Free Speech can be an Instrument of Change
Before there was a Nazi Germany there was a German republic. The Weimar Republic. Where people were free to say anything they wanted to. In fact, it was that freedom of speech that allowed Adolf Hitler to rise to power. Who then took that freedom of speech he used away from everyone else. Pumped out state propaganda (i.e., lies). And did horrible things to people. Including to his fellow Germans who dared to speak freely.
Free speech can be an instrument of change. Hitler knew that. And used it. But knowing what an instrument of change speaking freely can be he banned free speech after he effected change with it. And then started the lying. Joseph Goebbels, the head of state propaganda, lied and he lied big. Saying that if the people heard a lie enough they would believe it. Especially a big lie.
Germans are not evil people. But they did vote for members of the Nazi Party. Of course, when they were voting for members of the Nazi Party it wasn’t the Nazi Party of the Holocaust. No. It was a much kinder and gentler Nazi Party. A party for the workers. And the people. For the Nazi Party was the National Socialist German Workers’ Party. It was nothing more than big government taking care of the people. At least, that was the lie. And the people fell for it. Giving us one of the darkest chapters in world history.
The Natural State of Life for people throughout History has been one of Oppression
As Nazi power expanded free speech withered and died. The free press became an arm of the state. Telling the people only what the state wanted the people to hear. Not what the people wanted to know. The truth. No. Instead, all the people got were lies. To advance the state’s agenda. And to squelch any discontent of the state. For the few who dared to speak up or criticize the state the Gestapo (the state police) was there to arrest, torture, imprison or kill them.
This is why truth is so important to a free people. And why it’s such a threat to an oppressive state. For the governed far exceed those who govern. So the only way a minority power can rise to a dictatorship is by cowing the people through fear and intimidation. Keeping them blissfully ignorant of the truth. And feeding them nothing but lies via the state propaganda machine. Something a free press makes difficult to do. Which is why a dictatorship shuts down free speech.
This is something as old as time. For the natural state of life for people throughout history has been one of oppression. Something our Founding Fathers were very aware of being gentlemen of the Enlightenment. And students of history. Which is why they gave us the First Amendment:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
And a big part of the First Amendment is protection of the truth by the guardians of the truth. A free press.
The Complicit and Corrupt Media supports a Political Agenda instead of being Guardians of the Truth
The free press brought Watergate to the attention of the American people. And caused President Nixon to resign. Because of the cover-up. Not the crime. When Oliver North traded arms for hostages during the Reagan administration the free press was all over that. Irangate. A play on Watergate. And when news surfaced that the Bush family pressured the military to improve President George W. Bush’s Air National Guard service record during the 2004 presidential campaign they were all over that, too. But it turned out that this was a lie. And we now know this as Memogate. For the documents that CBS said proved this were obvious forgeries.
In other words, the media lied during the 2004 presidential campaign. To harm President Bush’s reelection chances. Making the media less of a free press and more an arm of the Democrat Party. A propaganda machine. For the mainstream media these days is less about the truth and more about Democrat propaganda. As the Obama administration has had a flurry of scandals that gets scant coverage in the free press. The IRS targeting of conservatives. Benghazi. Spying on the Associated Press. Accusing journalist James Rosen of being a criminal for reporting unflattering news leaked to him (referred to as Rosengate). Fast and Furious. The lies, misinformation and backroom deals to pass Obamacare into law. Etc.
The legacy of the Obama administration will not be the scandals. But the complicit and corrupt media. A media that was derelict in its duty to safeguard the truth. Instead choosing to disseminate lies. And ignoring news that is unfavorable to the Obama administration. Should this nation stop being exceptional. And become ordinary. Like the history before us where the natural state of life was one of oppression. It won’t be the emerging dictatorship to blame. It will be the complicit and corrupt media that allowed it to happen. By choosing lies over truth. And supporting a political agenda instead of being guardians of the truth.
Tags: dictatorship, First Amendment, free press, free speech, freedom of speech, Hitler, lies, Nazi, Nazi Party, Obama administration, oppression, propaganda, truth
Hitler received the Iron Cross for Bravery which carried a lot of Currency in a Militaristic Germany
Adolf Hitler could give a speech that fired up the masses. People loved him. The Nazis rose to power by winning elections. People elected them because they liked what the Nazis were saying. Things were not that good in Germany. The victorious Allies blamed World War I on them even though all nations jumped in enthusiastically. And then to add insult to injury the Allies made Germany pay reparations. Burdening Germany with the cost of World War I.
This was especially galling as Germany didn’t lose the war. The war ended in an armistice. Which is a mutual cessation of warfare. Not unconditional surrender. And yet here was Germany. Being treated as if they surrendered unconditionally. It made a lot of people feel angry. And betrayed. Enter Adolf Hitler. Who could tap into that anger and feelings of betrayal.
Hitler was a war veteran. He served as a dispatch runner in World War I. Wounded by artillery. And blinded temporarily by mustard gas. He even received the Iron Cross for bravery. Although it may have had more to do with spending so much time with senior officers at headquarters that issued those dispatches. But for a militaristic Germany an Iron Cross carried a lot of currency.
When the Reichstag burned down Hitler blamed the Marxists and turned Germany into a Police State
So Hitler was a brave war hero. Even though he didn’t actually use a weapon. Which was a good foundation to build on. For war heroes don’t stab people in the back after fighting bravely for them in war. Which is how many Germans felt about the politicians. Betrayed. Victims of the evil, conniving politicians. So the people felt victimized. And they were looking for someone to stand up for them. To right these wrongs.
Hitler wanted to be an artist. But when that didn’t work he turned to politics. And learned what a good speaker he was. He even studied how to become a better speaker. How to look. How to use his hands. How to inflect his voice. His speeches became very moving. Very dramatic. He made the defeated Germans feel better. For he told them that it wasn’t their fault. It was the politicians, and the Marxists, that stabbed Germany in the back. And he was the one man that could do something about it.
When the Reichstag burned down he blamed the Marxists. Who the Nazis shared power with in the Reichstag. But didn’t want to. It’s still debated who started the fire (the communists, the Nazis, others) but what it did was allow the newly appointed chancellor, Adolf Hitler, to urge President Hindenburg to suspend all civil liberties so they could hunt these communists down like the dogs they were. President Hindenburg did. And the government rounded up the communists. With them out of the government the Nazis no longer had to share power. And turned Germany into a police state. To keep that power.
The Equation Brutal Dictators use to stay in Power is Victimization + Demonization + Emotion = Power
Hitler was charismatic. He could give a powerful speech. And after the Reichstag fire he controlled the people. Using censorship and propaganda he made himself god-like. The war hero. The savior of the German people. To undo all the injustice of the Versailles Treaty. Standing up to the Allies. Punishing those who stabbed Germany in the back (first the Marxists and then the Jews). And restoring German pride. Because he got even with those who wronged the German people. The people loved him. He could do no wrong in their eyes. No matter how much wrong he did. Which he could hide from the people. Thanks to his censoring of the free press. And his state propaganda machine. Which is why people packed stadiums and the sides of roads. Showering him with their adoration.
Adolf Hitler was Germany. Germany was Adolf Hitler. His national socialism provided for the people. In return the people were subservient to the state. Germany was more important than the individual. And Adolf Hitler was more important than Germany. So anything he did was okay. For he could do no wrong. As there was nothing more important than Adolf Hitler. For Hitler was a cult of personality. Above the law. And god-like. Where people believed he was the only one that could save the nation. And would do anything for him. With the most devout joining the SS. Fighting with unbounded fanaticism in combat. And carrying out the Holocaust with ruthless efficiency. They pledged their loyalty to Adolf Hitler. Not Germany. And would do anything for him. Anything at all. Even torture and kill their fellow Germans. If that was what their Führer wanted.
This is how dictators were able to do some of the things they did. Because they were a cult of personality. Mao Zedong. Saddam Hussein. Benito Mussolini. Muammar Gaddafi. Kim Il-sung. Kim Jong-il. Kim Jong-un. These brutal dictators were/are all worshipped by their people. At least the people they weren’t/aren’t torturing or killing. For they had an equation they used to remain in power. Victimization + Demonization + Emotion = Power. Similar to the equation the Democrats use to win elections. Victimization + Demonization + Emotion = Democrat Votes. Where they victimize the people. Find someone to demonize for this victimization. Such as Marxists and Jews in Nazi Germany. Or Republicans in the United States. Then use state propaganda to disseminate their lies. Like Joseph Goebbels did in Nazi Germany. And like the mainstream media in the United States disseminates Democrat talking points. And then use fiery rhetoric to incite the people’s emotions. Like Hitler, Hussein, Mussolini, Gaddafi, Kim Il-sung, Kim Jong-il, Kim Jong-un and every other cult of personality did. Like these ‘god-like’ people still do today.
Tags: Adolf Hitler, Allies, betrayal, betrayed, censorship, communists, cult of personality, Democrat, demonization, dictators, emotion, Gaddafi, Germany, god-like, Hitler, Hussein, Kim Il Sung, Kim Jong Il, Kim Jong Un, Marxists, Mussolini, Nazi, Nazi Germany, police state, politicians, propaganda, Reichstag, Reichstag Fire, stab in the back, victimization, World War I
Even though Hillary Clinton lied about Benghazi the Press is more Interested in Bridgegate
The Senate Intelligence Committee released its report on the 2012 attacks in Benghazi. Surprisingly, or perhaps not surprisingly, actually more of a stating of the obvious, at least for those without their heads up their backsides in blind adoration of President Obama, those who can find no fault with him or his administration no matter how many scandals and lies we catch them in, as their heads are up their aforementioned backsides, the report does not agree with the Obama administration version of what caused this tragedy (see Senate report: Attacks on U.S. compounds in Benghazi could have been prevented by Adam Goldman and Anne Gearan posted 1/15/2014 on The Washington Post).
A long-delayed Senate Intelligence Committee report released Wednesday faulted both the State Department and the intelligence community for not preventing attacks on two outposts in Benghazi, Libya, that killed four Americans, including the U.S. ambassador, in 2012.
The bipartisan report laid out more than a dozen findings regarding the assaults on a diplomatic compound and a CIA annex in the city. It said the State Department failed to increase security at its mission despite warnings, and blamed intelligence agencies for not sharing information about the existence of the CIA outpost with the U.S. military…
The document contains only one mention of then-Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton…
President Obama, Secretary of State Clinton and UN Ambassador Rice all stated publically that the attack in Benghazi was caused by a spontaneous protest over an obscure YouTube video. They didn’t say it once. They said it again and again. It was the YouTube video. Period. Which can’t be true if the State Department could have prevented this attack. For the only way that could have happened was if there were in fact identified security issues that were promptly ignored by the Obama administration. Not an unknown and unexpected spontaneous protest out of nowhere one day. So they all lied. It was planned and coordinated. And had nothing to do with that obscure YouTube video.
And yet they only mentioned Secretary Clinton once in their report. Odd considering she failed to do everything she could to protect her people and then lied about it. You’d think that would warrant more than one mention. This is big news. At least you’d think it would be. But other than a few newspapers and Fox News the media isn’t talking about how Secretary Clinton lied. Instead they are more interested if another politician lied. A governor. In New Jersey. Who the polls show is the greatest threat against a Hillary Clinton presidency. They want to know what Chris Christie knew. When he knew it. And if he lied about knowing it.
Hillary Clinton’s Incompetence and Indifference to Americans dying doesn’t Interest the Press
They call it Bridgegate. A play on Watergate. Something a young Hillary Clinton went after Richard Nixon like a hyena tearing away at the entrails of a fallen prey. Because Nixon lied. He knew about a rank amateur burglary after the fact. And then used the power of the executive branch to try and cover it up. Much like the Obama administration has done often. Only Nixon didn’t have a complicit press that would do whatever they could for their dear leader. But I digress.
Apparently the mayor of Fort Lee, N.J., didn’t endorse Governor Christie in his reelection campaign. And as payback a couple of Christie’s staffers closed some traffic lanes on the George Washington Bridge to cause the mother of all traffic backups in Fort Lee. No one died like in Benghazi. But this is what the press and the Democrats (even the Democrats outside of the press) want to know about. And some are even using the ‘I’ word. Impeachment (see Subpoenas Expected for Chris Christie Aides Over Bridge Scandal by GILLIAN MOHNEY posted 1/12/2014 on ABC News).
Legislative subpoenas could be served to the aides of New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie as early as Monday sources told ABC News today.
Christie has been under intense political scrutiny after it was revealed that some of his top political aides shut down key traffic lanes on the George Washington Bridge — the busiest bridge in the world — in September for what appear to be politically motivated reasons…
Some Democratic lawmakers are saying that Christie could face impeachment hearings if it turns out he knew about the lane closures and authorized them.
Wow. Completely different from the approach in getting answers from Secretary Clinton. Where when she finally appeared before Congress the Democrats spent more time puckering up and kissing her backside. And when she said “what difference does it make” if it was her incompetence and indifference to Americans dying or if it was some spontaneous protest where average ordinary Muslims pulled rocket propelled grenades and mortars out of their wallets and purses to storm the American mission in a military assault they applauded her moxy. Saying, “You go, girl.” Figuratively, of course.
Without an Independent and Free Press you can’t keep Government Honest
It’s not so much a double standard as it is a biased press. Much of the mainstream media today is more an extension of the Democrat Party than a free press. Who spend more time writing propaganda for the left. Democrats. Elitists who think like they think. And know as they know that they are better, wiser and more enlightened than the ignorant masses. This is why they are foaming at the mouth over Bridgegate. And ignore Secretary Clinton’s incompetence and indifference over the attack in Benghazi. She who criticized candidate Barack Obama and his lack of experience. Saying he wouldn’t know what to do if he got that 3 AM call like she would. “There’s trouble brewing in Benghazi as we approach the anniversary of 9/11? Well, what do you want me to do about it?” Or, perhaps, it was something more like this. “Tell it to someone who gives a damn.” Of course it should be noted that this trouble did not start with a 3 AM telephone call. It was a gradual buildup of trouble that she responded to with incompetence and indifference.
It’s sad what the American press has come to. Even Britain with her socialist tendencies following World War II at least still has a fierce free press. That will speak truth to power. Put their country first instead of puckering up and kissing the backsides of those in the political party they favor. Ignoring their lies, crimes and misdemeanors. Such as letting Americans die so as not to spoil the campaign narrative. Al Qaeda was reeling and in retreat. And they couldn’t allow security concerns in Libya to upset that message. So they abandoned the Americans in Benghazi. And hoped the resurgence of al Qaeda in Libya wouldn’t hurt President Obama’s reelection chances. And counted on their friends in the media not to question and disseminate the lie about the YouTube video causing a spontaneous protest that caused average Muslims to pull out rocket propelled grenades and mortars from their wallets and purses to wage war. Now contrast the sycophant American press to the British press (see David Cameron says British Press plays ‘vital’ role in democracy by Matthew Holehouse posted 1/17/2014 on The Telegraph).
“At its best, the British Press, the political Press, have a vital role to play in our country.
“Yes: rowdy, tenacious, sceptical, uncontrollable, often uncomfortable for our politicians. But British political reporting is deservedly respected around the world, for the way it probes, it inquires, it scrutinises, and these things are linchpins of our democracy…”
Mr Cameron spoke movingly of a trip he made, accompanied by political reporters including from the Daily Telegraph, to a newspaper office in northern Sri Lanka, where journalists had been murdered after criticising the government.
“It was an incredibly powerful moment. It was a reminder of just how fortunate we are in this country to have a Press that is free, that is open, that is able to stand up to the powerful.”
Without an independent and free press how do you keep government honest? How do you protect the American people from the lies, crimes and misdemeanors of government? You can’t. Instead you get propaganda that helps the powerful grow more powerful. And it eventually gets to the point that politicians no longer debate in the arena of ideas. They just look for opportunities to destroy their enemies. Challengers to their power. Like Chris Christie. Who polls better against Hillary Clinton than any other potential Republican candidate. So they attack Christies over Bridgegate. To destroy him. And they circle the wagons around Hillary Clinton to protect her from her incompetence and indifference over Benghazigate. While never worrying what their helping the powerful to become more powerful could do one day.
Tags: Al Qaeda, Benghazi, Benghazigate, Bridgegate, Chris Christie, Christie, Clinton, crimes, Democrat, Democrat Party, free press, George Washington Bridge, Hillary Clinton, impeachment, incompetence, indifference, Libya, lies, media, misdemeanors, mortars, Nixon, Obama administration, President Obama, press, propaganda, rocket propelled grenades, Secretary Clinton, spontaneous protest, State Department, video, Watergate, YouTube video
Week in Review
Two more liberal icons fall. The Boston Globe. And The Washington Post. Why? Well, the left would say it’s because Americans are just too stupid to know what good journalism is. While the right will say these papers are nothing more than a propaganda arm for the liberal Obama administration. Who can find no wrong in whatever they do. But the American people can. And they’ve just grown tired of these papers carrying the water of the liberal cause (see Future of LA Times still in question after Washington Post, Boston Globe sales by James O’Toole posted 8/7/2013 on CNNMoney).
The last couple of days have been a whirlwind for the newspaper industry, with both The Washington Post and The Boston Globe finding new owners. Is The Los Angeles Times next..?
The Los Angeles Times, by contrast, is widely known to have been on the block for months, but a sale has been slow in coming…
A number of possible buyers for Tribune’s newspaper properties have been mentioned in recent media reports, including Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp, billionaire industrialists Charles and David Koch and a group of investors in Southern California including business magnates Eli Broad and Ron Burkle…
Charles Koch and his brother David are well-known supporters of conservative causes, and their interest in Tribune’s newspapers has provoked an outcry from a number of left-leaning groups who fear they would use the titles to push their political agenda.
“We need newspapers that are dedicated to providing objective and high-quality reporting, not another Fox-news style propaganda machine,” AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka said in May.
Yeah, right. Objective and high-quality reporting. Like the AFL-CIO would never want a newspaper publisher to have a liberal bias. And favor their cause. No, they would never want that. Pull the other one.
The Washington Post, The Boston Globe and The Los Angeles Times all have a liberal bias. Which is part of the reason they are failing. For 75% of the American people don’t think like the liberals controlling these papers (see Conservatives Remain the Largest Ideological Group in U.S. by Lydia Saad posted 1/12/2012 on Gallup). Yet these liberals insult 75% of the American people on a daily basis. And they wonder why they’re losing subscribers.
Truth be told the more objective papers are on the right. Because they don’t have to lie about how their destructive economic policies are good for the country. They don’t have to lie about how making nice with America’s enemies will make our enemies our friends. And they don’t have to lie about how Obamacare will lower health care costs while providing more people with high quality health care. These policies have been a disaster for the liberals. Yet you won’t read that in these liberal papers. Those papers that are supposed to provide objective and high-quality reporting. But are little more than a propaganda arm of the Obama administration.
And yet they wonder why they’re losing subscribers.
Tags: Boston Globe, liberal, liberal bias, liberal papers, Los Angeles Times, papers, propaganda, Washington Post
Week in Review
Jimmy Carter was a very weak president. When he took over fighting the Cold War he stopped fighting it. Choosing détente instead. Making nice with our enemies. And weakened the U.S. military. It got so bad that the Soviets didn’t believe he had the guts to launch his nuclear weapons. Thinking that perhaps MAD (mutually assured destruction) wasn’t so assured anymore. And began formulating a nuclear first-strike plan. Bringing the United States close to nuclear war. Because our enemies viewed him as weak.
Then came Ronald Reagan. Who reversed the Carter decline. And made our enemies fear and respect us once again. Choosing to win the Cold War instead of making nice with our enemies. As communism was a wretched system that enslaved her people who yearned to breathe free. Exporting its oppression wherever it could throughout the world. Where we’re feeling the fallout to this day. Thanks to Jimmy Carter making nice to our enemy (see EXCLUSIVE: New book reveals how KGB operation seeded Muslim countries with anti-American, anti-Jewish propaganda during the 1970s, laying the groundwork for Islamist terrorism against U.S. and Israel by David Martosko posted 6/25/2013 on the Daily Mail).
The highest-ranking Soviet-bloc intelligence officer ever to defect to the West claims in a new book that anti-American Islamic terrorism had its roots in a secret 1970s-era KGB plot to harm but the United States and Israel by seeding Muslim countries with carefully targeted propaganda.
Yuri Andropov, the KGB chief for 15 years before he became the Soviet premier, sent hundreds of agents and thousands of copies of propaganda literature to Muslim countries.
‘By 1972,’ according to the book, ‘Andropov’s disinformation machinery was working around the clock to persuade the Islamic world that Israel and the United States intended to transform the rest of the world into a Zionist fiefdom…’
Andropov began his leadership of the KGB just months before the 1967 Six-Day War between Arabs and Israelis, in which Israel humiliated the key Soviet allies Syria and Egypt. And he decided to settle the score by training Palestinian militants to hijack El Al airplanes and bomb sites in Jerusalem.
But more shocking, Andropov commissioned the first Arabic translation of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, a Russian-forged 1905 propaganda book that alleged Jews were plotting to take over Europe – and were being aided by the United States…
Kennedy-era Soviet premier Nikita Khrushchev’s disinformation campaigns ‘widened the gap between Christianity and Judaism,’ according to the authors. And ‘Andropov’s disinformation turned the Islamic world against the United States and ignited the international terrorism that threatens us today.’
This is the enemy that Jimmy Carter was trying to make nice to. One that was widening the gap between Christianity and Judaism. And one that was turning the Islamic world against the United States. Which the Soviets did well. Giving us the mess we have today.
The Soviet Union was officially an atheist state. Who shut down the Russian Orthodox Church. As they wanted no other powers or influences over their people’s lives. Which is why they had no problem putting the major world religions at war with each other. And explains why today the Russians always seem to fall on the side against the U.S. and Israel. For they worked hard to foment that anti-American and anti-Israeli sentiment. And Vladimir Putin was once KGB. The machine that created this sentiment. And apparently he still wants to collect the dividends from their old Soviet-era allies.
So it appears that the War on Terror is nothing more than the Cold War redux. It’s not a rogue power that filled a vacuum left by the Soviet collapse. But a power that the Soviets created maturing at the time of the Soviet collapse. Too late to help them not lose the Cold War to Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher. But perhaps not too late to further expand Russian power over their Soviet-era allies. Thanks to that anti-American and anti-Israeli sentiment inflaming the Islamic world. The Soviets made them our enemy. Not any YouTube video. Or George W. Bush. And no amount of making nice to them is going to change that.
Tags: Andropov, anti-American, anti-Jewish, Arabs, Christianity, Cold War, Communism, Islamic terrorism, Islamic world, Israelis, Jimmy Carter, Judaism, KGB, making nice with our enemies, nuclear, propaganda, Ronald Reagan, Soviet, Soviet collapse, Soviet Union, Soviet-era allies
Before WWII there were many who Admired the Great Things Authoritative and Charismatic Dictators were Doing
The Nazi Party is one of the most documented rises of totalitarianism. A system of government where everything and everyone is subordinated to the state. Where the state comes first. And the people are expendable. Ruled by a single person. A charismatic leader. Who the people pledge their allegiance to. And follow obediently to the ends of the earth. We can learn a lot by studying what happened in Nazi Germany about the quest for absolute power. For though party ideology may differ the path to that party is eerily similar wherever, and whenever, you look.
Of course, some are infatuated by an all-powerful state. Not for the crimes against their people. But what an all-powerful state can do. Where enlightened individuals can do what’s best for the people without having to deal with a political opposition. Just read what one beloved world leader wrote about Adolf Hitler prior to the outbreak of hostilities that embroiled the world in World War II:
Other musings concern how great the autobahns were – ‘the best roads in the world’ – and how, having visited Hitler’s Bavarian holiday home in Berchtesgaden and the tea house built on top of the mountain for him.
He declared; ‘Who has visited these two places can easily imagine how Hitler will emerge from the hatred currently surrounding him to emerge in a few years as one of the most important personalities that ever lived.’
This was written just a few years before Hitler invaded Poland. Up until the war broke out there were many who admired the great things authoritative and charismatic leaders were doing. Mussolini made the trains run on time. And FDR was so smitten with Joseph Stalin and the great things he was doing in the Soviet Union that it broke his heart when the Soviets signed a non-aggression pact with the Nazis. Allowing the invasion of Poland. And starting World War II. While splitting up Poland between the Nazis and the communists. Basically removing Poland from the map.
The Left has used the Expanding Size of the Federal Government to Harass and Silence their Political Enemies
This is why Nazi Germany is so interesting as a study in politics. For the Nazis rose to power within the political process. They won elections. And then used their legitimate powers to expand their power. Often helped by the clever use of propaganda. Misinformation. And brutal criminal acts. Which becomes easier to do as your powers grow. And you place yourself above the law. And become a nation of a charismatic ruler. Instead of a nation of laws.
With the recent scandals of the Obama administration (Benghazi, the obstruction of free speech, the persecution of conservatives, etc.) some are making comparisons to Watergate. While some even go so far as to compare it to Nazi Germany. Of course, President Obama and the Democrats are NOT Nazis. In fact, they are diametrically opposed to much Nazi ideology. Just to give one example take immigration. The Nazis believed in a pure Germanic race and opposed immigration of non-Germans. While Democrats want to throw open the borders. So the left are not Nazis. But if you read the 25 points of the Nazi Party platform of 1920 you will see that the left employs many of the same tools to rise to power as the Nazis—and all totalitarian regimes—used in their rise to power. Here are some of the 25 points.
9. All citizens must have equal rights and obligations.
12. In consideration of the monstrous sacrifice in property and blood that each war demands of the people personal enrichment through a war must be designated as a crime against the people. Therefore we demand the total confiscation of all war profits.
13. We demand the nationalization of all (previous) associated industries (trusts).
15. We demand an expansion on a large scale of old age welfare.
16. We demand the creation of a healthy middle class and its conservation, immediate communalization of the great warehouses and their being leased at low cost to small firms, the utmost consideration of all small firms in contracts with the State, county or municipality.
18. We demand struggle without consideration against those whose activity is injurious to the general interest. Common national criminals, usurers, Schieber and so forth are to be punished with death, without consideration of confession or race.
20. The state is to be responsible for a fundamental reconstruction of our whole national education program, to enable every capable and industrious German to obtain higher education and subsequently introduction into leading positions. The plans of instruction of all educational institutions are to conform with the experiences of practical life. The comprehension of the concept of the State must be striven for by the school [Staatsbuergerkunde] as early as the beginning of understanding. We demand the education at the expense of the State of outstanding intellectually gifted children of poor parents without consideration of position or profession.
23. We demand legal opposition to known lies and their promulgation through the press. In order to enable the provision of a German press, we demand, that:
a. All writers and employees of the newspapers appearing in the German language be members of the race:
b. Non-German newspapers be required to have the express permission of the State to be published. They may not be printed in the German language:
c. Non-Germans are forbidden by law any financial interest in German publications, or any influence on them, and as punishment for violations the closing of such a publication as well as the immediate expulsion from the Reich of the non-German concerned. Publications which are counter to the general good are to be forbidden. We demand legal prosecution of artistic and literary forms which exert a destructive influence on our national life, and the closure of organizations opposing the above made demands.
25. For the execution of all of this we demand the formation of a strong central power in the Reich. Unlimited authority of the central parliament over the whole Reich and its organizations in general. The forming of state and profession chambers for the execution of the laws made by the Reich within the various states of the confederation. The leaders of the Party promise, if necessary by sacrificing their own lives, to support by the execution of the points set forth above without consideration.
Both the Nazis and the left call for an egalitarian society. For example, everyone should have access to health care. While everyone is obligated to pay their fair share (i.e., the health care mandate forcing people to buy health insurance). Both call war a crime against the people and want to confiscate war profits. Among other profits. The left wants to get rid of the profit incentive and capitalism while the Nazis wanted to just nationalize private sector industries. The Nazis wanted to get the elderly dependent on the state by expanding old age welfare. Just as the left does with Social Security and Medicare (and now Obamacare). The Nazis wanted to implement price controls to help the middle class. The left’s solution to the high cost of health care (in part) is price controls. Forcing doctors and hospitals to work for less. The Nazis wanted to severely punish those who are injurious to the state agenda. The left used the IRS and other agencies of the federal government to make life uncomfortable for those who actively oppose their agenda (case in point the recent scandals plaguing the Obama administration). The Nazis controlled education as “early as the beginning of understanding.” The left had the government take over the student loan program to get more kids into college where they can further indoctrinate them. The left controls public education. That gets out the vote to help Democrats win elections. And the left is always trying to create/expand state-run childcare. To start indoctrinating children as “early as the beginning of understanding.” The Nazis wanted to ban any free speech that did not help the general good. As the state determined what that general good was. The left marginalizes the one network (Fox) that doesn’t endorse the left’s agenda. They’ve tried to muzzle free speech on the one media outlet they did not dominate (talk radio) by trying to reinstate the Fairness Doctrine. And they’ve talked about extending that to the Internet to shut down any opposition there. The Nazis called for a strong central authority with unlimited powers to protect the general interest. The left has expanded the size of the federal government under the guise to protect the general interest. And the recent scandals show the use of that growing central authority to harass and silence their political enemies. Conservatives. Who are today’s scapegoat.
JFK was more Champion of the People than Seeker of Dictatorial Power unlike Today’s Democrat Party
The Nazi party did not do well until the Great Depression. When the masses were unemployed and suffering under the war reparations of the Versailles Treaty. The people were angry. Frustrated. And felt they were suffering for the crimes of others. Then along came Adolf Hitler. And the Nazi Party. They did not let this crisis go to waste. The Nazis identified a scapegoat for all of their woes. The Jews. With a great crisis and a scapegoat the Nazis started winning elections. In 1928 the Nazis had 12 seats in the Reichstag. By September of 1930, after the pain of the Great Depression was being felt, they had 107 seats. Making them the second largest party. At the same time the Hitler Youth junior branches started indoctrinating boys and girls as young as 10. By July 1932 the Nazis were the largest party in the Reichstag. The Nazis co-ruled the country as part of a coalition government. In 1933 the Reichstag burnt down. Another crisis too good to waste. The Nazis (who probably started that fire) blamed the Communist Party (KPD). The second largest party in the Reichstag. The Nazis got the KPD banned. Giving the Nazis majority rule. They then suspended basic civil rights. Because enemies of the people were everywhere. And the government needed to protect them. Making Germany a police state. The Civil Service law of 1933 began the removal of Jews from every office. The Nazis then abolished trade unions. Forcing everyone to join the German Labor Front. Then in March 1933 the government passed the Enabling Law. Transferring legislative power to Hitler’s cabinet. Creating Hitler’s dictatorship. As the future of Germany could no longer be left to the chaos of an elected body. It needed the strong will of a charismatic leader who knew what was best for the German people. And the German people followed his will obediently. Because there were enemies all around. And they needed someone unhindered by an elected body or law to protect them.
Liberal Democrats are NOT Nazis. They have more ideological difference than they share. But they do have one thing in common with the Nazis. Their quest for power. And in that quest for power they have used some of the same techniques the Nazis used. Because all power-hungry people use these techniques. They identify an enemy (Jews/conservatives). They champion the people. And then lie through their teeth. Using their growing powers to consolidate even more power. All the while the people enthusiastically support them. Supporting the oppression of their common enemy. Until that consolidated power begins to include them in their oppression. Where all but the most devout Nazis regretted their earlier support of the Nazi Party. As it was all but the most devout Nazis that suffered from the state’s oppression.
So who was that beloved world leader that wrote so admiringly of Adolf Hitler before the outbreak of World War II? He was an American. A Democrat. Who actually went on to fight in World War II. Against the Japanese. Who went on to become president of the United States. Fierce Cold War warrior. And, surprisingly, endorsed economic policies that Ronald Reagan would one day endorse. John Fitzgerald Kennedy (see How JFK secretly ADMIRED Hitler: Explosive book reveals former President’s praise for the Nazis as he travelled through Germany before Second World War posted 5/23/2013 on the Daily Mail). Who may have had some faults. But being a Nazi wasn’t one of them. JFK may have wanted to use the power of government to make America better. But he was an old school Democrat. Who was more champion of the people than seeker of dictatorial power. Unlike today. Where it appears the Democrats in power use the IRS and other agencies of the federal government to oppress their political enemies. Conservatives. Kind of the way the Nazis oppressed their political enemies in Germany. And like the communists oppressed their political enemies in East Germany. Where our fierce Cold War warrior spat in the face of that communist oppression by proclaiming, “Ich bin ein Berline.” I am a Berliner. But today it is the Democrats that are the oppressors. Not the ones fighting against oppression.
We’ve come a long way from JFK’s Democrat Party.
Tags: absolute power, Adolf Hitler, all-powerful state, authoritative, authoritative and charismatic leaders, champion of the people, charismatic leader, charismatic leaders, Communist, conservatives, consolidated power, crisis, Democrat Party, Democrats, dependent on the state, devout Nazis, dictatorial power, dictatorship, education, federal government, Great Depression, Hitler, IRS, Jews, JFK, KPD, Liberal Democrats, Nazi, Nazi Germany, Nazi Party, Obama administration, oppression, political enemies, political opposition, propaganda, public education, quest for power, Reichstag, scapegoat, the Left, totalitarian, totalitarianism, World War II, WWII
Whenever an Unscrupulous Politician would look over His or Her Shoulder a Journalist would be There
It took 8 years to formally end the American Revolutionary War. America was finally free from the arbitrary rule of a foreign government in a distant land. The states could now govern themselves. Without that distant government trying to tax them. Regulate them. Or oppress them. Which is why there was fierce opposition to the new federal government. Only 4 years had passed since the end of the war. Memories were fresh. They did not want to trade one distant oppressor for another. It took a Bill of Rights to finally ratify the new Constitution. And the very first amendment to the U.S. Constitution stated:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
In the First Amendment is the right of a free press. Allowing our news media to report everything that happens without fear of governmental retribution. Even if it pisses off those in government. Especially if it pisses off those in government. Just to let them know someone is watching them. To keep them honest. Transparent. To let the people know the second they try to exceed the bounds of their constitutional authority.
It’s a noble profession. Being the guardian of the people. To speak truth to power. To dare say that the king isn’t wearing any clothes. Standing up to the powerful to protect the people. Just like the Founding Fathers did. When they stood up to the world’s greatest superpower. The British Empire. And so would the free press. Who would not be intimidated by any government. No. They would get into their face. And be on them like ugly on a pig. For whenever an unscrupulous politician would look over his or her shoulder a journalist would be there. Ready to report to the people all of their unscrupulous deeds.
The Mainstream Media wrongly blamed Radical Conservatism for Boston, Newtown, Aurora and Tucson
And how is that brave and noble profession doing today? Don Henley wrote a song about it in 1982. Dirty Laundry. The title says a lot about how Henley felt about television journalism.
I make my living off the evening news
Just give me something-something I can use
People love it when you lose,
They love dirty laundry
Well, I coulda been an actor, but I wound up here
I just have to look good, I don’t have to be clear
Come and whisper in my ear
Give us dirty laundry
And little has changed since 1982. Television news loves it when people lose. And for these people reading the teleprompters on air nothing is better than when bad things happen to good people.
We got the bubble-headed-bleach-blonde who
Comes on at five
She can tell you ’bout the plane crash with a gleam
In her eye
It’s interesting when people die-
Give us dirty laundry
Unless those dead people are in Benghazi. Or their deaths can be traced to radical Islam. When they die for some reason it’s not interesting. When those bombs went off at the Boston Marathon the news media was all over the place. If you turned on a television there was someone standing somewhere in Boston telling us a lot of nothing. Because no one learned anything yet to tell. But they were offering up possible motives. It was in Boston. It was Patriots’ Day. Close to the anniversary of the fiery end of the siege at Waco. Close to the anniversary of the Oklahoma City bombing. And it was tax day. April 15. It could mean only one thing. The bomber had to be a radical conservative. Just like they blamed the Newtown, Aurora and Tucson shootings on before they knew any of the facts. But radical conservatives committed none of these crimes.
When they found out the bombers were a couple of radical Islamists, though, things changed. Especially when we learned one of them had traveled to Dagestan, a hotbed of radical Islam. Stayed there for 6 months. The Russians had even warned us about this guy becoming radicalized. Yet the FBI let him back into the country. Didn’t pursue him. And didn’t even tell the Boston police about him. So they might take a closer look at him or his Islamist anti-American YouTube playlist before a big public event like the Boston Marathon. Now the news hardly mentions these new developments. For once they ruled out radical conservatives as the culprits they lost that gleam in their eye.
Today the Mainstream Media is nothing more than the Propaganda Arm of a Distant Powerful Government
Not only has television news degenerated into cheap tabloid journalism it also has become partisan. Instead of speaking truth to power they have become an arm of the powerful. President Obama blamed our troubles with radical Islam on George W. Bush. Because he was mean. So President Obama was going to be nice. He changed the language to be kinder to Islam. So as not to offend our Muslim friends. When Nidal Hasan shouted “Allahu Akbar” like other radical Islamists do before they start killing innocent people President Obama called Hasan’s killing of 13 and wounding of 30 workplace violence. For the president refused to blame anything on radical Islam. In fact, after he killed Osama bin Laden he said the War on Terror was over. Al Qaeda was on ropes. And there were no more radical Islamists trying to kill Americans. This was the campaign message of the 2012 election. Osama bin Laden is dead. And General Motors is alive. Which the dutiful media reported without hesitation. Even though radical Islam had just killed 4 in Benghazi.
So in the president’s eyes there is no radical Islam. This is why the attack in Benghazi was a spontaneous uprising. By people who walk around with RPGs in their back pockets. Who were incited by a YouTube video. Not an al Qaeda attack. For the president won the War on Terror. So it couldn’t be al Qaeda. No. The Muslim world now loves us. Because George W. Bush is no longer president. But since President Obama has been in office radical Islamists have been trying to kill us. There was the underwear bomber. The Times Square bomber. And the Christmas tree lighting bomber. All plots that failed. Then there was Benghazi. And, of course, the Boston Marathon bombings. Proving that radical Islam is alive. And that they still hate Americans. No matter how much nicer President Obama is than President Bush. And now three whistleblowers are testifying before Congress about Benghazi. People who were there. And they contradict what the Obama administration has said. But other than Fox News no one is reporting this. Instead, they report more sensational tabloid news. While attacking and dismissing as partisan anyone that pursues the Benghazi story.
Dirty little secrets
Dirty little lies
We got our dirty little fingers in everybody’s pie
We love to cut you down to size
We love dirty laundry
We can do “The Innuendo”
We can dance and sing
When it’s said and done we haven’t told you a thing
We all know that crap is king
Give us dirty laundry!
Journalism was once an honored profession. But journalists today have sold out and gone over to the dark side. Instead of standing up to power they protect those in power. Case in point Benghazi. President Obama, Secretary Clinton and Secretary Rice blamed Benghazi on a spontaneous uprising in response to a YouTube video. That according to the people there had nothing to do with the terrorist assault on the American mission. So the Obama administration lied. Few believed the lie back in September. No one believes it now. Yet the media doesn’t investigate why the administration lied. Instead, they attack those who do and call them partisan. Protecting the government. Unwilling to report to the people a single unscrupulous deed government does. Unless the unscrupulous one is a Republican.
The mainstream media stopped being objective journalists long ago. And today is nothing more than the propaganda arm of a powerful government in a distant land. That stifles the free press. By cutting anyone down to size who dares to criticize the federal government. Entertaining us instead of informing us. And here we are, 8 months after Benghazi and they still haven’t told us a thing about that terrorist attack that killed 4 Americans.
Tags: Al Qaeda, American Revolutionary War, Benghazi, Boston marathon, conservative, dirty laundry, federal government, free press, George W. Bush, government in a distance land, Islamists, journalist, mainstream media, Osama bin Laden, partisan, President Obama, propaganda, radical conservative, radical Islam, radical Islamists, speaking truth to power, tabloid journalism, unscrupulous politician, War on Terror, YouTube video
The Mainstream Media sacrifice their Journalistic Integrity to help the Obama Administration Advance their Agenda
The president has warned that the $85 billion in spending cuts of the sequester will gut government programs leaving Americans at great peril. This despite baseline budgeting automatically increases spending every year. From 1974 (after Nixon decoupled the dollar from gold and the government adopted baseline budgeting) through 2008 (before the spending orgy of the Obama administration) federal spending increased approximately 7.5% each year. Crunching the numbers for the spending increase from 2012 to 2013 we get $284.7 billion. Applying the cuts of the sequester reduces this increase in spending to $199.7 billion. We will spend more in 2013 than we did in 2012. Even AFTER the sequester cuts. So all the peril the president is warning us about is not real. He’s lying for political gain.
Yet the mainstream media is discussing this issue as if there are real cuts in spending. That we will reduce spending in the numerous government programs the president warns about if we let the sequester happen. Less food inspection. Less airport security. Fewer police officers. Fewer firefighters. Fewer teachers. Fewer flu vaccinations. And less childcare. In their reports they discuss these as a matter of fact. When they are just not true. And it’s no secret. Anyone can do what we did and look at federal outlays and see the automatic spending increases each year. And see that we will still spend more in 2013 after the sequester cuts than we did in 2012. You’d think a journalist would study the facts. The historical record. And then question the president and his administration. Ask them why they are lying. But they don’t. Why?
Because they are partisan. Committed to the leftist agenda the president is trying to pass. So they either help spread the lie. Being complicit in the lie. Or they spread the lie because they are victims of the lie. They are so committed to the leftist agenda that they don’t question anything coming from the liberal left. Because they want to believe. They sacrifice their journalistic integrity to help the administration advance their agenda. More a propaganda arm of the administration than a free press. The kind of journalism they practice in Venezuela. Cuba. China. North Korea. And the kind of journalism they practiced in East Germany. The Soviet Union. And Nazi Germany. Where there was no free press. Only state propaganda. Propaganda in a totalitarian regime is one thing. They already oppress their people and their news is more for the benefit of outsiders. Where they lie about record harvests. And record gains in industrial production. Things their people have long stopped believing as they suffer through the misery of the reality. But it’s different in a free country. For it lends legitimacy for illegitimate actions of government. And allows them to overstep the restraints of their constitutional authority.
The Mainstream Media helped Downplay the Resurgent al Qaeda in Benghazi to help President Obama win Reelection
In 2010 the greatest cause of accidental deaths for children age 5-15 was motor vehicle accidents. In 2010 there were 806 deaths. Representing 49.1% of all deaths. The number two cause was drowning with 251 deaths. Or 15.3% of the total. Next came fire/burn at 135 deaths. Then death by suffocation at 79 deaths. Then death by other land transportation at 68 deaths. Then poisoning at 54 deaths. Then came firearms at 37 deaths. Yet many in the mainstream media actively support the Obama administration in their push for gun control. Especially a ban on assault weapons. Even if (as they say so often) it saves only one child. But guns aren’t the leading cause of death for children. In fact, as horrific as scenes like the Newtown shooting are they are very rare occurrences. Far more children die in automobile accidents each year. No doubt because we are driving smaller cars to save the planet (lighter cars means greater gas mileage and less pollution). But the journalists don’t report this fact. Because they endorse the leftist agenda of saving the planet. And more gun control. Even if saving the planet means the death of more children from driving in smaller and less safe cars. While more gun control probably won’t save a single child.
The Obama administration’s foreign policy record has been a poor one. The greatest threat to peace and stability in the Mideast and North Africa is Iran. Yet the Obama administration did not support the Green Revolution protesting the 2009 Iranian election results that most felt were unfair. There are few bigger enemies of the United States. The Iranian supported insurgency killed or wounded a lot of U.S. military in Iraq. Our strongest allies in the region (Israel, Egypt and Saudi Arabia) all feared growing Iranian influence in the region. But given an opportunity to support an uprising that could overthrow a great enemy to peace and stability the Obama administration did nothing. But when the Arab Spring swept through Egypt the president abandoned one of America’s most stalwart allies and the anchor to stability in the region. Hosni Mubarak. Now the Iranian influence in Egypt is stronger than ever. When the Arab Spring spread to Libya the Obama administration supported that movement, too. Despite Colonel Muammar Gaddafi having denounced terrorism and supported the Americans in the war against al Qaeda. When the Arab Spring spread to Syria the president did not support that protest. Despite Syria being Iran’s strongest ally in the region. A sponsor of terrorism. And a nation with a chemical arsenal likely manufactured by Iraq (those weapons of mass destruction that Saddam Hussein had used on his people but had disappeared when the Americans arrived on the scene, likely having skedaddled across the border into Syria). As bad as the ruling regime was in Syria we did nothing to help Syrians overthrow their oppressor.
Now civil war engulfs Syria. Elements of al Qaeda have joined the opposition. Making sure Iran wins however things turn out there. And the Iranian influence is stronger than ever in Libya. When al Qaeda killed the American diplomat in Benghazi the Obama administration made up a story about a YouTube video causing spontaneous protests that led to the ambassador’s death along with three other Americans. To downplay a resurgent al Qaeda during the 2012 election campaign. As they had refused to beef up security in Benghazi as the ambassador requested. Because it would look bad in the 2012 election. Yet the mainstream media did not question these very poor decisions the Obama administration made for political reasons. Instead accepting their position that there was nothing newsworthy in Benghazi. Which they wholeheartedly reported. Refusing to even ask questions. Such as why did they refuse the ambassador’s request for more security? Who edited the talking points for Ambassador Rice used for the Sunday morning shows? Or why is al Qaeda now stronger in the Middle East, North Africa and West Africa after 4 years of the Obama administration that they were during 8 years of the Bush administration? No. They showed no journalistic curiosity. Or integrity. Simply accepting the administration’s statements as fact. While the Middle East and Africa become more dangerous places.
The Mainstream Media is no longer a Free Press for the People but a Propaganda Arm of the Obama Administration
Obamacare is the most sweeping change to the American economy since LBJ’s Great Society. Which was the most sweeping change since FDR’s New Deal. The American Left has always wanted a national health care system. Just like what they have in the United Kingdom. The Left likes to point to their National Health Service (NHS) as the right way to do health care. As does the mainstream media. Yet if you read the British papers their NHS is not all the American Left says it is. Britain’s aging population has caused health care spending to explode. The UK is in the midst of massive budget cuts to bring down health care spending. While the NHS has long tried to deal with chronic problems of long wait times. Rationing. A shortage of doctors and nurses. Even ambulances. Their emergency rooms are overflowing with people with non-emergencies as the NHS closed their neighborhood clinics to reduce costs. And the quality of care has been falling in their hospitals. The problems in the NHS are no secret. All you have to do is pick up a British paper and read about them. For they are ongoing. Yet the mainstream media never reported these problems during the Obamacare debate. Or what passed for a debate. No. They never asked how Obamacare was going to avoid all the problems they were having in the NHS. Which they should have. As the US has an aging population, too. Worse, they have about five times the population the UK has. Guaranteeing any problems they have will be five times worse in the US. Serious questions a good journalist should have asked. But no. They didn’t. Because they support the liberal agenda more than they believe in journalistic integrity. So they only report what helps the administration. While avoiding anything that is critical of them. Or their agenda.
When it comes to economics the mainstream media are all supporters of Keynesian economics. Despite their record of failure. When Nixon decoupled the dollar from gold in 1971 it allowed the government to go all in with Keynesian economics. And they did. Printing so much money that it led to excessive inflation, high unemployment and economic stagnation. Ronald Reagan reversed those Keynesian policies. His administration stopped printing money. And got the government out of the private sector economy. Cutting regulations. As well as tax rates. And economic activity exploded. There was so much economic activity that tax revenue nearly doubled. Even at those lower tax rates. But the mainstream media doesn’t report this. Instead, they revise history. Always supporting Keynesian economic policies as they allow government to expand. So they can implement their leftist agenda. Which is anti-business. Pushing higher regulations. And higher taxes. And whenever anyone talks about Reaganomics they say those cuts in tax rates only increased the deficit. When the historical record clearly shows tax receipts increased. Which they could easily look up (see Table 2.1—RECEIPTS BY SOURCE: 1934–2017). But they don’t. Or chose not to. Preferring to support the liberal agenda. Instead of having journalistic integrity.
The mainstream media today is no longer a free press for the people. They are an extension of the Democrat Party. At least the liberal wing of the Democrat Party. More of a propaganda arm of the Obama administration. That is more interested in changing the country than keeping our politicians honest. Or reporting the facts. They are fiercely partisan. Or they are just not very smart. Either woefully ignorant of the material they report on. Or so in the bag for the Obama administration that they will report falsehoods as truth. The kind of thing that isn’t a big deal in a totalitarian regime. But a pretty big deal in a free country with a government that continues to try to exceed its constitutional authority. For a free press is the vanguard of a free country. Keeping the politicians honest so they can’t exceed their constitutional authority. And if the journalists aren’t going to do their job by the time we find out what our politicians are doing it will be too late. As we now have Obamacare as law. Which passed on partisan lines. With enough moderates and independents voting for Obamacare as few in America knew of all the problems the British were having with their national health care. Today it’s Obamacare. Tomorrow it may be gun control. Or a war in the Middle East thanks to a resurgent al Qaeda. And a growing Iranian influence. Thanks to such a poor job in foreign policy that if the mainstream media had reported it honestly President Obama may not have won reelection. And four Americans may not have died in Benghazi.
Tags: $85 billion, aging population, Al Qaeda, Arab Spring, baseline budgeting, Benghazi, Democrat Party, Egypt, federal outlays, federal spending, foreign policy, free country, free press, gun control, Iran, Iranian, Iranian influence, journalist, journalistic integrity, Keynesian, Keynesian economics, leftist agenda, liberal, liberal Left, Libya, mainstream media, Mideast, National health care, National Health Service, NHS, North Africa, Obama administration, Obamacare, partisan, politicians, President Obama, propaganda, propaganda arm, Reagan, save the planet, sequester, sequester cuts, tax rates, totalitarian regime
Week in Review
The mainstream media in America is more like the propaganda arm of the Chinese Communist Party than the Chinese journalists who risk their lives and careers to report the truth. The American media loves their president. And fawn over him in a cult of personality. Telling him things like, “Excellent job, Mr. President.” And, “How wise of you to say that, Mr. President.” And, “What a shame that YouTube video did to our consulate in Benghazi, Mr. President.” President Obama can do no wrong in their eyes. Something the Chinese Communists wish their media would be more like (see Former Beijing Publisher Honored For Resisting Censors by Sophia Fang posted 1/17/2013 on The Epoch Times).
Dai Zigeng, the publisher that was reported to have resigned recently after refusing to reprint state propaganda, was honored with the 2012 Most Influential Person award at a prominent Chinese media conference ceremony…
The censorship row against Southern Weekly, a liberal newspaper in southern China, was triggered when the Guangdong chief propaganda official Tuo Zhen altered the paper’s New Year’s edition to praise the Communist Party…
One of the regime’s mouthpiece media, the Global Times responded with an editorial titled “Southern Weekly issue prompts soul-searching over media’s role,” saying that the defiance displayed by Southern Weekly was incited by hostile foreign forces.
Dai was publisher of the Beijing News, a newspaper that was forced to reprint the Global Times’ attack. He refused, and resigned. The paper was made to print it anyway.
The Central Propaganda Department then commanded all municipal level newspapers to reprint the Global Times editorial. According to Hong Kong media Ming Pao, propaganda chief Li Qibao issued a “must print” mandate to newspapers that hadn’t reprinted the editorial. Standing Committee member of the Political Bureau of Chinese Communist Party, Liu Yunshan also reportedly helped with enforcement.
The U.S. doesn’t have a problem like this. As the mainstream media doesn’t need “must print” mandates. They are such sycophants of the Obama administration that they will write glowing pieces of propaganda without orders to do so. And they will self-censor themselves. They won’t report on anything that reflects poorly on the Obama administration. Just ask yourself where was the reporting on Fast and Furious? On Benghazi? When he told the Russian diplomat he will have more freedom to address Vladimir Putin’s concerns on American missile defenses after the election? Unless you caught it on Fox you probably didn’t hear about these things.
The mainstream media acts voluntarily like the propaganda arm of this administration. While Chinese journalists risk their lives and careers to maintain journalistic integrity. Something their counterparts in America know nothing about. Having sold their journalistic souls just so they can be part of the “In” crowd. So they can go to the best parties in Washington. And rub shoulders with the beautiful people. The rich and powerful. And the celebrities.
Tags: "must print" mandates, Beijing News, censorship, Chinese Communist, Chinese Communist Party, Chinese journalists, Dai Zigeng, journalists, mainstream media, propaganda, self-censor, Southern Weekly, state propaganda
Week in Review
The mainstream media has a liberal bias. They support liberal Democrats and their policies. They report favorably on liberal Democrats. And attack the conservative opposition. Liberals have benefitted nicely from this partnership with the mainstream media. Virtually having their own propaganda ministry. And they use it to advance a liberal agenda. They have tried to pass legislation like the Fairness Doctrine to muzzle Rush Limbaugh in particular and talk radio in general. They belittle Fox News and say it is a Right wing shill for simply not having a liberal bias. They hate the Tea Party and blame them for any obstruction of liberal policies in Congress. Some on the Left have even called for the rounding up and imprisoning of these ‘enemies of the state’ who oppose their liberal agenda. Pining for the days before the Internet, cable television and talk radio when they had full control of the only three news networks. Which is another reason why liberals love China (see Chinese protest outside newspaper gates in rare censorship demo by NBC News staff and wire reports posted 1/7/2013 on Behind the Wall on NBC News).
Scores of supporters of one of China’s most liberal newspapers demonstrated outside its headquarters on Monday in a rare protest against censorship, backing an unusual strike by journalists against interference by the provincial propaganda chief…
Negotiations between journalists and officials, whom the protesters held responsible for replacing a New Year’s letter to readers that called for a constitutional government with another piece lauding the party’s achievements, continued into the night, a senior journalist who asked not to be named told NBC News…
The protesters, most of them young, laid down small handwritten signs that said “freedom of expression is not a crime” and “Chinese people want freedom…”
The non-profit watchdog group Reporters without Borders ranked China at 174th out of 179 spots in its 2011-2012 press freedom index. The United States ranked 47th in the annual report, six rungs above Hong Kong, a former British colony which is administered separately from China’s mainland.
“China, which has more journalists, bloggers and cyber-dissidents in prison than any other country, stepped up its censorship and propaganda in 2011 and tightened its control of the Internet, particularly the blogosphere,” the group said in a report about the rankings.
What is the difference between liberals and conservatives? In this case liberals would have sympathies for the Chinese Communist Party. For they admire the Chinese way. Just as they admired the Soviet way. Where smart state planners ran the economy. And prevented any private business owners from getting rich. And these smart state planners even ran their personal lives. Doing things that were for their best interests. Because they were smarter than the people and knew what was best. Even if the people disagreed.
Conservatives, meanwhile, would have sympathies for the Chinese people. For they are simpatico with them. Facing the same assault on their liberties from an ‘enlightened’ ruling class. Albeit to a lesser degree than these Chinese lovers of liberty. So far.
Tags: American Left, conservative, Liberal Agenda, liberal bias, Liberal Democrats, liberals love China, mainstream media, propaganda, state planners
« Previous Entries