Having Government remake our Health Care System is not the Limited Government of our Founding Fathers
According to a Gallup poll approximately 38% of people identify themselves as conservative while only 23% identify themselves as liberal (see Liberal Self-Identification Edges Up to New High in 2013 by Jeffrey M. Jones posted 1/10/2014 on Gallup). With most of the rest (34%) identifying themselves as moderate. Or, in other words, 77% of the people do NOT identify themselves as liberal. That’s over three-quarters of the population. Which means if you were in a group of four people only one of the four would be a liberal.
And yet we have Obamacare. Thanks to the Affordable Care Act passed on partisan lines when the Democrats controlled both chambers of Congress. The most liberal change to our health care system (the government will charge people a fine/tax if they don’t buy health insurance). The only time in history that government has forced people to buy something against their will. Without having any kind of say in the matter. Like we do with car insurance. If you don’t want to buy car insurance all you have to do is NOT drive a car. But with Obamacare there is no choice. Everyone has to buy health insurance. Period.
Having government remake our health care system is not the limited government of our Founding Fathers. It is actually more in keeping with a royal decree issued by the king the Founding Fathers fought for their independence from. Ye shall do this. For the ruler has spoken. And ye shall pay more taxes to fund this huge growth of government. Another thing not in keeping with our Founding Fathers. Higher taxes. So how have we come to this when 77% of the people don’t want any of this? Because liberals are some of the best liars in the world. That’s how.
Discounted Reimbursements are causing Doctors and Hospitals to leave the Obamacare Network
To make Obamacare work they needed to get people to pay more for their health insurance. So they could raise a lot of money to subsidize health insurance for those who could not afford to buy it. Which they couldn’t do if people kept the policies they liked and wanted to keep. Especially those lower-cost ones. So they made the policies people liked and wanted to keep noncompliant with the Affordable Care Act. Forcing their insurers to cancel them. And forcing people to buy more costly policies. This providing the subsidy money Obamacare needed.
So this was the plan. To cause mass cancellations. And then force those people with cancelled policies to buy more expensive policies. But this was only part of the formula. To keep more of those higher insurance premiums they also raised deductibles. So not only did people pay more for their health insurance policies. Those policies paid for less. Forcing people to spend a lot more out-of-pocket before their insurance kicked in.
We have huge budget deficits. And growing national debt. A big part of that debt is from Medicare and Medicaid (and Social Security). Getting people to pay for other people’s health insurance won’t cut these costs. But there is something that will, though. The same thing the government is doing with Medicare. Pay doctors and hospitals less. By discounting their reimbursements. It worked pretty well with Medicare. So they were sure it would work well with Obamacare. Of course, health care providers overcharged private insurers to recoup what the government didn’t pay. So this will no longer be an option under Obamacare. Which has caused a lot of doctors and hospitals to already leave the Obamacare network.
People would rather hear a Pleasant Lie than an Unpleasant Truth
There was a lot if opposition to the Affordable Care Act. For the people did not want national health care. And they felt that was where Obamacare would lead to. So President Obama told people in person. And looked into the camera. Making a promise to the American people. “If you like your health care plan you can keep your health care plan. If you like your doctor you can keep your doctor. If you like your hospital you can keep your hospital. Period. No one was going to take these away from you. All we’re going to do is give you better health insurance while saving the average family $2,500 on their annual insurance premium.” None of which was true.
Of course, had the president told the truth he would only have confirmed everyone’s fears. Which is why he lied. A lie so big PolitiFact named it the Lie of the Year. And he told the lie so easily. He was so reassuring that the people believed him. In fact, they wanted to believe him. For they liked this president. And they trusted him. Despite his economic policies having failed to produce a strong economic recovery. For even when polls showed the people thought his policies were taking the country in the wrong direction the people still liked him. Because he tried. Always saying things the people wanted to hear. A lot of feel-good things. Affordable health care for everyone. Leveling the playing field. Making the rich pay their fair share. Free birth control. Not enforcing federal drug laws in Colorado and Washington. With talk like that no wonder the people liked him. And why it was so easy for him to lie to the people. As they were willing to believe just about anything he said.
President Obama is everything our parents aren’t. Who tell us what we need to do. What we should do. And what we shouldn’t do. Regular killjoys. Unlike the president. And the Democrats. Who don’t mind people having a little fun in their lives. Unlike the Republicans. Who are as bad as our parents. Always telling us things we don’t want to hear. Like truths. Facts. And how things are. Reality. While the president and the Democrats tell us how things could be. How life can be more fun and more carefree their way. Whereas life requires a lot of hard work and sacrifice the Republicans’ way. Because reality can suck. Which is why some people use intoxicants to escape it. Or vote Democrat. Willing to accept on faith their fictional
alternative to escape reality. For it turns out people would rather hear a pleasant lie than an unpleasant truth. And people will like you if you tell them pleasant lies. While they won’t like you very much if you tell them unpleasant truths. Which is why good liars can make anyone like them while those who don’t lie can’t. This is why people didn’t like Mitt Romney. He told the truth. And why people liked President Obama. Because he told them what they wanted to hear. Such as things like the Lie of the Year.
Tags: Affordable Care Act, conservative, deductibles, Democrats, discounting, doctor, Founding Fathers, health care plan, health insurance, hospital, If you like your health care plan, insurance premium, liberal, lie, lie of the year, limited government, Medicare, Obamacare, pleasant lie, policies, premiums, President Obama, reimbursement, subsidy, taxes, truth, unpleasant truth
On the Eve of Cold Harbor Grizzled Union Veterans pinned Scraps of Paper with their Names and Home Cities Inside their Jackets
General Grant has a few reputations. That he was a drunk. He wasn’t. He just couldn’t hold his liquor. And he hated inactivity. And being away from his family. Two things that led him to drink. They also called him a butcher. That he cared little for his men. Which wasn’t true. The bloodiest single day of battle in the Civil War was the Battle of Antietam. Grant wasn’t there. The bloodiest battle was the three days at Gettysburg. Grant wasn’t there. One of the greatest Union defeats was at Fredericksburg. Grant wasn’t there. So it wasn’t Grant. It was the tactics used in the Civil War. Napoleonic tactics. Massing great ranks of soldiers opposite great ranks of soldiers. Fire a few shots. Close in on each other. Then finish the job with the bayonet. And plenty of finishing was needed as those Napoleonic weapons weren’t rifled. Or all that accurate.
The weapons were rifled, though, in the American Civil War. And far more accurate. So they killed a lot of soldiers as they massed and fired. And killed even more as they closed in to finish the job. They soon learned that massing troops in the open on the field of battle was not a good idea. Instead they looked for good ground to defend. At Antietam there was a sunken road in the center of the Confederate line. One of the first trenches used in warfare. Lee failed at Gettysburg because General Ewell failed to take the high ground on the eve of the first day of battle. Over night the Union entrenched strong defensive positions. That held for days 2 and 3. At Fredericksburg there was another sunken road. This one was behind a stone wall. It was also on the high ground. And that’s where the Confederates were when the Union attacked. And lost the battle.
General Lee was a combat engineer in the Mexican War. Some called him the King of Spades. So fortifying defensive positions was something he was good at. And became better at. Building breastworks. Which even the odds in battle when a numerically superior force attacks a smaller entrenched force. Like at Cold Harbor. Where the breastworks zigzagged for 5 miles. Allowing the defenders to shoot into the front of the attacking force. As well as into the side of the attacking force. Which is why on the eve of battle the grizzled veterans in the Union Army pinned scraps of paper with their names and home cities inside their jackets. An early dog tag. So when they attacked those heavily fortified defensive positions in the morning their surviving comrades could identify their bodies and send them home to family for burial. Which, sadly, proved very useful after the battle.
The Problem with Keynesian Economics is that it interferes with Market Prices causing Inflation and Bubbles
The attack was over in less than an hour. Seven thousand Union soldiers fell killed or wounded. Grant regretted his order to attack until his dying day. And he wouldn’t give such an order again. Because he learned the folly of attacking entrenched positions. And began adjusting his tactics to match the technology of the battlefield.
Sometimes it’s easier to identify failed policies in war. It may have taken some time. But it eventually became clear. For when the casualty rates soared people were less willing to send their sons off to war. Making the cost of those failed policies very real. And personal. Not abstract numbers. Like in economics. Where few understand what Keynesian economics is. Or how to identify if these policies work. Or if they fail. For if you listen to Keynesian economists they never fail. And when they do it’s not because they’re wrong. It’s because those using them weren’t bold enough. Such as using a Keynesian economic stimulus to pull an economy out of a recession. It didn’t work in the Seventies. And it didn’t work in the most recent recession. The Great Recession. And how do Keynesians explain this failure? The economic stimulus wasn’t big enough.
The problem with Keynesian economics is that it interferes with the market forces. By denying reality. The business cycle. The cycle between good economic times and bad economic times. From periods of expanding economic activity to periods of contracting economic activity. It’s this second half of the business cycle that Keynesians were especially trying to deny. Recessions. Those things that correct prices at the end of a growth cycle. Before inflation can set in and wreak its havoc. And when Keynesians interfere with this market mechanism the market doesn’t correct prices before inflation sets in. So prices keep rising. And they create asset bubbles. Like housing bubbles. Like the one that led up to the Subprime Mortgage Crisis. And because Keynesians interfered all they did was delay the inevitable. Allowing prices to rise higher than they normally would have. Which meant they had further to fall. Creating a longer and more painful recession than there would have been had they not interfered.
Unlike a Keynesian, General Grant Recognized a Failed Policy and Stopped Using It
Keynesians try to reduce economics down to a set of mathematical equations. That they accept on faith. Blinded by their ideology. And refuse to recognize their failure. Which is why they continue to interfere with market forces. And continue to make recessions longer and more painful than they need be. While strewing a swath of economic destruction in their path. Like all of those home owners who lost so much value in their houses that their mortgages are now greater than the market price of their house. Many lost their retirement nest egg in the process. Some even had to alter their retirement plans because of their losses. Or go back to work in their retirement.
These aren’t bodies littering a battlefield. But the Keynesian carnage has destroyed lives just the same. Impoverishing future generations to pay for their inept policies. For people not even born today will have a tax bill so great that it will diminish their living standard far below what we enjoy today. As bad as that is what’s worse is that they don’t change their policies after these failures. Believing that the only reason they’ve failed is because they didn’t try them on a grand enough scale. Or the government quit them before they had a chance to work.
Thankfully General Grant didn’t use such Keynesian thinking at Cold Harbor. Had he used such reasoning he would have ordered a second assault. And a third. And kept ordering them as long as he had living men to send in against that entrenched defense. But he didn’t. Why? Because he was smarter than a Keynesian. He recognized a failed policy. And stopped using it.
Tags: Antietam, breastworks, bubbles, business cycle, Civil War, Cold Harbor, correct prices, defensive positions, economic activity, Economics, entrenched positions, failed policies, Fredericksburg, General Grant, General Lee, Gettysburg, Grant, inflation, Keynesian, Keynesian carnage, Keynesian economics, Keynesian economists, market forces, Napoleonic, policies, prices, recession, soldiers, tactics
Week in Review
Harvard is working on our energy solution. And it coincidentally happens to mesh with their environmental agenda (see Harvard Study Calls for Radical Increase in U.S. Energy Innovation Spending by William Pentland posted 11/23/2011 on Forbes).
The U.S. government could save the economy hundreds of billions of dollars annually by 2050 by expanding support for energy innovation, according to the results of a three-year research project at the Harvard Kennedy School.
Okay, two problems can be noted from the get-go. The report is from Harvard. And it’s by the Kennedy School at Harvard. Two names that don’t jump to anyone’s mind when you think of profits and energy. No. What you typically think of when you hear these names are liberal causes. At our expense. Increasing the cost of daily life with their regulatory policies. To drag Americans kicking and screaming into a world we don’t want. But one that they believe is in our best interests.
The U.S. federal government should implement policies that create market incentives to develop and deploy new energy technologies, including policies that have the effect of creating a substantial price on carbon emissions, and sector-specific policies to overcome other market failures.
There are no such things as market failures. They like to use that term when their market tinkering doesn’t produce the results they want. That is, when their policies have failed. But they can never blame their policies. So they blame the market. Call their failures market failures. So they can create more policy to correct their past failures.
The price on carbon emissions would the biggest tax ever levied on the American people. And that’s why they want to levy it. For the money the government can spend on other liberal folly. And the control they could use to strangle the American economy when it fails to do as they wish.
The U.S. government should take a strategic approach to working with the private sector on energy innovation, expanding incentives for private sector energy innovation, and focusing on the particular strategies likely to work best in each case.
In other words, they think the government should pick the winners and losers in energy. Just like they did with Solyndra. Where the government can reward political campaign donors with lucrative government loans. Just like they did with Solyndra.
The U.S. government should undertake a strategic approach to energy RD&D cooperation with other countries, to leverage the knowledge, resources, and opportunities available around the world, incorporating both top-down strategic priorities and investment in new ideas arising from the bottom-up.
Sort of a Kyoto writ large. Only with more bite. As the global warming agenda passed at Kyoto had very little bite.
Anytime you see an energy report coming out of Harvard consider the source. And their ulterior motive. One world, liberal government. With them at the top. And the rest of us doing what they tell us to do.
Tags: carbon emissions, economy, energy, environmentalism, Global Warming, Harvard, Kyoto, liberal, liberal causes, market failures, policies, Solyndra
Obama falls from grace because the American people have learned what the mainstream media wouldn’t tell them; the truth.
America, Europe, the Middle East, hell, the whole world had a love affair with Barrack Obama. A man who did nothing but serve a partial term as a U.S. senator. Before that? Community organizer. His resume had a lot of white space on it. He is the most inexperienced person to ever become president. Even Sarah Palin, who the Left disparages as stupid and experienced, has executive experience. She was more qualified than Obama to be president. Based on their experience. Place their resumes side by side and no one can dispute this. Yet Palin is stupid and inexperienced. And Obama is the second coming of Christ. And when the results of Obama’s policies reflect his experience, those infatuated express shock and disbelief (see Europe ‘dismayed’ as midterms highlight Obama’s struggles by Marian Smith, msnbc.com).
“They’re very confused as to how [Americans] could vote for Obama and then two years later turn around and vote for a completely different set of policies,” Sarah Oates, professor of political communication the University of Glasgow, told msnbc.com.
There’s a simple reason for this confusion. The mainstream media was also infatuated with Obama. They endorsed his candidacy. But they never vetted him. No one knew anything about Obama during the campaign. They ignored his far-left associations with Reverend Wright and Bill Aires. They didn’t discuss his criticism of the U.S. Constitution (it didn’t empower government enough). Or his policy guide: Rules for Radicals by Saul Alinsky. The mainstream media’s gross journalistic malfeasance hid the real man from the American voter. The real Obama is not the Obama the American people voted for. Hence his fall from grace.
Jimmy Carter handed off a worse economy than Bush. But things got better when Ronald Reagan cut taxes.
Obama has told us ad nauseam that he inherited the worst economy since the Great Depression. Some would argue that the numbers were pretty bad when Ronald Reagan took office. But he followed Democrat Jimmy Carter. So they don’t like to bring up his atrocious economy. Because the economy he handed down to Ronald Reagan was pretty atrocious. I mean, they didn’t use words like ‘malaise’, ‘stagflation’ or ‘misery index’ during the Bush economy. And they’re not using them during the Obama economy. But you repeat the lie enough, people just accept it as fact.
However, Obama remains broadly well-liked and many Europeans think the disenchantment that many American voters have been expressing is unfair.
“What he inherited was so enormous that no American president could have fixed it,” Manfred Gortemaker, professor of modern history at Germany’s University of Potsdam, told msnbc.com.
The bad economy Obama inherited was a long time in the making. Because the Democrats were in power for a long time. And it was their passion that caused it. Affordable housing. Putting people into houses who couldn’t afford houses. Ask anyone which party you think of when it comes to affordable housing and they’re not going to say Republican. The American disenchantment is with Democrat Big Government. And Obama believes in Big Government. The bigger the better. America just can’t afford it anymore. There isn’t enough money left in the private sector to steal to pay for it. And Obama just wants to spend more. But spending doesn’t work. It didn’t help Carter. That’s why he lost to Reagan. Reagan cut taxes. And, you know what? That worked. The electorate wants more Reagan. Less Obama.
It’s good t be king. As long it’s not 1790 France. Or 2010 America where the Tea Party is spoiling a good time for the ruling elite.
The French can’t figure out the Tea Party movement.
“In all the French newspapers and magazines, people are writing, trying to figure it out,” Bacharan said.
Michelle Obama stayed at a 5-star Spanish resort while Americans were suffering near 10% unemployment and seeing banks foreclose on their homes. There have been other vacations at very expensive and exclusive resorts. And a lot of golf outings. Obama has played more golf in 2 years than George W. Bush has in his 8 years. Then there’s the latest presidential vacation. They’re going to India. They’ll be taking 40 airplanes. Three helicopters. A bunch of armored cars. And they’ll be staying at the 5-star Taj Mahal hotel. And only them. The Obama party has booked the whole place. It’s good to be king.
Now, I’m poking a little fun at my French friends. That ‘good to be king’ line comes from Mel Brooks History of the World Part One. But it’s something the French should understand. While the masses are suffering, the Obamas are living like royalty. They are detached from ordinary America. Cold and detached. Sort of like King Louis XVI and his queen, Marie Antoinette. We’re just waiting for Michelle Obama to say, “Let them eat cake.” Of course, we have the right to vote. Unlike the people did in 1790 France with their ruling elite. And it’s that right that the Tea Party is exercising. Because they feel the way the French felt in 1790. (Without the famine, of course.)
The Tea Party are not Nazis; Obama is not Hitler. But the Nazis were Big Government liberals
The mainstream media has been falsely reporting a ‘Nazi’ element within the Tea Party. They repeat the lie so often that many accept it as fact. Even the Germans, no doubt sensitive to anything Nazi, are writing about it.
“The Holocaust was the result of murderous ideological fanaticism of the kind not to be found in leaders forced to face re-election every four years,” [a Der Spiegel newspaper] editorial said. “It is hard to imagine even the most hard-bitten Tea Party activist sincerely believing that President Barack Obama wants to systematically murder over 6 million people like Adolf Hitler did. And that is necessarily the implication.”
The German people elected Adolf Hitler to office in free elections. He did not campaign on the Holocaust, though. He did adopt what would eventually be Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals. He identified, isolated and attacked his enemies. The Jews. Obama has identified, isolated and attacked his enemies. The Tea Party. George W. Bush. And Republicans in general. Hitler was an environmentalist. Obama is an environmentalist. Hitler expanded state power. Obama wants to expand state power. Hitler controlled state media. Obama has a willing and complicit mainstream media. Hitler nationalized industries. Obama nationalized industries. Take away the crazy, the Holocaust and the militarism, and Hitler was just another Big Government liberal. Like Mussolini. Like Stalin. And FDR. And as Big Government liberals, they lied to their electorate to get elected (well, except for Stalin). Then people learned the truth.
That said, Obama is no Hitler. He is not a Nazi. Sure, some kooks on the fringe say stupid things. Just like some on the Left said George W. Bush was another Hitler. Called him a Nazi. But we need to stop the crazy. On both sides. Obama got a pass by the mainstream media during the campaign. They worshipped and adored him. Got the people to vote for him. And now people have learned the truth. And here’s why Obama is NOT Adolf Hitler. We can fix our mistake in the voting booth.
Tags: 1790 France, 2010 America, affordable housing, American People, American voter, Barrack Obama, Big Government, Big Government liberal, Bill Aires, Bush, Bush economy, community organizer, cut taxes, Democrat, environmentalist, expand state power, fall from grace, far-left associations, France, French, George W. Bush, good t be king, Hitler, Jimmy Carter, journalistic malfeasance, liberal, mainstream media, malaise, Michelle Obama, misery index, nationalized industries, Nazis, Obama, Obama economy, Obama's policies, policies, Reagan cut taxes, repeat the lie, Republican, Reverend Wright, Ronald Reagan, Rules for Radicals, ruling elite, Sarah Palin, Saul Alinsky, stagflation, state media, taxes, Tea Party, the Left, worst economy since the Great Depression