FT176: “The left instigates and exacerbates discrimination to increase their power.” —Old Pithy

Posted by PITHOCRATES - June 28th, 2013

Fundamental Truth

The Institution of Slavery was Dying Out in the U.S. before Eli Whitney and his Cotton Gin

Discrimination is wrong.  And it doesn’t belong in a meritocracy.  Which is what the United States is.  Here it doesn’t matter who your father is.  There is no nobility.  No aristocracy.  Here everyone is equal.  It’s why people came here with pennies in their pocket.  So they could work hard and live the American dream.  Having the liberty to do whatever they wanted to do.  Which many did.  Starting out sweeping floors for a boss.  And going on to be boss in their own business.

The Founding Fathers weren’t perfect.  But they were as close to perfect as you can get.  Selfless.  Disinterested.  Principled.  And, yes, some were slave owners.  But they didn’t invent slavery.  Or bring it to the New World.  It was part of the times they lived in.  And already well entrenched in the colonies before they entered into the history books.  The southern economy was already dependent on slave-labor during the writing of the Declaration of Independence.  And the U.S. Constitution.  Some of the Founding Fathers wanted to get rid of the institution.  But to form a new nation they needed the southern states.  And they wouldn’t join without their slaves.  So they tabled the subject for 20 years.  Trusting that it would resolve itself by then.  But then Eli Whitney gave us the cotton gin.  And, well, the rest is history.

The institution of slavery was slowly dying out before the cotton gin.  George Washington wanted to replace his slaves with paid-laborers.  For he wanted to change up his crops.  Grow many different crops instead of one large cash crop.  Something paid-labor was ideally suited for.  As he could hire people with a particular crops’ skill-set and they could hit the ground running.  But when you had slaves working the same large cash crop year after year such as tobacco change didn’t come easy.  For you had to retrain your slaves.  And with training there is a learning curve.  It was just so much easier to hire well-skilled paid-laborers.  And the fact that they wanted to work for you helped, too.  For when forcing people to work for you against their will all you’ll get from them is the bare minimum that lets them escape brutal punishment.  Which does not bring out a person’s latent talents.  It just prevents these talents from ever seeing the light of day.  No.  Slave-labor as an economic model was a horrible one.  As well as being immoral.

Abraham Lincoln and the new Republican Party ended Slavery in the United States

Slavery in the United States was concentrated in the South.  On the plantations.  Where they had a single, large cash crop.  And thanks to Eli Whitney that crop was cotton.  Because the cotton gin could so quickly comb the cotton fiber to remove the seeds and stems the sky was the limit.  The only thing holding back your profits was the amount of land you put in production.  And the only limit on that was the number of slaves you had to make land productive.  Which is why the institution of slavery didn’t die out in 20 years time.  Which really wasn’t overly optimistic.  Because in the grand scheme of things there weren’t that many slaves in the United States to begin with.

Of all the slaves brought to the New World only about 6.5% ended up in British North America (according to Wikipedia).  Another 18% went to other British colonies.  Another 18% went to Spanish colonies.  About 14% went to French colonies.  While the vast majority of those slaves went to Portuguese colonies in the Americas.  Approximately 39% of all African slaves.  Most landing in Brazil.  Which is why the Portuguese language is one of the top ten most spoken languages in the world today.  Because Brazil is a very large country.  Thanks to all of those slaves the Portuguese brought there.

Slavery was wrong.  And it is America’s original sin.  But it wasn’t what made America great.  Or rich.  Contrary to what our public schools are teaching our kids.  If it was the South would have won the American Civil War.  But they didn’t.  The industrial North did.  With her factories filled with paid-laborers.  This was the New World.  The South that lost the Civil War was the last remnants of the Old World in the New World.  Where it mattered who your father was.  Abraham Lincoln and the new Republican Party ended slavery in the United States.  And the Republican Party would eventually put an end to Jim Crowe laws in the south.  And passed the Civil Rights act (a larger percentage of Republicans voted for it than Democrats).

The Racial Divide has never been Greater despite electing a Black President Twice

So the Republicans have done more to end discrimination in the United States than the Democrats have.  Who have actually spent more time opposing civil rights.  But you wouldn’t know that.  Not with all the disinformation the left puts out.  Today the left claims they are the party that fights discrimination.  When in actuality they instigate and exacerbate discrimination.  Because it gives them power.  For trying to end discriminations is very lucrative.  Some have made careers and have grown quite wealthy trying to end discrimination.  You know who they are so there’s no point in naming them here.  But these people never end discrimination.  For while there’s money in fighting discrimination there’s no money in ending it.

If there are always examples of discrimination in our society then there is always a need for those who fight it.  There’s always a reason for new legislation.  To right past wrongs.  And make things fair.  So the Democrats increased the size of the welfare state.  To make the discriminated dependent on the state.  To keep them on the plantation.  Concentrating them in housing projects.  In the inner city.  Away from the Democrats’ nice neighborhoods.  They broke up their families with AFDC.  Replacing fathers with the state.  Who failed these kids miserably.  They implemented affirmative action.  Where some game the system and get a free pass.  Because of lower standards.  Getting entrance to a college or a job over someone more qualified.  Fomenting new racial unrest.  As some complain about being passed over despite being more qualified.  Which the left jumps on as proof of overt racism.  And the need for them to do something more to end it.

But they never end anything.  Because ending it would take away their power.  Which is why despite everything they’ve done since the Sixties things have never been worse.  And more policies and legislation to end discrimination have never been needed more.  Because the racial divide has never been greater.  Despite this country electing a black president.  Twice.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Spice Trade, Arab Traders, Italian City-States, European Colonialism, Dutch East India Company and Dutch Banking

Posted by PITHOCRATES - January 10th, 2012

History 101

Venice and Genoa became the Ultimate Middlemen for those Delicious Asian Spices

The next time you cook a meal don’t use any spices.  Note how less delicious your meal is.  How much less you enjoy eating it.  And how little you eat.  Keep doing this and you’ll probably lose a lot of weight.  And be healthier.  Because your food will taste so terrible that you’ll eat less.  Which can be a good thing.  As eating less can cure cardiovascular disease and diabetes in many people.  But your food will be so bland that life itself will become bland.  And less enjoyable.  Then go out with some friends and eat some buffalo wings and nachos.  Note the difference.  Then go pay homage to the spice aisle at your grocery store.

Variety is the spice of life.  And a variety of spices to make your food taste better makes that life even better.  The ancient Egyptians knew this.  And they developed some of the earliest trade routes to Indian spice markets.  The Greeks and Romans knew it, too.  Who continued this spice trade.  Buying the spices that travelled along the Silk Road from China and the Spice Islands.  Into Constantinople.  Capital of the Eastern Roman Empire.  Which became the great Byzantine Empire.  Until this overland trade was interrupted by the Arabs.  Who took over the spice trade.  Especially those coveted spices from the Spice Islands.

Meanwhile in the West the Roman Empire fell.  And ushered in the European Dark Ages.  Where life became rather bland.  Until the Italian Renaissance.  Sparked by the rise of the great Italian city-states.  Such as Venice.  And Genoa.  Who developed international banking.  And merchant trade in the Mediterranean.  Based largely on that lucrative spice trade.  Where the mighty trade empires of Venice and Genoa became the ultimate middlemen for those delicious Asian spices.  A trade now dominated by the Arabs.  Who brought it to Mediterranean ports.  Where it boarded ships bound for the great Italian city-states.  The gateway to Europe.

The Quest for Asian Spices ushered in the Era of European Colonialism

Europeans tasted their food spiced with pepper.  Nutmeg.  And other spices.  They discovered a new word.  Delicious.  There was no going back to the bland days of the Middle Ages.  They wanted more.  And did not like the stranglehold the Arabs and the Italian city-states had on this trade.  They decided to do something about it.  And set their minds to finding the source of these great spices themselves.  And find a sea route directly to that source.

The Portuguese were first.  Vasco da Gama sailed around Africa and into the Indian Ocean in 1497.  Opening the first direct sea route from Europe to India for the Portuguese Crown.  While trying to find a western sea route for the Spanish Crown Christopher Columbus discovered The Bahamas in 1492.  In 1500, Portuguese Pedro Álvares Cabral accidentally discovered Brazil trying to follow the Vasco da Gama route.  He sailed a little too far west.  Which is why they speak Portuguese in Brazil today.  Ferdinand Magellan succeeded for the Spanish where Columbus failed.  He found that western route to the Spice Islands after sailing around that new continent that Columbus and Cabral bumped into.  South America.  Through the Straits of Magellan.  And back to Spain in 1522.  Well, not Magellan.  Or 4 of his 5 ships that originally sailed.  But one ship survived this voyage.  And it was full of spices.

The quest for Asian spices ushered in the era of European colonialism.  For there was big money in this spice trade.  So much that others wanted in, too.  Two of which came up with novel ways to fund this trade.  By selling stock in trading companies.  The two big ones were the British East India Company.  And the Dutch East India Company.  And it was the Dutch who showed the world what real banking was all about.  They blew away those great Italian city-states.  They were able to put greater fleets to sea.  And finance far greater trade than the Genoese or the Venetians ever dreamed.

Dutch Banking helped the Americans gain Legitimacy in the World of Nations

These trading companies did more than trade.  They settled colonies.  Negotiated international treaties.  Coined money.  Even waged war.  The Dutch and the British went to war in many places over their new colonies and the wealthy trade they produced.  In the Spice Islands.  China.  India.  Africa.  Even in the New World.  Where the Dutch traded Manhattan to the British for Run, another of the Spice Islands so the Dutch could corner the nutmeg market.

An interesting turn of events goes back to that Dutch banking.  After the United States won their independence from Britain one of the first loans the Americans secured to help pay their massive war debt was the one John Adams negotiated with the Dutch.  So Manhattan went from the Dutch to the British to the Americans.  And thanks to the Dutch it would stay American.  As the Americans were able to get their finances in order.  And gain legitimacy in the world of nations.  Not to mention becoming home of some of the finest restaurants in the world.  Serving some of the tastiest foods ever to grace a palate.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Brazil is Rich in Resources but Beset with Poverty Despite its Social Spending

Posted by PITHOCRATES - December 18th, 2011

Week in Review

The Portuguese colonized Brazil.  Which is why Portuguese is one of the top ten most spoken languages in the world.  Because there are a great many Brazilians speaking Portuguese.  So there is a strong bond between Brazil and Europe.  Home of tiny little Portugal (and a wonderful dessert wine.  Port).  Perhaps a little too strong (see Brazil state struggles with poverty despite rich natural resources posted 12/12/2011 on the Los Angeles Times).

Brazil’s huge northern state of Pará is about three times the size of California, home to much of the Amazon rain forest and is the second-largest producer of the nation’s most important export, iron ore.

But poverty levels are well above the national average…

Even opponents of the bill, however, recognized the predicament, and it’s one that is repeated in parts of Peru, Colombia and elsewhere in South America: the lack of central government representation for states that are resource-rich (be it mining, gas or other commodities) but poverty-stricken.

“We can’t accept that in this country, natural resources benefit companies, but not its people,” said Simão Jatene, governor of Pará. “The Brazilian fiscal system is extremely perverse with respect to Pará…”

In Brazil, the last decade of economic growth has brought tens of millions of Brazilians out of poverty, powered by commodities exports, consumer credit growth and social spending. But the country still remains extremely unequal, across class and geographical lines. Some parts of the southeastern cities of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro have a higher gross domestic product per capita than rich European countries, while in remote parts of Pará, residents who are struck ill must brave a five-day boat ride to the nearest hospital for treatment, O Globo reported.

The Amazon rain forest, eh?  Perhaps part of the problem is the environmentalists trying to save the rain forest.  Preventing any development there.  Condemning these people to a life of poverty.  Because it is usually a trade off.  Save the planet.  Or save man.  Rarely can you do both.  At least the way the environmentalists see it.  Who won’t be happy until they take civilization back to the days of Neanderthal.  And you know there are those out there who would bitch about Neanderthal’s use of tools changing his environment, too.  Which is the greatest crime man can make.  Changing his environment.

The lack of central government is the problem?  Funny.  The lack of central government didn’t stop the British and the Industrial Revolution they kicked off.  And the lack of central government didn’t appear to be a problem for Andrew Carnegie as he created a steel revolution in the United States.  Which is far bigger than California.  Yet the economy of the country grew so great it topped the mighty British Empire from the top spot.  One country with a limited central government.  Besting another country with a limited central government.

The problem the Brazilians have is spelled out in this article.  Their economy has been driven by the export of commodity materials.  Exporting raw materials?!?  This isn’t capitalism.  This is mercantilism.  And why only some Brazilians are living the good life.  They need to ignite an engine of economic exchange within Brazil.  Use those raw materials in domestic industries.  Build factories to transform them into consumer goods that Brazilians will buy with their factory wages.  Like the Americans did in the 19th century.  And we did that with less central government than we have today.  And I’m guessing that’s the only problem Brazil has.  Too much government.

Any country has the human capital to do what the Americans and the British did.  They just need the key to unlock that capital.  And the key to that lock is called free market capitalism.  Brazil is already far down this road.  They just need to let the rest of their country play catch-up.  And they’ve got to back off on the social spending.  Or else they’ll end up like Europe and their Eurozone.  Fighting for their life.  From excessive social spending.  If European capitalists had any advice for the Brazilians it would be this; don’t do it.  Don’t follow them down the Road to Serfdom.  Be free.  Stay free.  And let capitalism be free.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,