The changing of the Benghazi Talking Points for Political Reasons was not Political according to CIA

Posted by PITHOCRATES - April 5th, 2014

Week in Review

Susan Rice said it.  Hillary Clinton said it.  And President Obama said it.  Over and over again.  The attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi was due to a YouTube video that incited a spontaneous protest that resulted with an attack on the mission with assault weapons and pre-sighted mortars.  Highly improbable but that’s what they said.  Over and over again.  It wasn’t a terrorist attack.  Because President Obama killed Osama bin Laden and won the War on Terror.  The 2012 campaign slogan was Osama bin Laden is dead.  General Motors is alive.  And al Qaeda is on the ropes.  On the run.  No longer a threat to the United States.  That’s why we had to reelect President Obama.  For he sure couldn’t point to any successes when it came to the economy.

Of course beefing up security in Benghazi would have harmed that narrative.  So while the British were pulling out of Benghazi because a resurgent al Qaeda was making it too dangerous the U.S. State Department denied Ambassador Steven’s request for additional security.  Because a resurgent al Qaeda was making it very dangerous in Benghazi.  But the American people didn’t hear that.  No.  All they heard was that Osama bin Laden is dead.  General Motors is alive.  And al Qaeda is on the ropes.  On the run.  No longer a threat to the United States.  Of course the murder of four Americans in Benghazi said otherwise (see Former CIA official: No politics in Benghazi memo by DONNA CASSATA, AP, posted 4/2/2014 on Yahoo! News).

The CIA’s former deputy director said Wednesday he deleted references to terrorism warnings from widely disputed talking points on the deadly 2012 Benghazi attack to avoid the spy agency’s gloating at the expense of the State Department…

Morell, a 33-year veteran of the agency who has served six Republican and Democratic presidents, insisted that politics had no bearing on the revisions to the talking points and said he was under no pressure to protect either President Barack Obama or then Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton…

The White House, wrapped up in a fierce presidential campaign, made only minor editorial changes to the talking points, according to the onetime CIA official.

The intelligence community’s talking points, compiled for members of Congress, suggested the Sept. 11 attack stemmed from protests in Cairo and elsewhere over an anti-Islamic video rather than an assault by extremists.

Republicans have accused the Obama administration of trying to mislead the American people about an act of terrorism in the final weeks before the November election.

Morell deleted references to extremist threats linked to al-Qaida in versions of the talking points that were used by Susan Rice, then U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, in a series of Sunday talk show appearances. Morell said his actions were driven by the information provided by intelligence community analysts and the Defense Department.

The deleted references to terrorism in the talking points were not political?  His revisions to the talking points were not to protect either President Barack Obama or then Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton?  Funny.  As that’s exactly what they did.  They protected President Obama and helped him win reelection.  And they protected Hillary Clinton.  Who is now the Democrat frontrunner for 2016.  Well, so far, at least.

The left is still trying to blame 9/11 (the first one in 2001) on President Bush and Condoleezza Rice.  For missing the signs that al Qaeda was a threat.  And that something big was coming.  Can you imagine the fury over Benghazi had it happened under President Bush’s watch?  While they were in a campaign season?  There would be no talking point revisions.  They would have lambasted President Bush and Condoleezza Rice.  The press would have torn into this story like a pack of hyenas tearing into a gazelle.  The media would have crapped all over the Bush administration.  But the Obama administration?  When the president, Hilary Clinton and Susan Rice all lied about a YouTube video?  Over and over again?  When the CIA revised the talking points so it didn’t sound like there was a problem with terrorism anymore?  All lies.  And a huge cover-up.  But we hear nothing but the sound of crickets from the media.

Sure, they can say it wasn’t political.  But the result of those revisions was very political.  It helped President Obama win reelection.  Because he had al Qaeda on the run.  Which he didn’t.  In fact, his foreign policy has made the world a more dangerous place.  For al Qaeda is resurgent everywhere.  In Egypt.  Libya.  Syria.  Iraq.  Afghanistan.  Yemen.  And elsewhere.  Oh, and Iran is working on a nuclear bomb.  And Vladimir Putin annexed Crimea to Russia.  Because he could.  This stuff is happening in part because people voted for President Obama believing the lie that al Qaeda was on the run.  When it wasn’t.  And because we reelected President Obama his failed foreign policy continues.  As the bad people of the world stand up and take notice.

The United States of America under President Obama is weak.  It may talk the talk but it sure doesn’t walk the walk.  So the bad guys are getting bolder.  Knowing the time is right to push the United States around.  For we are a sleeping bear that just can’t be wakened.  Apparently.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Protesters on Wall Street haven’t a Clue of what they’re Protesting About

Posted by PITHOCRATES - October 1st, 2011

Why are they Protesting?  Because Protesting is Fun.

They’ve gathered on Wall Street.  And they will be heard.  That is, if they had anything to say (see Occupy Wall Street protesters driven by varying goals by Tina Susman posted 9/29/2011 on the Los Angeles Times).

“At a certain point, there’s a valid criticism in people asking, ‘What are you doing here?'”

What are they doing there?  I think that’s pretty clear.  They’re protesting.  Why?  Because protesting is fun.  That’s why.

They may not know why they’re there.  Or understand how the free market economy works.  Have the foggiest idea of what capitalism really is.  All they know is that they had some Leftist high school teachers and/or some Leftist college professors who told them how much fun protesting was.  How much they enjoyed it all those years ago.  When they were dirty, filthy, stinking hippies.  Enjoying the college ‘education’ that Daddy paid for with his capitalistic career.  And how much they hated their fathers.  For being capitalists.  Which allowed their parents to give these spoiled little brats whatever they wanted.

Funny how some things never change.

The Man Sure gets Around; of course he was a Much Younger Man during the Vietnam era Protests.

But surely they must have a reason for being there?  Other than sticking it to the man (see Wall Street protest’s success not easily measured by the Associated Press posted 10/1/2011 on TRIBLIVE).

It all has the feel of a classic street protest with one exception: It’s unclear exactly what the demonstrators want…

“It’s time for us to come together to realize we are the masses, and we can make things happen.”

But he couldn’t say what, exactly, he wanted to happen. Handmade signs carried by some of the demonstrators — “Less is More” and “Capitalism is evil” — hardly make it clearer…

… the group’s lack of specificity serves a purpose because it invites outrage over a full spectrum of societal grievances. Indeed, some demonstrators say they are against Wall Street greed, others say they are protesting global warming and still others say they are protesting “the man.”

Yes.  The man.  I remember first hearing about ‘the man’ during the Vietnam era protests.  The man sure gets around.  Of course he was a much younger man in those days.  But just as oppressive.  He had a job.  He paid taxes.  Saved for retirement.  And saved for the college education for the next generation of protestors.  That vicious, selfish bastard.

The Protestors have no Leader or Message but have the Support of Teachers and Transport Workers

But these protestors are not alone.  Other anti-capitalists have come out to support them (see Wall Street protesters set to march on police by Ray Sanchez posted 9/30/2011 on Reuters).

… a unionized subway worker, said, “Last year we had 900 of our members laid off … These are our issues too: Wall Street, the banks, layoffs, the struggle that these young people are spearheading is our struggle too.”

Among those pledging solidarity were the United Federation of Teachers and the Transport Workers Union Local 100, which has 38,000 members. The unions could provide important organizational and financial support for the largely leaderless movement.

It was the high unemployment that cut the tax base of the city that required them to lay off some of their employees.  Because they couldn’t pay them and those generous pensions and health care benefits for their retirees.  And that didn’t have anything to do with the Wall Street banks.

It is interesting that the teachers and the transport workers are supporting a movement that has no message.  At least when the unions protest you know what they want.  Money.  And benefits.  But these protestors have no leader.  And no message.  But the teachers and the transport workers will be right there with them to help them win what they want.  More fun protesting.  I guess.

Corruption is Initiated by Government because they have the Power, they Write the Laws

Perhaps we should listen to the protestors themselves.  Let them tell us why they’re protesting.  Bill O’Reilly sent Jesse Watters to Wall Street.  To find out.  And here is what he learned.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Crl31Xgc3_w

Well, that clarifies everything.  These people are demonstrating how poor our educational system is.

What they’re complaining about is not capitalism.  It’s crony capitalism.  Crony capitalism is when politicians sell themselves to the highest bidder.  They say if you give me lots of money I will write laws that favor you.  This is the corruption.  And government initiates it.  Because they have the power.  They write the laws.  And set the rules of the game.  And if you want to play you have to pay.

Not all corporations do.  Microsoft didn’t.  Until they were called to Congress in a huge antitrust case.  Because they were giving consumers something free.  The Internet browser Internet Explorer.  Microsoft has since learned their lesson.  And now lobby accordingly.

Democrats need the Youth Vote because the Young stay neither Young nor Ignorant Forever

There are some older people in these protests.  But the vast majority are college age kids.  Many of who will grow up and raise families.  Have a career.  And will think about other pressing issues of the day other than legalizing pot.

Yes.  These kids today?  A lot of them will be ‘the man’ tomorrow.  And some punk kids will demonize them in a similar protest some 10-20 years in the future.

This is why the Democrats work so hard on getting the youth vote.  Because the young stay neither young nor ignorant forever.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,