The History of Oliver Cromwell’s New Model Army and the English Civil War were not that Distant
Benjamin Franklin said the first responsibility of every citizen is to question authority. That was kind of America’s thing. Giving the finger to the governing authority. Figuratively. And sometimes literally. Starting with King George III. One of our earliest flags said, “Don’t tread on me.” This flag had a coiled rattle snake on it. Franklin thought the rattle snake was a good symbol of the American people. If the British left us alone this snake would cause no harm. If you get too close this snake will warn you to back off by shaking its rattle. If you don’t heed this warning and threaten this snake it will strike you with lethal force.
This problem with authority almost lost the Revolutionary War for us. At first American soldiers didn’t like following orders. For if they could rebel against their king they could just as easily rebel against a commanding officer. George Washington stopped that. But this mistrust of authority was systemic. The state governments did not trust the Continental Congress. That distant central power. Anymore than they trusted that other distant central power. The British monarchy.
So the Continental Congress was woefully underfunded throughout the Revolutionary War. Finding it very difficult to supply the Continental Army. Or pay her soldiers. Something else the states didn’t trust. A standing army. For the history of Oliver Cromwell’s New Model Army and the English Civil War were not that distant. Or the peace that followed. Where that army helped keep the new government in power. And unleashed great woe and suffering to the Catholics in Ireland and Scotland.
Kings don’t suffer Personal Attacks in the Newspapers like an Elected President Does
So the Americans stood up to that distant power. And to her ministers in the American colonies. Not afraid to speak truth to power. To speak out about the abuses of King George in the colonies. Which Thomas Jefferson summarized in the Declaration of Independence. They spoke contemptuously of the ruling British authorities. When they won their independence they transferred this contempt to the new federal government. The states trusted the new central authority in the United States little more than they trusted the one on the far side of the Atlantic. And many fought as passionately against it as they fought against King George.
Even those in the new central government didn’t trust each other. Political parties formed. Alexander Hamilton led the Federalists. Who wanted a strong central government. And Thomas Jefferson led the Republicans. Who wanted a weak central government. Keeping the power in the states. Hamilton and Jefferson hated each other. Despised each other. Believed that the other was everything that was wrong in the new nation. And they attacked each other viciously in the newspapers through their surrogates. Which were extensions of these political parties. So if you wanted fair and balanced news all you had to do was read at least two newspapers. Weigh the vitriol and lies in each to arrive at the truth. Which was somewhere in between.
And these papers were pretty nasty. Even attacking the most beloved man in the country. George Washington. Calling him old and senile. Secretly British. A mere puppet controlled by that evil puppet master Alexander Hamilton. George Washington could have been king with the blessings of the American people. Instead he chose to keep the United States a republic. And suffered horribly for it. For kings don’t suffer the personal attacks in the newspapers like an elected president does. This was representative government. Where the people are sovereign. And the president is a servant of the people. Not the other way around. Like in a monarchy.
You can call LBJ and George W. Bush Murderers but you can’t ask President Obama Questions he doesn’t want to Answer
People marveled at how George Washington stepped down from power after his second term as president. Even King George said that if he did that he would be the greatest man in the world. And he did. Proving the American system. But while others marveled about how he could give up power after so short a time in office Washington more likely marveled about how long he was able to stay in office. For he hated the politics. And the newspaper attacks. He was anxious to step down. He was giddy during the transfer of power. Happy to be going home. While poor John Adams had to deal with all the politics. The newspaper attacks. And the lies.
Contrast this to President Obama. Who gets treated by the media with kid gloves. Who don’t question him at all. Or his administration. It being more like a monarchy than a republic. After 4 Americans died in Benghazi the president offered no explanation. And the media did not pressure him for one. When Congress finally got to question the Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, they asked her who was responsible for the failure to provide for the security for our diplomats in Benghazi? Who was responsible for not coming to their aid while they were under attack? And who was responsible for the lie about it being a spontaneous uprising in response to a YouTube video? She only yelled “what difference does it make?” And that was that. The media reported that the Republicans were mean to her. And never pressed her for answers. Or President Obama.
Even the people aren’t demanding answers. Which is sad. For once upon a time the people chanted, “Hey, hey, LBJ, how many kids did you kill today?” Making the political pressure of the Vietnam War so unbearable that he refused to run for a second term. But where is this outrage over President Obama’s use of drones to kill terrorists as well as the innocent civilians and children around them? Or the targeting of American citizens without any due process? We hear nothing from the people. Or the media. The same people and media who wanted to try the 9/11 mastermind, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, in a U.S. court not far from Ground Zero during the Bush Administration.
Why the double standard? Why was it okay to question authority in the Sixties and Seventies? No matter who was in power. But after that it was only permissible to question authority when Republicans were in power? Why is it you can call LBJ and George W. Bush murderers but you can’t ask President Obama questions he doesn’t want to answer? When Dr. Benjamin Carson spoke truth to power at the National Prayer Breakfast criticizing Obamacare and the president’s economic policies the Left attacked him for not showing deference to the president. How dare he exercise free speech in a public setting they asked? A far cry from “Hey, hey, LBJ, how many kids did you kill today?” No. This president we’re supposed to show deference to. As if he was a king. Why? Apparently now that the anti-establishment types are running government we are no longer to question authority but embrace it. So they can do whatever they want to do. And change the country however they want to change it. While that whole questioning authority thing was okay when they were on the outside looking in. But now that they are on the inside looking out we need to question less and obey more.
Tags: Alexander Hamilton, anti-establishment, Benghazi, Benjamin Franklin, central authority, central government, central power, Continental Congress, English Civil War, federal government, Federalists, George W. Bush, George Washington, Jefferson, King George III, LBJ, media, monarchy, New Model Army, newspaper, Oliver Cromwell, President Obama, problem with authority, question authority, Republicans, Revolutionary War, speak truth to power, Thomas Jefferson
After Winning their Independence from Great Britain the Common Enemy was no more Leaving them Little Reason to Unite
The South lost the American Civil War for a few reasons. Perhaps the greatest was the North’s industrial superiority. Her industry could make whatever they needed to wage war. While the South suffered behind the Union’s blockade. Unable to trade their cotton for the means to wage war. And then there was the fact that the North was united. While the states’ rights issue that they were fighting for prevented the South from being united. The southern states (whose governments were dominated by the planter elite) did not like the federal government in Washington (except when they forced northern states to return southern slaves). And as it turned out the states didn’t like the federal government in Richmond any better. They fought Jefferson Davis from consolidating his power. They put the states’ interests ahead of the national interest. Such as winning a war to secure their states’ rights. And any supplies a state had they wouldn’t share them with another state. Even if they had a warehouse full of surplus shoes while troops from another states fought barefoot.
So the North won the American Civil War because they were united. They had an advanced economy based on free market capitalism and free labor. And they were wealthy. Basically because of the prior two statements. But it wasn’t always like this. The United States of America is a large country. Even before it was a country. When it was only a confederation of sovereign states. With independent republican governments. Still it covered great tracts of land. Allowing the states to keep to themselves. Much like it would be some 75 years later in the South.
After winning their independence from Great Britain the common enemy was no more. And they had little reason to unite. Which they didn’t. For the several states included a lot of disparate people. Who agreed on little with the people beyond their state’s borders. Which was one of the criticisms of republican government (i.e., an elected representative government). And one held by perhaps the greatest influence on the Framers of the Constitution. French philosopher Charles de Montesquieu. Who believed that the larger the geographic size the more dissimilar the people’s interest. And therefore making republican government more difficult. As it was too difficult to arrive at a consensus with such a large electorate. Which James Madison disagreed with, making this a heated topic during the Constitutional Convention and the ratification process. But before that convention it would appear to be incontrovertible. The United States were anything but united.
The Americans defeated one Distant Central Power and were none too keen on Answering to a New Central Power
The first American identity appeared in the Continental Army. Where soldiers came from different states and fought together as Americans. General Washington fostered this spirit. Forbidding any anti-Catholic displays. One thing that all the Protestant American colonists enjoyed. No matter which state they came from. But to fight the British Empire they needed a large army drawn from all the states. And to get the French Canadians living in British Canada to join them they needed to embrace religious freedom. Even for Catholics. Which was even more important if they had any chance of getting support from the most likely foreign power. The eternal enemy of Britain. Catholic France. Washington, as well as those who served in the Continental Army, understood the success of their cause required less infighting and more uniting. That it was imperative to set aside their sectional interests. Only then could the new nation join the world of nations. Strong and independent. And avoid the European nations pulling them into their intrigues.
But of course that wasn’t going to happen. After the war no one called themselves American. Except for a few. Like Washington. And some other veterans of the Continental Army. No. The country people belonged to was their state. Thomas Jefferson, the author of the Declaration of Independence, called Virginia his country. As did most if not all of the Patriots of ’76. The war was over. They defeated the distant central power. And they were none too keen on a new central power to answer to. Even if it was on their side of the Atlantic. To these Revolutionary Patriots the Continental Congress was just another foreign legislature trying to infringe on their sovereignty.
The national congress had no power. Delegates didn’t always show up leaving the congress without a quorum. Which didn’t matter much as they couldn’t pass anything when they had a quorum. For any legislation they wanted to pass into law required a unanimous vote of all thirteen states. Which rarely happened. They couldn’t levy taxes. Which meant they couldn’t fund an army or navy to protect their states from foreign aggressors. Or protect their international trade on the high seas. Which was a problem as the British no longer provided these services. And they couldn’t repay any of their debts. Their prewar debt owed to a lot of British creditors (which they had to repay according to the treaty that ended the war and gave them their independence). Or their war debt. States owed other states. And the Congress owed foreign creditors in Europe. Especially their war-time ally. France. Who they owed a fortune to. The states charged duties and tariffs on interstate commerce. They made their own treaties with the Indians. Some states defaulted on the debt they owed to out of state creditors. States even fought each other over land. The Untied States were anything but united. And it showed.
The Delegates of the Continental Congress agreed to meet in Philadelphia in 1787 to revise the Articles of Confederation
Europe watched the Americans with amusement and contempt. The Americans didn’t get much respect from Catherine the Great, tsarina of Russia. The ruler of the world’s largest country viewed the Americans as a bit uppity and not worthy to join the European courts. Besides, she was more interested in expanding her powers into Turkey. And into Poland. Who caught some of that spirit of liberty from the Americans. That Catherine wanted to squelch. Making her less of an America fan. But it wasn’t only Russia. The Barbary pirates were targeting American shipping in the Mediterranean. Selling their crews to the slave markets of North Africa. Western settlers using the Mississippi River to ship their produce were denied passage through the Port of New Orleans by Spain. The British refused to vacate their forts in the Northwest. Even worked with the Indians to cause some mischief in the borderlands. Why did the Europeans do these things? Because they could. For the Americans could not stop them.
To make matters worse the Americans were drifting towards civil war. The northern provinces were talking about leaving the confederation and forming their own. The North feared the South would do the same. Even aligning itself more with Europe than the American states. Meanwhile the economy was tanking. Trade was down. People were out of work. Farmers were unable to pay their debts. Even losing their farms. In western Massachusetts Daniel Shays gathered together disgruntled veterans and rebelled. Again. Only this time it wasn’t against the British. It was against the legal authorities in Massachusetts. Shays Rebellion spread to other states. And grew violent. Massachusetts asked the Continental Congress for help. And the Congress asked the states for $530,000 to raise an army to put down the rebellion. Twelve of the thirteen states said “no.”
With no other choice Massachusetts went to rich people for funding. Used it to raise a militia of some 4,400 men. In time and after some bloody fighting they put down this rebellion. But some of the rebels continued a guerilla war. Making many in the new United States live in fear. Washington, despondent of what was happening to the republic he had fought for so long to secure, pleaded, “Let us look to our national character and to things beyond the present moment.” And so they did. The delegates of the Continental Congress agreed to meet in Philadelphia in 1787. To revise the Articles of Confederation. To reign in the chaos. To get their finances in order. And to gain the respect of the world of nations. But to do that would require s stronger central government. And that is exactly what emerged from Philadelphia. So they did what the Confederates did not do nearly 75 years later. Which is the reason why they lost the American Civil War. Because of an ideal. States’ rights. That was so absolute that it weakened the Confederacy to the point she could not survive. Something the Miracle of Philadelphia prevented in 1787. Which left the states sovereign. And the new federal government only governed that which extended beyond the states’ borders. And it worked well. For some 75 years. When it hit a road bump.
Tags: 1787, American, American Civil War, American identity, Barbary pirates, Britain, British, British Empire, central power, Civil War, Constitutional Convention, Continental Army, Continental Congress, creditors, debt, distant central power, federal government, France, General Washington, Great Britain, interstate commerce, Massachusetts, Miracle of Philadelphia, North, Philadelphia, republican government, Russia, Shays Rebellion, South, Spain, states' rights, Washington
Magna Carta led to Constitutional Monarchy and Representative Government
Medieval kings liked doing as they pleased. From living well. To expanding their kingdoms by force. Or trying to. As kingdoms got larger, though, this was more difficult to do. Because the larger the kingdom got the more food they had to produce. And kings didn’t feed their kingdoms from their castle vegetable gardens. They needed the wealthy and powerful landowners. Who owned the land. Grew the food. And provided the kingdom’s wealth.
These landowners made land valuable. By growing food on it. As famine was no stranger during the Middle Ages there was nothing more important than growing food. Those who did became wealthy. And their estates became mini kingdoms. With lots of peasants working the fields. And lots of soldiers to defend their land. And to fight for their king in times of war. Kings needed to maintain good relationships with these wealthy landowners. To keep them supporting their kingdoms. And to prevent any one of them from rising up and challenging the king for his throne.
King John of England was hurting his relationships with the wealthy landowners. He fought a lot of expensive wars across the English Channel in France. Which required high taxes on the English landowners. The barons. Worse, King John lost a lot of his battles in France. Losing the barons some of their Normandy lands. So the barons were becoming a little disgruntled with their king. And they rebelled. Eventually forcing the king to place his Great Seal on Magna Carta. Limiting his powers. It didn’t change things much at the time. But it would lead to constitutional monarchy. And representative government.
The Patriots of 1776 were none too keen on Creating a New Central Power
Kings don’t like limits on their power. King John would go on to renounce Magna Carta. And got the Pope’s approval to not honor the promises he made with the barons. But these barons sowed the seeds of representative government in England. And the Western World. Greatly influencing the Founding Fathers in America. Whose Constitution placed great limits on the government’s power.
The Americans were having some problems with their Articles of Confederation. The sovereign states were taking care of themselves. Sometimes at the expense of the other states. Or the new nation. And the new nation wasn’t making much progress in the international community. A bit of a laughing stock to other nations. Who were all sure it was only a matter of time before the American colonies would be British again. For once the war was over there was little united about the states anymore. So James Madison urged a meeting of the several states to revise the Articles of Confederation. To help make a more perfect union. And to move the new nation forward. They met in Philadelphia in 1787. And caused a firestorm. For they didn’t revise the Articles. They threw them away. And wrote a brand new Constitution.
This inflamed a lot of the Patriots of 1776. Who had voted to sever the bonds from a distant central power about a decade earlier. And they were none too keen on creating a new central power to replace the one they just banished. It took awhile but with the presence of George Washington and some words from Benjamin Franklin, two of the most trusted and experienced Americans who sacrificed a lot in securing their independence, they completed their task. It wasn’t a perfect document. But it was the best they were ever going to produce considering the sectional differences in the country. And they sent it to the states for ratification. James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and John Jay helped to secure ratification by writing a series of articles that we know today as the Federalist Papers. Some of the finest Constitutional scholarship ever written.
As Few as Five People in Black Robes can Fundamentally Change the Nation
Key to the Constitution was the separation of powers that restricted the power of the new federal government that no one trusted. There was a legislature to write law. An executive branch to enforce law. And a judicial branch to interpret law. To make sure that the other two branches did not violate the Constitution. Such a system would have really crimped King John’s style. For the law was above all the people. Including the executive. He could only do the things the laws allowed him to do. And the things the laws allowed him to do he could only do if the legislature agreed to pay for them. It was a system of checks and balances that helped the nation to grow while maintaining personal liberty.
King John would have been particularly irked by the legislature. Made up by representatives of the people. Who enacted legislation that was in the best interest of the people. Not him. Fast forward to modern times and you find history littered with people who wanted to expand their power only to have that representative body of the people foil them. Ruling elites. Modern aristocrats. Those who feel an entitlement due to a superior education. A superior bloodline. Or simply like-minded people who would rather have the days of unlimited power like they had in Medieval Europe. Before the barons had to muck up the works with Magna Carta.
Over time they learned how to bring back some of the old ways. The easiest way was just to get people to vote for them. And they did this by giving them a lot of free stuff. But there were some things that they just couldn’t bribe out of the people. So they turned to the courts. And did a little legislating with activist judges. Sometimes bringing a suit all the way to the Supreme Court to create a law where there was no law. Abortion is now legal even though there was never any federal legislation addressing it. While there was plenty of state legislation forbidding it. Until seven men in black robes overruled the will of the people in those states.
The Supreme Court is powerful. For as few as five people in black robes can fundamentally change the nation. Which is why presidential elections are so important. Because presidents nominate judges to the Supreme Court. And those on the Left depend on the timely deaths and/or retirements of Supreme Court judges so they can nominate activist judges. To get a majority on the high court to rule in their favor on bad law. Such as Obamacare. An unpopular law. A law the majority of the people want repealed. A law that became law only with subterfuge (the mandate is not a tax). A law that clearly violated the Constitution (forcing people to buy something). Yet five people in black robes just fundamentally changed the nation by voting that Obamacare was Constitutional (the mandate is a tax). Which just goes to show you that where there is a will there is a way. A way to rule like a king. Against the will of the people.
Tags: activist judges, Articles of Confederation, barons, black robes, central power, Constitution, constitutional monarchy, courts, distant central power, England, executive, judges, judicial, King John, kingdoms, kings, landowners, law, legislation, legislature, liberals, Madison, Magna Carta, mandate, medieval kings, Obamacare, Patriots of 1776, representative government, Supreme Court, Supreme Court judges, taxes, wealth, wealthy landowners, will of the people
The Founding Fathers’ Experiment in Self-Government
Benjamin Franklin said when the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic. Because people tend to be greedy. And lazy. And they don’t understand public finance. Especially the uneducated ones. And there were a lot of uneducated people during our founding. The Founding Fathers worried about this. Because governments past have always exploited the uneducated for personal gain. Kings and lords would give the poor some alms to make them feel good about their lives of unending toil and suffering on the feudal estates. Should you not be lucky enough to have been born with the ‘right’ last name. The new United States of America was going to change that. Here it wouldn’t matter who your father was. Here, no one would be better than you.
But only if this experiment in self-government succeeded. So they were very careful when they wrote the Constitution. And the type of government for the new nation would not be a democracy. Instead, they chose a representative republic. For the Founding Fathers all feared democracies. Which when you come down to it is nothing more than mob rule. If the mob is racists they’ll pass racist laws. If the mob is sexist, they’ll pass sexist laws. And if the mob is greedy and lazy, they’ll vote themselves money from the federal treasury. This is the risk of democracy. All you need is a majority. And whatever you want is yours. No matter how destructive it is to the country.
That’s why the Founding Fathers did NOT give us a democracy. We have intermediaries between the mob and the actual law-making. We call these people our representatives. At the founding, these were the best of the best. Well educated and/or experienced. Men of great honor and integrity. Imbued with a selfless sense of duty. These men went out of their way NOT to prosper from their government service. Really. It’s nothing at all like today where government service is nothing more than a ticket to a fat pension and early retirement. Back then such a thought was anathema to the Founding Fathers. Which is very evident by the type of government they created.
Indirect Elections temper the Populist Tendencies
The Constitutional Convention was a hot, miserable, long summer in Philadelphia. There was little agreement. No one liked the final product much. But most agreed it was the best that they could do. Even then the U.S. was big. Lots of different people trying to make the final product favor their state more than the others. And few were in favor of giving the new central government much power. They all feared that this new central power would consolidate its power. And regulate the states to fiefdoms in a new kingdom. Just like in the Old World. So they took as many opportunities to restrict federal power. And minimize the influence of the populist mob.
The new federal government was a limited government. It was only to do the things the states couldn’t do well. Maintain an army and navy. Treat with other nations. Those things that needed a singular national identity. Everything else was to remain with the states. And to make sure the states would not lose their sovereignty, the states’ legislators would choose their federal senators. The House of Representatives would have direct elections. Being the closest to true democracy, the House risked being influenced by the mob. The Senate, then, would be wise and prudent to temper the populist tendencies of the House. To keep the House from doing something stupid. Like voting the people the treasury. (Of course, the states lost a lot their sovereignty when we changed this by amendment to a popular vote like the House.)
The president was to be elected indirectly, too. Like the senators. The Founders were worried that the office of the president could be easily corrupted. So they put great restrictions on its powers. And made it as difficult as possible for any one group or interest to ‘cheat’ and get their man into office. Hence the indirect election. Again, to protect their sovereignty, this fell to the states. State legislatures would choose electors who would then vote for president. (With quite a few close elections, there have been calls to eliminate the Electoral College and replace it with a pure popular vote. Of course, it is usually the loser in a close election who wants this change. If the same thing happens in a subsequent close election where they win they are quite happy with the Electoral College.)
Talented People create things to trade
The reason the Founders wanted so many people between the voters and the actual law-making is to keep people from voting irresponsibly. The federal budget is pretty big. And people see that it is big. They figure that because they pay taxes, there’s no reason why they can’t have stuff from the federal government. In a true democracy, the people could vote to cut taxes and increase spending. They could vote themselves a monthly stipend to live on and quit their jobs. An uneducated mob can easily do this. Who wouldn’t want to get a paycheck for doing nothing AND pay less in taxes? It’s very attractive. If I ran for office on such a platform a lot of people would probably vote for me. But there’s a problem with such generosity. You see, government can’t give money to people unless they take money from other people first.
There appears to be a popular misconception about public finance. Many believe that government has a stash of cash that they can give out whenever they please. And that this stash of cash has mystical power. That it’s endless. And when they give it away more just magically appears. But the government has no money. The public treasury isn’t filled with the government’s money. It’s filled with our money. That’s our tax dollars in there. Or it’s borrowed money. Borrowed money that costs interest. Paid with our tax dollars. Or it’s printed money. Money created out of nothing. Which makes our money worth less. Which makes everything we buy more expensive. We call this inflation. You just can’t print money. Because it just dilutes the purchasing power of the money already in circulation. It’s like a bartender selling you whisky from a bottle that’s one part water and 4 parts whisky. It not only tastes bad. But you’ll have to pay more to get the same buzz from an honest bartender.
The reason why printing money doesn’t work? Because it isn’t the money we want. It’s the things that money can buy that we want. Who sits in an empty room and enjoys looking at big piles of cash? No one. Take the cash out of your wallet or purse and see how long you can stare at it. Probably not long. Why? Because it’s boring. We don’t enjoy the cash. We enjoy the things in the room we trade that cash for. And this is key. We trade. We are traders. Always have been. And always will be. We started out bartering for things. You traded something you built (this is important) for something someone else built (equally important). Talented people who created things met to trade. And we still do this today. The money just makes it easier to trade. But this would not be possible if we all lived on a government stipend and nobody worked. Because if no one worked, there would be no things to buy. We would be sitting in an empty room staring at piles of useless money.
A Public Educational System that doesn’t Educate but Indoctrinates
The Founding Fathers understood all of this. And they framed the Constitution accordingly. They limited the powers of the federal government. Minimized the amount of actual democracy/mob rule. And minimized the amount of money in the federal treasury. For they were capitalists. They knew money left in the private sector stimulated local economies. People created useful things. Brought them to market. And traded these useful things for other useful things. That’s the way things were. It’s not how they are now. Politicians today are in politics for personal gain. They pander to the voters. Buy and sell favors. Enrich themselves in the process. And leave a swath of destruction in their wake. And how are they able to do this? Because the government has become more of a democracy than a representative republic.
Along the way the educational system failed. Probably starting in the Sixties. With the hippies in college. Who went on to teach in the Seventies. We spent less time on reading, ‘riting and ‘rithmetic. And more on American white guilt for what happened to the Native Americans and a slave economy. We learned less about the Founding Fathers. And more about the people they wronged. We learned less about American culture and more about diversity and multiculturalism. We learned less about American Exceptionalism and more about American Imperialism. We learned less about Western Civilization and more about ‘enlightened’ oppressive socialism. We learned less about capitalism and more about the ‘fair’ redistribution of wealth. Let’s face it. Kids in school didn’t have a chance. Their teachers were no longer teaching how America got to be exceptional. They were teaching that America was anything but exceptional. That we were guilty of every crime and injustice you could think of. That America needed to change. And that they, the young, our future, could make that change happen.
So the dumbing down of America began. For those unable to escape the indoctrination of the new public education. And the growth of government took off. In fact, you can say that as society became ‘less American’ they became more dependent on government. Where once rugged individualists dominated the land their numbers are thinning. As slick politicians lure more people by the siren song of an easy life provided by government benefits. And these politicians find the lie easier to sell with a public educational system that doesn’t educate but indoctrinates. In fact, it’s quite an incestuous relationship. The politicians spend more and more money on education. The money goes to the teachers. The teachers belong to unions. The teachers’ unions support and donate to Democrat candidates. So some of that tax money spent on education goes right back to the politicians that just increased educational spending. And the teachers, eager to keep a good thing going, teach their students to become good Democrat voters. Instead of teaching them about the three Rs, the Founding Fathers, American culture, American Exceptionalism, Western Civilization and capitalism. As the standardized test scores show. And does their irresponsible voting.
A Rising Sun or a Setting Sun
America is fast approaching a crossroads. People have learned that they can vote themselves money. And have. Politicians are pandering to these people for personal gain. Offering to spend more and more money that we just don’t have. Bringing us closer and closer to the end of the republic.
Ben Franklin sat through that insufferable summer in Philadelphia. Swatted at the giant horseflies in the hall. He was old and his time was short. He sat quietly during much of the debates. Often staring at the sun carved into George Washington‘s chair. He wondered if it was a rising sun. Or a setting sun. He saw it as symbolic of their little experiment in self-government and the work they were doing in that hall. Was this already the end of their noble experiment? Or was it just the beginning? After the delegates voted to send the new Constitution to the states for ratification he breathed a sigh of relief. For it was a rising sun.
I guess that question is once again open to debate.
Tags: America, American exceptionalism, Ben Franklin, Benjamin Franklin, Big Government, capitalists, central government, central power, Constitution, Constitutional Convention, democracy, education, educational spending, educational system, Electoral College, federal budget, federal government, federal power, federal treasury, Founders, Founding Fathers, House of Representatives, indirect election, indoctrinates, limited government, Mob rule, money, Philadelphia, popular vote, populist mob, populist tendencies, president, printing money, public education, public finance, public treasury, representative republic, representatives, self-government, Senate, Senators, sovereignty, state legislatures, tax dollars, teachers, teachers' unions, trade, treasury, United States, voting, voting irresponsibly, Western Civilization