Children only care about the Here and Now and Instant Gratification
“Mom, can I eat this whole birthday cake?” “No.” “Dad, can I stay up past my bed time?” “No.” “Mom, can I go out and play instead of cleaning my room?” “No.” “Dad, can I skip my homework and play football with the guys?” “No.” “Mom, can I go to the concert with Billy and his big brother?” “No.” “Dad, can I use your table saw?” “No.” “Mom, will you buy me this micro dress for the dance?” “No.” “Dad, can I borrow the car this Friday to drive to a party?” “No.” “Mom, can I have boys in my bedroom?” “Hell no.” “Dad, can I have $50?” “For what?” “Stuff?” “What kind of stuff?” “You know, stuff.” “Oh, in that case, no.”
“No.” It is the most important word in a parent’s vocabulary. For kids want to do a lot of things that aren’t good for them. Things that will get them into trouble. Things that might hurt them. Things that may leave them with unpleasant and/or long-lasting consequences. Parents have to say ‘no’ because kids just don’t know any better. They only think about the here and now. Not about the future. They want instant gratification. They want to have fun. They don’t want to wait. They don’t want to work. And the last thing they want to do is to delay gratification.
So parents have to keep saying ‘no’ for their children’s own good. At least, responsible parents do. Because parents are older and wiser than their children. Contrary to popular belief children have about their parents. Children like to say that their parents “don’t know anything.” But they do. In fact, they know a lot. Because they were once impulsive children having the same arguments with their parents. And now that they are parents they see the world differently than they did as children. They see it as their parents saw it. And realize that their parents were right all along. Thanks to a lot more education, a lot more work experience and a lot more life experience. The things that makes one wiser as one gets older.
Children who never Grow Up as Adults tend to Remain Liberal and Vote Democrat
Children that grow up into responsible adults tend to be more conservative. They get jobs. Straight out of high school. Or after college. And party less. They cut back on reckless behavior. Such as drinking and driving. Because they realized they could get a DUI. They could hurt themselves. Or, worse, hurt someone else. If they used drugs they cut back. Some stop using them completely. They stop having casual sex with random people. In part to avoid an STD. In part because they want something more than just a good time. So they, instead, get married. And settle down. Raise a family. And it’s about this time that these one-time wild liberals start voting Republican. As they see there is a lot more to life than partying with booze and drugs. And having sex. Especially when they become parents.
Becoming a parent changes a person. Single coworkers may still want to go out and get a drink after work. They may look forward to the weekend so they can drink themselves into a stupor. But not a married person. At least, not a married responsible grownup. They want to go straight home to their wife. Or husband. They want to spend time with their kids. And they don’t want to do anything that could harm their kids. Like risking their job by coming in late hung over after a night of excessive drinking. They’d rather get to work early. Do their job. And build a successful career. That is both personally satisfying. And takes care of their family. Something sobriety helps. And our days tend to be easier when they don’t start with a hangover.
Children who never grow up as adults, on the other hand, tend to remain liberal. Focused on the here and now. Without a thought about the future. For them gratification is all that matters. These people tend to keep the wild ways of their youth. And those who go on to college take it up a notch. Away from their parents incessant ‘no’s they can finally say ‘yes’ to everything. And a lot of them do. They’ll get drunk and video things with their smartphones. And upload them to the Internet. The kind of things you once had to go to a pornography store to buy. But they and their friends will post these videos for all the world to see. And these things will still be floating around the Internet years later when they’re saying ‘no’ to their own children. Or interviewing for a job. Jessie Watters on The O’Reilly Factor has interviewed some of these young college students on spring break. Asking them questions about history. International events. Current events at home. And if they could identify members of the Federal government. Few could. Very few. Because they have more pressing things in their lives apparently than getting an education. At least based on what they’re doing with their smartphones.
Democrats only care about the Here and Now and Instant Gratification
Liberal Democrats love these kids. For they know all they want is to have fun. So they become the party of fun. Free birth control. Access to abortion. Decriminalizing marijuana. Anti-religion. No moral absolutes. Anything goes. Even encouraging reckless behavior (they’re going to have sex anyway so we might as well make it easier for them). Veritable anti-parents. Who tell these kids that they (these kids) know what’s best for them. Not their parents. And if they want instant gratification that’s okay. You don’t have to worry about the future because if you vote Democrat that’s something else we’ll do for you besides the birth control, abortion, marijuana and the lack of moral constraints. If you vote Democrat we’ll take care of you from cradle to grave. Just like that The Life of Julia slideshow promised. With so little education, work experience and life experience these kids don’t know any better and say, “Okay. Where do I vote.”
So the Democrats use these kids to stay in office. They know little so it is easy to lie to them. About the ‘evil Republicans’ that are as big a killjoy as their parents. And about how much better the Democrats are going to make their lives. If only they keep voting Democrat. So they do. Because the Democrats offer everything an irresponsible adult could want. Which is a shame as a lot of what the Democrats offer is bad for the rest of us. And the country. Their Keynesian economics fails over and over yet they keep using these failed policies of the past. Putting the country further into debt. And further depreciating the dollar. They lie to these kids about global warming. Allowing the Democrats to remain in power and pass crippling regulations. Threatening the coal industry. As well as increasing our energy costs. They want to raise the minimum wage for unskilled, entry-level jobs. Reducing the number of entry level jobs available for those looking to enter the workforce. And they want to take over our health care. The best health care system in the world. Replacing it with something not as good and more costly.
But these grand domestic plans require a lot of money. Which they often get from gutting the defense budget. Weakening our military (something they never liked to begin with) to free up money for buying votes (i.e., spending) elsewhere. They help justify this with a horrible foreign policy. Instead of peace through (costly) strength they choose a ‘please like us’ foreign policy. Marginalizing American Exceptionalism. Being kind to our enemies. And leaving our allies doubting our commitments. But if our enemies like us we won’t need a large military anymore. Allowing them to use those defense dollars elsewhere. And how has that been working out? Not good. Since the ‘please like us’ foreign policy juggernaut Egypt is in chaos. Syria is in a bitter civil war. Iran is developing a nuclear bomb. Israel is feeling abandoned. Al Qaeda is taking over Libya and Iraq. The Taliban will return to Afghanistan once the U.S. leaves. North Korea is test-firing ballistic missiles. And Vladimir Putin is restoring the Soviet Union. Because he can. Thanks to America’s new ‘please like us’ foreign policy. Instead of the peace through strength of previous presidents. Like Ronald Reagan. And JFK.
There’s something else children who never grow up do. Go into politics. Into the Democrat Party. Not the Republican Party. The party the Democrats derisively call the party of ‘no’. They join the Democrat Party. And do all of the things that give us the worst economic recovery since that following the Great Depression. And a more dangerous world. Despite this they still want to do more. Without caring what their actions may do to our future. Just like children. All they care about is the here and now. And instant gratification. So of course the Republicans are the party of ‘no’ because that’s what grownups say to children. ‘No’.
Tags: abortion, adults, birth control, children, conservative, cradle to grave, Democrat, Democrat Party, drinking, education, foreign policy, future, grownup, here and now, instant gratification, kids, liberal, liberal Democrat, life experience, marijuana, older and wiser, parent, party, party of no, peace through strength, please like us, Republicans, vote Democrat, work experience
Week in Review
You hear it all the time. Smoking marijuana is no worse than drinking alcohol. So we should decriminalize it everywhere. And allow responsible adults smoke marijuana if they choose. While at the same time they have banned smoking cigarettes just about everywhere outside of your own home. Because smoking will kill you. And anyone near you. Funny how smoking cigarettes will kill you and anyone near you while smoking marijuana is no worse than enjoying a refreshing adult beverage.
What’s even funnier is that as they continue to make statements like smoking marijuana is no worse than drinking alcohol they are ramping up a war on alcohol. As drinking alcohol is killing people at record numbers (see Raising the price of booze saves lives and money. Scotland is right to try it posted 12/21/2013 on The Economist).
AMONG man’s earliest artefacts are vessels to store and carry booze. Drunk from Stone Age jugs or Etruscan amphoras, fermented sugars have brought cheer for more than 12,000 years. And headaches too: alcohol stokes rage and gloom as well as jollity and dancing. For liberal-minded types, the downsides are a personal matter—we should be free to frolic.
Within limits. Where the harm extends beyond the individual, there is a case for intervention. Global alcohol consumption is stable. But some people are tippling more, in ways that hurt themselves and others (see article).
At stake are not just vomit-drenched streets. Deaths linked to drinking have tripled since 1990; in that time alcohol has gone from the sixth to the third leading cause of death and disability worldwide. The bill lands on everyone, as does booze-fuelled violence. Including lost output, the harm from alcohol costs Europe and America around 1.5% of national income.
The problem is worsening. Across the rich world, a small share of the population consumes a large share of the liquor. One reason is that many young people have upped their intake. More drinkers are also bingeing—even in southern Europe, where alcohol used to be taken mainly with food…
The best way to tackle excessive drinking is to raise prices through taxes levied on a drink’s strength, so that the most harmful drinks are more expensive. The resulting price-rise should cut the consumption of hard-up heavy topers (who are particularly partial to dirt-cheap supermarket booze) and young drinkers, who can afford only what’s cheap…
Public-health laws often require an unpopular move at the start, but new habits and attitudes can take root surprisingly quickly. A ban on smoking in restaurants and pubs seemed outlandish—until New York City introduced one in 2003. Much of the world quickly followed suit. Even diehard liberals like this newspaper, queasy at first about smoking bans, or mandatory crash helmets and seat belts, would hesitate to scrap those regulations now.
We are drinking ourselves to death three times as much as we were in the 1990s. And one reason why is that young people are drinking more. In fact many of the binge drinkers are young people. It is less uncommon to read about a binge-drinking related death on a college campus. It’s not happening all of the time but there are deaths. And sexual assaults.
Getting a woman drunk has long been a prelude to sex. That’s what singles’ bars were for. Drinking to lower a woman’s inhibitions. To get her to go home with a strange man for consensual sex. But at a party on a college campus? There’s no need to go home. For there is always a bedroom or a couch or a floor available in a fraternity house, apartment or dorm room. And young men with raging hormones in a sexualized culture will take advantage of a passed out college coed. Even doing terrible things to her as she lay unconscious. Or getting a video of her while she’s still conscious doing things she’d never do sober. And posting it online. Causing great pain and suffering for the girl.
Smoking marijuana will be no different than people enjoying alcohol. So we should decriminalize it. For what bad thing ever happened from enjoying alcohol?
Marijuana is a young person’s intoxicant. We’ve all seen the stoner movies where high school teachers have to deal with stoners. Like Jeff Spicoli in Fast Times at Ridgemont High. And this was when the drug was illegal everywhere in the United States. Imagine the Jeff Spicolis when the drug is decriminalized everywhere. While being more potent than ever. If new habits and new attitudes can take root surprisingly quickly then existing habits and attitudes and law should be just as easy to remain rooted. Especially for marijuana. For it combines the reckless abandon of youths to over consume like alcohol. And the harmful effects of smoking cigarettes.
Would the left sacrifice our young just to get their vote? Yes. Of course they will. And are. For do you really think they care if these people die after they grow up and begin acting—and voting—responsibly?
Tags: alcohol, binge, binge drinking, cigarettes, drinking, drug, marijuana, smoking, young people
Week in Review
It is rather ironic that the sexual revolution coincided with the women’s movement. Women liberated themselves by being more sexually active. Which is why men loved the women’s movement. Because they got more of what they wanted. More sex with more different women.
This focus on women’s sexuality did more to sexualize women than any man did. What did birth control and abortion do for women? It gave them the freedom not to get pregnant when having sex. So they had more sex. Turning them into sexual objects. Because men didn’t have to marry them to have sex with them. Which was just fine with them.
It is interesting that women have defined their liberation by living more destructive lives. Their sexual revolution led to an explosion in STDs. As women became more liberated more women smoked. In fact a popular ad for Virginia Slims was, “You’ve come a long way, baby.” Showing a modern, beautiful, sexy women smoking a cigarette. About as unlike June Cleaver as you can get. And what liberated woman doesn’t drink(see Female alcohol abuse is a ‘global epidemic’ by Ann Dowsett Johnson posted 10/5/2013 on the New York Post)?
Alcohol abuse is rising in much of the developed world — and in many countries, female drinkers are driving that growth…
Women with a university degree are almost twice as likely to drink daily as those without. “I ask myself every day if I’m an alcoholic,” says one rising corporate star. “I’m 32, and I drink every night. All my friends drink every night. We haven’t had our kids yet, and we all drink the same way we did in university.”
Says Katherine Brown, director of policy at Britain’s Institute of Alcohol Studies: “Young professional women drink a lot more than women in manual and routine jobs — what you call blue collar. Is it marketing, keeping up with the machismo, children..?”
Brown believes that a crucial driver is the norms of the university years. “It’s an alcohol-soaked environment,” she says. “At the university I went to — Exeter — Carlsberg was a sponsor of events held on campus. The focus was on getting really, really drunk and the most horrendous things used to happen. All social events revolved around drinking, and acting the fool was celebrated…
“It is the issue affecting girls’ health — and it’s going sideways, especially for those 13 to 15.” This is the voice of Nancy Poole, director of research and knowledge translation at the British Columbia Centre of Excellence for Women’s Health. “And the saddest thing,” says Poole, “is alcohol is being marketed as girls’ liberation.”
Drinking calms us. And lowers our inhibitions. We drink at a party to get the courage to talk to that person we’re attracted to. New strippers drink a lot so they can strip down to a tiny thong and gyrate on a man’s lap. In fact, drinking has been used for years as the prelude for sexual pleasures. Which is why men buy women drinks. To get them drunk enough so they lose their inhibitions and have sex with them. Which is probably why 13-15 year old boys are finding ways to get alcohol so they can binge drink at parties. And get girls so drunk that they can have sex when they are not of right mind to say ‘no’. Because nothing puts a damper on having sex more than a girl saying ‘no’.
Of course, these boys get an assist from government. Thanks to that free birth control available at school. And abortions without parental notification. Which gives them the argument that there is nothing to worry about. Even if there is something to worry about. Because there’s a way to make problems go away.
When they get to university they take it up a notch. Because there are no parents around looking out for their best interests. So they binge drink. Act stupid. And do horrendous things. The kind of things you want to start drinking to forget about when you wake up the following morning. Unless someone uploads a video of you in the throes of that horrendous thing. Or you brought home a souvenir that will require medication for the indefinite future. Or longer.
Liberated woman, you have come a long way. Baby.
Tags: abortion, alcohol abuse, binge drink, birth control, drinking, female drinkers, inhibitions, liberated women, liberation, sexual revolution, University, women's movement, You've come a long way baby
Week in Review
According to Democrats, Republicans are at war with women. Because they hate women. For they want to restrict abortion. And they want women to pay for their birth control. Republicans also want women to marry and raise a family instead of just pursuing a career. The kind of thinking they had in the Middle Ages. And the Republicans are always talking about God and religion. Trying to shame women from enjoying their sexual side. Preferring their women barefoot and pregnant. Not out having a good time. Drinking and smoking pot as they please. And going home with anyone they please to enjoy sexually. This is what being a modern woman is all about. The freedom to do whatever the hell they want without any moral judgment. Just like a man can. Women have made progress. But they have a long way to go (see Why female potheads still feel ashamed by Hayley Krischer posted 9/14/2013 on Salon).
Here’s the thing about women and weed: Women generally don’t want to discuss their habit out of fear of being judged or compared to a cartoon. Think Milla Jovovich’s stoner character in “Dazed and Confused” — she had no lines whatsoever and merely stared off into space, and, okay, she painted a Gene Simmons face on that statue. Worse, if you’re a mother, you keep your weed habit secret because you don’t want to be seen as a negligent parent…
Though movies have portrayed men getting high in groups for decades (just this summer Seth Rogen and co. smoked their way through the apocalypse in “This Is The End”), there’s a complete lack of women who smoke weed in pop culture, as Ann Friedman points out in New York magazine: “There are a few depictions of women smoking at home as a way to blow off some steam and bond with each other…
This is exactly why a 43-year-old friend of mine, and a mom of two young boys, won’t discuss her weed smoking with other women. “I don’t want to be judged,” she says. “I think in general women are supposed to be more responsible and something about it is irresponsible…”
Perhaps, eventually, the broader acceptance of smoking weed will spread to women. Two recent examples: Lady Gaga and Rihanna both dressed up as bedazzled cannabis queens last year for Halloween. (Rihanna dressed as a weed bride with a bouquet of bud. Lady Gaga covered her nipples with sativa leaf nipple pasties.) And there’s an opportunity for women to create their own statement about marijuana in the future without feeling so, ahem, paranoid. I saw some hope after a conversation with my 21-year-old cousin, a senior at Oberlin, who says most of her girlfriends freely smoke weed. “People think it’s cool if girls smoke weed.” And then as an afterthought she added, “It might also be because of my environment.”
For the most part smoking weed is illegal. So it is irresponsible. Especially if you have children. As parents don’t want their children to see them breaking the law. For if breaking the law is okay then it must be okay not to listen to your parents, too. “Do your homework, clean your room, don’t drink until you’re of legal age,” says a kid’s parent. “But you smoke pot and that’s illegal,” says the kid. “Damn,” says the parent. “Then I guess it’s okay if you break the law and drink.”
No doubt a lot of mothers want to hide their weed habit from their kids to avoid exchanges like this. Which will be easier to do if they hide it from everyone. If she smokes with another mother this other mother could talk to her husband about her getting stoned with her friend which can be overheard by this other mother’s kid. That kid tells his friends who then tell their friends and the next thing you know they kick this stoner mother off the PTA. So it’s still an uphill battle for women to get high. But at least they are making progress elsewhere. Closing the gap between men and women. Something that should make Democrats happy (see Number of female DUIs soaring across the country, statistics show by Emily Alpert posted 9/12/2013 on the Los Angeles Times).
Women make up a bigger share of arrests for driving under the influence than they did decades ago, but little attention has been paid to how to halt or handle the trend, according to a report released Thursday.
Federal statistics showed that women constituted nearly a quarter of DUI arrests across the United States in recent years. In 1980, the number was just 9.3%, but the percentage has risen almost every year for three decades, according to data from the Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Yet most research on drunk driving focuses on men…
The Canadian group found some common threads among the female offenders: Almost all said they faced a stressful event such as a breakup or death in the family before their arrest. More than three-quarters said they used at least one prescription medication for anxiety, depression and other disorders. And more than half were single, separated or divorced.
The report also found that the women fit into three categories: young women who drink to “fit in” at house parties or bars; recently married women who drink to cope with loneliness after their children are born; and divorced older women or empty-nesters who begin to drink later in life.
When women married and raised families they were drinking and driving less. Because they were happier. For over half of the women with a DUI were single, separated or divorced. That is, they were not married and raising a family. They were not happy. And because they were not happy they drank more.
So who, then, is fighting this war on women? Those who are doing everything to make it easier to drink, get high and have sex? That leads to more unhappiness and more drinking? As well as an explosion in sexually transmitted diseases? Or those who champion marriage and family? That leads to more happiness and less drinking? And fewer sexually transmitted diseases?
You probably should ask mothers what they want for their daughters.
Tags: breaking the law, children, daughter, Democrats, drinking, driving under the influence, drunk driving, DUI, family, getting high, irresponsible, judged, marijuana, mother, parent, pot, Republicans, responsible, smoke weed, smoking pot, stoner, stoner mother, weed, women
Prohibition Violence spilled onto the Streets where Gangsters shot up each other with Thompson Submachine Guns
Men have always drunk in this country. A lot. After the working day was over they went to their corner saloon. And drank away their pay. Getting inebriated. And making a lot of bad decisions. Such as drinking away their pay. Getting into fights. Engaging the services of prostitutes hanging out at the saloons. Catching a venereal disease or two. Taking them home to the wife. Worse, some of these drunken men were beating their wives.
Alcohol violence was taking a toll on the American family. In particular on the women in those American families. This alcohol violence was creating a war on women. These drunken men were beating their wives. And inflicting them with venereal diseases. Causing great harm to their wives. And destroying their families. They needed to do something. And that something led to the temperance movement. Which ended in Prohibition. An outright ban on alcoholic beverages.
And it worked. Alcohol violence on women committed by their husbands decreased. As did the rate of venereal disease infections on married women. As Prohibition shut down the local saloons. And all the problems they caused. But it didn’t stop everyone from drinking. There was such a large demand despite Prohibition that others stepped in to meet that demand. Organized crime. Prohibition violence spilled onto the streets where gangsters shot up each other, and innocent bystanders, with Thompson submachine guns. As the profitability of the illicit alcohol trade erupted in violent gang wars. Allowing crime bosses like Al Capone to take over cities. And corrupting their police forces. Causing even more trouble than the original alcohol violence on married women. So they repealed Prohibition. And the people could drink once again. As they always wanted to.
The Illicit Drug Trade picked up where Prohibition left off in terms of Gun Violence
The British were addicted to Chinese tea. They couldn’t get enough of it. Or other Chinese luxuries like silk and porcelain. The only problem was that the Chinese didn’t want anything from Britain. So as the Chinese goods flowed to Britain silver flowed from Britain to China to pay for their goods. Causing a huge trade imbalance. Which the British corrected with the opium grown in India. And being that opium was addictive more and more Chinese were using opium. Which reversed the net silver flow. Allowing the British to enjoy their tea, silk and porcelain. Which they traded Indian opium for. Causing an addiction problem in China. And a destruction of Chinese society. That the Chinese responded to with the Opium Wars.
Drug addiction has destroyed many families. And societies. Throughout the world. Which is why hard drugs like heroin and cocaine are illegal in most countries. For they are very addictive. Drug addicts lose their jobs. Their wives. Girlfriends. And families. As they sink into addiction without a job they often turn to crime to pay for their habit. Become thieves. Or prostitutes. Where they often suffer abuse. End up in jail. Or catch AIDS from sharing needles with other intravenous drug users. Cocaine use spread in more affluent circles. While crack cocaine devastated poorer circles. Which is why most of the world has criminalized these drugs. Despite this demand remains high. Cocaine use has fallen in the West. But only because some users have switched to methamphetamine. Which is cheaper. More powerful. And longer lasting.
Like with alcohol someone stepped in to meet this demand. Organized crime. And boy did they unleash drug violence onto the world. From the street gangs shooting each other (and innocent bystanders) to control turf. To the cartels higher up the distribution channels. The illicit drug trade is big money. Very big money. Picking up where prohibition left off. For it is the criminal element that truly benefits from banning anything. The drug trade is so lucrative that it is now even funding al Qaeda. Even though Islam strictly forbids the use of drugs. But they have no problem taking a percent of the drug trade that flows from South America through Africa on its way to Europe. Where it can destroy European societies. Something al Qaeda has no problem with.
People already Breaking the Law will not be Stopped by another New Law
There is an epidemic of gun violence in the U.S. Committed not by people who support and defend their Second Amendment right to own a gun. For wanting to do that is not helped by shooting lots of innocent people. In fact if one is prone to conspiracy theories one could say that the rise in gun violence is oddly coincidental to the Obama administration’s pursuit of gun control regulation. Especially following Fast and Furious. A program used by the Obama administration to try and stir up anti-gun sentiment. Like that the current epidemic of gun violence is stirring up. Which the conspiracy theorist could find a little too coincidental. But I digress.
The people committing these acts of gun violence are some pretty disturbed people. They have mental health issues. Or are extremely angry about something. Perhaps because they can’t get a job in the worst economic recovery in U.S. history. Thanks to President Obama’s economic policies designed more for politics and social justice than actual job creation. Who knows? The only thing for certain is that this rise in gun violence corresponds with President Obama’s time in office. For he didn’t campaign on the need for new gun control legislation. But like his position on gay marriage he evolved to this position. After witnessing a rise in gun violence during his time in office.
Whatever the cause is will new gun control legislation change anything? Well, if we can learn anything from Prohibition and the War on Drugs, yes. It will change things. It will give organized crime another lucrative illicit trade. But unlike alcohol and drugs their customers will not be people just trying to get a drink or a high. It will be hardened criminals. Who are shooting each other on the streets to defend their turf. And at all levels of the illicit drug trade going right up to the cartels at the top. So the criminals will have their guns. And there will be new gang wars as criminal elements fight each other to control the gun trade. Which may even increase the gun violence in places like Chicago. Which is already one of the deadliest U.S. cities. Despite having some of the most restrictive gun control laws in the nation.
So why do they have more gun deaths in Chicago than most cities? Because there is a high demand for guns by the criminal element in Chicago. Will a federal ban change that? Will it put an end to gun violence? Did it stop alcohol violence during Prohibition? Does it stop drug violence now? No. A gun ban will not change what’s happening in Chicago. For guns aren’t causing the gun deaths in Chicago. It’s the people using the guns. And people already breaking the law will not be stopped by another new law.
Tags: addiction, alcohol trade, alcohol violence, Britain, China, cocaine, drinking, drug addiction, drug trade, drug violence, family, gang wars, gun, gun control, gun trade, gun violence, heroin, illicit drug trade, India, opium, organized crime, porcelain, Prohibition, prostitutes, saloon, silk, silver, tea, Thompson Submachine Gun, venereal disease, wives, women
Week in Review
Potheads want to decriminalize marijuana because they like getting high. Especially high school kids and college kids. Who aren’t known for making responsible decisions. Binge drinking, drunk driving, smoking cigarettes, stealing prescription drugs from their parents, unplanned pregnancies, sexually transmitted diseases, etc. Things that just don’t happen much to married men and women raising a family in the suburbs. Who actually grew up and became responsible adults.
But it’s just not the kids getting high. There are a lot of ‘responsible’ adults who want to decriminalize marijuana, too. Most of who spent their high school and college years stoned. But they make a more responsible argument for the decriminalization of marijuana. For it would end all of our budget woes if the government regulated and TAXED marijuana. Equating getting high with responsible governing. And if there is one thing we know whenever the government regulates and taxes something it encourages people to buy more of that something, flooding government treasuries with cash (see Alcohol duty fraud: Action needed, say off-licences by Emma Forde posted 12/22/2012 on BBC News Business).
UK tax authorities are not doing enough to tackle alcohol duty fraud, claims a leading off-licence chain.
Bargain Booze told the BBC that the number of stores telling HM Revenue and Customs that they face illegal competition is rising…
Alcohol duty fraud in the UK often involves exporting alcohol to the EU – untaxed – and then bringing it back into the UK with false paperwork.
This method exploits EU rules which state duty does not have to be paid on alcohol when it is being transferred between registered producers or wholesalers – it is only paid when it enters the marketplace.
But the BBC’s 5 live Investigates programme has learned that some lorries containing duty-unpaid alcohol meant for export never even leave the UK…
The illicit alcohol ends up in the hands of rogue wholesalers and retailers who then sell it on at prices which legitimate traders say are only possible if duty has been evaded…
Representatives from the alcohol retail industry claim the total cost to the Exchequer could be billions of pounds: “HMRC view the loss of revenue to the Exchequer at £1.2bn, but that excludes wine. Within the trade, the real cost to the Exchequer is viewed as something in excess of £4bn a year,” says Keith Webb…
The cash-and-carry owner, who did not want to be named due to fear of reprisal from criminal gangs, says it would have to pay around £19.35 for a box of six bottles of Echo Falls Chardonnay – of that, £11.40 would be duty.
The same amount and brand of lager would cost £16.56, with duty at £9.36 per case.
You just can’t add a 57-59% excise tax on something and expect the criminal element not to take advantage of that. That’s just too juicy a profit to pass up. And an easy and safe profit to make. For they don’t have to traffic in an illegal substance. They’re just doing the tax evasion part of illegal drug trafficking. Making it a far less risky crime. So why wouldn’t they exploit the government’s regulating and taxing of alcohol? This is a gift handed to them on a silver platter. And the same thing would happen with marijuana.
There is a problem with sin taxes. The purpose of a sin tax is to dissuade people from participating in an unhealthy behavior. Such as drinking and smoking. So as they raise these taxes people buy less of these things. Meeting the goal of a sin tax. But if you use that same sin tax for revenue purposes you have a problem. For the more you dissuade that behavior (i.e., the more you raise the tax rate) the less people will participate (i.e., the less tax revenue they collect). The two (dissuading behavior and raising tax revenue) are mutually exclusive. You can dissuade unhealthy behavior. Or you can raise revenue. But you can’t do both. Which is why we have sin taxes and not outright prohibitions on these behaviors.
Governments are less interested in their stated purpose (dissuading unhealthy behavior) than they are in raising revenue. For they are desperate to find new sources of revenue to pay for their irresponsible spending ways. Which is why alcohol and tobacco products in the U.S. have very high excise taxes. As well as laws setting minimum prices. They say these are to protect the consumer from predatory pricing. Something few consumers ever complain about. Low prices are good. The lower the better. The only people hurt by predatory pricing are businesses that can’t compete at those lose prices. And governments trying to collect confiscatory excise taxes on sinful behavior. To avoid the problems they’re having in the UK with their alcohol duty fraud.
Governments don’t want criminals profiting off these high excise taxes by selling alcohol to consumers at lower prices. They want the consumers to pay higher prices so they can give more of their income to the government. To help pay for their irresponsible spending. Which they never consider cutting to solve their budget problems. They only consider new sources of revenue. Or raising tax rates. Which will happen with marijuana. Opening the door for less risky profit taking for the criminal element the more they decriminalize it. And the more they tax it.
Tags: alcohol, alcohol duty fraud, decriminalize marijuana, drinking, duty fraud, EU, excise tax, irresponsible spending, marijuana, minimum prices, predatory pricing, profit, revenue, sin tax, sin taxes, smoking, tax revenue, UK, unhealthy behavior
Week in Review
Here are two sad stories in one. Another senseless death due to stupid behavior of our young. And how the NHS let this kid die from his stupid behavior (see Student, 18, ‘downed a bottle of rum in 15 MINUTES for a bet before falling to his death down a flight of stairs’ by Emily Andrews and Ben Spencer posted 10/11/2012 on the Daily Mail).
Timothy Jarvis, 18, was in the first week of his maths degree when he downed an entire bottle of rum in 15 minutes for a bet.
The former grammar school boy then suffered fatal head injuries after tumbling down a flight of stairs at his university’s hall of residence.
Despite being taken to hospital, it was 90 minutes before he was assessed by a doctor and he died the next day.
How many of us did something as stupid as this in our youth? Only we were lucky enough not to have killed ourselves? And I stress the word ‘lucky’. Binge drinking. This is poor decision making. Poor understanding of the consequences of our actions. And a poor understanding of what’s important in life. This student had a promising future. He was not in university taking the easy courses just to party. He was taking one of the hard degrees. Who knows what he would have contributed to make the world a better place. What a senseless waste.
As a side note, these are the people that often swing elections. The youth vote. Who have a propensity for poor decision making. That’s why in most of the United States we don’t let these kids drink until after they turn 21. Put severe limits on them when they start driving. And charge them the highest car insurance rates. Because of their consistent poor decision making. Yet when they walk into the voting booth the Left would have us believe that they are the wisest and the most responsible people in the world. Because they vote for the party of birth control and abortion. And the party that is more inclined to decriminalize marijuana. Everything a growing young person wants to make life as fun as possible. While discarding the possible consequences of their actions. But doing things their parents warn them not to do often comes with consequences. While their votes often saddle the nation with the consequences of their foolish actions inside the voting booth. For the majority of people have issues that are more important to them than birth control, abortion and marijuana.
When paramedics arrived and found Mr Jarvis unconscious, they made a ‘red alert’ call to Colchester Hospital to warn them to expect a serious case.
But when they arrived at 12.35am, there was no trauma team to meet them, Mr Jarvis was left on a trolley in a corridor and was not assessed by a doctor for nearly 90 minutes.
NHS guidelines say every patient should be examined by a nurse within 15 minutes and by a doctor within an hour.
Imagine that. A hospital with an emergency department without a trauma team standing ready. If you’re wondering what the future of Obamacare is here it is. Cost cutting, long wait times and service rationing that leaves an emergency department at a hospital without a trauma team at the ready. And who helped pass Obamacare into law? That’s right. The youth vote. Who voted for Barack Obama in droves. Yet another example of poor decision making. That the rest of us will have to live with the consequences of their actions.
If we have age restrictions on drinking because the young are just not mature enough to drink at such a young age perhaps we should have an age restriction on voting. Letting young people vote only after they are mature enough to understand how to drink responsibly. Unless they’re serving in the military. Which should be the only exception due to their service to the country. And the incredible amount of discipline they acquire through their military training.
Tags: abortion, binge drinking, birth control, consequences, drinking, elections, emergency department, hospital, marijuana, NHS, not mature enough, Obamacare, poor decision making, stupid behavior, trauma team, voting booth, youth vote
Week in Review
The Democrats go after the youth vote. In fact they would lower the voting age if they could. The lower the better. Because young people make so many bad decisions. Which is why the Democrats can count on their vote (see One-third of U.S. teens report texting while driving: CDC by David Beasley posted 6/7/2012 on Reuters).
One in three high school students reported they had texted or emailed while driving during the previous 30 days, according to the centers’ 2011 youth risk behavior survey of 15,000 high school students…
In 2010, auto accidents killed 3,115 teens aged 13-19, the CDC said. That was down 44 percent over the past decade, but auto accidents remain the leading cause of teen deaths…
The risk behavior survey found that while cigarette smoking dropped slightly from 2009-2011, more teens smoked marijuana, with 23.1 percent of students saying they had used it one or more times during the previous 30 days. For the first time since the CDC began taking the survey in 1991, more teens said they smoked marijuana than cigarettes.
Nearly 40 percent of students said they had at least one alcoholic drink in the previous 30 days.
High school students are typically not older than 18. And the legal drinking age is 21 in most places these days. So these 40% are not great fans of the law. The legal age to buy and smoke tobacco products in most states is 18. So those smoking cigarettes are likely underage, too. (Unless they were held back a few years in school.) So those smoking cigarettes are also not great fans of the law.
More kids are smoking marijuana than cigarettes. As marijuana is illegal this is yet another law these kids are breaking. So these smoking and drinking kids are habitually breaking the law. And every time they do so it is a bad decision. Especially if they operate a motor vehicle afterward. And being that auto deaths are still the leading cause of death for teenagers it is a good chance they’re doing these things while driving. As well as texting while driving.
A lot of teenagers have a problem with authority. And when they get a chance to vote they tend to vote against authority. For someone who isn’t their parent. So their bad behavior extends to the voting booth. Where they don’t vote for what is best for their country. But best for them in the moment. More lenient drug laws. Free birth control. Access to abortion. Things that are important in their young lives. And that can facilitate more bad decision making.
That’s why Democrat candidates appear on shows that cater to these teenagers. To show how unlike their parents they are. Knowing these kids aren’t interested in monetary or fiscal policy. Or responsible governing. They just want to laugh at conservatives. Party. And vote for the cool people. That are more like them than their parents. So they go on the cool shows. And shamelessly pander to these kids. To get their votes. And destroy their future with their policies. But by the time these kids catch on to their game and start changing their vote there are more young people coming of age to take their place. And the pandering continues. Wooing the young vote before the young are young no more. And they start making good decisions.
Tags: authority, bad decisions, cigarettes, Democrat, drinking, driving, high school students, marijuana, parent, smoking, texting, texting while driving, young people