Flying is so Safe already that to make it any Safer is nearly Statistically Impossible
Air travel is the safest way to travel. People are far more likely to die on the way to the airport than in an airplane. Air plane accidents and incidents are so rare these days that when one happens it is huge news. For weeks some networks devoted near 24/7 coverage of missing Malaysian Airlines Flight 370. Even though they had nothing to report. But that didn’t stop them from going to air to speculate about what happened. Because an airplane just disappearing like that is extremely rare.
The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigates aircraft accidents and incidents to determine the cause. And to come up with new ways to make aviation safer. But improving safety any more is getting difficult. And costly. They put a cost on the loss of life and compare that to the cost for the airlines (and the people who buy their tickets) to implement a proposed change. And then judge the likelihood that spending that money will actually save any lives. They could reduce the number of deaths from flying to zero simply by grounding all aircraft permanently. But the flying public wants to fly. And is apparently willing to fly even if there is a slim chance of dying.
When a plane crashes because of an event that is statistically likely to happen, say, one in 100 million flights it’s hard to justify the added expense. As that cost will not make flying any safer statistically. This is the problem with making flying safer today. It is so safe already that to make it any safer is nearly statistically impossible. And spending more resources to try and make it safe 100% of the time is just not possible. And it’s just too costly to try.
Racism is so Trivial in the Aggregate that it could not prevent a Black Child from growing up to be President
There are a lot of people on the left who say we need a dialogue on race. Because there is still racism in this country. Not Southern Democrat Jim Crowe racism. But systemic racism that stacks the deck against blacks. Despite that ‘racist’ America having elected a black president. Twice. Who appointed a black man as attorney general. Eric Holder. America’s top cop. This couldn’t have happened without a majority of white voters voting for President Obama. As blacks make up only approximately 13.1% of the population while whites make up approximately 77.9% (see United States Census QuickFacts).
So there may be some racism in America. But clearly not a lot of it. For if there was a lot of it there would have been enough people to vote against President Obama. But there wasn’t. And he won reelection. Even though his record wasn’t that good. On the economy. Or on national security. So there would have been a lot of reasons to vote against him. Especially if the American people were racist. But this didn’t happen. Suggesting that America is not as racist as those on the left would have you believe.
Sure, there is racism in America. As there is everywhere. And always will be. But is it systemic? Is it impossible for a black child to grow up to be the president of the United States? To be the top cop in the land? No. Because these things have happened. So is it necessary to focus the Justice Department only on racial injustice in the United States? Even those on the left will concede that things are a lot better now than they ever were. So should the Justice Department focus on removing the last vestiges of racism when if doing so will be very difficult if not impossible? As some people simply cannot be reasoned with? If these people were running the country perhaps it would be. But they’re not. These instances of racism are isolated incidents. So trivial in the aggregate that they could not prevent a black child growing up to be president.
Despite all of their Efforts to End Racism they haven’t reduced the Need to End Racism
A lot of people voted for President Obama to end racism once and for all. To move away from our racist past. But it seems like the left finds more racism than ever since President Obama’s election. In fact, they call any criticism of President Obama an act of racism. Making it difficult to criticize the president. As no one wants to be labeled a racist. In fact the left uses this to try and shut down debate over policy issues. Unable to defeat conservatives in the arena of ideas (as conservatives outnumber liberals 2-1) they are quick to try and shut down debate with charges of racism.
Even Attorney General Eric Holder responded angrily when testifying in Congress. Later when speaking to a mostly black audience he asked was there ever an attorney general or a president treated as poorly as he and President Obama? (Yes, there were. Especially when they were Republican). Implying that the people’s representatives, and, therefore, the people, were racist. So he can stand morally indignant as he stood in contempt of Congress. The victim. A lot in the media have come to his support. While few criticized him. Because no one wants to be called a racist. And because no one does it is a very powerful way to shift attention away from any wrongdoing by shifting the attention to those accusing you of said wrongdoing. A tactic right from the far-left strategist Saul Alinsky’s playbook (see Corrupt AG’s Feigned Outrage Shouldn’t Be Distraction posted 4/10/2014 on Investors.com).
The NTSB is trying to remove the last vestiges of air travel deaths. Which is more and more difficult to do these days as there are so few ways left to improve aviation safety. There are a lot of people trying to end racism. But if you listen to them the problem of racism has never been worse. Despite the success of President Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder. Who actually benefit from this perceived racism. As they can discount any criticism of them because they’re black. And the American people are racist. Despite these same American people being responsible for their success. For a country with a 77.9% white population could have been racist enough to prevent the election of a black president. And they were given two opportunities to show just how racist they are. But didn’t. Still, the charge of racism is a powerful weapon in their arsenal. Which is why despite all of their efforts to end racism they haven’t reduced the need to end racism. For if they did that they may just have to answer for their policies.
Colleges use Affirmative Action to Increase Diversity because only 66.1% of Blacks Graduate from High School
Interest rates recently went up for student loans. Something that greatly angered the left. Blaming the Republicans for playing politics with our children’s future. For a college education is the pathway to a good, high-paying job. A college education is so critical to a person’s future success that everyone should have access to a low-cost student loan. And because a college education is so important this should not be a privilege of the rich. Or whites. Colleges should use affirmative action to ensure a diversity of students. Because our differences, they say, make us better.
Yes, a college degree is important. And the data backs this up. The median family income in 2009 for someone with a bachelor’s degree was $90,530 (see Table 698. Money Income of Families—Distribution by Family Characteristics and Income Level: 2009 posted on census.gov). Those with only a high school diploma earned $48,637. While those who didn’t graduate from high school only earned $31,119. So clearly a college degree is the pathway to a good, high-paying job. Of course, to get that college degree you first have to enroll into college. And to do that you need to graduate from high school. So graduating from high school, then, is the gateway to those good, high-paying jobs. Which, as it turns out, is the reason we need affirmative action to ensure that diversity of students.
According to the National Center for Education Statistics (see National public high school graduation rate at a four-decade high by Lyndsey Layton posted 1/22/2013 on The Washington Post), not everyone is graduating from high school at the same rate. Looking at the breakout for three races we find that Asians are graduating 93% of the time. Whites are graduating 83% of the time. While blacks are graduating only 66.1% of the time. Which explains the need of affirmative action admission policies to achieve diversity at our colleges and universities. For when blacks are only 13% of the population and only 66.1% of them are graduating from high school you’re not going to get a lot of diversity without affirmative action.
Married People with College Degrees have Higher Median Family Incomes than Unmarried High School Dropouts
Going back to the Census data we can see a correlation between these high school graduation rates and median family income. Those with the highest graduation rate (Asians) earned $75,027. Those with the next highest graduation rate (whites) earned $62,545. While those with the lowest graduation rate (blacks) earned $38,409. Which clearly shows that high school graduates earn more than high school dropouts. And because Asians and whites have higher high school graduation rates than blacks they have higher median family incomes than blacks.
So we know that to earn a decent income you need a college degree. And to get that you need a high school diploma. But is there anything else that has a big influence on a family’s median income? As it turns out, yes. Going back to the Census data we see that a family with a married couple earned $71,627. A male householder with no spouse present earned $41,501. While a female householder with no spouse present earned only $29,770.
If you want to earn a lot of money, then, the way is clear. Graduate from high school. Go on to college and earn a degree. Then settle down. Get married. And raise a family. A common thread at every stage of this pathway is personal discipline. Staying in and studying instead of going out and partying. And once you start working start a family. For the heavy responsibility of raising children keeps people from staying up late and partying with friends. Get’s them to work on time in the morning. And drives them to advance in their careers to provide more for their families. Things employers like in employees. Making it easier for these people to climb the career ladder.
The People with the Highest Median Family Income also have the Lowest Out-of-Wedlock Births
A child growing up in a household with a married couple where at least one has a college degree will probably learn the values of his or her parents. To work hard. Exercise self-discipline. And work towards a long-term goal. Don’t take the easy way. Don’t take the fun way. Make sacrifices now that will help you attain your long-term goals. And it starts with studying and doing your homework. For a high school diploma is only the first bridge to cross of many to come. And if you don’t get across that first bridge you will advance no further down the road towards a good, high-paying job.
The family structure, then, is key. A child needs to learn the values that will let him or her exceed in life. And a married couple provides twice the parenting of a single-parent household. And doubles the earnings potential. By allowing one parent to pursue a full-time career. Which leads to greater income. Without having to sacrifice parenting time. Or risk burning out from trying to do everything alone. And the numbers prove this. According to Census data (see Social and Economic Characteristics of Currently Unmarried Women With a Recent Birth: 2011 posted on census.gov), the number of children being born out-of-wedlock differ greatly across the above three racial groups. Asians have the lowest out-of-wedlock births at 11.3%. While whites come in at 29.2%. And blacks come in at 67.8%.
The people with the highest median family income also have the lowest out-of-wedlock births. Confirming that the path towards a high-paying job is a high school diploma. A college education. Being careful NOT to have any children until you’re married. And after you graduate from college and establish a career get married and raise a family. In other words, personal discipline. Sacrificing short-term fun. For long-term success. Suggesting the reason why blacks earn a lower family median income than most is because of their high out-of-wedlock birthrate. Young black women having children before they graduate from high school. Which prevents them from crossing that first bridge on the road towards a good, high-paying job. Making her life more difficult. And giving her children a distinct disadvantage. At least, based on the Census data.
Twice in little over One Century an Enemy Invaded and Overran Russia/the Soviet Union
On June 24, 1812, Napoleon’s Grande Armée invaded Russia. And made it all the way to Moscow. Which they took. But the Russian army didn’t want anything to do with Napoleon or his Grande Armée so they kept retreating in front of it. Foiling Napoleon’s plans of engaging and defeating the Russian army. While drawing them deeper and deeper into Russia. In a scorched earth retreat. Leaving nothing for the French. Making it difficult to feed his massive army. Then the bitter Russian winter came. Having expected the Russians to have sued for peace by then they had no winter clothing. Leaving Napoleon no choice but to retreat.
On June 22, 1941, Joseph Stalin’s ally, Adolf Hitler, broke the Treaty of Non-aggression between Germany and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. And invaded the Soviet Union. About one month later than planned due to some trouble their Italian allies were having in the Balkans. The Nazi armies advanced through the Soviet armies and reached Leningrad, Moscow and Stalingrad. Then the bitter Russian winter came. And like the French the Germans had no winter clothing. Having expected a victory before the onset of winter. They tried to hold their ground as they froze and starved. But the Soviets pushed them back. Eventually all the way to Berlin. But not after some 20 million Soviets died.
Twice in little over one century an enemy invaded and overran Russia/the Soviet Union. Never again vowed the Soviets. So when they chased the Nazis back into Berlin they kept the territory they were on after the war. Which is why Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, East Germany, Czechoslovakia, Bulgaria, Hungary, Romania and Albania became Soviet satellites. Countries behind the Iron Curtain. To provide a buffer to slow down another invasion before it reached Soviet soil.
For the Latter Part of the 20th Century the Soviets tried to extend their Communist Revolution to other Nations
Of course, following World War II it was the Soviets that had an expansionist policy. A little thing called the communist revolution. The assault on capitalism. Replacing it with socialism first. Then communism. And as revolutions go they are fought. With guns. So the communist revolution was a perpetual state of war interrupted with moments of peace. A war the Soviets forced onto their neighbors to get them to join them in their socialist/communist utopia. Something their neighbors didn’t want. And something their other neighbors, the Western Powers, would try to help them avoid.
The German capital, Berlin, fell in East Germany. Berlin, however, was a city divided between the Western Allies and the Soviet Union. The Western Allies supplied West Berlin via truck and rail transport. Until the Soviets closed the borders. In an effort to force West Berlin into the social utopia that was East Berlin. Something the West Berliners wanted no part of. So the Western Powers helped them by supplying the city via the Berlin Airlift. Eventually the Soviets relented. And opened the truck and rail transport into West Berlin.
The Soviets tried to spread their socialist utopia to other countries that didn’t want it. Greece. Turkey. Iran. South Korea. The United States and the Western Powers helped these countries resist these Soviet advances. Even fighting a shooting war on the Korean peninsula to push the Soviet and China backed North Korea out of South Korea. So through the remainder of the 20th century the Soviets tried to extend the communist revolution to other nations. While the United States tried to thwart their designs. And stared each other down with their nuclear weapons in the Cold War. Developing the doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD). Meaning that any country that started a nuclear war was going to lose, too, in that nuclear exchange. It was mutually assured but it really was a warning to the Soviets. Who had designs on conquering other nations. Including the United States. Who had no designs on waging war with the Soviet Union.
Geopolitics is about the Balance of Power
To balance the threat of the Soviet Union the Western Powers formed the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). For Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, etc., had no chance by themselves against an attacking Soviet Union. They did as a member of NATO, though. Where an attack on one was an attack on all. Which meant if the Soviets attacked the Low Countries they were also attacking France, the United Kingdom, Canada and the United States. The Americans even deployed armor units in West Germany. The Soviets replied with the Warsaw Pact. A NATO-like organization between the Soviet Union and some of those countries in Eastern Europe they never left after the end of World War II.
And there was peace. What we call the Pax Americana. The American peace. For it was the awesome might of the American military that gave NATO its teeth. With troops deployed around the world. Air forces stationed within striking distances of potential hotspots. The mightiest navy ever to ply the oceans. A huge nuclear arsenal. And the greatest economy in the world that could pay for all of this while the American people still lived a happy and carefree life with all of the comforts a capitalist society could give. Something the socialism/communism of the Soviet Union could not. For the people in the Soviet sphere waited for apartments, cars and groceries. Large extended families crowded into small apartments. And people waited in lines at stores with empty shelves. Which explains why the Soviets required a brutal secret police force. The KGB.
People in the Soviet sphere who learned of how much better life was in the West tried to escape to the West. This is why they built the Berlin Wall. Not to keep West Berliners from sneaking into that socialist utopia inside East Berlin. But to keep the East Berliners from escaping that socialist utopia. For the only way you can get people to live in that socialist/communist utopia is by force. And you have to spread the communist revolution not to make life better for people in capitalist societies. But to destroy that better life across the border from communist societies. To extinguish that beacon of liberty that keeps luring their people from their oppressive police state. Something Russia is returning to. As Vladimir Putin slowly but surely reassembles the Soviet Union. Not to reconstitute the buffer to protect Russia from another invasion. But simply because he wants to. And can. So far, at least.
Geopolitics is about the balance of power. Some like to maintain a balance of power to keep the peace. Like the Romans, the British and the Americans did with their Pax Romana, Pax Britannica and Pax Americana. Where the prevailing superpower kept the peace. While others are more interested in acquiring power than peace. Like Napoleon Bonaparte, Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin and Vladimir Putin. Who didn’t have strong economies. And used force to get what they wanted. Raw materials. Food. Or a warm water port in the Crimea. And they are always looking for a weakness in their enemies to alter the balance of power. For they were/are masters of geopolitics. And want to redraw the borders of the world. To restore the former glory of a past empire. Or to realize some glorious destiny they believe God has planned for the nation.
Thanks to President Obama the United States is now the Rodney Dangerfield of Superpowers
The American public is consumed with the missing Malaysian Airlines Flight 370. They can’t get enough of the news coverage that is anything but news. With cable news delivering 24/7 coverage of nothing but speculation. Even the networks are giving the speculation expansive coverage. They’d never give Obamacare, Benghazi, the IRS targeting conservative groups, etc., this kind of coverage. But they will give Malaysian Airlines Flight 370 this kind of coverage. For apart from the insufferable despair of the families who lost their loved ones it’s a great mystery people want to see unfold. And be the one to solve it. But while that is going on the world is becoming a less safe place. Thanks to Vladimir Putin.
President Obama’s ‘please like us’ foreign policy has failed. The reset with Russia has not improved our relations. In fact, they are about as bad as they were during the Cold War. With Putin doing some Cold War chess playing. Completely unimpressed with President Obama he’s making bold moves. And when he does all he gets from the United States is talk. He annexed Crimea without any real opposition from the Western Powers. Especially the United States. And he is probably looking at the Baltic States now. Seeing no reason yet to stop in his quest to put the Soviet Union back together. This is what the American people are missing. For the networks are barely covering it. And the people are blissfully ignorant of how the United States is now the Rodney Dangerfield of superpowers. We get no respect from our enemies. So our enemies make bold moves. Because that’s who they are. The creators of South Park made a movie called Team America: World Police (2004). This followed 9/11 and the beginning of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. When the United States began its fight in the global war on terror. Though a comedy the writers seem to have a better grasp on the real world than the Obama administration or the mainstream media. Who think in the 21st century that war no longer exists because world leaders now discuss their differences like rational and civilized adults according to international law. And honor their agreements. But what they don’t understand is something that’s been true since the dawn of civilization. There are three types of people in the world. As a drunk in Team America: World Police explains crudely but succinctly. (WARNING: The following video is for mature audiences only. For it’s pretty rude and crude and completely inappropriate for the workplace.)
If you’ve watched the video you’ll understand what the three types are. We’ll call them D, P and A (both singular and plural). In the context of this movie America was a D. And Kim Jong Il was an A. As were the Islamist terrorists. While the leftist ‘give peace a chance’ Hollywood liberals in the movie (who belonged to the Film Actors’ Guild) were P. As was the United Nations who sent Hans Blix to inspect Kim Jong Il’s regime to make sure he didn’t have any weapons of mass destruction (WMD). —SPOILER ALERT— Team America, the world police, go tear-assing around the world, blowing up parts of countries as they hunt and kill terrorists. Making the world a safer place. While Kim Jong Il plots to set off WMDs, using the Islamist terrorists to plant his WMDs. The F.A.G. actors publicly denounce Team America for their wanton destruction and call corporations the real enemy. Even going to North Korea to attend a peace conference that Kim Jong Il was hosting. Believing Kim Jong Il was a man of peace. And were willing to kill Team America to help Kim Jong Il go forward with his peace plans. Which was actually blowing up countries all around the world into third-world status.
Hitler promised the Naïve Chamberlain that the Sudetenland would be his last Territorial Acquisition
The movie showed the futility of diplomacy when you’re dealing with A. Because they will lie and say anything you want to hear to shut you up and make you go away. And when you do they’re just going to crap all over you and the world. Because that’s what A do. The P don’t understand that. They think they can negotiate and arrive at an agreement with people who lie. History is full of treaties that A have broken. Because they don’t respect anything but strength. And if all you got are words an A just isn’t going to respect you. And will crap on you the first chance he gets. Especially if you’re a P. The Russian people understand this. During the Sochi Olympics the Daily Show‘s Jason Jones interviewed Russians during the Sochi Games. And a woman told him they have a saying in Russia. Don’t be a P. Which is why they love Vladimir Putin. He’s not a P. He’s an A.
Communists are A. They just want to crap all over everyone. During the Korean War every time they were losing on the battlefield they called for a ceasefire to negotiate a peace treaty. Using the cessation in hostilities to reinforce their weakened positions. Proving you just cannot trust an A. Or negotiate with an A. Yet the leftist ‘give peace a chance’ liberals think you can. And that all George W. Bush did by being an A was make the world hate the United States. Even though Muammar Gaddafi, who was a first class A, respected George W. Bush when he invaded Iraq. Saw that strength. Respected that strength. And did not want to get his ass kicked by that strength. So he gave up his WMDs willingly. And joined the Americans in the fight against al Qaeda (Libya is a far less safe place today than it was under Muammar Gaddafi after the Iraqi invasion). This is what A understand. Strength. It’s the one thing that makes them act. Not words. As this funny scene in Team America: World Police illustrates so poignantly. (WARNING: The following video is for mature audiences only. For it’s pretty rude and crude and completely inappropriate for the workplace.)
We ended the war in Iraq with a ceasefire. Part of the terms that Saddam Hussein agreed to was to destroy his WMDs and document their destruction. He never did. In part because he didn’t have them anymore. Having sent them over the border into Syria (most likely) on trucks and in two converted Iraqi Airways Boeings before the invasion. Adolf Hitler promised the naïve Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain that the Czechoslovakian Sudetenland would be his last territorial acquisition. Chamberlain returned to Britain with a treaty signed by Herr Hitler promising “peace in our time.” Shortly thereafter Hitler launched World War II (the bloodiest and costliest war of all time) and removed Poland from the map. Because Hitler was an A. And you just can’t negotiate with an A. Especially if you’re a P who believes we can settle all our differences if we only communicate with each other. No. An A sees anyone who wants to ‘open a dialogue’ as a P. And they will laugh at how gullible they are. Getting a lot of concessions by making promises they have no intention of keeping. A love P. Because they are so easy to crap all over.
The Russians like President Obama in Office because he is the Anti-Ronald Reagan
The Obama administration confuses being liked with being respected. They think if people like America they will respect America. Nothing could be further from the truth. People respect people they hate. At least, if they fear people they hate. A key distinction. For Vladimir Putin has no love for President Obama. Who looks at him as a P. Which Russians just don’t respect. They even have a saying. Don’t be a P. So Putin has no respect whatsoever for President Obama. Because he does not fear President Obama. The recent sanctions President Obama issued by executive order only amused the Russians. They thought they were nothing more than a joke. Even replied with in-kind sanctions of their own. Oh they had a good laugh at President Obama trying to act tough. But they just don’t respect him. But you know who they did respect? Ronald Reagan.
During a radio check President Reagan was testing the sound levels before a radio address. And he made a joke. He said into the microphone, “My fellow Americans, I’m pleased to tell you today that I’ve signed legislation that will outlaw Russia forever. We begin bombing in five minutes.” This joke leaked out. And made it to the Soviet Union. And what do you think they did? Did they have a good laugh like they did when President Obama tried to act tough? No. They didn’t. They put their Soviet Far East Army on alert. For they did not like Ronald Reagan. But they sure as hell respected that crazy son of a bitch. And feared him. As well as the awesome military power of the United States. Which they knew President Reagan had no problem using. Unlike the current occupant of the White House. Who wants to shrink the size of the military to pre-World War I levels. Something only a P would do in the eyes of an A like Vladimir Putin. No. President Obama is more of an apologetic president for America’s greatness. While President Reagan made no apologies. He believed in American Exceptionalism. And was damn proud of it. The shiny city on the hill. The beacon of liberty. Defender of freedom. And he would broadcast the Team America theme song proudly at our enemies. Unlike the apologist now occupying the White House (WARNING: The following video is for mature audiences only. For it’s pretty rude and crude and completely inappropriate for the workplace.)
America may have its faults but it is still the best country in the world. Proven by the flow of immigrants (legal and illegal) to our shores. We may be arrogant but that’s only because we have a right to be. Because we are the best m-f’ing country in the world. F*** yeah. We’ve made the world a better place. And the world knows this. Which is why our enemies love having our country run by people who are ashamed of America’s greatness. Because they can crap all over the world and get away with it. Like Putin did by annexing Crimea. Because they know there is no crazy son of a bitch in the White House that will use the awesome power of the United States to stop them. Just a bunch of leftist ‘give peace a chance’ liberals who will wag their finger at them. And if they don’t quake with fear they will wag their finger at them again. Or write a letter. The Russians couldn’t be happier. And lament that if there were only people like the current administration running the United States in the Eighties the Soviets never would have lost the Cold War. But now Vladimir Putin, former KGB officer in the Soviet Union, sees his chance. He can put the Soviet Union together again. As they have the anti-Ronald Reagan in office now. And can do whatever the hell they want to. Because they aren’t P. They’re A.
The Social Democracies of Europe were all Oppressive Absolute Monarchies at one Time
What happened in Newtown, Connecticut, was a tragedy. The shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary took 26 lives. Including 20 children. The most innocent of us. Which has ignited a firestorm of debate over guns. The Left blames these deaths on an epidemic of gun violence. Caused by people having access to guns. So the Left wants to have a real debate on gun control. To stop this epidemic of child deaths caused by firearms. By severely restricting access to guns.
Those on the Right, on the other hand, want to protect their Second Amendment right. The right to keep and bear arms. Which allowed the First Amendment. Freedom of speech. The British colonial governors tried hard to clamp down on the anti-British sentiment in their American colonies. And to muzzle that anti-British speech. They sent over British Red Coats to occupy American cities to keep order. And to find and confiscate the Americans’ guns. So the first few amendments of the Bill of Rights (the first 10 amendments) protected free speech. Gave us the power to protect ourselves from future state oppressors. And they even included the Third Amendment. Which states, “No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.” Again, further protection from state oppression.
The nature of states is to oppress their people. Most have throughout history. Even the social democracies of Europe were all oppressive absolute monarchies at one time. Where kings could do pretty much anything they wanted to. England changed that with representative government. America expanded on these liberties in the New World. And ever since has been very wary of government. Until the Twentieth century. When the growth of government began. Transferring ever more power to the federal government. Everything the Founding Fathers feared would happen without a Bill of Rights.
When it comes to Restricting our Constitutional Rights Liberals Trust Government while Fearing Republicans
Those on the Left say the Constitution is a relic of a different age. That today’s government is a kinder government. A more caring government. One that just wants to take care of the people. By providing generous benefits. Of course this is how some of the worst dictatorships started. Nazi Germany and the USSR both put the people first. Or so they said. Even their names said they were putting the people first. The Nazis were National Socialists. And the USSR was the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Socialism is all about taking care of the people. Yet these nations had some the most brutal secret police that terrorized and oppressed their people. For there is no easier way to dictatorial power than championing the people. And once the people stop fearing their government is when the state can take away their guns. To make that oppression easier. The Syrian government is currently having difficulty oppressing their people because they failed to keep guns out of the hands of those they wish to oppress.
If you read a history book you will read a lot about state secret police and state oppression. It’s more the rule than the exception. When you grow up in a free country it’s hard to believe this. And when you’re young you think whatever you know and have experienced is normal. And that things have always been that way. Which is why the younger liberals dismiss talk about the transfer of power to the federal government. While the older conservatives who have seen great change in their lives and know history still fear their government. While the younger liberals grow up believing that government is not to be feared but to be trusted blindly. They even look at what China is doing with their economy with approval. Where the government controls the economy. They like that. Because liberals believe we can always trust a government more than a private corporation. Even if that government oppresses their people. Like they do in China. Where people still deal with famine in the country. Rural workers are paid poorly and live in dormitories in the city factories. And political dissidents are tortured in labor camps where they manufacture goods without pay.
So naïve liberals trust government. Completely. Unless it’s George W. Bush using the Patriot Act. That they fear. But when President Obama uses the Patriot Act liberals ask, “The Patriot what?” When it came to secret wiretaps on people with known ties to terrorists the Left quaked with fear over where these abuses of power would end. But when President Obama starts talking about gun control they haven’t a care in the world. Because when it comes to restricting our constitutional rights liberals trust government while fearing Republicans.
People killed 37 Kids with Guns in 2010 while Partial-Birth Abortions have claimed some 2,000 Lives a Year
President Obama’s former Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel, said, “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste.” For the best way to advance an agenda (especially an unpopular agenda) was in the emotional chaos following a serious crisis. Such as the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary. The majority of Americans oppose gun control. But in that majority are some people that they may be able to convince that some restrictions on the Second Amendment is a good thing in the emotional chaos following Sandy Hook Elementary. Convincing them that guns are causing an epidemic of childhood deaths. That without guns these kids simply wouldn’t be dying. A powerful message during emotional times. But if you remove the emotions and look at some facts you see something different (see 10 Leading Causes of Death, United States by the Centers for Disease Control).
These are deaths by unintentional injury. Looking at the leading causes of death in 2010 (the latest year of data) for children aged 5-14 you see 1,643 deaths. About half (809) of those are from motor vehicle accidents. Drowning came in next at 251 (15.3%). Then fire/burn at 135 (8.2%). Then suffocation at 79 (4.8%). You have to go all the way down to number 7 on the list to get to firearms. Where we can see they killed 37 children in 2010. Or 2.3% of the total number of kids aged 5-14 who died from an unintentional injury. Based on an approximate population of 41 million kids aged 5-14 the total number of kids killed by firearms comes to about 0.00009% of this total. According to the CDC’s numbers, guns aren’t killing a lot of kids. Motor vehicles are. But firearms are not. So taking away our guns will probably not change these numbers much. If at all. So the motive can’t be saving children’s lives. In fact, one can make the argument that there is a greater killer of children out there than anything on the above list. Abortion.
It’s hard to get numbers on abortions. But if you check various sources the number appears to be over a million a year. Wikipedia shows 1,313,000 abortions in 2000. Including 2,232 (about 0.17% of all abortions in 2000) that were partial-birth abortions. Whatever your politics on the abortion issue are one thing regarding partial-birth abortions is clear. These are human lives. For the ‘partial’ part of these abortions requires terminating the life of the fetus while the head is still inside of the mother. For if they terminated the life of the fetus outside of the mother it would be murder according to the law. And you can’t kill something that isn’t alive. In fact, an accidental wrongful death of a pregnant woman often results in two charges of manslaughter. One for the mother. And one for the unborn fetus. Assuming there was no spike in partial-birth abortions in 2000 one can assume that number is representative of all years. Which is far more deaths than by motor vehicle accident let alone from firearms. Yet President Obama wants gun control to save kids lives. When he could save even more by simply revising his stance on partial-birth abortion. Something he argued to keep when a state senator in Illinois.
Bad Guys won’t open their Can of Whoop-Ass if there is a Chance they’ll get their Ass Kicked
Bullies generally pick on smaller and weaker people. Smaller and weaker people don’t pick on tough guys. They don’t walk up to a bully and give him a wedgie. They’d like to. But they don’t. Why? Because if a small and weak person did they’d get their ass kicked. That’s why. And people don’t like getting their ass kicked. But sometimes it’s the tough guys that save the day.
In the opening scene of V for Vendetta Evey was about to get raped by some government thugs. Then tough guy V came along and kicked their asses. Saving Eve from a brutal rape. In Die Hard the evil Hans Gruber was going to kill everyone in that building until tough guy John McClane happened on the scene. And started killing the bad guys. Saving the day. In the movie Patton everyone wanted him thrown out of the Army after he slapped that crying soldier. But when the Allies’ drive stalled in the Normandy hedgerow country who did they turn to? That’s right. Tough guy General Patton. Who started kicking Nazi ass big time. Breaking through their lines and advancing in every compass direction while British General Bernard Montgomery was still struggling o take his D-Day objective. Caen.
People don’t like getting their ass kicked. But if they are in danger of a good ass-kicking they’d want someone on their side who can kick ass as good as the next guy. For even bad guys don’t want to get their ass kicked. And if there is a chance of that happening they’re going to think long and hard before opening their can of whoop-ass. Especially when someone else’s can of whoop-ass is bigger.
Only the Military Might of the United States could contain Soviet Expansion
The Roman Empire had one mighty can of whoop-ass. Something her potential enemies understood. And feared. So they didn’t cause any trouble. Because they didn’t want to get their ass kicked. Which is why from approximately 27 BC to 180 AD there was relative peace in the world. Pax Romana. For the Romans had the mightiest military force in the world. And if you went up against them you were most likely going to lose. So they didn’t. Instead, choosing to live in peace.
The British Empire was even larger than the Roman Empire. And had an even larger can of whoop-ass. Not only did they have armies throughout their empire which was so large that the sun never set on it. The Royal Navy ruled the seas. Which meant if you caused any trouble in the world you could expect an ass-kicking. Either from her mighty military power. Or her aid to a smaller and weaker country under threat from an aggressive neighbor. The bad guys learned. It wasn’t worth it. If you tried to break the peace you were going to get your ass kicked. Which is why from 1815 through 1914 when the British Empire ruled the world there was relative peace. Pax Britannica.
The United States of America had come of age during the 20th century. Growing even bigger and stronger than the empire that sired her. The British Empire. Who went into decline during the 20th century. But just as Pax Britannica drew to a close and the world became a more dangerous place the United States stepped in. Allowing the Allies to defeat Nazi Germany. And Imperial Japan. She grew to have the biggest can of whoop-ass in history. And became the world’s policeman. Pushing back against Soviet expansion. In Europe. The Balkans. The Middle East. And Southeast Asia. The Soviets wanted to conquer the world. And would have if not for America’s mighty military to counter their threat. Leading to a period of relative peace following World War II. Pax Americana. As only the military might of the United States could contain Soviet expansion.
Vladimir Putin feels that he can put the old Soviet Union back together during the Obama Administration
During a sound check before a radio address President Reagan made a joke. He said, “My fellow Americans, I’m pleased to tell you today that I’ve signed legislation that will outlaw Russia forever. We begin bombing in five minutes.” Reagan had a sense of humor and those present laughed. The joke leaked. The Soviets heard it. And they put their Soviet Far East Army on alert. You see, they had great respect for the awesome military power of the United States. And they respected Reagan. They did not like him. But they respected him. And if he said he was going to open a can of whoop-ass on them they got nervous. For President Reagan may have spoken softly. But he was not afraid to kick ass.
The Soviets had no such respect for Reagan’s predecessor. Jimmy Carter. In fact, they had so little respect for him that they developed a nuclear first-strike plan. For Carter was gutting the military. And wasn’t a tough guy when it came to foreign policy. He was a president who wanted to focus on domestic policy. A sign of weakness the Soviets could smell. Anyone who gutted the military to pay for more domestic spending would never pull the nuclear trigger. At least that’s what the Soviets thought. Which is why they prepared a nuclear first-strike plan during the Carter administration. Sure they could win a nuclear war against him. The Soviets thought no such thing during the Reagan administration. So instead of a nuclear war (which may have happened in a Carter second term) we had peace. Because of our strength.
Peace through strength. If you’re a bad-ass people will leave you alone. Because no one wants to get their ass kicked. If you’re hell-bent on beating the crap out of your neighbor so you can take her resources and there is a bad-ass in the world that can bring a world of hurt down on you it will make you think. And pause. This is why there was a Pax Romana. A Pax Britannica. And a Pax Americana. Because people respect a bad-ass. And will not incite it. They may hate the bad-ass. But they will respect it. And not piss it off.
President Obama has a strong domestic agenda. Like Jimmy Carter. He doesn’t want to deal with foreign policy. Like Jimmy Carter. And he is not respected or feared by the world’s bad guys. Like Jimmy Carter. Who is far more inclined to make a speech and threaten action. But is far less likely to open a can of whoop-ass. Like Ronald Reagan. Which is why Vladimir Putin feels that he can put the old Soviet Union back together during the Obama administration. Because he doesn’t fear the wrath of President Obama. As no one does. For he is all bark and no bite. At least, so far. Apart from killing a bunch of people that can’t fight back. Drone strikes. Bombing Libya (that was no threat to American interests). And killing Osama bin Laden with a SEAL team. More of an imperial use of force than acting as the world’s policeman to safeguard liberty and democracy. So Vladimir Putin has little to worry about during an Obama presidency. Unlike conservatives in America.
Slavery made the South more like an Old World Aristocracy than a New World Meritocracy
Democrats don’t like people of color. Never have. The Democrat Party’s lineage goes back to Thomas Jefferson’s Democratic-Republican Party. Thomas Jefferson was one of our Founding Fathers who, as the Democrats love to remind us, owned slaves. In fact, the Democratic-Republican Party was the party of the planter elite. And of slavery. While the opposition party, the Federalists, whose members included George Washington, John Adams and Alexander Hamilton, preferred manufacturing and commerce for the future of the United States. Not just plantations and slavery.
It was these southern planters who made the Three-Fifths Compromise necessary. Slaves couldn’t vote. So the North didn’t want to count them in determining the number of representatives a state had in the House of Representatives. The planter elite did not like this. As the anti-slave North had more free people and would end up controlling the government. Possibly passing anti-slave legislation. Well, without the southern states there would be no United States. So they compromised and counted some of their slaves. Giving the planter elite greater power in the new federal government than their population would otherwise have allowed. And to seal the deal they agreed not to discuss the issue of slavery again for 20 years.
The minority power in the South, the planter elite, who were Democratic-Republicans, brought a lot of slaves to the United States during that 20 year moratorium on the slavery issue. Swelling the slave population in the South. But once the 20 years were up Congress banned the slave trade. So from that point forward all slaves would have to be born on U.S. soil. But the minority power in the South had built their little fiefdoms by then. Owning large estates. With their lands worked by their large slaveholdings. Making the South more like an Old World aristocracy than a New World meritocracy. And the planter elite liked having so much power vested in so few of their hands. From having their few numbers control the federal government. To their absolute control of so many human lives on their plantations. They were an elite few. A superior people. And they liked it.
The South used the Power of the Federal Government to Suppress States’ Rights in the North with the Fugitive Slave Act
Over time as the north pursued the dreams of Washington, Adams and Hamilton immigration began to swell the population in the industrial North. Leading to the South losing their control over the House of Representatives. And threatening their elitism. By then the Democratic-Republican Party had become the Democrat Party. Which pushed to protect the institution of slavery. To protect their southern aristocracy. And their elevated status as a superior people. They used the power of the federal government where they could. Such as passing the Fugitive Slave Act to force free states against their will to return free blacks in their states to slavery. Then they argued that their states’ rights were at risk with all of the North’s abolition talk. Where the North might one day do what the South did to them. Use the federal government to force a state to do something against their will. Such as they did with the Fugitive Slave Act.
Their fight for the Senate led to further compromises to keep the union together while accommodating the planter elite. The Missouri Compromise (1820) had prohibited slavery in the new territory in the Louisiana Territory above approximately the southern border of Missouri (but permitted it within the borders of Missouri). Each state gets two senators. So with the House lost the Democrats needed more of the new states from the Louisiana Territory entered into the Union as slave states. Even those above the southern border of Missouri. Which they did with the Kansas–Nebraska Act. Which repealed the Missouri Compromise and replaced it with popular sovereignty. Where the people would chose whether they wanted to be a slave state or a free state. Setting off a mad rush by both sides to get to these territories so they could vote the slave status of these new states their way. Leading to a bloody civil war in Kansas.
Then another blow fell to the southern aristocracy. Abraham Lincoln. With the election of Republican Abraham Lincoln the southern aristocracy lost not only the House of Representatives but the presidency as well. Worse, the Republicans were an anti-slavery party. So even if they were somehow able to hold onto the Senate the Republicans in power would challenge the planter elite’s supremacy. Break up their fiefdoms. And challenge their power. Something this elite few were willing to fight to prevent. Well, they were willing to have others fight for them. To maintain the social order in the South. Leading to cries about states’ rights. And an over-powerful federal government. Despite their having used the power of the federal government to suppress states’ rights in the North with the Fugitive Slave Act.
Democrats see Benefits for Blacks as a Necessary Evil to keep them in Power
Most southerners were poor farmers. Who owned no slaves. Yet they rose to fight for states’ rights. And to protect the South from northern aggression. At least, that was what the planter elite had them believe. Who sent many of these poor farmers to their deaths in the American Civil War. When it was over approximately 8.6% of the South’s population was dead. By comparison World War II killed approximately 405,399 Americans. However, if we had suffered the same death rate as the South did in the American Civil War our World War II dead would have totaled over 12 million. This is what the southern aristocracy was willing to—and did—sacrifice to maintain their power and privilege. Their supremacy over other people. Especially over their black slaves.
Such a feeling of superiority allows you to do some pretty horrible things. Just review the history of Nazi Germany to see some of the atrocities a ‘master race’ can do. In the post-war South the Democrats did not lose with grace. They resented the martial law in the South after the war. And they hated Republican rule. Protecting their former slaves. Even allowing them to run for government office. It was all too much for the fallen southern aristocracy. To remind people of the proper order of southern society they formed the KKK. And unleashed a terror across the South. Killing their former slaves. And Republicans. To codify their white supremacy the Democrats turned to the legislature. And passed laws to segregate the ‘inferior blacks’ from their superior selves. Jim Crowe Laws. Separate but equal. With the emphasis on ‘separate’. In time pressure grew against the southern Democrats. But they held strong in Congress. Fighting against any civil rights legislation. Including the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Where Democrat Senator Robert Byrd (and former Exalted Cyclops of the KKK) filibustered against the Civil Rights Act for 14 hours and 13 minutes. To keep the blacks segregated from their superior selves.
Things are a lot better these days. But Democrat feelings of superiority die hard. Even though they would have us believe they like blacks today. Despite their past hatred of blacks. And their seething anger of having lost them from their plantations. But they found a way to ‘get them back on the plantation’. By making them dependent on government. In exchange for their vote. Which keeps them in power. Back where they believe they belong. And are entitled to be. Because they are a superior people. So benefits for blacks are a necessary evil to Democrats. For they still don’t like them. As evidenced by where they live. Where some of the richest Democrats (such as Nancy Pelosi) live in the whitest of neighborhoods. And their apparent racial purification of society. Through the guise of women’s rights. The most important thing to women, according to Democrats, is abortion. And they do their best to make abortion readily available. Especially to women of color. Like in New York City. And Mississippi. Where black women are having far more abortions than white women. Making America whiter. More like the neighborhood where Nancy Pelosi lives. And more like the color Democrats have fought to keep America since the Three-Fifths Compromise. The Fugitive Slave Act. Popular Sovereignty. The KKK. And Jim Crowe Laws.
Hitler received the Iron Cross for Bravery which carried a lot of Currency in a Militaristic Germany
Adolf Hitler could give a speech that fired up the masses. People loved him. The Nazis rose to power by winning elections. People elected them because they liked what the Nazis were saying. Things were not that good in Germany. The victorious Allies blamed World War I on them even though all nations jumped in enthusiastically. And then to add insult to injury the Allies made Germany pay reparations. Burdening Germany with the cost of World War I.
This was especially galling as Germany didn’t lose the war. The war ended in an armistice. Which is a mutual cessation of warfare. Not unconditional surrender. And yet here was Germany. Being treated as if they surrendered unconditionally. It made a lot of people feel angry. And betrayed. Enter Adolf Hitler. Who could tap into that anger and feelings of betrayal.
Hitler was a war veteran. He served as a dispatch runner in World War I. Wounded by artillery. And blinded temporarily by mustard gas. He even received the Iron Cross for bravery. Although it may have had more to do with spending so much time with senior officers at headquarters that issued those dispatches. But for a militaristic Germany an Iron Cross carried a lot of currency.
When the Reichstag burned down Hitler blamed the Marxists and turned Germany into a Police State
So Hitler was a brave war hero. Even though he didn’t actually use a weapon. Which was a good foundation to build on. For war heroes don’t stab people in the back after fighting bravely for them in war. Which is how many Germans felt about the politicians. Betrayed. Victims of the evil, conniving politicians. So the people felt victimized. And they were looking for someone to stand up for them. To right these wrongs.
Hitler wanted to be an artist. But when that didn’t work he turned to politics. And learned what a good speaker he was. He even studied how to become a better speaker. How to look. How to use his hands. How to inflect his voice. His speeches became very moving. Very dramatic. He made the defeated Germans feel better. For he told them that it wasn’t their fault. It was the politicians, and the Marxists, that stabbed Germany in the back. And he was the one man that could do something about it.
When the Reichstag burned down he blamed the Marxists. Who the Nazis shared power with in the Reichstag. But didn’t want to. It’s still debated who started the fire (the communists, the Nazis, others) but what it did was allow the newly appointed chancellor, Adolf Hitler, to urge President Hindenburg to suspend all civil liberties so they could hunt these communists down like the dogs they were. President Hindenburg did. And the government rounded up the communists. With them out of the government the Nazis no longer had to share power. And turned Germany into a police state. To keep that power.
The Equation Brutal Dictators use to stay in Power is Victimization + Demonization + Emotion = Power
Hitler was charismatic. He could give a powerful speech. And after the Reichstag fire he controlled the people. Using censorship and propaganda he made himself god-like. The war hero. The savior of the German people. To undo all the injustice of the Versailles Treaty. Standing up to the Allies. Punishing those who stabbed Germany in the back (first the Marxists and then the Jews). And restoring German pride. Because he got even with those who wronged the German people. The people loved him. He could do no wrong in their eyes. No matter how much wrong he did. Which he could hide from the people. Thanks to his censoring of the free press. And his state propaganda machine. Which is why people packed stadiums and the sides of roads. Showering him with their adoration.
Adolf Hitler was Germany. Germany was Adolf Hitler. His national socialism provided for the people. In return the people were subservient to the state. Germany was more important than the individual. And Adolf Hitler was more important than Germany. So anything he did was okay. For he could do no wrong. As there was nothing more important than Adolf Hitler. For Hitler was a cult of personality. Above the law. And god-like. Where people believed he was the only one that could save the nation. And would do anything for him. With the most devout joining the SS. Fighting with unbounded fanaticism in combat. And carrying out the Holocaust with ruthless efficiency. They pledged their loyalty to Adolf Hitler. Not Germany. And would do anything for him. Anything at all. Even torture and kill their fellow Germans. If that was what their Führer wanted.
This is how dictators were able to do some of the things they did. Because they were a cult of personality. Mao Zedong. Saddam Hussein. Benito Mussolini. Muammar Gaddafi. Kim Il-sung. Kim Jong-il. Kim Jong-un. These brutal dictators were/are all worshipped by their people. At least the people they weren’t/aren’t torturing or killing. For they had an equation they used to remain in power. Victimization + Demonization + Emotion = Power. Similar to the equation the Democrats use to win elections. Victimization + Demonization + Emotion = Democrat Votes. Where they victimize the people. Find someone to demonize for this victimization. Such as Marxists and Jews in Nazi Germany. Or Republicans in the United States. Then use state propaganda to disseminate their lies. Like Joseph Goebbels did in Nazi Germany. And like the mainstream media in the United States disseminates Democrat talking points. And then use fiery rhetoric to incite the people’s emotions. Like Hitler, Hussein, Mussolini, Gaddafi, Kim Il-sung, Kim Jong-il, Kim Jong-un and every other cult of personality did. Like these ‘god-like’ people still do today.
The Democrat Party is the Cool Uncle that buys Booze and Cigarettes for his Nieces and Nephews
People characterize the Republicans as being a bunch of old fogies. Out of touch. Who don’t have a clue about the world today. Unlike their childrendo. Who are wise beyond their years. For they know there is nothing really bad with underage drinking and smoking. Smoking marijuana. Or doing other drugs. And there is nothing wrong with casual sex. Sexting. Or nude selfies.
This is why the children of old fogies like the Democrat Party. Because the Democrats get them. Unlike their parents. Their parents tell them they shouldn’t stay out late, drink, smoke, do drugs or have sex. While the Democrats decriminalize marijuana and work to decriminalize other drugs. Provide free birth control. And abortion without parental notification. Making the Democrat Party the cool uncle that buys booze and cigarettes for his nieces and nephews. So is it any wonder that the youth vote goes Democrat?
The ironic thing, though, is that these old fogies were once young themselves. And some were pretty wild in their youth, too. But once they became parents things changed. For when it’s their daughter they don’t want her being objectified. Encouraged to explore her sexuality by having so much casual sex that she catches a sexually transmitted disease or gets pregnant. Especially if they did in their youth. Which is the last thing they want for their little girl. Who is and will forever remain their little girl.
Keynesian Economics conditioned People to accept that Government knows Best
This is the rule. Not the exception. As kids grow up fighting their parents they reach a point in life where they realize that their parents were right all along. That if they had only spent more time on their homework and less time partying things would have turned out better. Life may have been less fun in the short-run but much better in the long-run. They’d had an earlier start in their career. A career with better pay and benefits. They could have bought a house sooner. Met someone to marry and start a family with sooner. Instead of finding themselves at 25 buried under student loan debt for a degree that can’t get them a job. And a decade or so of hooking up having conditioned men to shun any serious commitment. Leading their daughters to turn to serial dating and online dating. As they struggle to find someone else who has grown up, too.
This is what the old fogies know. That their kids don’t. You get wiser with age. Thanks to education. And experience. Two things the young just don’t have. And never will. Because by the time they grow wise from education and experience they are no longer kids. But well on their way to ‘old fogery’. Which is, of course, a problem for the Democrat Party. For a wise voting public will not help them win elections. As their Keynesian economic policies have nothing but a long record of failure. Giving us the Great Depression, the stagflation of the 1970s, the dot-com recession and the Great Recession. To name a few bad economic times Keynesian economics have given us. Things older people know from education and experience. But the kids voting Democrat don’t.
Keynesian economics ushered in the era of Big Government. And did something the Socialists could not. Conditioned people to accept that government knows best. Especially young people. Uneducated and inexperienced young people. Despite the Democrats’ horrible record concerning things economic. Because of this record the Democrats use lies and deceit to attack free market capitalism. That economic system that worked better than any other. To get people who knew no better to mistrust free market capitalism. And ask for the government to fetter unfettered capitalism. To make the world a fairer place.
The Democrats use Public Education to teach our Kids to Distrust Capitalism and to Trust Government
It sounds good to the inexperienced and uneducated. Because it feels good to think in terms of fairness. And if there is one thing the young have are emotions. They like to use their hearts. Not their brains. As they are idealistic and naïve. Unlike those old fogies who are realists. They can’t be fooled or swayed by the Democrat lies because they have learned and experienced a lot in their long lives. And heard the same old Democrat lies all through those long lives. Which is why the Democrats work so hard on the youth vote. The War on Women, their lax drug attitudes, birth control, abortion, gay rights…all of these are to get the young to think in terms of fairness. To tug on their heartstrings. To get them emotional. And keep them emotional. As well as ignorant.
The more ignorant people are the easier it is to lie to them. Anyone who knows the history of Western Civilization will understand how life became better for people as we moved closer to free market capitalism. Anyone who knows classical economics will understand how thrift, savings, free trade, sound money, etc., made America the number one economy in the world. While the Keynesian policies of today are threatening to knock America out of that number one spot. People who understand these things are not going to vote Democrat. Which is why the Democrats work hard to keep people from learning these things. By constantly lying about them. And not teaching them in the institutions they control. Our public schools. And our institutions of higher education.
The Republican equation for winning votes is a difficult equation. Knowledge + Experience + Reason = Republican Votes. It’s difficult because the Democrats have long controlled public education. Thanks to their friends in the teacher unions. And their friends running our institutions of higher education. Which spend more time teaching our kids to distrust capitalism. And to trust government. To feel more. And think less. To live for today. And not worry about tomorrow. Making it very difficult for the Republicans to get young voters to vote for them. As they are unknowledgeable (thanks to our public schools), inexperienced (because they are young) and prefer emotion over reason (because feeling is more fun than thinking). Which is why old fogies (the knowledgeable, experienced and thinking) vote Republican and the youth vote does not.
Politicians Lie because they will Lose Elections if they Tell the Truth
Politicians lie. Why? Simple. Politicians lie when telling the truth won’t help them win an election.
When President Obama lied the Lie of the Year he lied for a reason. People didn’t like the Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare). They did not want national health care. And they believed that Obamacare would put them onto the path to national health care. To allay their concerns President Obama said, “If you like your health care plan, you can keep it. Period.” The statement that became the Lie of the Year. Because a lot of people lost the health care they had and wanted to keep. In fact, they wrote the Affordable Care Act to make sure that would happen. As they need to herd as many of the young and healthy into Obamacare as possible to make the thing work. People who would pay into the program while not collecting any benefits. So they could subsidize the old and sick.
Had the president told the people that they would lose the health care plan that they liked and wanted to keep there would have been a lot more opposition to the Affordable Care Act. With constituents pressuring their representatives to vote against it or they would vote against them in the next election. This is why politicians lie when they do things against the will of the people. Because they will lose elections if they tell the truth.
Having Victims is No Good unless you have someone to Blame for their Victimization
Democrats lie a lot. Because their policies have a long history of failure. Especially their economic policies. And that’s because Democrats embrace Keynesian economics with a religious fervor. Despite Keynesian economics giving us the Great Depression, the stagflation of the Seventies, the dot-com bubble recession and the Great Recession. No, these Keynesian disasters don’t give Democrats any reason to doubt their faith. Because at the heart of Keynesian economics is an activist government in the private sector economy.
Democrats like to fault capitalism. Saying unfettered capitalism is unfair. Unfeeling. Cruel. And just plain mean. So they involve themselves in the private sector economy to even the playing field. To unrig the rigged game. To remove the unfair, unfeeling, cruel and mean elements of unfettered capitalism. By fettering capitalism. And the first thing they do is identify victims of capitalism. A secretary who pays a higher tax rate than her boss. Warren Buffet. Minimum wage workers who can’t earn a living wage. And, of course, people who live in fear of losing everything because they don’t have health insurance.
Of course having victims is no good unless you have someone to blame for their victimization. Such as the 1% who are extremely wealthy but don’t pay their ‘fair share’ of taxes. Even though they pay over a third of all federal income taxes while totaling only 1% of the population. Greedy business owners who’d rather pocket millions while depriving their workers from earning a living wage. Even though most business owners are not millionaires and probably could earn more by working for someone else. And evil corporations who force people to work against their will or lose their health insurance and other benefits. Even though people tend to work where they receive the best pay and benefit package their skill and experience can get. And will leave one job in a heartbeat for a job with a better pay and benefit package elsewhere.
The Affordable Care Act is an Economic Model that cannot deliver on its Promise
Once they have their victims and their villains all they need to do is pull on the heartstrings. To generate sympathy for the victims. While getting these same people angry at the villains. Which they do by avoiding facts. Instead, they tune in to people’s emotions. Victims are sad. And we should do something to help them from their victimization. Villains are bad. And we should do something to punish them. So they demonize these villains. Getting the people to believe that punishing them, say, with higher taxes will somehow improve their lives. Which it won’t. In fact, they could take all the wealth away from the 1% and imprison them but it won’t make a difference in the lives of the 99%. For if the 1% are no longer creating wealth they would be unable to pay over a third of all federal income taxes anymore. Requiring higher taxes on the 99%. Or a drastic cutting of government benefits.
If people understood sound economic principles (and not the Keynesian nonsense our power-hungry politicians favor) they would not be so emotionally manipulated. In fact, if people had a solid understanding of history they would never vote for anyone attacking capitalism. As unfettered capitalism is the only economic system that allows people without privilege to be as successful as anyone else in the country. Whereas the most anti-capitalistic countries have had the greatest poverty and human rights abuses. Such as the former Soviet Union, the People’s Republic of China, the former Eastern Bloc countries, North Korea, Cambodia, Cuba, etc. So for emotional manipulation to work they need a not so educated public. Which is why the Democrats control public education and our universities. And champion pre-K. To get control of our kids as soon as possible. To dumb them down. And program them into good Democrat voters.
This is the formula the Democrats use to win elections. Victimization + Demonization + Emotion = Democrat Votes. For they can’t win by telling the truth. Or having informed voters. So they use their control of our educational system to make more emotionally pliable voters. Ones that are easier to lie to. And that they can sway with fiery rhetoric. Which is why we have Obamacare today. Because the Affordable Care Act is an economic model that cannot deliver on its promise. To provide a higher quality health care to more people while costing less. Which is impossible. Just as it is impossible to draw a square circle. It’s either a square. Or a circle. It cannot be both. Ditto for the promise of Obamacare. Which is why to get people to believe that it was possible to give them more for less required telling a lie so big that it was voted the Lie of the Year.