The Constitution prevented the Executive from Ruling Arbitrarily and becoming Judge, Jury and Executioner
There have been funding gaps. And there have been government shutdowns. But not always both. For once upon a time the executive branch stayed open for business even when the House of Representatives did not approve their bills for payment. But that all changed in 1980 thanks to Jimmy Carter’s attorney general. Benjamin Civiletti.
Civiletti wrote two opinions as attorney general changing the way government spends money. The first said the executive can’t spend any money without the House of Representatives’ approval. A strict interpretation of the U.S. Constitution. His second opinion softened the first. Giving the executive power to spend money the House of Representatives doesn’t approve of when necessary to protect life and property. Such as funding the military. And so grew the delineation between essential and nonessential spending. Or what some would say essential spending and pork.
The Founding Fathers saw the damage absolute monarchies could do. Even a constitutional monarchy with too much power. So they separated powers. They created three branches of government. The executive, the legislative and the judiciary. One branch to write the law (the legislature). One branch to enforce the law (the executive). And one branch to interpret questions in the law (the judiciary). Thus preventing the executive from ruling arbitrarily and becoming judge, jury and executioner. Like a king.
The Founding Fathers gave the Power of the Purse to the House to rein in Executive Spending
The Founding Fathers took the separation of powers further. The House of Representatives was the people’s house. Where the people voted in their representatives by popular vote. But to keep a check on federal power the Senate was the states’ house (since changed by constitutional amendment, thus greatly increasing the power of the federal government over the states). Each state in the union had an equal voice. Thus requiring not only a majority of the people it also required a majority of the states to pass federal law. To keep the larger urban populations from dictating policy to the lesser populated rural areas.
The Founding Fathers took the separation of powers even further. Giving the power of the purse to the House of Representatives. So the executive couldn’t wage costly wars. Or expand bloated bureaucracies to reward campaign donors with patronage. Or expand a welfare state to buy votes. Especially since Alexander Hamilton opened Pandora’s Box with his interpretation of the necessary and proper clause. Which expanded the scope of the federal government to include whatever it thought was necessary and proper. Giving rise to the progressive/liberal state. Something that would have horrified Alexander Hamilton if he were alive today to see the behemoth the federal government became. And had he known then what would become of the federal government today he would have been a Jeffersonian. Jefferson and Hamilton would probably still have hated each other but they would have agreed on keeping limited government limited.
Civiletti understood that the Founding Fathers meant to rein in the spending powers of the executive branch. To meet the intent of the separation of powers they felt was essential for representative government. A government of the people, by the people and for the people. As Abraham Lincoln so eloquently said in the Gettysburg Address some 76 years later. Hence his first opinion. Which he softened with his second when it hurt his boss and the Democrat cause. For Civiletti was a Democrat.
The Democrats want to Break the Republican Opposition and Govern Against the Intent of the Founding Fathers
Before Civiletti’s opinions there was little urgency to settle funding gaps between what the executive branch wanted and what the House would approve. So at the end of a fiscal year the executive often continued to operate without spending authority. Letting the durations of these funding gaps last for a week or more. With no interruption of government services. But after Civiletti’s opinions the government shut down nonessential services. Which did speed up the closing of the funding gap. For when the funding gap included a government shutdown resolving the funding gap went from a week or more to a few days.
To date there have been 18 funding gaps that went unresolved into the new fiscal year. One of which is still ongoing. In the table you can see how much quicker the House and the executive branch resolved their differences with the threat of a government shutdown. The exception to that being the longest shutdown during the Clinton administration. Which ultimately led the way to welfare reform. Which greatly dampened President Clinton’s costly liberal agenda. And was the law of the land until President Obama used sweeping powers he does not have to roll back some of that legislation.
President Obama and the Democrats have called the House Republicans about every derogatory name in the book for dare trying to enforce the Founding Fathers’ separation of powers. Saying that never before has a radical fringe held a gun to the head of the executive, took hostages, demanded ransom, etc. But that’s not true. Of the 18 funding gaps where the House of Representatives did not give the president all the money he wanted that president was a Republican 55.6% of the time. So Republican presidents got their way fewer times than Democrat presidents. And as far as hostage takers, the Democrats held the power of the purse 15 of those 18 funding gaps/shutdowns. Or 83.3%. So the president and the Democrats aren’t telling the truth when it comes to the historical record. Who seem to be more interested in swinging public opinion to their side. So they can break the Republican opposition. And govern against the intent of the Founding Fathers.
Tags: Alexander Hamilton, Benjamin Civiletti, Civiletti, Constitution, Democrat, essential spending, executive, executive branch, federal government, Founding Fathers, funding gap, government shutdown, House of Representatives, judiciary, legislative, limited government, necessary and proper, nonessential spending, power of the purse, representative government, Republican, separation of powers, shutdown, the House, U.S. Constitution
The Way to Great Wealth in the South was King Cotton
At the recent 50th anniversary of Dr. Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream” speech most if not all of the speakers were liberal Democrats. As if the Republicans were not welcomed there. Funny. As it was the Republicans who battled the Democrats to end slavery, Jim Crowe Laws and discrimination.
America’s original sin, slavery, was a part of the Old World southern planters did not want to give up. It was very similar to the manorial system of Europe. Where peasants were tied to the land. On a manor. Unable to leave. Land that a rich landowner owned. The lord of the manor. Property and status were hereditary. And the peasants at the bottom of the ladder had neither.
The lords belonged to the aristocracy. The nobility. They lived in glorious mansions. Gave magnificent parties. And enjoyed the best of everything. Courtesy of owning land. The peasants worked the land. And produced the greatest wealth in the kingdom for their lord. Food. In the American South this soon became cotton. King Cotton. The way to great wealth in the South was growing cotton. And the more slaves you had the more noble your life was.
The Founding Fathers wanted to Eradicate Slavery at the Time of the Founding
Things were different in the North. Years of growing tobacco had depleted the land. So they diversified. Grew different crops. And rotated the crops around. This required a more specialized workforce as things changed from year to year. And few farms grew one large cash crop anymore. So they turned to paid-labor. Which was more efficient. So while the South held on to the Old World the North became more egalitarian.
The Founding Fathers knew that a nation based on all men being equal could not include the institution of slavery. They wanted to eradicate it at the time of the drafting of the Constitution. But that created a problem with the South. At the time of the Founding their economy was dependent on slavery. And because it was they had more slaves than the North. So freeing the slaves would not only destroy their economy it would force the South to live in a biracial society that was unheard of at that time. Nowhere in the world were there biracial societies. Not to mention the fact that the freed blacks would outnumber the whites. The very same whites that once brutally oppressed the blacks.
To form a more perfect union they needed the southern states. Which they had to take as-is. With the institution of slavery. It was a bitter pill to swallow. As some of these Founding Fathers, especially the ones that didn’t own slaves, were conscious of the history books that would one day be written. As well as being truly opposed to slavery. But the choice was a new nation with slavery. Or no new nation. And continued sectional disputes. Even hostilities. Making them ripe for European intrigue. Especially from the Old World Empires who wanted to expand their empires into North America.
The Republicans Freed the Slaves, Fought against Jim Crowe Laws and Desegregated the South
So the Founding Fathers tabled the subject of slavery for 20 years. Sure that in 20 years time the South would adopt paid labor as they did in the North. Sadly, a great invention changed all that. The cotton gin. Which could process cotton faster than slaves could pick it. King Cotton promised more wealth than ever before. All you needed was a lot of slaves. Dashing the hopes of the Founding Fathers.
Wealth. Nobility. Life was good for the privileged few in the South. The planter elite. The southern Democrats. Who used the power of the federal government to return fugitive slaves. Then bitched about the federal government after they lost control of it. The planter elite brought the nation to civil war. To preserve the institution of slavery. To keep the Old World in the South. To keep the nobility in the South. With them sitting at the top of the aristocracy. But then came the Republicans. And Abraham Lincoln. Who issued the Emancipation Proclamation. Freeing the slaves in the states in open rebellion. Then Ulysses S. Grant won the American Civil War. The Republicans pushed for and ratified the Thirteenth Amendment. Abolishing slavery and involuntary servitude. Then Republican President Grant sent federal troops into the South to protect the freed blacks. As the racist southern Democrats resisted integrating the freed blacks into the South. Eventually passing Jim Crowe Laws. Making the freed blacks a permanent underclass with the Democrats’ separate but equal status of the freed blacks.
Democrat Storm Thurmond has the record for the longest filibuster in U.S. history. He talked for 24 hours and 18 minutes in his opposition of the Civil Rights Act of 1957. For he wanted to keep blacks separate but equal. The southern Democrats opposition to civil rights was so strong that it prevailed through JFK’s administration. Who did nothing for civil rights lest he go against the powerful southern Democrats. Despite all the Republicans did the Democrats kept the black man down in the South. Dr. King fought against segregation in Albany, Georgia, in 1962. And suffered brutal police oppression in Birmingham, Alabama, that same year. Things were so bad during JFK’s administration that Dr. King helped organized the 1963 March on Washington. Where he gave his famous “I Have a Dream” speech. But real change would have to wait until Republican Richard Nixon became president. Who implemented the first large-scale desegregation of public schools in the Democrat-controlled South. And Nixon implemented the first affirmative action plan. The Philadelphia plan.
Yet despite all of this the Democrats claim the title of champion of civil rights. And dominated the 50th anniversary of Dr. Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream” speech. Even though it was the Republicans who freed the slaves, fought against Jim Crowe Laws and desegregated the South. While the Democrats fought them every step of the way. Yet the Democrats are civil rights champions. While Republicans are racists. What’s wrong with this picture?
Tags: aristocracy, civil rights, cotton, Democrats, discrimination, Dr. King, Dr. Martin Luther King, Founding Fathers, Grant, I Have a Dream, JFK, Jim Crowe laws, King Cotton, Martin Luther King's, Nixon, nobility, Old World, paid-labor, planter elite, Republicans, separate but equal, slavery, South, Southern Democrats
Everything grown on the West Side of the Appalachian Mountains eventually ended up on the Mississippi River
At the time of the Founding the American population was clustered around the East Coast. And on major rivers that flowed into the Atlantic Ocean. On land east of the Appalachian Mountains. Not by choice. But because of geography. The Founding Fathers knew what great land lay west. But getting there was another story.
The Great Lakes are huge. The largest group of freshwater lakes in the world. If you walked all the coastlines you’d walk so long and so far that you could have walked halfway around the world. Getting on the lakes opened up the Northwest Territory. Western New York. Western Pennsylvania. Ohio. Michigan. Indiana. Illinois. Wisconsin. Minnesota. And with some portaging, the great interior rivers. Including the Mississippi River. Opening up the Great Plains to the West. And the rich fertile farmland of the interior. But there was one great obstacle between all of this and the east coast. Niagara Falls. Which portaging around was a bitch.
The United States would become an agricultural superpower. But until they had a way to transport food grown on the land west of the Appalachians that land was not as valuable as it could be. There were some land routes. George Washington crossed many times into the Ohio Country from Virginia. And Daniel Boone blazed the Wilderness Road through the Cumberland Gap into Kentucky and Tennessee. Opening the Northwest Territory to settlement. All the way up to the Mississippi River. And its tributaries. Including the Ohio River. But none of these water routes offered a way back east. Which is why everything grown on the west side of the Appalachian Mountains eventually ended up on the Mississippi River. And traveled south. To the Port of New Orleans. But there was one major problem with that. The Port of New Orleans belonged to the Spanish.
Thomas Jefferson fought Tirelessly against the Constitution to Restrict the Powers of the Executive Branch
At the time of the Founding there were four European nations jockeying for a piece of the New World. Who all wanted to keep the Americans east of the Appalachians. The French had lost New France to the British. Which they hoped to get back. And the farther the Americans moved west the harder that would be. The British were in Canada. With outposts still in the Northwest Territory. Despite ceding that land to the Americans. While the British were pressing in from the north the Spanish were pressing in from the south and the west. Coming up from Mexico they were in New Orleans. Texas. The trans-Mississippi region (the land west of the Mississippi River. And California and the West Coast. Making navigation rights on the Mississippi River and the Port of New Orleans a hotly contested issue.
Time would solve that problem in America’s favor. Napoleon would get the Louisiana Territory for France from the Spanish. And was intent on rebuilding New France in the New World. But with the slave rebellion in Saint-Domingue—present day Haiti—Napoleon’s plans changed. Instead of building New France he was focusing on saving Old France. As the world war he launched wasn’t going all that well. So he sold the Louisiana Territory to Thomas Jefferson, then president of the United States. Making the navigation rights of the Mississippi River a moot point. For it now belonged to the United States. Which was great for Thomas Jefferson. For, he, too, looked west. And believed the young nation’s future was on the west side of the Appalachian Mountains. Where yeoman farmers would work their land. Forming the backbone of the new republic. Honest men doing honest labor. Not merchants, bankers and stockjobbers that were trying to destroy the new nation in the east. The detestable moneyed men that Jefferson hated so. No. The winds of the Revolutionary spirit blew west.
This is why Jefferson jumped on the Louisiana Purchase. In direct violation of the Constitution. A document he hated because it gave way too much power to the president. Making the president little different from a king. Which was the whole point of the American Revolution. To do away with king-like power. Throughout his active political life he fought tirelessly against the Constitution. Fighting to restrict the powers of the executive branch wherever he could. But the Louisiana Territory? President Jefferson suddenly had an epiphany. It was good to be king.
The Erie Canal connected the Eastern Seaboard with the Great Lakes without any Portages
Jefferson would resort to his anti-government positions following the Louisiana Purchase. He may have violated everything he stood for but even the most stalwart limited government proponent no doubt approves of Jefferson’s actions. Jefferson was happy. As was everyone west of the Appalachians. But it didn’t solve one problem. The Great Lakes region upstream of Niagara Falls was still cutoff from the East Coast. And the Port of New Orleans. There were some routes to these destinations. But they included some portaging between navigable waterways. Which made it difficult to transport bulk goods into the region. And out of the region.
As Jefferson’s vision of limited government faded government grew. As did government spending. Especially on internal improvements. For they had great political dividends. They created a lot of jobs. And brought a lot of federal money to communities with those internal improvements. Which helped politicians win elections. And back around the 1800s the big internal improvements were canals. Such as the Erie Canal. Connecting the Eastern Seaboard with the Great Lakes. Providing a waterway without any portages from the Hudson River that flows into the Atlantic Ocean at New York City. All the way to the Great Lakes. Near Buffalo. Just above Niagara Falls. Opening the Great Lakes regions to settlement. And the Northwest Territory. (Something George Washington wanted to do. Who wanted to extend a canal into the West from the Potomac River.) Creating a trade super highway between the Great Lakes region and the East Coast. Through the Port of New York. And on to the rest of the world.
The U.S. population moved west. But still clung to rivers and coastlines. Until another internal improvement came along. The railroad. Which did for the country’s interior what the Erie Canal did for the Great Lakes region. With cities growing up along these rail lines. Away from rivers and coastlines. Then came the interstate highway system. Which allowed cities to grow away from the rail lines. There is now a road, rail or waterway that will take you pretty much anywhere in the United States. And now we have the airplane. Which can fly over the Appalachians. Or the Niagara escarpment. Allowing us today to move anyone or anything anywhere today. Something George Washington and Thomas Jefferson desperately wanted. But could only dream of.
Tags: Appalachian, Appalachian Mountains, canals, East Coast, Erie Canal, Founding Fathers, George Washington, Great Lakes, interior, internal improvements, Louisiana Purchase, Louisiana Territory, Mississippi River, Napoleon, New France, New Orleans, Niagara Falls, Northwest Territory, Ohio River, port of New Orleans, portage, Thomas Jefferson
While the French embrace their Culture the Liberals in America attack their own Culture
What is multiculturalism? It’s a philosophy of diversity. Basically saying it’s our differences that make us great. Something you won’t hear a whole lot of in France. Where they have a single culture they promote. The French culture. And rightly so. Because it is the French culture that makes France great. Just as it is the British culture that makes Britain great. As the Spanish culture makes Spain great. As the German culture makes Germany great. As the Japanese culture makes Japan great. As the Mexican culture makes Mexico great. Etc.
In the United States of America, though, it’s not American culture that makes America great. It’s all of the other cultures in America. Which is why they teach multiculturalism. Where we must admire and respect every other culture. And they don’t teach assimilation. Where people in America assimilate into a single culture. The American culture. The one culture that is not worthy of admiration or veneration. Apparently.
Where did this start? It started with our educators at colleges and universities. As well as at our public schools. And the liberals controlling them. Who decided to do something about their hatred of America. In addition to the other things that they were already doing. Instead of teaching about American greatness they taught about American imperialism. They taught how the Founding Fathers stole America from the Native Americans. They taught how the Founding Fathers were nothing more than rich white slave owners. Who made a country to benefit rich white slave owners. So while the French embrace their culture the liberals in America attack their own culture. Basically saying America isn’t great. But everyone else is. That is multiculturalism.
Liberals are Smarter than Everyone Else and should be Running the Nation, not a Government of the People
Liberals hate America. They hate it so much that they have worked incessantly to change it. Like a cancer. Working from within. Invading our culture and institutions and slowly spreading. Just as socialism consumed Europe. The liberals wanted that in America, too. But liberals were, and still are, a small minority in the nation. Few think like they do. So they’ve always found great resistance to their enlightened ideals.
Their Ivy League schools created and nurtured liberalism. Rich people who inherited their money sent their kids to the Ivy League. And when they leave these schools many go into politics. Or policy think-tanks that influence politics. So these few, this privileged few, can change America. To reflect what they believe it should be. And run by like-minded people like them. An aristocracy. Something America shouldn’t have. But does because of people like them. Who are better and smarter than everyone else. And should be running the nation. Not a government of the people.
Liberals hate the principles of the Founding Fathers. They hate limited government. Laissez-faire capitalism. Free markets. A business-friendly regulatory environment. Low taxes. And the profit incentive. The things that made America the number one economy in the world. And the destination of choice for immigrants looking for a better life. One free from government oppression. Abject poverty. Chronic hunger. And corruption. People who were tired of living in a society where everyone was equal. Where some were more equal than others. So they came here. To get away from people like liberals. Who think they are more equal than everyone else.
Liberals enshrine Single Mothers and Same-Sex Couples raising Children to help destroy the Traditional Family
Because liberals are a small minority of the population they face great opposition. Which is why they have infiltrated our educational system. To set the educational curriculum. So they can take our children. And make them think differently from their parents. Who most likely think like the majority. And not like the liberal, privileged elite. The aristocracy. This is the greatest enemy of liberalism. Parents. And the family.
Parents have some 5 years to teach their kids to think incorrectly. That’s a 5-year head-start these parents have. Which the liberals have to undo. So they can start programming them to become good liberals. So they attack the family. To break the bond between the parents and their children. So they can start building a bond between these children and the liberal state. Which is a prime motivation behind global warming. For it was these children’s greedy, thoughtless parents that caused global warming. Because they were so greedy and thoughtless—or just too stupid—to care about the planet.
So liberals enshrine single mothers. And same-sex couples raising children. To help destroy the traditional family. And build a loyalty of single mothers and same-sex couples to the state. By providing financial assistance. Or new legislation to protect and help them. Ensuring that these people will make these children think correctly from the get-go. Which is why multiculturalism and diversity go out the window in the family. A mother and a father are different. They are a woman and a man. Who can provide a much broader cultural education than a single mother. Or a same-sex couple. Who can only provide half of the cultural experience that a woman AND a man can provide. So parenting is the one place in America that we don’t make better with diversity. For when it comes to children in the household there is nothing wrong with having a single cultural experience. No. Multiculturalism only applies after these kids leave the household. When they may start thinking incorrectly.
Tags: American culture, aristocracy, children, diversity, educational system, family, father, Founding Fathers, French culture, Global Warming, Ivy League, liberalism, liberals, mother, multiculturalism, parents, privileged few, same-sex couples, single mothers, traditional family
The British Subjects were bothered by their Protestant King having a French Catholic Wife
King Henry VIII had a falling out with the Pope. And broke away from the Catholic Church. Putting England on the path to becoming Protestant. Now, for those of you unfamiliar with the Protestant Reformation the resulting conflicts between Catholics and Protestants were really horrible. And bloody. Some of England’s greatest enemies during that time were Spain and France. Both Catholic. But this Catholic-Protestant animosity was not limited to her foreign enemies.
Religion played a large part in the English Civil War (1642–1651). In fact, it started it. When King Charles I tried to impose an English prayer book on Presbyterian Scotland. To have a singular religion in England and Scotland. Which the Scottish didn’t embrace. And pushed back on King Charles. Who then wanted to teach the Scottish a lesson. With an army. But to raise an army he needed money. Which meant he had to call Parliament. And when he did they weren’t all that keen on spending money for another war. Then one thing led to another. Resulting in a war between supporters of the king. Cavaliers. And supporters of Parliament. Roundheads.
But there was another religious element. The king’s wife. Henrietta Maria. Of France. Who was a proud practicing Catholic. This bothered a lot of people. The king having a French Catholic wife in a Protestant country where they were still executing Catholics. For practicing religion wrong. And now the king had a Catholic wife. Who they believed was turning the Protestant king Catholic. In fact, they thought that English churches even looked too Catholic for their liking. And they did something about it. They smashed idols. Altars. Vestments. Stained glass. Etc. Anything that you might find in a Catholic Church they destroyed. Believing their churches should be properly Protestant. Plain, boring and dull.
When Hostilities broke out the Anti-Catholic Sentiments among these British Americans were as Strong as Ever
About a hundred years later we come to the American Revolutionary War. Another war between the British people. Great Britain. And the American colonists. Who had grown into their own people. And did not like the mother country treating them as second class citizens in the British Empire. They didn’t like the taxation without representation. Or their mercantile economic policies. Which limited the colonists to raw material suppliers. That they had to sell to Britain. Ship on British ships. Then buy only British goods. Shipped on those same British ships. Goods often manufactured from their own raw materials.
When George Washington settled his accounts with his British agent he didn’t like what he saw. The British mercantile house was profiting more from his labors than he was. And it pissed him off. For George Washington was an astute businessman. One of the few planters that actually made a profit in Virginia. And the current system with Great Britain was just bad business. So when talk of independence came around he was quick to sign on. Both for principle. And for business. For he was an old man. Who knew a lot. And experienced even more. One of the privileges of being an old man.
When hostilities broke out the anti-Catholic sentiments among these British Americans were as strong as ever. And when General Washington’s soldiers expressed those sentiments publically the general quickly put an end to it. For the memories of the English Civil War were not that distant. He did not need to make his task more difficult by adding in that Catholic-Protestant animosity to the current struggle. Especially when there was an attempt to get Canada to join their cause. Which was recently French Canada. A colony of Catholic France. Before the British defeated the French in the Seven Years’ War. Making French Canada British. So the Americans were counting on cashing in on Canada’s anti-British sentiments. And hopefully France’s anti-British sentiments.
Americans were able to Win the Peace because they didn’t Need Government to tell them how to Live
The Canadians didn’t join the Americans. But the French did. And General Washington avoided defeat for 8 years. And won the American Revolutionary War. Against the mightiest empire in the world. A remarkable feat. Then Washington won the peace. Which was even more remarkable. For revolutions rarely end in peace. Because these conflicts are typically civil wars. Where brother fights brother. And when brother fights brother the fighting gets especially brutal. With bitter feelings of animosity. Like those between Catholics and Protestants. Which they often just can’t shut off after the fighting is over. But the Americans could. And did. Which is why their democracy worked. When so many others have failed.
America’s experiment in self-government worked because of men like George Washington. Responsible citizens who tempered their wants with knowledge and experience. Who saw the bigger picture. Who knew when to stand on principle. When to compromise. And when to leave things the hell alone. Not acting on passions. Or emotions. Not acting like children. But adults. Who knew they couldn’t have everything they wanted. And went without a lot of the things they really wanted. For with liberty came personal responsibility. You were free to do pretty much whatever you wanted to do. But that personal responsibility kept you from doing a lot of the things you shouldn’t do. By exercising restraint. Which our Founding Fathers exercised after winning the Revolutionary War. There were no reprisals. No vengeance. Only law. Where justice was blind. Something that didn’t happen during the French Revolution. Fought but 5 years from the close of the American Revolution. But unlike the American Revolution the streets of France ran with blood. Where vengeance ruled the day. And justice wasn’t blind.
This is what makes the American Revolution different. It was the character of the men fighting it. Men of the Enlightenment. Selfless men. Who put the country first. Instead of settling old scores. Helped in part by a short history in the New World. And a long history in the Old World. As they were able to learn the lessons of history. Without having centuries of wrongs to right inflaming their passions. Exceptional men. And exceptional circumstances. Something the French just didn’t have. Which is why the streets of France ran with blood. And why there were many fits and starts to their republic. While the Americans were able to make theirs work from the beginning. Because of the character of its people. Who were not used to a ruling power subjecting them. Who expected no one to take care of them. And just wanted their government to leave them the hell alone. So they could work hard. And provide for their families. And their ideal form of government was one that let them do just that. Not one that was a big part of their life. Or one that provided for them. Made them dependent on it. The Americans were able to win the peace because they didn’t need government to tell them how to live. They chose to live harmoniously together. Thanks to a character honed by their religious beliefs. And having exemplary men to emulate. The Founding Fathers. This is why the Americans were able to win the peace. Why the French were unable to win theirs. And why the Egyptians are struggling to win theirs.
Tags: American Revolution, anti-British sentiments, anti-Catholic sentiments, British Empire, Canada, Catholic, Catholic-Protestant animosity, character, democracy, England, Founding Fathers, France, French Revolution, George Washington, Great Britain, king, King Charles, liberty, Parliament, Protestant, Religion, responsibility, Revolutionary War, Scotland, Washington, win the peace
The Institution of Slavery was Dying Out in the U.S. before Eli Whitney and his Cotton Gin
Discrimination is wrong. And it doesn’t belong in a meritocracy. Which is what the United States is. Here it doesn’t matter who your father is. There is no nobility. No aristocracy. Here everyone is equal. It’s why people came here with pennies in their pocket. So they could work hard and live the American dream. Having the liberty to do whatever they wanted to do. Which many did. Starting out sweeping floors for a boss. And going on to be boss in their own business.
The Founding Fathers weren’t perfect. But they were as close to perfect as you can get. Selfless. Disinterested. Principled. And, yes, some were slave owners. But they didn’t invent slavery. Or bring it to the New World. It was part of the times they lived in. And already well entrenched in the colonies before they entered into the history books. The southern economy was already dependent on slave-labor during the writing of the Declaration of Independence. And the U.S. Constitution. Some of the Founding Fathers wanted to get rid of the institution. But to form a new nation they needed the southern states. And they wouldn’t join without their slaves. So they tabled the subject for 20 years. Trusting that it would resolve itself by then. But then Eli Whitney gave us the cotton gin. And, well, the rest is history.
The institution of slavery was slowly dying out before the cotton gin. George Washington wanted to replace his slaves with paid-laborers. For he wanted to change up his crops. Grow many different crops instead of one large cash crop. Something paid-labor was ideally suited for. As he could hire people with a particular crops’ skill-set and they could hit the ground running. But when you had slaves working the same large cash crop year after year such as tobacco change didn’t come easy. For you had to retrain your slaves. And with training there is a learning curve. It was just so much easier to hire well-skilled paid-laborers. And the fact that they wanted to work for you helped, too. For when forcing people to work for you against their will all you’ll get from them is the bare minimum that lets them escape brutal punishment. Which does not bring out a person’s latent talents. It just prevents these talents from ever seeing the light of day. No. Slave-labor as an economic model was a horrible one. As well as being immoral.
Abraham Lincoln and the new Republican Party ended Slavery in the United States
Slavery in the United States was concentrated in the South. On the plantations. Where they had a single, large cash crop. And thanks to Eli Whitney that crop was cotton. Because the cotton gin could so quickly comb the cotton fiber to remove the seeds and stems the sky was the limit. The only thing holding back your profits was the amount of land you put in production. And the only limit on that was the number of slaves you had to make land productive. Which is why the institution of slavery didn’t die out in 20 years time. Which really wasn’t overly optimistic. Because in the grand scheme of things there weren’t that many slaves in the United States to begin with.
Of all the slaves brought to the New World only about 6.5% ended up in British North America (according to Wikipedia). Another 18% went to other British colonies. Another 18% went to Spanish colonies. About 14% went to French colonies. While the vast majority of those slaves went to Portuguese colonies in the Americas. Approximately 39% of all African slaves. Most landing in Brazil. Which is why the Portuguese language is one of the top ten most spoken languages in the world today. Because Brazil is a very large country. Thanks to all of those slaves the Portuguese brought there.
Slavery was wrong. And it is America’s original sin. But it wasn’t what made America great. Or rich. Contrary to what our public schools are teaching our kids. If it was the South would have won the American Civil War. But they didn’t. The industrial North did. With her factories filled with paid-laborers. This was the New World. The South that lost the Civil War was the last remnants of the Old World in the New World. Where it mattered who your father was. Abraham Lincoln and the new Republican Party ended slavery in the United States. And the Republican Party would eventually put an end to Jim Crowe laws in the south. And passed the Civil Rights act (a larger percentage of Republicans voted for it than Democrats).
The Racial Divide has never been Greater despite electing a Black President Twice
So the Republicans have done more to end discrimination in the United States than the Democrats have. Who have actually spent more time opposing civil rights. But you wouldn’t know that. Not with all the disinformation the left puts out. Today the left claims they are the party that fights discrimination. When in actuality they instigate and exacerbate discrimination. Because it gives them power. For trying to end discriminations is very lucrative. Some have made careers and have grown quite wealthy trying to end discrimination. You know who they are so there’s no point in naming them here. But these people never end discrimination. For while there’s money in fighting discrimination there’s no money in ending it.
If there are always examples of discrimination in our society then there is always a need for those who fight it. There’s always a reason for new legislation. To right past wrongs. And make things fair. So the Democrats increased the size of the welfare state. To make the discriminated dependent on the state. To keep them on the plantation. Concentrating them in housing projects. In the inner city. Away from the Democrats’ nice neighborhoods. They broke up their families with AFDC. Replacing fathers with the state. Who failed these kids miserably. They implemented affirmative action. Where some game the system and get a free pass. Because of lower standards. Getting entrance to a college or a job over someone more qualified. Fomenting new racial unrest. As some complain about being passed over despite being more qualified. Which the left jumps on as proof of overt racism. And the need for them to do something more to end it.
But they never end anything. Because ending it would take away their power. Which is why despite everything they’ve done since the Sixties things have never been worse. And more policies and legislation to end discrimination have never been needed more. Because the racial divide has never been greater. Despite this country electing a black president. Twice.
Tags: Abraham Lincoln, black president, Brazil, civil rights, Civil War, cotton, cotton gin, Democrats, discrimination, Eli Whitney, Founding Fathers, institution of slavery, New World, Old World, paid laborers, paid-labor, plantation, Portuguese, racial divide, racism, Republican Party, slave labor, slavery, slaves
The Left sees Traditional Marriage as a way to make Women Cooks in the Kitchen and Whores in the Bedroom
What’s the difference between conservatives and liberals? Conservatives believe in the genius of the Founding Fathers and embrace the U.S. Constitution. Liberals constantly disparage the Founding Fathers as rich white men who owned slaves. And they bristle at the restraints the Constitution places on them. Conservatives believe in limited government. Liberals believe in big government. Privilege. And feel they are part of an aristocratic class who are exempt from the laws they do not like. Conservatives stand on principle. While liberals will sacrifice principle in the pursuit of power.
The Sixties gave us the Sexual Revolution. Where sex outside of marriage was not only okay it was better. Hippies put sex into everyday ordinary life. Where sex was as causal as an afternoon greeting. Contraception and women’s liberation made the Seventies swing. No one was getting married. They were just living together. And having a lot of sex. With a lot of different people. For it wasn’t the 1950s anymore. No. Women were no longer going to be sexually objectified or trapped into soul-sucking marriages. Which was all the institution of marriage did. Oppressed women.
The Seventies changed all of that. Women could be whatever they wanted to be. And sleep with whoever they wanted to sleep with. For they now had the pill. And when that failed they had abortion. It was truly a time for feminists. As they could be more sexualized than they had ever been before. Those who did get married could ‘swing’ with other married couples. That is, swap wives for sex. Feminists persuaded women to be independent. To have careers. Not to get married. Not to have children. For that would only subjugate them to some man. Where they would end up a cook in the kitchen. And a whore in the bedroom. Serving him. One man. And taking care of a long string of snot-nosed brats sucking the life out of them. This is how the left sees traditional marriage.
Laws encouraged Marriage to Provide more People to Till the Soil and more Soldiers to Defend the Land
So clearly the left had launched a war on the institution of marriage during the Sixties and Seventies. And beyond. For it was everything that was wrong with America. It destroyed a woman’s identity. She even lost her last name. No. It was better for a woman to remain free. And strong. To enjoy sex when she wanted to enjoy sex. Not only when society said she should. In the marital chamber. She should live alone. Or live with someone outside the institution of marriage. So she could remain free. She should have a career. And use birth control and abortion to terminate any pregnancy that could interfere with her career. To remove any reason to consider ever getting married. As well as enjoy the explosion of sexual transmitted diseases her new liberation gave her.
And yet as bad as marriage is the left is trying to make same-sex marriage a Constitutional right. Despite fighting to destroy the institution of marriage for some 3 decades or more. And still fights hard to help women avoid the institution and to keep her family tree a barren one. But when it comes to gays and lesbians who want to get married that changes everything. Marriage is then a beautiful institution where two people can profess their undying love to each other. And denying marital bliss to same-sex couples is discriminatory. Mean. And just plain medieval.
Conservatives oppose same-sex marriage because they don’t want to change the institution of marriage. Which has a tradition that dates back to the beginning of civilization. While there is no such tradition of same-sex marriage. Marriage created the family. Allowing a man and a woman to raise a family. So they can raise, provide for and nurture their children. For unlike most animals in nature whose young can go off on their own after a year or so the human race must spend years rearing their offspring. Which required two parents. One to raise and nurture. And one to provide. Marriage also provided for inheritance. To transfer property down generations. Marriage provided a last name to their children. In time religion entered the marriage ceremony. Adding more tradition. Then came laws to encourage people to marry and raise children. To expand the population. To provide more people to till the soil. And more soldiers to defend the land. As well as increasing the tax base.
The Left attacks the Culture and Traditions of the Political Opposition as they cannot Defeat Them in the Arena of Ideas
So the institution of marriage served many purposes. The most important was to raise children. Because if you couldn’t replace the people killed in battle or died from disease or famine countries would collapse. And because it took so long to rear children traditions and laws developed to facilitate child rearing. Some traditions go back thousands of years. While there is no comparative traditions for same-sex marriage. Or utilitarian purpose for same-sex marriage. Such as expanding the population.
But the left shows no respect for tradition. Unless it’s for a lost tribe in the Amazon that practices cannibalism and human sacrifice. No, that tradition they’ll respect with the reverence of religion. And actively oppose any interruption into their culture or traditions. Even if they are sacrificing young virgins. They’ll fight to protect their culture and tradition. But they have no such respect or reverence for the culture and traditions of Western Civilization.
So the left is many things. But one thing it is not is consistent when it comes to principle. They attack the institution of marriage for those who currently enjoy that institution. While embracing it for those who don’t have it. They will do whatever they can to prevent women from coming down with the ‘disease’ of pregnancy. While championing same-sex couple adoption. They have no tolerance or respect for culture and tradition. Unless it is culture and tradition not found in Western Civilization. Proving that everything to the left is political. And everything they do serves one purpose. To increase their power. And they do that by attacking the culture and traditions of the political opposition. Which they do to destroy them. As they cannot defeat them in the arena of ideas.
Tags: abortion, birth control, children, conservatives, Constitution, culture, family, feminists, Founding Fathers, institution of marriage, liberals, marriage, principle, Religion, reverence, same-sex marriage, Seventies, sixties, tradition, traditional marriage, Western Civilization
Public Schools teach Kids that Republicans are Racist Homophobes who hate Children, Poor People and Immigrants
Americans are historically conservative. Gallup shows that approximately 40% +/- of the people call themselves conservative. While only approximately 20% +/- call themselves liberal. Most of the rest call themselves moderates. Gallup shows this as a general trend from 1992 through 2011 (see Conservatives Remain the Largest Ideological Group in U.S. by Lydia Saad posted 1/12/2012 on Gallup). Yet President Obama is a liberal pushing liberal policies. So how did a conservative nation vote in such a liberal president?
Well, there are the usual suspects. The public schools are teaching our children to be liberal. Thanks to teacher unions. Who contribute generously via their union dues to the Democrat Party in return for favorable policies from the Department of Education. So our public schools work to ‘free’ our children’s minds from the influence of their parents. The push for public-funded childcare is just a way to get our children away from their parents sooner. For the younger they start the longer their education/indoctrination will last.
While our kids are in our public schools they learn the ‘important’ things. Global warming is a reason to tax and regulate business. Capitalism is unfair and evil. Government is good. While glossing over the Founding Fathers and their creation of a government based on the assumption that government is bad. And the less of it the better the people were. No. Our kids don’t learn that. Instead they learn worthless things and come out of our schools knowing very little about their country. Or their government. Just watch Watters’ World on The Factor. And listen to how little our young people know when Jesse Watters asks some basic questions. You’ll get the ‘deer in the headlights’ look when asked a question school children could have answered a generation or two earlier. But despite their lack of knowledge on anything that isn’t trending in social media they will tell you that Fox News is biased. And that Republicans are racist homophobes who hate children, poor people and immigrants. Which is why they vote Democrat.
Democrats expand the Welfare State to get People Dependent on Government Benefits
So there’s public education. And for those who go on to college our public universities will pull these kids even further left. Then there’s the mainstream media. Which is liberal. Reinforcing everything our kids heard in school. And all the people they look up to in the entertainment world tend to be liberal. Further reinforcing what these young people heard in school. Even though only 20% call themselves liberal that 20% is a young person’s world. So a liberal view does not seem like the minority view it is to them. Which is why they vote Democrat.
Then there are public sector unions. And labor unions. Who have a vested interest in keeping Democrats in office. These unions collect dues from their members. And spend a large portion of those dues to help Democrats win elections. In return these Democrats implement union-favorable policies. Also, these union members will act as foot soldiers during elections. Helping to get out the vote. Making phone calls. Going door to door. And helping to get people to the polls to vote Democrat.
Democrats also try to expand the welfare state. To get people dependent on the government. So these people look to government as their sole provider. And after awhile being dependent on the government these people become completely dependent on the government. And fear losing their government benefits. For after being out of work for so long the thought of reentering the workforce is frightening. Which Democrats tell them Republicans want to do. They want to take away their benefits. And force them into hamburger-flipper jobs. Which Democrats point out are beneath them. Even if they have no education or jobs skills beyond entry level employment. So they vote Democrat. To protect their benefits.
Liberals win Elections by Indoctrination, Quid Pro Quo, Dependency, Fear, Patronage and Abuse of Power
But it doesn’t end with simply getting people dependent on government benefits. They implement policies that attack and destroy conservative institutions that encourage people to stand on their own two feet. So they just don’t have to rely on people’s desires and wants. But can tap into their fears. Which is why FDR passed Social Security into Law. And why LBJ expanded Medicare. For these two great liberals knew they could make the elderly permanent Democrat voters by putting the fear of God in them that Republicans will cut their Social Security and Medicare benefits. So a large percentage of seniors vote Democrat. As they won’t be able to pay their bills or see a doctor if they lose their Social Security and Medicare benefits. Because they trusted the government to provide for them in retirement.
And then there’s Obamacare. Which will do to all non-seniors what Social Security and Medicare did to seniors. Put the fear of God into them that Republicans will kill them by cutting their Obamacare benefits. But it’s more than just the fear. Obamacare will require a massive bureaucracy. Layers of new government jobs. Public sector union jobs. Which will do what public sector unions and labor unions do on a grand scale. But the big way Obamacare can help Democrats win elections is having the IRS enforce it. Having the IRS determining who is eligible for a subsidy. Determining how much someone can afford to pay for their Obamacare. And determining how much to fine someone. Allowing the IRS to ‘Tea Party’ the political opposition.
This is how liberals win elections. Not by winning in the arena of ideas. But by indoctrination, quid pro quo, dependency, fear, patronage and using the power of the executive branch for political ends. They’ve become everything the Founding Fathers feared. Who wrote the Constitution specifically to prevent things like this from happening. Who didn’t believe the Constitution was a living document for future generations to interpret and adjust for the times. Because they didn’t write it to give people stuff. They wrote it to restrict the powers of the federal government as much as possible. Because it is government’s nature to oppress and abuse her people. So you don’t want them to have a lot of power. For Lord Acton’s words are just as true today. Power corrupts. And absolute power corrupts absolutely. Something at least 40% of the American people understand.
Tags: arena of ideas, conservative, Democrat, Democrat Party, dependency, dependent, dependent on the government, education, fear, Founding Fathers, government benefits, homophobes, indoctrination, IRS, labor unions, liberal, liberal policies, Medicare, Obamacare, patronage, public schools, public sector unions, quid pro quo, racist, Republicans, Social Security, teacher unions, union dues, vote Democrat, welfare state
(Originally published December 7th, 2011)
African Slaves came to the New World because the Colonists needed Laborers
The Europeans didn’t invent slavery when they introduced it to the New World. It’d been around since the dawn of civilization. And it’s been a way of life in many civilizations for thousands of years. Where no one was safe from the slave traders. Some were born into slavery. Some were simply soldiers captured in battle. Even children were bought and sold. Perhaps the saddest story is the Children’s Crusade of 1212. When about 50,000 poor Christian kids walked from Central Europe to free Palestine from Muslim control and return it to the Christians. They got as far as boarding ships in Italian ports. But those ships did not deliver them to Palestine. They delivered them instead into the Muslim slave markets of Northern Africa and the Middle East. Where they were never heard from again.
African slaves came to the New World because the colonists needed laborers. They tried enslaving the Native Americans. But it was too easy for them to escape back into friendly territory. And blend in with the indigenous population. Not the case with black Africans. Who didn’t know the surrounding country. Or the languages. What they knew was an ocean away. Also, the locals had a tendency of dying from European diseases. Especially smallpox. Whereas the Africans were long exposed to smallpox. And built up some resistance to this scourge of European colonialism.
So the New World colonies began with slaves harvesting their crops. Slaves that the Europeans bought from African slave traders. Who had long been selling captured Africans to the Arabs. And had no problem selling them to the Europeans. And so began the problem of slavery in America.
With the Cotton Gin Separating the Seed from the Cotton Fiber became not so Labor Intensive
When the British American colonists started talking about liberty the slavery problem was the elephant in the room that they were reluctant to talk about. When Jefferson wrote that all men were created equal they knew that meant those enslaved against their will, too. Yet here they were. These liberty-seeking people were enslaving people themselves. But there was a problem. To form a united country the Founding Fathers needed the southern states. Who used slaves as the basis for their economy. And they weren’t going to join a union without their slaves. So they wouldn’t talk about the elephant. Instead they tabled that discussion for 20 years. With the population growing they didn’t need slaves anymore. There were few in the North. And the South should follow suit. It was inevitable. Leaving just one problem to solve. What to do with their slaves as they transitioned to paid laborers. Which the Founding Fathers were sure the southern slave owners could solve within those 20 years.
Slave-labor was not efficient. George Washington wanted to sell his slaves and replace them with paid laborers. Because paid laborers cost less. You only paid them for their labors. And then they went away. And if you changed your crops you could easily hire new laborers skilled in the new crop. Not quite so easy with a large slave labor force. So those in the North had good reason to believe that slavery would slowly give way to paid laborers. Even in the South. Or so they thought. But one of the staple crops of the South started to shape events. Cotton.
Cotton was a labor-intensive crop to harvest. And separating the seed from the cotton was even more labor-intensive. Until someone mechanized this process. With a cotton engine. The cotton gin. Patented in America by Eli Whitney. A hand-cranked device that used hooks to pull the cotton fiber through a screen. The holes in the screen were small enough to let the cotton fiber through. But not large enough for the seeds to pass. With the cotton gin separating the seed from the cotton fiber became not so labor intensive. In fact, these little machines could clean cotton faster than the slaves could harvest it. Which meant, of course, there was a lot more cotton that could be grown and harvested. Which created a new slavery boom. And dashed all the hopes of the Founding Fathers.
Cheap Cloth Unleashed a lot of Economic Activity which Improved the Quality of Life
Many blame the cotton gin for extending the institution of slavery in America. And the bloody American Civil War that ended it. But apart from this the cotton gin was a fundamental step in modernizing economies everywhere. And helped to spur the textile industry forward. By creating an abundant source of material for weaving looms everywhere.
The textile industry was important because everyone wore clothes. And we made clothes from cloth. Once upon a time people made their own clothes. Or spent a lot of money for store-bought clothes. Leaving them with little time or money for other things. So cheap cloth unleashed a lot of economic activity. Which improved the quality of life. The Chinese started this process. By giving us an advanced loom that used foot-power to lift thread. And the spinning wheel to make yarn. All the weavers needed were abundant sources of fiber to feed these machines. Such as American cotton.
The Chinese also made some beautiful silk tapestries with complex patterns. Which were very difficult to reproduce by hand in the West. Until the French automated this process. When Joseph Marie Jacquard improved on the works of Basile Bouchon, Jean Baptiste Falcon and Jacques Vaucanson. And created the Jacquard loom. This automated the pattern process coming from those Chinese looms. By using punch cards to automatically lift the proper threads to reproduce that complex pattern. An impressive advance. But one that did not impress the French. Who were busier with revolution than fancy weaved patterns. But the British were interested. And they used the Jacquard loom in their booming textile industry. Fed largely by that abundant American cotton. Until the American Civil War, at least.
An Advanced Automated and Mechanized Economy has no Room for Slavery
The British also used this punch card idea to automate their shipbuilding industry. To speed up the riveting process. By automating riveting machines. To make ships that carried immigrants to the new world. Who swelled the American population. Making the census taking more and more complex. And another punch card system made counting these people simpler. The tabulator. Where an operator punched holes in a card to represent information for each person. Age. Marital status. Country of origin. Etc. IBM would use this idea of punching information into a card later. To program some of the first computers. Machines that increased efficiencies further. By replacing ever more people with machines.
So it is an interesting turn of events. Eli Whitney created the cotton gin in America. A machine that was part of a series of technological developments that increased efficiencies and reduced the number of workers needed to perform once labor intensive tasks. All during this process fewer people were able to do more things. Except one thing. Planting and harvesting cotton. That would take first a civil war. And then steam-powered farming equipment. To automate farming. Which came later to the South than it did in the slavery-free North. And other parts of the world.
Life got better for everyone the more advanced the economy became. Sure, a lot of people lost jobs. But that’s progress. A few lost jobs is a small price to pay when the masses can enjoy a better life. Thanks to automation and mechanization. And that includes slaves. Or, rather, former slaves. For an advanced automated and mechanized economy has no room for slavery.
Tags: African slaves, Africans, American Civil War, automation, British, cloth, clothes, colonialism, colonists, cotton, cotton fiber, cotton gin, Eli Whitney, European colonialism, Europeans, fiber, Founding Fathers, Jacquard loom, looms, machines, mechanization, New World, North, paid laborers, punch card, slave, slave markets, slave traders, slavery, South, textile industry
The People ratified the Constitution only because George Washington would be the First President
George Washington did not want to be president. After winning the American Revolutionary War his place in history was set. If the first government following the Constitutional Convention failed he didn’t want history to remember him for that. Also, Washington was an old man. Most Washington men were already dead at his age. Something he was very conscious of. And he wanted to live out his remaining days, however few he had, at Mount Vernon. With Martha. But America’s Cincinnatus would, reluctantly, answer the call of duty again.
The new Constitution was not very popular. The old patriots of 1776 hated it. With a passion. While Washington, Alexander Hamilton and others who served in the Continental Army were generally for it. Because they saw how the weak Continental Congress had almost lost the war. Starving the Continental Army of the supplies they needed. Unable even to provide it with shoes and clothing during the long cold winters at Valley Forge and Morristown. And then there was the inflation. Worthless Continental paper dollars that forced the Army to take what they needed to survive. Giving the people they took from IOUs for the Continental Congress to honor later.
With the British defeated the Americans lost the common enemy that held the states together. And they were soon back to looking after their own interests. Charging tariffs to other states. Even sending militias to fight over disputed land. The nation was falling apart before it even became a nation. The Philadelphia Convention addressed these problems. And over a long, hot, humid and horsefly invested convention they wrote a new Constitution. Few loved it. But understood that it was probably the best they would ever get. Ratifying it was another brutal battle. And all throughout this process people reluctantly got on board. Basically because of one thing. The first president would be someone that all the people could trust with such great powers. The man who gave up power when he could have been king. George Washington. So Cincinnatus laid down his plow once more. And went to serve his nation. Again.
The most Important Precedent Washington set was not Exceeding the Limits of the Constitution
This is how it used to be. When our politicians were men of the enlightenment. Disinterested men who went out of their way NOT to profit from the offices they held. Men who would rather have been back home. But reluctantly served. Because the nation needed the best leaders during that formidable time. That’s why Washington served a second term. Not because he wanted to. But if he didn’t Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton would have paralyzed the government with their constant fighting and seething hatred of each other. So Washington stayed on. Father to these children that couldn’t get along. And father to a nation.
Washington was never happier than when he left office. This man who could have been king. Sacrificing all of his wants and desires. And putting the nation first. This old man that was cheating death. Living beyond his years. Who was used to giving orders in the army and having subordinates dutifully following them. He hated the political process. The deal making. The special interests. Those things modern politicians live for. Because it is the pathway to wealth and power. Which is why people serve today. Who do not understand the meaning of selfless disinterest. For they’re in it for number one. And when they leave office they want to have more wealth than they know what to do with it.
Whereas Washington kept true to the Constitution. And didn’t make arguments about it being a living document. Or questioned the intent of the Founding Fathers. For he was one of them. He was there in Philadelphia in 1787. He sat in the chair with that sun on it. The one Benjamin Franklin studied for so long while sitting in that stuffy hall. Wondering if the sun was rising. Or setting. After they signed the Constitution Franklin was certain the sun was rising for the new nation. A nation of laws. Where no man was above the law. And the supreme law of the land was there in the Constitution. Washington was the first president. Setting the precedent for all that would follow. And the most important precedent was not exceeding the limits of the Constitution. For he knew a strong central government was necessary for the nation to have any hopes of surviving. But he feared that once anyone exceeded the limits of the Constitution the whole experiment in self-government would come crashing down.
Life is so Good in an Aristocracy that Politicians will do Anything it takes to Win Reelection
What Thomas Jefferson feared most was consolidation. Fears of a strong central government turning independent states into federal districts of the new government. With growing powers to administer these lands from afar. Turning the people living on these lands once again into subjects of a distant ruling power. Who are there to serve. To be obedient. And revere this distant power. Giving the duly elected president king-like powers. Who would further consolidate his power. This was Jefferson’s fear. A fear Alexander Hamilton did not share. Because he assumed all men in the government would be disinterested men of the enlightenment. Like the Founding Fathers were. But Jefferson knew you could not trust men to refrain from using power given to them. So it was best not to give them that power in the first place.
Today you can see all of Jefferson’s fears come to pass. A federal government larger and more powerful than even Alexander Hamilton could have imagined. And a new fourth branch of government. The IRS. Powerful. And fearsome. Which appears to be helping the current administration to suppress the political opposition. By harassing anyone espousing Jeffersonian principles. Limited government. States’ rights. Constitutional limits. Etc. Which are also Tea Party principles. That set of principles that launched a great grassroots movement that helped the Republicans win back the House of Representatives in 2010. Something the Democrats were very conscious of. And have since pilloried the Tea Party with every invective under the sun. To delegitimize the Tea Party. To prevent another 2010 from happening again.
President Obama is the most liberal president to ever occupy the White House. And he won reelection. Which isn’t easy for a liberal to do on a national stage. Because only about 21% of the people call themselves liberal. While 35% call themselves moderate. And 40% call themselves conservative (see Conservatives Remain the Largest Ideological Group in U.S. posted 1/12/2012 on Gallup). So liberals are in the minority. Yet they hold majority power. Which begs the question. How do they win elections when the majority opposes their ideology? Well, you don’t do it by acting like George Washington. You know, with integrity. But, instead, with rascality. You don’t exactly tell the truth. You make a lot of promises. Even if you have no intention of keeping them. And you use the awesome power of your office to attack your political enemies. For it’s a different mindset today. Whereas the Founding Fathers were trying to destroy an aristocracy today’s politicians are trying to build and maintain one. And life is so good in an aristocracy that once you get in you never want to leave. Which is why politicians will do anything it takes to win reelection. Anything. And if they were honest you’d hear them say so. “Damn the truth, promises and the Constitution. I’m trying to get reelected.” But they’re not honest. So you will never hear them say this. You’ll just have to see it in their deeds. And how unlike the Founding Fathers they are.
Tags: Alexander Hamilton, American Revolutionary War, aristocracy, Cincinnatus, Constitution, Constitutional Convention, Continental Army, Continental Congress, Enlightenment, Founding Fathers, George Washington, Hamilton, Jefferson, Philadelphia, politicians, Revolutionary War, Tea Party, Thomas Jefferson, Washington
« Previous Entries Next Entries »