges, judiciary, legislate from the bench, legislature, Liberal Agenda, liberal judges, liberals, majority, minority, Nancy Pelosi, nuclear, nuclear option, Obamacare, one-party rule, power grab, regulations, Republic, Republicans, Senate, Senate rules
Week in Review
The Founding Fathers gave us a republic because they feared democracy. Or mob rule. In a republic you elect responsible people to represent you in government. In a democracy it’s majority rule of the people. Often when they are agitated or angered about something. Which can trample on minority rights. If the mob is angry over a group of immigrants working for a lower wage the mob can vote a ban on those immigrants. Round them up. And send them home. Or imprison them. This is the danger of a true democracy. Anything the majority agrees on can become law. Which is why the Founding Fathers gave us a republic. And prayed that only wise men who shared their Enlightenment views would enter government.
Another danger of a true democracy is that once the people understand that they can vote themselves the treasury they will. While responsible representatives won’t. Until people start looking at government as a way to get rich. And become professional politicians. Instead of the part-time representatives the Founding Fathers envisioned. Which transformed the republic into a democracy. Only it’s our representatives that have descended into mob rule. As professional politicians buy votes by giving the people generous government benefits that the state will soon be unable to afford. Which is what is happening in France now (see French president booed at WWI ceremony posted 11/11/2013 on the Associated Press).
France’s unpopular president ignored jeers by protesters as he laid flowers at the tomb of the unknown soldier during a ceremony marking the end of World War I…
Shouts of “Hollande resign!” rang out and some demonstrators wore the red caps that have come to symbolize an anti-tax movement that has caused violent protests in Brittany in recent weeks…
Hollande’s popularity has sunk to record lows amid growing dissatisfaction over weak economic growth, high taxes and rising joblessness.
The French people voted the socialist into office because they wanted more free stuff. Or wanted not to lose the free stuff they already had. Courtesy of their social democracy. Which promised cradle-to-the-grave government benefits. But declining birthrates led to a falling population growth rate all over Europe. Such that the number of people receiving those government benefits is growing while the number of people paying for those benefits is not. French president Nicolas Sarkozy tried to be responsible. While socialist presidential challenger François Hollande (the guy the French now hate) said the problem was that they weren’t taxing the rich enough. And the other usual socialist claptrap. Well, the socialist won. He raised taxes. The economy tanked as expected. And now the French people hate him.
This is exactly what the Founding Fathers feared about democracy. The French republic devolved into mob rule. And tried to vote themselves the treasury. Which leads to only higher taxes. Or cut benefits as the state can no longer afford to pay for these benefits. Which is where the French are now. And the Americans will soon be.
Tags: democracy, Founding Fathers, Francois Hollande, government benefits, Hollande, Mob rule, professional politicians, Republic, socialist, true democracy, vote themselves the treasury
Hamilton knew that a Republican Government needed Men of Virtue for it to Survive
Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus left his plough to defend the Roman Republic. Became dictator. Defeated the enemy. Resigned the dictatorship. And returned to his plough. The epitome of a republican ruler. Voluntarily giving up absolute power to preserve the republic. America had its own Cincinnatus. George Washington. Lucius Sergius Catilina (Catiline) was basically the anti-Cincinnatus. Whereas Cincinnatus was honorable, virtuous, principled and selfless Catiline was not. Where Cincinnatus tried to save the Roman Republic Catiline tried to overthrow it. America had its own Catiline. Aaron Burr.
Burr was an unprincipled opportunist. While George Washington approached politics by asking what was best for the country Aaron Burr asked what was best for Aaron Burr. Washington loathed politics and tried to stay above it. Whereas for Burr politics were the only good thing about governing. Burr entered politics at the birth of political parties in the US. As the tensions were building up between Hamilton’s Federalists and Jefferson’s Republicans. Burr started out as a Federalist. But chafed in a subordinate role to Hamilton. The titular head of the Federalist Party. So he left the Federalist Party and became a Republican. He accepted an appointment from Republican New York governor George Clinton as attorney general. New York had two Federalist senators in Congress. And Hamilton wanted to keep those seats Federalist. He tried to appeal to Burr’s principles to get him to return to the Federalist Party. But Burr had no principles. And when Governor Clinton backed him for Senator he stayed Republican. And won one of those seats.
Being Senator was nice but Burr wanted to be governor of New York. He tried to make a deal with the Federalists. He knew they wanted to get rid of Republican Governor Clinton and replace him with a Federalist governor. He wanted to be that Federalist governor. But Hamilton was a lot like Washington. He had principles. And put the country first. Hamilton knew that a republican government needed men of virtue for it to survive. And Burr had no virtue. So he was not interested in making any deals with Burr.
Alexander Hamilton called Aaron Burr the American Catiline
In the election of 1800 Thomas Jefferson needed New York. And Burr had connections. So Jefferson asked for his help. And he delivered. By changing the New York electors from Federalist to Republican. Jefferson then added Burr to the Republican ticket in the 1800 election. At that time the president was the candidate who won the most votes. And the vice president was the candidate who won the second most votes. Burr and Jefferson tied. Instead of conceding the election to Jefferson (the whole point in enlisting Burr’s help was to get Jefferson elected president) he forced the House of Representatives to vote 36 times until the tie was finally broken. Thus alienating Burr from Jefferson forever. Knowing that Jefferson would drop him from the Republican ticket in the 1804 election he began talking to New York Federalists again. Who wanted Burr to run for New York governor. And he was more than willing to switch parties again as he was completely unprincipled and offered himself to the party that made it most worth his while. It was at this time that Hamilton called Burr the American Catiline.
Also at this time there was a Federalist plot in New England. Should Jefferson win reelection in 1804 there were plans for New England to secede from the union. With Burr’s help New York would secede and join in a northern confederacy. Hamilton knew of the plot. And desperately wanted to stop it. For it was the last thing he wanted was for the American union to dissolve. He turned up his public attacks on Burr. Which helped Burr lose the election in New York. Attacks that Burr took exception to. Challenging him to a duel to restore his honor besmirched by Hamilton’s attacks. So on July11, 1804, Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton crossed the Hudson River to Weehawken, New Jersey. And exchanged pistol shots at 10 paces. Hamilton reportedly fired his shot harmlessly past Burr. Not wishing to hurt him while at the same time exposing himself to danger so as not to besmirch his honor. Burr’s shot, though, found Hamilton. He died the following day. Burr won the duel. But he lost his reputation and his political future.
Burr then headed west. Where he had planned to set himself up in an independent nation formed by parts of Mexico, Louisiana and Texas. He may have tried to get Great Britain involved. And he may have had plans of going to war with Spain. The details are a little sketchy. But he was up to something. When President Jefferson learned of his activities he had Burr arrested and indicted for treason. He was acquitted of treason at his trial. But the trial destroyed whatever was left of his political career after killing Hamilton.
If Aaron Burr were Alive Today he would likely endorse the Democrat Candidates Barack Obama and Joe Biden
If Burr were alive today he would be in awe of what the federal government became. Back in his days there were few federal jobs available. But today? He could live the life he always wanted. And he wouldn’t even have to win an election. All he would need to do is use his political connections to obtain a position in the federal bureaucracy. A post for life. And with an ever expanding federal government there would always be a post for life somewhere in that magnificent bureaucracy. Where politics ruled. Not principles. Where government spending soars regardless of the consequences. And class warfare creates a new aristocracy. Not the top 10% earners who pay 70% of federal income taxes. Or the bottom 50% who pay no federal income taxes. No, the new aristocracy is the federal bureaucracy that sits on top of this great wealth transfer. Like the nobility of old. Only without the need of having a good last name.
Had Burr lived today he would have looked at the federal government and cried out, “Where have you been all my life?” He would support anyone furthering this massive government expansion. Especially those practitioners of class warfare. The Democrat Party. If Aaron Burr were alive today he would likely endorse the Democrat candidates Barack Obama and Joe Biden.
Tags: 1800 election, 2012 election, 2012 Endorsements, Aaron Burr, Alexander Hamilton, American Catiline, aristocracy, bureaucracy, Burr, Catiline, Cincinnatus, class warfare, election of 1800, federal bureaucracy, federal government, Federalist Party, Federalists, George Washington, Governor Clinton, Hamilton, Jefferson, New York, politics, Republic, Republicans, Roman Republic, Thomas Jefferson, Washington
The Founding Fathers put Responsible, Enlightened and Disinterested People between the People and their Government
The Founding Fathers were no fans of democracy. Election by popular vote was little more than mob rule. It would lead to the tyranny of the majority over the minority. And as Benjamin Franklin warned, once the people learned they could vote themselves money from the treasury, they would.
These feelings extended to the states as well. The small states did not want to be ruled by the large states. This is why every state had two senators in the Senate. To offset the influence of the big states in the House of Representatives. Where the people voted for their representatives by direct popular vote. And to offset the influence of the new federal government, the state legislatures would elect their senators. Giving the states a large say in federal affairs.
Knowing history as they did, this was all very purposeful. Indirect elections. Putting other people between the people and the power of government. And the treasury. The people would vote for responsible, enlightened and disinterested people to represent them. Then these responsible, enlightened and disinterested people would make policy. And by doing this the Founding Fathers hoped that the new republic would survive.
The Founding Fathers set up the United States as a Federation of Independent States
Blacks make up about 12% of the population. Gay and lesbians less than 1.5%. In a true democracy it would not be difficult for the majority to win a popular vote to make these people illegal. As crazy as that sounds a democracy could do that. If that was the way the mob felt at the time of the vote. This was the kind of thing the small states worried about. As well as the Founding Fathers. A tyranny of the majority. Where anything goes. As long as the majority says so.
Interestingly, a popular vote could have freed the slaves. Which was a concern of the southern states. The Three-Fifth Compromise was yet another provision the Founding Fathers included in the Constitution. To get the southern states to join the new union. This counted 3/5 of a slave as a person to determine representation in the House of Representatives. Which would offset the numerical superiority of free people in the northern states. And prevent them from ruling the southern states. Which is pretty much what happened after the Civil War. As the freed slaves tended to vote along with their northern liberators.
The Founding Fathers set up the United States as a federation of independent states. For before there was a United States of America there were independent states loosely associated together. Coming together only when they needed each other such as winning their independence from Great Britain. Even during the Revolution the states were still fiercely independent. And getting these fiercely independent states to join together in a more perfect union required a lot of checks and balances. A separation of powers. And indirect elections. Which the Founding Fathers dutifully included in the new Constitution. It wasn’t perfect. But it was the best such a diverse group of people and beliefs could produce.
The Seventeenth Amendment Destroyed a very Large Check on Federal Power
Of course, this leaves the presidential election. And the Electoral College. Which grew out of the same concerns. Of trying to prevent the large states from ruling the small states. The Electoral College blended together the popular vote of the House of Representatives. And the indirect vote of the Senate.
Each state had electors who actually voted for the president. The number of electors in each state equaled that state’s representation in Congress. The number of representatives in the House (population-based). And the number of senators (state-based). The electors typically cast all of their electoral votes based on the outcome of the popular vote of their state. Which is why sometimes presidents win elections even though they lose the national popular vote. An outcome designed by the Founding Fathers. To prevent a tyranny of the majority from ruling over the minority.
Some things have changed since the Founding. We extended the right to vote to black men. And then later to women. Both good things. But not all changes were good. Such as the Seventeenth Amendment. Perhaps the biggest change from the intent of the Founding Fathers. Ratified in 1913, it changed the election of Senators from a vote by the state’s legislature to a popular vote like that for the House. Destroying a very large check on federal power. Creating a much more powerful central government by transferring power form the states to the federal government. What the Founding Fathers tried to prevent in the original Constitution. With their checks and balances. Their separation of powers. And their indirect elections. Including the Electoral College. Which, if eliminated, would give even more power to the federal government. And a greater ability for the majority to rule unchecked over the minority.
Tags: checks and balances, Constitution, democracy, direct popular vote, disinterested, election, electoral, Electoral College, electors, enlightened, federal government, federation of independent states, Founding Fathers, House of Representatives, indirect elections, large states, majority, Mob rule, popular vote, president, presidential election, Republic, responsible, Senate, Senators, separation of powers, small states, state legislatures, the Electoral College, treasury, tyranny of the majority, United States, vote
The Founding Fathers Purposely made it Difficult for the New Federal Government to Spend Money
Benjamin Franklin knew. He knew what would happen once the people learned they held the keys to the treasury. “When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.” All the Founding Fathers knew this. This is why they created a representative government. They put other people between the people and the treasury. A lot of people. Responsible people. People who knew better. Or should know better.
It started with the separation of powers. The country needed a leader. But they didn’t want a king. They wanted a leader with limited powers. So they limited the president’s access to money. The Founding Fathers gave the power of the purse to the House of Representatives. The president could only spend the money Congress allowed the president to spend. The president could veto spending. But Congress could override this veto by a two-thirds majority in both the House and the Senate. So the president can try to stop spending. But he simply can’t spend at will.
But neither can the House. Because the Senate has to approve any spending initiated by the House. Before it can even get to the president. The Founding Fathers purposely made it difficult for the new federal government to spend money. To limit the power and breadth of the federal government. By limiting its money. Even after the president signs it into law. Should any questionable spending pass both houses, and the president approves it, we can still challenge it. By the third branch of government. The judiciary. Which further checks the power of federal government. On the rare occasion when the federal government passes bad legislation.
As Originally Written in the Constitution the States’ Legislatures Voted for a States’ Senators
Back at the Founding the states were very powerful. They were nation-states. Joined together only by a loose and weak confederation. And very suspect of any distant, centralized power. Whether it be a king on the far side of the Atlantic. Or a president on the near side. To get the new Constitution ratified the Founding Fathers knew they had to appease the states’ concerns. And they did that with the Senate. The states’ house.
As they originally wrote the Constitution, we elected the members of the House of Representatives by popular vote. But not the Senate. The states’ legislatures voted for their states’ senators. These state legislators who we elect by popular vote in their states. This put even more people between the people and the treasury. And gave the states a way to rein in a federal government that strayed too far from their Constitutional boundaries.
But that all changed with the Seventeenth Amendment (1913). At the dawn of big, progressive government. When great amounts of power transferred from the states. To the growing federal government. And the spending began. The states’ legislatures no longer voted for states’ senators. The people now voted for their senators. By direct popular vote. And got closer to the national treasury.
Growing Spending and a Declining Population Growth Rate required Higher Tax Rates and Class Warfare
The federal government grew as we removed these other people from between the people and the treasury. Responsible people. People who knew better. Or should know better. Now people were closer to the federal treasury. And they slowly learned what Benjamin Franklin feared. They learned that they could vote themselves money. And did.
Responsible, limited government went out the window. Pandering for votes was in. Rugged individualism was descendant. And the nanny state was ascendant. Federal government spending grew. Federal taxes grew. And federal debt grew. Because you won elections by giving people stuff. Paid for with other people’s money. Which was key. You didn’t win elections by raising people’s taxes. You won them by raising other people’s taxes. And the way you do that is with class warfare.
In the beginning class warfare was easy. Because the federal budget was a lot smaller than it is today. So you didn’t need very high tax rates. And the population base was growing. A lot of families had closer to 10 children than the 2.3 children of today. So having lots and lots of new taxpayers in subsequent generations would produce a steady and growing stream of federal tax revenue. But as spending grew and the population growth rate declined, that caused revenue problems. Requiring higher and higher tax rates. And more and more bitter class warfare.
The General Trend of Defining ‘Rich’ Downward has Redefined the Middle Class as ‘Rich’
With the higher spending and falling revenue budget crises followed. Which ramped up the class warfare. Pitting the ‘rich’ against the poor and the middle class. Of course they kept redefining ‘rich’ as they needed to raise more and more tax revenue. First calling the superrich fat-cat industrialists and Wall Street bankers ‘rich’. The billionaires. Then they included the millionaires. But when they could no longer pay for the growing cost of the federal government people earning less and less were lumped in with these super rich. Until today it’s someone making as little as $250,000 a year.
Anyone who says these people should pay their fair share should understand the general trend of defining ‘rich’ downward. And that line that defined ‘rich’ has moved a long way down. Closer and closer to the middle class. Like those earning $250,000. Many of these people aren’t rich. Not by a long shot. Despite earning $250,000. They’re small business owners. People who risk everything to run a restaurant. Or start a construction business. The number one and number two type of business that fails. Because they can’t cover their bills. And grow their businesses. Despite having business income of $250,000.
The problem isn’t that the rich aren’t paying their fair share of taxes. It’s that the government is spending too much. In their eternal quest to buy votes. By granting more and more government largess to the poor and middle class. Courtesy of the rich. Who will soon be anyone with a job. Because of that growing federal spending. And a declining birthrate.
Today’s Benefits are Paid by the Rich and Future Generations
As Benjamin Franklin feared this spending is threatening the health of his republic. And governments around the world. Because people learned that they could vote themselves money. And politicians were only too glad to oblige. Promising ever more. In exchange for votes. By providing ever more generous and growing government benefits. Confident that they didn’t have to pay for these costs. Instead, they could simply pass the cost of this largess to future generations. Who don’t vote today.
So today’s benefits are in fact paid by the rich. Who are small in numbers. And future generations. Who aren’t voting yet. You see, it’s easy to provide benefits today. That helps garner votes for today. When the costs of these benefits will be borne by a subsequent generation. A generation so far out into the future that they have no say today. But over time this future generation has gotten closer and closer to the current generation. So close that people alive today will be paying for benefits of today. More importantly, this future generation is already voting today. And that’s a BIG problem for a growing government. So expect the class warfare to get uglier still.
This could herald the end of the republic. Unless the current generation learns that they are in fact the future generation. And that they are the new ‘rich’. Regardless of how much they earn. And they’ll learn this fast as they pay for everyone else. After which they’ll see that there’s nothing left for them. Then they’ll take notice. And stop the insanity. Then, and only then, will they stop voting themselves money.
Tags: $250, 000, benefits, Benjamin Franklin, class warfare, Congress, Constitution, debt, democracy, elections, fair share, federal budget, federal government, federal treasury, Founding Fathers, Franklin, future generations, government benefits, herald the end of the republic, House of Representatives, keys to the treasury, legislators, limited government, limited powers, middle class, national treasury, poor and the middle class, popular vote, population, representative government, Republic, rich, Senate, separation of powers, states, states legislatures, tax rates, tax revenue, taxes, treasury, vote themselves money
The Devil is in the Details and the Sneakiness is in the Fine Print
You know what they say. Buyer beware. Because they’re out to get you with their sneaky advertising. Which you need to read closely. Because the devil is in the details. And the sneakiness is in the fine print. That print that no one reads. Like credit cards that send you those checks.
They may offer 0% interest for six months when you write yourself a check for $5,000. Wow. Sounds great. But if you don’t pay that off in that 6 month period look out. Through the miracle of compound interest, that $5,000 debt will grow. And that growing starts the moment you cash that check. Because in the fine print the credit card company notes that after the 6-month period they will begin charging interest at 27.24% APR. Starting on day one of the 6-month period.
People may wonder how credit cards can make any money if they don’t charge interest. Well that’s the secret of the zero-interest offers. They don’t expect you to pay it off within in that 6-month period. And the second that 6-month period ends they book $720.84 of interest income on that $5,000 they loaned you. That’s a short-term loan that yields 14.42%. And there ain’t any 6-month investment out there that can match this yield. But it doesn’t end there. The yields on the credit card loan will continue to grow. If you owe that $5,000 for 1 year, that yield rises to 30.91%. And instead of owing $5,000 you now owe $6,545.59.
A zero-interest offer seems to be good to be true. That’s because they are too good to be true. Which you’ll see when you read the fine print. If you read the fine print.
You have to be Sneaky to get People to Agree to Things that will Hurt Them in the Long Run
Now it’s obvious why they do this. Be sneaky. Because they can make a lot of money by doing this. And the more people that take them up on these zero-interest offers the more money they can make. So they put the things that would sour most people on using these checks in the fine print. In hopes few will read it. And few do.
You see, you have to be sneaky to get people to agree to things that will hurt them in the long run. You just can’t be honest. They can’t tell you that this loan will cost you nothing at 11:59 PM on the last day of the 6-month period. And that it will cost you $720.84 one minute later. Worse, your minimum monthly payment will jump about $125 as they calculate this loan into your payment. And compound interest will make that credit card balance swell like a beached whale to the point that you’ll never be able to pay it off.
You’ll lose sleep as your minimum monthly payments grow. You’ll struggle to get that balance to go down. Of course it never will. And the more those minimum payments grow the less money you have for groceries and gas. So then you’ll start paying less than the minimum due so you can put food on the table and drive to work. Then the collection calls start. It’ll get to the point that your stomach turns every time you hear the phone ring.
So you can see why they put this kind of stuff into the fine print. I mean, if they advertise that they are going to ruin your life, are you going to use one of those checks? Probably not.
The Founding Fathers hated Democracy with a Passion
So you really have to be sneaky and devious to get people to voluntarily destroy their lives. And speaking of politics, politicians are the worst. For a credit card company may try to get as much money from you as possible. But that’s just business. And they don’t swear oaths to protect you.
Thomas Jefferson hated bankers and merchants. Partly because he was forever in debt. But mostly because they can buy themselves favors. And the seller of favors is, of course, government. Jefferson was a well read man. He knew history. And he saw how combining money and government led to bad things. Corruption. Patronage. Privilege. War. Money gave government power to do its worse. And allowed a ruling minority to oppress the people for personal gain. Now even though America was founded on the principle that all men are created equal, Jefferson knew that money could, and would, change that. This is one of the reasons why the nation’s capital was located on a swamp a long, long way from the nation’s financial center. New York.
This is also a reason why the nation is a republic. And not a democracy. We have representative government. Not direct participation. For the Founding Fathers hated democracy with a passion. Why? Because all democracies fail. Once the people learn they can vote themselves whatever they want. That’s why the Founding Fathers put enlightened/educated representatives between the treasury and the people. Who will be rational and logical. And not give in to base desires.
But the Founding Fathers were a special breed. Who came along at just the right time and place. And they created something perfect as far as governments go. But as they passed from memory, the ways of the Old World became hard to resist.
You have to let Others Steal from the Treasury if You want to Steal from the Treasury
As the nation grew so did its tax base. More people meant more tax revenue. First through import tariffs. Then the income tax. And other various taxes. A little bit of tax from a huge population meant a lot of money for politicians to play with. And play they did. With the power to control these vast sums of money, they played God. Just as Jefferson warned. Money and government created a ruling minority. Or a Ruling Class. Much like the Founding Fathers fought so long and hard to end in the New World.
Of course, people won’t willingly support a Ruling Class that oppresses them. So they have to be sneaky. And hide much of what they do from the general public. By burying it deep in pages of legislation. Pork barrel spending we call it. To get a part of the population to support you by promising them free stuff. Then you honor that pledge by attaching a rider to a bill to house and feed orphans, for example. When the final bill gets passed into law not only do we house and feed orphans (which everyone supports), but we also shower select constituencies with federal dollars for their help in getting out the vote during the last election (which only those select constituencies support).
Of course you know how this plays out. If you oppose the excess spending in this bill you hate orphans. And who wants to be labeled an orphan hater? Probably not many. But chances are few will oppose it. Because to get pork you have to give pork. You have to let others steal from the treasury if you want to steal from the treasury. And this is why representatives and senators vote to pass thousand page bills without reading them. They know they’re full of shameless pork barrel spending. But as long as they include their pork they don’t care.
Short-Term Gratification with Long-Term Consequences
Politicians are a lot like those credit card companies. Promising great short-term gratification. With long-term consequences that will be a bitch. They both want our money. The credit card companies want us to go on a spending orgy so they can book fat profits on the interest they charge us. Politicians just want to go on a spending orgy with our money.
So who’s worse? The politicians, of course. They’re supposed to be looking out for us. Besides, when the credit card companies are screwing us, at least we get to enjoy the ride before the crash. Taxpayers don’t. Because their money typically goes to people who don’t pay income taxes. So they don’t get to enjoy the ride. They just suffer the crash.
Tags: all democracies fail, America, balance, Big Government, compound interest, corruption, credit card, democracy, dishonest politician, favors, fine print, Founding Fathers, income tax, legislation, long-term consequences, minimum monthly payment, money and government, patronage, politician, politics, pork, pork barrel spending, privilege, representative government, Republic, ruling class, ruling minority, short-term gratification, sneaky, sneaky legislation, spending orgy, steal from the treasury, tax base, tax revenue, taxpayer, Thomas Jefferson, treasury
Big Cities, Big Union and Big Government
If you look at a map of the House election results (provided by The Washington Post), you can see the two Americas. What you see is a red map with small dabs of blue. And where are those blue areas? The Big Cities, the big colleges, the big unions and the big urban concentrations of poor and minorities. And, of course, the liberal elite in and around the Big Cities. In other words, where you find Big Union (manufacturing, trade unions, school teachers and government employees) and Big Government. And it’s the dynamic between Big Union and Big Government that empower the liberal elite. Big Union provides campaign money and foot soldiers for Big Government. And Big Government rewards Big Union by favoring their small minority over the majority of Americans. It’s a throwback to before our Founding when kings and nobles ruled nations. Political power is devolving into fewer and fewer hands. Into those little dabs of blue.
To get a perspective of how bad and how oppressive this ruling minority elite has gotten, consider two races. Two people nationally despised won their reelections. Barney Frank, who is largely responsible for giving us the subprime mortgage crisis, won in liberal Massachusetts. And Nancy Pelosi, who forced her liberal agenda on the American people against their wishes, won by a whopping 80% in San Francisco. This is what the Founding Fathers meant when they spoke of the tyranny of the minority. These two have caused great harm to the American people. Yet they represent such a sliver of minority thought in this nation. They could not win a national vote. Yet they can destroy a nation by winning their local vote.
But it’s not all bad. If you look at the map, you see a lot of red in once dominate blue areas. New England is not completely blue anymore. New York State isn’t as blue as New York City. Pennsylvania, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois and Michigan are red outside of the Big Cities. Chicago, in fact, is a small pocket of blue adrift in a sea of red. And in Washington, Oregon and California, if you move in from the Big Money coast, you see mostly red. More importantly, if you click on the governors tab in the map, you see change, too. New York and California are blue, yes, but there’s more red than blue overall on that map. Which gives one hope that the republic the Founding Fathers gave us is not yet dead. It will be hard to gerrymander those congressional districts around the Big Cities to give such little, elitist, local voices a large national voice anymore.
It’s the Economy, Stupid. Was, and still is.
So, outside of the blue Big Cities, what do we know? Well, the exit polling told us what we already knew. It’s the economy, stupid. We’ve lost too many jobs. And that’s what we want. Jobs (see Exit poll: Economy the big dog for worried voters by Connie Cass, Associated Press, posted on Yahoo!
About a third of voters said their household suffered a job loss in the past two years.
And as we lost our jobs, we lost our homes (see Homeownership at lowest level in a decade by Alan Zibel, AP Real Estate Writer, posted on Yahoo! News).
The nation’s homeownership rate is at the lowest level in more than a decade, hampered by a rise in foreclosures and weak demand for housing.
And while we lose our jobs and our homes, what is the president doing? Going on vacation to an exclusive 5-star resort. And it’s going to cost the American taxpayer a pretty penny (see US to spend $200 mn a day on Obama’s Mumbai visit posted by Press Trust of India.
The US would be spending a whopping $200 million (Rs. 900 crore approx) per day on President Barack Obama’s visit to the city.
Does the royal family feel our pain?
Not only do they govern against our will, but they flaunt it in our faces. We struggle because of the likes of Barack Obama, Barney Frank and Nancy Pelosi. We lose our jobs and our homes (which is ironic considering we’re in this mess to begin with because of Washington’s policy to provide affordable housing to those who could not afford to buy a house). And what does the ‘royal’ family do? Go on vacation that will cost the taxpayers millions of dollars per day. I guess they can’t feel our pain. Or that they just don’t care. So think back to last summer when you spent your family vacation in your backyard because money was tight. And that team Obama will probably raise your taxes come January 1 to be ‘responsible’ to pay for their irresponsible spending. Take solace in the fact that at least he could live large on your dime. Even if you had to spend summer ‘staycation’ in your backyard.
As we proceed from the 2010 midterm elections, do not forget the dynamic between Big Government and Big Union. It won’t be easy, but they’ll continue to try to help fund those under-funded union pension plans. And they will point to the Republicans as obstructionists. That they need to compromise. Put partisanship behind us. Especially now. Since they lost the House of Representatives, the Left can’t be partisan anymore. Like they have been the last two years.
Tags: 2010 Midterm Election, affordable, American taxpayer, Barack Obama, Barney Frank, Big Cities, Big Government, Big Union, congressional districts, election results, exit polling, feel our pain, Founding, Founding Fathers, Frank, gerrymander, gerrymander those congressional districts, governors, House, House of Representatives, irresponsible spending, it's the economy, jobs, Liberal Agenda, liberal elite, midterm election, Nancy Pelosi, Obama, obstructionists, Partisanship, Pelosi, Republic, Republicans, ruling minority, ruling minority elite, staycation, Stupid, subprime mortgage crisis, the Left, two Americas, tyranny of the minority, under-funded union pension plans
Washington men didn’t live long. And George Washington thought about that. A lot. He loved his Mount Vernon. His garden. And he longed to retire there to spend out his years in peace under his vine and fig tree. But he gave up that dream when he accepted command of the Continental Army. He was already at that age when a lot of Washington men died. So when he left, no doubt he thought he may not return.
The Revolutionary War lasted 8 long years. And Washington spent those years with the army. In the field. He was at Valley Forge. He didn’t leave to go home to see Martha. No. His wife came to Valley Forge to see him.
Washington was a wealthy man. He didn’t need to make these sacrifices. A lot of wealthy men didn’t. But he did. And he sacrificed a lot. Even his eyesight. When the army officer’s wanted to mutiny over a long list of failed promises (pay, pensions, etc.), Washington pleaded with them. To not throw away the thing they’ve fought so long and hard for. As poorly as the Continental Army was treated, those words did not move them much. Then Washington pulled out a letter from a congressman to read to them. But couldn’t. After stumbling over a couple of words, he stopped. He then pulled out a pair of spectacles. No one had ever seen the great George Washington in such a public display of weakness.
“Gentlemen, you must pardon me,” he said. “I have grown gray in the service of my country, and now find myself growing blind.”
Some cried for the old man who had given so much. When he no doubt had so few years left to live. If their commanding general could make such sacrifices, so could they. So there would be no Caesar. No Cromwell. No armies would march to the seat of power. This republic would not collapse into anarchy as history often scripted her republics.
The Most Powerful Man in America Surrenders His Power
But would he be king? He could have. Easily. He had the power. And the love and adoration of the people. In fact, some were begging him to become king. Others, though, questioned his intentions. They looked at the army with a nervous unease. They were, after all, a nation built primarily from English stock. And they knew their English history. Of Oliver Cromwell. The New Model Army. Just what were his intentions?
He still stayed in touch with his officers (and later would go on to be the first president of the Society of the Cincinnati). This seemed a bit ominous to some. This is why once the war was over, people tried to forget about and disband the army as quickly as possible. To renege on the promises they made to these veterans. They just wanted these soldiers to go away. There were too many bad memories of standing armies in their midst. Whether they wore a red coat or a rag, they just wanted them gone.
Even King George questioned his intentions. Few give up power. If he did, it would place him in the pantheon of greats. But would he? Yes. He would. And did. Washington would be a Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus, the Roman farmer who walked away from his plow to assume dictatorial powers to help save his nation. When the threat was past, he returned power to the Senate and returned to his plow. And so did Washington.
Answering the Call of Duty. Again.
Then the nation called for their Cincinnatus once again. There were problems with the Confederate Congress. It was having difficulty governing the peace. There were state rivalries. Their finances were in a mess. And there was no national identity. There used to be. British. And the European nations treated with that singular entity. Great Britain. Now that the mother country was gone, there was no singular entity. No unity. Everyone was for themselves. And the European powers had to make multiple treaties with the multiple states. If they wanted to go through that headache. And many did not.
Some called for a revision to the Articles of Confederation. But it was difficult to get the states on board. A weak confederacy favored the individual states. And the individual states liked that. But it also limited their potential as a nation. Some feared the inter-state rivalries would balkanize the nation. Make the New World a repeat of the Old World. To bring the nation together would take an extraordinary effort. Or an extraordinary man. George Washington. Who agreed to attend the Philadelphia Convention in 1787.
After a long and hot summer, the Philadelphia delegates produced a constitution. With James Madison being the primary architect. They then sent it to the states for ratification. At which time James Madison and Alexander Hamilton began a writing campaign to urge its ratification. (John Jay contributed to this campaign, too, but not as much as Madison and Hamilton). Once ratified, it came time to populate the new government. Some competed with each other for some positions. But for one of the positions there was unanimity. There was but one man the people would trust with the most powerful office in the land. Their Cincinnatus. George Washington. But would he do it? Would he leave his blissful retirement beneath his vine and fig tree?
Yes. Not because he wanted to. More than 10 years had passed since this old man had agreed to command the Continental Army. He had outlived many Washington men. The way he saw it, he was living on borrowed time as it was. And there was another consideration. Against the greatest of odds, he did NOT lose the Revolutionary War. He had made mistakes in his life, but his name was safe for posterity. But if he took a risk now he could lose the good name he built. And if there was anything soldiers (and politicians) worry about, it’s their legacy. (That’s why they write memoirs.)
Another Long 8 Years
When it was clear that he was, in fact, the indispensable one, he sacrificed his personal want for the public need. Again. And again, serving a second term as president. He was ready (and looking forward to) retirement after one term. But the party politics were threatening to tear apart the new nation. The rift between Jefferson and Hamilton had grown. It was splitting the government into two camps. The Federalists (led by Hamilton) and the anti-Federalists (led by Jefferson). They pleaded for Washington to serve a second term as he was the only one who could hold them together. He consented.
That second term was particularly unpleasant for Washington. Party attacks turned into personal attacks. Even against Washington. And the ugliness got really ugly over the Jay Treaty. Many wanted war with Great Britain. But having actually fought a war with Great Britain, Washington favored peace. Yes, the treaty favored Great Britain. And, yes, it tied American interests to Great Britain, not her war time ally. France. The Jeffersonians unleashed an unfettered vitriol on the Federalists. Including Washington. But Washington bet on the right horse. Great Britain proved to be the dominant European power. And her Royal Navy came in handy protecting U.S. trade with her. Over a decade of peace and prosperity followed.
After 8 years, though, there was no persuading Washington for another 4-year term. He had grown ever older in the continued service of his country. Now he felt it more than ever that his days were few. Rarely did he know happiness like he felt at the inauguration of the 2nd president, his vice president, John Adams. Adams wrote that after he took the oath of office, Washington said, “Ay! I am fairly out and you fairly in! See which of us will be happiest!” He may not have actually said this but he no doubt felt the sentiment. And with that, he returned to his plow. Cincinnatus had come home. Where he would happily live out his remaining years. All two of them.
Where is Our Cincinnatus?
Today it’s about money and power. Not duty. Today, people want to be full-time politicians. For the money and power. And the elitist status. People get into Congress and they just don’t want to leave. Should we vote them out of office, they have a tantrum. They call their constituents stupid for not knowing who the better candidate was. And they won’t go quietly. Some will change parties. Or run as an independent. Or as a write-in candidate. Anything to stay in Washington. To hold on to their power. To stay among the elite.
The nation has deviated far from the path of disinterested public service of the Founding Fathers. The anti-Federalists would be shocked to see what became of the government they helped create. Even the Federalists. Even Hamilton. Not even he, the champion of a strong federal government, would approve of the federal government today. His mercantilist polices had the goal of making the nation rich and powerful. Not to suck the wealth out from the private sector. Which began in earnest with Wilson. Then picked with FDR. Then ramped up further with LBJ/Nixon/Ford/Carter. Had Hamilton lived in the 20th century, he would have earnestly campaigned for Ronald Reagan. To put an end to the public sector’s pillage of the private sector.
And now we find our nation adrift again. But who will step in and stop it today? Who is out there? Willing to put down their plow for disinterested public service. And by ‘plow’ I mean any real job. Worked by someone who is not part of the Washington establishment. Where is our George Washington?
Tags: 1787, Adams, Alexander Hamilton, America, anti-Federalists, Articles of Confederation, Caesar, Cincinnatus, Confederate Congress, Congress, constituents, Continental Army, Cromwell, disinterested service, elite, elitist, elitist status, English, English history, Federalists, Founding Fathers, full-time politicians, George Washington, Great Britain, Hamilton, independent, indispensable one, James Madison, Jay Treaty, Jeffersonians, John Adams, John Jay, King George, Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus, Madison, mercantilist polices, money and power, Mount Vernon, New Model Army, New World, Old World, Oliver Cromwell, peace and prosperity, personal attacks, Philadelphia Convention, private sector, public sector, Republic, Revolutionary War, rich and powerful, Royal Navy, Society of the Cincinnati, standing armies, U.S. trade, Valley Forge, vine and fig tree, Washington, Washington establishment, wealth, write-in candidate
ONE OF THE lasting consequences of war is the feminization of men. War makes widows. And fatherless sons. Their mothers raise them the best that they can. But women tend to be kinder and gentler than men. More nurturing. Fathers are, after all, the disciplinarians. “Just wait until your father gets home.” Sons with fathers knew what that meant. And it wasn’t kind, gentle nurturing.
The American Civil War killed some 600,000 men. A generation of fathers was lost. When their sons came of age, they were more sensitive to the suffering of others. And they felt a mothering urge to do something about it. In politics they became Progressives. They grew government. Because government knows best. Well, mother knows best. And a government that mothers would solve all our social ills. And these men would mother. Compassionately. And they thought all that rugged individualism was overrated.
World War I killed some 9 million men in uniform and about another 7 million in civilians. These fatherless sons would rise in power and help create the cradle-to-the-grave welfare state known as European Socialism.
World War II killed some 400,000 American men. And their sons would follow the European’s lead. They would attend the universities where the progressives taught. They came out with heads filled with caring and compassion for victims everywhere. LBJ’s Great Society would grow out of this movement. As well as a hatred for American rugged individualism. And anti-war fervor.
AND THEN YOU had the filthy, maggot-infested hippies. South Park is a crude comedy. And Cartman has few redeeming qualities. But he’s right about hippies. They ruined this country. Born in the baby boom following World War II, most had the benefit of a father. However, by the 1960s, the universities they attended were a lost cause. Their professors would attack whatever their parents taught them. They would learn to hate. In a kind, gentle, nurturing way.
They hated America. How it became. What it did. What its values were. Are. Instead, they would embrace America’s enemies. Have kind, gentle, nurturing compassion for them. They were proud Marxists. And Communists. They relished their First Amendment right to attack the American Republic that gave them that right. While they supported oppressive regimes where you had no such right. And spoke ill of the government at your own peril. Oh, they damned America and its allies for all of their ‘crimes against humanity’. But they said nothing about the reigning co-champions of human rights abuses. The Soviet Union. And Communist China. No, they wanted to extend the proletarian revolution to America. So more could suffer the worst of human rights abuses. Why would anyone adopt such a conflicting course of political action? Because they’re idiots.
Power to the People. Give Peace a Chance. All You Need is Love. They knew all the answers. John Lennon et al. War was business. Nothing more. Or the folly of kings. As the Monkees sang about in this anti-war song:
They met on the battlefield banner in hand.
They looked out across the vacant land.
And they counted the missing, one upon one,
None upon none.
The war it was over before it begun.
Two little kings playing a game.
They gave a war and nobody came.
(from Zor and Zam by Bill Chadwick and John Chadwick
Album: The Birds, the Bees and the Monkees)
This is what the anti-war people believe. Either war is business. Or the folly of kings. That there is no ‘bad guy’ in war. Just pawns. And units of production. Because human nature is peaceful.
WHO DID THE high school bullies pick on? Who did they pansts? Steal their lunch money from? Give a wedgie to? A swirlie? Beat up. Belittle with name calling? Not tough guys. Weak guys. This is human nature. The strong feed on the weak.
WHEN GUN OWNERS discovered a ‘loophole’ in Floridian law about carrying concealed weapons, they started carrying concealed weapons. What happened? Crime on Floridians dropped. Crimes on tourists rose. Why? Because the bad guys knew that tourists didn’t carry concealed weapons. This is human nature. The strong feed on the weak.
BACK WHEN DETROIT was the murder capital of the U.S., a friend traveled there and bought a t-shirt. It read, “Detroit: Where the Weak are Killed and Eaten.” Now I don’t recall reports of cannibalism in the Motor City, but the message was clear. Figuratively, of course. Human nature was becoming animal nature. The strong feed on the weak.
MANY ANIMAL SPECIES have large litters. Or numerous litters. Like bunnies. Cute little, fluffy, harmless bunnies. But bunnies are tasty. They’re low on the food chain. They are food to almost every carnivore in the wild. Including man. Few bunnies live long before becoming a meal. This is animal nature. The strong feed on the weak.
“IN EVERY GENERATION there is a chosen one. She alone will stand against the vampires, the demons and the forces of darkness. She is the slayer.” (From the television show Buffy the Vampire Slayer.) In the world of vampires, demons and the forces of darkness, it’s kill or be eaten. It’s even the nature of the supernatural. The strong feed on the weak.
BIG GOVERNMENT AND UNIONS grew big and powerful in the 20th century to protect the little guy. They said that Big Business and the free market favored the rich and powerful. At the expense of the poor and weak. They said it was human nature. For the strong to feed on the weak.
DURING THE TIME of America’s involvement in Vietnam, the Communist Party of Kampuchea went on a killing spree. While the hippies protested Vietnam, they praised the social compassion of anti-capitalistic communism. Power to the People. Baby. Meanwhile, the Khmer Rouge killed their own people wholesale (by a percentage of population killed, the greatest in history). Included in the genocide lists were students or people with glasses. They killed any ‘educated’ person. And those who even looked educated. So, yes, the hippies supported a movement that would have killed their own worthless selves if given the chance. Human nature at its worse. The strong feed on the weak. And the stupidity of hippies.
THERE ARE BAD guys in the world. And there’s no denying it. Human nature is not peaceful. It is anything but. Darwinian Theory never played out so fiercely. The strong feed on the weak. They seek them out. Like a predator in the wild, they seek out the weak and maimed and move in for the kill. You can’t reason with them. Just like you can’t reason with a bully. Those who think that we can need to man-up and face facts. And if you can’t, don’t worry. We have others that are more than willing to man-up and fight our battles for us. To keep America strong. If we let them.
Predators don’t respect weakness. They respect power. And power is the only thing that will deter them. The bad guys have attacked American soil few times. Because America is powerful. You mess with the big dog and it’s going to bite you. And maul you. So the bad guys don’t mess with the big dog often. Because they pay dearly when they do.
America has known peace and prosperity like few other people can possibly imagine. And the reason for that is that we have the biggest and baddest military in the world. It kept the Soviets at bay in Europe. It thumped Iraqi’s vaunted million-man army in less than 100 hours of combat. It then thumped them again with a smaller force. (That display of power cowed Libya from sponsoring terrorism for fear of that awesome power thumping them next. And it got the Saudis to do the politically unthinkable – take on Al Qaeda in their kingdom.) It ran bin Laden deep underground leaving him more impotent than threatening. It held the line in Korea. And it won every battle it fought in Vietnam. (Of course, everything went to hell in a handbasket when we left. But that’s another story.)
But that kind of power doesn’t come cheap. And you gotta have the will to use it. But when you do, you get peace. An expensive peace, yes. But peace is always cheaper than war. Especially when that peace deters war.
Tags: 1960s, Al Qaeda, All You Need is Love, America, American, anti-capitalistic, Anti-war, baby boom, bad guy, Big Business, big dog, Big Government, Big Government, bin Laden, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, bullies, Cartman, Civil War, Communism, Communist China, Communist Party of Kampuchea, communists, concealed weapons, cradle-to-the-grave, crimes against humanity, Darwinian Theory, Detroit, disciplinarians, Europe, European Socialism, fatherless sons, feminization of men, First Amendment, free market, genocide, Give Peace a Chance, Great Society, gun owners, hippies, human nature, human rights abuses, Iraqi, John Lennon, Khmer Rouge, Korea, LBJ, Libya, little guy, Marxists, men, Monkees, mothers, Motor City, nurturing, oppressive regimes, Peace, peaceful, political action, Power to the People, predator, Progressives, proletarian revolution, Republic, rugged individualism, Saudis, slayer, social ills, South Park, Soviet Union, Soviets, terrorism, unions, vampires, victims, Vietnam, War, welfare state, women, World War I, World War II, Zor and Zam