Week in Review
Some may think the Middle East is a homogenous region. Where all Muslim people are the same and think alike. But it’s not. And they’re not. There are huge divides between people in the Middle East. There isn’t just tension between the United States and this region. There’s tension between the different Muslim people. Something President Obama apparently didn’t know with his ‘let’s make nice to Muslims so our former enemies don’t hate us’ foreign policy. The geopolitical power struggles that exist everywhere else in the world exist, too, in the Middle East. And you just can’t treat everyone the same (see Obama Caught Between Polarized Allies in Egypt Crisis by Terry Atlas posted 4-19-2013 on Bloomberg).
U.S. regional allies such as Saudi Arabia and Turkey are backing opposite sides in the violent power struggle in Egypt, complicating U.S. diplomacy as the most populous Arab nation is torn by conflict.
In pressing Egypt’s interim government — and the military leaders who hold the real power — for political reconciliation with Islamist protesters, President Barack Obama is finding that U.S. influence is being challenged by financial and political support from Middle East countries pursuing their own stakes in Egypt’s future…
Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait have pledged billions of dollars in aid to the new Egyptian government. Qatar was a financial backer of ousted Islamist President Mohamed Mursi’s administration, and Turkey’s Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan denounced last week’s government crackdown on pro-Mursi protesters as a “massacre.”
“What Qatar and Turkey say is almost a 180-degree opposite of what the Emirates and the Saudis are saying publicly,” Katulis said.
There was a balance of power in the Middle East. And because there was a balance of power there was peace in the Middle East. And there was one man instrumental in keeping that peace. Hosni Mubarak. American friend and ally. And friend of our other friends and allies in the region. Those who want to maintain the balance of power. And the peace. And our friends were not happy when President Obama told Hosni Mubarak he had to go. Especially Saudi Arabia. Who is trying to check the spread of radical Islamism spreading in the region. Something Mubarak did. Because he and his allies and friends didn’t want radical Islamism spreading through the region. And neither does the United States.
Yet President Obama threw the one man that was instrumental in suppressing Islamist revolution in the region, by suppressing the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, under the bus. And did nothing as the Muslim Brotherhood rose to power. Even recognizing the anti-American Muslim Brotherhood as the legitimate ruler of Egypt. Despite warnings from every quarter. As the Muslim Brotherhood inspired/spawned Hamas, Hezbollah and al Qaeda. All anti-Western terrorist organizations. All anti-Israeli terrorist organizations. And all anti-American terrorist organizations. These are the people that President Obama said the U.S. can work with. Despite their credo being: “God is our objective, the Koran is our Constitution, the Prophet is our leader, struggle [jihad] is our way, and death for the sake of God is the highest of our aspirations.” These are the people that President Obama wanted to make nice to so they would stop hating us. Because he was naive and inexperienced. And tended to believe a little too much of the myth-making the American media was spreading about him.
The balance of power and the peace it brought is now gone. And the U.S. has allies falling on both sides of the Egyptian power struggle. What a mess. And it’s not isolated to Egypt. The Muslim Brotherhood is spreading its tentacles throughout the region. Making the Middle East a tinderbox. Where it’s probably going to get worse before it gets better. Sadly.
Tags: balance of power, Egypt, Egyptian power struggle, Emirates, Hosni Mubarak, Islamist, Middle East, Mubarak, Mursi, Muslim, Muslim Brotherhood, Peace, President Obama, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, terrorist organization, Turkey
Week in Review
Two years ago, during the Arab Spring, President Obama told President Hosni Mubarak he had to go. The Egyptian people wanted democracy. And Mubarak was in the way. So the Mubarak government fell. Even though he was an ally of the United States. Which was rather odd for an American president to ask an American ally to step down from power. Especially when the people standing in the wings to take over that power are enemies of the United States. But President Obama did. And he took credit for this. Proud for his part in the Arab Spring. And how did all of that work out? Like most people thought it would (see Tear gas fired by police in Egypt posted 1/26/2013 on Sky News).
Police in the Egyptian city of Alexandria have fired tear gas at protesters, witnesses say, as nationwide rallies mark the second anniversary of the uprising that ousted Hosni Mubarak…
Tens of thousands took to the streets across the country to protest against Islamist President Mohamed Morsi, who is accused of failing to work for the goals of the revolution that ousted Mubarak and consolidating power in the hands of his powerful Muslim Brotherhood.
That’s right, Egypt went from being a U.S. ally to aligning with Hamas and Iran. Enemies of the United States. And enemies of Israel. Greatly destabilizing the Mideast. For what? Even the Egyptian people are unhappy with the outcome. At least the ones who want Democracy. The Islamists, though, are quite happy with the Muslim Brotherhood in power. And hope to see them take Egypt down the same road Iran took in 1979. Where the Islamists rose up in power. Rounded up the democratic protestors. And turned the country into a theocracy. Something that may happen in Egypt. Thanks to an American president that told Hosni Mubarak he had to go.
Tags: Arab Spring, Egypt, Egyptian people, Hosni Mubarak, Iran, Islamists, Mubarak, Muslim Brotherhood
Week in Review
The Left unleashed a war against Republicans by claiming they were waging a war against women. They shouted from the rooftops the evil that would befall women should Republicans get elected. Scaring women with the specter of having to pay for their own birth control. And paying for their own abortions. Scaring a lot of women with the fear that should Republicans get elected they would force women into marriages against their will. Raising a family against their will. Cooking, cleaning and having sex with husbands against their will. So women voted for President Obama. To keep their birth control and their abortions. So they wouldn’t ever have to get married. So they could have happy fulfilling careers. Instead of a loving family. So they can die alone some day.
So this was the silly war the Republicans were waging against women. It’s a pity the Left doesn’t speak out against a real war on women (see ‘Men don’t have to worry about being caught’: Sex mobs target Egypt’s women by Charlene Gubash posted 12/4/2012 on Workd News).
In the post-Mubarak era, activists and protesters have reported many particularly violent assaults on women. Some experts allege the government and security officials are failing to take the problem seriously. More than 700 claims of harassment were filed across Egypt over the four-day Id al-Adha holiday in late October.
“It is not a country of law, not a state of law anymore. It has given men a chance to harass women without being accused,” said Afaf Marie, director of the Egyptian Association for Community Participation and Enhancement, an NGO.
Some activists fear that women’s rights will suffer under the rule of President Mohammed Morsi, who is an Islamist.
Government inaction has allowed the problem to spiral out of control, Heba Morayef, director of Human Rights Watch for the Middle East and North Africa, told NBC News. Police no longer inspire fear as they did before the revolution. In addition, locals say it appears there are fewer police on the increasingly lawless streets — and often none in Tahrir Square.
“The state is failing to respond,” she said. “Men don’t have to worry about being caught.”
Interestingly, President Obama helped bring President Mohammed Morsi to power. By telling President Hosni Mubarak that he had to step down from power. When there was no organized opposition save the Muslim Brotherhood. Who said they would not try to seize power. Who the American Left said they would not seize power. That it wouldn’t be another Iran. But in the resulting power vacuum left with the fall of Mubarak the Muslim Brotherhood stepped into that vacuum. And now their man, Mohammed Morsi, an Islamist, is now President of Egypt.
And any women who dare to leave their homes alone are being sexually assaulted. As the Muslim Brotherhood want women in Egypt to be like women in Iran. Oppressed and subservient. And everything the Left accused the Republicans of wanting to do with women they’re actually doing in Egypt. And worse. Including sexual harassment and rape in public. But where is the American Left? Keeping their eyes on those rascally Republicans. While their sisters suffer unspeakable cruelties in Egypt. Suffering in large part due to the actions of President Obama and his misguided Mideast policies. Who helped to make Egypt a less safe place for women. By telling Mubarak he had to go.
Tags: abortions, birth control, Egypt, Hosni Mubarak, Islamist, Mohammed Morsi, Morsi, Mubarak, Muslim Brotherhood, President Obama, Republicans, war against women, war on women
Week in Review
Hosni Mubarak kept the Muslim Brotherhood out of power when he ruled Egypt. Suppressing Iranian influence in Egypt. He even jailed Mohamed Morsi. A leading member of the Muslim Brotherhood. When the Arab Spring came along President Obama stated that long-time US ally Mubarak had to go. Even though the only organized opposition was the brotherhood. With their Iranian ties. And their ties to Hamas in the Gaza Strip. That terrorist group and branch of the Muslim Brotherhood that likes to fire missiles into Israel. Threatening regional stability.
So abandoning Mubarak was risky business. For the likely power to fill the resulting power void in Egypt would not be friendly to Israel, the US or regional stability. But the naysayers, and President Obama, brushed those concerns aside. For this wasn’t their fathers’ Muslim Brotherhood. This was a peace-loving brotherhood. Who wanted only democracy. Just like those Iranians who seized power in Iran after the 1979 Revolution. And installed a radical Islamic theocracy. But that wasn’t going to happen in Egypt. No, the Arab Spring was making the Middle East and North Africa safe for democracy. At least according to President Obama. Of course, those on the ground in Egypt would beg to differ (see Egypt’s President Morsi faces judicial revolt over decree by Tom Perry, Reuters, posted 11/24/2012 on The Vancouver Sun).
Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi faced a rebellion from judges who accused him on Saturday of expanding his powers at their expense, deepening a crisis that has triggered violence in the street and exposed the country’s deep divisions.
The Judges’ Club, a body representing judges across Egypt, called for a strike during a meeting interrupted with chants demanding the “downfall of the regime” – the rallying cry in the uprising that toppled Hosni Mubarak last year.
Morsi’s political opponents and supporters, representing the divide between newly empowered Islamists and their critics, called for rival demonstrations on Tuesday over a decree that has triggered concern in the West.
Issued late on Thursday, it marks an effort by Morsi to consolidate his influence after he successfully sidelined Mubarak-era generals in August. The decree defends from judicial review decisions taken by Morsi until a new parliament is elected in a vote expected early next year.
It also shields the Islamist-dominated assembly writing Egypt’s new constitution from a raft of legal challenges that have threatened the body with dissolution, and offers the same protection to the Islamist-controlled upper house of parliament.
Guess it’s their fathers’ Muslim Brotherhood after all. Boy, what a mistake it was throwing Hosni Mubarak under the bus. We should have worked with other Arab states friendly with Egypt who oppose the Iranian threat in the region to find a better solution than giving Egypt to Iran. For people may have complained about the restrictions of their freedoms under Mubarak but they haven’t seen anything yet. Just ask the Iranians who lived through the 1979 Revolution now living under a radical Islamic theocracy.
Tags: 1979 Revolution, Arab Spring, democracy, Egypt, Hosni Mubarak, Iran, Islamic theocracy, Islamist, Israel, Mohamed Morsi, Morsi, Mubarak, Muslim Brotherhood, radical Islamic theocracy, theocracy
Week in Review
George W. Bush was criticized severely for nation building and trying to spread democracy. Those who criticized Bush praise President Obama for bringing democracy to Egypt. Of course, it’s not quite the same democracy Bush was trying to spread in Iraq. He wanted a democracy that wouldn’t vote in a theocracy like they did in Iran. Some 30 years on Iran still does not have a democracy because of that oppressive theocracy they voted in. Now Egypt appears to be heading down the Iranian road (see Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood says new constitution must be based on Islamic Shariah law by Associated Press posted 10/31/2012 on The Washington Post).
Egypt’s powerful Muslim Brotherhood says Islamic Shariah law must be the basis of Egypt’s new constitution, and legislation must be based on Islamic penal code.
The Brotherhood said in a statement Wednesday that a country ruled by Shariah would not become a theocracy. President Mohammed Morsi comes from the Brotherhood.
This is not good for the US. It will be good for Iran. But is sure won’t be good for the US. Or Egyptian women. Just ask the Iranian women.
Given the choice between oppression under Hosni Mubarak or oppression under a theocracy I think most democracy-loving people would choose the Mubarak oppression. For few will argue that life for women in Mubarak Egypt was far better than it was/is in theocratic Iran.
Democracy fails when the wrong people rise to power and vote it away. Which is what happened in Iran. And looks like it may happen in Egypt. And with the al Qaeda-trouble in Benghazi it may be well underway there. Ultimately it may turn out that the Arab Spring was not good for democracy. It just threw out the dictators who oppressed those who wanted to make their countries even more oppressive. And the biggest losers in all of this? The women in the Middle East. Who yearn for the freedom and values they enjoy in the West. Like they enjoyed under the 8 years of George W. Bush, the 4 your years under George H.W. Bush and the 8 years under Ronald Reagan. Something these women would gladly trade for every chance they got.
You want to talk about a war on women? I give you the Arab Spring. And the march towards Iranian theocracy. Something the policies of the Obama administration have helped along with their foreign policy decisions in Egypt and Libya. And their snubs to Israel. The country with by far the greatest women’s rights in the Middle East. A country that already had a woman, Golda Meir, serve as the leader of their country. Perhaps if the women of the Middle East were demanding birth control and access to abortion (women’s rights American style) the Obama administration would not advance policy that is so detrimental to women there. Such as helping to make the way clear for a theocracy in Egypt. But as these women want things that are not vagina-centered (freedom of speech, escape from second-class status, the right not to be beaten or murdered for not behaving, to be able to go to school, get a job, etc.) this war on women is not heard here by the Obama administration. And these women will probably soon have the same fate the Iranian women had. Another country where a poor foreign policy decision (not to support the Green Revolution) has condemned women to further oppression there. While making the world a less safe place. As the Iranians are moving closer to having a nuclear weapon.
Tags: Arab Spring, democracy, Egypt, Egyptian women, George W. Bush, Hosni Mubarak, Iran, Iranian women, Israel, Libya, Middle East, Mubarak, Muslim Brotherhood, oppression, President Obama, Shariah law, theocracy, war on women
Week in Review
In 1979 Iranian college students, including women, overthrew the Shah of Iran. For these young women who were going to college, or recently graduated from college, thought the world looked bleak under the Shah of Iran. So they had a mini Arab Spring. To help sweep in democracy. To throw out the tyrant. So these women living in a fairly Westernized Islamic Arab country could more fully enjoy their lives. Well, they got their wish. They deposed the Shah. And within a year or so found themselves in an Islamist nation living under Sharia law. The Western freedoms they once enjoyed were gone. And here we are some 30 years later and Iran is still an Islamist nation living under Sharia law. Where women enjoy no Western freedoms like going to college. Or wearing blue jeans. No doubt those former college protesters regret their actions of some 30 years ago. Because truth be told things were not that bad under the Shah of Iran. Especially if you were a woman. For it sure was a lot better than what women enjoy today in Iran.
Fast forward to 2011 in Egypt and the exact same thing happened. College students, including women, in a fairly Westernized Islamic Arab country did exactly what the college kids did in Iran. Even President Obama asked our staunch friend and ally, Hosni Mubarak, to step down from power. For it was the Arab Spring. And democracy was flourishing. Abandoned and isolated and not wishing to turn his army on his people like Muammar Gaddafi did in Libya or Bashar al-Assad has and is doing in Syria, Mubarak stepped down peacefully. And now the Muslim Brotherhood is in power. And they’re talking about installing an Islamist government ruled under strict Sharia Law. Just like their friends did in Iran some 30 years earlier. No doubt these college protesters regret their recent actions. Because truth be told things were not that bad under Hosni Mubarak. Especially if you were a woman. For it sure was a lot better than what women enjoy today in Egypt.
So exactly how are things for women in Egypt these days? Not great (see Female reporter ‘savagely attacked and groped’ in Cairo during live broadcast for French TV news channel by Daily Mail Reporter posted 10/20/2012 on the Daily Mail).
A correspondent for France 24 TV was ‘savagely attacked’ near Cairo’s Tahrir Square after being seized by a crowd, the network said on Saturday.
The news channel said in a statement that Sonia Dridi was attacked around 10:30pm on Friday after a live broadcast on a protest at the square and was later rescued by a colleague and other witnesses.
It was the latest case of violence against women at the epicenter of Egypt’s restive protests…
Tahrir Square was the main hub of a popular uprising that toppled longtime Egyptian leader Hosni Mubarak last year. Since then, it has seen numerous other protests staged by a range of groups.
At the height of the uprising against Mubarak, Lara Logan, a correspondent for U.S. network CBS, was sexually assaulted and beaten in Tahrir Square.
She said later that she believed she was going to die. After being rescued, Logan returned to the United States and was treated in a hospital for four days.
The square has seen a rise in attacks against women since protesters returned this summer for new rallies, including incidents of attackers stripping women – both fellow demonstrators and journalists – of their clothes.
No official numbers exist for attacks on women in the square because police do not go near the area and women rarely file official reports on such incidents, but activists and protesters have reported an increase in assaults against women.
And although sexual harassment is not new to Egypt, suspicions abound that many of the recent attacks are organized by opponents of various protests in a bid to drive people away.
Amnesty International said in a report in June that such attacks appeared designed to intimidate women and prevent them from fully participating in public life.
Islamist nations that have or are trying to implement Sharia law don’t like women having any freedoms they enjoy in Western nations. This is no surprise. And was no secret. Abandoning Mubarak was a great foreign policy blunder. Leaving the Middle East a more dangerous place. Ditto for Libya. Muammar Gaddafi was no longer a great threat to US security interests. And was even suppressing radical Islamist elements within Libya. Supporting the al-Qaeda connected opposition in the Libyan civil war was another US foreign policy blunder. Leaving Libya a more dangerous place. Resulting in the death of the US ambassador and three other Americans. Who were left in a hostile and dangerous country without adequate protection we’ve recently learned. Who asked for more security forces but were denied. As it wouldn’t look good for a president running for reelection on a foreign policy success of killing Osama bin Laden and defeating al Qaeda.
Bad foreign policy. Driven by domestic politics. Not the reality of geopolitics. Four Americans are dead. And millions of women in the Middle East are condemned to a life of subservience and oppression. Where a 14 year old girl in Pakistan gets shot in the head because she wants to go to school and get an education. So she can be something other than subservient and oppressed. But the Taliban saw it differently. And shot her as a message to other women who dared to think they had a choice in their life.
Compare this life to the brutal war on women in the United States. As the great misogynist, Mitt Romney, shows his hatred and utter contempt for women by keeping resumes for women that were seeking a position is his administration when he was governor of Massachusetts in a binder. Shocking, yes? A binder! And you thought the Taliban/al Qaeda war on women was bad. Yes, they may beat, strip, rape, shoot and kill women. But they don’t organize resumes in a binder. Not like Republican Mitt Romney. Who they will attack as if he is evil incarnate. But they won’t say a word about the Islamist war on women. Or the bad American foreign policy that just condemned more of their Muslim sisters to further subservience and oppression.
Tags: Al Qaeda, Arab Spring, Bashar al-Assad, Cairo, democracy, Egypt, Hosni Mubarak, Iran, Islamist, Lara Logan, Libya, Logan, Middle East, Mitt Romney, Muammar Gaddafi, Mubarak, Shah of Iran, Sharia law, Syria, Tahrir Square, Taliban, war on women
Week in Review
Egypt is changing. And not the way the college students and protesters had hoped when they rose up against Hosni Mubarak. Much like similar protesters were to be disappointed during the Iranian Revolution (see Seeking support amid Islamist split, Egypt’s Brotherhood promises Muslim clerics say in power by the Associated Press posted 4/4/2012 on The Washington Post).
The Muslim Brotherhood’s candidate for Egypt’s presidency is lobbying hard for support of ultraconservative Muslim clerics, promising them a say over legislation in the future to ensure it is in line with Islamic law, as he tries to rally the divided Islamist vote behind him…
Giving Muslim clerics a direct say over legislation would be unprecedented in Egypt. Specifics of the Brotherhood promise, which Salafi clerics said Wednesday the candidate Khairat el-Shater gave them in a backroom meeting, were not known. But any clerical role would certainly raise a backlash from liberal and moderate Egyptians who already fear Islamists will sharply restrict civil rights as they gain political power after the fall last year of President Hosni Mubarak.
Unprecedented in Egypt, perhaps. But very much expected as it is exactly what happened following the Iranian Revolution. And not just a little like it but a lot like it. The Shah of Iran was a little too friendly to the West. So young college students and ‘reformers’ overthrew the ruthless dictator that was keeping them freer than they had the good sense to know. By preventing the rise of Islamic fundamentalism. The clerics kept promising that they didn’t want Sharia law. Until they didn’t have to promise it anymore. After they had subjected all Iranians to Sharia law. Those college students went on to miss that ruthless dictator. The Shah of Iran. And the freedoms they once enjoyed under him.
Salafis are the most hard-line of Egypt’s fundamentalists, depicting themselves as the “guardians of Shariah” and touting a strict interpretation of Islamic law similar to Saudi Arabia’s. Many of them see the Brotherhood as too willing to compromise on implementing Shariah and despise its political pragmatism.
Like Saudi Arabia? Yeah, we wish. Saudi Arabia is a friend and ally of the U.S. whose interests in the regions are peace and stability. Yes, let’s hope that if Egypt goes Islamic that it is another Sunni Saudi Arabia and not another Shiite Iran. Who has but one goal. The destruction of Israel, the United States and all other Western interests that don’t condemn Israel or the United States. The Iranians support terrorist organizations that disrupt peace and stability. The Saudis don’t. Yes, Osama bin Laden’s funding came from the Wahhabi in Saudi Arabia. But the Saudis didn’t sponsor them. They feared them. For the Wahhabi hate the House of Saud as much as they hate the Americans. Which makes them very much unlike Iran. And far more preferable than Iran. For any government that is hated by extreme Islamists has to be better than an extreme Islamists.
Mohammed Habib, who was the Brotherhood’s deputy leader at that time, says the platform item was for a body of clerics simply to advise lawmakers, but that some in the group wanted it to have a more powerful role to vet legislation…
Tharwat el-Kherbawi, a former Brotherhood member who fell out with the group, said the council appeared similar to Iran’s system of clerical “guardians” over the elected government.
Goodbye Egypt. And hello Iran.
Tags: clerics, college students, Egypt, Egyptian, Egyptian government, Hosni Mubarak, Iran, Iranian Revolution, Iranians, Islamic law, Islamist, Israel, Mubarak, Muslim Brotherhood, Muslim clerics, protesters, Salafi clerics, Saudi Arabia, Shah of Iran, Sharia law, United States, Wahhabi
Week in Review
So how is that Arab Spring going? Well, if it was a democracy movement, not too good. But if it was an Islamist movement, none too bad (see Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood backs military in dispute with US over pro-democracy groups by the Associated Press posted 2/15/2012 on The Washington Post).
Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood on Wednesday threw its weight behind the country’s military-backed government in an escalating dispute with the U.S. over the funding of pro-democracy groups.
Cairo claims that the groups are fomenting protests against the country’s military rulers, and has referred 16 Americans and 27 others to criminal court. Six Americans are barred from leaving the country.
Funny. The Muslim Brotherhood came to power in a pro-democracy movement. The so-called Arab Spring. Helped in part by President Obama. Who told Hosni Mubarak that he had to go. Is now trying to clamp down on pro-democracy groups. And is imprisoning Americans. Guess the meaning of democracy changes with time. And one person’s democracy is another’s enemy of the state.
The Brotherhood’s political party swept recent elections, taking nearly 50 percent of the seats in the new parliament. Liberal and secular activists who led last year’s popular uprising that toppled Mubarak failed to win significant strength in the parliament, and they are suspicious of the Brotherhood, suspecting that the veteran Islamist movement is working with the military to divvy up power while excluding the more secular forces.
Funnier still is that the people who overthrew the Mubarak government have no say in the new government. Who would have seen that coming? Other than those who know history? And warned that Egypt may very well go the way of the Iranian Revolution? Which it sort of looks like it is. Time will tell. Sadly for the people of Egypt. For democracy in the region. And especially for Israel. Who the Muslim Brotherhood really, really hates. And all of this going on while Iran is going nuclear.
Could be a sad time for the world.
Tags: Arab Spring, democracy movement, Egypt, Iran, Mubarak, Muslim Brotherhood, pro-democracy groups
Week in Review
Well the Egyptians have voted. And now begins the winter of their discontent (see Islamists secure top spot in new Egypt parliament by Marwa Awad and Lin Noueihed, Reuters, posted 1/21/2012 on Yahoo! News).
The Muslim Brotherhood won by far the biggest share of seats allocated to party lists in Egypt’s first freely-elected parliament in decades, final results confirmed, giving it a major role in drafting the country’s new constitution.
Banned under former leader Hosni Mubarak and his predecessors, the Brotherhood has emerged as the winner from his overthrow. Islamists of various stripes have taken about two thirds of seats in the assembly, broadly in line with their own forecasts.
The Brotherhood’s Freedom and Justice Party (FJP) has promised all Egyptians will have a voice in the new parliament, but Islamists are now set to wield major influence over a new constitution to be drafted by a 100-strong body parliament will help pick…
The Revolution Continues coalition, dominated by youth groups at the forefront of the protests that toppled Mubarak, attracted less than a million votes and took just seven of the 498 seats up for grabs in the lower house…
Only one woman was among the appointees which is likely to further disappoint feminist groups after women won only a handful of seats in the elections. Mubarak had traditionally used the quota to boost the representation of women and Coptic Christians.
So, only 7 of the youth who overthrew Mubarak in hopes of a better future will have a say in the new government. And only one of them is a woman. Kind of like the Iranian Revolution. When all those college students, men and women, overthrew the Shah. And how did that turn out for them? If you were a woman not good. They lost their freedom. That same freedom they once enjoyed while protesting the Shah of Iran. Much like the women who brought down Hosni Mubarak will no doubt lose as well. Based on the strong Islamist wins.
Who would have thought that all those who protested Mubarak and wanted a brighter future would have voted that very future away from themselves? For with the Islamists writing the constitution you can bet that the new government will be very Islamist. And much like Iran. Which no protester said at the time they wanted. In fact, the Muslim Brotherhood went out of their way saying that Egypt would not be like Iran. Despite their own personal desire for it to be like Iran.
Funny how history repeats.
Tags: Constitution, Egypt, Egyptians, freedom, Iran, Iranian Revolution, Islamists, Mubarak, Muslim Brotherhood, Shah