King Louis XIV remained Catholic as Protestantism was Breaking Out in Europe and Britain
It’s been awhile since the last ice age. In fact the last time we had a real ice age predated the first civilizations. We still wore animal skins and hunted and gathered our food. Long before we first farmed. But it would get cool again. Shortly after the Black Death (during the 1300s) it did get unseasonably cool. So cool that we now call it the Little Ice Age (from 1350 to 1850 or thereabouts). The glaciers didn’t cover Europe. But it was cold. And wet. The spring took forever to change into summer. While summer was quick to turn into fall. Which led to short growing seasons. Poor harvests. Hunger. And famine.
Martin Luther was no fan of the Pope. Especially because of the indulgences he was selling. A shortcut to heaven. For those with money. Which is what the Pope wanted. Money. For he was doing some costly renovations in Rome. So in 1517 Martin Luther nailed up his Ninety-Five Theses to the church door demanding reform. And kicking off the Protestant Reformation. Well, the Catholic Church wasn’t interested in reform. So Luther set up a new church. With a new religion. Protestantism. A more plain religion. With masses in the common language of the people. Instead of Latin. And no fancy things in the church. No altars. No stain glass. No icons. Just the word of God. With over a thousand years of Catholicism already under their belt, though, a lot of people took offense to this. And their offense offended the new Protestants. So they went to war with each other for a few centuries or so over their religious differences.
King Louis XIV was one of the great French monarchs. Under his rule France was the dominant European power. The Sun King believed in the divine right of kings. Absolute monarchism. Doing pretty much as he pleased. Which included a few wars. And growing an empire with oversea colonies. It cost a pretty penny. And a lot of lives. Louis remained Catholic as Protestantism was breaking out in Europe. And in England. For a couple hundred years or so England and France were bitter enemies. Contesting colonial lands throughout the globe. And defending the true faith. Catholicism. Or Protestantism. The Catholic-Protestant battle lines stretched across Europe. And to distant lands across the globe. Including the New World. Where they would both spend fortunes in waging war.
For the French the American War of Independence had nothing to do with the Americans
The Enlightenment, or the Age of Reason, gave the French Voltaire. One of the great Enlightenment philosophers. When Benjamin Franklin was in France the French were eager to bring two of the world’s greatest Enlightenment philosophers together. And did. The French also gave us the great Charles-Louis de Secondat, baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu. The greatest influence on the Founding Fathers as they drafted our Constitution. So there was some great thinking percolating in France. Thoughts that focused on science and reason. Not tradition and faith. Even questioning some long-held beliefs about the Catholic Church, the aristocracy and the absolute monarchy.
Louis XIV built a great French empire. The French seemed invincible. Until Louis XV took over. Who lost the Seven Years’ War to the British. And saw French North America become British. (And the Louisiana Territory go to Spain.) That was tough having their eternal foe humiliate them. The Protestant British. It was a blow to French pride. French commerce. And French finances. The near-perpetual state of war that had existed between Britain and France had cost both nations a lot of money. The British decided to recoup some of that money by taxing their American colonies. Which didn’t go over well with the Americans. For unlike France the British had a constitutional monarchy. Where the Parliament restricted the king’s powers. That great institute of the people. Which the Americans had no representation in. Leading to their rebellion. Because they didn’t like being treated like second-class subjects of the British Empire. Which brought about the American Revolutionary War.
After the Americans defeated a British army at the Battle of Saratoga the French joined the Americans in their fight for independence from the oppression of a constitutional monarchy. Which seemed rather odd being that the French at this time was still an absolute monarchy (though now ruled by Louis XVI). Which was far more oppressive than the constitutional variety. But for the French the American War of Independence had nothing to do with the Americans. It had to do with French interests. It was a chance to strike back at their eternal enemy. The Protestant British. And more importantly, when they won they could get back all their colonies they lost in the Seven Years’ War.
The French were Intoxicated with all of those Enlightenment Ideals and the American Win over an Oppressive Monarchy
The Americans won their independence. But the French didn’t get anything they wanted. All they got was a lot of debt. To add to the enormous pile of debt they already had. One of the French conditions for their alliance was that the Americans would not make a separate peace with the British. Which is what the Americans did. Why? Because the French and the Spanish were conspiring against the Americans during the peace talks. So they could expand their holdings in North America at the expense of the British and the Americans. The French were even willing to trade American Independence away. The British, who would rather have Americans on their former lands than the French or Spanish, made a separate peace with the Americans.
This act of diplomacy stunned the French. For they had assurances from the American Congress that they would take the lead in the peace talks. The Americans double-crossed them before they could double-cross the Americans. This wasn’t supposed to happen in the world of European diplomacy. Especially with rubes like the Americans. But it did. And the French were now in a world of hurt. Broke. And facing bankruptcy. Desperately needing new tax revenue King Louis XVI called an Assembly of Notables. The nobility and clergy. But they didn’t want to pay any more taxes. So the king called the Estates-General of 1789. Which included the clergy, the nobility and everyone else (i.e., the Third Estate).
Meanwhile there was widespread hunger and malnutrition. Poor grain harvests (in part due to the Little Ice Age) pushed the price of bread out of reach for many. People were cold, hungry and poor. In the Third Estate, that is. For though they may have been suffering they saw that the nobility and the Catholic clergy were not. In fact, they were living rather well. Which inflamed the masses. Who became intoxicated with all of those Enlightenment ideals. And that American victory over an oppressive monarchy. It got the people thinking. That they didn’t need a nobility any more. The Catholic Church. Or a king. And the people would get rid of these things. For awhile, at least. With something called the French Revolution.
Tags: absolute monarchism, American Revolution, Britain, British, Catholic, Catholic Church, Catholicism, clergy, constitutional monarchy, England, Enlightenment philosophers, famine, France, French, French Revolution, hunger, king, King Louis XIV, little ice age, Louis XIV, Martin Luther, nobility, Parliament, poor harvests, Pope, Protestant Reformation, Protestantism, Religion, Seven Years War, Spanish, Sun King, Third Estate
Magna Carta led to Constitutional Monarchy and Representative Government
Medieval kings liked doing as they pleased. From living well. To expanding their kingdoms by force. Or trying to. As kingdoms got larger, though, this was more difficult to do. Because the larger the kingdom got the more food they had to produce. And kings didn’t feed their kingdoms from their castle vegetable gardens. They needed the wealthy and powerful landowners. Who owned the land. Grew the food. And provided the kingdom’s wealth.
These landowners made land valuable. By growing food on it. As famine was no stranger during the Middle Ages there was nothing more important than growing food. Those who did became wealthy. And their estates became mini kingdoms. With lots of peasants working the fields. And lots of soldiers to defend their land. And to fight for their king in times of war. Kings needed to maintain good relationships with these wealthy landowners. To keep them supporting their kingdoms. And to prevent any one of them from rising up and challenging the king for his throne.
King John of England was hurting his relationships with the wealthy landowners. He fought a lot of expensive wars across the English Channel in France. Which required high taxes on the English landowners. The barons. Worse, King John lost a lot of his battles in France. Losing the barons some of their Normandy lands. So the barons were becoming a little disgruntled with their king. And they rebelled. Eventually forcing the king to place his Great Seal on Magna Carta. Limiting his powers. It didn’t change things much at the time. But it would lead to constitutional monarchy. And representative government.
The Patriots of 1776 were none too keen on Creating a New Central Power
Kings don’t like limits on their power. King John would go on to renounce Magna Carta. And got the Pope’s approval to not honor the promises he made with the barons. But these barons sowed the seeds of representative government in England. And the Western World. Greatly influencing the Founding Fathers in America. Whose Constitution placed great limits on the government’s power.
The Americans were having some problems with their Articles of Confederation. The sovereign states were taking care of themselves. Sometimes at the expense of the other states. Or the new nation. And the new nation wasn’t making much progress in the international community. A bit of a laughing stock to other nations. Who were all sure it was only a matter of time before the American colonies would be British again. For once the war was over there was little united about the states anymore. So James Madison urged a meeting of the several states to revise the Articles of Confederation. To help make a more perfect union. And to move the new nation forward. They met in Philadelphia in 1787. And caused a firestorm. For they didn’t revise the Articles. They threw them away. And wrote a brand new Constitution.
This inflamed a lot of the Patriots of 1776. Who had voted to sever the bonds from a distant central power about a decade earlier. And they were none too keen on creating a new central power to replace the one they just banished. It took awhile but with the presence of George Washington and some words from Benjamin Franklin, two of the most trusted and experienced Americans who sacrificed a lot in securing their independence, they completed their task. It wasn’t a perfect document. But it was the best they were ever going to produce considering the sectional differences in the country. And they sent it to the states for ratification. James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and John Jay helped to secure ratification by writing a series of articles that we know today as the Federalist Papers. Some of the finest Constitutional scholarship ever written.
As Few as Five People in Black Robes can Fundamentally Change the Nation
Key to the Constitution was the separation of powers that restricted the power of the new federal government that no one trusted. There was a legislature to write law. An executive branch to enforce law. And a judicial branch to interpret law. To make sure that the other two branches did not violate the Constitution. Such a system would have really crimped King John’s style. For the law was above all the people. Including the executive. He could only do the things the laws allowed him to do. And the things the laws allowed him to do he could only do if the legislature agreed to pay for them. It was a system of checks and balances that helped the nation to grow while maintaining personal liberty.
King John would have been particularly irked by the legislature. Made up by representatives of the people. Who enacted legislation that was in the best interest of the people. Not him. Fast forward to modern times and you find history littered with people who wanted to expand their power only to have that representative body of the people foil them. Ruling elites. Modern aristocrats. Those who feel an entitlement due to a superior education. A superior bloodline. Or simply like-minded people who would rather have the days of unlimited power like they had in Medieval Europe. Before the barons had to muck up the works with Magna Carta.
Over time they learned how to bring back some of the old ways. The easiest way was just to get people to vote for them. And they did this by giving them a lot of free stuff. But there were some things that they just couldn’t bribe out of the people. So they turned to the courts. And did a little legislating with activist judges. Sometimes bringing a suit all the way to the Supreme Court to create a law where there was no law. Abortion is now legal even though there was never any federal legislation addressing it. While there was plenty of state legislation forbidding it. Until seven men in black robes overruled the will of the people in those states.
The Supreme Court is powerful. For as few as five people in black robes can fundamentally change the nation. Which is why presidential elections are so important. Because presidents nominate judges to the Supreme Court. And those on the Left depend on the timely deaths and/or retirements of Supreme Court judges so they can nominate activist judges. To get a majority on the high court to rule in their favor on bad law. Such as Obamacare. An unpopular law. A law the majority of the people want repealed. A law that became law only with subterfuge (the mandate is not a tax). A law that clearly violated the Constitution (forcing people to buy something). Yet five people in black robes just fundamentally changed the nation by voting that Obamacare was Constitutional (the mandate is a tax). Which just goes to show you that where there is a will there is a way. A way to rule like a king. Against the will of the people.
Tags: activist judges, Articles of Confederation, barons, black robes, central power, Constitution, constitutional monarchy, courts, distant central power, England, executive, judges, judicial, King John, kingdoms, kings, landowners, law, legislation, legislature, liberals, Madison, Magna Carta, mandate, medieval kings, Obamacare, Patriots of 1776, representative government, Supreme Court, Supreme Court judges, taxes, wealth, wealthy landowners, will of the people
In Response to the Declaration of Rights and Grievances George III condemned Massachusetts and the Suffolk Resolves
The Boston Tea Party (1773) and the subsequent passing of the Intolerable/Coercive Acts (1774) brought the several states together in Congress. John Adams, Samuel Adams, Joseph Galloway, Patrick Henry, Richard Henry Lee, George Washington and other delegates from every state (except Georgia) convened the Continental Congress in Philadelphia in September of 1774. It sat for two months. And began with a vote to endorse the Suffolk Resolves. The Suffolk Resolves opposed the British oppression entailed in the Intolerable/Coercive Acts. In Massachusetts. (Other colonies passed similar resolves.) The resolves included a boycott of British goods. Demanded the resignation of the Crown’s representatives that displaced the elected colonial government. They supported a new colonial government free from the Crown. Refused to pay any further taxes until this happened. And urged for the several states to raise militias. But they did not talk of independence. The Resolves even declared their loyalty to the British Crown. Still, after learning of this action King George III said, “The die is cast.”
Joseph Galloway introduced the Galloway Plan of Union. Calling for a federal union of the several states. Where the king would appoint a president general. Advised by a grand council. With a representative from each state. Chosen by each state’s legislative body. A system of self-government. But one still loyal to the Crown. A move that made the British colonies more independent of the British Crown. But not independent from the British Crown. The Americans were to remain British Americans. Subjects of the greatest country in the world. The present trouble in Boston notwithstanding. For Great Britain was the only constitutional monarchy at the time. And the bastion of individual liberty. Which the Americans were looking forward to enjoying once the present misunderstandings passed. After a lengthy debate, the Galloway Plan of Union failed to pass. But it wouldn’t be the last talk of union.
They then adopted a Declaration of Rights and Grievances. Full of a lot of language the English used years earlier to redress previous issues with the Crown. And some of the same words of the Enlightenment thinkers they used. From Thomas Hobbes they wrote of their ‘right to life’. From John Locke the ‘right to liberty and property’ and ‘ruling by the consent of those governed’. From Baron Charles de Montesquieu the ‘separation of powers’ that eventually found its way into our Constitution. They sent off their declarations and petitions to London. Adjourned Congress. Agreed to reconvene the following May if necessary. And waited for King George to reply. He gave it in Parliament in November. In a speech to Parliament. Where he condemned Massachusetts. And the Suffolk Resolves. Not the answer they were hoping for. No. Their king was not going to save the Americans from the hostile acts of Parliament. Instead he was going to present a unified British opposition (King and Parliament) against these British subjects. The once loyal British Americans were running out of reasons to remain loyal to the British Crown. All they needed was one more push.
Thomas Paine’s Common Sense provided the Final Push towards Independence
The following April the battles of Lexington and Concord took place. There was a shooting war, now. With the Americans following the British back to Boston and laying siege. The patriotic spirit was high. And such was the spirit when the Second Continental Congress convened in Philadelphia in May of 1775. Independence was in the air. John Adams wanted it. But kept quiet. They prepared for war. Choosing George Washington to lead them in war. But this was plan ‘B’. Plan ‘A’ was still reconciliation. And to remain British. Which is what many wanted. Even Washington wasn’t all that keen on independence. He detested the acts of Parliament. But he and his officers were still toasting the health of the King at this time.
John Dickinson led the reconciliation group in Congress. And they drafted (with the help of Thomas Jefferson) the Olive Branch Petition. Addressed to the King. Expressing their desire to remain loyal to His Majesty. All that they wanted was to redress these tax and trade issues. That’s all. Dickinson had hoped with the bloodshed at Lexington and Concord and a little bit of groveling the King would at least meet them halfway. Open up the channels of dialog. Settle their differences without additional bloodshed. Which just exasperated John Adams. He thought it was a waste of time. That independence was inevitable. And he vented these feelings in a private letter. That the British got hold of. Arriving in London about the same time as did the Olive Branch Petition. And after reading Adams’ letter George III refused to even read the petition. His response was the Proclamation of Rebellion. Issued in August. Declaring that some of the British American colonies were in a state of ‘open and avowed rebellion’. And followed that up with the Prohibitory Act in December. Which placed a naval blockade against all American ports. And declared all American shipping enemies of the British Crown. An act of war. To which the Americans responded by issuing letters of marque to privateers, authorizing them by an act of Congress to capture British ships. John Adams declared that King George had declared what the Americans had not yet declared. That the American colonies were independent. Putting the Americans ever closer to declaring their independence.
Then came that final push. In the form of a pamphlet. Very popular reading during the time. It was because of these pamphlets that most Americans knew of the ideas of Hobbes, Locke and Montesquieu. Where their ideas were presented in the language of the common man. Then came along an author who wrote from the get-go in the language of the common man. Thomas Paine. Who wrote Common Sense. Published in January 1776. Which tore into the King. And the whole system of hereditary monarchy. Blamed George III for all the wrongs done to the Americans. Making a strong and impassioned case for independence. Without further delay. That fired up Patriots everywhere. Providing that final push.
The Several States united in Treason and became the United States of America
During the spring of 1776 states began discussing independence. Some authorized their delegates in the Continental Congress to vote for independence. Others need more prodding. On June 11, 1776 the Continental Congress appointed John Adams of Massachusetts, Benjamin Franklin of Pennsylvania, Thomas Jefferson of Virginia, Robert R. Livingston of New York and Roger Sherman of Connecticut to draft a declaration of independence. The Committee of Five. The committee (including Jefferson) wanted Adams to write it. Adams wanted Jefferson to write it. Because he was a Virginian. Someone more distant from the passions in Massachusetts. And was rather likeable. Unlike Adams. And Jefferson was pretty good with the quill. Eloquent. And had a flair for words.
John Dickinson still argued for reconciliation. Adams argued for independence. The debate heated up. The New York legislation had to flee from the British advance in New York. So they could not authorize their delegates to vote for independence. Dickinson couldn’t agree to let Pennsylvanian vote for independence. But he agreed to abstain. It came down to a tie. Until Caesar Rodney rushed in from Delaware just in time to vote for independence. And on July 2, 1776, they committed the final act of treason. And voted the American colonies independent of the British Crown. Then put their name to the Declaration of Independence on July 4th, 1776. Or some of them. The others adding their names some time thereafter.
The several states became united. In treason. A confederacy of independent states joined in union. Not quite along the lines of the Galloway plan. But in union nonetheless. Now locked in mortal combat with the world’s greatest superpower. To escape their oppression. In order to win the same liberty and freedom enjoyed by the subjects of that very same superpower. For in the end that’s all the Americans wanted. And had King George redressed their grievances instead of choosing to punish them everyone would have lived happily ever after as British subjects. But he didn’t. And we now remember him as the British king that lost America.
Tags: Adams, Americans, Benjamin Franklin, Boston, British, British Americans, British colonies, British Crown, British subjects, Common Sense, Constitution, constitutional monarchy, Continental Congress, Declaration of Independence, Declaration of Rights and Grievances, Dickinson, Franklin, Galloway, Galloway Plan of Union, George III, George Washington, Great Britain, Hobbes, independence, Jefferson, John Adams, John Dickinson, Joseph Galloway, King George, King George III, Lexington and Concord, liberty, Locke, Massachusetts, Montesquieu, Olive Branch Petition, Parliament, Patrick Henry, Philadelphia, Proclamation of Rebellion, Prohibitory Act, reconciliation, Richard Henry Lee, Samuel Adams, Suffolk Resolves, Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Paine, union, Washington
The Restoration brought Charles II to the Throne and gave him a Standing Army
Before the English Civil War there were no standing armies in England. During Medieval times everyone was a soldier. A ‘citizen’ soldier. Fighting in a part-time militia. You answered your lord’s call “to arms.” Fought. Usually to protect your lord’s land from intruders. Or to join a higher noble or king to fight an opposing noble or king. But mostly you fought near your home. And when you were done fighting you went back to your day job. If you survived. The sooner the better because there was usually a lot of work to do. And family to take care of. But this all changed during the English Civil War. Thanks to Prince Rupert of the Rhine. A dashing cavalier commander and veteran of some European fighting. He brought his professional military skills to England. And fought for his uncle, King Charles I, during the English Civil War.
His skill won a lot of battles for Charles I. And impressed Oliver Cromwell. Who was fighting for Parliament. So impressed him that he copied from Prince Rupert. And created the New Model Army. A professional army. Trained. Well disciplined. And paid. That fought anywhere. Ultimately winning the war for Parliament. Then marching on London for back pay. They held the power. And installed Oliver Cromwell as Lord Protector of the new commonwealth (no monarchy or hereditary power). Who used the New Model Army to keep the peace. Rather brutally. Especially in Ireland. Where they had no family. And had no problem in being brutal.
After Cromwell executed his father, Charles I, the Scots crowned Charles II king. For Charles I was a Scott. And they were none too pleased that the English killed him. Charles marched south and tried to restore the monarchy. Failed. And Cromwell chased him all the way to France. Where he lived during the English commonwealth. In Louis XIV’s court. An absolute monarchy. The way it used to be in England. Before Parliament. And King Louis had something new. A standing army. Even in times of peace. And the French people didn’t bitch about the costs. Like Parliament did about every cost the royals incurred. When Cromwell died his son inherited his office of Lord Protector. So much for the elimination of heredity power. But he was weak. Couldn’t control the army. And didn’t last. Without a better option they talked to Charles II. Who said he would offer some pardons if they made him king. He would not seek any retribution for the killing of his dad. And he’d pay the army. And that fast England (and Scotland and Ireland) had a king again. (The Restoration.) And a standing army.
The British Subjects in North America did not have the same Rights as British Subjects in Great Britain
The British put that army to use during the 18th century. Fighting a lot of wars. In Europe. And elsewhere. With lots of soldiers serving garrison duty throughout the world to protect their colonial interests. Costing a pretty penny. The very reason why people don’t like standing armies. They’re very costly. In war. As well as in peace. Especially the peace that followed the Seven Years’ War (1756-1763). Great Britain won a lot of colonial land from the French. Particularly in North America. Where French Quebec became British. Giving the British nearly the entire North American continent. Full of Native Americans none too happy with the outcome of the Seven Years’ War. (Chief Pontiac of the Ottawa nearly threw the British out in 1763.) Or their French Allies. And the job of keeping the peace fell to the British Army. Those infamous Red coats.
During the 18th century Great Britain was a constitutional monarchy with a representative government. The king was still sovereign but he ruled with the consent of Parliament. And their money. During this time William Pitt the Elder, British Secretary of State, had built up a large and prosperous colonial empire. Over this century the balance of power tilted away from Spain and France and towards Great Britain. The Seven Years’ War in particular ended economically favorable for the British at the expense of the French. This meant a lot of money for those in commerce. Which made the taxpayers agreeable to some of these military costs. But at the same time this last war left Great Britain broke and in debt. Worse, she needed a larger military to garrison all that territory she had just won. And those taxpayers, represented in Parliament, weren’t going to say yes to any more taxes. Because they could. In constitutional Great Britain there was no taxation without the consent of those British subjects taxed. Well, for some of those British subjects.
The British subjects in North America did not have the same rights as British subjects in Great Britain. The British Empire needed revenue. And Parliament turned to the American colonies to collect it. Without their consent. Something not allowed by the Bill of Rights. A 1689 act of English Parliament. So the British Americans took some offense. And then the anti-American legislation came. The Sugar Act of 1764 taxing sugar. The Quartering Act of 1765 forcing Americans to provide quarters for and to feed British troops. The Stamp Act of 1765 taxing printed materials. The Declaratory Act of 1766 which repealed the Stamp Act due to fierce opposition but made all laws passed by Parliament legal and binding in the colonies. The Townshend Acts starting in 1767 which tried to make the taxes more palatable by taxing only imports. They didn’t. It also raised revenue for the British to pay judges and custom officials to keep them loyal to the distant Crown rather than the local populace. The Commissioners of Customs Act of 1767 that established an administrative board to enforce these new acts. Headquartered in Boston. America’s leading port. This caused a lot of resentment and open hostility to the Crown’s representatives in Boston. To protect them and to maintain order the British occupied Boston in 1768. Sending in the Red coats.
Parliament sued for Peace after Cornwallis surrendered in Yorktown because the War had grown too Costly to Continue
This was all very un-English. Not since the days of the New Model Army had English subjects lived under the tyranny of a standing army. A very costly standing army. Paid for by all of those revenue acts. So here they were. British subjects. Who lost centuries of hard-earned rights. Some going back to Magna Carta in 1215. While their British brethren were living under a constitutional monarchy in Great Britain. Enjoying all of their rights. Where life in North America was turning into an absolute monarchy. Like their most hated enemy. The French.
This all boiled over in Boston in 1770. Beginning with a British sentry. Some kid forced to stand guard among a hostile populace. It started with a misunderstanding. But the hatred of the British helped to escalate it. Until a mob had gathered. Taunting the sentry to fire his weapon. British reinforcements arrived. Someone struck and knocked down a private. Who grabbed his weapon and fired. Then other shots rang out. Even though the commanding officer did not give the order to fire. Killing 3. And wounding 8. The infamous Boston Massacre. Patriot and future Founding Father John Adams actually represented the British in court. Where they got a fair trial. And the case Adams presented convinced a Boston jury to find most of those on trial not guilty. Including the commanding officer. Which was the last act of civility between these two British peoples.
Hostilities would only grow. And within 5 years there would be a shooting war. That would take 8 years before a peace would finally end it. A war won, interestingly, not by a part-time militia. But by a professional standing army. That thing the Americans so hated. But whose very existence prevented an American defeat. Something General George Washington fully understood. Who may have lost more battles than he won. But he won the most important battle of them all. Keeping that army in the field. Until the point where Parliament said enough was enough. Sinking ever further into debt they sued for peace after Cornwallis surrendered in Yorktown. The war had simply grown too costly to continue. And the taxpayers no longer gave their consent to continue to pay for it.
Tags: absolute monarchy, American, Boston, Boston Massacre, British, British Army, British Empire, British subjects, Charles II, colonial empire, commonwealth, constitutional monarchy, England, English, English Civil War, France, French, Great Britain, king, Lord Protector, militia, New Model Army, North America, Oliver Cromwell, Parliament, Red coats, Seven Years War, standing army, taxes, taxpayers, the Restoration, Townshend Acts
Englishman John Lock believed not in the Divine Right of Kings but in the Sovereignty of the People
After the English Civil War, and the English Republic with Oliver Cromwell as Lord Protector, Britain had a king again. Charles II. Taking the throne in 1660. And after what Britain just went through he was going to rule a little more carefully than his dad Charles I. Who was, after all, beheaded by Parliament. Charles believed in the Divine Right of Kings. But he wasn’t going to mess with Parliament. He didn’t want anyone saying like father like son about him.
In fact, things really began to change under Charles II. It was the age of empiricism. The era of observing things. And making sense out of what you saw. Which led to some questioning of Church doctrine. For the Church said they understood everything. Such as the earth being the center of the universe. And in the Divine Right of Kings. But then Galileo observed that the earth revolved around the sun. Contrary to Church doctrine. So if the Church was wrong about how the universe worked then perhaps they were wrong about the Divine Right of Kings, too. People started questioning things. Francis Bacon who lived through the English Civil War questioned some of the old books. Believing more in observing things. And thinking about what you observed. Tom Hobbes observed life and thought people were a lost cause. And needed the heavy hand of government to protect them from each other. To alleviate their suffering from a life that was “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short.” John Locke, a veteran of the English Civil War, thought a lot about what he observed. He believed everyone was born equal. And innocent. He didn’t believe in the Divine Right of Kings or the nobility. And that government ruled at the consent of the governed. The idea that kings weren’t sovereign. The people were.
It was also a science renaissance. Smart guys were figuring out how to master their environment. And the seas. This was the era when the world got smaller. As ships began to navigate the oceans. And the great European powers colonized other lands. Things were looking up in Britain. Until Charles II died and his son took over being king (1685). King James II. Who had none of his father’s cunning political skill (who ruled following a civil war that ended monarchy). Who liked to rule as he pleased, believing more in the Divine Right of Kings than in Parliament. But worse of all he was a Catholic. While the English were still Protestant. And fiercely anti-Catholic. Especially with all of this new thinking going on. They were done with Catholic dogma for good. And when James started making the Protestant churches of England and Scotland Catholic, well, the people had had enough.
The Act of Succession brought a German from Hanover to the British Throne
James II was chased out of England into exile in France. A Dutch prince came over to do the job. William of Orange. A stout Protestant. Who had married James’ daughter. Mary. With James abdicating his throne (by running away) Parliament made William and Mary joint monarchs. Not quite a revolution. But we call it one anyway. The Glorious Revolution. Because the William/Mary monarchy was conditional on a Bill of Rights. Which basically said Protestants and Parliament were in. The Divine Right of Kings and Catholics were out. Which was good if you were a Protestant. But particularly unpleasant if you were a Catholic in Scotland or Ireland. Who suffered dearly under William.
Things were looking up again for Protestant, liberty-loving Britons. But the royal monarchs were getting old. And had no male heirs. Even Mary’s sister, Anne, failed to produce a male heir. Big problem. Then they found a widow of a dead German prince with some Stuart blood in her. Sophia of Hanover. Whose mother was the daughter of one James I. (The dad of Charles I. King Charles I, of course, being the king Parliament executed after he lost the English Civil War). And more importantly she was a Protestant. Problem solved. The Act of Succession (1701) formally passed the throne to Electress Sophia after everyone else ahead of her died. And to her heirs upon her death. The act further stated that a Catholic shall never, ever, sit on the British throne.
Queen Mary died in 1694. William III followed in 1702. Making Anne Queen. Under her reign Scotland joined England in formal union. Creating a large free-trade zone. The impetus for the Scots to sign on the dotted line. The Act of Union ended the Scottish parliament. Scottish ministers now sat in the British parliament. In the new union called Great Britain. In time the Scots and the English would stand shoulder to shoulder on battlefields throughout the world. Fighting Catholics. And others. Building an empire. Meanwhile Sophia died. Before Anne. So when Anne died the throne passed to her son. George. Who enjoyed being home in Hanover more than being in England. And spent more time in his German kingdom. At first angering Parliament. But then they grew to like the idea of having all that unfettered power.
British Americans enjoyed their British Heritage, their Religious Freedom and their Constitutional Monarchy
It was the age of Parliament. And constitutional monarchy. While George was home in Hanover Parliament governed Great Britain. It was political parties that fought each other. Not the Parliament and king. The Whigs (who favored the Hanover line of succession). And the Tories (who favored the House of Stuart). Whigs supported religious freedom. For them any form of Protestantism was okay. The Tories preferred only those Protestants in the Church of England. But they united in their opposition to all things Catholic. Thanks to a financial scandal tied to the Tories the Whigs ruled for most of the 18th century. The Whigs MPs grew powerful. Especially Sir Robert Walpole. Who the people began calling Prime Minister.
The 18th century saw a series of wars in Europe and throughout the world. All of which could be boiled down to two things. Economic advantage. And the never ending battle between Protestantism and Catholicism. Which put Protestant Great Britain and Catholic France in a near perpetual state of war in the 18th century. In the Old World. And in the New World. Meanwhile the British Americans in the New World were coming of age. Enjoying their British heritage. Their religious freedom. And their constitutional monarchy. For awhile, at least. Until they picked up on that idea Locke had. About the people being sovereign.
Tags: Act of Succession, Bill of Rights, Britain, British throne, Catholic, Charles I, Charles II, constitutional monarchy, divine right of kings, empiricism, England, English Civil War, France, George, Glorious Revolution, Great Britain, Hanover, Ireland, James II, John Locke, Mary, New World, Parliament, Protestant, Scotland, Sophia, Tories, Whigs, William of Orange
King John renounced, and Pope Innocent III annulled, Magna Carta
England had been more French than English following the Norman Conquest. The ruling class spoke French. And had stronger connections to France than they did to England. The Kingdom of England did, after all, extend across the English Channel into France. The English nobility, on the other hand, were more English than French. This caused friction between the land owners (the barons) and the king. Because even though the king had official power the barons paid the taxes. Which meant the king could do anything he wanted with his power as long as the barons agreed to pay for it. And provided his armies. For the king had no standing armies. Which proved to be a bit of a restraint on being king.
The barons, though, felt the king was abusing them. The king was spending a lot of money on many losing military campaigns and stepping on the barons’ privileges. They presented Magna Carta to King John. Which put in writing limitations on the king’s powers. And the requirement that the king shall consult Parliament (common counsel of the realm including the clergy higher-ups and the more powerful barons) before raising new taxes. Something no king would willingly submit to. Unless it was a way to stall for time. So King John applied his Great Seal to Magna Carta. Making it the law of the land. But with his fingers crossed behind his back. Figuratively, of course.
Well, King John renounced the Great Charter once the barons had left London. And Pope Innocent III annulled it. Because of that divine rights of kings thing. Kings could do whatever they wanted because God gave them that right. While the Church made sure he didn’t abuse this power. Anyway, long story short, the king refused to honor his agreement. Which resulted in the First Barons’ War. It lasted a couple of years. The barons invited Prince Louis, son and heir apparent of the French king, to join them in their fight against King John. Something any French Royal would be glad to do. Then King John died and the barons became worried about Prince Louis. Some fighting and sieges later, Louis got some money and went back to France. King John’s son Henry was then crowned King Henry III. He was 9 years old. Until he came of age his royal keepers ruled in his stead. And brought back Magna Carta. With some changes.
The House of Lords and the House of Commons formed the Houses of Parliament
Well, all’s well that ends well, yes? No. For when the new king came of age he wanted to restore absolute monarchy. Like they had (and he admired) in France. He married a French woman. And brought a lot of his French relatives into high positions in his realm. Highly religious, he supported the papal invasion of Sicily. Which was a disaster. Well, you can guess where this led to. More fighting with the barons over Magna Carta. To remind him there were limits on his powers. Which the barons hammered home in the Provisions of Oxford.
The Provisions of Oxford is considered England’s first written constitution. The barons wrote it. In English. The new language of the ruling class. No more of that French nonsense. And presented it to King Henry III. Placing power into the hands of a council. Not the king. There would be 24 members in this council. Half chosen by the king. Half chosen by the barons. Parliament would oversee the council. And meet 3 times a year. Power was now with Parliament. Not the king. Which was huge for its day.
The king summoned the nobility and senior clergy to advise him. When he needed money he summoned knights and burgesses, too. Representatives of the common people. These common people met alone in 1341. And the upper and lower houses of Parliament were born. The House of Lords (nobility and clergy). And the House of Commons (knights and burgesses). Together they were the Houses of Parliament.
The Many, the Few and the One
Governing by the consent of the governed was here. But the journey wasn’t over yet. There would be many more bumps in the road ahead. Including the English Civil War. With lots of English-French issues to resolve. And a lot of Catholic-Protestant issues, too. Not to mention the Welsh, Scottish and Irish issues. But the general shape of things to come was here. For England. Great Britain. And the United Kingdom. Absolute monarchy was out. Constitutional monarchy was in. Representative government. Where all had a say. The commons. The nobility. And the king. The many, the few and the one.
Tags: absolute monarchy, barons, burgesses, clergy, common people, Constitution, constitutional monarchy, council, England, English, France, French, Great Charter, House of Commons, House of Lords, Houses of Parliament, king, King Henry III, King John, knights, Magna Carta, monarchy, nobility, Parliament, Provisions of Oxford, ruling class, taxes
The Allies were Commanded by an American because they had the Greatest Skin in the Game
During World War II, SHAEF stood for the Supreme Headquarters, Allied Expeditionary Forces. This was the top command of the Allies fighting on the Western Front during World War II. In the European Theater of Operations (ETO). The Soviet Union fought on the Eastern Front. Neither front was subordinate to the other in the command structure.
The supreme allied commander of SHAEF was General Eisenhower. An American. Why? Well the Nazis conquered France early in the war. Thanks to blitzkrieg. Which the Allies weren’t ready yet to battle. So the SHAEF commander wasn’t French. But the British were in the war from the beginning. They and their commonwealth put some 11 million into the field of battle. And suffered about a million killed and wounded. But the SHAEF commander wasn’t British either. Even though we couldn’t have defeated Nazi Germany without the British.
No, the SHAEF commander was an American because they put some 16 million into the field of battle. So excluding the Soviets, the Americans had the greatest skin in the game. Literally. And figuratively. It was the American Arsenal of Democracy that furnished the implements of war. Financed by the American taxpayer. Via bonds. Rationing. And inflation.
Those who Risk their Wealth should have a Say in How it is Risked
There were a lot of service flags hanging in American windows during World War II. And far too many of them had gold stars on them. One gold star represented the loss of a son or daughter in the war. There were about 417,000 gold stars in American windows. Not quite as many as the approximately 580,000 British dead. And a long way from the approximately 8,600,000 Soviet dead. But as America entered the war, the sheer numbers of man and material America provided made it America’s war. Which is why there was an American commanding SHAEF. Because even though Nazi Germany didn’t attack America, it was her blood and treasure leading the war against Nazi Germany.
So an American general would lead the Allies. Because the Americans had the most skin in the game. They were now bearing the greatest costs for the war. So they had the ultimate say in how the Allies waged war. I mean, no one would expect a Belgian general to command those 16 million Americans. No offense to the Belgians. I mean, I like their waffles and all. It’s just that Belgium wasn’t America. They didn’t have the resources. Nor the distance from the Third Reich.
Risk and wealth. Those who risk their wealth should have a say in how it is risked. Because it takes wealth (blood and treasure) to wage war. And this goes back to the birth of limited government. The Magna Carta. When the feudal barons of England met King John on the fields of Runnymede. And said, “Look, yeah you’re king and all but that doesn’t give you the right to do as you bloody well please.” I’m paraphrasing, of course. You see, the king was being rather oppressive. And fighting a lot of wars. Costly wars. And the funny thing about kings? They don’t have wealth. They get it from the landowners. The landed aristocracy. Those feudal barons. The men and material to fight wars, and the money to pay for them, came from them. So these barons were saying, “In the future, you clear things with us first, okay?” And constitutional monarchy was born.
Thanks to the Magna Carta those Paying the Taxes would have a Say in How the King Spent those Taxes
In the days of feudalism we defined wealth by land holdings. Because back then the most important industry was growing food. To prevent famine. And you needed land to grow food. So wealth concentrated to the land owners. The landed aristocracy. Who provided the food for the realm. Soldiers. And taxes.
Thanks to the Magna Carta, things changed. Those paying the taxes would have a say in how the king spent those taxes. He couldn’t wage endless war anymore. Or spend it all on royal accouterments. No. From then on, spending would have to be responsible. We take it for granted in the West today. And call it taxation with representation. But it was a BIG deal back then. And mostly only in England. France had an absolute monarchy. And the king did whatever he bloody well pleased. And you see how well that turned out for King Louis XVI. Ask Marie Antoinette. Of course you can’t. Because they were both executed by the people during the French Revolution.
The British took their representative government to the New World. And after the American Revolution, that was one of the British things the Americans kept. At the heart of the American populace was a hatred of taxation. And arbitrary rule. So they kept a tight grip on the government. And their wealth. There were no kings in the new United States of America. But there was still government. And a strong distrust of government power. So they were going to write their constitutions very carefully. And restrict the vote only to those who had skin in the game. Land owners. Who were paying the taxes.
Figuring out how to Amass Power despite the Inconvenience of Elections
Of course this changed over time. Nowadays, people who pay no taxes whatsoever can vote. We’ve come a long way from Runnymede. And returned a lot of power to government. In America, about half of all people pay no federal income tax. Yet they can vote. And they do. For the party that promises them more free stuff. By taxing ‘the rich’ to pay for it. And you know what these non-taxpayers say? “Raise tax rates? Absolutely. I mean, what do I care? It’s not like I’m paying them.” I’m paraphrasing, of course. But you can see the problem.
They have no skin in the game. And the only reason they don’t is because ‘the rich’ have been keeping them down. At least that’s what they believe. Because those in power told them this. So they can keep raising taxes. And keep increasing the power of government.
It’s nothing new. There are those who just want power. Kings often took power by force. When it was clear that the rich barons were more important to the king than the king was to them, though, things changed. There were limits on absolute power. So those who coveted power had to be creative. And figure out how to amass power despite the inconvenience of elections.
Politics Today: Buy Votes with State Benefits and scare the Bejesus out of Old People
The answer was the welfare state. And class warfare. Buy votes. And demonize ‘the rich’. Get the people dependent on government. And anytime there is political opposition, tell the people that the opposition wants to cut your state benefits. To scare the people into voting for you.
We call Social Security and Medicare third-rail issues in America. Because if you threaten to cut them (i.e., touch them), you will die politically. As you would die if you touched the electrified third rail in the subway. Because the recipients of those programs live in fear of losing their benefits. And will always vote for the candidate who promises not to cut them.
And this is how you amass power when saddled with the inconvenience of elections. Buy votes with state benefits. And scare the bejesus out of old people. Telling them the political opposition wants to take your benefits away. Attack the rich. And tax them. To pay for the ever bloating welfare state.
And if at least half of the people pay no taxes, you’re golden. Because when that many people have no skin in the game, you can get away with just about anything you want.
Tags: Allies, American, aristocracy, barons, benefits, Big Government, blood and treasure, British, buy votes, class warfare, Constitution, constitutional monarchy, demonize the rich, don't pay taxes, elections, England, feudal barons, feudalism, higher tax rates, inconvenience of elections, king, King John, landed aristocracy, landowners, limited government, Magna Carta, Nazi Germany, representative government, risk, Runnymede, SHAEF, skin in the game, state benefits, tax rates, taxation, taxes, taxpayer, vote, wealth, welfare state, World War II
No King Ever Ruled Without the Consent of Money
There were kings. And there were wealthy landowners. Kings may have been sovereign. But the wealth lies with, as you may guess, the wealthy landowners. Kings needed money. Because doing king ‘things’ got expensive. War, armies, navies, festivals, feasts, castles, palaces, churches, etc., were very expensive. So kings taxed their subjects to raise the money they needed to be king. And when it came to money, the vast majority (i.e., the peasants) had little. It was the peasants’ landlords who had the money. And it was they who paid the bulk of the taxes.
But it was a two-way street. Because it was their money, they, the wealthy landowners, had a say in how the king spent that money. This was a restraint on the king’s power. There were laws to protect the property rights of these landlords. Now. And in the future. Property owners could pass their property on to their heirs. As well as their political standing with the king. Thus the rich and landed aristocracy passed on both their property and their nobility through inheritance. Thus kings and Nobility lived by the consent of the other. And they each lived by the consent of money.
The Roman emperors spent so much money near the end of the Roman Empire that they brought their advanced civilization to an end. The landed aristocracy survived, though. They just served a different sovereign. The masses (i.e., the poor peasants) still worked the land. The landlords still held the wealth. Kings would come and go but this way of life (feudalism) remained. Kings ruled as long as the landed aristocracy didn’t object too much. Which they did in England in 1215. The landed aristocracy met King John on the field of Runnymede. Seeing his power was not absolute, the king reluctantly set his seal to the Magna Charter. Constitutional monarchy would reign in England. And England would reign supreme in the Old World. And in the New World.
No Taxation Without Representation
The constitutional monarchy that developed consisted of the Crown and a bicameral Parliament. The two houses of Parliament represented the needs of the few (the House of Lords) and the many (the House of Commons). Thus the needs of the one (the sovereign), the few (the rich) and the many (the not rich) were balanced against each other. It was a pretty good system. The best in its time. An English citizen had a better and more comfortable life with greater liberty than citizens of most other countries.
This liberalism unleashed a flurry of economic activity. It created an empire. International trade exploded. England became a leader in farming and agriculture. This knowhow spread throughout her empire. As did her representative government. Which they established in their North American colonies. Perhaps a bit too firmly. With the costs of world war came the need for higher taxes. The British had just defeated the French and took possession of all their possessions in North America. Her English subjects there were now free from French aggression. And Parliament wanted these subjects to pick up a large part of that war tab.
Well, this didn’t go over well in the colonies. For they had no representation in Parliament. They had their own representative governing bodies in the colonies. But they were subject to royal governors appointed by Parliament. Without a vote in Parliament, they had no say in matters of taxation. This was very un-English. For the English nobility consented to taxation in exchange for having a say in how the king would spend those taxes. As the landed aristocracy protested in 1215, the Americans protested this taxation without representation. Eight war years later and America left the mother country. Another few years later they ratified the Constitution and created the United States of America. Which came to be because a governing body violated the sacred covenant between a king and his subjects. A king may only rule as those who pay the kingdom’s taxes approve.
Universal Suffrage Increases Our Suffering
Because the new American government taxed property owners, property ownership was a requirement to vote. In other words, those with the most to lose (those paying the taxes) had a say in how the government spent their taxes. It kept the government honest. By limiting the vote to those who had ‘skin in the game’ it made it hard for government to build palaces for themselves. Because there was a direct connection between the source of funding and what that funding was used for. The government may persuade the tax-paying voter for the need for a national postal system. But a palatial palace was a much harder sell to the one footing the bill. Especially when that person would never enjoy its benefit.
Such a system led to responsible government. It minimized political corruption. And if there is anything a politician doesn’t like it’s this. They like corruption. They thrive on it. It’s their raison d’être. And this responsibility thing just didn’t cut it. They need people to vote who have no skin in the game. People they can buy. So they can live the good life. Like in days of old. Enter universal suffrage. Where a politician can promise people other people’s money.
Wait a minute, you mean I can have a say in how other people spend their money? Sweet. Gimme gimme gimme. I me mine. Tax the rich. Health care is an entitlement. I mean, as long as someone else is paying, I’m for sale. Promise me whatever I want and I will vote for you. And forget what Benjamin Franklin warned us about:
When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.
Money Talks; Egalitarianism Walks
It probably started with Martin Van Buren. Creator of the Democrat Party. He created the party machine. Patronage. Payoffs. And buying votes. Dirty, filthy politics began with him. And the Democrat Party. Beginning with the campaign for Andrew Jackson, politics have gotten worse ever since.
It’s about the money now more than ever. With the power to tax, government has a near unlimited source of money. And with it they can get power. By promising money to people that don’t have money. Lots of it. Thanks to universal suffrage, they can bus as many poor, indigent and government-depended people to the polls as possible. And the more of them the better. For they will vote for whoever promises to give them the most free stuff. And why not? They have no skin in the game.
And by voting themselves a permanent entitlement, they will make themselves a permanent underclass. Where they will remain poor, indigent and government-depended. As government spending continues to grow unchecked, it will push people down the economic ladder until the middle class disappears. There will be only the rich (the government and the government-connected). And the poor. Just like in days of old. Which is the goal of our tax policy. You see, across the board tax cuts do not enhance the dependency-power relationship. But targeted tax cuts do. That’s why Big Government favors a complicated tax code. It enhances the dependency-power relationship. That empowers Big Government. Throws egalitarianism out the window. And makes life good for the ruling elite.
Tags: across the board tax cuts, aristocracy, Big Government, British, consent of money, constitutional monarchy, Democrat Party, dependency-power relationship, economic activity, Egalitarianism, England, English citizen, entitlement, feudalism, higher taxes, House of Commons, House of Lords, kings, landed aristocracy, landlords, liberalism, Magna Charter, middle class, nobility, North America, Parliament, peasants, permanent entitlement, permanent underclass, Political Corruption, politically expedient, politicians, poor peasants, property rights, representative government, responsible government, Runnymede, skin in the game, sovereign, tax code, tax policy, taxation without representation, taxes, the Crown, the masses, universal suffrage, wealthy landowners
A Dumb Animal is a Content Animal
We had a customer once across from a slaughterhouse. The customer is long gone. But the slaughterhouse is still there. I remember one cold December day. It was close to the holidays. A festive time. Parked in the street were two cattle trucks. You could see their breath puffing out through the slats. They had no idea what was waiting for them once they left those trucks. They just stood there. Quiet. And content.
I had a cat once that lived to a ripe old age. In his old age, he suffered a stroke in his back end. His rear legs weren’t that steady. His feet kind of flopped around when he walked. He spent most of his days in the basement on an old chair. His water dish was underneath the chair. And a litter box was only a few steps away. We took food down to him. But every hour or so he struggled up the steps to the food dish in my study. He ate. Then I picked him up and placed him on my lap for some petting. He purred profusely. After 10 minutes or so he squirmed to get down. Ate some more. Then limped back downstairs. He was a shadow of his old nimble self. But he was content. To him, his life was normal. He couldn’t dwell about what was. Or what will be. He just knew when his tummy was empty. And when he craved affection.
In Gone with the Wind, when Atlanta was burning, Rhett Butler was helping Scarlet escape the city. The fire panicked their horse, though. It reared up and refused to move. So Rhett covered the horse’s eyes and said something like, “You’ll like this better if you can’t see it.” The horse calmed down. The fire was still there all around them. But the horse couldn’t see it. And they made their escape with Rhett leading the blindfolded horse.
Dwelling on the Fear of the Unknown
Sure, they’re just dumb animals. But are we really all that different? Apart from having hands with opposable thumbs, consciousness, an advanced language, our use of tools and our farming and animal husbandry skills to provide an abundant food supply, no. We prefer to not know unpleasant things. Especially if there’s nothing we can do to prevent those unpleasant things from happening. Or think too much about good things. If there’s a chance we can spoil them.
A pitcher throwing a perfect game (27 up and 27 out) in the major leagues is rare. It’s great when it happens. And heart-breaking when batter 27 gets on base. Whether by a base hit. Or an error. As a game moves ever closer to perfection, a deep dread and fear permeates everyone on that team. They don’t want to be that guy that spoils the perfect game. And they don’t talk about a perfect game lest they jinx it. They try to act as if they don’t know what is about to happen. To ignore the weight of the world crushing down on them.
Sometimes it’s not dwelling on the good that might not happen. Sometimes it’s dwelling on the bad that may happen. An infantry patrol going out behind enemy lines to snag some prisoners, for example. It’s dangerous. There’s a very good chance that some will not survive the patrol. As your patrol waits for h-hour, you don’t look at your fellow soldiers and wonder who might die. You don’t talk about it. You just try to push it from your mind. You go through the motions. Machine-like. Focus on the mission. And your training. And the next 5 minutes. You try not to think too far beyond that because, well, you just don’t. If something happens, it happens. Thinking about it won’t make it not happen. In fact, thinking about it may distract you a fraction of a second when the shooting starts and make it happen.
Sometimes it’s a cough that won’t go away. Or a lump that wasn’t there before. You get a sickening feeling when you think about what it may be. So you try not to think about it. You ignore it. You get used to it. Acclimate to it. You don’t dwell on it. Because the reality of it can be so unpleasant. But resorting to pure animal ignorant bliss may very well kill you. Sometimes we have to think about the unpleasant. To dwell about what might be. For if we do early enough, things don’t have to be as bad as they could be.
Have Food Will Bow
Life was pretty harsh until the British came around. Their ideas about representative government and capitalism led to a freeing of the masses from a life of drudgery and suffering like no other people did. From these ideals grew a new nation. America. And the Americans inspired an Old World nation. France.
It is hard for people today to fully understand what life was like for the average person before the ideas of representative government and capitalism. The average person was poor. Not middle class. But poor. They lived in abject poverty. They were overworked. Under paid. Oppressed. Malnourished. Emaciated. They were miserable, wretched people living miserable, wretched lives. Quite a difference from today where the average person is middle class and the poor are often overweight. Even obese.
This life was commonplace when oppressive state powers were commonplace. As the state’s power grew more limited, the average person’s life grew less miserable. The poor in pre-revolutionary France, working some of Europe’s most arable soil under an absolute monarchy, suffered from recurring famine. Meanwhile, over in the tiny island kingdom of Great Britain, a constitutional monarchy, they did not suffer recurring famines. In fact, they were grain exporters. That’s why there was no British Revolution to overthrow their monarchy as Europe trembled in the face of Napoleon’s advancing armies. Life was pretty good on that tiny little island.
People are Just Dying to Get Out of their Socialist Utopias
There are great debates about which is better. Capitalism or socialism. People like to point to European socialism as the ideal. These people are, in general, poor. When the Beatles got obscenely rich, they fled that socialistic utopia. As did others who struck it rich. Why? To keep what they had earned.
Because the vast majority is poor or middle class, we’ll never solve this debate. The poor and middle class will feel little pity for the rich and approve of confiscatory taxation. Until they become rich, that is. But what about other countries? Cuba? North Korea? The former Soviet Union? The People’s Republic of China in the days of the great famines?
Cubans boarded makeshift rafts and risked their lives to make it to Florida. Those who could in North Korea, like pilots, defected and flew to South Korea. The Soviet Union had to bribe and hold family members hostage to prevent their spies from defecting once they crossed over into the west.
The Soviet Union would eventually collapse and break out in capitalism. Communist China allowed some capitalism to prevent a collapse. Cuba was once a jewel in the Caribbean and now can’t even make a decent cigar. The North Koreans are still suffering recurring famines and chronic energy shortages. No, in these hardcore socialist states the message is clear. Life for the average person is little better than it was in the Middle Ages. And those who could escape their ‘utopias’ did.
Blinders are Okay if you’re a Horse
The scary thing is that these communist nations started out as people’s revolutions. They attacked the rich. Even the middle class. They promised their people everything (more food, shorter working days, free universal health care, free universal education, etc.). And, in most cases, failed to deliver.
These nations didn’t become totalitarian states overnight. It was a process. A process that went from good intentions to bad to worse. And here we are in America. Big Government promising us the same things. Free food for the poor. Shorter working days (by empowering unions). Free universal health care (which is just one public option away). And free college education for all.
Should we be concerned? Yes. Because these stories always end the same. After a people votes themselves the treasury, poverty and tyranny typically follow. It’s like a cancer growing. And we shouldn’t ignore it. For if we do, it will only spread further. And the further it spreads the harder it will be to get rid of it.
America was the first republic not to collapse. Can we continue to be that notable exception? Not by wearing blinders. As unpleasant it is, we must face this unpleasant truth.
Tags: absolute monarchy, abundant food supply, America, Big Government, British, capitalism, China, communist nations, confiscatory taxation, constitutional monarchy, Cuba, European Socialism, famine, fear of the unknown, food supply, France, Great Britain, ignorant bliss, life of drudgery, middle class, People's Republic of China, people's revolutions, recurring famine, representative government, socialism, socialist utopias, Soviet Union