Christians believe in the Reward of Hard Work and Shun Idleness for it tends to Invite Trouble
Liberals are very confident people. As well as arrogant. Narcissistic. And condescending. Which is why they are so secular. Wanting to take the separation of church and state argument to the extreme. Attacking and mocking Christianity every chance they get. As they don’t like anyone judging them. Or setting some moral standard. For liberals are a sinful people.
The Seven Deadly Sins are wrath, greed, sloth, pride, lust, envy, and gluttony. Christians try to avoid these. They forgive their enemies instead of getting angry at them. They tithe to their church instead of keeping all of their money greedily for themselves. They believe in the reward of hard work and shun idleness for it tends to invite trouble. They are humble and don’t strive for attention. They have strong self-control and make sacrifices for a better future instead of giving in to current wants and desires. They tend to be happy with what they have however modest their lives may be. Instead of being envious of others. They don’t eat, drink or live to excess, preferring to do everything in moderation. Things you just don’t associate with liberals.
Now think of some liberals you know of. Think of the vicious things liberal Democrats say about Republicans (such as a campaign commercial showing a Republican pushing ‘Grandma’ off a cliff). The vulgar things some liberal commentators say about Republican women. And the ridicule of conservatives on late-night television. Rich liberals who want to raise taxes on the rich (which includes the middle class) to pay for a generous welfare state while giving little to charity themselves. As they are far more generous with other people’s money than with their own. And never risk their own money in risky investments such as Solyndra. Preferring to risk the taxpayers’ money.
Liberals attack the Rich because they are Envious of their Hard Work and Success
Liberals always want a bigger federal government with an ever-growing bureaucracy. So they can be career politicians without ever getting a real job where they have to work hard to earn a living. Liberals like to brag about how smart they are and how brilliant their legislation is. Taking credit for things they didn’t even do. Such as President Obama taking credit for the surge in natural gas production done on private land by private companies. Or boasting how their economic policies are working even though the real unemployment rate is in excess of 13% (when you count those who have left the labor force and those who can only find a part-time job). And their refusal to admit they wrote a terrible law. Such as Obamacare.
Liberals never want to wait for anything. They don’t believe in hard work. They believe in early retirement and generous pensions. For their friends in the union. Like the UAW. In the public sector unions. And those in government jobs. They attack the rich because they resent their hard work and success. Are envious of them. And want to punish them because they were never as good as they are. With higher tax rates. And punishing regulations. Hollywood celebrities and the Washington elite live the most extravagant lives. In some of the most expensive homes which are filled with the finest food, drink and toys. And when that’s not enough some further their excess with drugs.
These are things you just don’t associate with Christians. In fact, these are things Christians frown upon. Even telling their congregation not to live lives like these in their church services. For these are not Christian lives. Some people could have everything they could possibly want or desire but are still not happy. Or are bored because it came too easily. Or too soon. Turning to other outlets to excite them. Alcohol and drugs. Drag-racing in expensive sports cars on neighborhood streets. Partying all night in the hottest clubs. Or blowing a lot of money gambling. Anything to escape the boredom of an idle life.
For a Better Life we should Shun Liberalism and Embrace Free Market Capitalism
This is why liberals attack Christianity so much. As well as one other reason. Because they don’t like believing in a higher being. For they are so arrogant and narcissistic that they can’t stand the thought of some being that is greater than themselves. For they hold liberalism sacred. And if anyone worships anything they want the people to worship them. Because they believe they are the smartest and the most insightful people in the universe. Yes, vanity, thy name is liberalism. Which is why they believe they should control government. And our lives. Because they’re smarter and wiser than business owners. Bankers. Entrepreneurs. And market forces. For they are the higher being. Not what those silly Christians worship.
A lot of people have felt like this throughout history. Adolf Hitler. Mao Zedong. Saddam Hussein. Benito Mussolini. Muammar Gaddafi. Kim Il-sung. Kim Jong-il. Kim Jong-un. Fidel Castro. Supreme leaders and ruthless dictators who preferred their people to worship them like a god. And imposed socialism, fascism or communism on their people. Using their supreme intelligence and insight to make the state a better place for the people. Making the state supreme. While subordinating the individual. And elevating the supreme leader above everyone. Something liberals have been trying to do all their lives. Only without the torture and genocide.
But their efforts share a similar trend with these ruthless dictators. The quality of life declines under their rule. Some of the worst places to live when it comes to human rights have been in Nazi Germany, the People’s Republic of China, Iraq, Fascist Italy, Libya, North Korea and Cuba. While some of the best countries to live in are the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia and Hong Kong. All once part of the Christian British Empire. An empire that embraced free market capitalism. And when people practice self-control and make sacrifices for the future engage in free market capitalism they make a better place to live. At least this is what history has shown us. So if we want a better life we should shun liberalism. And embrace free market capitalism. For liberty, thy name is capitalism.
Tags: arrogant, capitalism, Christianity, Christians, conservatives, Democrats, dictators, drugs, envious, excess, free market, free-market capitalism, hard work, higher being, human rights, idle life, liberalism, liberals, liberty, narcissistic, Republicans, sacrifice, self-control, sin, vanity
The Heart we see on Valentine’s Day is actually a Woman’s Butt as she Bends Over
We have locker rooms for women. And locker rooms for men. Because we want an environment where women feel comfortable and safe to undress in. To be stripped to their underwear in. Where they can walk around nude. And shower naked. Things most people—men included—don’t feel comfortable doing in front of other people. Especially people of the opposite sex.
We’ve seen a man talking to a pretty and buxom lady in many a television show and movie. With the man’s eyes meandering down to the woman’s ample breasts. In fact, we’ve seen some men in extreme discomfort as they try NOT to look. Especially when a woman’s boobs are straining the buttons on her blouse. Or she’s showing a lot of cleavage. Those who are caught looking may hear an angry “Hey, buddy, my eyes are up here!”
But it’s just not breasts that attract a man’s gaze. Men like to watch women from behind, too. Watching their pert behinds as they sashay by. A woman can sometimes feel those eyes on her derriere. And may respond with an exasperated, “Stop looking at my ass!” But men have long enjoyed looking at a woman’s posterior. So much so that the heart we see on Valentine’s Day—the symbol of love—is actually a woman’s butt as she bends over.
Seeing a Penis in the Women’s Locker Room will no doubt make some Women Uncomfortable
For these reasons women get their own locker rooms and restrooms. So they don’t have to feel those unwelcomed gazes in their most personal moments. Or feel embarrassed about their bodies should they not look like Playboy playmates. And so a woman doesn’t have to worry about sexual assault in the locker room if she’s the only woman in there undressing in front of a group of men.
Even the Army understands these concerns women have while undressed. So much so that they don’t even make them undress in front of other women. The men may have to stand in a line and strip down to their underwear, bend over and grab their ankles for a very public rectal exam (see Women to Serve in Combat despite having Lower Physical Standards and Private Rectal Exams in Training posted 2/9/2014 on PITHOCRATES). But not the women. No, the women will enjoy bending over only in front of the doctor. While in a private room.
So we give women an environment where they can feel safe. And not where people can look at them in all of their nakedness with who knows what on their minds. Especially in high schools. And colleges. Because we all know what college boys have on their minds. So we keep anyone with a penis out of the women’s locker room. Unless that person with a penis is transgendered (see California law lets transgender students pick bathrooms, teams to join by Holly Yan posted 8/13/2013 on CNN). Which no doubt will make some women uncomfortable. Taking off their clothes and standing naked next to someone who undresses and reveals a penis. A woman’s normal reaction would be to quickly cover up her nakedness. And call for help. Is she supposed to feel comfortable and relaxed to be naked next to someone who claims to be a woman even though that someone has a penis? At the least she may be thinking “is this person for real? Or is this just a clever way to see me naked?”
The first Openly Gay Player in the NFL will go out of his way not to “Gay it Up”
Athletes are some of the most physically fit people in the world. And some of the most attractive. Men and women. Which is why there’s a lot of stuff happening in those Olympic villages between or after the events. The great Italian, Alberto Tomba, not only had great skills on the slopes. But he had great skills off the slopes. As he was quite the ladies’ man. And today’s technology just makes it easier to hook up in the Olympic village (see Tinder Hook-Ups Off the Hook Among Sochi Athletes posted 2/12/2014 on ABC News).
The social networking tool may be new since the last Winter Olympics, but with 3,000 athletes in the prime of their lives from around the world packed into Sochi, they’re bound to seek an outlet through electronic means or otherwise.
“It’s like making the ingredients of a huge stew – a stew of sexual ingredients,” said Dr. Judy Kuriansky, a sex therapist and clinical psychologist at Columbia University’s Teachers College in New York City. “There is stress, which causes tension, and anxiety and energy, and a massive outpouring of chemicals in the body – adrenaline and endorphins. It’s a powerful concoction of chemicals.”
“Everyone knows the runner’s high,” she said. “Olympian athletes certainly have it – it’s orgasmic.”
Kuriansky said all the beautiful and fit athletes tend not to “think about their conscience.”
“Winners or losers, on top of the world or devastated, it tends to make you grab the moment – carpe diem,” she said. “This is your moment.”
Professional athletes are in the prime of their sexual lives, too. And it’s just not the quarterback of the football team getting the pretty ladies. For when you’re this fit and at the top of your game the ladies come to you. Which is probably why the NFL cheerleaders don’t share a locker room with the NFL players. Manly men and beautiful women together undressed in the prime of their sexual lives? In a stew of sexual ingredients? That massive outpouring of adrenaline and endorphins? No, putting penises and vaginas together in that boiling stew may lead to something orgasmic. Which may distract from the game.
We now have the first openly gay player about to enter the NFL draft. And despite being a professional athlete in the prime of his sexual life he will not even notice the naked men in the locker room he shares. Just as a college boy could share the women’s locker room and not notice the undressed women. Just as an NFL player could share the cheerleader locker room and not notice their glorious naked bodies. And no one will ever have to say, “Hey, my eyes are up here.” Or “stop looking at my ass.”
A gay man may find an NFL locker room heaven to be in (based on the number of search results for ‘gay porn scenes in a locker room’). Just as a straight man would find it heaven to be invited into an NFL cheerleader locker room (based on all those R-rated movies where guys are spying on or sneaking into the girls’ locker room). But not a gay NFL player. No. He will be a professional. At all times. Because he will be the first openly gay player in the NFL. He will go out of his way not to ‘gay it up’ to borrow a line from Stephen Colbert. He may make some players uncomfortable. But after a few games that will go away. No one will feel threatened in the locker room. But he will still be a great distraction. For Tim Tebow won the Heisman Trophy yet he plays for no NFL team. Not even as a backup quarterback. Why? Well, part of the reason is they say his style of play does not translate well to the NFL. But there is another reason. Because of the distraction he is. He was getting a lot of press for his Christian beliefs. And his ‘Tebowing’ after a touchdown. He was just too Christian. And too big of a distraction from the game (he even had groupies). Just as having a gay player in an NFL locker room will be. For the team that picks him will no doubt spend a lot of their time talking about having the first openly gay player in the NFL. And should he not do well in the NFL imagine that head coach explaining to the press why he cut the first gay NFL player from his team. This will be the great distraction. The media wanting to know if he’s a distraction.
Tags: adrenaline, athletes, cheerleaders, distraction, endorphins, gay it up, locker room, men, my eyes are up here, NFL, NFL cheerleaders, NFL players, openly gay NFL player, stop looking at my ass, Tim Tebow, transgender, uncomfortable, undress, women
Having Government remake our Health Care System is not the Limited Government of our Founding Fathers
According to a Gallup poll approximately 38% of people identify themselves as conservative while only 23% identify themselves as liberal (see Liberal Self-Identification Edges Up to New High in 2013 by Jeffrey M. Jones posted 1/10/2014 on Gallup). With most of the rest (34%) identifying themselves as moderate. Or, in other words, 77% of the people do NOT identify themselves as liberal. That’s over three-quarters of the population. Which means if you were in a group of four people only one of the four would be a liberal.
And yet we have Obamacare. Thanks to the Affordable Care Act passed on partisan lines when the Democrats controlled both chambers of Congress. The most liberal change to our health care system (the government will charge people a fine/tax if they don’t buy health insurance). The only time in history that government has forced people to buy something against their will. Without having any kind of say in the matter. Like we do with car insurance. If you don’t want to buy car insurance all you have to do is NOT drive a car. But with Obamacare there is no choice. Everyone has to buy health insurance. Period.
Having government remake our health care system is not the limited government of our Founding Fathers. It is actually more in keeping with a royal decree issued by the king the Founding Fathers fought for their independence from. Ye shall do this. For the ruler has spoken. And ye shall pay more taxes to fund this huge growth of government. Another thing not in keeping with our Founding Fathers. Higher taxes. So how have we come to this when 77% of the people don’t want any of this? Because liberals are some of the best liars in the world. That’s how.
Discounted Reimbursements are causing Doctors and Hospitals to leave the Obamacare Network
To make Obamacare work they needed to get people to pay more for their health insurance. So they could raise a lot of money to subsidize health insurance for those who could not afford to buy it. Which they couldn’t do if people kept the policies they liked and wanted to keep. Especially those lower-cost ones. So they made the policies people liked and wanted to keep noncompliant with the Affordable Care Act. Forcing their insurers to cancel them. And forcing people to buy more costly policies. This providing the subsidy money Obamacare needed.
So this was the plan. To cause mass cancellations. And then force those people with cancelled policies to buy more expensive policies. But this was only part of the formula. To keep more of those higher insurance premiums they also raised deductibles. So not only did people pay more for their health insurance policies. Those policies paid for less. Forcing people to spend a lot more out-of-pocket before their insurance kicked in.
We have huge budget deficits. And growing national debt. A big part of that debt is from Medicare and Medicaid (and Social Security). Getting people to pay for other people’s health insurance won’t cut these costs. But there is something that will, though. The same thing the government is doing with Medicare. Pay doctors and hospitals less. By discounting their reimbursements. It worked pretty well with Medicare. So they were sure it would work well with Obamacare. Of course, health care providers overcharged private insurers to recoup what the government didn’t pay. So this will no longer be an option under Obamacare. Which has caused a lot of doctors and hospitals to already leave the Obamacare network.
People would rather hear a Pleasant Lie than an Unpleasant Truth
There was a lot if opposition to the Affordable Care Act. For the people did not want national health care. And they felt that was where Obamacare would lead to. So President Obama told people in person. And looked into the camera. Making a promise to the American people. “If you like your health care plan you can keep your health care plan. If you like your doctor you can keep your doctor. If you like your hospital you can keep your hospital. Period. No one was going to take these away from you. All we’re going to do is give you better health insurance while saving the average family $2,500 on their annual insurance premium.” None of which was true.
Of course, had the president told the truth he would only have confirmed everyone’s fears. Which is why he lied. A lie so big PolitiFact named it the Lie of the Year. And he told the lie so easily. He was so reassuring that the people believed him. In fact, they wanted to believe him. For they liked this president. And they trusted him. Despite his economic policies having failed to produce a strong economic recovery. For even when polls showed the people thought his policies were taking the country in the wrong direction the people still liked him. Because he tried. Always saying things the people wanted to hear. A lot of feel-good things. Affordable health care for everyone. Leveling the playing field. Making the rich pay their fair share. Free birth control. Not enforcing federal drug laws in Colorado and Washington. With talk like that no wonder the people liked him. And why it was so easy for him to lie to the people. As they were willing to believe just about anything he said.
President Obama is everything our parents aren’t. Who tell us what we need to do. What we should do. And what we shouldn’t do. Regular killjoys. Unlike the president. And the Democrats. Who don’t mind people having a little fun in their lives. Unlike the Republicans. Who are as bad as our parents. Always telling us things we don’t want to hear. Like truths. Facts. And how things are. Reality. While the president and the Democrats tell us how things could be. How life can be more fun and more carefree their way. Whereas life requires a lot of hard work and sacrifice the Republicans’ way. Because reality can suck. Which is why some people use intoxicants to escape it. Or vote Democrat. Willing to accept on faith their fictional
alternative to escape reality. For it turns out people would rather hear a pleasant lie than an unpleasant truth. And people will like you if you tell them pleasant lies. While they won’t like you very much if you tell them unpleasant truths. Which is why good liars can make anyone like them while those who don’t lie can’t. This is why people didn’t like Mitt Romney. He told the truth. And why people liked President Obama. Because he told them what they wanted to hear. Such as things like the Lie of the Year.
Tags: Affordable Care Act, conservative, deductibles, Democrats, discounting, doctor, Founding Fathers, health care plan, health insurance, hospital, If you like your health care plan, insurance premium, liberal, lie, lie of the year, limited government, Medicare, Obamacare, pleasant lie, policies, premiums, President Obama, reimbursement, subsidy, taxes, truth, unpleasant truth
McDonald’s is one of the Few Places that will hire an Unskilled and Inexperienced Person
Teenagers want a lot of things. A car. A smartphone. Nice clothes. Popularity. Fame. But one thing you’ve never heard a teenager says is this. “I love working at McDonald’s. I wish I could work here forever. If only they would raise the minimum wage so I could.”
A lot of teenagers work at McDonald’s. Why? Because it’s one of the few places that will hire an unskilled and inexperienced person. Because a job at McDonald’s is an entry-level job for a teenager new to the workforce. A place they can earn a paycheck without having the ability to do anything. Where they are taught everything they need to know on the job. While McDonald’s pays them to learn.
Some teens will work enthusiastically at McDonald’s. Enjoying their first job. And earning their first paycheck. So they don’t have to depend on Mom and Dad to buy them what they want anymore. While others hate these jobs. And refer to them derisively as ‘hamburger flipper jobs’. They don’t want them. And those who do work there do so reluctantly as they are a lot like that teenager. They are unskilled and inexperienced in doing anything else but an entry-level job.
There is a Direct Correlation between Paycheck Size and Skills & Experience
Some teens work while in high school. Some go on to college and work at another McDonald’s on campus. Or at some other entry-level job that requires no skills or experience. So they can learn workplace skills. Gain working experience. And learn the responsibilities that come with having a job. Others get bored or want more money. And use their newly acquired skills and experience to get another job. After graduating from high school. Perhaps entering an apprentice program in the skilled trades. Or becoming a line-cook somewhere. Gaining more experience. And earning more money. To become an electrician. Or go to culinary school and become a chef. Even open his or her own business.
These people are moving up. Which is why we call this upward mobility. They go from an entry-level job to one requiring more skills and experience that pays better. They may go to night school or college to gain skills that will help them get a job requiring greater skill and/or experience. Which pays even more. Allowing them to look to and plan for their future. Acquiring education, skills and experience along the way that opens the door to bigger paychecks. Which you need to raise a family. Have a nice house. A new car. Nice vacations. To save for your children’s college education. And your retirement.
You can’t have many of these things, though, if you never leave that entry-level job. If you stay in that entry-level job you’ll never be an engineer, a doctor, a pilot, a millwright, a pipefitter, an accountant, a hotelier, an architect, etc. And you’ll never get the larger paycheck that comes with these professions. For there is a direct correlation between paycheck size and skills & experience. The more you have the more you’re worth. It’s just that simple. Which is why it is a good thing that entry-level jobs pay the lowest wages. For it encourages upward mobility. Mastering the skills at one level. And then moving on to master new skills at a higher level. For we want people to move on so there are pharmacists to fill our prescriptions. Dentists to fix our cavities. Engineers to build and maintain our cellular networks. Aircraft mechanics to keep our planes safe. Etc. None of which we would have if no one left their entry-level job.
Staying in an Entry-Level Job for 5 Years could put you 5 Years behind your Earning Potential
The Democrats always want to raise the minimum wage. To get votes by giving people more stuff. In the case of a higher minimum wage it’s a bigger paycheck. They’ll cite the single mother of 3 struggling while working 2 jobs to support her children. And say it’s just not teenagers working these entry-level jobs. These are single mothers and single fathers who are barely making it. And we need to give them a living wage. But paying people more for these entry-level jobs is the worst thing you can do for them. For it removes the incentive to leave these jobs. Jobs that these employees don’t love to begin with.
President Obama wants to raise the minimum wage to $10.10 per hour. Others want to raise it higher. Some would even like to make it $40,000 or $50,000 a year. But imagine the affect of that on kids graduating high school who want a lot of things that Mom and Dad won’t buy for them. If you can have a lot of money now instead of working hard to earn that same amount of money later what do you think these kids and young adults will do? A lot of them will take that bigger paycheck now. And maybe work there 3-5 years enjoying life. Flipping those burgers. While some of their former classmates from high school will have started a career.
Raising the minimum wage only discourages upward mobility. Life is short. Time passes fast. Staying in an entry-level job for 5 years could put you 5 years behind your earning potential. It could change where you live. And what school your kids go to. Because that smaller paycheck will limit your options in life. A higher minimum wage may sound nice. But it would be the death knell of any hope or aspiration you ever had. People stay in jobs they hate because they don’t like leaving their comfort zone. If they have decent pay and benefits they will endure some of the worst jobs ever (bad boss, office politics, a coworker they can’t stand, dealing with unruly customers, etc.) because it is easier and less scary than finding a new job. These people are never happy. They never truly enjoy life. And they just dread Mondays. Raising the minimum wage will only condemn more people to this fate.
Tags: Democrats, earning potential, entry level job, entry-level, experience, hamburger-flipper jobs, inexperienced, McDonald's, minimum wage, paycheck, skills, teenager, unskilled, upward mobility
Colorado has allowed Recreational Use of Marijuana even though Federal Law prohibits its Sale and Use
Everyone on the left is saying it. Those in the mainstream media are saying it. Even some on the right are saying it. Obamacare is the law of the land. And it isn’t going away. As no law ever goes away. So get used to it. And quit your bitching, conservatives. Especially you radical Tea Party extremists. With all of your Constitutional this and Constitutional that. If you’re all about the rule of law then follow the rule of law. And quit trying to repeal Obamacare.
Marijuana is a class one narcotic. Federal law prohibits its sales and use. Yet those on the left have tried long and hard to decriminalize it. Comparing it to alcohol. Which is not a class one narcotic. For the left does not like the law criminalizing the sale and use of marijuana. And have bitched so much about it that at first states have allowed medical marijuana. And now Colorado has allowed recreational use of marijuana. Washington, too. Even though federal law prohibits the sale and use of this class one narcotic.
There are millions of illegal aliens in the United States. Who are in the country illegally. But those on the left want to change our laws so they aren’t here illegally. They want to grant them amnesty. Forgive their law-breaking. And give them citizenship. Because they are sure that if they do they will then thank those on the left (i.e., the Democrat Party) by voting Democrat. Especially when they’re telling them that the only reason why they are illegal is that Republicans hate Hispanics.
The Supreme Court made Law the People or Congress would not by Decriminalizing Abortion
The Second Amendment to the Constitution grants the people the right to keep and bear arms. The left doesn’t like guns. And they especially don’t like people owning guns. So the left hates the Second Amendment. Have long campaigned to curb gun ownership. And have used every opportunity to advance new gun control legislation. Whenever a mentally troubled individual goes on a shooting spree they blame the gun and not the mentally troubled individual. Adam Lanza, James Holmes, Jared Loughner and Seung-Hui Cho were all mentally troubled people. Yet the discussion is always about taking guns away from law-abiding gun owners. Not identifying these mentally troubled people before they hurt someone. Which they could still do even if you take other people’s guns away.
Abortion was illegal everywhere in the United States. The left did not like this. So they campaigned long and hard to decriminalize abortion. Which they could not do. At least, in Congress. Because the majority of the people opposed decriminalizing abortion. And they never had the votes in Congress to pass a law allowing abortion. Which is why there has never been an abortion debate in Congress. Not liking their odds in Congress they turned to the courts. On January 22, 1973, the Supreme Court made law the people or Congress would not. And decriminalized abortion.
The progressives in the early 20th century saw the people were just not smart enough to know what was best for them. And drinking was not. Husbands drank away their paychecks, came home drunk and beat their wives and gave them (and their unborn children) the syphilis they caught from prostitutes hanging out in saloons. So the progressives got a new amendment added to the Constitution to prohibit the sale and transportation of alcohol. The Eighteenth Amendment. A law the people didn’t like. And they repealed the Eighteenth Amendment with the Twenty-first Amendment. The only Constitutional amendment to be repealed.
The Left tries to Change or Go Around via the Courts Laws they Don’t Like
During the 1950s and 1960s Jim Crowe laws kept America segregated. Separate but equal went the mantra. The Southern Democrats made it difficult for blacks to vote. And treated them as second class citizens. Giving us race riots in the Sixties. And a civil rights movement. From the Montgomery Bus Boycott to Martin Luther King’s I have a Dream speech in Washington the movement grew in intensity. Leading to the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Overturning the Jim Crowe laws and desegregating America. Thanks to a united Republican Party that was able to overcome Democrat opposition in Congress to pass the bill.
The Southern Democrats did not lose the American Civil War well. They did not like the Fifteenth Amendment allowing their former slaves to vote. And they did not like the Thirteenth Amendment freeing their slaves. So the planter elite and their fellow Southern Democrats created the KKK. And began passing Jim Crowe laws to keep the defeated South racially segregated. The way it was written into the U.S. Constitution. The way it had to be written into the Constitution to get the Deep South to join the new United States of America. As the planter elite made clear. If there was no slavery there would be no United States.
We’ve had a lot of bad law in this country. Laws that we’ve repealed. Sometimes even over Democrat opposition. In fact the Southern Democrats pulled the southern states out of the union and into civil war with the northern states to defend the planter elite’s right to own slaves. Just as the planter elite forced those who wrote the Constitution to leave slavery alone if they expected their states to join the new union. And we’ve had laws the left just doesn’t like. Laws they’ve worked long and hard to change. Such as criminalizing gun ownership and decriminalizing marijuana. Or to get around them via the courts. Such as abortion. So the argument to just accept Obamacare because it’s the law of the land is a pretty weak argument. And chastising Republicans for not accepting laws they don’t like is hypocritical to say the least. We should be able to get rid of bad law. And Obamacare is a bad law. As it is doing the opposite of what it was supposed to do. So why not repeal it? I mean, if we were able to get rid of Jim Crowe Laws we should be able to get rid of another bad law like Obamacare.
Tags: abortion, civil rights, class one narcotic, Colorado, Congress, Constitutional, Democrat, Eighteenth Amendment, gun control, gun ownership, illegal aliens, Jim Crowe, Jim Crowe laws, law of the land, marijuana, Obamacare, planter elite, Progressives, repeal Obamacare, Republican, Second Amendment, slavery, Southern Democrats, Supreme Court
We have Complex Numbers because there is no such thing as a Square-Root of a Negative Number
If we graph AC voltage and AC current we would see two sine waves. Graphs that rise from zero, reach a peak, fall back through zero, reach a nadir and then rise back up to zero. Which repeats over and over. And when we have voltage and current we get power. If we pick a point in time on our AC voltage and current graphs we can multiply the value for the current by the value of the voltage to arrive at a value for power. If these two sine waves are on top of each other we will get the highest value for power. If one graph moves ahead or behind the other (so we can see two sine waves instead of one) we will have a value less than the highest power.
Picture two capital ‘S’s lying on their side. So they look like one period of a sine wave. And one is on top of the other so we only see one. If we draw a vertical line through the highest point on these ‘sine waves’ both ‘S’s will have the same highest value. Let’s call that value ‘3’. Giving us a power of 9 (3 X 3). Now let’s move one ‘sine wave’ to the right. And look at that same vertical line. With the one ‘sine wave’ moved they won’t have the same value at that point. One will be less than the other. Because the maximum value for that ‘sine wave’ occurs to the right of the maximum value of the other. Let’s say the value for the moved ‘sine wave’ at that point is now 2. Giving us a power of 6 (2 X 3).
When the power and current are 100% in phase we get our maximum power. When they move out of phase we get a value of power less than the maximum. Even though the voltage and current waves are unchanged. The degree they are out of phase is called the phase angle. And it’s a problem for power companies. Because the typical electric meter only measures part of the power a customer uses. The real or active power. Not the reactive power. And it’s a combination of the active and reactive power that gives us apparent power. What the power companies produce. In the ideal world (where the voltage and current sine waves are on top of each other perfectly in phase) reactive power is zero and apparent power equals active power. Mathematically we express this with complex numbers. Where there is a real part (the active part). And an imaginary part (the reactive part). Where i2 = -1. Something that can’t happen in the realm of real numbers. As there is no such thing as a square-root of a negative number. But it is this use of imaginary numbers that let’s engineers build the world around us.
Criminalizing Cigarette Smoking plus Decriminalizing Marijuana Smoking Equals more Democrat Votes
Complicated, yes? Few of us understand this. But that’s okay. We don’t have to. Engineers are very smart people that can do remarkable things mathematically to model and build our world. And when they do that world is a better place. Which is all most of us care about. So imaginary numbers may be a foreign concept to most. But they provide a very ordered and sensical world. Unlike other imaginary things. Like unicorns. Fairies. And imaginary logic.
Liberals are high practitioners of imaginary logic. On its face it seems like gibberish. Illogical. And nonsensical. But like complex numbers it’s the combination of these nonsensical parts that serve to advance an agenda. For example, in their ideal world everyone would abort an unplanned and/or unwanted child. While also saying that same-sex couples should be able to adopt and raise children. But how can a same-sex couple adopt a child if no unplanned or unwanted child is given up for adoption? Having both of these positions is like the square-root of a negative number. It’s just impossible. Unless you enter the world of imaginary logic. Where unfettered abortion plus same-sex adoption equals more Democrat votes.
Liberals have banned cigarette smoking wherever they could. First there were no smoking sections in restaurants. Then they banned smoking entirely from restaurants. Once upon a time people could smoke in the workplace. Then they forced them into smoking lounges. Then outside of the building. And finally a minimum distance away from the doorway. Because smoking will kill you. The people around you breathing in second-hand smoke. And the people breathing in the stink you leave behind after smoking (third-hand smoke). Smoke in the lungs is the number one killer in America. It is so horrible that no one should be able to smoke. No one should be able to advertise smoking. Even the cigarette packages shouldn’t be pretty as that may entice kids to start smoking. But liberals have no problem with people smoking unfiltered marijuana cigarettes. With marijuana they take the exact opposite position than they do with cigarettes. Go ahead and smoke. You aren’t hurting anyone. Having both of these positions is like the square-root of a negative number. It’s just impossible. Unless you enter the world of imaginary logic. Where criminalizing cigarette smoking plus decriminalizing marijuana smoking equals more Democrat votes.
Hollywood Liberals hate Cigarettes and Guns but love them in their Movies
Hollywood movie producer Harvey Weinstein recently said on the Howard Stern radio show that he hates the National Rifle Association (NRA). And is going to make a movie to destroy them. For he thinks guns in America are a horrible thing. He hates them. And hates people having them. But he loves them when they are in his movies. And has become quite wealthy glorifying horrific gun violence. If you are unfamiliar with some of the movies he produced you can look them up on IMDB. Here are just a few that are filled with over the top and very graphic gun violence (as well as sword violence, knife violence, blunt force violence, etc.). Django Unchained (2012). Grindhouse (2007). Kill Bill: Vol. 1 (2003). Gangs of New York (2002). Pulp Fiction (1994). True Romance (1993). To name a few. This is how the View content advisory under Violence and Gore begins for Django Unchained: “Note that most of the violence in this film are [sic] over the top and very graphic.”
Harvey Weinstein is a liberal Democrat. Who believes the only reason why people are using guns to shoot a lot of people is because those guns are for sale. Cigarette ads and pretty packaging will entice kids to start smoking. But showing wholesale violence like in his movies would never encourage a kid to pick up a gun? For that matter, the next time you see one of these movies note how many people smoke in them (or see Alcohol/Drugs/ Smoking under View content advisory on IMDB). Having Joe Camel on a cigarette package is going to get a kid to start smoking but seeing his or her favorite movie star smoking—and making smoking look so cool—isn’t? Of course it is. Far more than any cigarette ad is. Just as the vicious gun violence in these movies is desensitizing some kids to gun violence. And is the reason why young kids are having pretend gun fights at school. Not because they are card-carrying members of the NRA. But because they saw it in a movie.
Liberals believe cigarettes and guns are horrible things. And no one should touch them. But liberal movie producers fill their movies with cigarettes and guns. Because they are so cool and fun to watch. Having both of these positions is like the square-root of a negative number. It’s just impossible. Unless you enter the world of imaginary logic. Where criminalizing cigarette smoking and gun ownership plus glorifying cigarette smoking and vicious gun violence (and sex and drugs) in the movies equals more Democrat votes. Which is what imaginary logic is all about. Democrat votes. Which is why liberals can have conflicting positions on the same subject. Because they don’t really care about the subject. Or the people they harm. They just want the power that comes with getting people to vote Democrat.
Tags: abortion, active power, adoption, apparent power, cigarette, cigarette smoking, complex numbers, current, Democrat, Democrat votes, gun violence, guns, Harvey Weinstein, imaginary, imaginary logic, imaginary numbers, liberal, marijuana, NRA, phase, power, reactive power, sine wave, smoking, voltage
Having the Ability to give Beautiful Young Women Nice Things helped Charlie Harper get them in Bed
On the show Two and a Half Men there was an episode where Charlie (played by Charlie Sheen) was having a conversation with someone where he was trying to defend himself and the choice he makes in women. In broke off in mid sentence and said something like, “Yeah, you got me. Young and dumb. That’s how I like them.” Or something like that.
Charlie Harper was about 40 years old. Rich. He drank to excess. Smoked cigars. Gambled. Enjoyed strip bars and prostitutes. And he womanized. Getting beautiful young women back to his Malibu beach house for one night of passion. Which was all he wanted. One night. The ladies thought he wanted more. Because of the lies he told them to get them to his Malibu beach house. And when they left in the morning they expected Charlie to call them. But he never did. Which is why he liked his women dumb. For it was easier getting them into bed. And out of it.
Charlie was skilled in the art of picking up women. And what to do with them after picking them up. Skill gained over years of experience. And being rich helped, too. Because being able to give beautiful young women nice things (expensive dinners, going to the best clubs, spending the night at a Malibu beach house, gifts, etc.) got their attention. They liked that life. And wanted more of it. So they went to his bed with him. Thinking that by doing whatever he wanted there would be more of this glamorous life to come. But before that could happen Charlie was telling his lies to another young and dumb woman.
Every Communist Dictator that promised a Utopia to their People made their lives Absolutely Horrible
Charlie was engaged a few times. The last time he was engaged to Chelsea (played superbly by Jennifer Taylor). Who was a little older than most of the women he took to his bed. Smart. And wise. She had a career. Though he had a long engagement (for him) it did not last. Because she could do better. Eventually leaving him for someone more mature. In fact, every age-appropriate relationship he had failed. Because he did not do well unless they were young and dumb. As Chelsea said one time when leaving after a breakup, “We both knew you were going to blow it eventually.”
You can learn a lot by watching Two and a Half Men. For the world is full of Charlie Harpers. People that lie and manipulate people to get what they want. Who depend on people being young and dumb. This is how liberals have risen to power. By selling their utopian world view to the young and ignorant. Before they get old and wise. And learn the truth of their liberal utopia.
There was an article in Rolling Stone saying what America needs is full-blown communism. The author is a young guy. An academic type. Knows everything. But has experienced nothing. His head was filled with communist ideals from his leftist professors.
Imagine no possessions
I wonder if you can
No need for greed or hunger
A brotherhood of man
Imagine all the people
Sharing all the world…
But what John Lennon doesn’t sing about in Imagine is that every communist dictator that promised these things to the people made their people’s lives absolutely horrible. Where people lived in fear of the secret police. Were tortured at the hands of the secret police. And died at the hands of the secret police. Communism as an ideology has killed more people than any other dictator or ideology in all of history. Yet college kids everywhere still imagine a world where all the people live as one. Under the boot of an oppressive police state. That forces the people to live in a brotherhood of man. Or die.
Liberals are in a lot of ways like Charlie Harper because they like their Electorate Young and Dumb
Joseph Stalin terrorized his people with the KGB. The East Germans shot their own people who tried to escape climbing over the Berlin Wall. Cambodia’s Pol Pot killed a greater percentage of a nation’s population than any other dictator in history. Cubans risk their lives to float from Cuba to the United States. The masses in North Korea still suffer famine because of their oppressive Stalinist state. Where it’s the military first. Then the people. And so on. Yet college students still wear shirts with pictures of Che Guevara wearing his beret. This hero of ignorant college students. A guy who had urged the Soviets to launch their nuclear missiles at the United States during the Cuban Missile Crisis.
And when the secret police wasn’t killing their people the people were going without the most basic necessities. For their planned economies could not keep their store shelves stocked. So people went without many of the things people in Western capitalist economies take for granted. Things even ignorant college students take for granted. Things they just couldn’t get in their beloved communist utopias. Ronald Reagan won the Cold War not by waging nuclear war. He won it by creating an arms race that the Soviet economy could not keep up with AND feed her people. Like the Americans could. In fact, the American economic output was so great that they could feed all Americans with enough left over to export to the Soviet Union. So the Soviet people did not die from famine.
All throughout history free market capitalism provided a better life than any planned economy. Even in the United States. When FDR increased government spending to end a recession it only stretched out that recession into the Great Depression. Excessive government spending didn’t work in the 1970s for Nixon, Ford or Carter. Nor did it work during the Great Recession for Obama. But cuts in tax rates provided explosive economic growth for Warren Harding/Calvin Coolidge in the 1920s, JFK in the 1960s, Ronald Reagan in the 1980s and even George W. Bush in the 2000s. Yet the young and dumb buy the liberal lie that government spending can provide a better life for all despite history proving otherwise. And keep voting liberal. Until they get old and wise, that is. And start voting conservative.
Liberals are in a lot of ways like Charlie Harper. For they like their electorate young and dumb. So they can more easily lie to them. To get what they want. By making promises they never intend to keep. Such as that brotherhood of man sharing all of the world. For after a century or so of promising this the only people who ever enjoyed the liberal/communist utopia were those few in power.
Tags: brotherhood of man, capitalism, capitalist economies, Charlie Harper, Chelsea, college students, Communism, Communist, communist dictator, dictator, famine, ignorant, liberal, lies, old and wise, planned economies, Ronald Reagan, secret police, sharing all the world, Soviet, Stalin, utopia, vote conservative, vote liberal, young and dumb
It is very rare for People to Vacation somewhere where they have to wear more Clothes
People love a white Christmas. Looking out your front window as a gentle snow falls. Christmas lights and reindeer on the lawn poking out from the fields of snow. Coming in from the cold and shaking the snow off. Then warming up with a cup of cocoa in front of the fireplace. Feeling the warmth radiate out while listening to the pops of the burning wood. The warm memories of Christmases past. Then comes New Year’s Day. And then you just hate that foul white stuff as you shovel it for the umpteenth time.
As you shovel and your back aches and you feel what may have been a hernia you now understand why people retire to someplace warm. To get away from this. Before they have a heart attack shoveling it. Because you’re sick and tired of shoveling snow. Cleaning the snow off your car. Fearing for your life when cars ahead of you spinout. Wondering how many times can you slip and fall before you start breaking something. But most of all you just hate being cold. All you can think about is the joy of last summer sitting in the shade with a cold beer. Doing nothing. And loving it.
Even young and healthy college kids hate the cold. Which is why when they go on spring break they head south. And between the boozing and the sex they spend time lying on the beach doing nothing. And loving it. With the ladies practically naked in tiny bikinis sunning themselves. And the men looking at the practically naked ladies. For it is very rare for any vacationer (other than those on a ski getaway) to vacation somewhere where they have to wear more clothes. Because people just don’t like being cold.
The Fall Harvest feeds most People most of the Year
But we complain when it’s too hot, too. During the dog days of summer. When it’s the humidity, not the heat, that makes it so insufferable. Until we step inside our air conditioned home. Or sit in an air conditioned movie. While enjoying a cool beverage. And some delicious popcorn. Or spend time in the pool. Or at the beach. Where the ladies are practically naked. Or going out to eat. Enjoying cool adult beverages and a nice meal at an outdoor cafe while wearing shorts. Or dining inside an air conditioned restaurant.
You may sweat and stink when you get home. But you won’t be tracking snow and salt into the house. Soaking the rugs and carpets. Or leaving puddles of water on the tiled floor. No. During the summer there’s no mess. There are no wet socks in your shoes. No frost bite. No hypothermia. If you car breaks down in the summer you don’t have to worry about freezing to death before someone rescues you. Whereas if you slip off the road and down the embankment on an expressway during a blizzard frostbite and hypothermia are real possibilities. As is freezing to death. Because being cold is dangerous. And being cold when you’re stranded a long way from home or help can be lethal.
Another bad thing about cold is that things don’t grow in the cold. Which is why farming is seasonal. A problem throughout history. As people’s need to eat is not seasonal. So not only did farmers have to grow food to eat during the summer they had to grow enough during the summer to feed everyone throughout the winter. With the fall harvest feeding most people most of the year. Making a long growing season essential for survival. Because if you ran out of food before the next harvest you went hungry. Or died.
If we have another Little Ice Age we may suffer Recurring Famines once More
There were recurring famines during the Little Ice Age. Which ran from approximately 1350 to about 1850. The climate cooled enough to shorten the growing season. Which were cooler and wetter than they are today. And because of that they didn’t grow enough food to feed everyone. With the occasional famine wiping out about 10% or more of a country’s population. As masses of people starved to death because of global cooling during the Little Ice Age.
The United States suffered some droughts the past few growing seasons. And food prices went up because of these droughts. But there were no famines in the United States. Or in the countries the United States exports food to. No, today the only countries having recurring famines are hard-line communist or other such closed and oppressive states. Such as North Korea. Al Gore has been warning us about the perils of global warming since the Nineties. We did nothing. And a few decades later there are still no famines. Because even in regions suffering from the worst drought farmers can still irrigate their land. And grow food. Food may be more costly but there will be food. But no famine.
People who worry about global warming fret about these droughts. And the lack of fresh water. But about 70% of the earth is nothing but ocean. And we can desalinize seawater. It’ll make water more costly. But there will always be water. Even during the worst of droughts. So even if global warming does its worst to us we will be all right. No. The real fear is global cooling. Because global cooling will shorten our growing seasons. Which will reduce our food supply. And if you ever looked at an aerial view of our vast farmland you will understand the problem that is. It’s just too big to bring indoors. If we have another Little Ice Age we may suffer recurring famines once more. And not just in North Korea. But throughout the world. Those people vacationing in warmer climes know it. Global warming is better than global cooling. For our personal comfort and safety. And our food supply.
Tags: cold, drought, fall harvest, famine, farm, food, food supply, freezing to death, frost bite, global cooling, Global Warming, growing season, harvest, hate being cold, hate the cold, hypothermia, irrigate, little ice age, snow, summer, warm, warming, water, winter
The Generation that won World War II Sacrificed and Saved for the Future
The generation that lived through the Great Depression and World War II were a hardy people. They knew a thing or two about sacrifice. And going without. For their wants often went unfulfilled. And they were a skinny people. As there was not a lot of food to eat. First because of the Great Depression. When people could barely afford to stay alive. And then World War II. Where the government rationed almost everything for the war effort.
So they spent little. Saved what they could. Got used to not having what they wanted. And always worked hard for a better future. Sound familiar? No. Of course not. No one’s like this today. That hardy generation survived the Great Depression and won World War II. Making the world safe for democracy to flourish. Their free market capitalism made a prosperous world of plenty. So their children would never have to live in a world they had lived in. As it turned out, though, that was a mistake.
Their children were not like their parents. These baby boomers were not as hardy as their parents were. While they struggled and went without the baby boomers didn’t. The baby boomers became the Me Generation. Because it was all about them. They rejected the hard work and sacrifice of their parents. And didn’t save for a better tomorrow. No. For them it was all about the here and now.
The Me Generation rebelled against their Parents and became Anti-Parents
The Me Generation didn’t save like their parents. They spent. Changing the economy forever. From one made strong and healthy driven by private savings that banks converted into investment capital. To a Keynesian one. Where Keynesian economists viewed savings as economic leaks from the economy. No. Spending was better. Consumption was better than saving. Besides, what did we have to save for anymore with the Federal Reserve printing money? And the government paying our way for us in retirement?
The Me Generation was only too happy to help transform the government from one of savings and investment to one of consumptionand gratification. And they lived Life in the Fast Lane (by Joe Walsh, Glenn Frey and Don Henley, recorded by the Eagles in 1976 on the studio album Hotel California). “Everything all of the time.” And when that wasn’t enough there was cocaine to fill the remaining emptiness. “There were lines on the mirror, lines on her face.” Sometimes the drug use became so intense it interfered with another past time of the Me Generation. Sex. “He was too tired to make it, she was too tired to fight about it.”
So while their parents won the Second World War they were partying and getting high and having as much casual sex as their excessive drug use allowed. And because of it the Seventies gave us a new drug in the Eighties. Crack. And a war on drugs. As well as AIDS. Thank you, Me Generation. For rebelling against your parents and becoming anti-parents. Destroying our past culture and traditions. And our religion. Just so you can have “everything all of the time.” Right now. Without ever waiting to gratify an urge or desire.
Obamacare will Fail because the Young won’t give up their Life of Consumption and Gratification
The counterculture (i.e., the anti-parents) movement then entered academia. Took over the curriculum in our public schools. And our colleges and universities. Where they taught our kids that everything their parents told them was wrong. That they are destroying the environment. That American imperialism is the greatest threat to world peace. That the Founding Fathers were rich white slave owners who wrote the Constitution to further their greed. That free market capitalism is cruel, callous and unfair. While government is kind, feeling and fair.
The Me Generation learned something valuable as they entered academia. And government. That there are a lot of young people who vote. And because many of them grew up already rebelling against their parents they pushed these people closer to them. The anti-parents. Helping them to hold on to political power. So they appealed to all the things young people want. Such as sex. By providing free birth control and access to abortion. They attack Christianity and tell their students there is nothing wrong with their life of consumption and gratification. And, of course, they favor decriminalizing drugs. And are making great headway in that area with marijuana. I mean, kids just love the Democrats. For they indulge their every want and desire. Without parenting them to sacrifice and save for their future. Like their insufferable parents.
So our young have never been defined more by selfishness, narcissism and hedonism. Always living for the moment. Without a care in the world for the future. Making even the Me Generation seem selfless. Who lived in relative anonymity in their narcissistic world. Unlike today’s youth. Who can’t survive without Instagram, Twitter and Facebook. And must share every iota of their existence with the entire world. Because it’s all about them. The world revolves around them and the pursuit of their life of consumption and gratification. So it is rather ironic that the very thing that keeps Democrats in power—indulging in the youth voters’ selfishness, narcissism and hedonism—could deal such a threatening blow to their power. For Obamacare to work they need these young voters to be more like their parents and less like the people they are. Thanks to the Democrat indoctrination in our public schools, colleges and universities. To sacrifice some of their wants and desires to help their parent’s generation. To consume less. So the people they rebelled against can have free medical care.
This is why Obamacare (the Affordable Care Act) will fail. The young and healthy do not want to give up their life of consumption and gratification. Which means they’re not buying health insurance. Only the old and sick are. Because they need health care. While the young and healthy don’t. So they are not going to buy costly health insurance policies that they feel they will never use. Instead they’ll pay the lower-cost fine. So they can continue to live their life of consumption and gratification. That the Democrats told them all their life was what they should do. Not to save for the future. Or sacrifice. For their parents. Their community. Or their God. So the Affordable Care Act will fail. Because you can’t indulge selfishness, narcissism and hedonism and expect the young to give up their life of consumption and gratification.
Tags: academia, Affordable Care Act, anti-parents, baby boomers, capitalism, consumption, consumption and gratification, drug, everything all of the time, free-market capitalism, gratification, Great Depression, health insurance, hedonism, investment, Keynesian, Me Generation, narcissism, Obamacare, parents, sacrifice, savings, selfishness, World War II
Today Men smoke Marlboro Cigarettes to connect to that Rugged Cowboy on the Billboards
If you had parents or grandparents who lived through the Great Depression and World War II you’ve probably noticed something about them. They were a hardy breed. Especially the men. Sure, we all know someone who changed the oil in their own car. But back then it wasn’t uncommon to change the sparkplugs, shock absorbers, exhaust system, brakes, ball joints, etc. They even bought new tires and put them onto the rims themselves. As well as fixing everything that needed repair around the house. From the furnace to the toilet to the garbage disposal to installing a new roof on the house.
And all of this after they got home from work. Or on the weekend after cutting, edging, fertilizing and watering the grass. So the grass was lush and green for the kids to play on with Dad. When he wasn’t teaching them to ride a bike. How to protect themselves in a fight. Or helping them with their science project. Getting so involved that their kids turned in things they knew their teachers must have known they didn’t build themselves. But that’s how it was back then. There was nothing too complex or too difficult that Dad couldn’t roll up his sleeves and do. Sure, there may have been some cuss words. But that rugged can-do attitude forged in the fires of the Great Depression and World War II provided a feeling of safety and comfort in the home whenever Dad was there. As Dad was both provider and protector.
Today men smoke Marlboro cigarettes to connect to that rugged cowboy on the billboards. Back then they were that cowboy. Tough men who volunteered to fight in World War II. The last time that this type of American man was the rule and not the exception. But after the war the size of government grew. With the least manly men of all, liberals, leading the way. Bringing out the softer and more feminine side of men. Men who cry. And explore their feelings. Eating quiche instead of steak. Diluting the manliness in them. As any form of manliness became a socially undesirable trait.
The Left’s Objectification of Women cause Men to Linger in Adolescence instead of Growing Up and Maturing
It started with the Sexual Revolution. When we went from a family-centered society to one that viewed the idea of family itself as oppression. Women were encouraged to be sexual things instead of a wife and mother. Birth control and abortion made it possible to enjoy the sexual favors of a woman without being in a committed relationship. So men did. Using women to satisfy their lust. And only for that. Allowing women to go on to build a career. While men began to degenerate into a state of permanent adolescence. Being that young man who has but one thought on his mind all of the time.
Exit the cowboy. And enter the government. LBJ gave us the Great Society. And Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC). Giving rise to absentee fathers. And single mothers raising their children alone in government-built public housing. For the provider and protector left the household. As the government stepped in to take over that role. And did a horrible job. Destroying inner-city families. As crime-ridden public housing pushed these fatherless boys into gangs. And drugs. Which migrated to and infected their schools like a cancer. Boys who grew up seeing the new normal. Women are only for sexual pleasure. Not marrying and raising a family with. As their children followed the same path. Growing up without a father. With the state being provider and protector. Poorly, of course.
As men lingered in their adolescence they never fully grew up and matured. The very people who are responsible for this—the liberal left—blamed men for their brutishness. Saying it was the natural state of man. And soon made the very act of responding to the attractiveness of a woman as a form of sexual harassment. The government provides free birth control and access to abortion so women can be as sexually active as possible. The left attacks the censors and pushes the boundaries on television and in the movies. Today broadcast television shows often carry warnings like “Strong Coarse Language” and “Intensely Suggestive Dialogue.” Sexual imagery bombards us. For sex sells. It even sells sex on broadcast television. Such as the Victoria Secret Fashion Show. With beautiful models dressed only in underwear strut across the catwalk for one purpose. To bring attention to their sexual parts that their sexy underwear barely covers. So they can sell their lingerie to spice up sex in the bedroom. They do all of this and yet attack men as being primeval and brutish when they make inappropriate comments to women. Such as “You’re looking lovely today.”
The Archetypical Young Man Today is a bespectacled Man-Boy in a Plaid Pajama Onesie Sipping a Hot Chocolate
It’s a confusing world today. Women are encouraged to look as beautiful as ever while men aren’t supposed to notice. Liberals encourage them to explore their sexuality while they condemn men for wanting to enjoy that sexuality. Pulling them even further away from marriage and family as they turn to the world of online pornography. Further objectifying the already objectified woman. But in cyberspace men know their advances won’t be construed as sexual harassment. Social media even pulls the sexes further apart. Often the only time they get together is for sex. The Japanese young are even turning away from sex. As the cost of living in their nanny state is so great they don’t want to be burdened with the high cost of raising a family. Not surprisingly, life-like sex robots are a reality now in Japan. And elsewhere.
The left has been marginalizing the role of men in today’s society. They get women in as many male roles as possible. Even in the brutal sport of boxing. Which exemplifies man’s brutish nature. But celebrates the advancement of women in a male-dominated society. Even same-sex marriage further and subtly diminishes the role of man as the head of the household and provider and protector of the family. By equating the sexes. A man can have a husband or a wife. And a woman can have a wife or a husband. Advancing the idea of the obsolescence of man in traditional male roles. As President Obama’s Life of Julia showed how the government can be the provider and protector for women from 3 to 67. And the recent ad to get the young invincibles to sign up for Obamacare. Showing what the left considers to be the archetypical young man today. A bespectacled man-boy wearing a plaid pajama onesie while sipping a hot chocolate. A far cry from the rugged manliness of the Marlboro Man.
Is this the ideal man women want? Is this the man that can put a new tire on a rim? Is this the man that can win a world war? Is this man going to make anyone feel safe and protected? For when it comes to raising a family who do you want as father? Bespectacled pajama man-boy? Or the Marlboro Man? Paula Cole put this well in a song during the Nineties (see Where have all the cowboys gone).
Where is my John Wayne
Where is my prairie son
Where is my happy ending
Where have all the cowboys gone…
Where is my Marlboro man
Where is his shiny gun
Where is my lonely ranger
Where have all the cowboys gone
And we have a war on women? Seems more like a war on men if you ask me. And, sadly, it’s one men are losing. Sad for both men and women. And the nation. As real men are now the exception now and not the rule.
Tags: abortion, absentee fathers, birth control, cowboy, family, fatherless boys, Great Depression, liberals, manliness, Marlboro, Marlboro cigarettes, Marlboro Man, mother, Obamacare, obsolescence of man, pajama man-boy, protector, provider, provider and protector, public housing, sexual harassment, single mothers, war on men, war on women, wife, World War II
« Previous Entries Next Entries »