Week in Review
The establishment Republicans are getting sick and tired of conservatives. Their base. And they’re starting to speak out against them in harsher tones they rarely if ever use on Democrats (see Why The GOP Civil War Just Exploded Out Into The Open — Again by Brett LoGiurato posted 12/12/2013 on Business Insider).
On Dec. 12, House Speaker John Boehner finally conveyed the bewildered sentiment that so many Republicans shared as far back as August.
Speaking at a press conference where he said outside conservative groups have “lost all credibility,” Boehner referenced comments that Heritage Action CEO Michael Needham made toward the end of October’s federal government shutdown — one that Boehner suggested Republicans were pushed into by the “defund Obamacare”-happy outside conservative groups.
“Everybody understands that we will not be able to repeal this law until 2017,” Needham had told Fox News — as in, repeal isn’t possible until a Republican is in the White House. To Boehner, that was a tacit admission that these groups knew their strategy was unworkable.
Well, that’s the problem the conservatives have with the establishment Republicans, isn’t it? Winning the White House. Which they haven’t been able to do with the last two establishment Republican candidates. Both who proudly proclaimed that they could reach across the aisle and work with Democrats. Which basically meant that they would help the Democrats pass their liberal agenda. By NOT trying to advance a conservative agenda. What 40% of the electorate wants.
Being that about 40% of the electorate is conservative these Democrat-lite candidates didn’t rally the Republican base. The 21% of the electorate that is liberal were never going to vote for a Republican. And the moderates in the middle who lean Democrat vote for the real Democrat candidate. Not the Democrat-lite candidate. Always.
This is why the conservatives in Congress are a bit exasperated with the establishment Republicans. Because they lose the election that matters. By NOT running a conservative candidate. And they never push back on the liberal agenda as they are so afraid that the media will say bad things about them. Or liberals won’t like them. It’s either that or the establishment Republicans, like liberals, want big government. Because they, too, like the money and the power. And don’t want any of that limited government nonsense. That thing our Founding Fathers gave us.
When was the last time that the Republicans won by a landslide? That’s right. When they ran a conservative candidate. Ronald Reagan. Another conservative the Republican establishment didn’t like.
Tags: Boehner, conservatives, Democrat-lite, Democrats, establishment Republicans, liberal, Liberal Agenda, Republicans, White House
Liberals pack the Judiciary with Liberal Judges to Write Law they can’t Write in Congress
Harry Reid and the Democrats went nuclear today. Changing the Senate rules for the first time since the Founding. To increase the power of those in the majority. So they can run roughshod over those in the minority. Thanks to the poor launch of Obamacare. And the sinking realization that because the Democrats have so angered the people in the process of implementing the Affordable Care Act (the president and Democrats lied and people are losing their health insurance and doctors) that Democrats up for election in 2014 are going to be thrown out with extreme prejudice. Turning the Senate over to the Republicans. Hence the need to go nuclear now.
It’s no secret the left legislates from the bench. Using judges to write legislation that Congress won’t. Such as making abortion legal via Roe v. Wade. That was a law made not by the law-makers. The legislature. Congress. But by liberal judges on the bench. Who are to interpret law. Not write it. But in Roe v. Wade, as in so many other laws that came to be that Congress refused to write, judges wrote law in their legal rulings. Allowing the liberal minority to make their will the law of the land.
America is a center-right country. Which means there are more conservatives than liberals. In fact, only about 21% of the people identify themselves as liberal while about 40% of the people identify themselves as conservative (see Conservatives Remain the Largest Ideological Group in U.S. by Lydia Saad posted 1/12/2012 on Gallup). Yet this 21% has implemented a lot of their liberal agenda. How? Liberal judges. The key to changing the country against the will of the people. When you can’t get the people’s representatives to write your laws you turn to the judiciary. Which is why Harry Reid went nuclear today. So they can pack the judiciary with liberal judges. Before they lose the Senate. So they will be able to write law from the bench that they won’t be able to do after they lose the Senate.
The Filibuster is the Last Line of Defense for the Minority
The filibuster is a stalling tactic. A tool the minority can use to prevent the majority from running roughshod over them. To protect minority rights. For majority rule can be dangerous. The majority could write law that restricts the rights of the minority. Don’t like the internal combustion engine? Well, the majority could write legislation for a costly carbon tax. Of course, the Democrats don’t have a majority in the House. But they do have one in the Senate. Which confirms the president’s judicial appointments. So if the president stacks the courts with liberal judges the left can get their carbon tax. By writing regulations for a carbon tax instead of legislation. And having the courts make that regulation law. With the left saying that they had that right under their environmental regulatory powers. And if you don’t like that sue us.
This is why the left wants to stack the courts with liberals. Who may or may not be actual judges. For they don’t want judges to interpret law. They want them to write law that Congress won’t. If the right sues the government for exceeding their constitutional authority and the case ends up in a court packed with liberal judges the right will lose. And the unconstitutional regulation will become law. Despite the Republican-controlled House.
The right has been holding up some exceptionally liberal Obama appointees to the bench. Frustrating the left. Because they can’t move their liberal agenda through the Republican held House of Representatives. While their plan B—stacking the courts—was being blocked by the Republicans because the Democrats did not have 60 Senators in the Senate. For if they did they could invoke cloture. End debate. And force a vote. Which they would, of course, win. Making the filibuster the last line of defense for the minority. For if the judicial appointment only appeals to the 21% of the population the minority can filibuster until they withdraw the appointment. And appoint someone that doesn’t appeal ONLY to 21% of the population.
When the Democrats were in the Minority they said Opposition to the Republicans was Patriotic
Back when the Republicans held the Senate during the George W. Bush administration the Democrats were holding up Bush appointees. The Republicans broached the subject of the nuclear option. And the left attacked Republicans. Calling it a power grab. An affront to the Founding Fathers. The worst thing that could happen to our republic. Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and other Democrats spoke on the record opposing the nuclear option. But that was then. This is now. After the rollout of Obamacare. And the very likely possibility that the Democrats will lose control of the Senate in 2014. Now Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, et al are all for the nuclear option.
Because the Republicans are so partisan the left had no choice. They simply wouldn’t rubber-stamp the liberal agenda. So they had no choice but to grab power. To run roughshod over those in the minority in Congress. So the minority in the nation can impose their rule on the majority. When the Democrats were in the minority in Congress they said opposition to the Republicans was patriotic. That it made the republic healthier. Locking the Congress into gridlock because they couldn’t get their way was fulfilling the vision of the Founding Fathers. By preventing one-party rule.
But all that changes when they are in the majority. And those in the 21% are fine with it. Those in the mainstream media. Hollywood. Late-night television. Even the audiences of the late-night television shows. Who are all for debate when they are out of power. But are fine with one-party rule when they are in power. Because they believe that their side is the only side that matters. Which is decidedly NOT what the Founding Fathers envisioned. The left believes everyone should think like they think. And if they don’t there should be laws to compel people to act like they (the left) think they should act. Even if it requires violating the Constitution. Like Obamacare forces people to buy something against their will for the first time in the history of the republic. But expecting people to pay for their own birth control instead of forcing others to pay for it? Why, that’s an affront to the Founding Fathers. Making any law-violating power grab acceptable. As long as it’s the left doing the law-violating and the power-grabbing. For the left believe the end justifies the means. Just like the Nazis did. The communists. And other tyrannical regimes have throughout time.
Tags: Barack Obama, Congress, conservatives, courts, Democrats, filibuster, Founding, Founding Fathers, Harry Reid, Hillary Clinton, judges, judiciary, legislate from the bench, legislature, Liberal Agenda, liberal judges, liberals, majority, minority, Nancy Pelosi, nuclear, nuclear option, Obamacare, one-party rule, power grab, regulations, Republic, Republicans, Senate, Senate rules
Bill Clinton said in a 2005 Interview that the 1981 Israeli Bombing of an Iraqi Nuke Plant was a Good Thing
“Bush lied people died.” You heard that a lot all during President Bush’s presidency. The left was shouting it from the mountain top. “Bush lied people died!” Saying that the dumbest man ever to occupy the White House fooled the most brilliant people in the world—liberal Democrats—into voting for the invasion of Iraq. Because Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction (WMD).
Saddam Hussein used WMDs on March 16, 1988. It was the closing days of the Iran-Iraq War. In the Kurdish town of Halabja in Northern Iraq. Hussein was no friend of the Kurds. And the Kurds had no love for Hussein. Which is why Kurdish guerillas fought with the Iranians against Saddam Hussein. And after the Iranians took this Kurdish town in northern Iraq Hussein had no problem with committing an act of genocide in Halabja. Which he did on March 16, 1988. The largest chemical attack against a civilian population in history.
On June 7, 1981, Israel carried out a surprise bombing of an Iraqi nuclear reactor under construction. For they feared a Saddam Hussein with nuclear weapons. During the Persian Gulf War the Americans bombed what was left of that nuclear reactor. For they, too, feared a Saddam Hussein with nuclear weapons. Though publicly condemned by pretty much everyone at the time of the bombing most were probably happy the Israelis did that unpleasant task for them. Even Bill Clinton said in a 2005 interview that the bombing was a good thing.
Saddam Hussein violated the Terms of the Gulf War Cease Fire by not Documenting the Destruction of his WMDs
The Congress saw the same intelligence the Bush administration saw in the run-up to the Iraq War. It was so convincing that Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, John Kerry and Harry Reid voted to give George W. Bush the authority to invade Iraq. Who all feared a Saddam Hussein with WMDs. For as bad as 9/11 was it could have been worse if the terrorists had WMDs. Hussein had WMDs. And he had no moral compunction against using them. As proven by Halabja. Making him a very dangerous man in a world where terrorists who hate America are in the market for WMDs.
So there was a very strong case against Saddam Hussein. Especially when you throw in his violation of the terms of the Gulf War cease fire agreement. In particular the documentation of his destruction of his WMDs that he agreed to do. Which was a tantamount admission of having them. WMDs. But he didn’t document the destruction of his WMD stockpiles. Because he did not destroy them. Which meant one thing. He still had weapons of mass destruction. Which is probably why Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, John Kerry and Harry Reid voted to give George W. Bush the authority to invade Iraq. For they were terrified…of being on the wrong side of history when those WMDs they knew he had were found.
Well, we found no WMDs in Iraq. Probably because Hussein shipped them off to Syria for safekeeping. Assuming he would remain in power after the Iraq War. Just as he remained in power after the Gulf War. After the invasion nonsense was done he could go to Syria and take his WMDs back. And perhaps get them into the hands of a terrorist for use against an American city. To retaliate for the big headache George W. Bush gave him. Of course his subsequent capture and execution put a wrench into all future plans he may have had.
Liberals play Fast and Loose with the Truth as Telling the Truth rarely helps the Liberal Agenda
President Obama made some promises about Obamacare during the Affordable Care Act debate. Because the people were against it. They didn’t want anything near quasi national health care. So he kept saying that Obamacare wasn’t a government takeover of our health care system. And that it would actually make the private health insurance industry better. It would cover more. While costing less. And the best thing about the Affordable Care Act was this (see Obama’s pledge that ‘no one will take away’ your health plan by Glenn Kessler posted 10/30/2013 on The Washington Post).
“That means that no matter how we reform health care, we will keep this promise to the American people: If you like your doctor, you will be able to keep your doctor, period. If you like your health-care plan, you’ll be able to keep your health-care plan, period. No one will take it away, no matter what.”
The Fact Checker on The Washington Post gave this statement Four Pinocchios. Their highest level of dishonesty. Or ‘whoppers’. As About The Fact Checker calls Four Pinocchios. Basically saying the president lied about Obamacare to get the Affordable Care Act passed into law. And lied again to win reelection. For the election results may have been different if he had told the truth. If he had said that some will lose their doctors and some will lose their health-care plan. If he had said that premiums and deductibles would rise. If he had would the people who had insurance and doctors they liked vote for him? No. Probably not.
So President Obama and the Democrats told lies that deceived a great many people to get what he couldn’t get by telling the truth. Obamacare. One of the most divisive pieces of legislation ever passed in Congress. Passed on purely partisan lines. No Republicans voted for the Affordable Care Act. Unlike the legislation that gave George W. Bush the authority to invade Iraq. Which had bipartisan support. With both Republicans and Democrats voting for it. Yet the left said, “Bush lied people died.” But when it comes to President Obama’s flagrant lies about the Affordable Care Act all you hear are crickets from the left. Because for them the truth is whatever they say it is. And a lie is whatever they say it is. For the only way to pass their liberal agenda is to play fast and loose with the truth. As telling the truth rarely helps the liberal agenda.
Tags: Affordable Care Act, Bill Clinton, Bush, Bush lied people died, Democrats, Four Pinocchios, George W. Bush, Gulf War, Halabja, Harry Reid, health care plan, Hillary Clinton, Hussein, invasion of Iraq, Iranians, Iraq, Iraq War, Iraqi nuclear reactor, Israel, Joe Biden, John Kerry, Kurdish, Kurds, Liberal Agenda, Liberal Democrats, Obamacare, Persian Gulf War, President Obama, Republicans, Saddam Hussein, telling the truth, terrorists, weapons of mass destruction, WMD
Week in Review
The Democrats don’t like sharing power. Or bipartisanship. They miss the good old days when they controlled everything. Both houses of Congress. And the White House. As well as the three networks. Before there was Rush Limbaugh and talk radio. And cable television. Which let other voices be heard. Something they hate. Why? Because they have a liberal agenda in a country that is only about 21% liberal. So they don’t like debate. Because they are trying to sell what the masses don’t want. Which is why they cloak their intentions in misleading words. More government control over our lives is called investment. Raising tax rates is leveling the playing field. Making everyone pay their fair share. And opposition voices are extremists. Hate peddlers. Who should be censored. Etc.
So liberals lie and deceive to pass a liberal agenda the people don’t want. And they really get upset when they can’t get their way. For liberals are not manly men. They weren’t athletic enough to play sports. Tough or brave enough to go into the military. On Saturday Night Live a character impersonating an Arnold Schwarzenegger bodybuilder type called these men girly men. Men like Alan Alda who ate quiche (at the time there was a saying that real men did not eat quiche). Going further back to the days of Charles Atlas liberals were the skinny guy getting sand kicked into his face. That is, liberals were the victims of bullying. Who weren’t manly enough to stand up against a bully. So when they grew up they went into politics. To wield a different kind of power. The power of the state. So the bullied could become the bully.
We could see this in Breaking Bad. Walter White was a nice guy that finished last in life. Where people walked all over him and gave him no respect. And if that wasn’t bad enough this loser then gets cancer. But then things change. And Walter White goes through a transformation and mans up. Going from bullied to bully. While destroying lives all around him (see Die Like a Man: The Toxic Masculinity of Breaking Bad by Laura Hudson posted 10/5/2013 on Wired).
Masculinity in Breaking Bad is a brittle thing, one so terrified of weakness that any display of vulnerability must be punished, and any slight against another man’s power answered with violence – or else perceived as a weakness. We see it in the hyper-masculine culture of both the neo-Nazis and the drug cartel, where the air is always dripping with machismo and vengeance is considered an almost sacred duty.
This model of manhood also requires control not only over your own life, but over the lives of others. Think about all of the most iconic moments of the show, the badass lines that made us want to pump our fists: “Say my name.” “I am the danger.” “I am the one who knocks.” “I won.” Every single time, it’s about dominance – not just about having power, but about taking power away from someone else…
In short, calling a man a “bitch” is designed to diminish his power by comparing him to a woman. It implies that women are weaker and less powerful, and also that they are to be used and dominated. “Bitch” is linked to exploitation, to submission; if you make someone your bitch, you force them to submit to your will, in one way or another.
If we learned anything from the kind, brilliant Gale, it’s that the Walter White who dies at the end of the show would have had no problem shooting the Walter White of the first episode in the head if he got in his way. When the nerd who was bullied becomes the bully, should we really feel a sense of satisfaction? Or should we take a deep, soul-searching look at the sort of system that makes underdogs like Walt feel like the only way they can be men is by destroying and dominating everyone around them?
Liberals have a lot in common with Walter White. Who will not be satisfied until they make the Republicans their bitch. These girly men (i.e., liberal Democrats) who have for the most part accomplished nothing in their lives other than buy elections have no intentions of giving the Republicans anything. When the Republicans meet with the Democrats to negotiate the Democrats simply refuse to negotiate. Even President Obama said he will not negotiate. Saying the Republicans must first submit to his will. Give him everything he wants first then he will negotiate with them. After which, of course, there will be nothing left to negotiate.
The liberals are not saying it but you can hear them say it. “Say my name, bitch.” “I am the danger, bitch.” “I am the one who knocks, bitch.” And “I will win, bitch.” For liberals are not going to be that bullied kid in high school anymore. They’re the bully now. They have the power. And they want to emasculate the opposition. The jocks and the military types. Who tormented them in high school. But not anymore. For it’s payback time, bitch.
Tags: bullied, bully, bullying, Democrats, dominance, girly-men, liberal, Liberal Agenda, manly men, masculinity, negotiate, real men did not eat quiche, Republicans, submit, Walter White
Global Warming Activists are Anti-Capitalists who want the US to be a European Social Democracy
Democrats lie. It’s the only way they can advance a liberal agenda the people don’t want. In the Nineties they warned us about impending doom from manmade global warming. They said their science told them that within a decade global temperatures would rise so much that the polar icecaps would melt. And the rising oceans would flood our coastlines. While the hotter temperatures would turn our fertile farmland into desert. The left wasn’t saying this could happen. They were saying it was going to happen.
Well, it didn’t. Every dire prediction they made didn’t happen. The polar icecaps are still there. Our coastlines are still there. Our farmlands are still fertile. In fact, they’re so fertile that America has an obesity problem. Because we’re eating too much food. And we’re eating too much food because we are growing so much food thanks to those fertile farmlands. Why, we’re growing so much food that we’re using a large portion of our corn crop to make ethanol to burn in our cars.
So either the global warming crowd was so very wrong. Or they were lying the whole time. Why would they lie? Well, who exactly are the global warming activists? They’re not Republicans. They’re not conservatives. They’re liberals. And it just so happens that they want the same thing liberal democrats want. An ever growing regulatory environment strangling our businesses. For these people are, generally, anti-capitalists. Who want the United States to become a European social democracy. Where there is fairness. Egalitarianism. And no rich people. Other than those in government.
The Climate Scientists were wrong about Manmade Global Warming and their Hurricane Predictions
Hurricane Katrina was the deadliest and costliest hurricane to hit the United States. And the left said, “See? Global warming.” Not only that they said this was only the beginning. And because of manmade global warming we could expect a lot more Hurricane Katrinas. In fact, it was a sure thing. Manmade global warming was going to fill the hurricane season with a lot more hurricanes. And a lot of them would be Hurricane Katrina bad. Or worse. And you could take that to the bank. Because their mathematical models proved this.
Well, it turned out these mathematical models were wrong. Since Katrina we’ve had nothing but mild hurricane seasons. Exactly the opposite of what the climate scientists said we would have. In fact, it took 7 years before we experienced another storm nearly as destructive as Katrina. Hurricane Sandy. Or Superstorm Sandy. As it wasn’t quite a hurricane. Though it was destructive. It wasn’t Hurricane Katrina destructive. Like the climate scientists said most hurricanes would be like following Katrina.
So either the climate scientists were just very bad at science. Or they’ve been lying. Or both. During the Seventies these same brilliant scientists were upset that the world’s governments wouldn’t heed their warnings and start storing food for the coming ice age. For they said it was a sure thing. And there was nothing we could do about it. Then another decade or so later these same climate scientists were warning us about global warming. Which was then a sure thing. As global cooling and ice ages was so yesterday’s climate.
The Left is Good at Lying because they keep the People Ignorant and Gullible
Today business is strangled by environmental regulations. The government is waging war against inexpensive and reliable coal-fired power plants. While spending our tax dollars on costly and unreliable renewable energy. Australia has a carbon tax. And Europe has an emissions trading scheme. To charge power plants, businesses, airlines, etc., for the carbon they exhaust into the atmosphere. Adding layers and layers of costs to everything we buy. All because the climate scientists said we were causing global warming. Warming the same planet they said was cooling a few decades earlier.
They were wrong. As they are on most things. In fact, they are some of the most ignorant smart people in the world. The political left. Who want to run our lives because they are so much smarter than we are. Yet their track record shows that they are not smarter than us. Or that they’re just very good liars. Who can tell the same lie over and over again and people will believe it. Like global warming. Or their Keynesian economic policies. Policies that have given us the Great Depression. The stagflation of the Seventies. Japan’s Lost Decade. The dot-com bubble and recession. The subprime mortgage crisis. And, of course, the European sovereign debt crisis.
Yet the left is very good at winning elections. And that’s because they are such good liars. For all of their policies are politically driven. They don’t care about manmade global warming. They just want to control the economy. So they can pick winners and losers. And enrich themselves. Which is why they will tell the same lie over and over again. Because they are so good at lying. And the people are so gullible. Because they are so ignorant. Thanks to our public schools. Which are controlled by the left (the teacher unions aren’t filling Republican campaign coffers). The problem with lying to advance your agenda, though, is that you can’t keep everyone ignorant forever. Eventually people grow up. They raise families and feel the direct result of the left’s costly policies. They live through 2 decades where there was no warming. They see few hurricanes despite predictions of record hurricane seasons. That’s why the left works so hard for the youth vote. Because they are just too young to have experienced these things. Young and dumb. The ideal Democrat voter. Who vote for the party that says sex is okay. And drugs aren’t that bad. Unlike their parents. Who are old enough to have experienced the left being so wrong for so long.
Tags: anti-capitalists, Carbon, climate, climate scientist, coastlines, Democrats, environmental regulation, European social democracy, Global Warming, Hurricane Katrina, hurricane season, ice age, liars, Liberal Agenda, manmade global warming, polar icecaps, social democracy
Far Fewer People pay to read Papers Online than they once Paid to read them in Print
The Washington Post has a market capitalization of $4.2 billion. Which is the number of issued shares of publically traded stock multiplied by its stock price. In other words, this is what the shareholders of The Washington Post believe the paper is worth. Yet on Monday they sold the paper for $250 million. Which is 94% less that its market capitalization.
This follows the sale of The Boston Globe. Which The New York Times sold for $70 million. After buying it for $1.1 billion in 1993. Coincidentally, a loss of 94%. The Washington Post and The Boston Globe show how newspapers have lost their value. Each paper suffered huge declines in circulation. And with fewer people reading these newspapers advertisers placed their ads elsewhere. Which led to tens of millions in annual losses. Common in much of the established print media. Why?
In part because of the Internet. People like getting their news online. Free. Some papers have installed pay-walls for their online content. Some more successful than others. But far fewer people pay to read these papers online like they once paid to read them in print. On paper. Old-school style. Yes, online content is instantaneous. Up to date. Free (much of it). And you don’t get that black ink on your fingers when reading the paper. But is there something else causing papers like The Boston Globe and The Washington Post to fail so miserably? Perhaps.
Approximately 75% of all Americans do NOT call themselves Liberal
The problems these papers are having are caused bytheir liberal bias. This is why so many people are refusing to pay to pass the pay-wall. And why they aren’t buying the print version. Because today there is choice. A lot of choice. And a lot of choice that doesn’t insult them on a daily basis.
The (once) leading newspapers, the television news networks, the public schools, our colleges and universities, Hollywood, television and the music industry (apart from country music) leans left. People are bombarded with a liberal agenda from school to television to the movies to their music. Making the liberal agenda appear to be the mainstream thought. But it’s not.
According to Gallup the ideological breakdown of the country in 2011 (and 2010, 2009, 2004, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1988, 1997 and 1996) was approximately 40% conservative. While 35% identified themselves as moderate in 2011. And those calling themselves liberal came to 21% in 2011. So nearly half of all Americans call themselves conservative. While 75% of all Americans do NOT call themselves liberal. So is it a surprise that newspapers with a liberal slant that insult approximately 75% of the population are failing?
The Boston Globe and The Washington Post are Failing because People don’t like Elitists talking down to Them
The American people don’t like the liberal agenda. Even liberals don’t like the liberal agenda when it affects their lives. Matt Damon is a diehard liberal. And champion of our public schools. Loving their liberal agenda. But when it comes to his own kids, surprise, surprise, they go to a private school. Just like President Obama’s daughters. The president is such a fierce supporter of our public schools that he ended the school voucher system in Washington DC. Keeping those kids in the public school system. Because he took away their choice. While exercising his choice with his own daughters. As the president believes that private schools are better than public education. And he wants to keep the poor people out of them. Which is what cancelling the school voucher system did.
And just recently we’ve seen Congress and their staff get an exemption from Obamacare. The same Obamacare they’re forcing on the masses. But those working in Congress have the best health insurance plans known to mankind. And they’re expensive. So much so that the government (i.e., the taxpayers) pays 75% of their premium costs. They liked their plans. They wanted to keep their plans. But an unattended consequence of Obamacare put them in the same boat as the rest of us when it came to their health insurance. And it was just a gosh-darn shame that these people would have to pay an enormous amount of money for their gold-plated-Cadillac plans. So the executive branch of the federal government will pay (i.e., the taxpayers will pay) their 75% subsidy so they can keep the plans they like. Without seeing their premiums going up. Unlike the rest of us.
This is why papers like The Boston Globe and The Washington Post are failing. Because people don’t like elitists talking down to them. Telling us that we don’t know what’s best for us. Or that we are simply too stupid to know that things we don’t like are actually good for us. Like our public schools. And Obamacare. While the very people telling us this are exempting themselves from these very things.
Tags: choice, Congress, conservative, elitists, health insurance, liberal, Liberal Agenda, liberal bias, liberal slant, news, newspapers, Obamacare, online, papers, pay-wall, print, print media, private school, public schools, school voucher system, The Boston Globe, The Washington Post
Our Public Schools teach our Children that Capitalism is Bad and Government is Good
The Democrats want some form of national childcare. President Obama just said that he wanted 4 year olds in preschool. Some political operative just made a video saying that we need to destroy the notion that children belong to their parents. And get people thinking more collectively about their children. That they belong to the community. Not to their parents. So why this push to take children away from their parents and place them into institutions more controlled by the state? For one reason. To make them think ‘correctly’.
Our public schools teach our children at an early age about global warming. Why? There’s nothing children can do about it. And it’s likely not man-made. For the glaciers moved their farthest before man ever put warming emissions into the atmosphere. So why scare them of an impending global warming apocalypse? Filling their heads with things to give them nightmares? Because it is useful to make them fear global warming. Useful how? Well, who is it that is supposedly causing global warming? Businesses. Corporations. In general, capitalism. In particular, unfettered capitalism. Which teaches children what? That if left to its own devises unfettered capitalism will destroy the world. So we need government to act like cops. To protect these children, their families and the world from these evil and greedy corporations that are trying to kill people with global warming. Just so they can make a buck.
This is what they’re teaching our children in the public schools. That unfettered capitalism is unfair. Cruel. And will kill us to make a buck. So our children learn the evils of the profit incentive. And the goodness of government. They teach our children how FDR, LBJ and President Obama made the country better. By preventing the evil corporations from running wild in pursuit of profits. They don’t teach them how America became the world’s number one economy with the greatest liberty and highest standard of liberty because of unfettered capitalism. Or why this was the reason people immigrated to the United States. No. Instead they teach them to fear corporations. And support unions. Because unions like government stop the evil corporations from hurting people to make a buck. They’ll even hold picket signs for their teachers when they go on strike. Teachers repeat this lesson over and over again. Corporations bad. Capitalism bad. Unions good. Government good. So when they start voting they will vote ‘correctly’.
Someone has to Teach People to have Negative Views of Republicans because they’re not Born with Them
So this is why the Democrats want to take children away from their parents. So they can start teaching them how to think ‘correctly’. So they will vote ‘correctly’. And when our kids get to college they take it up a notch. Back in the Sixties radicals protested at college campuses. Protested the Vietnam War. Wearing shirts with pictures of communist icons like Chairman Mao and Chez Guevara. They wanted to establish communism in the United States. They hated the profit-incentive. And corporate America. They wanted to abolish private property. Make everything communal. They even lived in communes. Just like the communists they so admired. Even though the communist utopias in the Soviet Union and The People’s Republic of China oppressed and killed their people if they didn’t think ‘correctly’.
They wanted a world where everyone had whatever they needed without having to work for the man. So they could spend their days the way they believed people should pass their days. Getting high, engaging in free love and singing songs about love. These radicals then changed their tactics. Instead of fighting the system from the outside they began fighting it from the inside. By becoming college professors. Now they are teaching our kids. And writing the curriculum. Even those who went to jail for acts of domestic terrorism are joining the faculty at our colleges. And those who avoided jail on a technicality. Liberal Democrats revere these people. And the students they’re programming to become good liberal Democrats love them. For they, too, want to enjoy a life full of drugs and sex. They see these radical professors as enlightened. For they find nothing wrong with enjoying the moment. Instead of sacrificing for the future. Like their parents did. Who always frowned on their having a good time. Most colleges today lean left. And the radical Left keeps out the riff raff. Conservatives. Who are just too much like these students’ parents. And bestows tenure on those who think as radically as they do. While denying it to those who don’t. Those conservatives.
Conservative students have recorded some of these classes. Where we can hear liberal professors telling their captive audience that Republicans are all racist white men. And are the most inflexible in their thinking. Stubborn. And mean spirited. That they hate minorities, the poor and women. Even want to prevent them from voting. They want to put blacks back at the back of the bus. And women back into the Fifties where they’re barefoot and pregnant. Are these isolated incidents? Or is this what they teach all of our children? Well, if you watch the Daily Show, Saturday Night Live, most any television sitcom, most any Hollywood movie or watch the network news you have to believe this teaching is pervasive. As no one is born with political views someone had to teach these people to have these negative views of Republicans. And who teaches our kids? Our public schools. And our colleges.
Liberal Democrats don’t Engage in Debate but Instead Lie and Launch Personal Attacks
The liberal viewpoint is a minority viewpoint. Only about 21% of the people identify themselves as liberal. While 35% identify themselves as moderate. And 40% identify themselves as conservative (see Conservatives Remain the Largest Ideological Group in U.S. on Gallup). So those wishing to implement a liberal agenda have their work cut out for them. Because about 75% of the people don’t think like they do. That is, not yet.
This is why the president wants to get 4 year olds into state-paid childcare. And why liberals want to take our children away so the state can raise them. So the liberals can get them while they’re young. And diminish the influence of their parents. Especially when those parents are conservatives. Who resist the liberal indoctrination of their children. And undo some of the hard work they’ve done in getting these children to think ‘correctly’. Which is a big problem for liberal Democrats. Because they can’t win on the merits of their policies. Not when 75% of the people don’t think like they do.
So liberal Democrats teach our kids to fear and hate those who don’t think like they do. And they mock, belittle, disparage, demean, deride, etc., these people who don’t think like they do. They don’t engage in debate. They lie. And launch personal attacks. Which our high school and college kids find so entertaining. They fill the audience at the Daily Show and the Late Show with David Lettermen. They may not understand the issues. But they know that they should laugh. And how they should vote. For they know that corporations are bad. Capitalism is bad. While unions are good. And government is good. The cool people they admire so much are liberal Democrats. So they, too, are liberal Democrats. And until they learn from age and experience to vote like adults they will continue to vote as self-indulgent children. Living to maximize the pleasure of the moment. No matter the long-term consequence of their actions.
Tags: capitalism, childcare, children, college, college professors, Communist, conservative, conservatives, corporations, Democrats, Global Warming, liberal, Liberal Agenda, Liberal Democrats, parents, professors, profit incentive, public schools, radicals, Republicans, teachers, think correctly, unfettered capitalism, unions, vote correctly
The Girls in the “In” Crowd focus on their Appearance and try to be the Kind of Girl the Boys in the “In” Crowd Want
After puberty the attractive people start noticing each other. Boys become jocks and get physically fit. Girls start dieting and develop eating disorders. The jocks tend to come from more well-to-do families because it’s expensive to participate in sports. So not only are the jocks physically attractive to the girls they also have the nicer stuff. The attractive girls try to date the good looking boys with the nicer stuff. And they do. When these attractive people get together they form the “In” crowd.
I’m in with the “In” crowd
I go where the “In” crowd goes
I’m in with the “In” crowd
And I know what the “In” crowd knows
The “In” crowd attends the best parties. They wear the finest clothes. They have the latest toys. Everyone wants to be part of the “In” crowd. But most only see it from the outside. For they aren’t attractive enough or rich enough to be in with the “In” crowd.
We breeze up and down the street
We get respect from the people we meet
They make way day or night
They know the “In” crowd is out of sight
The girls in the “In” crowd focus on their appearance. And try to be the kind of girl the boys in the “In” crowd want. The blonde stereotype. Young and dumb. And beautiful. If they please these rich boys they get jewelry, clothes, recreational drugs and great nights out at the best parties at the best clubs. And all they have to do is look beautiful. And put out. To hook up with these rich boys and give them what they want. Sex with beautiful girls. Which they readily give up thanks to birth control. And when that fails, abortion.
I’m in with the “In” crowd
I know ev’ry latest dance
When you’re in with the “In” crowd
It’s easy to find romance
Being in the “In” crowd is where it’s at. That small clique in school everyone wants to be a part of. The nerds and the geeks. The poor. The overweight. The short. Those with horrible acne. The losers. They all look at the beautiful people in the “In” crowd and dream of being asked to join them. But they never will. So life goes on for them. These losers. Some work on their grades and go on to college. Become doctors, chemists, engineers, etc. Others get a factory job. Learn a skilled trade. Go into journalism. Or politics.
Once in with the “In” Crowd you become Part of the Upper Class and Live like Royalty and are Treated like Royalty
The rich guys in the “In” crowd like their women young and dumb. In fact, a lot of the people in the “In” crowd make fun of the smart kids in school. Calling them chumps for learning stuff. Some of the “In” crowd go on to great success in sports, music, movies and television. Some go on to great success for nothing more than being part of the “In” crowd. Such as Paris Hilton. And Kim Kardashian. But a lot of girls who were in with the “In” crowd lose the affections of the boys they once had. As other young and pretty girls displace them. Even marry these rich guys. With nothing but their looks to go on some end up dancing in strip bars. And when their youth fades some enter prostitution. Or collect government benefits. Because instead of hitting the books when they were in high school they went to the best parties. And travelled with the “In” crowd.
Some of those who did hit the books in high school learned some things. Some useful things. Things that helped them get into college. But they primarily learned how to be Democrat voters. Because public education is controlled by the teacher unions. And their Democrat friends in government. When they go on to college their liberal college professors pull them even further left. They learn to not like or trust capitalism. And to love government unconditionally. When they get their degrees some go into journalism with a liberal bias. Some become elected politicians. Liberal Democrats. Where they have a lot of money pass through their hands. Which gives them a lot of power. And what does money and power give you? Access to the best parties. Where you can actually meet and rub shoulders with the stars of sports, music, movies and television. Yes, these losers from high school finally get to travel with the “In” crowd.
And once in they never want to leave. Because it is great being in with the “In” crowd. You become part of the upper class. You live like royalty. And are treated like royalty. Because of all that power you hold. So they want to protect their elevated status. By protecting their government jobs. And creating more government jobs. As many as possible. So there is always some place for them to go in case their ungrateful constituents vote them out of office. And these ungrateful constituents are a problem. Because they believe in limited government. Low taxes. Little government spending. Fewer regulations. The very things that are anathema to those who have entered the “In” crowd via big liberal government.
A Serious Crisis gets People Emotional and makes them willing to do things they weren’t willing to do Before
American kids are getting their behinds handed to them by Indian and Chinese kids. Who are blowing them away on test scores. Why? Because of the liberal control of public education. Instead of being introduced to differential calculus in high school American kids are learning multicultural things. Instead of learning about Adam Smith and laissez faire economics they’re learning about America’s original sin. Slavery. Even though the American economy took off in the free North. Which is why the North defeated the South in the American Civil War. But they teach our kids that we stole the land from the Native Americans and got rich by exploiting African slaves. Because of the evils of capitalism. And the profit incentive. Which steals from everybody. And exploits everyone. This is what they teach our kids. Instead of math and science.
Of course, dumbing down the curriculum has a very positive side affect. For liberals. The less these kids know the easier it is to lie to them. Making it easier to turn them into good Democrat voters. Who keep voting for liberal candidates. And their liberal policies. Which keeps expanding the size of government. And the amount of government spending. Which they pay for by increasing the taxes on those who can afford to pay more. And they add layer upon layer of new regulations on businesses. Enforced by a growing number of bureaucrats. Creating ever more jobs in the federal government. To help level the playing field. To help the little guy. And to punish those who have too much wealth. Because it is the fair thing to do. The just thing. Especially in a country with so many wrongs to right.
But eventually these kids grow up. Get jobs. And raise families. They become moderates. Even conservatives. Who tend to vote against the liberal agenda. Which is why the Left can’t rely on just dumbing down people. Because dumb can wear off. So they have to tug on people’s heartstrings. Get people’s emotions working for them. And nothing does that better than milking a crisis. For as Rahm Emanuel said, “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste.” Because a serious crisis gets people emotional. Makes them willing to do things they weren’t willing to do before. Like the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary. Twenty dead children really made people emotional. And the Left hopes emotional enough to get these people to support something that they normally wouldn’t support. Gun control. Which the Left is hell-bent on passing. Just as they were hell-bent on passing Obamacare. Despite the masses opposing it. Just as they oppose gun control. But they were able to tug enough at people’s heartstrings to pass Obamacare into law. Just as they hope to pass gun control into law. For when it comes to passing an unpopular liberal agenda nothing helps more than uninformed people and heightened emotions. And the more of that liberal agenda they pass the more the government grows. Creating more jobs in an expanding federal government. Giving these politicians more money. And more power. Getting them into the best parties. Where they meet and rub shoulders with the stars of sports, music, movies and television. Letting these one-time high school losers continue to be in with “In” crowd.
(The “In” Crowd by Billy Page performed by Bryan Ferry.)
Tags: "In" crowd, attractive people, bureaucrats, capitalism, crisis, Democrat voters, Democrats, dumbing down, emotional, emotions, Government jobs, gun control, heightened emotions, journalism, liberal, Liberal Agenda, Liberal Democrats, liberal policies, money, money and power, Obamacare, politicians, power, public education, rich guys, serious crisis, uninformed people
Week in Review
The mainstream media has a liberal bias. They support liberal Democrats and their policies. They report favorably on liberal Democrats. And attack the conservative opposition. Liberals have benefitted nicely from this partnership with the mainstream media. Virtually having their own propaganda ministry. And they use it to advance a liberal agenda. They have tried to pass legislation like the Fairness Doctrine to muzzle Rush Limbaugh in particular and talk radio in general. They belittle Fox News and say it is a Right wing shill for simply not having a liberal bias. They hate the Tea Party and blame them for any obstruction of liberal policies in Congress. Some on the Left have even called for the rounding up and imprisoning of these ‘enemies of the state’ who oppose their liberal agenda. Pining for the days before the Internet, cable television and talk radio when they had full control of the only three news networks. Which is another reason why liberals love China (see Chinese protest outside newspaper gates in rare censorship demo by NBC News staff and wire reports posted 1/7/2013 on Behind the Wall on NBC News).
Scores of supporters of one of China’s most liberal newspapers demonstrated outside its headquarters on Monday in a rare protest against censorship, backing an unusual strike by journalists against interference by the provincial propaganda chief…
Negotiations between journalists and officials, whom the protesters held responsible for replacing a New Year’s letter to readers that called for a constitutional government with another piece lauding the party’s achievements, continued into the night, a senior journalist who asked not to be named told NBC News…
The protesters, most of them young, laid down small handwritten signs that said “freedom of expression is not a crime” and “Chinese people want freedom…”
The non-profit watchdog group Reporters without Borders ranked China at 174th out of 179 spots in its 2011-2012 press freedom index. The United States ranked 47th in the annual report, six rungs above Hong Kong, a former British colony which is administered separately from China’s mainland.
“China, which has more journalists, bloggers and cyber-dissidents in prison than any other country, stepped up its censorship and propaganda in 2011 and tightened its control of the Internet, particularly the blogosphere,” the group said in a report about the rankings.
What is the difference between liberals and conservatives? In this case liberals would have sympathies for the Chinese Communist Party. For they admire the Chinese way. Just as they admired the Soviet way. Where smart state planners ran the economy. And prevented any private business owners from getting rich. And these smart state planners even ran their personal lives. Doing things that were for their best interests. Because they were smarter than the people and knew what was best. Even if the people disagreed.
Conservatives, meanwhile, would have sympathies for the Chinese people. For they are simpatico with them. Facing the same assault on their liberties from an ‘enlightened’ ruling class. Albeit to a lesser degree than these Chinese lovers of liberty. So far.
Tags: American Left, conservative, Liberal Agenda, liberal bias, Liberal Democrats, liberals love China, mainstream media, propaganda, state planners
The Single Goal of Liberalism is to Transfer as much Wealth and Power from the Private Sector
The Founding Fathers were liberals. They believed in individual liberty. Personal responsibility. The Rule of Law. And limited government. Very limited government. Very, very limited government. Not something you associate with liberals today. Which is why we must call the Founding Fathers classical liberals. Because liberalism today isn’t our Founding Fathers’ liberalism. In fact, it’s what they rebelled against. Privilege.
Liberals today are a small sliver of the population. About 20%. And they’ve been around forever. They’ve just had different names. The nobility. The aristocracy. The planter elite. Those born of privilege. And who live off of the wealth created by others. Through inheritance. Through land ownership. Or via taxation. This privileged class does not work. No. They get others to create wealth for them. And their tool is class warfare.
Their single goal is to make government as large as possible. For the larger it is the more wealth and power they can transfer from the private sector. And there is nothing more effective for growing government than pitting one group of people against another. Rich against poor. Employees against employers. Labor against capital. Consumers against corporations. And, of course, racism, sexism, ageism, whateverism. Whoever you are they’ll find someone who has discriminated against you. And they’ll use that to their advantage. To legislate a new law in Congress. Or from the bench in the judiciary.
Liberals get us Accustomed to Living on the ‘Kindness’ of Government and Terrified of Losing the Government Way of Life
Liberals don’t see individuals. They see the group the individual belongs to. And how they can use one group to agitate another. To advance their agenda. To increase taxation. And regulation. To grow government. To extend their power and influence over the private sector. So secure their position of privilege.
They once called themselves the ruling elite. And ruled accordingly. Until the inconvenience of elections. Representative government. And a Constitution that limits their power. Now they have to be stealthier. And hide who they are. What they truly believe. And use the courts to make law that they can’t legislate in Congress. How do they do this? By dumbing down our public education. Changing the meaning of words. And by fooling us. By hiding in a ‘benevolent’ Big Government. A government that protects the poor. The disadvantaged. The little guy. When in fact they use the poor, the disadvantaged and the little guy to secure their position of privilege. For if they actually helped these people their work would be done. And that’s the last thing they want. To lose their expanding powers to regulate and tax.
So they extend their power and control over us. While telling us it’s for our own good. And make as many of us dependent on them as possible. By providing generous welfare programs. Social Security. Medicare. And now Obamacare. Getting us accustomed to living on the ‘kindness’ of government. And making us terrified of losing our government way of life.
Liberals Consume Tax Dollars and Benefit from a Growing Government that Increases Taxes and Regulations
Liberals consume tax dollars. They don’t pay tax dollars. The private sector taxpayers pay the salary and benefits of all politicians. Public sector employees. Public school teachers. And college professors. Via ever escalating tuition prices that no liberal ever objects to. (Unlike rising prices in the private sector.) Either paid for by rich parents. Or student loans. Once backed by the government. Now issued by the government.
Liberals enjoy generous pay and benefit packages courtesy of the taxpayer. In return liberals in education advance the liberal agenda. (Ask a kid to explain global warming and capitalism and guess which one he or she will be able to explain). Liberals in unions repay that government kindness (such as favorable legislation that restricts competition) through generous contributions from their union dues. And agitate, organize and vote for the liberal agenda. To keep the spigot of that government kindness open.
And then you have the guilty-rich. People who try to assuage their guilt of inheriting their wealth. Those who made it rich in the movies. In music. In sports. As an author. Anyone who got obscenely wealthy. But doesn’t want to be attacked for being obscenely wealthy. Like those on Wall Street. And those corporate CEOs. So they, too, advance the liberal agenda. While sheltering their wealth from the greedy hands of government.
Then there’re the pseudo-intellectuals. Those who advance the liberal agenda to sound smart. Or to be included in the inner circle of the elite. Those in the mainstream media. And celebrities. Who cry out desperately for affirmation. That they are more than just someone pretending to be someone else. Or simply someone reporting on the exciting lives of others.
Finally the young. The uneducated. Or poorly educated. Who don’t understand capitalism, economics, history or public policy. And they don’t care. As long as they get something. Government benefits. Or fun. Whether it be sex and drugs. Or the thrill of protesting. Anything to escape living in the real world. Those who just don’t want to grow up. And become responsible adults. Like their parents. Until they start raising a family. Then they are exactly like their parents. So the liberals have to get them while they’re young. And keep them woefully ignorant about the real world for as long as possible.
The Liberal Social and Political Philosophy has the Simple Goal of Securing their Position of Privilege
The liberal social and political philosophy is simple. Everything they believe, everything they do, has but one goal. Securing their position of privilege. Which explains a record of contradiction and failure. Such as ‘working hard’ to create jobs while the economy wallows in recession due to an unfriendly job-creating environment. Because of their high taxes. Costly regulations. And the great uncertainty of what will come next.
But when you understand their goal it makes perfect sense. High taxes and regulation extends their control over the private sector. And recession sets the stage for Keynesian stimulus spending. Which creates more government programs. Paid for by higher taxes. Which is more wealth transferred from the private sector. Further extending their control over the private sector.
Liberal policy, then, makes perfect sense. When you understand its goal is to expand their control over the private sector. To secure their position of privilege. Because when you do you’ll see that this policy has never been contradictory. And it has never failed.
Tags: benefits, Big Government, capitalism, class warfare, college, college professors, disadvantaged, Founding Fathers, government benefits, government kindness, government way of life, grow government, growing government, guilty rich, kindness of government, liberal, Liberal Agenda, liberalism, liberals, liberals consume tax dollars, limited government, little guy, philosophy, political philosophy, poor, position of privilege, private sector, privilege, privileged class, public education, public school, public school teachers, regulation, ruling elite, secure their position of privilege, social and political philosophy, tax dollars, taxation, taxpayer, union, wealth, wealth and power
« Previous Entries