Thomas Jefferson wanted to keep the New Federal Government and Money Apart
Thomas Jefferson did not trust government. And he didn’t trust moneyed men. Because when the two come together they cause nothing but trouble. That’s why he hated and distrusted Alexander Hamilton. Hamilton wanted a strong central government. A central bank. And an economic system favoring merchants and bankers. With big city moneyed men financing the government in return for special favors.
This is why the nation’s capital isn’t in New York City. It once was. But one of the first deals the Hamilton and Jefferson camps made was the relocation of the nation’s capital to a mosquito-infested swamp on the Potomac River. A long, long way from the moneyed men in New York City. To try to keep the new federal government and money apart. To restrict the influence of the moneyed men on the government. And to prevent the government from having easy access to big money.
Why did Jefferson want to do this? Well, they fought for their independence from Great Britain. Which was a constitutional monarchy. Where some in Parliament were no friends of British America. And got the king to agree with them rather than the pro-British America faction in Parliament. Ironically, the Americans got help in their War of Independence from France. Which had an absolute monarchy. Whose king ruled with no check on his power. Both governments were in the big cities. London. And Paris. Where the moneyed men were. In the big cities. Allowing these monarchies to do a whole lot of mischief all around the world. And a fair amount of mischief inside their own countries. Because the money and the government were in the same city.
Government + Money = Corruption
Great Britain and France were forever at war with each other. And with other countries. Requiring a lot of money. Which they got from the moneyed men. In return for special privileges that allowed them to get ever richer. Of course the mischief grew greater as they fought a world war or two. Requiring ever more money. Which they got from, of course, taxing the rest of the people. Even those who could little afford it. And once this starts, once the government starts accumulating debt, that taxation will only get greater.
This is what Jefferson was worried about. And why he so distrusted Hamilton. The Founding Fathers were all gentlemen of the Enlightenment. Disinterested public servants. Honorable men who would never take advantage of their position in government for personal gain. Because for these men honor was everything. Some even fought duels to protect their honor. As Hamilton did. And died. Washington, Adams, Hamilton, Jefferson, Madison, Jay and Franklin were men of exceptional integrity. Men who could be trusted. But here is where Hamilton and Jefferson differed. Hamilton believed only men like them would ever enter government. While Jefferson believed that government service would one day attract mostly scoundrels and knaves.
Of course, Jefferson was right. For as the nation grew so did the size of government. And the need for great big piles of money. Which the moneyed men provided. In exchange for special privileges. Patronage. Lucrative government contracts. Etc. Big piles of money flowed into Washington. And favors flowed out from Washington. With many a politician getting rich in the process of getting rich moneyed men richer. Politicians who used their position in government for personal gain. Corrupted politicians. As government + money = corruption. Which is why politicians always leave office richer than when they entered office.
Power + Corruption = Tyranny
This is how it started. As the size of government grew corruption grew. Just as Jefferson feared. All that money flowing into Washington corrupted ever more politicians. Who were not gentlemen of the Enlightenment. But the scoundrels and knaves Jefferson knew would come. Who used their position in government for personal gain. Whose corruption grew so great it exploded federal spending. So great that taxes from the moneyed men AND the middle class were unable to fund it. So the taxation grew more aggressive.
The government created by the Founding Fathers had no income taxes. They funded the few things the new national government did with tariffs for the most part. People lived from day to day without any fear of the taxman. The United States even did away with debtors’ prison. Prison where people were sent who could not pay their debts. A relic of the 19th century. Sort of. For there is one debt people can still go to prison for not paying. Past-due taxes. For the IRS can take everything you have and imprison you if you don’t pay your taxes. And those taxes have grown great as of late. As the tax code has grown convoluted. Requiring businesses to hire armies of accountants and lawyers to comply with. So the government can help the moneyed men who help the government. In return for special privileges, of course. Leaving the masses dreading April 15. As they dread opening any letter from the IRS.
If you want to know what it was like living under an absolute monarchy just think of the IRS. People fear the IRS. Just as people feared the arbitrary power of an absolute monarchy. A king could take your property and lock you away. Just like the IRS. And if you spoke out against the monarchy the king could make your life really unpleasant. Just like the IRS. During the 2012 election the IRS targeted conservative political groups to stifle their free speech. Delayed their tax-exempt status approval. And harassed them with costly tax audits. And now their tyranny has extended to people in the middle class. Who unbeknownst to them had a family member owe the federal government. Years earlier. Even a generation earlier. And the IRS is arbitrarily seizing the tax refunds from these debtors’ distant relatives to pay these debts. Even though they are in no way responsible for these debts. And the government has no documentation for this debt. Doesn’t matter. Because they have the power to do this. And these people are powerless to stop them. Just like people living under an absolute monarchy were powerless to stop their king from doing anything to them. And this is what Jefferson feared. For after corruption comes tyranny. For power + corruption = tyranny. (Just look at every tin-pot dictator that has oppressed his people). Which is why people fear the IRS. And the federal government the IRS is beholden to. Because they have become everything Jefferson feared they would.
Tags: absolute monarchy, Alexander Hamilton, British America, central government, corruption, debt, Enlightenment, favors, federal government, Founding Fathers, France, gentlemen, Great Britain, Hamilton, honor, IRS, Jefferson, king, knaves, middle class, monarchy, money, moneyed men, Parliament, personal gain, politician, power, privileges, scoundrels, special favors, special privileges, tax refund, taxation, taxes, Thomas Jefferson, tyranny, Washington
Week in Review
We are continually told that there is a consensus among climate ‘scientists’ that global warming is real. And that man is causing it. It’s settled science they say. But have you ever wondered how real scientists do things? The kind that don’t take a vote on whether something is settled science? Here is a look into the world of theoretical physicists. A group of people that theorize about things far bigger than mere climate (see Physicists say Big Bang theory revelation may be premature by Liat Clark posted 3/25/2014 on Wired).
Three theoretical physicists have penned a paper suggesting last week’s announcement that cosmic ripples from the Big Bang have been identified may have been premature.
The Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics announcement rocked the scientific community with the revelation the South Pole BICEP2 telescope had captured twisted patterns in the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) left behind after the Big Bang. The Smithsonian team believes these are a glimpse of the gravitational waves that were generated by cosmic inflation — an epic distortion of space-time just after the Big Bang when the universe expanded in a trillionth of a trillionth of a trillionth of a second.
James Dent of the University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lawrence Krauss of Arizona State University and Harsh Mathur of the Case Western Reserve University have argued on the open access platform arxiv.org that the claim of definitive proof should not be made until all other possibilities have been ruled out.
Even after a paper has been published claiming definitive proof the subject is still open for debate. Now that’s science. And note that part about ruling out ALL OTHER possibilities. You never hear that kind of language from the climate ‘scientists’. Have they done that in their research? Or did they only look at selective data to prove what they want to prove? Did they rule out sunspot activity and the Pacific Decadal Oscillation? A warming of the oceans that shifts the jet stream? Or did they ignore this because it contradicts what they want the data to show? There is a correlation between the Pacific Decadal Oscillation and recent warming periods. Which would be one other possibility they need to rule out. But can’t. So they simply ignore it. Proving that ‘climate science’ is more politics than science. A tool for big-government leftists around the world to do what they’ve always wanted to do. To use the power of government to create a ruling class. Of a small group of people that has power over the masses. And who live quite comfortably while telling us what we must go without.
It’s nothing new. Since the dawn of time there have been those who seek power. To create a small ruling elite that lives better than everyone else. Much better. As every dictator in history has shown. North Korea still suffers from famine. But the ruling powers (currently Kim Jong-un) ate so well that they suffered from a little obesity. Kim Jong-un lives a privileged life. He has the best of everything while his people still go hungry. If that country were free, however, Kim Jong-un would live a less extravagant life. Perhaps even doing manual labor. For his only skill was having the right last name to become dictator.
This is why people want power. For even in the poorest countries those at the top live like kings. And those on the left, rabid anti-capitalists that they are, have no skill other than political skills. They want to live like kings. But they don’t want to work hard to earn it. So they use politics. Expand the size of government. To create as many high-paying posts that do nothing worthwhile as possible. So there is a place for these people. Where they can live better than everyone else without having earned it. This is why they want to nationalize health care. For that can create many levels of high-paying bureaucratic positions. And if they can get the economy of every country to bow down to their climate panels they can live better than kings. They can live as emperors. Over a vast empire they control. Living in the lap of luxury. Accumulating great wealth. And drunk on the power they can wield. Where they can get back at anyone that was ever better than them if they don’t bow down and kiss their fanny.
Tags: accumulate wealth, climate, climate science, climate scientists, consensus, dictator, Global Warming, Kim Jong Un, North Korea, Pacific Decadal Oscillation, politics, power, scientists, settled science, warming, wealth
Twice in little over One Century an Enemy Invaded and Overran Russia/the Soviet Union
On June 24, 1812, Napoleon’s Grande Armée invaded Russia. And made it all the way to Moscow. Which they took. But the Russian army didn’t want anything to do with Napoleon or his Grande Armée so they kept retreating in front of it. Foiling Napoleon’s plans of engaging and defeating the Russian army. While drawing them deeper and deeper into Russia. In a scorched earth retreat. Leaving nothing for the French. Making it difficult to feed his massive army. Then the bitter Russian winter came. Having expected the Russians to have sued for peace by then they had no winter clothing. Leaving Napoleon no choice but to retreat.
On June 22, 1941, Joseph Stalin’s ally, Adolf Hitler, broke the Treaty of Non-aggression between Germany and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. And invaded the Soviet Union. About one month later than planned due to some trouble their Italian allies were having in the Balkans. The Nazi armies advanced through the Soviet armies and reached Leningrad, Moscow and Stalingrad. Then the bitter Russian winter came. And like the French the Germans had no winter clothing. Having expected a victory before the onset of winter. They tried to hold their ground as they froze and starved. But the Soviets pushed them back. Eventually all the way to Berlin. But not after some 20 million Soviets died.
Twice in little over one century an enemy invaded and overran Russia/the Soviet Union. Never again vowed the Soviets. So when they chased the Nazis back into Berlin they kept the territory they were on after the war. Which is why Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, East Germany, Czechoslovakia, Bulgaria, Hungary, Romania and Albania became Soviet satellites. Countries behind the Iron Curtain. To provide a buffer to slow down another invasion before it reached Soviet soil.
For the Latter Part of the 20th Century the Soviets tried to extend their Communist Revolution to other Nations
Of course, following World War II it was the Soviets that had an expansionist policy. A little thing called the communist revolution. The assault on capitalism. Replacing it with socialism first. Then communism. And as revolutions go they are fought. With guns. So the communist revolution was a perpetual state of war interrupted with moments of peace. A war the Soviets forced onto their neighbors to get them to join them in their socialist/communist utopia. Something their neighbors didn’t want. And something their other neighbors, the Western Powers, would try to help them avoid.
The German capital, Berlin, fell in East Germany. Berlin, however, was a city divided between the Western Allies and the Soviet Union. The Western Allies supplied West Berlin via truck and rail transport. Until the Soviets closed the borders. In an effort to force West Berlin into the social utopia that was East Berlin. Something the West Berliners wanted no part of. So the Western Powers helped them by supplying the city via the Berlin Airlift. Eventually the Soviets relented. And opened the truck and rail transport into West Berlin.
The Soviets tried to spread their socialist utopia to other countries that didn’t want it. Greece. Turkey. Iran. South Korea. The United States and the Western Powers helped these countries resist these Soviet advances. Even fighting a shooting war on the Korean peninsula to push the Soviet and China backed North Korea out of South Korea. So through the remainder of the 20th century the Soviets tried to extend the communist revolution to other nations. While the United States tried to thwart their designs. And stared each other down with their nuclear weapons in the Cold War. Developing the doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD). Meaning that any country that started a nuclear war was going to lose, too, in that nuclear exchange. It was mutually assured but it really was a warning to the Soviets. Who had designs on conquering other nations. Including the United States. Who had no designs on waging war with the Soviet Union.
Geopolitics is about the Balance of Power
To balance the threat of the Soviet Union the Western Powers formed the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). For Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, etc., had no chance by themselves against an attacking Soviet Union. They did as a member of NATO, though. Where an attack on one was an attack on all. Which meant if the Soviets attacked the Low Countries they were also attacking France, the United Kingdom, Canada and the United States. The Americans even deployed armor units in West Germany. The Soviets replied with the Warsaw Pact. A NATO-like organization between the Soviet Union and some of those countries in Eastern Europe they never left after the end of World War II.
And there was peace. What we call the Pax Americana. The American peace. For it was the awesome might of the American military that gave NATO its teeth. With troops deployed around the world. Air forces stationed within striking distances of potential hotspots. The mightiest navy ever to ply the oceans. A huge nuclear arsenal. And the greatest economy in the world that could pay for all of this while the American people still lived a happy and carefree life with all of the comforts a capitalist society could give. Something the socialism/communism of the Soviet Union could not. For the people in the Soviet sphere waited for apartments, cars and groceries. Large extended families crowded into small apartments. And people waited in lines at stores with empty shelves. Which explains why the Soviets required a brutal secret police force. The KGB.
People in the Soviet sphere who learned of how much better life was in the West tried to escape to the West. This is why they built the Berlin Wall. Not to keep West Berliners from sneaking into that socialist utopia inside East Berlin. But to keep the East Berliners from escaping that socialist utopia. For the only way you can get people to live in that socialist/communist utopia is by force. And you have to spread the communist revolution not to make life better for people in capitalist societies. But to destroy that better life across the border from communist societies. To extinguish that beacon of liberty that keeps luring their people from their oppressive police state. Something Russia is returning to. As Vladimir Putin slowly but surely reassembles the Soviet Union. Not to reconstitute the buffer to protect Russia from another invasion. But simply because he wants to. And can. So far, at least.
Geopolitics is about the balance of power. Some like to maintain a balance of power to keep the peace. Like the Romans, the British and the Americans did with their Pax Romana, Pax Britannica and Pax Americana. Where the prevailing superpower kept the peace. While others are more interested in acquiring power than peace. Like Napoleon Bonaparte, Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin and Vladimir Putin. Who didn’t have strong economies. And used force to get what they wanted. Raw materials. Food. Or a warm water port in the Crimea. And they are always looking for a weakness in their enemies to alter the balance of power. For they were/are masters of geopolitics. And want to redraw the borders of the world. To restore the former glory of a past empire. Or to realize some glorious destiny they believe God has planned for the nation.
Tags: Adolf Hitler, balance of power, Berlin, Berlin Airlift, capitalism, Cold War, Communism, Communist, communist revolution, East Berlin, geopolitics, Germany, Grande Armée, Hitler, Iron Curtain, Joseph Stalin, Moscow, Napoleon, NATO, Nazi, nuclear, Pax Americana, police state, power, Putin, Russia, Russian winter, socialism, socialist, Socialist Utopia, Soviet, Soviet satellites, Soviet sphere, Soviet Union, Stalin, utopia, West Berlin, Western Allies, Western Powers
(Originally published April 1st, 2013)
Money would have No Value if People with Talent didn’t Create things of Value
Money is a temporary storage of wealth. We created it because of the high search costs of the barter system. It took a lot of time for two people to find each other who each had what the other wanted. And we started trading things to have things we couldn’t make efficiently for ourselves. Someone may have been a superb potter but was a horrible farmer. So, instead, the potter did what he did best. And traded the pottery he made for the things he wanted that he was not good at making. Or growing. Before that we were self-sufficient. Whatever you wanted you had to provide it yourself.
As we go back in time we learn why money is a temporary storage of wealth. For it was the final piece in a growing and prosperous economy. And at the beginning it was people with talent, each creating something of value. Something of value that they could trade for something else of value. It’s the creative talent of people that has value. And we see that value in the goods and/or services they make or provide. Money temporarily held that value. So we could carry it with us easier to go to market to trade with other talented and creative people. Who may not have wanted what we made or did. But would gladly take our money.
So we took our goods to market. People that wanted them traded for them. They traded money for our goods. Then we took that money and traded for what we wanted elsewhere in the market. Trade grew. With some people becoming professional traders. By trading money for goods from distant lands. Then trading these goods for money at the local market. People who didn’t spend time creating anything. But bought and sold the creative talent of others. Who were able to do that because of money. The creative talent came first. Then the goods. And then the money. For money is a temporary storage of wealth. Which has no value if no one is making anything of value. Because if you can’t buy anything what good is having money?
There were no more Gold Certificates in Circulation than there was Gold in the Vault to Exchange them For
These early traders used a variety of things for money. Pigs, tobacco, grain, oil, etc. What we call commodity money. Which was valuable by itself. As people consumed these commodities. Which is what gave them the ability to store value. But because we could consume these they did not make the best money. Also, they weren’t that portable. And not easy to make change with. Which is why we turned to specie. Such as gold and silver. Hard money. It was durable. Portable. Divisible. Fungible. For example, all Spanish dollars were the same while all pigs weren’t. One pig could weigh 30 pounds more than another. So pigs weren’t fungible. Or durable. Portable. And, though divisible, making change wasn’t easy.
So in time traders big and small turned to specie as the medium of exchange. For all the reasons noted above. If you worked hard to produce fine pottery you trusted in specie. You would accept specie for your pottery goods. Because you knew this hard money would hold its value. And you could use it in the future to buy what you wanted. No matter how long that may be. Why? Because the money supply remained relatively constant. As it took a lot of work and great expense to mine and refine ore to make specie out of it. So there was little inflation when using hard money. Which meant if you saved for a rainy day that hard money would be there for you.
Gold and silver could be heavy to carry around. Anyone struggling under the weight of their specie were targets for thieves. Who wanted that money. Without creating anything of value to bring to market. So we found a way to improve a little on using gold and silver. By locking our gold and silver in a vault. And carrying around receipts for our gold and silver to use as money. These gold certificates were promises to pay in gold. People could continue to use them as money. Or they could take these receipts back to the vault and exchange them for the gold inside. These gold certificates were as good as gold. And there were no more gold certificates in circulation than there was gold in the vault to exchange them for.
Governments Today use nothing but Paper Money because it gives them Privilege, Wealth and Power
Some saw advantages of expanding the money supply with paper currency. Money that isn’t backed by gold or any other asset. Money easy to print. And easy to borrow. Allowing rich people to borrow large sums of money to buy more assets. And get richer. Giving them more power. And if you were the one printing and loaning that money it gave you great wealth and power. So having a bank charter was a way to wealth and power. You could make it easy for those who can help you to borrow money. While making it difficult for those who oppose you to borrow money. So there were those in business and in government that liked un-backed paper money. Because a select few could borrow it cheaply and get rich and powerful.
While some liked these banks and that paper money there were others who bitterly opposed them. Some who didn’t like to see so much power in so few hands. And the hard money people. Who wanted a money that held its value. The common people. People who couldn’t borrow large sums of cheap money. But people who had to get by on less as the inflation from printing all those paper dollars raised prices. Leaving them with less purchasing power. Making it harder for them to get by. Often having to turn to the hated banks to borrow money. Again and again. Such that the interest on their loans consumed even more of their limited funds. Making life more tenuous. And more bitter between the classes. The rich who benefited from the cheap paper money. And the common people who paid the price of all that inflation.
Rich people, on the other hand, loved that inflation. It helped them make money. When they bought something at a lower price and sold it at a higher price they made a lot of money. The greater the inflation the greater the selling price. And the more profit. Also, the money they owed was easier to pay off with money that was worth less than when they borrowed it. Allowing rich people to get even richer. While the common people saw only higher prices. And the value of their meager savings lose value. So this cheap paper money fostered great class warfare. The hard money people hated the paper money people. Debtors hated creditors. The middling classes hated the large landowners, merchants, manufacturers and, of course, the bankers. And those who had talent to create things hated those who just made money with money. The greater the inflation the greater the divide between the people. And the greater wealth and power that select few acquired. This is what paper money gave you. Privilege. Which is why most governments today use nothing but paper money.
Tags: banks, barter system, class warfare, commodity money, creative talent, divisible, durable, fungible, gold, gold certificates, goods, hard money, inflation, market, medium of exchange, money, money supply, paper currency, paper money, people with talent, portable, power, privilege, purchasing power, search costs, silver, specie, talent, temporary storage of wealth, trade, traders, value, wealth, wealth and power
Slavery made the South more like an Old World Aristocracy than a New World Meritocracy
Democrats don’t like people of color. Never have. The Democrat Party’s lineage goes back to Thomas Jefferson’s Democratic-Republican Party. Thomas Jefferson was one of our Founding Fathers who, as the Democrats love to remind us, owned slaves. In fact, the Democratic-Republican Party was the party of the planter elite. And of slavery. While the opposition party, the Federalists, whose members included George Washington, John Adams and Alexander Hamilton, preferred manufacturing and commerce for the future of the United States. Not just plantations and slavery.
It was these southern planters who made the Three-Fifths Compromise necessary. Slaves couldn’t vote. So the North didn’t want to count them in determining the number of representatives a state had in the House of Representatives. The planter elite did not like this. As the anti-slave North had more free people and would end up controlling the government. Possibly passing anti-slave legislation. Well, without the southern states there would be no United States. So they compromised and counted some of their slaves. Giving the planter elite greater power in the new federal government than their population would otherwise have allowed. And to seal the deal they agreed not to discuss the issue of slavery again for 20 years.
The minority power in the South, the planter elite, who were Democratic-Republicans, brought a lot of slaves to the United States during that 20 year moratorium on the slavery issue. Swelling the slave population in the South. But once the 20 years were up Congress banned the slave trade. So from that point forward all slaves would have to be born on U.S. soil. But the minority power in the South had built their little fiefdoms by then. Owning large estates. With their lands worked by their large slaveholdings. Making the South more like an Old World aristocracy than a New World meritocracy. And the planter elite liked having so much power vested in so few of their hands. From having their few numbers control the federal government. To their absolute control of so many human lives on their plantations. They were an elite few. A superior people. And they liked it.
The South used the Power of the Federal Government to Suppress States’ Rights in the North with the Fugitive Slave Act
Over time as the north pursued the dreams of Washington, Adams and Hamilton immigration began to swell the population in the industrial North. Leading to the South losing their control over the House of Representatives. And threatening their elitism. By then the Democratic-Republican Party had become the Democrat Party. Which pushed to protect the institution of slavery. To protect their southern aristocracy. And their elevated status as a superior people. They used the power of the federal government where they could. Such as passing the Fugitive Slave Act to force free states against their will to return free blacks in their states to slavery. Then they argued that their states’ rights were at risk with all of the North’s abolition talk. Where the North might one day do what the South did to them. Use the federal government to force a state to do something against their will. Such as they did with the Fugitive Slave Act.
Their fight for the Senate led to further compromises to keep the union together while accommodating the planter elite. The Missouri Compromise (1820) had prohibited slavery in the new territory in the Louisiana Territory above approximately the southern border of Missouri (but permitted it within the borders of Missouri). Each state gets two senators. So with the House lost the Democrats needed more of the new states from the Louisiana Territory entered into the Union as slave states. Even those above the southern border of Missouri. Which they did with the Kansas–Nebraska Act. Which repealed the Missouri Compromise and replaced it with popular sovereignty. Where the people would chose whether they wanted to be a slave state or a free state. Setting off a mad rush by both sides to get to these territories so they could vote the slave status of these new states their way. Leading to a bloody civil war in Kansas.
Then another blow fell to the southern aristocracy. Abraham Lincoln. With the election of Republican Abraham Lincoln the southern aristocracy lost not only the House of Representatives but the presidency as well. Worse, the Republicans were an anti-slavery party. So even if they were somehow able to hold onto the Senate the Republicans in power would challenge the planter elite’s supremacy. Break up their fiefdoms. And challenge their power. Something this elite few were willing to fight to prevent. Well, they were willing to have others fight for them. To maintain the social order in the South. Leading to cries about states’ rights. And an over-powerful federal government. Despite their having used the power of the federal government to suppress states’ rights in the North with the Fugitive Slave Act.
Democrats see Benefits for Blacks as a Necessary Evil to keep them in Power
Most southerners were poor farmers. Who owned no slaves. Yet they rose to fight for states’ rights. And to protect the South from northern aggression. At least, that was what the planter elite had them believe. Who sent many of these poor farmers to their deaths in the American Civil War. When it was over approximately 8.6% of the South’s population was dead. By comparison World War II killed approximately 405,399 Americans. However, if we had suffered the same death rate as the South did in the American Civil War our World War II dead would have totaled over 12 million. This is what the southern aristocracy was willing to—and did—sacrifice to maintain their power and privilege. Their supremacy over other people. Especially over their black slaves.
Such a feeling of superiority allows you to do some pretty horrible things. Just review the history of Nazi Germany to see some of the atrocities a ‘master race’ can do. In the post-war South the Democrats did not lose with grace. They resented the martial law in the South after the war. And they hated Republican rule. Protecting their former slaves. Even allowing them to run for government office. It was all too much for the fallen southern aristocracy. To remind people of the proper order of southern society they formed the KKK. And unleashed a terror across the South. Killing their former slaves. And Republicans. To codify their white supremacy the Democrats turned to the legislature. And passed laws to segregate the ‘inferior blacks’ from their superior selves. Jim Crowe Laws. Separate but equal. With the emphasis on ‘separate’. In time pressure grew against the southern Democrats. But they held strong in Congress. Fighting against any civil rights legislation. Including the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Where Democrat Senator Robert Byrd (and former Exalted Cyclops of the KKK) filibustered against the Civil Rights Act for 14 hours and 13 minutes. To keep the blacks segregated from their superior selves.
Things are a lot better these days. But Democrat feelings of superiority die hard. Even though they would have us believe they like blacks today. Despite their past hatred of blacks. And their seething anger of having lost them from their plantations. But they found a way to ‘get them back on the plantation’. By making them dependent on government. In exchange for their vote. Which keeps them in power. Back where they believe they belong. And are entitled to be. Because they are a superior people. So benefits for blacks are a necessary evil to Democrats. For they still don’t like them. As evidenced by where they live. Where some of the richest Democrats (such as Nancy Pelosi) live in the whitest of neighborhoods. And their apparent racial purification of society. Through the guise of women’s rights. The most important thing to women, according to Democrats, is abortion. And they do their best to make abortion readily available. Especially to women of color. Like in New York City. And Mississippi. Where black women are having far more abortions than white women. Making America whiter. More like the neighborhood where Nancy Pelosi lives. And more like the color Democrats have fought to keep America since the Three-Fifths Compromise. The Fugitive Slave Act. Popular Sovereignty. The KKK. And Jim Crowe Laws.
Tags: abolition, abortion, Abraham Lincoln, American Civil War, aristocracy, blacks, civil rights, Democrat Party, Democratic-Republican Party, Democrats, elite, elite few, federal government, fiefdoms, Fugitive Slave Act, House of Representatives, Jim Crowe laws, Kansas, Kansas-Nebraska Act, KKK, Louisiana Territory, Missouri, Missouri Compromise, Nancy Pelosi, New World, North, Old World, plantation, planter elite, popular sovereignty, power, privilege, Republican, Senate, slavery, slaves, South, southern aristocracy, Southern Democrats, states' rights, superior, superiority, supremacy, Three-Fifths Compromise, white supremacy
We have Complex Numbers because there is no such thing as a Square-Root of a Negative Number
If we graph AC voltage and AC current we would see two sine waves. Graphs that rise from zero, reach a peak, fall back through zero, reach a nadir and then rise back up to zero. Which repeats over and over. And when we have voltage and current we get power. If we pick a point in time on our AC voltage and current graphs we can multiply the value for the current by the value of the voltage to arrive at a value for power. If these two sine waves are on top of each other we will get the highest value for power. If one graph moves ahead or behind the other (so we can see two sine waves instead of one) we will have a value less than the highest power.
Picture two capital ‘S’s lying on their side. So they look like one period of a sine wave. And one is on top of the other so we only see one. If we draw a vertical line through the highest point on these ‘sine waves’ both ‘S’s will have the same highest value. Let’s call that value ‘3’. Giving us a power of 9 (3 X 3). Now let’s move one ‘sine wave’ to the right. And look at that same vertical line. With the one ‘sine wave’ moved they won’t have the same value at that point. One will be less than the other. Because the maximum value for that ‘sine wave’ occurs to the right of the maximum value of the other. Let’s say the value for the moved ‘sine wave’ at that point is now 2. Giving us a power of 6 (2 X 3).
When the power and current are 100% in phase we get our maximum power. When they move out of phase we get a value of power less than the maximum. Even though the voltage and current waves are unchanged. The degree they are out of phase is called the phase angle. And it’s a problem for power companies. Because the typical electric meter only measures part of the power a customer uses. The real or active power. Not the reactive power. And it’s a combination of the active and reactive power that gives us apparent power. What the power companies produce. In the ideal world (where the voltage and current sine waves are on top of each other perfectly in phase) reactive power is zero and apparent power equals active power. Mathematically we express this with complex numbers. Where there is a real part (the active part). And an imaginary part (the reactive part). Where i2 = -1. Something that can’t happen in the realm of real numbers. As there is no such thing as a square-root of a negative number. But it is this use of imaginary numbers that let’s engineers build the world around us.
Criminalizing Cigarette Smoking plus Decriminalizing Marijuana Smoking Equals more Democrat Votes
Complicated, yes? Few of us understand this. But that’s okay. We don’t have to. Engineers are very smart people that can do remarkable things mathematically to model and build our world. And when they do that world is a better place. Which is all most of us care about. So imaginary numbers may be a foreign concept to most. But they provide a very ordered and sensical world. Unlike other imaginary things. Like unicorns. Fairies. And imaginary logic.
Liberals are high practitioners of imaginary logic. On its face it seems like gibberish. Illogical. And nonsensical. But like complex numbers it’s the combination of these nonsensical parts that serve to advance an agenda. For example, in their ideal world everyone would abort an unplanned and/or unwanted child. While also saying that same-sex couples should be able to adopt and raise children. But how can a same-sex couple adopt a child if no unplanned or unwanted child is given up for adoption? Having both of these positions is like the square-root of a negative number. It’s just impossible. Unless you enter the world of imaginary logic. Where unfettered abortion plus same-sex adoption equals more Democrat votes.
Liberals have banned cigarette smoking wherever they could. First there were no smoking sections in restaurants. Then they banned smoking entirely from restaurants. Once upon a time people could smoke in the workplace. Then they forced them into smoking lounges. Then outside of the building. And finally a minimum distance away from the doorway. Because smoking will kill you. The people around you breathing in second-hand smoke. And the people breathing in the stink you leave behind after smoking (third-hand smoke). Smoke in the lungs is the number one killer in America. It is so horrible that no one should be able to smoke. No one should be able to advertise smoking. Even the cigarette packages shouldn’t be pretty as that may entice kids to start smoking. But liberals have no problem with people smoking unfiltered marijuana cigarettes. With marijuana they take the exact opposite position than they do with cigarettes. Go ahead and smoke. You aren’t hurting anyone. Having both of these positions is like the square-root of a negative number. It’s just impossible. Unless you enter the world of imaginary logic. Where criminalizing cigarette smoking plus decriminalizing marijuana smoking equals more Democrat votes.
Hollywood Liberals hate Cigarettes and Guns but love them in their Movies
Hollywood movie producer Harvey Weinstein recently said on the Howard Stern radio show that he hates the National Rifle Association (NRA). And is going to make a movie to destroy them. For he thinks guns in America are a horrible thing. He hates them. And hates people having them. But he loves them when they are in his movies. And has become quite wealthy glorifying horrific gun violence. If you are unfamiliar with some of the movies he produced you can look them up on IMDB. Here are just a few that are filled with over the top and very graphic gun violence (as well as sword violence, knife violence, blunt force violence, etc.). Django Unchained (2012). Grindhouse (2007). Kill Bill: Vol. 1 (2003). Gangs of New York (2002). Pulp Fiction (1994). True Romance (1993). To name a few. This is how the View content advisory under Violence and Gore begins for Django Unchained: “Note that most of the violence in this film are [sic] over the top and very graphic.”
Harvey Weinstein is a liberal Democrat. Who believes the only reason why people are using guns to shoot a lot of people is because those guns are for sale. Cigarette ads and pretty packaging will entice kids to start smoking. But showing wholesale violence like in his movies would never encourage a kid to pick up a gun? For that matter, the next time you see one of these movies note how many people smoke in them (or see Alcohol/Drugs/ Smoking under View content advisory on IMDB). Having Joe Camel on a cigarette package is going to get a kid to start smoking but seeing his or her favorite movie star smoking—and making smoking look so cool—isn’t? Of course it is. Far more than any cigarette ad is. Just as the vicious gun violence in these movies is desensitizing some kids to gun violence. And is the reason why young kids are having pretend gun fights at school. Not because they are card-carrying members of the NRA. But because they saw it in a movie.
Liberals believe cigarettes and guns are horrible things. And no one should touch them. But liberal movie producers fill their movies with cigarettes and guns. Because they are so cool and fun to watch. Having both of these positions is like the square-root of a negative number. It’s just impossible. Unless you enter the world of imaginary logic. Where criminalizing cigarette smoking and gun ownership plus glorifying cigarette smoking and vicious gun violence (and sex and drugs) in the movies equals more Democrat votes. Which is what imaginary logic is all about. Democrat votes. Which is why liberals can have conflicting positions on the same subject. Because they don’t really care about the subject. Or the people they harm. They just want the power that comes with getting people to vote Democrat.
Tags: abortion, active power, adoption, apparent power, cigarette, cigarette smoking, complex numbers, current, Democrat, Democrat votes, gun violence, guns, Harvey Weinstein, imaginary, imaginary logic, imaginary numbers, liberal, marijuana, NRA, phase, power, reactive power, sine wave, smoking, voltage
Democrats lie because they have a Track Record of doing things Poorly
Democrats lie. They have to. Because they want power. And they have no good reason for accumulating it. They lied about Obamacare to pass it into law. With the top Democrat telling the biggest lie of 2013. President Obama. “If you like your insurance plan you can keep it. Period.” They lied because they want the power to control one-sixth of the U.S. economy. Even if they reduce the quality of health care. Which they will. So they can spend the ensuing years demanding more money (i.e., higher taxes) to fix Obamacare.
They blamed the killing of 4 Americans including our ambassador in Benghazi on a YouTube video. Even the left-leaning (it leans so far left it has actually fallen over) New York Times is rehashing this story. Saying it was a spontaneous uprising over that YouTube video that had nothing to do with al Qaeda. Despite using military armaments like rocket propelled grenades and pre-sighted motors. Things crowds don’t typically have on them to commit spontaneous mischief. But President Obama’s 2012 campaign claimed that President Obama had al Qaeda reeling. And just couldn’t let the American people know that they were negligent in protecting Americans in Benghazi. Which was so dangerous that the British had pulled out before the anniversary of 9/11. But they still denied Ambassador Stevens’ request for more security. Despite the anniversary of 9/11 being around the corner. Because it wouldn’t look good during a campaign that claimed to have al Qaeda reeling.
So Democrats lie. Because they have a track record of doing things poorly. Preventing them from saying “let us do this and that and the other thing because we have a great track record of doing this and that and the other thing.” When in fact their track record is so poor that no one would ask them to do more so we can enjoy more failure. So they lie. To expand the size of government. So they can reach out and strangle the private sector. Such as with their lies about global warming that raised the cost of heating our homes. As well as to light our homes. Making the incandescent light bulb now illegal. Forcing us to use more costly lower wattage lamps. Compact fluorescents. And LEDs. So we use less energy. And put less carbon into the atmosphere. Because manmade global warming is killing us.
You can irrigate a Desert and grow Grass but you can’t grow Grass where Ice and Snow cover the Soil
One of the iconic images of the American Revolutionary War is our troops freezing at Valley Forge. The winter was brutal. And for good reason. It was part of the Little Ice Age. A period of cooling from approximately 1350 to about 1850. Where temperatures fell. Making the winters colder. Longer. And snowier. Rivers and harbors froze that don’t freeze today. Glaciers destroyed mountain top villages. And the shorter and wetter growing seasons caused famines in many countries. Famines in France, Norway and Sweden killed about 10% of their populations. Famines in Estonia and Finland killed more.
A cooling climate is dangerous. It shortens the growing season. Leaving people hungry, malnourished and sickly. For you need sun, warmth and moist soil (not mud) through many months to grow food. If you don’t you have poor harvests. Providing less food for the people to eat. And less forage to sustain livestock over the winter. Which reduces the food supply during the winter further. Giving you famines. Like those in the Little Ice Age.
Dubai is a city in a desert. From May through September they get less than one inch of rain each month. The average high in July is 105.4 degrees. The average high in January is 75.2 degrees. The average annual humidity is 59.8%. So Dubai is hot and dry. A city of buildings and sand. But you know what else Dubai has? Lush, green, championship golf courses. Something Greenland doesn’t have. Because you can irrigate a desert and grow grass. But you can’t grow grass where ice and snow cover the soil. And the same holds true for food. Making a cooling climate far more dangerous than a warming climate. As those valiant soldiers at Valley Forge could have attested to.
Because of Global Warming Dr. David Viner said in 2000, “Children just aren’t going to know what snow is.”
The global warming alarmists have been warning that the polar ice caps are melting. And the poor polar bears have no ice to rest on. Soon the ice will all melt and flood our coastal regions. They say this even today. Interestingly, a ship is retracing the steps of Australian explorer Douglas Mawson in the Antarctic. Whose expedition suffered horribly during the winter months there about a century earlier. The current expedition is aboard the MV Akademik Shokalski. Which has been stuck in the ice since Christmas Eve. And this during the summer months in the Antarctic.
Noted climate ‘scientist’ at the University of East Anglia, Dr. David Viner, said in 2000 that because of global warming “Children just aren’t going to know what snow is.” Currently, the eighth winter storm this year, Winter Storm Hercules, is dumping over a foot of snow from Buffalo to Boston. With blizzard warnings for Cape Cod and Long Island. And bitter cold Arctic air will follow the snow. About as bad as it was at Valley Forge. With another winter storm following Winter Storm Hercules. Funny. Here we are almost 14 years later and there is still snow. Proving how wrong the global warming alarmists have been.
Still, the global warming alarmists say we must fight global warming. To allow the climate to cool. Even though history has shown that a cooling climate leads to hunger, malnourishment and sickness. And famine. But the left fights for those things. Why? Because there ain’t a damn thing you can do with regulations to warm the planet. But if you paint manmade global warming as the villain you can blame carbon. And regulate the hell out of the economy. And that’s something they will never let go of. Hence their lying. Because they just don’t want to give up the power that allowed them to make the incandescent light bulb illegal.
Tags: Al Qaeda, al Qaeda reeling, anniversary of 9/11, Benghazi, Carbon, climate, cooling, Democrats, Democrats lie, Dr. David Viner, Dubai, famine, food, Global Warming, global warming alarmists, growing season, incandescent light bulb, lie, little ice age, manmade global warming, Obamacare, polar ice caps, power, President Obama, Valley Forge, warming, winter storm, YouTube video
The Pope kept European Rulers from Oppressing their People lest they get Excommunicated from the Church
In 39 AD the Romans crucified Jesus of Nazareth. Because they said he called himself the King of the Jews. Or rather those with political power who felt threatened by Jesus’ popularity said this. His death was to protect power and privilege of those who had it. Ultimately, though, His death would do more to destroy power and privilege. For the Golden Rule allowed people to live together in peace. To build communities. And to help one another.
Emperor Diocletian split up the vast Roman Empire into four parts. The tetrarchy. The rulership by four. Each of the four parts had its own emperor. When Diocletian stepped down from power those emperors began vying for power. By 312 two emperors were in open war with each other. Constantine. And Maxentius. On October 28, 312, they met in battle near the Milvian Bridge over the Tiber. On the eve of battle Constantine had a vision. The Christian God would help him win the upcoming battle if he placed the Christian symbol on his soldiers’ shields (accounts differ it was either the Chi-Rho sign or the Latin cross). He did. He won. And became Constantine the Great. Sole ruler of the Roman Empire. And because of his victory in the Battle of the Milvian Bridge he began his conversion to Christianity. Making the Roman Empire Christian.
Christianity spread throughout and united Europe. And the Pope kept European rulers from oppressing their people. Lest they get excommunicated from the Church. In time, though, some resented rule from Rome. In particular when Pope Leo X sold indulgences (a way to help purify one from sin) to fund the rebuilding of St. Peter’s Basilica in Rome. This was one of many problems that had many calling for a reform of the Church. One in particular, Martin Luther, published his The Ninety-Five Theses in 1517. Kicking off the Protestant Reformation.
Plymouth Colony succeeded when Communal Property became Private Property
Henry VIII, King of England, was a good Catholic. But his wife wasn’t giving him any sons. And he wanted a male heir. So he asked the Pope for an annulment from his wife. Catherine. So he could marry Anne Boleyn. The Pope refused. So Henry left the Catholic Church. And initiated the English Reformation. Making England Protestant. England would swing back and forth between Catholicism and Protestantism without being either but something in between. Making a group of Protestants very unhappy. As they felt the English Reformation did not go far enough. A group referred to derisively as Puritans. They were so hated that they were being persecuted along with the Catholics. So they left England. Landing in the Netherlands first. Then they sailed across the Atlantic. They sighted land on November 9, 1620. They eventually came ashore and established Plymouth Colony.
About half of Plymouth Colony died within the first few years. From disease. And hunger. The economic system they were using was killing them. Communal property. Everything the colonists produced belonged to everyone. People produced according to their ability and took from the common store according to their needs. A sort of Marxism. Before there was even a Karl Marx. To save the colony Governor William Bradford abandoned the idea of communal property in 1623. Communal property became private property. And the colony was saved. As people worked twice as hard to produce more on their land than they did on communal land. And because they did they replaced famines with bumper crops. So instead of dying off the American colonies became the prosperous New World.
The Seven Years’ War (1756–1763) came to the New World. By the time it ended Catholic France lost its North American possessions to Protestant Great Britain. To pay off the enormous debt of that war Parliament decided to tax their British American colonists. Who made out very well in the conflict without the costs the British incurred. But they did this without discussing it with the colonists. Treating them as second-class citizens in the British Empire. Who had no representation in Parliament. Which led to anger over taxation without representation. Leading to the Boston Tea Party (December 16, 1773). Which led to the Intolerable Acts and the Quebec Act (1774-1775). Which led to the shot heard ’round the world. The Battles of Lexington and Concord (April 19, 1775). Which ultimately led to July 2, 1776. When the Continental Congress voted to adopt the Declaration of Independence. After a few revisions it was formally passed 2 days later. On July 4, 1776. Known forever after as Independence Day in the United States.
In the United States your Last Name does not Determine the Quality of your Life
The American Revolutionary War did not start out well. As the British pushed them back with little effort. Until Benedict Arnold (future traitor) did some superb soldiering. Impeding the advance of General Burgoyne. The Americans met him in battle for the last time on October 7, 1777. On the second day of fighting in the Battle of Saratoga. And won. Forcing an army in the mightiest empire in the world to surrender. Shocking the world. And getting the French to take notice. Who then entered the American War of Independence. The turning point of the war. And world history. For France was anxious to get back what they had lost to the British. As was Spain. Who joined the conflict as France’s ally. Turning the American War of Independence into a world war. And a war of attrition. As their new foes forced them to send British forces all around the globe. Leaving fewer to fight in North America. With a British public growing weary of the war in North America.
America won. Eventually. Taking 8 years until the Treaty of Paris officially ended the conflict (September 3, 1783). And peace and prosperity followed. Thanks in large part to Jay’s Treaty (ratified by the Senate in November 1794). Which improved relations between Great Britain and the new United States of America. And began a Special Relationship between two nations of a common people, culture, religion and tradition. When the treaty expired there was a minor hiccup in that Special Relationship that resulted in war. The War of 1812 (1812-1815). But peace and prosperity soon resumed. With the South having a larger say in the national direction thanks to the Three-Fifths Compromise in the United States Constitution (1787). Giving the South greater representation in the House of Representatives as they counted 3/5 of each slave to determine their number of representatives. As the North industrialized and immigration filled their factories and swelled her population the South was losing that larger say. One thing led to another that eventually resulted in the American Civil War (1861-1865).
The agrarian South had more in common with feudal England than they did with the industrial North. Rich landowners (the planter elite) comprised an aristocracy that controlled politics. While peasants/slaves worked the land. The South was holding onto the Old World. Where there was power and privilege. While the North was building the New World. Though the South talked about states’ rights they used the power of the federal government wherever they could. Such as the Fugitive Slave Act (1850). When war broke out the South won most battles. Until General Grant started his great advance down the Mississippi River. With the Vicksburg Campaign (May 18 – July 4, 1863) culminating in the capture of Vicksburg. And control of the Mississippi River. Severing the Confederacy into two. Pretty much guaranteeing a Union victory. It was just a matter of time. In the east the Battle of Gettysburg (July 1–3, 1863) also ended in a Union victory. President Lincoln went to the Gettysburg battlefield for the dedication of the Soldiers’ National Cemetery there. Where he gave his Gettysburg’s Address (November 19, 1863). Which ended with “we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain—that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom—and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.” And so far it hasn’t. Remaining that shining city upon a hill. The destination of people everywhere yearning liberty. And a better life. Where all men are created equal. And your last name does not determine the quality of your life.
Tags: British Empire, Catholic, Christian, Christianity, Church, communal property, Constantine, Declaration of Independence, Diocletian, England, English Reformation, France, Gettysburg, Great Britain, Jesus, Marx, Milvian Bridge, New World, North, Old World, Parliament, Plymouth Colony, Pope, power, private property, privilege, Protestant, Reformation, Revolutionary War, Roman Empire, Romans, Rome, South, Special Relationship, Vicksburg
Week in Review
Large governments like to control their economies. And their people. Because those in power always want one thing. More power.
The United States became the world’s number one economic power before the federal government grew into the thing it is today. Way too big. Reaching way too far into the private sector economy. Before Keynesian economics became all the rage to empower the growth of governments there was classical economics. With simple principles. Thrift. People thought long-term and saved their money instead of buying everything they wanted today. Banks collected their savings and transformed them into investment capital. The more people saved (i.e., the thriftier they were) the more capital there was available to loan to entrepreneurs. Thus lowering interest rates. There was also sound money. Backed by gold. In various forms of the gold standard. That held the value of money over time. And the federal government taxed little. Regulated little. And spent little. These classical economic principles stimulated strong economic growth. (Principles similar to the Austrian school of economics championed by Friedrich Hayek.) And it is these principles that we have moved away from as we turned to Keynesian economics. And a form of state-capitalism that we have today.
During the Nineties China turned to classical economic principles. As they slowly allowed people some economic liberty. But just a taste of it. For the ruling Chinese communists did not want what happened during the collapse of the Soviet Union to happen in China. The Chinese Communist Party would not collapse like it did in the former Soviet Union. While there were free thinkers that embraced the principles of Friedrich Hayek the state kept them on a short leash. A leash that appears to be even shorter these days (see A Lonely Passion: China’s Followers of Friedrich A. Hayek by DIDI KIRSTEN TATLOW published 10/30/2013 on The New York Times).
Hayek believed that economic planning by the state leads to a loss of individual liberty, and that a private economy run by people whose rights are protected and enlarged by good laws delivers the best life.
‘‘There is some distance between Hayek and the current realities’’ in China, Gao Quanxi, a prominent Chinese Hayekian and law professor at Beihang University in Beijing, said in an interview this week.
Mr. Gao was probably choosing his words carefully. The gap is enormous, as he explained last Friday in a talk at the Unirule Institute of Economics, a think tank in Beijing…
In his talk, titled ‘‘Reconsidering Hayek’s Theoretical Legacy,’’ Mr. Gao did not mince words: China is less free now than 10 years ago, at the end of the Jiang Zemin era. There is no ‘‘free market of ideas’’ in universities. Publishing on topics the authorities disapprove of has become more difficult. The state is on the march…
Capitalism, several participants said, functions in China according to the unwritten rules created by the power holders, not by good laws, as Hayek urged.
‘‘Communism has failed. Socialism has failed. What we have here is statism. And Hayek really opposed that. So how should we understand Hayek in the context of today’s China?’’ asked Mr. Gao…
Many economists, scholars and politicians believe that China is facing deep challenges to its economic model, that it needs to shift from a fixed investment-fueled economy, where the hand of the state is heavy, to one with more private enterprise and market forces.
President Obama and the Chinese communists share something in common. They both are trying to move their economies in the same direction. Only the Chinese communists don’t publicly bash capitalism as much as President Obama and his fellow Democrats do.
When China was enjoying double digit GDP growth the liberals in the United States wanted to do what the Chinese were doing. To manage the economy more. As they thought they were even more brilliant than communist state planners in China. And could even outperform the Chinese economy. If they could only control it. Decide what we make. Like solar panels. And electric cars. Of course, most of China’s economic growth produced exports. And they sold well because of China’s low wages. Which is pretty much all they had going for them. Their middle class did not grow. And with the worldwide decline in economic activity thanks to Keynesian economic policies by state planners everywhere who think they are smarter than the market their export market cooled. As it cooled so did their GDP growth.
China is suffering a little economic malaise now because they don’t have a thriving middle class of entrepreneurs starting small businesses. All they have are large state-run factories. That produce exports. Because they don’t have a thriving middle class to buy these products. Which is what happens when you don’t have individual liberty. Friedrich Hayek understood this. Pity the Chinese communists don’t. Or President Obama and his fellow Democrats. Then again, perhaps they do. But they know the price of individual liberty is less government power. And that’s just something anathema to communists. President Obama. And Democrats.
Tags: Austrian school of economics, capital, capitalism, China, Chinese communists, classical economics, Democrats, economic liberty, entrepreneurs, Friedrich Hayek, gold, Hayek, individual liberty, investment capital, Keynesian economics, middle class, money, power, President Obama, savings, Soviet Union, thrift
Nazis and Communists acquired Power by Promising their People a Generous Welfare State
Adolf Hitler did not tell the German people that he wanted to wage world war. Install an oppressive police state. Or commit genocide. Joseph Stalin did not tell the Russian people that he wanted to install an oppressive police state. Starve millions of his people to death. Or export communist revolution around the world. Fidel Castro did not tell the Cuban people that he would make life so unbearable for them that they would rather risk dying in the ocean to reach America than staying in Cuba.
These dictators did not say these things. And if anyone ever asked them of their true intentions they lied. Especially to their people. They lied about wanting to brutally oppress their people so they could expand their power. Instead they told them they were going to take care of the people. Unlike the evil capitalists. Hitler’s National Socialism was going to give the people everything they could possibly want. A job. Mandatory vacations. And national health care. A person would be a fool not to want to give Hitler more power as he was going to make their lives so much better. Freer. And more pleasant. Like a welfare state is supposed to be.
The communist promised that there would be no bourgeoisies exploiting the working man. Instead everyone would be equal. A utopia where everyone was each other’s brother. Or comrade. There would be no private property. The people would own everything. And there would be national health care. This is the communist utopia Stalin promised his people. And what Castro promised his people. Neither meant it. As no communist dictator meant it. But by promising the people these things they were able to acquire power. And the more power they acquired the more the people suffered. This is why dictators and dictator wannabes lie. To get the people to give them things the people would never give them if they told the truth.
The Affordable Care Act is a Pathway to the Soft Tyranny of National Health Care
The American left has always wanted the Holy Grail of the socialist state. National health care. For it gives them massive power. As a person’s health is the most important thing in their life. And once dependent on the state for their health care there is no new tax they won’t approve. If it’s for their health. This is why the left wants national health care. This is why all dictators give their people national health care. It makes people dependent on government. And it makes people fear their government. For if the government doesn’t get what it wants they could withhold health care. Which could result in their death.
Now the Hitlers, Stalins and the Castros of the world don’t need to withhold health care to kill their people. Their people feared them because they know their leaders could kill them outright. The kind of thing that just doesn’t happen in Western democracies. Which is what makes national health care so attractive. For it offers a soft tyranny. For you heard the left’s dire predictions of what would happen if the Republicans shut down the government. But national health care? Imagine the fear they could put into the people the next time the Republicans talked about tax cuts.
The Affordable Care Act (i.e., Obamacare) is a pathway to this soft tyranny. National health care. While Canada and the United Kingdom struggle under the weight of their state health care systems the American left thought long and carefully of how to bring that same failed system to the American people. With the health care industry totaling one-sixth of the U.S. economy that was just too great a tax hike to impose on the American people. Even Democrats would be reluctant to impose such high taxes on people they needed to vote for them. So they couldn’t go that route. At least, not yet.
President Obama breaks the Law Again as he Tells Insurers they can still Sell Policies the People Liked
There is one thing standing in their way. The private health insurance industry. For with this there is an alternative to massive new taxes. Which makes massive new taxes politically unattractive. So they have to destroy the private health insurance industry first. By lying to them. Teasing them with government mandates that will give the health insurers a lucrative windfall of business. While actually sealing their demise.
If you like your health insurance plan you can keep it. Period. That was the big lie. Because you can’t. Secretary Sebelius quickly wrote out the grandfather clause in the Affordable Care Act. Especially for the individual market. Where a lot of young and healthy people had only catastrophic policies. Because they are young and healthy. If the government was going to mandate the insurers pay for everything under the sun from free birth control to senior care they needed these young and healthy to lose their current policies and replace them with more costly policies with higher deductibles. Basically forcing them to pay for costly health insurance but never using it because of those high deductibles. Which transferred the cost of senior care to the young and healthy. Something the young and healthy would never have been onboard with if the Democrats had told the truth. Which is why the Democrats lied to them.
With the implementation of Obamacare the lies have become real. They’re touching people’s lives. And not in a good way. Millions of individual policy holders are losing their insurance. And those with employer-provided insurance will start losing theirs next year. They’d be feeling the pain today but President Obama broke the law and ordered his administration not to enforce the employer mandate of the Affordable Care Act. Giving the employers a year reprieve until they, too, have to drop their non-compliant health insurance policies. But being caught in the lie the year before the 2014 midterm elections has caused the president and the Democrats a lot of heartburn. So much that the president is once again breaking the law. And telling health insurers that they can still offer the health insurance policies the people liked. When it is virtually impossible for them to do. For they spent 3 years preparing for Obamacare and calculating insurance premiums based on the mandates bringing in enough money in premiums to pay for everything under the sun they now must cover.
If they reinstate the old ‘substandard’ policies the young and healthy will buy these instead of buying the more costly Obamacare policies. While the old and sick will buy the far more generous Obamacare policies. Which will be a bargain for them as they will consume far more health care dollars than they pay in premiums. But without the young and healthy subsidizing these policies the insurers will go bankrupt quickly as their benefits paid will far exceed their premiums collected. Forcing them to increase their premiums to pay for the higher than expected benefits paid. Until health insurance is so costly no one is buying it. Putting them out of business. So they can’t do this and hope to remain in business. And, therefore, they will not reinstate the old ‘substandard’ policies. Which is what the president wants. For he gets to blame the insurers. While accelerating the demise of the private health insurance industry. By bankrupting them as planned. AND getting the people to hate them even more. A win-win for the Obama administration. As they lie that they care about the people they are harming to expand their power. Just like every other tyrant and tin-pot dictator has done throughout history.
Tags: Affordable Care Act, Castro, Communist, deductibles, Democrats, dictator, high deductibles, high taxes, Hitler, insurance, insurance premiums, lie, mandate, National health care, Obama, Obamacare, Obamacare policies, police state, power, premiums, President Obama, private health insurance industry, Republicans, soft tyranny, Stalin, substandard policies, truth, tyranny, welfare state, young and health
« Previous Entries