Filthy, Stinking Hippies never Liked Income Disparity. Or Real Work.
Say you’re a server at a nice restaurant. And you’re really good. People ask to sit in your section. For your prompt and courteous service. And they show their appreciation. With big tips. And frequent trips to the restaurant. Good food. And great service. It’s what makes a restaurant successful.
Now let’s say the restaurant owners retire and turn over the business to their children. And let’s say they’re liberal Democrats. Children of the Sixties. Hippies. Filthy, stinking hippies. And still are. Though they may bathe more these days. Anyway, they take over the exploitation of the working class in this bourgeois restaurant. (They see all business in these terms.) And they’re going to make some changes.
They never liked the income disparity they saw between the servers. (Or real work for that matter.) And they don’t like you. Because you’re getting more in tips than the other servers. And that just isn’t fair. You’re just lucky to get better tables. As if you won some lottery in life. It’s only blind, dumb luck that makes you the high earner in the restaurant. So they’re going to level the playing field. Make it fair for everyone. Not just for the rich. You. But for everyone. From now on all tips go into a jar. And at the end of the day they will divide those tips evenly between all servers. Everything fair. And everyone happy.
People don’t Approve of Slavery and Prefer to Keep the Fruits of Their Labor
Or so they would believe. Because you’re not going to be happy, are you? I mean, you know why you made more in tips. You provided exceptional service. And your reward for your hard work? A punitive tax. They’re going to share part of your tips with the less exceptional servers. So what will you do?
I’m guessing that you’re not going to say, “Vive la revolución.” And work even harder. Instead I’m betting that you will be looking for a new job. At a restaurant that rewards hard work. And if there are no other food service jobs available? Because liberal Democrats are in power? And they’ve killed the economy? Well, then, you just won’t work as hard. Because you don’t approve of slavery. Having the fruits of your labors given to others.
So the new owners, the filthy, stinking hippies, will lose their best server. And soon will notice a steady decline in the quality of service. For their servers quickly learn that working harder doesn’t mean any more pay. So they don’t. Work harder. Food sits in the kitchen longer. By the time they serve it to the customers it’s lukewarm. They don’t refill drinks. Customers begin to complain. Even about the quality of the lukewarm food. The executive chef quits. Business drops off. The business goes into debt. Losing some $10,000 each month. And things get so bad under the new owners that not even Robert Irvine could save this restaurant.
The new owners thought their way was going to make a better work environment for their employees. But the only workers who liked the new policies and stayed were their worst employees. All the good ones quit. And those who remained lost their jobs eventually as the business finally went under. So everyone in the end lost. Because these hippies thought they knew what was best for everyone.
Accidents Sometimes Happen when Men Control Complex Machines
So bad ideology has unintended consequences. But complex systems to simplify complex things also have unintended consequences.
The modern jetliner is a complex machine. They can literally take off, fly and land themselves. But don’t. Pilots still take off. And land. But the other 99% of the time these aircraft fly themselves. Pilots input data into the flight computers. And the computers fly the aircraft.
So pilots don’t fly as much as they used to. They log a lot of hours in the cockpit. But they’re not really flying. They’re operating computers. Pushing buttons. Turning dials. And communicating with air traffic controllers. They’re not ‘connected’ to the aircraft like in the old days. Fly-by-wire technology insulates the pilot from the flight controls. The days of stick and rudder are gone. When a pilot was one with the aircraft. Through constant feedback via the senses. Flying by the seat of the pants. When a hand on the steering column told a pilot how the plane was flying. Even while on autopilot. While having a conversation with a flight attendant standing in the cockpit door.
Back then you needed far more piloting skills than you do today. Because there were no flight computers. Like they have today. That’s why a lot of pilots came out of the military. Because the military pushed pilots in their training. Taught them to fly through anything that can happen while flying. Including recovering from a stall. Something that just doesn’t typically happen in a modern jetliner these days.
Pilot error has accounted for the majority of accidents. So removing the pilot from the ‘flying part’ of flying an airplane made sense. And it would make aviation safer. And it has. This is not to criticize pilots. It just shows that accidents sometimes happen when men control complex machines. So reducing the amount of time the pilot is in control of the aircraft makes them safer. That is, as long as the computers have good data.
The Safer You Make Flying by Removing the Pilot from the Flying the less Skilled Pilots Become
And that’s a problem. Sometimes the computers don’t have good data. For various reasons. Such as iced up airspeed sensing pitot probes. Which has happened a few times. Giving false airspeed data. Or sometimes conflicting airspeed data. There’s more than one probe. And different flight computers get their airspeed from different probes. One could show a dangerous high airspeed. Another can show the actual airspeed. Giving a pilot a bit of a problem. Which is compounded if that pilot spent more time inputting data to a computer than flying. Because when computers get bad data they often disengage. And the modern pilot will spend most of his or her time trying to reengage it. Instead of flying the airplane. As they are trained to do. Because it’s safer.
A dangerous high airspeed indicates that the plane may be accelerating. Past its maximum airspeed rating. Which could make the plane break up in flight. So a pilot may pull back the engine throttles. To slow the plane. To keep it from breaking up in flight. Of course, if that was an erroneous airspeed, the pilot will only slow the plane down. And perhaps cause it to stall. And that has happened, too.
A plane has a ‘stick shaker‘ to warn the pilot of a potential stall. Normally after you get a stick shake you push the yoke forward to lower the nose and pick up speed. Of course, if you just got an over-speed warning you might not do this. And you may interpret that stick-shake as buffeting from the plane just before it breaks up in flight. So you may raise the nose. And pull the throttle levers back. To slow the plane down. And that’s exactly what you will do. Slow the plane down. Right into a stall. Which is flying too slowly to create lift with the wings. And once the plane stalls it will just fall out of the sky.
There’s a tradeoff in aviation. The safer you make flying by removing the pilot from the flying the less skilled pilots become. So when something happens, such as an erroneous airspeed indication, their initial reaction is to fix the computer. Not fly the airplane. And planes have fallen out of the sky because of this. Because even the simple problems don’t have a lot of time to fix. An old-school pilot who flew B-52s, on the other hand, would probably say something like this. “Hot damn. The idiot box is broken. Now I get to fly this son-a-bitch.”
When Legislation goes Wrong those in Government Simply Say they had Nothing but the Best Intentions
Every time you try to make something too complex. Or try to change human behavior. You are going to get unintended consequences. Always. Because complex things are complex. And people are like snowflakes. No two are alike. And it is the height of arrogance to believe that you know an individual better than they know themselves. Or that ‘one size’ fits all when it comes to solutions.
But that’s government. Complex. And where the few think for the many. And decide what’s best for them. This is a recipe for unintended consequences. Which is why so much of their legislation goes wrong. And when it does they simply say they had nothing but the best intentions.
Of course, you see what good intentions can do in a restaurant. Or in a jetliner at 30,000 feet.