Week in Review
Walter White could cook the best meth on television. And he could have had the greatest fake drug empire on TV. But there was always one part of the drug business that continued to be the source of all of his trouble. Distribution. As his distributors all tried to kill him. Krazy-8. Tuco. Gus. Lydia. He could cook the meth. But he couldn’t move it. Which forced him into dealing with these people who eventually wanted to kill him. And they would have had Walter not killed them first.
Breaking Bad was only a television show. But it showed a very difficult part of the drug business. Distribution. For you can make or grow all the drugs you want but if you can’t distribute them they won’t make you a dime. Which is why Walter was forced into dealing with these people. Because it’s not easy moving illegal drugs. Even on television.
Colorado has decriminalized marijuana. And they’ve had medical marijuana and medical marijuana pot shops for awhile. A legal way to distribute marijuana. Which may have caught the attention of people in the real drug business (see Colorado Pot Shops Raided By The Feds May Be Shut For Good by Matt Ferner posted 4/15/2014 on Huffington Post).
Four Denver-area medical marijuana businesses may be permanently shuttered after federal officials reportedly probing links with Colombian drug cartels raided the shops in November…
State regulators notified the four shops on April 3 that state licenses to operate as medical marijuana dispensaries and cultivation facilities would be denied. The state alleged violations of state code that in some cases stretched back to 2012, according to state Marijuana Enforcement Division documents.
“You have operated the licensed premises in a manner that adversely affects the public health or welfare or the safety of the immediate neighborhoods in which your establishments are located,” the state notice of denial reads…
The Department of Justice has released little about the raids, which came less than two months before Colorado’s legal recreational marijuana shops opened. Federal authorities suggested the businesses may not have complied with guidelines outlined in DOJ’s August memo that assented to the new retail marijuana laws in Colorado and Washington state…
The DOJ guidance says federal authorities will continue to prosecute to prevent:
•The distribution of marijuana to minors;
•Revenue from the sale of marijuana from going to criminal enterprises, gangs and cartels;
•The diversion of marijuana from states where it is legal under state law in some form to other states…
An unpleasant development for the ‘pot is no worse than alcohol’ crowd. For pot does come with a little excess baggage. A legal pot outlet may provide cover for illegal pot sales. As the Feds’ raid on these Colorado pot shops would suggest. But there is yet another unpleasant development for the ‘pot is no worse than alcohol’ crowd. A study that shows pot may be worse than alcohol (see Casual marijuana use changes brain, new report shows by Kay Lazar posted 4/15/2014 on The Boston Globe).
Young adults who occasionally smoked marijuana show abnormalities in two key areas of their brain related to emotion, motivation and decision making, and the degree of changes appear to be directly related to the number of joints smoked per week, according to a new study by Boston researchers.
Other studies have revealed brain changes among heavy marijuana users, but this research is believed to be the first to demonstrate such abnormalities in young, casual pot smokers.
The scientists did not study whether the changes were linked to corresponding declines in brain function, but say the signs suggest young people might be especially vulnerable because their brains are still developing.
“This is when you are making major decisions in your life, when you are choosing a major, starting a career, making long-lasting friendships and relationships,” said lead author Jodi Gilman, a psychology instructor at Harvard Medical School and a brain scientist at Massachusetts General Hospital.
The findings, to be published Wednesday in the Journal of Neuroscience, come amid an increased debate about the long-term effects of marijuana, as a growing number of states legalize the drug for medicinal and recreational use.
This is a tough development for Democrats. Long seen as the cool political party by the young. Because Democrats are the anti-parents. When Mom and Dad told their kids to wait until they were in a serious relationship before having sex the Democrats passed out free condoms and provided access to abortion. And when Mom and Dad told their children to say ‘no’ to drugs like Nancy Reagan the Democrats have been all for relaxing the drug laws. As the war on drugs was costly and filled our prisons while being ineffective. So the Democrats have been the party of sex and drugs. While the Republicans have been the party of their parents.
So of course the young gravitate to the Democrat Party. As the Democrats support these destructive lifestyles they so enjoy. But as our kids suffer with STDs, deal with a pregnancy while still high school age and suffer from brain damage from smoking marijuana they may have second thoughts about the cool political party. For all Mom and Dad wanted was for them to remain healthy and to be successful. While Democrats appear to facilitate a destructive lifestyle just to win the youth vote.
Tags: brain, brain damage, Colorado, Democrats, destructive lifestyle, distribution, drug business, drugs, marijuana, medical marijuana, pot is no worse than alcohol, pot may be worse than alcohol, pot shops
Week in Review
The left is intolerant of so many things. Cigarettes. Sugary beverages. Hamburgers. And our lack of exercising, our insufficient consumption of fresh fruits & vegetables and our unwillingness to buy electric cars. So they have implemented a lot of taxes, subsidies and regulations to alter our behavior. To make us behave more ‘correctly’. And they are always telling us what we should and what we should not do. Except when it comes to sex and drugs. No. Here they pass out free birth control. And make marijuana legal in Colorado and Washington. Despite all of that unfiltered first, second and third-hand smoke. Odd how these things pose no risk to us unlike drinking a large sugary beverage.
And it’s just not in the United States. All around the world those on the left are telling their people how to live correctly. Except, of course, when it comes to drugs. And sex. Because kids are going to have sex no matter what we say. And if we tell them they shouldn’t it’s only going to make them want to have sex more. Although it is funny that argument doesn’t hold up for cigarettes, sugary beverages, hamburgers, etc. No. For these they can roll up a newspaper and whack us across the nose all day long. Figuratively, of course. But when it comes to sex it’s more of a, “Whoa, now, let’s not say anything hasty here. For who are we to say what is right or wrong for an individual?” But with rising HIV infections perhaps we should be telling our sons and daughters that something bad can happen from having sex. And they would be better off if they didn’t have so much of it before entering into a monogamous, long-term relationship. For if we did and they did over 10% of our populations would not be infected with HIV (see Condoms rebranded in South Africa as HIV infections rise by AFP) posted 4/3/2014 on Yahoo! News).
South Africa is seeking to rebrand its free condoms to appeal to young people after a new study showed rising HIV infections and flagging contraception use, the health department said on Thursday…
South Africa has the world’s highest number of people living with HIV, a crisis that has seen millions of people placed on a vast state-sponsored treatment programme.
Around 6.4 million people — 12.2 percent of the population — were living with HIV or AIDS in 2012.
During the Eighties we didn’t know any better about HIV. But we do now. Even young people. It’s why we give them free condoms. Because of the risk of HIV (among other risks). So it’s frustrating to see risky behavior in young people. Especially those living in a nation with the highest number of people living with HIV. When 12.2% of the population lives with HIV or AIDS it can’t be a secret that HIV is a serious risk. But young people still engage in risky behavior. Which is useful to those on the left. For it helps them win elections. For they are the cool party that doesn’t think drugs are all that bad. And that a little promiscuity isn’t going to kill you. “You’ll be fine,” they say on the left. “As long as you don’t smoke a cigarette, drink a sugary beverage or eat a hamburger you should be able to enjoy all the sex and drugs you want to. Because sex and drugs can’t hurt you. Only those other things can. Well, those things. And global warming. Those are the things to worry about. Not catching HIV or AIDS.” At least this is the message they’re giving our kids.
Tags: cigarettes, condoms, drugs, free condoms, hamburgers, HIV, HIV infections, risky behavior, sex, sex and drugs, South Africa, sugary beverages, young people
Christians believe in the Reward of Hard Work and Shun Idleness for it tends to Invite Trouble
Liberals are very confident people. As well as arrogant. Narcissistic. And condescending. Which is why they are so secular. Wanting to take the separation of church and state argument to the extreme. Attacking and mocking Christianity every chance they get. As they don’t like anyone judging them. Or setting some moral standard. For liberals are a sinful people.
The Seven Deadly Sins are wrath, greed, sloth, pride, lust, envy, and gluttony. Christians try to avoid these. They forgive their enemies instead of getting angry at them. They tithe to their church instead of keeping all of their money greedily for themselves. They believe in the reward of hard work and shun idleness for it tends to invite trouble. They are humble and don’t strive for attention. They have strong self-control and make sacrifices for a better future instead of giving in to current wants and desires. They tend to be happy with what they have however modest their lives may be. Instead of being envious of others. They don’t eat, drink or live to excess, preferring to do everything in moderation. Things you just don’t associate with liberals.
Now think of some liberals you know of. Think of the vicious things liberal Democrats say about Republicans (such as a campaign commercial showing a Republican pushing ‘Grandma’ off a cliff). The vulgar things some liberal commentators say about Republican women. And the ridicule of conservatives on late-night television. Rich liberals who want to raise taxes on the rich (which includes the middle class) to pay for a generous welfare state while giving little to charity themselves. As they are far more generous with other people’s money than with their own. And never risk their own money in risky investments such as Solyndra. Preferring to risk the taxpayers’ money.
Liberals attack the Rich because they are Envious of their Hard Work and Success
Liberals always want a bigger federal government with an ever-growing bureaucracy. So they can be career politicians without ever getting a real job where they have to work hard to earn a living. Liberals like to brag about how smart they are and how brilliant their legislation is. Taking credit for things they didn’t even do. Such as President Obama taking credit for the surge in natural gas production done on private land by private companies. Or boasting how their economic policies are working even though the real unemployment rate is in excess of 13% (when you count those who have left the labor force and those who can only find a part-time job). And their refusal to admit they wrote a terrible law. Such as Obamacare.
Liberals never want to wait for anything. They don’t believe in hard work. They believe in early retirement and generous pensions. For their friends in the union. Like the UAW. In the public sector unions. And those in government jobs. They attack the rich because they resent their hard work and success. Are envious of them. And want to punish them because they were never as good as they are. With higher tax rates. And punishing regulations. Hollywood celebrities and the Washington elite live the most extravagant lives. In some of the most expensive homes which are filled with the finest food, drink and toys. And when that’s not enough some further their excess with drugs.
These are things you just don’t associate with Christians. In fact, these are things Christians frown upon. Even telling their congregation not to live lives like these in their church services. For these are not Christian lives. Some people could have everything they could possibly want or desire but are still not happy. Or are bored because it came too easily. Or too soon. Turning to other outlets to excite them. Alcohol and drugs. Drag-racing in expensive sports cars on neighborhood streets. Partying all night in the hottest clubs. Or blowing a lot of money gambling. Anything to escape the boredom of an idle life.
For a Better Life we should Shun Liberalism and Embrace Free Market Capitalism
This is why liberals attack Christianity so much. As well as one other reason. Because they don’t like believing in a higher being. For they are so arrogant and narcissistic that they can’t stand the thought of some being that is greater than themselves. For they hold liberalism sacred. And if anyone worships anything they want the people to worship them. Because they believe they are the smartest and the most insightful people in the universe. Yes, vanity, thy name is liberalism. Which is why they believe they should control government. And our lives. Because they’re smarter and wiser than business owners. Bankers. Entrepreneurs. And market forces. For they are the higher being. Not what those silly Christians worship.
A lot of people have felt like this throughout history. Adolf Hitler. Mao Zedong. Saddam Hussein. Benito Mussolini. Muammar Gaddafi. Kim Il-sung. Kim Jong-il. Kim Jong-un. Fidel Castro. Supreme leaders and ruthless dictators who preferred their people to worship them like a god. And imposed socialism, fascism or communism on their people. Using their supreme intelligence and insight to make the state a better place for the people. Making the state supreme. While subordinating the individual. And elevating the supreme leader above everyone. Something liberals have been trying to do all their lives. Only without the torture and genocide.
But their efforts share a similar trend with these ruthless dictators. The quality of life declines under their rule. Some of the worst places to live when it comes to human rights have been in Nazi Germany, the People’s Republic of China, Iraq, Fascist Italy, Libya, North Korea and Cuba. While some of the best countries to live in are the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia and Hong Kong. All once part of the Christian British Empire. An empire that embraced free market capitalism. And when people practice self-control and make sacrifices for the future engage in free market capitalism they make a better place to live. At least this is what history has shown us. So if we want a better life we should shun liberalism. And embrace free market capitalism. For liberty, thy name is capitalism.
Tags: arrogant, capitalism, Christianity, Christians, conservatives, Democrats, dictators, drugs, envious, excess, free market, free-market capitalism, hard work, higher being, human rights, idle life, liberalism, liberals, liberty, narcissistic, Republicans, sacrifice, self-control, sin, vanity
The Democrat Party is the Cool Uncle that buys Booze and Cigarettes for his Nieces and Nephews
People characterize the Republicans as being a bunch of old fogies. Out of touch. Who don’t have a clue about the world today. Unlike their children
do. Who are wise beyond their years. For they know there is nothing really bad with underage drinking and smoking. Smoking marijuana. Or doing other drugs. And there is nothing wrong with casual sex. Sexting. Or nude selfies.
This is why the children of old fogies like the Democrat Party. Because the Democrats get them. Unlike their parents. Their parents tell them they shouldn’t stay out late, drink, smoke, do drugs or have sex. While the Democrats decriminalize marijuana and work to decriminalize other drugs. Provide free birth control. And abortion without parental notification. Making the Democrat Party the cool uncle that buys booze and cigarettes for his nieces and nephews. So is it any wonder that the youth vote goes Democrat?
The ironic thing, though, is that these old fogies were once young themselves. And some were pretty wild in their youth, too. But once they became parents things changed. For when it’s their daughter they don’t want her being objectified. Encouraged to explore her sexuality by having so much casual sex that she catches a sexually transmitted disease or gets pregnant. Especially if they did in their youth. Which is the last thing they want for their little girl. Who is and will forever remain their little girl.
Keynesian Economics conditioned People to accept that Government knows Best
This is the rule. Not the exception. As kids grow up fighting their parents they reach a point in life where they realize that their parents were right all along. That if they had only spent more time on their homework and less time partying things would have turned out better. Life may have been less fun in the short-run but much better in the long-run. They’d had an earlier start in their career. A career with better pay and benefits. They could have bought a house sooner. Met someone to marry and start a family with sooner. Instead of finding themselves at 25 buried under student loan debt for a degree that can’t get them a job. And a decade or so of hooking up having conditioned men to shun any serious commitment. Leading their daughters to turn to serial dating and online dating. As they struggle to find someone else who has grown up, too.
This is what the old fogies know. That their kids don’t. You get wiser with age. Thanks to education. And experience. Two things the young just don’t have. And never will. Because by the time they grow wise from education and experience they are no longer kids. But well on their way to ‘old fogery’. Which is, of course, a problem for the Democrat Party. For a wise voting public will not help them win elections. As their Keynesian economic policies have nothing but a long record of failure. Giving us the Great Depression, the stagflation of the 1970s, the dot-com recession and the Great Recession. To name a few bad economic times Keynesian economics have given us. Things older people know from education and experience. But the kids voting Democrat don’t.
Keynesian economics ushered in the era of Big Government. And did something the Socialists could not. Conditioned people to accept that government knows best. Especially young people. Uneducated and inexperienced young people. Despite the Democrats’ horrible record concerning things economic. Because of this record the Democrats use lies and deceit to attack free market capitalism. That economic system that worked better than any other. To get people who knew no better to mistrust free market capitalism. And ask for the government to fetter unfettered capitalism. To make the world a fairer place.
The Democrats use Public Education to teach our Kids to Distrust Capitalism and to Trust Government
It sounds good to the inexperienced and uneducated. Because it feels good to think in terms of fairness. And if there is one thing the young have are emotions. They like to use their hearts. Not their brains. As they are idealistic and naïve. Unlike those old fogies who are realists. They can’t be fooled or swayed by the Democrat lies because they have learned and experienced a lot in their long lives. And heard the same old Democrat lies all through those long lives. Which is why the Democrats work so hard on the youth vote. The War on Women, their lax drug attitudes, birth control, abortion, gay rights…all of these are to get the young to think in terms of fairness. To tug on their heartstrings. To get them emotional. And keep them emotional. As well as ignorant.
The more ignorant people are the easier it is to lie to them. Anyone who knows the history of Western Civilization will understand how life became better for people as we moved closer to free market capitalism. Anyone who knows classical economics will understand how thrift, savings, free trade, sound money, etc., made America the number one economy in the world. While the Keynesian policies of today are threatening to knock America out of that number one spot. People who understand these things are not going to vote Democrat. Which is why the Democrats work hard to keep people from learning these things. By constantly lying about them. And not teaching them in the institutions they control. Our public schools. And our institutions of higher education.
The Republican equation for winning votes is a difficult equation. Knowledge + Experience + Reason = Republican Votes. It’s difficult because the Democrats have long controlled public education. Thanks to their friends in the teacher unions. And their friends running our institutions of higher education. Which spend more time teaching our kids to distrust capitalism. And to trust government. To feel more. And think less. To live for today. And not worry about tomorrow. Making it very difficult for the Republicans to get young voters to vote for them. As they are unknowledgeable (thanks to our public schools), inexperienced (because they are young) and prefer emotion over reason (because feeling is more fun than thinking). Which is why old fogies (the knowledgeable, experienced and thinking) vote Republican and the youth vote does not.
Tags: abortion, birth control, capitalism, casual sex, deceit, Democrat, Democrat Party, Democrats, distrust capitalism, drugs, education, emotions, experience, free market, free-market capitalism, government knows best, higher education, ignorant, Keynesian, Keynesian economic, lies, marijuana, old fogies, parents, public schools, Republican, Republicans, trust government, young people, youth vote
Week in Review
Young people, old hippies, college students, liberals, etc., are all rejoicing over the decriminalization of marijuana in Colorado and Washington. Heck, they’d like to go even further. And decriminalize all drugs. So they can use whatever they want. Enjoy whatever high. As these people want to escape reality by staying high. Apparently. It’s so important to these people that President Obama told his Justice Department not to enforce federal drug laws in these states. Because these are Democrat voters. And he wants to keep them happy. So they continue to vote Democrat. Besides, drugs are a victimless crime. What’s the worst that can happen (see Man says he stole car to trade for heroin, authorities say by Erika Pesantes posted 2/7/2014 on the Sun Sentinel)?
A man stole a car in Oakland Park and crashed into two vehicles as he fled from deputies Thursday, authorities said. He says he stole the car to trade it for heroin because he was “dope sick,” a Broward sheriff’s report said.
Don’t know if this is the worst that can happen but it’s pretty bad. This is a problem with escaping reality by staying high all day long. You won’t be able to hold a job. Because ‘high’ people are worthless in the workplace. So even if these ‘high’ people actually got a job their drug use would ultimately get them fired. Leaving them with a costly drug habit. And no income. Hence the turning to crime to support their habit.
Decriminalizing marijuana/all drugs does not make this problem go away. In fact it only makes it worse. For they talk about decriminalizing drugs so the government can regulate them. And tax them. Just like they do with liquor. Which, by the way, isn’t free. To enjoy liquor you first must buy it. Which requires some source of income. So drugs will be legal but they will be more costly (thanks to regulations and taxation). And the readily available supply of drugs (because they are no longer illegal) will encourage people to stay high. Giving them costly drug habits just as they lose their jobs. Leaving them little choice but to become a thief (or a prostitute) to raise their drug money. Which is happening now when all drugs are illegal in most states. Imagine how that will change when more states decriminalize them.
Tags: decriminalization of marijuana, Democrat, drug habit, drugs, escaping reality, liquor, marijuana
Week in Review
Philip Seymour Hoffman was found dead today from an apparent drug overdose. Sad. Such a great talent. The characters he brought to life helped us escape from our troubles for a couple of hours. He could be a bit of a curmudgeon in real life, though. But a warmth shone through the characters he played. He worked hard to polish his craft. And he was a natural. Likeable. Even if you didn’t like the movie he was in you enjoyed seeing him in it. It is so sad that drugs have taken yet another great talent from us (see Philip Seymour Hoffman Found Dead at 46 by Jenny Depper posted 2/2/2014 on Yahoo! Movies).
Academy Award winner Philip Seymour Hoffman was found dead in his New York City apartment on Sunday. He was 46.
The New York City Police Department confirmed to “The Insider With Yahoo” that the actor was found dead at 12 p.m. ET in his fourth floor apartment in the Greenwich Village of New York City.
While the official cause of death is still unknown at this point, police speculate that he may have died of a drug overdose. The actor was found with a needle in his arm and apparent heroin was found at the scene…
Hoffman had struggled with addiction in the past, but was reportedly clean for 23 years before falling off the wagon in 2012. He most recently checked into rehab in May 2013.
In a 2006 interview with CBS’ “60 Minutes,” Hoffman discussed his earlier drug use dating back to the time after his graduation from New York University’s drama school.
“It was all that [drugs and alcohol], yeah, it was anything I could get my hands on… I liked it all,” Hoffman said. Eventually, he chose to seek treatment. “I went [to rehab], I got sober when I was 22 years old. You get panicked… and I got panicked for my life. It really was just that.”
He also revealed that his drug habit was life-threatening. “I have so much empathy for these young actors that are 19 and all of a sudden they’re beautiful and famous and rich. I’m like, ‘Oh my God. I’d be dead.’ You know what I mean? I’d be 19, beautiful, famous and rich. That would be it. I think back at that time. I think if I had the money, that kind of money and stuff. So, yeah [I would have died].”
Every time there is another death caused by a firearm the left screams for new gun control legislation. But when a great talent dies from a drug overdose you hear no cry from the left for new drug control legislation. No. Instead they celebrate Colorado and Washington for decriminalizing recreational marijuana. Because, as the left says, marijuana is safer than alcohol.
But making marijuana more readily available will only make more kids start using it. Just as it made out-of-state college applications explode in those two states. Because these kids want to get high. And will get high. For the more readily available marijuana is the more they will get high. Developing new drug habits. And then, perhaps, moving on to something stronger. Like heroin. Which Hoffman didn’t start with. But he ended with. And no doubt more will. Because while the left calls for new gun control legislation whenever anyone dies by a firearm they have no problem with people developing drug habits. They even encourage it with pushing for the decriminalization of marijuana for recreational use. The drug pretty much everyone who ever died from a drug overdose started with.
Tags: addiction, alcohol, drug habits, drug overdose, drugs, firearm, great talent, gun control legislation, heroin, marijuana, Philip Seymour Hoffman
Some of the Richest People in the United States live in the Suburbs of Washington, D.C.
Liberals say they care about the people. While they say conservatives only care about their money. Conservatives want to cut taxes and government spending so they can keep more of their money to spend on their families. Liberals want to increase taxes and government spending. To take more money from taxpayers to spend on other people. People who are more deserving of that money than the people who earned it.
Liberals say they want to tax and spend because they care about people. And not money. Like conservatives. Yet the more money a liberal government collects in taxes the more powerful that government grows. And the richer those in government get. Just look at the wealth surrounding Washington, D.C., which includes six of the ten wealthiest counties in the U.S. It used to be the military industrial complex. Now it’s the government industrial complex. For liberals do not like the military. And gut defense spending to fund their welfare state. Spending our money to reward their friends. And buying votes by making people dependent on government.
Some of the richest people in the United States live in the suburbs of Washington, D.C. Who got rich on taxpayer money. Where those connected to the liberal aristocracy enjoy obscene levels of wealth. While the median family income falls. Leaving families in the rest of the country to get by on less. While those connected to government enjoy those obscene levels of wealth. Yet liberals care about the people. And not these obscene levels of wealth.
Liberals have grown Very Wealthy by Caring for the People ‘instead’ of Money
So it’s no secret the more money the government collects the better liberals in government live. The bigger government grows the more government jobs that are available. Allowing liberals to spread the wealth. Other people’s wealth, that is. So it’s good for those inside the government aristocracy. Which is why liberals ‘care’ about the people. So they can run a massive welfare state. With them at the top. Like Old World royalty. Passing alms out to the people. Where the people grovel. And are obedient. Grateful for what royalty gives them. Thanking them politely. And never forgetting their place. The dirt beneath their feet (to borrow a line from the musical Les Misérables).
It is hard, then, to believe liberals when they say they care about the people. As caring for the people has made them very wealthy. Wealth they acquired by taking it away from other people. Via taxes. It is harder still to believe them when you look at their actions. Whenever there is a high-profile gun crime, for example, they immediately use it to advance gun control legislation. As if America is suffering from a plague of gun deaths. And that only when the government takes away guns from law-abiding gun owners will the dying stop. Of course, others throughout history have wanted to take away the people’s guns. Including the British in 1775. When the shot heard ’round the world was fired. Kicking off the Revolutionary War.
So Americans are very suspect whenever anyone comes after their guns. Because that means only one thing. Those trying to take away those guns want to make these gun owners weaker. The question is, why? Why do governments want to make their people weaker? Probably for the same reason ruling elites everywhere do. When you’re greatly outnumbered you don’t want the people you’re oppressing to be able to fight back.
For Every Person who ‘picked’ an Obamacare Policy 38 People lost the Insurance they Liked and Wanted to Keep
Listening to liberals you would think that the only way people are dying in America is from gun violence. Is this true? If not exactly how are people dying? Well, according to the Centers for Disease and Prevention (see Table 2. Deaths, death rates, and age-adjusted death rates for 113 selected causes, Injury by firearms, Drug-induced Injury at work, and Enterocolitis due to Clostridium difficile: United States, final 2010 and preliminary 2011) the total deaths in 2011 was 2,512,873. Some of the leading causes of death were cardiovascular diseases at 778,503 (31.0%). Cancers (Malignant neoplasms) at 575,313 (22.9%). Chronic lower respiratory diseases at 143,382 (5.7%). Just with these three groups of diseases we’re at 59.6% of all 2011 deaths. And that’s before we get to non-disease related deaths. Such as Drug-induced deaths at 40,239 (1.6%). Motor vehicle accidents at 34,677 (1.4%). Falls at 26,631 (1.1%). And one of the least causes of deaths. Assault (homicide) by discharge of firearms at 11,101 (0.4%).
Gun deaths account for less than one half of one percent of all deaths in 2011. Yet they want to take guns away from law-abiding gun owners to stop an epidemic of gun deaths totaling 0.4% of all deaths in 2011. That’s what liberals are focused on. That. And the decriminalization of drugs. Because drugs are a victimless crime. Something only responsible adults choose to do. Despite drug-induced deaths being more than three and half times greater than gun deaths. But liberals are hard on guns. And soft on drugs. Even though more people die from drugs than from guns. Yet liberals care about people.
The Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) was to provide affordable health insurance to about 50 million of uninsured people. With the rollout of Obamacare only 106,185 ‘picked’ an insurance policy in October (some may have bought a plan or simply placed one in their shopping cart). While 4.02 million people in 28 states have lost their health insurance (see White House to Allow Insurers to Continue Canceled Health Plans by Carol E. Lee and Louise Radnofsky posted 11/14/2013 on The Wall Street Journal). So for every person who ‘picked’ an insurance policy 38 people lost the insurance they liked and wanted to keep. Considering 59.6% of all deaths in 2011 were from heart disease, cancer and chronic lower respiratory diseases taking away health insurance from 4.02 million people could very well cause more people to die from these diseases. For they are very common diseases. And these policy cancellations are only from the individual market. When the cancellations for the employer-provided plans start hitting next year we may be seeing hundreds of millions who will lose their health insurance. Which is by design. To force the people who already have insurance into costlier plans to pay for those who don’t. And, of course, to make government bigger. As well as making liberals in the government aristocracy wealthier.
Whenever there is a high-profile gun death the left renews their push for new gun control legislation. Even if it saves only one child. They say this despite guns being responsible for less than one half of one percent of all deaths. Yet when they take away health insurance from 4.02 million people who may die from heart disease, cancer and chronic lower respiratory diseases, these deaths are negligible. Acceptable. A small percentage of the population whose deaths won’t mean a thing in the grand scheme of things. All that is important to them is protecting and growing the government aristocracy. So they can continue to live in the wealthiest counties in the U.S. While enjoying their regal lives paid for with other people’s money. Yet it’s the liberals that care about people.
Tags: aristocracy, cancer, chronic lower respiratory diseases, conservatives, drugs, government aristocracy, government spending, gun control, gun control legislation, gun crime, gun deaths, guns, heart disease, law-abiding gun owners, liberals, liberals care about the people, Obamacare, obscene levels of wealth, royalty, taxes, taxpayers, wealth, welfare state
Week in Review
Cory Monteith’s death is a warning. Kids should listen to their parents more. And to the Democrats less (see ‘Glee’ actor Corey Monteith died of heroin, alcohol mix by JEREMY HAINSWORTH, Associated Press, posted 10/2/2013 on The Kansas City Star).
The British Columbia Coroners Service said Wednesday investigators found a spoon with drug residue and a used hypodermic needle in the hotel room where “Glee” actor Cory Monteith was found dead in July.
The coroner’s final report issued Wednesday, confirmed initial findings that Monteith died from using intravenous heroin combined with alcohol…
The investigation said Monteith had a history of illicit drug use with intermittent periods of rehabilitation and of abstinence from drugs…
His death recalled the lives of Heath Ledger, Corey Haim and River Phoenix — actors who battled substance abuse and died in their 20s and 30s.
Monteith had talked bluntly about struggling with addiction since he was a teenager, calling it a serious problem and telling Parade magazine in 2011 he was “lucky to be alive.”
In that interview, he said he was using marijuana and drinking by age 13, and his drug use was “out of control” by the time he was 16. “Anything and everything, as much as possible,” he said. “I had a serious problem.”
People always like to make a comparison between marijuana and alcohol. That marijuana is no worse than alcohol. But there is only one drunk. While there are many highs. With the next high always promising to be better than the last high. Something we call chasing the dragon. That often ends in overdoses. And death. Like in Monteith’s case.
Notice the drug Monteith started with. Marijuana. Which is why marijuana isn’t like alcohol. Because there aren’t new ways of getting drunk when an old way of getting drunk bores you. Not so with drugs. Where amateurs and novices start off with marijuana. Until it bores them. Then they start looking for new highs. Better highs. Until one day they start injecting drugs of dubious origin into their veins.
People don’t start by injecting drugs of dubious origin into their veins. That’s an experienced drug user. Who worked their way up to heroin. After starting with marijuana. The very drug states are now starting to decriminalize. While the federal government looks the other way. If marijuana is no longer illegal more people are likely to try it. Get bored with it. And move on to other drugs. Just like Monteith, Heath Ledger, Corey Haim and River Phoenix did. And countless children whose deaths didn’t make it into the news. With countless others soon to follow.
The young like the Democrats. Because they are not their parents. Instead of saying ‘no’ to sex and drugs the Democrats give out free birth control. Resulting in an explosion of sexually transmitted diseases. Especially among young girls. Who will have to live with that for the rest of their lives. Even when trying to find someone to marry and start a family with. Which an STD doesn’t make easy. While other girls become mothers before they leave high school. Setting back any career plans they may have had as they can’t raise their children and go off to college. While others get abortions. Which some regret as they grow older. Not all. But those who do can’t stop thinking about the life that didn’t happen because of what they did. When they made a decision as a child their grownup self regrets. So the Democrats really mess up young people’s lives. And if that damage wasn’t enough they are now making it easier to become a drug addict. By making the number one gateway drug no longer illegal.
Democrats will do anything to secure the youth vote. Even if they destroy their lives in the process. Which they often do. In fact, they’re destroying their entire generation with the debt they’re going to leave them. While at the same time impoverishing them with Obamacare. Where the young and healthy will pay for the health care of the old and sick. Leaving them with little now. And even less to save for their own retirement. Making the Democrats young people’s worst enemy. Yet the Democrats have fooled them into believing that they are their best friend. Just goes to show you what you can do if you have no conscious. Which is easier to do when you get rid of God everywhere. For if there is no God what do you have to worry about in this life when you believe there is no afterlife? Talk about your freedoms. Freedom from empathy. Something that comes in handy for a ruling class interested only in power.
Tags: addiction, alcohol, Cory Monteith, Democrats, drug user, drugs, heroin, injecting drugs, marijuana, Monteith, overdose, parents
Week in Review
Every time someone dies from a gunshot the left screams we have to do something to get these guns out of the hands of people. For if people didn’t have guns no one would die. Because it’s not people killing people with guns. It’s the guns that are killing people. And the people shooting the guns just happen to be there.
This is the logic on the left. But yet when kids die in hot cars or because of the neglect of stoned parents they don’t say anything about getting rid of cars. Or getting rid of drugs (see Hot Car Baby Death: ‘Joint-Smoking Dad’ Charged posted 8/30/2013 on Sky News).
A father has been accused of leaving his baby to suffocate in a parked car in temperatures of 100F, as he smoked cannabis in a sports bar…
It was thought Gray was distracted and forgot about the boy.
But Mr Thompson said police later came to suspect Gray was smoking cannabis with a work companion during the time his son was in the vehicle.
Outside temperatures were about 100 degrees, but interior car temperatures are frequently much higher.
Parents sometimes forget about a child in the back seat of a car. Usually when there is a change in routine. People soon forget in their busy life that today they have the child. Then accidents happen. And the Democrats are to blame.
The cost of the welfare state has made it hard for a single income to raise a family. Which is why children are spending so much time in cars. Getting shuttled between childcare and home. Like laundry going to and from the cleaners. Just another chore to tend to. Because taxes are so high today that a parent can’t stay at home to raise their children. They have to get back to work as soon as they can.
And it’s been the Democrats who have been for the decriminalization of marijuana. For two reasons. A lot the hippies from the Sixties who spent their time then getting high still like to light up to get high. When they’re not busy writing the curriculum for our children’s schools. And it’s a great way to get the youth vote. By being everything a kid’s parents are not. Sure, kid, sex and getting high are okay. You vote for us and we’ll make sex and drugs a simpler part of your life. But how many frizzled parents do we want out there getting high when they drive? With their child in the back seat? No. Nothing good can come from making it easier to drive and smoke marijuana.
If it saves just one child then it’s worth doing. That’s what they say about restrictions on gun ownership. And if it’s good for guns than it must be good for marijuana. It needs to be banned. For the children.
Tags: cannabis, child, Democrats, drugs, guns, marijuana, parent, parked car
Week in Review
People hate pharmaceutical companies. They think they’re gouging them on the price of their medication. If the people only knew what it cost to bring a new drug to market (see The Truly Staggering Cost Of Inventing New Drugs by Matthew Herper posted 2/10/2012 on Forbes).
The average drug developed by a major pharmaceutical company costs at least $4 billion, and it can be as much as $11 billion…
Bernard Munos of the InnoThink Center for Research In Biomedical Innovation…divided each drug company’s R&D budget by the average number of drugs approved…
The range of money spent is stunning. AstraZeneca has spent $12 billion in research money for every new drug approved, as much as the top-selling medicine ever generated in annual sales; Amgen spent just $3.7 billion. At $12 billion per drug, inventing medicines is a pretty unsustainable business. At $3.7 billion, you might just be able to make money (a new medicine can probably keep generating revenue for ten years; invent one a year at that rate and you’ll do well).
…the main expense is failure.
Why include failure in the cost? Right now, fewer than 1 in 10 medicines that start being tested in human clinical trials succeed…
It really does cost billions of dollars to invent new medicines for heart disease, cancer, or diabetes. The reality is that the pharmaceutical business is in the grip of rising failure rates and rising costs. We can all only hope that new technologies and a better understanding of biology will turn things around.
This is why our medicines are so expensive. And why we have to wait for patents to run out before cheap generics hit the market. Because whoever will manufacture those cheap generics didn’t have to spend $12 billion to bring the drug to market.
If drug companies can’t recover these massive costs they may do something worse than charge us an arm and a leg for a drug that will save our life. They may stop bringing drugs that can save our life to market.
People say the profit incentive shouldn’t guide something as important as health care and medicine. But what is the alternative? Have the government spend $12 billion to develop a life-saving drug? Because they’re so smart and motivated by social responsibility? Instead of profit? Yeah, they sure can pick winners in the private sector. Like Solyndra. If you’re not familiar with the name it’s because Solyndra filed bankruptcy. Because their solar panels were the wrong solar panels to bet on in the private sector. But the federal government bet $535 million in loan guarantees because they were so sure that Solyndra was a winner. And their bankruptcy shows why we don’t want the government spending $12 billion to develop a life-saving drug. For the federal government is just not good at bringing things to market.
So if we want these life-saving drugs we have to let these drug companies recoup the $12 billion they spent to bring a new drug to market. For the sad reality is that $12 billion is a bargain compared to what the government would spend.
Tags: drugs, life-saving drug, medicine, new drug, pharmaceutical, pharmaceutical company, profit, R&D