Elderly Cancer Patients are not Worth the Cost of Health Care they Consume so the Policy of the NHS is to Let them Die
Week in Review
Proponents of Obamacare attack the profit-oriented private health insurers, medical device and drug manufacturers and hospitals. Putting profits before people is wrong and shameful they say. And just plain wrong. No, the better way is to do like the Canadians. And the British. Adopt a health care system that puts people before profits. Where everyone can smile and enjoy life. Content in a perfect world where everyone gets whatever health care they need. Not just the rich who can afford it. So, with that in mind, let’s take a look at that health care utopia in the United Kingdom. And see how wonderfully just, kind and generous their health care truly is (see Elderly dying due to ‘despicable age discrimination in NHS’ by Rebecca Smith posted 3/25/2012 on The Telegraph).
A lack of treatment or insufficient treatment is contributing to 14,000 deaths a year in people over the age of 75, Macmillan Cancer Support has found, in what it called an ‘unacceptable act of discrimination’.
Deaths from cancer are reducing in most age groups but at a slower rate in those aged 74 to 84 and are increasing in people aged 85 and over, the report said.
The report, The Age Old Excuse: the under treatment of older cancer patients, said treatment options are too often recommended on the basis of age rather than how fit the patient is…
Few clinical trials involve older people so clinicians are lacking evidence of how effective drugs may be in elderly people and few cancer specialists have had training in care of older people, the report said.
A survey found six in ten trainee oncologists had not received training in the additional care needs of the elderly such as preventing falls and incontinence management. This is despite half of all cancers occuring in the elderly, the report found…
“The NHS and social care providers must wake up to the specific issues older people face and ensure treatment decisions are based on their overall health not just their date of birth. Writing people off as too old for treatment is utterly shameful.”
This is the future of Obamacare. This is what happens when the government pays for health care. The government decides. They decide who lives. And who dies. Who gets treatment. And who is not worthy of treatment and should consider themselves lucky if they get a pill to dull their pain until they die. When they finally stop being such an inconvenient and inconsiderate burden to government.
Why is the NHS like this? Are the British cruel? No. It’s just business. Health care costs continue to rise despite the power of government to stop these costs from rising. Their population is aging. And they have a massive budget deficit. Made up primarily from the budget deficit in the NHS. Taxes are already high. And the economy is not doing as well as it once did. Which means you can’t raise taxes anymore. Unless you want to crash the economy and reduce tax revenues even further. And with a massive deficit you can’t borrow anymore. So if you can’t tax and you can’t borrow and you have an aging population consuming an ever larger share of the health care budget what do you do? Why, you do what the NHS is doing. You ration health care. By making life and death decisions. And the NHS has made a decision. Old people over a certain age shall die of cancer. And they will take that health care and give it to someone else who is more worthy of it.
Bureaucrats making life and death decisions for cost reasons? Kind of sounds like a death panel, doesn’t it? Now Obamacare doesn’t include anything called a ‘death panel’ but there will be a death panel. Because there always is when you ration health care. Which is what will happen as the government tries to rein in health care costs. Because that’s the only way they can control costs. By cutting costs. And how to you cut costs? You spend less on life-saving health care services. And ration these services. Deciding who has enough value to save. And who doesn’t and should die. By authority of the death panel. The secretary. Or some other bureaucrat. Who you hope their life and death decisions are based on costs alone. And not your politics.
Tags: aging population, British, budget deficit, bureaucrat, cancer, death panel, deficit, Health Care, health care costs, life and death decisions, NHS, Obamacare, power of government, raise taxes, ration, ration health care, taxes, United Kingdom