The IRS targeted 100% of Conservative Groups filing for Tax Exempt Status but only 30% of Progressive Groups

Posted by PITHOCRATES - June 30th, 2013

Week in Review

Many were shocked that President Obama won reelection.  What with the horrible economy.  And the Benghazi scandal.  But what was even more shocking was why Mitt Romney lost.  And it wasn’t because of the Hispanic vote.  It was because conservatives sat at home on election night.  Instead of voting.  Baffling many.  Especially with the huge conservative turnout during the 2010 midterm elections.  Thanks to the Tea Party movement.  Which seemed strangely quiet during the 2012 campaign.  Now we know why they were quiet during that election.  Because the IRS was actively silencing their voice.

Whoa, whoa, said the Democrats.  Now hold on a minute.  The IRS is politically neutral.  And the fact that 95% of the policy-makers at the IRS donated to the Obama campaign doesn’t make the IRS politically biased.  Besides, progressive groups were targeted just as much as conservative groups.  So there.  Of course, the Treasury Department Inspector General for Tax Administration begs to differ (see Treasury: IRS targeted 292 Tea Party groups, just 6 progressive groups by PAUL BEDARD posted 6/27/2013 on the Washington Examiner).

Refuting Democratic suggestions that progressive groups were also swept up in the IRS probe of the tax status of Tea Party organizations, the Treasury Department’s inspector general has revealed that just six progressive groups were targeted compared to 292 conservative groups.

In a letter to congressional Democrats, the inspector general also said that 100 percent of Tea Party groups seeking special tax status were put under IRS review, while only 30 percent of the progressive groups felt the same pressure.

The Wednesday letter to the top Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee punched a huge hole in Democratic claims that progressive groups were targeted as much as the Tea Party groups from May 2010-May 2012, the height of the Tea Party movement.

The letter from the Treasury Department Inspector General for Tax Administration revealed that there just weren’t many progressive groups who even sought special tax exempt status. A total of 20 sought it, and six were probed. All 292 Tea Party groups, meanwhile, were part of the IRS witchhunt.

Well, well, well.   The IRS influenced the 2012 election by suppressing the Tea Party’s ability to raise money to pay for political ads.  As some in the Tea Party suffered onerous IRS audits in response for their tax-exempt status request.  While others wanted to avoid an onerous IRS audit.  By keeping their name off of any Tea Party fundraiser list.  Resulting with a subdued Tea Party voice in the 2012 election.  Allowing the IRS to prevent a repeat of the 2010 midterm election.  By abusing the power of their office.  And getting the man they supported with donations 95% of the time return to office for a second term.  But the IRS isn’t politically motivated.  For they are politically neutral.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , ,

FT173: “It’s hard to trust the government collecting our personal data once the IRS admits leaking it to attack political enemies.” —Old Pithy

Posted by PITHOCRATES - June 7th, 2013

Fundamental Truth

We need to Trust our Investment Advisors with our Retirement Money

Trust.  It’s hard to get.  And easy to lose.  Trust is important.  We want to trust the people in our lives.  We need to trust the people in our lives.  If you’re in the hospital for a risky surgery you don’t want the surgeon to introduce himself like this.  “Hello.  I will be during your surgery.  They call me Dr. Butter Fingers.  Funny story, really.  I was doing a kidney transplant and the little bugger slipped out of my hands and fell to the floor.  Pity to waste a good kidney like that.  Anyway, I just want to make a few notes,” he said pulling a pen out of his pocket.  Which slipped through his fingers and fell to the floor.  “Oops.”

Planning your retirement can be a confusing and complicated task.  You will be putting aside a portion of your income for a very long time.  And you need to trust that your money will be there when you retire.  Not like those poor people who trusted Bernie Madoff.  Who lost everything in his Ponzi scheme.  That’s why we need to trust our investment advisors.  And we’re not going to trust anyone who introduces himself like this.

“Hello.  I’m Devious.  Mr. Devious.  And I will be helping you set up your retirement account.  Might I suggest adding the Brooklyn Bridge to your portfolio?  Some lovely bottomland in the Florida Everglades?  And here’s something that may interest you.  I got this fax from a Nigerian prince.  It seems that he has billions of oil profits in a bank that he needs to transfer to some other bank to get his hands on it.  All he needs is your checking account routing number.  And a small fee to make this happen.  Sounds like a great investment opportunity to me.  And I highly recommend it to you.  You can trust me.  Yes, sir.  You can trust good old Mr. Devious with your money.”

Fool me once Shame on You, Fool me Twice Shame on Me

Buying a used car can be a crapshoot.  For you’re really at the mercy of the used car salesman.  And if he doesn’t care if you ever come back to him to buy another car he can sell you a lemon.  “That smoke?  That’s normal.  You see, we just overhauled the engine.  That smoke is just the sealing compound of the head gasket melting into place.  Once it sets that smoke will clear right up.  Making that engine as good as new.  See?  You can trust me, Mr. Lying through his Teeth.”

So you happily and unsuspectingly drive away.  And then the darnedest thing happens.  The engine seizes.  You see, all of that smoke was the oil leaking into the cylinders and burning away.  So that by the time you got home the engine overheated and seized.  Because it burnt away all of the oil.  You try to get your money back but to your astonishment the contract you signed said you bought the car ‘as-is’.  And it even said the engine needed work.  So you’re screwed.  Because it turned out that Mr. Lying through his Teeth was not trustworthy.

Fool me once shame on you.  Fool me twice shame on me.  People rarely get ripped off by the same used car salesman twice.  Because once the trust is gone they won’t go back to that person.  Or that business.  Because that person has shown himself as untrustworthy.  As has that business who hired an untrustworthy salesman.  And it will be a long time before they earn that trust again.  If they can earn that trust again.

The Thought of Trusting Government to Collect our Personal Data is not only Disturbing but Frightening

Whether it’s a doctor who has a problem holding onto human organs.  A financial advisor who gives you bad investment advice.  Or a lying used car salesman.  We don’t trust untrustworthy people.  They can fool us once.  But once they do it will be very difficult for us to ever trust them again.  Because they have demonstrated to us that it is unwise to trust them.

The IRS has admitted that they harassed conservative groups.  And conservative individuals.  They audited these people.  And collected personal data from them.  Including a list of donors to the conservative groups.  People who donated anonymously.  Because they didn’t want to be politically attacked.  But the list of these donors the IRS collected found their way to a far-left website.  Who published these donors’ names.  Who then suffered political attacks.  Scaring other people from making donations to conservative groups.  Lest they, too, suffer political attacks.

This is why the latest revelations about the government collecting data on private individuals is so disturbing.  Yes, they’re data mining to find patterns to identify potential terrorists.  And they’ve been doing it since the Bush administration.  Yet they couldn’t prevent the Boston Marathon bombing.  And the Russians even warned us about the one bomber and his Dagestan past.  They couldn’t stop that with their data mining.  But they were able to shut down the political opposition during the 2012 presidential election.  This is what’s chilling about THIS administration collecting all of this personal data.  If they’re not using it to stop terrorist attacks just what are they using it for?

Whether or not it is directed from on high someone is using our personal data to harm the political enemies of this administration.  Which is a violation of the sacred trust the people place in government.  And once the trust is gone it will be a long, long time before we’re ready to trust them again.  For the thought of trusting an untrustworthy government to collect, store and analyze our personal data is not only disturbing.  It’s a little bit frightening.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,