Stem Cells from Cadavers promise more Hope than Embryonic Stem Cells ever Promised

Posted by PITHOCRATES - December 23rd, 2012

Week in Review

One of the most politicized subjects is stem cells.  The potential miracle cure for the worst that ails us.  They could make the blind see again.  And the paralyzed walk again.  The Left politicized Michael J. Fox and Christopher Reeve.  Saying we could cure Fox’s Parkinson’s disease and Reeve’s paralysis with the miracle of stem cells.  But not just any stem cells.  Embryonic stem cells.  That is if it wasn’t for the rascally Republicans who wanted Fox and Reeve to continue to suffer their maladies.  Even die.  Because Republicans opposed using aborted fetuses for ethical reasons.  While the Left wanted the use of embryonic stem cells as they would give abortions a higher purpose.  The gift of life.  After extinguishing life (see Cadaver stem cells offer new hope of life after death by Jessica Hamzelou posted 12/21/2012 on New Scientist).

Dead bodies can provide organs for transplants, now they might become a source of stem cells too. Huge numbers of stem cells can still be mined from bone marrow five days after death to be potentially used in a variety of life-saving treatments.

Human bone marrow contains mesenchymal stem cells, which can develop into bone, cartilage, fat and other cell types. MSCs can be transplanted and the type of cell they form depends on where they are injected. Cells injected into the heart, for example, can form healthy new tissue, a useful therapy for people with chronic heart conditions.

Unlike other tissue transplants, MSCs taken from one person tend not to be rejected by another’s immune system. In fact, MSCs appear to pacify immune cells. It is this feature which has made MSC treatments invaluable for children with graft-versus-host disease, in which transplants aimed at treating diseases such as leukaemia attack the child instead…

While only limited amounts of bone marrow can be taken from a living donor, a cadaver represents a plentiful source of cells, says D’Ippolito. “From one donor, you could take the whole spine, for example. You are going to end up with billions of cells…”

… Chris Mason at University College London sees a potential hurdle in using such MSCs in therapy. “The work is novel and intriguing… but it would be better to use a living donor,” he says. That’s partly because medical regulators oppose treating individuals with stem cells from more than one source. “You can always go back and get more stem cells from a living donor if you need them, but if you use a cadaver, you’ll eventually run out.”

They’re making great strides with adult stem cells.  From living donors.  And now from dead ones.  But one thing you don’t hear a lot about are advances made with embryonic stem cells.  Could it be that the Left was wrong all along?  That they were just looking for a noble purpose for abortions?  Perhaps.

A big problem with embryonic stem cells was their rejection.  Or complications that resulted in things like tumors.  Things that didn’t happen with adult stem cells.  Especially those harvested from the same body.  And now apparently from dead people.  People who have died from some other cause other than abortion.

The continued advances in adult stem cell research leave advances in embryonic stem cell research conspicuous by its absence.  Despite all of the false hope the Left gave people like Michael J. Fox and Christopher Reeve.  Suggesting that their arguments were more political than medical.  As everything with them is political.  For everything is about advancing their agenda.  And they were more than willing to lead medical research down a false path to advance their agenda.


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Michael J. Fox admits Embryonic Stem Cell Research may not hold Cure for Parkinson’s Disease

Posted by PITHOCRATES - May 20th, 2012

Week in Review

During the 2006 midterm elections Rush Limbaugh and actor Michael J. Fox were at the center of a Missouri initiative to allow funding for embryonic stem cell research.  Limbaugh claimed Fox went off of his meds in political campaign ads to exaggerate the effects of the disease.  A webcam showed Limbaugh even mimicking Fox’s appearance.  Which did not make Limbaugh very popular. 

The ads said that embryonic stem cell research held the best possible chance to find a cure.  Opponents said that it would lead to harvesting human fetuses for medical research.  And contrary to the claims and media blitz embryonic stem cell research showed no such promising hope.  There were successes with adult stem cell research.  But not with embryonic stem cell research.  But the Left championed embryonic stem cell research as the Holy Grail to cure all that ails us.  Now some 6 years later even Michael J. Fox admits this research path may not yield the cure (see Michael J. Fox Looks Past Stem Cells to Internet for Parkinson’s Cure by Russell Goldman, ABC News, posted 5/18/2012 on Yahoo! News).

Michael J. Fox, whose turn from Parkinson’s disease patient to scientific crusader made him one of the country’s most visible advocates for stem cell research, now believes the controversial therapy may not ultimately yield a cure for his disease, he told ABC’s Diane Sawyer in an exclusive interview.

There have been “problems along the way,” Fox said of stem cell studies, for which he has long advocated.   Instead, he said, new drug therapies are showing real promise and are “closer today” to providing a cure for Parkinson’s disease, a degenerative illness that over time causes the body to become rigid and the brain to shut down.

 “Stem cells are an avenue of research that we’ve pursued and continue to pursue but it’s part of a broad portfolio of things that we look at. There have been some issues with stem cells, some problems along the way,” said Fox, who suffers from the diseases’ telltale tics and tremors.

 “It’s not so much that [stem cell research has] diminished in its prospects for  breakthroughs as much as it’s the other avenues of research have grown and multiplied and become as much or more promising. So, an answer may come from stem cell research but it’s more than likely to come from another area,” he said.

So why did the Left build up such false hopes?  Why did they insist that embryonic stem cell research held the secrets to cure people suffering from everything from Parkinson’s disease to paralysis?  They didn’t base it on medical research.  So what was it based on?  Politics.  I mean, if it was not good science what else could it be?  So what are the politics in this issue?  One can only guess it had to do with the source of those embryonic stem cells.  Abortions.  Perhaps the number one issue on the Left. 

Could this have all been about trying to give a higher and nobler purpose for all of those abortions?  That these aborted lives did not die in vain?  That they sacrificed so others may live?  Perhaps.  There is a reason why the Left championed this cause.  And this would explain why they would have given false hope to so many.  To further entrench abortion into our lives.

Everyone likes Michael J. Fox.  Whether you agree with his politics or not.  He deserved far better than to use his celebrity and his disease for political gain.


Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

A Company in New Zealand finds Promising Results when using Pig Brain Cells to Treat Parkinson’s Disease

Posted by PITHOCRATES - April 21st, 2012

Week in Review

During the 2006 midterm election a little dustup occurred between Michael J. Fox and Rush Limbaugh.  Fox has Parkinson’ disease.  He was supporting a Democrat candidate who was in favor of embryonic stem cell research.  According to Fox embryonic stem cells held the greatest hope in finding a cure.  Those on the right oppose this for two reasons.  For one they questioned the ethics of ‘farming’ human embryos for scientific experimentation.  The other being that the track record for adult stem cell research had a better track record then embryonic stem cells.  Fox appeared in a campaign commercial visibly shaking from the affects of Parkinson’s disease.  Limbaugh said that he went off of his meds to make the affects of his disease worse for political purposes.  Even imitating a shaking Michael J. Fox.  Images of Rush Limbaugh’s imitation played across mainstream media.  Which the left also used for political purposes.

The Democrats won both houses of Congress and a majority of governorships in the 2006 midterm elections.  The Democrats then won the white House in 2008.  So like it or not the Democrats had the power.  And if embryonic stem cells held the cure they were in a position to do something about it (see Reuters: New Zealand firm to trial pig cells to treat Parkinson’s by Victoria Thieberger posted 4/17/2012 on Reuters).

A New Zealand company plans to implant pig cells in the human brain in a clinical trial to treat Parkinson’s disease and help improve movement and brain functions in patients.

And here we are in 2012 and what are researches using in the battle of Parkinson’s?  Pig cells.  Why are they experimenting with pig cells?  Well, adult stem cells had shown promise.  They worked a little.  But the improvements were fleeting.  Studies done with embryonic stem cells had shown some promise, too.  But there were side effects.  Including tumors.  And the disease sometimes spread to the newly implanted cells.  Which is why they’re trying pig cells.  So as of yet they haven’t proven embryonic stem cells to be the panacea some people have claimed them to be.

So perhaps the debate over embryonic stem cells has been more political than scientific.  For it would help those on the left in the debate over when human life begins.  If we started ‘farming’ embryonic stem cells for scientific experimentation and, better yet, used them for medical treatment, it could change a lot of minds.  Boiling the debate down to a simple choice.  Save lives?  Or ban abortions?  Some people may go all Mr. Spock in their rationalization.  “The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.  Or the one.”   Especially if they believe the one isn’t a human yet.

Let’s hope the New Zealanders are on to something.  And can find a cure for this horrible disease.  Let’s also hope that they are basing this research on good science, though.  And not politics.  For there is nothing worse than giving someone false hope just because it’s politically expedient.


Tags: , , , , , , , , ,