Week in Review
Chicago is adrift in a sea of blood. Despite their strict gun laws there is an epidemic of gun violence in the city. And the reason for this, say those on the left, is the availability of guns elsewhere. Guns that are brought into Chicago and get into the hands of innocent young kids. Forcing them to leave their peace-loving ways. That’s the problem. Get rid of all the guns and those kids will stay peace-loving and as pure as the wind driven snow. For without guns there can be no violence. Because what person would never think about picking up a knife (see Impose tougher sentences for knife crimes, says top judge by David Barrett posted 4/16/2014 on The Telegraph)?
The most senior judge in England and Wales has called on magistrates to impose tougher sentences for youths who carry knives.
Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, the Lord Chief Justice, said more severe punishments could help cut the “prevalence” of such crimes.
In a ruling at the Court of Appeal in London, Lord Thomas said: “Given the prevalence of knife crime among young persons, the youth court must keep a very sharp focus, if necessary through the use of more severe sentences, on preventing further offending by anyone apprehended for carrying a knife in a public place and to securing a reduction in the carrying of knives.”
Chris Grayling, the Justice Secretary, has previously expressed his concern about knife criminals being handed cautions and other non-custodial punishments.
Mr Grayling brought in new measures in December 2012 which were designed to impose mandatory jail sentences on anyone who uses a knife or offensive weapon to threaten and endanger others.
Britain has very strict gun laws. It’s like Chicago writ large. So people can’t go to a part of Britain where there are lax gun laws. Buy guns. And taking them to another place in Britain that has strict gun laws. Even their police don’t carry guns while walking a beat. They do, however, have units that carry guns. In response to rising gun crime. But it’s the knife crime that Britain is struggling with. And much of the knife violence in Britain is due to the same cause of the gun violence in Chicago. Gangs.
Is knife violence preferred over gun violence? Perhaps. No doubt it is more difficult to stab an innocent bystander in a ‘drive-by’ stabbing. But because knives are so easy to get almost any gang member can carry a knife. And anyone with mental health issues can easily pick one up in most any kitchen. And cause harm. As in Calgary and Regina, Canada. And in Murrysville, Pennsylvania.
It’s not the guns or the knives that are causing people to harm others. These people are just determined to cause harm. You can try to take away every conceivable weapon but if they want to cause harm they will find a way to cause harm. Which is what we should be doing. Trying to prevent them from causing harm. Not just trying to prevent one way they can cause harm. With guns.
Tags: Britain, Chicago, crimes, gang, gun laws, gun violence, guns, knife, knife crime, knife violence, knives, violence
Week in Review
There was another senseless act of violence in our schools. Giving the pro-knife control lobby further ammo to take away our knives. Actually, no. Only senseless gun violence shifts the discussion away from the perpetrator. And onto the thing the perpetrator used. The gun. And not the underlying cause for this violence. Mental health issues. Which is why no one is talking about taking our knives away now after this senseless act of violence (see After Pennsylvania school stabbing, authorities and community ask: ‘Why?’ by Pamela Brown, Mary Kay Mallonee and Chelsea J. Carter posted 4/11/2014 on CNN).
A day after a Murrysville, Pennsylvania, teen allegedly rampaged through his high school’s hallways, stabbing wildly with two kitchen knives, the first hints of a possible motive began to emerge.
The attorney for 16-year-old Alex Hribal raised the specter that his client may have been bullied, telling CNN affiliate WTAE in Pittsburgh on Thursday that it looks like some kind of “bullying event” may have played a role.
“I think a lot of things have happened. I don’t want to comment specifically, but I think there are some things that occurred that led to where we are today,” Patrick Thomassey said.
But an FBI official, familiar with the investigation, discounted bullying as a motive.
“He was disaffected but not bullied,” the official said on condition of anonymity…
Some classmates at the school describe Hribal as having few friends and being quiet but also as a “really nice kid,” a description that contradicts the image of a knife-wielding teen offered by authorities…
Another student at the school who witnessed the attack said the attacker didn’t utter a word.
“He was very quiet. He just was kind of doing it,” Mia Meixner said. “And he had this, like, look on his face that he was just crazy and he was just running around, just stabbing whoever was in his way.”
According to Dan Stevens, the county deputy emergency management coordinator, Hribal had a very minor Facebook presence and didn’t have much experience on Twitter…
Westmoreland County District Attorney John Peck has argued against bail, saying that there could be no conditions that would protect the community and that Hribal made “statements when subdued by officials that he wanted to die.”
Mentally healthy people don’t do things like this. So it is safe to say that this person has a mental health issue. The FBI says he was ‘disaffected’. Which means he was resentful and rebellious. Perhaps having a problem with authority. He might have been bullied according to his lawyer. But his fellow classmates say he was quiet and really nice. Even though he had a minor Facebook presence. And little experience on Twitter. So he was a loner. Perhaps lacking social skills. Had he been bullied you’d think they may have said something like, “Yeah, I’m not surprised he did that with the way he was bullied.” But they didn’t. Another student said he looked crazy when he was running around stabbing people. Perhaps cracking after years of suppressing whatever he was suppressing behind that quiet and nice facade.
No one knows why he did what he did yet. But one thing for certain, you can’t blame this on easy access to guns. In fact, if the government took away all of our guns this would have still happened. Because the one commonality to all of these senseless crimes isn’t guns. It’s some underlying mental health issue. Because mentally healthy people just don’t do things like this.
Tags: bullied, knife, knife-control, knives, mental health, mental health issue, Pennsylvania, school, senseless act of violence, stabbing
Week in Review
Liberal Democrats want to take away our guns. In fact they’d like to repeal the Second Amendment. For people having guns in the household leads to gun crime. They like to point to Tucson, Aurora, Virginia Tech and Sandy Hook. Crimes they say would not have happened if there were no guns. Take away the guns and you take away these crimes. And you make our households safer. For without guns in the home there is no chance for domestic violence. There will be no women being shot by angry men. And no children dying if a parent goes off in a fit of anger and shoots them. For if there are no guns there can be no violence. The left believes this. At least they keep telling us this.
For guns make people kill. And without guns there will be nothing to make people kill. Luckily for the British they have no guns in their households. And live a life of peace and serenity the Americans can only dream about (see Domestic violence puts 10,000 at high risk of death or serious injury by Sandra Laville posted 2/26/2014 on the guardian).
More than 10,000 women and children are at high risk of being murdered or seriously injured by current or former partners, according to police assessments obtained by the Guardian…
But the figures obtained are likely to be an underestimate as domestic violence is heavily under-reported and police forces appear to gather and collate the information in several different ways, despite demands for a national protocol on assessing the risk to victims. The snapshot obtained by the Guardian reveals the acute nature of the threat of domestic violence for thousands of women and children…
Last year a coroner in Derbyshire found that police failures had contributed to the deaths of Rachael Slack and her two-year-old son, who were stabbed to death by her estranged partner. Slack had also been assessed as at high risk of homicide, but officers failed to inform her.
Or maybe not.
The obvious response to stop this domestic violence is to take away knives from British households. For apparently taking away their guns wasn’t enough. Then they should probably take away rope from the home. For they may make someone strangle someone. Blunt instruments, too. For they can make people kill, too. And poisons. Got to remove them from the home. Of course a man can beat and choke someone with his bare hands. So you better get those out of the household, too.
Of course, we have crossed over into the ridiculous. For it’s not these things that are killing women and children. It’s the people using them. And when one is not available they will look for another. So probably the best way to protect a woman and her children is to give that woman a gun. For if she has a gun it doesn’t matter how big her attacker is or how big the knife is he is threatening her with. Because all the strength she needs is that required to pull the trigger. And the big man with the big knife will fall. Even if he’s 200 pounds heavier. And a foot and a half taller. For there is nothing that empowers a woman more than a gun.
Tags: children, crime, domestic violence, gun, guns, knife, victims, women
Week in Review
International law restricts the kind of bullets we can use in war. In general, they have to have a full metal jacket. So they don’t flatten out in flight and make big holes in bodies. Causing great suffering and trauma to anyone wounded. Which is why today a lot of soldiers can survive from gunshot wounds. Whereas the lead Minié balls of the American Civil War did horrific damage to tissue and bone. Shattering bone such that any arm or leg wound typically resulted in an amputation. And a belly wound meant death. For it just did so much damage to the internal organs that there was no repairing them. Much like another horrific belly wound. From a bayonet. As it made a long, wide wound. Often running in one side of a man and out the other. And doing irreparable damage.
Even today a knife wound can cause more damage than a bullet. Because it makes such a large hole through a body. Making long and deep cuts in internal organs. Also, a person has to be close to use a knife. He can’t stab someone from a distance. Like you can shoot someone with a gun from a distance. So anyone willing to stab someone is pretty cold-blooded. As you see, hear and feel a person’s death. And anyone that can do that is a very dangerous person. Especially with our lax knife-control laws (see Two dead, two wounded in separate GTA stabbings by Chris Doucette posted 2/13/2014 on the Toronto Sun).
TORONTO – Two men were killed and two others were wounded in three separate stabbings within hours of each other in the GTA [Greater Toronto Area].
The bloodshed began just after 9 p.m. Wednesday in Rexdale, Toronto Police said, and it kept emergency responders busy for several hours.
Every time there is a shooting in the United States the left calls for stricter gun-control legislation. As if that would remove all violent crime in the country. Because if a person can’t get a gun that person can’t shoot anyone with a gun. And they would never think about picking up a knife to harm someone. Which would leave the bad guys with nothing to do but to link arms and sing Kumbaya. Like they do in Canada. Well, everyone in Canada but those picking up knives to stab people. Funny how in Canada they don’t blame knives for these crimes. Or demand more restrictive knife-control legislation in Canada every time someone gets stabbed. Like some Americans blame guns for gun crimes in the United States. And try to restrict gun ownership every chance they get.
Tags: bullet, gun, gun control, gun control legislation, gun crime, knife, knife wound, knives, shooting, stabbing
Week in Review
There is a line on the sit-com The Big Bang Theory where Leonard warns someone that Sheldon is one lab accident away from being a super-villain. Here’s what Wikipedia says about Sheldon.
Sheldon exhibits a strict adherence to routine, a total lack of social skills, a tenuous understanding of humor, a general lack of humility or empathy, and displays textbook narcissistic behavior. He also has a very hard time recognizing irony and sarcasm in other people although he himself often employs them… Despite speculation that Sheldon’s personality traits may be consistent with Asperger syndrome, obsessive–compulsive personality disorder and asexuality, co-creator Bill Prady has repeatedly stated that Sheldon’s character was neither conceived nor developed with regard to any of these conditions.
The Big Bang Theory is a comedy. And Jim Parsons plays Sheldon brilliantly. He’s hilarious. But what the show jokes about can be a real danger. As a person with exceptional intelligence suffering from these mental health issues can become dangerous. And the further from reality they drift the more dangerous they can become (see Newtown killer had occasionally violent tendencies by Larry Copeland posted 12/27/2013 on USA Today).
The mentally troubled gunman in the Newtown massacre had obsessive behavior, changing his socks as many as 20 times a day, and his mother tried to manage her life around the bizarre quirks of her son, according to thousands of pages of documents released by Connecticut State Police on Friday…
He had apparently displayed signs of the potential for violent behavior to at least one former teacher…
One of Lanza’s former teachers told investigators that the shooter was anti-social and that he rarely interacted with other students.
“I remember giving creative writing assignments to students instructing them to write a page or two on whatever they wanted to talk about,” she said. “Adam would write ten pages, obsessing about battles, destruction and war. In my years of experience, I have known (redacted) grade boys to talk about things like this, but Adam’s level of violence was disturbing. I remember showing the writings to the Principal at the time. Adam’s creative writing was so graphic that it could not be shared…”
One witness, a man who told police he’d known Nancy Lanza for about two years, said he was aware that Lanza “suffered from Asperger Syndrome…
Another witness told police that Nancy “had taken him out of school because he was sensitive to sound and light.” A nurse told investigators that Nancy Lanza had to do three loads of laundry a day because Adam Lanza obsessively changed his clothes, sometimes changing his socks 20 times a day…
“(The witness) said that Nancy Lanza told him she had no intentions of re-marrying and accepted the obligations of caring for Adam. Nancy said that she and Adam planned for her trip to New Hampshire. The trip was an experiment to allow Adam to stay at home alone for a few days.”
As soon as the Newtown massacre hit the media the left was calling for new gun control legislation. Even before they knew who Adam Lanza was. Or the extent of his mental issues. And they were extensive. This kid should have been institutionalized. His mother resigned herself to living the rest of her life taking care of him. Probably because that was the only option available to her. As it can be difficult to commit someone until they have proven to be a danger to the public. Something that is typically proven by committing an act that harms someone. Of course by that time it’s too late. As in the case of Adam Lanza. James Holmes (2012 Aurora shooting). Jared Loughner (2011 Tucson supermarket massacre). Seung-Hui Cho (Virginia Tech Massacre).
Were the guns to blame? Or the madmen firing the guns? A lot of people own guns. But very few of them commit massacres. Perhaps the better question is this. If guns were unavailable to these people would they have still found a way to kill? As smart as they were? Or would these ‘super-villains’ have just said, “Oh well. No guns available so I guess it’s sanity for me.” And walk away from their delusions? Or would they think of another way?
Taking guns away won’t stop these people from hurting others. They may have just used their intelligence to think of another way. Perhaps one more deadly than shooting people one at a time. Identifying them early and institutionalizing them would work better. For if they were institutionalized they wouldn’t be able to hurt anyone. With a gun. Or with anything else their intelligence dreamt up.
Tags: Adam Lanza, anti-social, Asperger syndrome, intelligence, massacre, mental health issues, Newtown, Newtown massacre, obsessive–compulsive, violent behavior
Week in Review
Liberals win elections because they have friends in powerful places. Our public schools. Our universities. The main street media. Television. And, of course, Hollywood. As a percentage of the population we’re only talking about 21% of the people. But these friends have powerful soapboxes. Making their minority views sound like majority opinion. Such as their hatred of gun ownership. And their desire for gun control legislation. Despite their love of guns. And gun violence (see Blame Washington, Not Hollywood, For R-Rated Violence In PG-13 Films by Scott Mendelson posted 11/14/2013 on Forbes).
“If (studios) are prevented from freely advertising R-rated films, they will simply find ways to allow more and more “objectionable” material into PG-13 rated films.” – Me, in May, 2001
Well, it’s finally happened. After over a decade of studios stuffing more and more R-rated content, specifically R-rated violence, into PG-13 movies, we’ve reached the point where PG-13 films actually have more gun violence than R-rated films. There has been a lot of hand-wringing about the study which will be published in the December issue of Pediatrics, but almost none of them are looking at the real issue. This isn’t some conspiracy by Hollywood to fill our kids’ heads with images of no-harm/no-foul gun play. It’s the logical end-result of a 2001 bill spearheaded by Joe Leiberman and nearly passed into law that would have given the Federal Trade Commission the power to regulate how R-rated films were marketed. And frankly I tried to warn anyone who would listen nearly thirteen years ago.
They may want to take away guns from law-abiding gun owners but they sure love to play with them in the movies. A lot. For there is nothing more fun than shooting up people. Apparently. And their gun fun on screen has inspired videogames where kids can mimic what they see in the movies. And go on shooting sprees of their own. Sometimes, though, they do it in real life. Why? Is it because law-abiding people can buy and own guns? Or is it because they like what they see in the movies so much that they want to do the same in their videogames? And when that bores them, a few of them want to do it for real? To bring that movie or videogame to life?
Those who do typically suffer from some mental health issues. But that doesn’t stop them from enjoying those gory movies. And those gory videogames. For many of our mass shooters were avid gamers. Hollywood and videogames may not be totally to blame. But they are probably more to blame than law-abiding gun owners. So if they really want to end gun violence perhaps they should look at what they’re doing more and at responsible gun owners less.
Tags: gun control, gun ownership, gun violence, guns, Hollywood, law-abiding gun owners, PG-13 rated films, R-rated films, videogame, violence
Week in Review
Every time there is a killing involving a gun the left tries to revive the gun control debate. But they say nothing about box cutters (see Teen ‘infatuated’ with murdered teacher by Bob Fredericks posted 10/24/2013 on the New York Post).
The 14-year old accused of fatally slashing pretty math teacher Colleen Ritzer may have been infatuated with her and snapped when she spurned his advances, according to a new report Thursday…
Chism confessed to cops that he slashed her throat with a box cutter after following her into a women’s restroom at the school, a Boston TV station reported Thursday.
Or knives (see 5 Dead in Brooklyn Stabbing by EMMA G. FITZSIMMONS posted 10/27/2013 on The New York Times).
Five people were killed in a stabbing in Brooklyn on Saturday night, officials said.
Does the left try to restrict box-cutter and knife ownership? No. Yet there were probably more knife deaths in New York this past week than gun deaths. Of course they would say it wasn’t the box-cutter or the knife that killed these people. It was the people using these implements that killed these people. For the vast majority of box-cutter owners and knife owners use these cutting implements responsibly. Just like gun owners. But gun owners will never get that consideration.
If these victims had a gun these grisly murders might not have been. For a gun takes away the advantage of a bigger and stronger assailant. So someone of a smaller physical stature doesn’t have to be a victim. And it lets them engage a person with a knife BEFORE the knife-wielding attacker can get close enough to use that knife. Giving the advantage to the defender in a knife attack. Which gun control legislation will take away. Giving the advantage back to the bad guy.
Tags: box cutters, gun, gun control, gun control legislation, gun deaths, knife deaths, knives
Week in Review
The left hates guns. They want to take away our guns. And repeal the Second Amendment. Which is why they exploit every tragedy that involves a gun that they can. (Except for the horrible gun crimes in Chicago that rarely receive any media attention.) To foment anti-gun sentiment. And it’s been working. For the America people believe that gun crime is out of control (see Mass shootings are up; gun murders down posted 9/21/2013 on The Economist).
On September 16th a former navy reservist, Aaron Alexis, shot 12 people dead at a military base in Washington, DC. Though rare, such tragedies are increasingly common in America. The past 30 years have seen 67 mass shootings (in which four or more people were killed by a gunman not involved in a conventional crime), says Mother Jones magazine. There have already been five this year, after seven last year. Massacres grab headlines, and so may explain why many Americans believe, incorrectly, that gun crime is on the rise. In fact, gun murders have fallen by half in the past 20 years.
In 2012 there were about 500 people shot to death in Chicago. Which receives scant news coverage. But every time there is a mass shooting (Sandy Hook, Aurora, Tucson, Virginia Tech) it is not only front-page news but there are calls for new gun control legislation. Because gun crime is out of control in America. This is the narrative. And why the left loves mass-shootings. For it inflames the people to perhaps accept something they don’t want in the heat of the moment. Further gun control legislation.
But gun crime is not out of control. Apart from the Democrat-controlled Chicago. Actual “gun murders have fallen by half in the past 20 years.” Despite Sandy Hook, Aurora, Tucson, Virginia Tech. But you wouldn’t know that listening to the Democrats. As they are apparently lying to the American people to take away our guns. Which begs the question. Why? If gun crime is actually falling then why do they want to take away our guns?
Tags: Aurora, Chicago, Democrats, gun control, gun control legislation, gun crime, guns, mass shooting, Sandy Hook, Tucson, Virginia Tech
Week in Review
Canada has stricter gun laws than the United States. The American left would love to have some of their laws. For there is simply too much gun crime in the United States. From mentally unsound people killing people because of voices in their heads. To murder/suicides that would simply not be possible if there was not a gun in the house (see Two dead after stabbing at Keele and Eglinton apartment building by Canadian Press posted 9/13/2013 on the National Post).
Toronto police are investigating a possible murder-suicide at an apartment building in the city’s northwest.
Officers went to the building (near Keele Street and Eglinton Avenue West) at about 7:30 a.m. Friday after neighbours called 911 to report a woman was found with stab wounds in the hallway…
Officers located the body of the man outside the rear of the building.
The United Kingdom also has strict gun laws. And a knife-crime problem. For it would appear taking guns away from people does not prevent people from killing other people. Or themselves.
While a small percentage of any population may own a gun pretty much 100% of the population owns a knife. Except, perhaps, the person living alone who never cooks. And these instruments of death are often on full display in people’s kitchens. In a big block of wood on the kitchen counter. With the handle conveniently sticking out for anyone to walk by and grab. A child. An intruder. Or a homicidal spouse.
But we don’t hear the same concern for knife-crime as we do for gun-crime. Possibly because killing with a knife requires someone to get up close and personal to someone. Unlike a gun. Which can be fired safely from a distance. Which gives a woman a better chance of defending herself from someone trying to harm her. Because if she used a knife she would have to get close enough to her assailant that her assailant could probably take her knife away. And perhaps use it on her.
Unless a woman has been trained in hand-to-hand fighting she will likely lose in a knife fight. While her odds of winning a gun fight are just as good as her assailant. That’s what a gun does. It lets someone who is greatly out-muscled to defend herself. And in this day and age where more and more women are living alone and raising their children alone perhaps they would like to even the odds with any would-be assailant. And own a handgun with a large capacity clip. So she doesn’t have to fight hand-to-hand to save her life. Against someone twice her size.
Tags: gun crime, gun laws, guns, hand-to-hand fighting, knife, knife crime, murder-suicide, Toronto
Week in Review
Every time someone dies from a gunshot the left screams we have to do something to get these guns out of the hands of people. For if people didn’t have guns no one would die. Because it’s not people killing people with guns. It’s the guns that are killing people. And the people shooting the guns just happen to be there.
This is the logic on the left. But yet when kids die in hot cars or because of the neglect of stoned parents they don’t say anything about getting rid of cars. Or getting rid of drugs (see Hot Car Baby Death: ‘Joint-Smoking Dad’ Charged posted 8/30/2013 on Sky News).
A father has been accused of leaving his baby to suffocate in a parked car in temperatures of 100F, as he smoked cannabis in a sports bar…
It was thought Gray was distracted and forgot about the boy.
But Mr Thompson said police later came to suspect Gray was smoking cannabis with a work companion during the time his son was in the vehicle.
Outside temperatures were about 100 degrees, but interior car temperatures are frequently much higher.
Parents sometimes forget about a child in the back seat of a car. Usually when there is a change in routine. People soon forget in their busy life that today they have the child. Then accidents happen. And the Democrats are to blame.
The cost of the welfare state has made it hard for a single income to raise a family. Which is why children are spending so much time in cars. Getting shuttled between childcare and home. Like laundry going to and from the cleaners. Just another chore to tend to. Because taxes are so high today that a parent can’t stay at home to raise their children. They have to get back to work as soon as they can.
And it’s been the Democrats who have been for the decriminalization of marijuana. For two reasons. A lot the hippies from the Sixties who spent their time then getting high still like to light up to get high. When they’re not busy writing the curriculum for our children’s schools. And it’s a great way to get the youth vote. By being everything a kid’s parents are not. Sure, kid, sex and getting high are okay. You vote for us and we’ll make sex and drugs a simpler part of your life. But how many frizzled parents do we want out there getting high when they drive? With their child in the back seat? No. Nothing good can come from making it easier to drive and smoke marijuana.
If it saves just one child then it’s worth doing. That’s what they say about restrictions on gun ownership. And if it’s good for guns than it must be good for marijuana. It needs to be banned. For the children.
Tags: cannabis, child, Democrats, drugs, guns, marijuana, parent, parked car
« Previous Entries