Turning People into Potheads is Good for Colorado’s Treasury

Posted by PITHOCRATES - March 15th, 2014

Week in Review

First it was alcohol and tobacco.  Getting people hooked on these items to solve all of a state’s funding woes.  Then it was the lottery.  States needed to get their people hooked on gambling to solve all of their school funding needs.  Then it was casino gambling.  Because the lottery alone was taking enough money from the people to solve all of a state’s funding woes.  And now it’s marijuana (see Colorado made $3.5 million in taxes and fees on first month of marijuana sales by Nick Allen posted 3/11/2014 on The Telegraph).

Colorado, the first US state to legalise cannabis for recreational use, made just over $2 million in tax revenue from selling the drug in January, according to its first officially released figures.

The amount was not far behind the $2.7 million the state recouped in excise taxes on alcohol in the same period and is expected to exceed that in subsequent months.

More than $14 million worth of the dug was sold over counters to recreational users in the 30 days after cannabis shops opened on Jan 1…

In Colorado the first $40 million in tax revenue will go towards school construction and Mr Hickenlooper wants additional revenue to be used for projects including anti-drug advertising aimed at children, campaigns against driving under the influence of cannabis, and public health projects.

Another $2 million taken away from the taxpayers.  To add to the $2.7 million from alcohol sales.  On top of what they got from tobacco sales.  And what they got from the lottery.  Each step down this road was supposed to be a cure-all.  But it never was.  For once they got a new tax it wasn’t long before they said they needed yet another new tax.  Because the previous tax just wasn’t adequate to cover their spending.  Which just begs the question.  What are they doing with all of that money?

So we have people dying from lung cancer.  We have people dying from liver disease.  We have people becoming impoverished because they’ve gambled all of their money away.  Now Colorado is going to turn a part of their population into potheads.  Who will suffer the same ailments as tobacco smokers do.  As well as suffering some lost cognitive ability.  And some will end up wards of the state.  Filling hospitals and nursing homes.  Suffering from costly diseases. And yet the state cheers this new money.  And dreams of future revenue as more people pick up this unhealthy and dangerous habit.  Giddy at the thought of every new person lighting a marijuana cigarette for the first time.

The worst thing about the state using these people to fund their out of control spending is the regressive nature of these taxes.  Alcohol, tobacco, the lottery, casino gambling and marijuana hurt the poor the most.  Those who have the least money to spare now have to give more of it to the taxing authority.  The very people these progressive-thinking people are supposed to help.  Who instead use them for their selfish needs.  And don’t care a whit about the lives they destroy.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Philip Seymour Hoffman was Found Dead Today from an Apparent Drug Overdose

Posted by PITHOCRATES - February 2nd, 2014

Week in Review

Philip Seymour Hoffman was found dead today from an apparent drug overdose.  Sad.  Such a great talent.  The characters he brought to life helped us escape from our troubles for a couple of hours.  He could be a bit of a curmudgeon in real life, though.  But a warmth shone through the characters he played.  He worked hard to polish his craft.  And he was a natural.  Likeable.  Even if you didn’t like the movie he was in you enjoyed seeing him in it.  It is so sad that drugs have taken yet another great talent from us (see Philip Seymour Hoffman Found Dead at 46 by Jenny Depper posted 2/2/2014 on Yahoo! Movies).

Academy Award winner Philip Seymour Hoffman was found dead in his New York City apartment on Sunday. He was 46.

The New York City Police Department  confirmed to “The Insider With Yahoo” that the actor was found dead at 12 p.m. ET in his fourth floor apartment in the Greenwich Village of New York City.

While the official cause of death is still unknown at this point, police speculate that he may have died of a drug overdose. The actor was found with a needle in his arm and apparent heroin was found at the scene…

Hoffman had struggled with addiction in the past, but was reportedly clean for 23 years before falling off the wagon in 2012. He most recently checked into rehab in May 2013.

In a 2006 interview with CBS’ “60 Minutes,” Hoffman discussed his earlier drug use dating back to the time after his graduation from New York University’s drama school.

“It was all that [drugs and alcohol], yeah, it was anything I could get my hands on… I liked it all,” Hoffman said. Eventually, he chose to seek treatment. “I went [to rehab], I got sober when I was 22 years old. You get panicked… and I got panicked for my life. It really was just that.”

He also revealed that his drug habit was life-threatening. “I have so much empathy for these young actors that are 19 and all of a sudden they’re beautiful and famous and rich. I’m like, ‘Oh my God. I’d be dead.’ You know what I mean? I’d be 19, beautiful, famous and rich. That would be it. I think back at that time. I think if I had the money, that kind of money and stuff. So, yeah [I would have died].”

Every time there is another death caused by a firearm the left screams for new gun control legislation.  But when a great talent dies from a drug overdose you hear no cry from the left for new drug control legislation.  No.  Instead they celebrate Colorado and Washington for decriminalizing recreational marijuana.  Because, as the left says, marijuana is safer than alcohol.

But making marijuana more readily available will only make more kids start using it.  Just as it made out-of-state college applications explode in those two states.  Because these kids want to get high.  And will get high.  For the more readily available marijuana is the more they will get high.  Developing new drug habits.  And then, perhaps, moving on to something stronger.  Like heroin.  Which Hoffman didn’t start with.  But he ended with.  And no doubt more will.  Because while the left calls for new gun control legislation whenever anyone dies by a firearm they have no problem with people developing drug habits.  They even encourage it with pushing for the decriminalization of marijuana for recreational use.  The drug pretty much everyone who ever died from a drug overdose started with.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

British Mother-of-Three dies from Cannabis Poisoning

Posted by PITHOCRATES - February 1st, 2014

Week in Review

In the movie Leaving Las Vegas Nicholas Cage’s character, Ben Sanderson, commits suicide by alcohol poisoning.  Cage won the Academy award for his performance.  For his painful, long death was intense.  And painful to watch.  Making death by alcohol wretched to say the least.  For it takes a long time to drink yourself to death.  Unlike death by marijuana (see Mother thought to be first woman in Britain to die from cannabis poisoning by News agencies posted 1/30/2014 on The Telegraph).

A mother-of-three is believed to have become the first woman in Britain to die directly from cannabis poisoning.

Gemma Moss, a 31-year-old churchgoer, collapsed in bed after smoking a cannabis cigarette that led her to have moderate to high levels of the class B drug in her system…

Deaths directly from cannabis are highly unusual. In 2004 a 36-year-old man from Pembrokeshire became the first person in the UK to die from cannabis toxicity…

“Cannabis is know[n] to increase heart rate and blood pressure. Cannabis these days is designed to be much stronger than cannabis used in the sixties to meet demand of users who want a stronger hit.”

Miss Moss, a devout Christian, had frequently used cannabis during her adult life but had stopped for two years before her death last October.

She started using it again to help her sleep after becoming depressed and anxious due to breaking up with her boyfriend.

An inquest heard Miss Moss smoked half a joint a night to help get her to sleep.

Her friend, Zara Hill, said she and Miss Moss smoked about £20-[$32.86] worth of cannabis together in the week before her death.

Miss Hill told police that Miss Moss smoked as much as £60 [$98.58]…worth of the drug a week, although this was disputed by her family…

“She was a healthy 31-year-old woman who had nothing wrong with her.”

Poor Ben Sanderson drank morning, noon and night.  And suffered terrible withdrawals when he wasn’t drinking.  Near the end of his life his hand shook so much he couldn’t sign his name.  Though it was only a movie it portrayed what severe alcoholism can do to you.  Had he only drank like this woman smoked marijuana (only a ‘half portion’ at night) he would not have died the horrible death he died.  But cannabis is growing so strong these days that a ‘half portion’ can kill a healthy 31-year-old woman who’s just trying to relax a little so she can sleep.

So much for the argument that marijuana is safer than alcohol.  And that’s without considering the health effects of that first, second and third-hand smoke in people’s lungs.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , ,

Governments turn People into Addicts to generate Tax Revenue

Posted by PITHOCRATES - January 4th, 2014

Week in Review

During the days of the British Empire Great Britain had a problem.  They loved Chinese tea.  But the British had nothing the Chinese wanted in trade.  Except for one thing.  Silver.  Hard money.  Which was a problem for Britain.  They were running out of hard money.  So they came up with an ingenious way to solve that problem.  By getting as many Chinese hooked on opium as possible.  So they could trade Indian grown opium for Chinese tea.  It worked out great for the British.  But the Chinese didn’t like it.  And fought two opium wars with the British.  Which did not end well for them.

North Korea has a hard money problem, too.  And they, too, turned to drugs.  Crystal meth.  Which North Korea manufactured in state-run labs.  Destined for China.  Where they tried to get as many people addicted to crystal meth as possible.  So they can sell it in exchange for Chinese currency.  Which they could use to buy Chinese food.  To help ward off famine in North Korea.  This worked pretty well for North Korea.  But only gave China another addiction problem.

In the United States the government found other ways to raise revenue.  The first two big sources of addiction-revenue were cigarette and alcohol taxes.  But it soon proved not enough.  They then got people addicted to playing the lottery.  When that revenue proved to be insufficient they then got people addicted to casino gambling.  But government spending had grown so great that this revenue was still not enough.  So the government is looking at other things to get people addicted to (see Why Legalizing Marijuana Is a Smart Fiscal Move by Bruce Bartlett, The Fiscal Times, posted 1/3/2014 on Yahoo! News).

Perhaps the dominant factor driving marijuana legalization is the desperate search for new revenue by cash-strapped state governments. The opportunity to tax marijuana is potentially a significant source of new revenue, as well as a way of cutting spending on prisons and law enforcement. The California Secretary of State’s office, for example, estimates savings in the hundreds of millions of dollars from both factors. The following summary is from a proposed state ballot initiative in California (No. 1617)…

It is not surprising that revenue considerations should be critical in the marijuana legalization movement. That was previously the reason why cigarettes were not banned until the 1920s despite a strong nationwide movement to do so. In the wake of Prohibition, governments simply needed cigarette tax revenue too badly. And when Prohibition ended, the need for new revenue after the Great Depression decimated government budgets was a driving force.

Indeed, according to author Daniel Okrent, expectations of the revenue from taxing legal liquor were so great in 1932 that some people thought it might permit the repeal of income taxes. It’s worth remembering that in 1900, taxes on alcohol and cigarettes constituted half of all federal revenues. Indeed, the only reason Prohibition was possible in the first place was that the income tax established in 1913, which was greatly expanded by World War I, would replace the revenue lost from the liquor tax after Prohibition.

There have been no great cuts to revenue like that following Prohibition.  Government spending has just grown so great that it far exceeds the nation’s ability to pay for it with current taxes and borrowing.  So they are looking to make people addicted to marijuana to help pay for their large public sectors.  As well as their vote-buying welfare state.  And when this proves insufficient they can turn to other sources of revenue.  Such as decriminalizing and taxing heroin.  Cocaine.  Crack.  Crystal meth.  Opium.  Even prostitution.  People are already doing these things.  So they can’t be any worse than marijuana.  As long as only responsible adults indulge in these activities.  Just as only responsible adults will smoke marijuana in Colorado.  For think of the tax revenue heroin, cocaine, crack, crystal meth and opium could generate.  For those drugs are really addictive.  And just think how much old rich men would enjoy 18 year old prostitutes.  Prostitution would be a booming business to tax.  These young women could generate great tax revenue for the government by just doing what consenting adults want to do.

We could do these things to find new sources of revenue.  Or we could NOT make people addicts.  Or NOT sell women into prostitution.  Instead we could cut the size of the public sector and the welfare state.  So we can cut spending.  Which would eliminate the need to produce new tax revenue in the first place.  Allowing people to keep their hard-earned money instead of handing it over to the government.  To pay for generous pensions and retiree health care for others.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Left says Smoking Cigarettes and Drinking Alcohol are bad for you but Smoking Marijuana is OK

Posted by PITHOCRATES - December 28th, 2013

Week in Review

You hear it all the time.  Smoking marijuana is no worse than drinking alcohol.  So we should decriminalize it everywhere.  And allow responsible adults smoke marijuana if they choose.  While at the same time they have banned smoking cigarettes just about everywhere outside of your own home.  Because smoking will kill you.  And anyone near you.  Funny how smoking cigarettes will kill you and anyone near you while smoking marijuana is no worse than enjoying a refreshing adult beverage.

What’s even funnier is that as they continue to make statements like smoking marijuana is no worse than drinking alcohol they are ramping up a war on alcohol.  As drinking alcohol is killing people at record numbers (see Raising the price of booze saves lives and money. Scotland is right to try it posted 12/21/2013 on The Economist).

AMONG man’s earliest artefacts are vessels to store and carry booze. Drunk from Stone Age jugs or Etruscan amphoras, fermented sugars have brought cheer for more than 12,000 years. And headaches too: alcohol stokes rage and gloom as well as jollity and dancing. For liberal-minded types, the downsides are a personal matter—we should be free to frolic.

Within limits. Where the harm extends beyond the individual, there is a case for intervention. Global alcohol consumption is stable. But some people are tippling more, in ways that hurt themselves and others (see article).

At stake are not just vomit-drenched streets. Deaths linked to drinking have tripled since 1990; in that time alcohol has gone from the sixth to the third leading cause of death and disability worldwide. The bill lands on everyone, as does booze-fuelled violence. Including lost output, the harm from alcohol costs Europe and America around 1.5% of national income.

The problem is worsening. Across the rich world, a small share of the population consumes a large share of the liquor. One reason is that many young people have upped their intake. More drinkers are also bingeing—even in southern Europe, where alcohol used to be taken mainly with food…

The best way to tackle excessive drinking is to raise prices through taxes levied on a drink’s strength, so that the most harmful drinks are more expensive. The resulting price-rise should cut the consumption of hard-up heavy topers (who are particularly partial to dirt-cheap supermarket booze) and young drinkers, who can afford only what’s cheap…

Public-health laws often require an unpopular move at the start, but new habits and attitudes can take root surprisingly quickly. A ban on smoking in restaurants and pubs seemed outlandish—until New York City introduced one in 2003. Much of the world quickly followed suit. Even diehard liberals like this newspaper, queasy at first about smoking bans, or mandatory crash helmets and seat belts, would hesitate to scrap those regulations now.

We are drinking ourselves to death three times as much as we were in the 1990s.  And one reason why is that young people are drinking more.  In fact many of the binge drinkers are young people.  It is less uncommon to read about a binge-drinking related death on a college campus.  It’s not happening all of the time but there are deaths.  And sexual assaults.

Getting a woman drunk has long been a prelude to sex.  That’s what singles’ bars were for.  Drinking to lower a woman’s inhibitions.  To get her to go home with a strange man for consensual sex.  But at a party on a college campus?  There’s no need to go home.  For there is always a bedroom or a couch or a floor available in a fraternity house, apartment or dorm room.  And young men with raging hormones in a sexualized culture will take advantage of a passed out college coed.  Even doing terrible things to her as she lay unconscious.  Or getting a video of her while she’s still conscious doing things she’d never do sober.  And posting it online.  Causing great pain and suffering for the girl.

Smoking marijuana will be no different than people enjoying alcohol.  So we should decriminalize it.  For what bad thing ever happened from enjoying alcohol?

Marijuana is a young person’s intoxicant.  We’ve all seen the stoner movies where high school teachers have to deal with stoners.  Like Jeff Spicoli in Fast Times at Ridgemont High.  And this was when the drug was illegal everywhere in the United States.  Imagine the Jeff Spicolis when the drug is decriminalized everywhere.  While being more potent than ever.  If new habits and new attitudes can take root surprisingly quickly then existing habits and attitudes and law should be just as easy to remain rooted.  Especially for marijuana.  For it combines the reckless abandon of youths to over consume like alcohol.  And the harmful effects of smoking cigarettes.

Would the left sacrifice our young just to get their vote?  Yes.  Of course they will.  And are.  For do you really think they care if these people die after they grow up and begin acting—and voting—responsibly?

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Relying on Technology in lieu of Teaching our Kids to be Responsible Adults

Posted by PITHOCRATES - November 30th, 2013

Week in Review

There was an episode of Madmen showing Don Draper spending an afternoon drinking beer while working on a present for his daughter.  Then his wife said he had to go pick up the birthday cake.  He was not happy about this.  But poured himself a drink and left anyway.  Taking his glass of bourbon into the car.  And drinking from this glass while driving.

This is only a television show.  But a television show noted for its accurate portrayal of life in the 1960s.  People drank.  And drove.  With some crawling from their car to their front door because they were too drunk to walk.  And life went on.   Teenagers watched driver’s education films like Red Asphalt.  And still became Don Drapers.  Despite all that gore.  To this day we still drink and drive.  Well, for a little while more, at least (see Auto safety initiative seeks to reduce driver errors by Jerry Hirsch posted 11/29/2013 on the Los Angeles Times).

Auto safety regulators are pushing for new equipment to protect motorists from their biggest threat: themselves.

They’re aiming to keep drunk drivers off the road with the help of onboard technology that immobilizes their cars…

Now NHTSA and a coalition of 17 automakers are working on the so-called Driver Alcohol Detection System for Safety. The DADDS system uses sensors in the cabin to measure blood-alcohol content by breath or touch to ensure a driver is below the legal 0.08% threshold for impairment…

But some have reservations about these high-tech minders. The restaurant lobby opposes what it sees as an encroaching nanny state. Some analysts predict the equipment could add hundreds of dollars to the cost of each vehicle. And even some car enthusiasts say that imperfect technology could alienate the public it’s supposed to protect.

Jack Nerad, an analyst with auto information company Kelley Blue Book, imagined a scenario in which sensors picked up alcohol on the breath of passengers, preventing the designated driver from getting them home.

“You are reliant on the technology to be 100% perfect or your car doesn’t start,” he said. “That makes people very, very angry…”

Mistaken alcohol readings or faulty seat-belt sensors could put motorists in harm’s way if they’re stranded during emergencies or in remote places.

Where the DADDS system will set the blood alcohol limit could also prove contentious.

NHTSA says it will be the .08% level at which a driver is legally considered impaired, a ceiling that is supported by Mothers Against Drunk Driving…

But a slightly higher limit might leave a margin of error that reduces false positives without greatly increasing the frequency of drunk-driving crashes, said Clarence Ditlow, executive director of the Center for Auto Safety.

The majority of people who were killed in drunk-driving crashes last year were in collisions in which a driver had double the legal limit, according to NHTSA data…

“We are opposed to mandating this technology on all cars as original equipment,” said Sarah Longwell, managing director of the American Beverage Institute, a restaurant trade association. “You are not going to solve the drunk-driving problem, which is a small, hard-core population of offenders, by treating everybody like a criminal.”

She said drinkers could find ways to evade the technology. For example, they could quickly throw down some shots and already be on the road by the time their blood-alcohol level crosses the .08% limit.

“And then what is going to happen?” Longwell asked. “If you crash your car and you are well above the legal limit, can you sue the manufacturer? Who has the liability?”

Good point.  Who do you sue?  The bartender for serving the shots?  But why should the bartender worry about a patron’s sobriety when his or her car won’t start if this person is too drunk?  Which would be great for the drinking industry.  No more worries about someone leaving too drunk to drive.  Because the car will determine that.  So while the bartender may have cut them off after 3-4 shots there is no reason to cut them off at all now.  Because their car won’t start if this person is too drunk to drive.  So you can’t really hold the drinking establishment responsible.  For the new technology takes on that responsibility.

So do you sue the car manufacturer?  They’ll blame the American Beverage Institute who lobbied against the 0.08% limit.  Saying that raising it to such a high level (something above 0.08%) that it didn’t detect the drunkenness of the driver until after they started their car and entered traffic.  Will they require a time lapse between the driver’s last drink and the time they can try starting the engine?  A link between the bar’s POS system and the car?  This would be ridiculous.  Add more costs to a car.  And add more technology that can be ‘not perfect’.

What happens if some rowdy men spill a drink on a woman in a bar.  Who then leaves the bar.  But cannot start her car because of the alcohol spilled on her?  And then the rowdy men follow her to the parking lot.  And proceed to smash her windows to get at her.  While she can’t do anything because her car won’t start.  And they rape her.  Who gets sued then?

They used to hang horse thieves in the old West.  Because if you stole a man’s horse you put his life in great danger.  A car is the modern day horse.  Something you depend on getting you home safely.  And it is so reliable that we never imagine it not getting us home.  But now your car may strand you.  Leaving you to the dangers surrounding you.  And it may cause you to abandon your drunken friends to find their own way home.  Because you don’t want to take any chances your car won’t start.  By having their drunken asses in the car with you preventing you from getting home.

Of course it begs the question.  What will they do to protect us from people texting and driving?  Which has surpassed drinking and driving as a greater danger?  Technology that shuts off your engine whenever it detects a cell phone in use?  Imagine someone turning on their cell phone when you’re in a center lane on a limited access expressway.   Shutting off your engine.  And your power steering.  While you desperately make your way to the shoulder during rush hour traffic.

Perhaps we need a little less technology and a little more Red Asphalt.  For many of our problems would go away if we would only teach people to be responsible.  Instead of relying on technology to protect us from the irresponsibility of others.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Prescription Pain Killers and Marijuana are the two most Abused Drugs in America

Posted by PITHOCRATES - October 20th, 2013

Week in Review

Those who wish to decriminalize marijuana say only responsible adults will smoke it.  Just as only responsible adults smoke cigarettes.  And drink alcohol.  These are products that are legal only for adults.  So no kids use them.  Well, in theory, at least.  For with these being legal for adults makes it very easy for kids to get them.  Which is why so many high school kids smoke cigarettes and binge drink.  But that won’t happen with marijuana.  Or so say the heavy smokers of marijuana.  But cigarettes and alcohol are not the only legal products kids are getting their hands on (see The Dark Side Of America’s Rush Into Prescription Drugs Has Never Been More Obvious by Erin Fuchs posted 10/17/2013 on Business Insider).

The number of people in America who died from taking prescription pain killers quadrupled between 1999 and 2010, a new report from the Trust for America’s Health says.

These fatalities now outnumber deaths from heroin and cocaine combined, that same report found. More than 12 million people said they abused prescription drugs in 2010. The only other drug people abuse more is marijuana, the White House noted in a 2011 report.

More people die from prescription pain killers than they do from heroin and cocaine combined.  These prescription pain killers are legal.  Making it easy for kids to get their hands on them.  Even if you need a prescription.  Imagine how much worse this problem would be if you didn’t need a prescription.  If you could just walk in off the street and buy them.  Like they want to do with marijuana.  The only drug abused more than prescription pain killers.

If the abuse of prescription pain killers is bad and marijuana is abused more than prescription pain killers then perhaps we shouldn’t be decriminalizing marijuana.  Even if keeping marijuana illegal just saves one kid’s life.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , ,

Cory Monteith is another Victim in the Democrat’s War on the Young

Posted by PITHOCRATES - October 5th, 2013

Week in Review

Cory Monteith’s death is a warning.  Kids should listen to their parents more.  And to the Democrats less (see ‘Glee’ actor Corey Monteith died of heroin, alcohol mix by JEREMY HAINSWORTH, Associated Press, posted 10/2/2013 on The Kansas City Star).

The British Columbia Coroners Service said Wednesday investigators found a spoon with drug residue and a used hypodermic needle in the hotel room where “Glee” actor Cory Monteith was found dead in July.

The coroner’s final report issued Wednesday, confirmed initial findings that Monteith died from using intravenous heroin combined with alcohol…

The investigation said Monteith had a history of illicit drug use with intermittent periods of rehabilitation and of abstinence from drugs…

His death recalled the lives of Heath Ledger, Corey Haim and River Phoenix — actors who battled substance abuse and died in their 20s and 30s.

Monteith had talked bluntly about struggling with addiction since he was a teenager, calling it a serious problem and telling Parade magazine in 2011 he was “lucky to be alive.”

In that interview, he said he was using marijuana and drinking by age 13, and his drug use was “out of control” by the time he was 16. “Anything and everything, as much as possible,” he said. “I had a serious problem.”

People always like to make a comparison between marijuana and alcohol.  That marijuana is no worse than alcohol.  But there is only one drunk.  While there are many highs.  With the next high always promising to be better than the last high.  Something we call chasing the dragon.  That often ends in overdoses.  And death.  Like in Monteith’s case.

Notice the drug Monteith started with.  Marijuana.  Which is why marijuana isn’t like alcohol.  Because there aren’t new ways of getting drunk when an old way of getting drunk bores you.  Not so with drugs.  Where amateurs and novices start off with marijuana.  Until it bores them.  Then they start looking for new highs.  Better highs.  Until one day they start injecting drugs of dubious origin into their veins.

People don’t start by injecting drugs of dubious origin into their veins.  That’s an experienced drug user.  Who worked their way up to heroin.  After starting with marijuana.  The very drug states are now starting to decriminalize.  While the federal government looks the other way.  If marijuana is no longer illegal more people are likely to try it.  Get bored with it.  And move on to other drugs.  Just like Monteith, Heath Ledger, Corey Haim and River Phoenix did.  And countless children whose deaths didn’t make it into the news.  With countless others soon to follow.

The young like the Democrats.  Because they are not their parents.  Instead of saying ‘no’ to sex and drugs the Democrats give out free birth control.  Resulting in an explosion of sexually transmitted diseases.  Especially among young girls.  Who will have to live with that for the rest of their lives.  Even when trying to find someone to marry and start a family with.  Which an STD doesn’t make easy.  While other girls become mothers before they leave high school.  Setting back any career plans they may have had as they can’t raise their children and go off to college.  While others get abortions.  Which some regret as they grow older.  Not all.  But those who do can’t stop thinking about the life that didn’t happen because of what they did.  When they made a decision as a child their grownup self regrets.  So the Democrats really mess up young people’s lives.  And if that damage wasn’t enough they are now making it easier to become a drug addict.  By making the number one gateway drug no longer illegal.

Democrats will do anything to secure the youth vote.  Even if they destroy their lives in the process.  Which they often do.  In fact, they’re destroying their entire generation with the debt they’re going to leave them.  While at the same time impoverishing them with Obamacare.  Where the young and healthy will pay for the health care of the old and sick.  Leaving them with little now.  And even less to save for their own retirement.  Making the Democrats young people’s worst enemy.  Yet the Democrats have fooled them into believing that they are their best friend.  Just goes to show you what you can do if you have no conscious.  Which is easier to do when you get rid of God everywhere.  For if there is no God what do you have to worry about in this life when you believe there is no afterlife?  Talk about your freedoms.  Freedom from empathy.  Something that comes in handy for a ruling class interested only in power.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

If Marijuana is Legal Kids will buy it off the Internet just as they buy Alcohol off the Internet

Posted by PITHOCRATES - July 6th, 2013

Week in Review

The American left has used the heavy hand of government to protect the children.  They’ve taken candy and chips out of school vending machines.  They put vegetables on their lunch plates (which our kids promptly throw away).  They’ve restricted smoking in all public areas.  Placed restrictions on second-hand smoke.  Even on third-hand smoke.  Some have tried to limit the size of soda they can buy.  The kind of toys they can play with.  Even the words they can say in school.  The left has made a police state for our children.  To protect them.  And to make sure they grow up and think correctly.

But they have not brought their jackbooted oppression of our children into one area.  Marijuana.  In their drive to allow medical marijuana—as well as simply decriminalizing marijuana just to get high on—they are strangely quiet when it comes to the children.  For apparently they can protect the children from marijuana just like they can protect them from alcohol (see Concern over teenagers buying alcohol via online shopping posted 7/1/2013 on BBC News Wales).

Young people are increasingly using online supermarket delivery services to buy alcohol, figures show.

A total of 21% of 14-15 year olds questioned for the Alcohol Concern Cymru Wales-wide survey said they had bought alcohol online…

Meanwhile, four out of nine under-age test purchasers working with police in Cardiff bought and received alcohol online in March…

In four of the nine cases (44%), alcohol was handed to the underage test purchasers by delivery drivers with no proof of age requested after agreeing to online terms and conditions when making the purchases.

Canada has medical marijuana.  But their pharmacies don’t want to dispense it.  And doctors don’t want to prescribe it.  As there are no drug studies with marijuana as there is with every other drug.  So they don’t know how to prescribe dosage.  And the pharmacies don’t want a highly demanded drug on site that people will want to steal.  So in Canada if you want your medical marijuana you will have to order it directly from the producer.  By phone.  Or over the Internet.  Making Canadian stoners very, very happy.

Once upon a time selling marijuana was a crime.  Which limited the number of people willing to sell it to kids.  But if it’s not a crime there will be a whole lot of people willing to sell it to kids over the Internet.  Especially when they can say, “They checked the box on the online order form stating they were of legal age.  What more could I have done.  Here’s my wrist.  Please slap it and go on your way.  For business is good and I have more orders to fill.  All of these orders, incidentally, are for adults.  Because they checked the box on the online order form.  So they have to be adults.  I mean, why would anyone lie about their age when buying marijuana?”

Our kids may not be able to play with a toy gun or eat a candy bar in school.  Thanks to the oppressive police state they live in.  Which strangely looks the other way when it comes to marijuana.  Even though it would be safer for our kids to enjoy a candy bar in school than smoking dope that they bought over the Internet.  Why?  Is it just to help them keep the youth vote?  For high school kids and college kids like smoking dope.  And vote Democrat.  Or is it because the left are nothing but a bunch of pot smokers themselves?  Funny for a group of people who have all but legislated cigarette smoking out of existence to have no problem with smoking marijuana.  Either way (the youth vote or their desire to get high) the left clearly have put their own desires above what’s best for our children.  Talk about your selfish bastards.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Australia has a Youth Drug Addiction problem with Children as Young as Twelve

Posted by PITHOCRATES - June 29th, 2013

Week in Review

Some in the U.S. say marijuana is no more dangerous than alcohol.  And support moves to decriminalize it.  Others say that if it’s legal our children may be more inclined to try it.  And then move on to harder drugs.  Preposterous say the proponents of marijuana.  The same arguments have been made against the repealing of Prohibition.

Of course, once you start drinking hard liquor there are no harder liquors to move on to.  For there is only one ‘drunk’.  And most kids find the taste of hard liquor icky.  Discouraging some from drinking.  Drugs, though, don’t taste icky.  And there are many different ‘highs’.  Where uses often seek out a better high with each drug-induced trip.  So there is a difference between drugs and alcohols.  And the more readily available drugs are the more kids will find a way to use them (see Online drug buys harm children – Gold Coast Bulletin News posted 6/25/2013 on The Australian Hub).

GOLD Coast children as young as 12 have been left crippled with psychotic episodes, paranoia and anxiety after taking synthetic drugs found on the internet…

“Some users end up with minor anxiety issues, while some have complete psychotic breakdowns,” she said.

Ms Morris, who rehabilitates children with drug problems, warned residents the city had a systemic problem with youth addiction.

“The transient nature of the Gold Coast means children are surrounded by party drugs and synthetics at a quite young age,” Ms Morris said.

“While the average age of our patients is around 15 or 16, we occasionally deal with children as young as 12.”

Her warnings come after 17-year-old Henry Kwan died earlier this month when he jumped from the third floor balcony of his family home in Killara, Sydney, while high on synthetic LSD…

“When young developing minds are exposed to the dangerous chemicals, the risk of long-term damage is increased.”

Youth addiction problem?  Children as young as 12?  Because they are surrounded by party drugs?  And can buy them on the Internet?  It would seem the more readily available drugs are the more likely kids will become addicts.  Die from an overdose.  Or jump out of a window while high on a hallucinogenic.  Something that just doesn’t happen with alcohol.  So there is a difference between alcohol and drugs.  And drugs are clearly more harmful to our children.  And truth be told they aren’t all that good for the adults either.

Decriminalizing marijuana won’t make these problems better.  They will only make them worse.  For it is a lot easier for children to get something that isn’t illegal.  Just look at the number of kids smoking cigarettes.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

« Previous Entries