FT204: “The young and dumb vote liberal while the old and wise vote conservative.” —Old Pithy

Posted by PITHOCRATES - January 10th, 2014

Fundamental Truth

Having the Ability to give Beautiful Young Women Nice Things helped Charlie Harper get them in Bed

On the show Two and a Half Men there was an episode where Charlie (played by Charlie Sheen) was having a conversation with someone where he was trying to defend himself and the choice he makes in women.  In broke off in mid sentence and said something like, “Yeah, you got me.  Young and dumb.  That’s how I like them.”  Or something like that.

Charlie Harper was about 40 years old.  Rich.  He drank to excess.  Smoked cigars.  Gambled.  Enjoyed strip bars and prostitutes.  And he womanized.  Getting beautiful young women back to his Malibu beach house for one night of passion.  Which was all he wanted.  One night.  The ladies thought he wanted more.  Because of the lies he told them to get them to his Malibu beach house.  And when they left in the morning they expected Charlie to call them.  But he never did.  Which is why he liked his women dumb.  For it was easier getting them into bed.  And out of it.

Charlie was skilled in the art of picking up women.  And what to do with them after picking them up.  Skill gained over years of experience.  And being rich helped, too.  Because being able to give beautiful young women nice things (expensive dinners, going to the best clubs, spending the night at a Malibu beach house, gifts, etc.) got their attention.  They liked that life.  And wanted more of it.  So they went to his bed with him.  Thinking that by doing whatever he wanted there would be more of this glamorous life to come.  But before that could happen Charlie was telling his lies to another young and dumb woman.

Every Communist Dictator that promised a Utopia to their People made their lives Absolutely Horrible

Charlie was engaged a few times.  The last time he was engaged to Chelsea (played superbly by Jennifer Taylor).  Who was a little older than most of the women he took to his bed.  Smart.  And wise.  She had a career.  Though he had a long engagement (for him) it did not last.  Because she could do better.  Eventually leaving him for someone more mature.  In fact, every age-appropriate relationship he had failed.  Because he did not do well unless they were young and dumb.  As Chelsea said one time when leaving after a breakup, “We both knew you were going to blow it eventually.”

You can learn a lot by watching Two and a Half Men.  For the world is full of Charlie Harpers.  People that lie and manipulate people to get what they want.  Who depend on people being young and dumb.  This is how liberals have risen to power.  By selling their utopian world view to the young and ignorant.  Before they get old and wise.  And learn the truth of their liberal utopia.

There was an article in Rolling Stone saying what America needs is full-blown communism.  The author is a young guy.  An academic type.  Knows everything.  But has experienced nothing.  His head was filled with communist ideals from his leftist professors.

Imagine no possessions
I wonder if you can
No need for greed or hunger
A brotherhood of man
Imagine all the people
Sharing all the world…

But what John Lennon doesn’t sing about in Imagine is that every communist dictator that promised these things to the people made their people’s lives absolutely horrible.  Where people lived in fear of the secret police.  Were tortured at the hands of the secret police.  And died at the hands of the secret police.  Communism as an ideology has killed more people than any other dictator or ideology in all of history.  Yet college kids everywhere still imagine a world where all the people live as one.  Under the boot of an oppressive police state.  That forces the people to live in a brotherhood of man.  Or die.

Liberals are in a lot of ways like Charlie Harper because they like their Electorate Young and Dumb

Joseph Stalin terrorized his people with the KGB.  The East Germans shot their own people who tried to escape climbing over the Berlin Wall.  Cambodia’s Pol Pot killed a greater percentage of a nation’s population than any other dictator in history.  Cubans risk their lives to float from Cuba to the United States.  The masses in North Korea still suffer famine because of their oppressive Stalinist state.  Where it’s the military first.  Then the people.  And so on.  Yet college students still wear shirts with pictures of Che Guevara wearing his beret.  This hero of ignorant college students.  A guy who had urged the Soviets to launch their nuclear missiles at the United States during the Cuban Missile Crisis.

And when the secret police wasn’t killing their people the people were going without the most basic necessities.  For their planned economies could not keep their store shelves stocked.  So people went without many of the things people in Western capitalist economies take for granted.  Things even ignorant college students take for granted.  Things they just couldn’t get in their beloved communist utopias.  Ronald Reagan won the Cold War not by waging nuclear war.  He won it by creating an arms race that the Soviet economy could not keep up with AND feed her people.  Like the Americans could.  In fact, the American economic output was so great that they could feed all Americans with enough left over to export to the Soviet Union.  So the Soviet people did not die from famine.

All throughout history free market capitalism provided a better life than any planned economy.  Even in the United States.  When FDR increased government spending to end a recession it only stretched out that recession into the Great Depression.  Excessive government spending didn’t work in the 1970s for Nixon, Ford or Carter.  Nor did it work during the Great Recession for Obama.  But cuts in tax rates provided explosive economic growth for Warren Harding/Calvin Coolidge in the 1920s, JFK in the 1960s, Ronald Reagan in the 1980s and even George W. Bush in the 2000s.  Yet the young and dumb buy the liberal lie that government spending can provide a better life for all despite history proving otherwise.  And keep voting liberal.  Until they get old and wise, that is.  And start voting conservative.

Liberals are in a lot of ways like Charlie Harper.  For they like their electorate young and dumb.  So they can more easily lie to them.  To get what they want.  By making promises they never intend to keep.  Such as that brotherhood of man sharing all of the world.  For after a century or so of promising this the only people who ever enjoyed the liberal/communist utopia were those few in power.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Boehner chastises Conservatives in Congress to Stop Interfering with Passing the Liberal Agenda

Posted by PITHOCRATES - December 15th, 2013

Week in Review

The establishment Republicans are getting sick and tired of conservatives.  Their base.  And they’re starting to speak out against them in harsher tones they rarely if ever use on Democrats (see Why The GOP Civil War Just Exploded Out Into The Open — Again by Brett LoGiurato posted 12/12/2013 on Business Insider).

On Dec. 12, House Speaker John Boehner finally conveyed the bewildered sentiment that so many Republicans shared as far back as August.

Speaking at a press conference where he said outside conservative groups have “lost all credibility,” Boehner referenced comments that Heritage Action CEO Michael Needham made toward the end of October’s federal government shutdown — one that Boehner suggested Republicans were pushed into by the “defund Obamacare”-happy outside conservative groups.

“Everybody understands that we will not be able to repeal this law until 2017,” Needham had told Fox News — as in, repeal isn’t possible until a Republican is in the White House. To Boehner, that was a tacit admission that these groups knew their strategy was unworkable.

Well, that’s the problem the conservatives have with the establishment Republicans, isn’t it?  Winning the White House.  Which they haven’t been able to do with the last two establishment Republican candidates.  Both who proudly proclaimed that they could reach across the aisle and work with Democrats.  Which basically meant that they would help the Democrats pass their liberal agenda.  By NOT trying to advance a conservative agenda.  What 40% of the electorate wants.

Being that about 40% of the electorate is conservative these Democrat-lite candidates didn’t rally the Republican base.  The 21% of the electorate that is liberal were never going to vote for a Republican.  And the moderates in the middle who lean Democrat vote for the real Democrat candidate.  Not the Democrat-lite candidate.  Always.

This is why the conservatives in Congress are a bit exasperated with the establishment Republicans.  Because they lose the election that matters.  By NOT running a conservative candidate.  And they never push back on the liberal agenda as they are so afraid that the media will say bad things about them.  Or liberals won’t like them.  It’s either that or the establishment Republicans, like liberals, want big government.  Because they, too, like the money and the power.  And don’t want any of that limited government nonsense.  That thing our Founding Fathers gave us.

When was the last time that the Republicans won by a landslide?  That’s right.  When they ran a conservative candidate.  Ronald Reagan.  Another conservative the Republican establishment didn’t like.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Free Speech is becoming an Endangered Species in Communist Vietnam

Posted by PITHOCRATES - December 1st, 2013

Week in Review

The American left has been critical of free speech that they don’t agree with.  Nancy Pelosi has stated she would like to bring back the Fairness Doctrine (aka the Hush Rush Bill).  Forcing radio stations who carried conservative talk shows like the Rush Limbaugh show to carry equal programming of the opposite viewpoint.  For try as they might liberals have no Rush Limbaugh of their own.  So if they can’t beat them they would like a law to encourage broadcasters to drop these conservative talk shows.  As they probably would if they were forced to carry an equal amount of programming of the opposite viewpoint.  For it would be easier just not to carry controversial programming.

And then there’s net neutrality.  Which is kind of like the Fairness Doctrine for the Internet.  But more complex.  And more murky.  The left likes the idea of enforcing net neutrality.  Especially if they could shut down conservative websites they didn’t like.  For that would make it harder to fund raise.  And you wouldn’t have to use the IRS to illegally impede conservative fundraising.  Like they did with Tea Party groups in the 2012 election.  Getting caught in that was just a pain in the ass for the Democrats.  And they would love to be able to do the same thing without anyone throwing the Rule of Law in their face.

The rollout of Obamacare was not all that great.  And the White House didn’t like what they were hearing in the media.  So they called in their friends in the liberal media.  And said you’re killing us.  Please don’t say these things anymore.  And, instead, say these talking points.  Lie for us.  Just help us get these idiots (the people losing their health insurance because of Obamacare) off of our backs.  It was an ‘off the record’ meeting so we don’t know exactly what they said.  But this was probably the gist.  A return to that recurring theme of theirs.  Trying to censor bad things being said about them.  Using these sneaky ways because they just can’t do this (see Vietnam: Criticize government on social media and go to jail by Dara Kerr posted 11/29/2013 on CNET).

 Vietnam is joining the ranks of Iran, Saudi Arabia, and China, as being known as a country that censors its citizens on social media.

The government introduced a new law this week that fines people $4,740 for posting comments critical of the government on social-networking sites like Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube, according to Reuters. Some people could also face extensive prison terms.

While the law is unclear about what kind of speech sparks government censorship, it does say that “propaganda against the state” and “reactionary ideology” would elicit fines.

Vietnam’s communist government has increasingly censored its citizens’ free speech over the past few years. According to Reuters, arrests and convictions for criticizing the government online have skyrocketed the last four years…

In a recent Global Transparency Report, Google said that it has seen an alarming incidence in government requests to gather information on their citizens. Some of the top offending countries in Google’s report include the US, India, and Germany.

You know the Obama administration would love to do this.  You should at least not be surprised if they did.  For they are spying on us.  And collecting information on us.  Using the IRS to silence the opposition.  Lying to us, telling us a YouTube video killed our ambassador and three other Americans in Benghazi.  Something they are tired hearing about.  And no doubt envy Iran, Saudi Arabia, and China for being able to do what they want to do but can’t.  Having the power to take away our free speech.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The British Left will brand School Children Racist if their Parents don’t let them go on an Anti-Christian Field Trip

Posted by PITHOCRATES - November 30th, 2013

Week in Review

If you’ve ever watched The Five you’ve probably heard Greg Gutfeld (libertarian/quasi conservative) blame all of our woes on liberal college professors.  And heard Bob Beckel (liberal) say Greg Gutfeld is full of excrement.  And that whenever they play a video of a leftist professor saying something anti-capitalist/socialist/communist Beckel (the one liberal in the group of five) yells that they only put on liberal extremists.  Never a conservative extremist.  Which he said there are just as many as liberal extremists teaching our kids in college.

Of course he’s full of excrement.  Because conservatives aren’t in control of the curriculum.  Liberals are.  In the United States.  And in the United Kingdom.  And it’s because they control the curriculum that things like this happen (see ‘Refusal will result in a Racial Discrimination note being attached to your child’s educational record…’ by Daniel Hannan posted 11/22/2013 on The Telegraph).

As part of the National Religious Curriculum together with the multicultural community in which we live, it is a statutory requirement for Primary School aged children to experience and learn about different cultures.

The workshop is at Staffordshire University and will give your child the opportunity to explore other religions.  Children will be looking at religious artifacts, similar to those that would be on display in a museum.  They will not be partaking in any religious practices.

Refusal to allow your child to attend this trip will result in a Racial Discrimination note being attached to your child’s education record, which will remain on this file throughout their school career.

England has an official religion.  The Church of England.  Which is Protestant.  That is, Christian.  And it has a long history of being Christian.  Which makes this school action rather remarkable.  For it basically is telling British children to forget their culture and tradition.  And observe the greatness of people who are not British.

When an American high school choir wants to sing a Christmas carol referencing Jesus of Nazareth, who the Christmas holiday celebrates, the school authorities shut it down.  But they make a trip to expose students to other religions mandatory.  Why?  Because liberals hate Christianity.  And love anything that disparages Christianity.  Which is why they will brand any student who doesn’t attend a field trip that enshrines other religions (while banning high school choirs from singing Christmas carols referencing Jesus of Nazareth) as a racist.  Even though religion transcends race.

Liberals will say a cross submerged in urine is art.  But children not learning the glory of Islam and other non-Christian religions is showing an extreme lack of respect to those religions.  And is worthy of branding those children as racist.  Even though religion transcends race.

Bob Beckel is a Christian.  And is a vocal opponent of the anti-Christian acts of militant Islam.  Even condemning the whole Islamic faith as no one in that faith condemns these heinous acts.  Yet he fails to see the anti-Christian element in our public schools and universities.  Or refuses to see it.  For although Beckel is a Christian liberals in general don’t like Christian morals that frown upon premarital sex and abortion.  Things liberals are all for.  As are our public schools and universities.  As is evidenced by their handing out of free birth control.  And providing access to abortion services.  Even without parental consent wherever they can.  And this while one of those religions they want to expose our kids to, Islam, won’t let their women out of the house unless they’re covered from head to toe and in the company of a male family member.  There’s no premarital sex or abortion for them.  But this is a religion we must show tolerance to.  While showing no tolerance to Jesus of Nazareth during the holiday celebrating His birth.  Is that because conservatives are in control of the school curriculum?  No.  It’s because liberals are.  So Gutfeld is right.  And Beckel is wrong.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Lee Harvey Oswald is the Godfather of Today’s American Left

Posted by PITHOCRATES - November 24th, 2013

Week in Review

The assassination of JFK ruined this country.  Because it gave us LBJ and his liberal agenda (see If Kennedy lived: Imagining a different fate for JFK (and Johnson) 50 years later by Jeff Zeleny, Richard Coolidge and Jordyn Phelps posted 11/20/2013 on Yahoo! News).

Historian Jeff Greenfield imagines how history would have changed if Lee Harvey Oswald hadn’t been successful in firing a fatal shot to Kennedy 50 years ago. It’s the latest alternative history from Greenfield in his new book, “If Kennedy Lived: The First and Second Terms of President John F. Kennedy.”

Greenfield, who re-examined the political realities that were present prior to the assassination, told “The Fine Print” he believes that Kennedy’s survival would have likely meant the demise of then-Vice President Lyndon Johnson’s political career.

“The moment John Kennedy was shot, quite literally, LIFE Magazine — a very important medium back then — was launching a huge investigation into how this public servant had accumulated a $14 million net worth, and the answer wasn’t pretty,” Greenfield said of Johnson. “It had to do with radio and TV licenses, and something close to extortion.”

The investigation was halted once Kennedy died, Greenfield said, “Because it would’ve been too much of a shock to the system.” But in Greenfield’s alternate history, the investigation grows into a scandal for Johnson, and Kennedy ultimately replaces him in his second term.

So who gained the most with JFK’s assassination?  Liberals.  For in JFK’s December 14, 1962 speech to the Economic Club of New York he sounded more like Ronald Reagan than LBJ.  Where he championed private spending, not government spending.  He favored tax cuts over tax credits to stimulate the economy.  He talked about increasing consumer spending via personal tax cuts.  And using corporate and personal tax cuts to increase investment and profits.  Yes, he talked about businesses making more profits.  So they would hire more.  Something no liberal would say.

Instead of the Ronald Reagan-like JFK we got one of the most corrupt politicians ever to become president.  LBJ.  According to LIFE Magazine.  And the greatest explosion of the welfare state since the New Deal.  The Great Society.  Turning the U.S. away from capitalism and towards European-style social democracy.

This is the great tragedy of the JFK assassination.  Thanks to that anti-capitalist, Cuba-loving, America-hating assassin who had once defected to the Soviet Union.  A nation long admired by liberals since the day of Joseph Stalin.  This is the great tragedy the leftist communist Lee Harvey Oswald gave us.  Lee Harvey Oswald gave us LBJ, the Great Society and the rise of state-capitalism in the United States.  Everything liberals want.  And conservatives eschew.  Making Lee Harvey Oswald the godfather of today’s American left.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The fact that 40% of Women prefer a Male Boss has upset some on the Left

Posted by PITHOCRATES - November 16th, 2013

Week in Review

According to a recent Gallup poll approximately 40% of Americans call themselves conservative.  While only about 21% call themselves liberal.  So there are approximately twice as many conservatives as liberals.  You wouldn’t believe that by watching television these days.  Or listening to the political discourse.  Where liberals talk as if they are in the majority.  And conservatives were just some lunatic fringe.  But we should remember that 40% number.  For it may be very relevant these days (see When It Comes to Female Bosses, Women Can Be Their Own Worst Enemy by Alexander Abad-Santos posted 11/11/2013 on The Atlantic Wire).

According to a poll from Gallup, 40 percent of the women say they prefer a male boss, 27 percent prefer a female one, and 32 percent have no preference. On the other hand, 29 percent of men polled prefer a male boss, 18 percent prefer a female one, and 51 percent had no preference.

The ideal number we all want is 100 percent to say gender doesn’t matter. Preference for a female boss is obviously a step up from no one wanting a female boss (in 1953, 66 percent of people polled preferred a male boss), but it’s not the ideal. The unavoidable question then becomes: Why don’t some women like it when women break the glass ceiling? In fact, there appears to be high demand for articles by women about how terrible it is to work for women. As Elizabeth Spiers wrote of the furious reaction to Sheryl Sandberg and Marissa Mayer, “Everyone applauds when they shatter that glass ceiling. Then they pick up the shards, and start cutting away.” It is often women who perpetuate the dumbest stereotypes about working with women.

This is probably why 40% of women prefer a male boss.  For here we have a poll showing what women feel like.  And 40% don’t like working for women.  Instead of accepting this is what women mean we blame them for perpetuating a dumb stereotype about working for women.  As if they said something they did not mean.  Had this poll said, say, 75% of women prefer a female boss they would be lauding the poll.  But because it says something they don’t like then, well, these women are perpetuating a silly stereotype.

In today’s business world some feminists are not satisfied with some women in the workplace.  Because some prefer working for a man as noted.  While some may go on maternity leave and decide to remain at home and be a full-time mother.  And women are doing a lot of other things that feminists frown upon.  Leaving a very narrow range of acceptable behavior for the woman in the workplace.  Perhaps this is why women prefer a male boss.  Because with them they can let their guard down.  And not worry about everything they say or do.  Especially if they are working for a card-carrying NOW feminist.  For doing your job well may not be enough.  Especially if you’re a conservative woman.  J mean, just imagine if your feminist boss heard you say you were pro-life.  Or voted for George W. Bush.  Twice.

Maybe the 40% of women in this poll are conservatives.  And the majority of women bosses are liberals.  For they chose a career over being a stay-at-home mother.  Which is more of a conservative thing.  Perhaps this is why 40% of women polled prefer working for a man.  Because men in business tend to be conservative.  And conservative women prefer working for a conservative.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , ,

The Nanny State wants to know what we’re Doing in our Bathrooms

Posted by PITHOCRATES - November 2nd, 2013

Week in Review

The American left is hell-bent on forcing national health care onto the American people.  Just like the European social democracies have.  Why?  Power.  They want to micromanage people’s lives.  Just as the European socialists want to do.  Because they are so much smarter than we are.  And know what’s best for us.  But it’s a slippery slope.  Today it’s our health care.  Tomorrow it may be our poop (see The Euro-flush: European Union to standardize toilets’ flush, set maximum volume of six litres by Bruno Waterfield, The Telegraph, posted 10/30/2013 on the National Post).

The European Union will unveil rules next week to standardize the flush on toilets, despite the admission that there are “very significant variations” on flushing habits across Europe “including cultural aspects…”

The EU standard follows almost three years of work by civil servants and difficulties in the workability of a one-size-fits-all rule for drains that vary greatly across the continent.

Do we really want people running our health care system that spent almost three years studying the optimum amount of water needed to flush poop?  What’s next?  Regulations defining the maximum permissible amount of toilet paper squares for wiping per defecation?  It sounds silly.  But you know there is a liberal somewhere thinking about it.  Sheryl Crow thought about it enough to make a joke about it.

Crow has suggested using “only one square per restroom visit, except, of course, on those pesky occasions where two to three could be required”.

So it’s coming if we keep sliding down this slippery slope.  The potty police.  Once they dictate the amount of water we may use to flush with they’ll be mandating a new toilet paper dispenser that will issue only one square per poop.  Perhaps with an Internet connection to the IRS for enforcement.  A subdivision of the Obamacare taskforce.  Whose motto will be ‘one poop one square’.  And woe to anyone who dares use a second square.  For they will feel the full wrath of the IRS.

Low-flow toilets are a top priority for the nanny state.  To save the environment.  By reducing our use of water.  But the solution of one problem leads to a new problem.  One of the unintended consequences liberals are so well known for.  Low-flow toilets use more water.  Because of multiple flushes.  For sometimes one flush just isn’t enough.  So what then?  A new toilet.  Perhaps one that that only allows three flushes per person per home.  One flush not enough?  Too bad.  Unless you can get someone else to give up one of their flushes. Or you want to pee in the backyard to save your flushes to keep your house from smelling like a backed-up toilet in a filthy public restroom.  You know there is a liberal somewhere thinking about this.  For they are studying the optimum amount of water needed to flush poop in the European Union.  And everything the European socialists do American liberals want to do, too.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

FT192: “One of the worst things about being conservative is enduring the unfunny comedy on liberal television.” —Old Pithy

Posted by PITHOCRATES - October 18th, 2013

Fundamental Truth

Marijuana and Youth make Juvenile Humor Funny

When I was a wee little one I used to read Mad Magazine.  Granted, most of the political humor was over my head.  But there was a lot of stuff in that magazine that made me laugh.  Many years later I can still remember some of that humor.  Including a piece about two sober people attending a George Carlin standup comedy show.

Marijuana had just migrated from the counterculture to the general population.  And into our schools.  A lot of school kids were getting high.  Which is what people did back then at concerts.  Rock concerts.  And standup comedy.  Especially with a counterculture icon like George Carlin.  With his seven dirty words you can’t say on television.  And all his trouble with ‘the man’ because of those seven dirty words.

At a George Carlin comedy show in that Mad Magazine piece they showed a crowd laughing their behinds off.  While the two sober people aren’t even cracking a smile.  Finding nothing funny.  What they hear is juvenile humor that might make a child laugh.  But not a mature adult.  Then the punch-line is something like this.  One of the two sober people says, “This is the last time we come to one of these concerts without getting stoned first.”

Liberal Audiences are like Children in Grade School who will laugh if someone calls their Teacher a Poopy Head

Smoking marijuana tends to make people laugh.  Almost without being able to stop laughing.  For everything is funny when high.  The more juvenile the funnier.  Where poopies and passing gas are just plain hilarious.  As their state of mind is not exactly at its sharpest level.  Regressing back to childhood.  And laughing at the same things they laughed at as a child.  Among other things.  Kids will always laugh when someone rips a loud one.  While adults are typically disgusted and just want to move away.

The young typically vote liberal.  And enjoy the liberal television shows.  The people laughing in the audiences of Saturday Night Live and The Daily Show are either young or liberal.  Or both.  Who don’t need to be stoned to laugh.  As long as it’s juvenile.  And it attacks conservatives.  Which they find funny.  Or know the proper thing for a liberal to do is to laugh whenever anyone makes fun of a conservative.

Liberal audiences are like those stoned people watching George Carlin in that Mad Magazine.  While conservatives are like those two sober people trying to figure out what’s so funny.  Those liberal audiences are like children in grade school who will laugh if someone calls their teacher a poopy head.  Only on liberal television they’re calling conservatives poopy heads.  While the grownups find little humor in this or being the butt of a joke.  And a bad joke at that.

It was really only in the Last Year that Liberal Late-Night Television made fun of President Obama

One of the worst things about being conservative is enduring the unfunny comedy on liberal television.  A lot of us grew up watching Saturday Night Live.  And laughed our asses off when Dan Aykroyd called Jane Curtain an ignorant slut on Point Counterpoint.  When poor Mr. Bill got squashed by Mr. Hand.  When Phil Hartman did Frank Sinatra in the Sinatra Group (I got chunks of guys like you in my stool).  Christopher Walken saying he needed more cowbell.  And so many more classic moments.  Over time, though, the show wasn’t as funny as it once was.  Especially for conservatives.

During the George W. Bush administration SNL was brutal.  They hated Bush.  And the writing showed it.  It was funny if you hated Bush, too.  But if you were a conservative you basically were insulted for 90 minutes of television.  And then there was Tina Fey.  And her Sarah Palin impersonation.  Where all the SNL viewers heard Fey say as Palin that she knew all about foreign policy because she could see Russia from her porch in Alaska.  Something Sarah Palin never said.  But the world believed she did after watching SNL.

Parody is one thing.  And SNL did it better than most.  With cast members like Phil Hartman, Will Ferrell and Darrell Hammond giving us some of the most memorable impersonations.  But through the years those parodies got ruder and meaner when it came to skewering those on the right.  But treaded lightly when it came to those on the left.  It was really only in the last year that liberal late-night television made fun of President Obama.  Causing those on the right to laugh their asses off.  Because for once liberals are not mean and rude but truly funny.  For it no doubt pains them to even lampoon those on the left.  And they only will do it when the comic material is just too good to pass up.  Unlike their attacks on the right.  Where Jon Stewart on The Daily Show calls those on the right the most vulgar of names.  While his audience laughs their asses off.  Just as if some kid called their teacher a poopy head.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

FT191: “Those who don’t trust a slick-talking salesman will trust a slick-talking liberal unconditionally.” —Old Pithy

Posted by PITHOCRATES - October 11th, 2013

Fundamental Truth

When it comes to our Financial Well-Being everyone looks out for Number One

People hate sales people.  Especially those who work on commission.  Who will lie to your face to sell you something you don’t want.  Or need.  Just so they can pocket a handsome commission.  They will smile and laugh with you.  Act like your new best friend.  Compliment you.  Tell you that you can trust them.  That they will take care of you.  And that those plumes of blue smoke blowing out of the used car you’re about to buy is normal.  And will go away once you start driving.

This is why we have the saying ‘buyer beware’.  Caveat emptor.   Because there are some unscrupulous types working for businesses.  So buyers have to remain on their guard.  For a slick-talking salesman could sell mittens year-round in Phoenix, Arizona.  They’re that good.  And if they can do that just think what they can sell you when you want something they’re selling.

So we don’t trust smooth-talkers.  Slick-talkers.  People who say they are our friends even though they don’t know us.  People who say they are looking out for us.  People who want to take care of us.  Because when it comes to our financial well-being there is a rule of thumb that holds true.  We look out for number one.  Ourselves.  And because we do we know others do, too.  Including that slick-talking salesman.

The most Successful Businesses are the Businesses with the most Satisfied Customers

“Fool me once shame on you.  Fool me twice shame on me.”  This is an expression that says two things.  A slick-talking person fooled us all at least once.  Often because we were young and naïve.  But we learned from our mistake.  Which is why when we are more mature and experienced the unscrupulous don’t fool us as much.  But as we age our mental faculties begin to fade.  We get forgetful.  Lonely.  And trusting.  Which is why it is the young and naïve AND the old and retired who the unscrupulous fool most.

So we don’t trust slick-talking people.  Because they’re trying to take advantage of us.  Especially our most vulnerable people.  Which is why when we hire a home improvement contractor we want to hire a contractor someone we know can personally vouch for.  Because these contractors are looking out for number one.  Just as we are looking out for number one.  Knowing this honest contractors want to do a good job to stand out from the unscrupulous ones.  So they can get testimonials from people we know and respect.  Because they don’t want to trick people with a slick sales pitch and costly advertising.  They want happy customers sending them more business for free.

This is why capitalism works.  Because it is less costly to be honest and please your customers.  For if businesses are honest and please their customers people will remain their customers.  And possibly refer new customers to them.  Which is why the most successful businesses are the businesses with the most satisfied customers.  If people get sick after eating in a restaurant it will be a long time before they return to that restaurant.  If they ever return to that restaurant.  And if people stop going to a restaurant that serves food that makes its customers sick this restaurant will eventually lose all their customers.  Except the few that wander in off the street.  Or never read an online review.

While the Mature and Experienced tend to vote Republican the Young and Naïve tend to vote Democrat

Young people typically are Democrats.  As they see Republicans as nothing but a bunch of old fogies.  Like their parents.  Who wouldn’t know how to have fun if it came up to them and bit them in the ass.  Democrats, on the other hand, do.  They’re cool.  They’re slick.  They know how to say all the right things.  They mock those Republicans and make the young laugh.  Especially when those old fogies try to be funny and hip to attract the youth vote.  They just can’t do it.  Not like the suave, cool, hip and slick-talking Democrats.

Where do young liberals get their news from?  Well, more of them get it from Comedy Central’s The Daily Show than they do from Fox News.  Where Jon Stewart is the epitome of cool, hip and funny.  While those on Fox News are more like their killjoy parents.  In fact all the late-night comedy shows do well with this demographic.  Because while the right poorly articulates itself to the young the left does it perfectly.  Why, they could sell mittens year-round in Phoenix, Arizona.  They’re that good.  And even though a lot of liberal Democrats are old fossils themselves they don’t have to be cool and hip to get the youth vote.  Because the entertainment industry and the mainstream media convinces the most vulnerable that the Democrats are their best friend.  And say things to compliment them like they are our future.  That they are responsible enough to have all the sex they want.  That they can trust the left.  And that the left will take care of them.

The young will not trust any business.  Be they honest or unscrupulous.  But they will trust a slick-talking liberal unconditionally even though liberals are looking out for number one.  All the while failing to see how all the things that are to make our lives better just happen to make the lives of those in government better.  Income redistribution sends more money to government.  Environmental regulations send more money to government.  And Obamacare sends more money to government.  See the pattern?  And unlike the business person trying to build an honest reputation the left will lie, steal and cheat to get their way.  “If you like your health insurance you can keep your health insurance.”  And what makes their actions particularly insidious is that they target the most vulnerable.  While the mature and experienced tend to vote Republican the young and naïve AND the old and retired tend to vote Democrat.  The former because they are young and naïve.  The latter because the left has them terrified that Republicans will take away their Social Security and Medicare.  So they vote Democrat out of fear.  Even though doing so will eventually bankrupt Social Security and Medicare.  While those in government continue to live a better life.  Because a slick-talking liberal can sell just about anything.  Including a liberal ruling class.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Democrats won’t Negotiate because they want to make the Republicans their Bitch

Posted by PITHOCRATES - October 6th, 2013

Week in Review

The Democrats don’t like sharing power.  Or bipartisanship.  They miss the good old days when they controlled everything.  Both houses of Congress.  And the White House.  As well as the three networks.  Before there was Rush Limbaugh and talk radio.  And cable television.  Which let other voices be heard.  Something they hate.  Why?  Because they have a liberal agenda in a country that is only about 21% liberal.  So they don’t like debate.  Because they are trying to sell what the masses don’t want.  Which is why they cloak their intentions in misleading words.  More government control over our lives is called investment.  Raising tax rates is leveling the playing field.  Making everyone pay their fair share.  And opposition voices are extremists.  Hate peddlers.  Who should be censored.  Etc.

So liberals lie and deceive to pass a liberal agenda the people don’t want.  And they really get upset when they can’t get their way.  For liberals are not manly men.  They weren’t athletic enough to play sports.  Tough or brave enough to go into the military.  On Saturday Night Live a character impersonating an Arnold Schwarzenegger bodybuilder type called these men girly men.  Men like Alan Alda who ate quiche (at the time there was a saying that real men did not eat quiche).  Going further back to the days of Charles Atlas liberals were the skinny guy getting sand kicked into his face.  That is, liberals were the victims of bullying.  Who weren’t manly enough to stand up against a bully.  So when they grew up they went into politics.  To wield a different kind of power.  The power of the state.  So the bullied could become the bully.

We could see this in Breaking Bad.  Walter White was a nice guy that finished last in life.  Where people walked all over him and gave him no respect.  And if that wasn’t bad enough this loser then gets cancer.  But then things change.  And Walter White goes through a transformation and mans up.  Going from bullied to bully.  While destroying lives all around him (see Die Like a Man: The Toxic Masculinity of Breaking Bad by Laura Hudson posted 10/5/2013 on Wired).

Masculinity in Breaking Bad is a brittle thing, one so terrified of weakness that any display of vulnerability must be punished, and any slight against another man’s power answered with violence – or else perceived as a weakness. We see it in the hyper-masculine culture of both the neo-Nazis and the drug cartel, where the air is always dripping with machismo and vengeance is considered an almost sacred duty.

This model of manhood also requires control not only over your own life, but over the lives of others. Think about all of the most iconic moments of the show, the badass lines that made us want to pump our fists: “Say my name.” “I am the danger.” “I am the one who knocks.” “I won.” Every single time, it’s about dominance – not just about having power, but about taking power away from someone else…

In short, calling a man a “bitch” is designed to diminish his power by comparing him to a woman. It implies that women are weaker and less powerful, and also that they are to be used and dominated. “Bitch” is linked to exploitation, to submission; if you make someone your bitch, you force them to submit to your will, in one way or another.

If we learned anything from the kind, brilliant Gale, it’s that the Walter White who dies at the end of the show would have had no problem shooting the Walter White of the first episode in the head if he got in his way. When the nerd who was bullied becomes the bully, should we really feel a sense of satisfaction? Or should we take a deep, soul-searching look at the sort of system that makes underdogs like Walt feel like the only way they can be men is by destroying and dominating everyone around them?

Liberals have a lot in common with Walter White.  Who will not be satisfied until they make the Republicans their bitch.  These girly men (i.e., liberal Democrats) who have for the most part accomplished nothing in their lives other than buy elections have no intentions of giving the Republicans anything.  When the Republicans meet with the Democrats to negotiate the Democrats simply refuse to negotiate.  Even President Obama said he will not negotiate.  Saying the Republicans must first submit to his will.  Give him everything he wants first then he will negotiate with them.  After which, of course, there will be nothing left to negotiate.

The liberals are not saying it but you can hear them say it.  “Say my name, bitch.”  “I am the danger, bitch.”  “I am the one who knocks, bitch.”  And “I will win, bitch.”  For liberals are not going to be that bullied kid in high school anymore.  They’re the bully now.  They have the power.  And they want to emasculate the opposition.  The jocks and the military types.  Who tormented them in high school.  But not anymore.  For it’s payback time, bitch.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

« Previous Entries   Next Entries »