Cyprus and the Eurozone Crisis shows why we’d be better off with a Gold Standard

Posted by PITHOCRATES - March 30th, 2013

Week in Review

Debtors love inflation.  They love to borrow cheap dollars.  And love even more to repay their loans with even cheaper dollars.  Creditors, on the other hand, hate inflation.  Because they are on the other side of that borrowing equation from the debtor.  And when a debtor repays a loan with depreciated dollars the creditor who loaned that money loses purchasing power.  Causing the creditor to lose money.  Just because they had the kindness to loan money to someone who needed it.  Which is a strong disincentive for making future loans.

This has long been at the heart of all banking wars.  And banking crises.  The fight between paper money and hard money.  Printed dollars versus specie (gold and silver).  People who want to borrow money love paper.  Because banks could make a lot of it to lend.  Something they can’t do with gold and silver.  Because it takes a lot more effort and costs to bring new gold into the economy.  Those who want to borrow money argue that hard money hinders economic activity.  Because there is a shortage of money.  And because governments are always interested in boosting economic activity they are always in favor of expanding the paper money supply.  This generous expansion of credit is currently miring the Eurozone in a sovereign debt crisis.  And launched a confiscation of wealth in Cyprus.  Greatly threatening the banking system there.  As few depositors trust their money will be safe in their bank.  Causing people to return to specie (see Cypriot bank crisis boosts demand for gold by Ian Cowie posted 3/27/2013 on The Telegraph).

The Cypriot banking crisis reminds even the most trusting savers that not all banks or jurisdictions are safe – and is boosting demand for gold, bullion dealers claim.

As if to prove the old adage that it’s an ill wind that blows no good, enthusiasts for the precious metal argue that financial shocks in the eurozone are reminding savers of gold’s attractions…

[Daniel Marburger, a director of Jewellers Trade Services Partners (JTS)] said: “The situation in Cyprus has reignited the wider Eurozone sovereign-debt crisis. At a time like this, people are attracted to gold because it is the ultimate crisis commodity.

“The proposed levy on deposits of Cyprus’s savers has not only shaken confidence in the single-currency Eurozone, it illustrates the fragility of savings held within the banking system. In our experience, clients are attracted to gold because it offers insurance against extreme movements in the value of other assets. Unlike paper currency, it will never lose its intrinsic value…”

“The events in Cyprus prove once again that bank customers do face risks as creditors who are owed money…”

When you deposit your money into a bank you become a creditor.  You are loaning your money to the bank.  Who pays you interest to loan your money to others.  If the inflation rate is greater than the interest you earn your money actually shrinks in value.  And the more they print money the more it shrinks in value.  That’s why as a creditor you won’t like the harmful effects of inflation.  Even if it makes the people happy who borrow your money from the bank.  Because they get a real cheap loan at your expense.

Which is why people are drawn to gold.  Because they can’t print gold.  So it holds value better than paper.  And the government can’t just confiscate a percentage of your savings if it isn’t in the bank.  Another reason why people are drawn to gold.  If the banking system collapses, or if the government seizes people’s retirement savings to ward off a banking system collapse, people can take their gold and move somewhere else that isn’t having a financial meltdown.  And not lose any of their wealth.

Which is, of course, the last thing you want to happen in a country.  For a sound banking system is essential for a prospering middle class (if it weren’t for banks only rich people would own homes, cars, go to college, etc.).  Which is why a responsible monetary policy, and responsible people in government, is a prerequisite for a sound banking system.  Which few nations in the Eurozone have.  As few nations throughout the world have.  For they all want to buy votes by giving away free stuff.  And having the power to print money allows them to give away a lot of free stuff.  Pensions.  Health care.  College educations.  Lots and lots of government jobs.  Etc.  But there comes a point when you give away too much.  And you have sovereign debt crises.  As well as confiscations of wealth.

This was the advantage of a gold standard.  Like when we coupled the value of our world’s currencies to the price of gold.  It did not allow any nation to inflate their currency.  For if they did people would exchange that devalued currency for the fully-valued gold.  A strong incentive not to devalue your currency.  Which was nothing more than a promise to pay in gold.  The gold standard kept governments responsible.  But because it made it so difficult to buy votes everyone cheered when President Nixon decoupled the dollar from gold.  Putting an end to the last vestiges of a gold standard.  Allowing governments everywhere to be irresponsible.  Bringing on financial crises.  And the confiscation of wealth.  As we see happening in Cyprus.  And will no doubt see elsewhere.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Cyprus Bailout includes the Confiscation of People’s Personal Savings

Posted by PITHOCRATES - March 17th, 2013

Week in Review

President Obama isn’t worried about the deficit.  Or the debt.  Neither are Democrats.  Who see no problem with increasing federal spending even more.  Probably because there are Nobel Prize winning economists like Paul Krugman saying deficit spending is a good thing. Because what can possible go wrong with spending money you don’t have?  No doubt the very same things they were saying in Greece.  Italy.  And Cyprus (see Analysis: Cyprus bank levy risks dangerous euro zone precedent by Mike Peacock posted 3/17/2013 on Reuters).

A hit imposed on Cypriot bank depositors by the euro zone has shocked and alarmed politicians and bankers who fear the currency bloc has set a precedent that will unnerve investors and citizens alike.

After all-night Friday talks, euro finance ministers agreed a 10 billion euro ($13 billion) bailout for the stricken Mediterranean island and said since so much of its debt was rooted in its banks, that sector would have to bear a large part of the burden.

In a radical departure from previous aid packages – and one that gave rise to incredulity and anger across Cyprus – the ministers are forcing the nation’s savers to pay up to 10 percent of their deposits to raise almost 6 billion euros…

The decision sent Cypriots scurrying to the cash points, most of which were emptied within hours. Most have been unable to access their bank accounts since Saturday morning, a move unlikely to engender calm…

A Cypriot bank holiday on Monday will limit any immediate reaction. The deposit levy – set at 9.9 percent on bank deposits exceeding 100,000 euros and 6.7 percent on anything below that – will be imposed on Tuesday, if voted through in parliament…

“I understand that electorates in Germany and northern Europe demand some sacrifice. However, when you accept a solution that basically expropriates 10 percent of deposits, you set a dangerous precedent,” Vladimir Dlouhy, former Czech economy minister and now international advisor for Goldman Sachs told Reuters in Berlin. “If we get into deeper trouble, God help us, they may try to take 50 percent.”

Ouch.  That’s what can go wrong with too much government spending.  And too much debt.  The government will just seize your money.  Scary.  Hearing stuff like this makes you pay a little more attention to that idea someone floated about the government expropriating 401(k) retirement accounts.  Taking our retirement money.  But being magnanimous enough about it to give us something valuable in return.  A promise to pay us a fixed retirement benefit.  Something as reliable and solvent as Social Security.  Preferably like it used to be.  Before they began forecasting it was going bankrupt.

So this is the downside to spending money you don’t have.  Bank runs.  As people pull their money out of our banks before the government can seize it.  Causing banks to fail.  Crashing the economy into a depression.  Just like all those bank failures in the Thirties caused the Great Depression.  But other than this there is little to worry about spending money you don’t have.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

The City of Detroit can’t maintain her Parks but the Private Sector Can

Posted by PITHOCRATES - February 10th, 2013

Week in Review

Detroit, the Motor City, the automotive capital of the world (at one time), is an example of what government should NOT do.  The city got rich off of the automotive industry.  They imposed a city income tax.  Greatly expanded the size of city government.  With the public sector unions negotiating generous pay and benefit packages.  Just as the UAW was giving their members generous pay and benefit packages.  And why not?  Detroit WAS the Motor City.  And nothing was going to stop that cash cow.  What could possibly go wrong?

As it turned out, a lot.  Competition came in and offered quality cars for less.  And the great decline of the Big Three began.  As did all that tax revenue to fund that expanded government with those generous pay and benefit packages.  Fast forward to today and Detroit is a shell of what it once was.  Half of its population is gone.  Drowning under the cost of that expansive city government.  And forced to close city parks because there’s just no money left after paying for those generous pay and benefit packages (see Detroit to Lose 51 Parks – Impact on Residents by Marilisa Sachteleben by Marilisa Sachteleben posted 2/4/2013 on Yahoo! News).

Detroit’s City Council nixed a plan to lease Belle Isle to the State of Michigan last week. In response, Mayor Dave Bing announced plans to close 51 area parks, cut maintenance at others, and greatly reduce recreation center budgets overall, says the Detroit Free Press…

The Detroit Free Press reports that revenue lost from the collapsed Belle Isle deal means that groundskeeping on Belle Isle will be limited. The Belle Isle Conservancy was able to get the island’s historical aquarium reopened in 2012 after being shut down for several years. With less money, it may be difficult for Belle Isle attractions to remain open…

Detroit resident Syed Mohiuddin of the Michigan Muslim Community Council is very concerned about park closures. He said, “My wife and I live downtown, and we are definitely affected by the announcement. Park closures are not an option. To the contrary, we need to invest more in parks to make our neighborhoods safer and community healthy. How do we do that given the state of our budget? Partnerships. Corporations, suburban religious groups, and others can and should partner with city government and community organizations and find solutions for each and every park. They are just too important to sacrifice, not in the name of politics, not in the name of budgets.”

He’s right, you know.

One local park group came up with such a solution: the Clark Park Coalition. Clark Park, at 1130 Clark St. in Detroit’s Southwest-Mexicantown neighborhood, was forced to close over 20 years ago due to financial troubles in Detroit. Concerned neighbors, activists, organizations, and youth programs put their heads together to preserve Clark Park. They formed a nonprofit partnership with the city recreation department.

Currently, Clark Park’s collective provides year-round programs to over 1,200 youths in the area. It maintains a regulation-size outdoor ice hockey rink (the only one in Metro Detroit). Free daily summer lunches are served to over 100 youth. Activities at Clark Park include baseball, arts and crafts, field trips, soccer, golf, fitness training, softball, tennis, roller hockey, gardening, and ice skating. Kids can come to the park center for homework help, mentoring, and computer assistance. There are community service activities for school projects and even opportunities for kids to find jobs.

Imagine that.  The City of Detroit is going bankrupt.  They can’t afford basic maintenance at their parks.  And look at all the private sector did at Clark Park.  This just goes to show you what the private sector can do.  And what the public sector can’t do.  The lesson?  Cities should privatize as much as they can.  And embrace partnerships.  Corporations.  Suburban religious groups.  And community organizations.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Abortion and Birth Control are Bankrupting Social Security and Medicare

Posted by PITHOCRATES - January 20th, 2013

Week in Review

For the first time in history a credit reporting agency (Standard and Poor’s) downgraded the U.S bond rating in 2011.  Why?  The agency said they needed to see $4 trillion in spending cuts over 10 years.  The best Congress could do was $917 billion in spending cuts over 10 years.  And the creation of a super-committee to find another $1.5 trillion.  For a total of $2.417 trillion in spending cuts.  At least, on paper.  That never happened.  After winning reelection the president held out for and got increases in tax rates.  So he could increase spending.

So how did the U.S. get to where they needed to cut $4 trillion in spending?  Well, a large part of it has to do with abortion (see 55,772,015 Abortions in America Since Roe vs. Wade in 1973 by Steven Ertelt posted 1/18/2013 on LifeNews.com).

The United States marks 40 years of legalized abortion in all fifty states at any time for any reason throughout pregnancy on January 22nd, the anniversary of the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision. Since that time, there have been approximately 55,772,015 abortions that have destroyed the lives of unborn children.

Taxpayers pay taxes.  And how do we get taxpayers?  By having babies.  So when we aborted over 55 million babies the effect on tax revenue was profound.  We can see how by making some assumptions.  And doing a little math.

First of all, 55,772,015 abortions over 39 years come to on average 1,430,052 abortions a year.  Dividing this number by two to pair off couples for baby-making that comes to 715,026 couples.  Without abortion available we’ll assume about 80% of these couples will have children.

The first babies of the 715,026 enter the workforce 20 years later.  So in that year the number of additional workers paying taxes equals 2,002,072 (1,430,052 + (0.8 X 715,026)).  The following year the second child of this couple enters the workforce while another couple’s first child enters the workforce.  This brings the additional workers paying taxes equal 3,146,114.  And so on until each couple brings in three new taxpayers into the workforce. Over a decade the number of new workers paying taxes equals 110,685,999.

Assuming a median income of $50,000 these 110,685,999 taxpayers earn a total of $5.5 trillion over ten years.  Assuming an effective federal income tax rate of 18% the total federal income tax these people would have paid equals approximately $996 billion.

Using the 12.4% Social Security tax rate (both employer and employee) the amount of Social Security taxes these people would have provided over 10 years equals approximately $686 billion.

Using the 2.9% Medicare tax rate the amount of Medicare taxes these people would have provided over 10 years equals approximately $160 billion.

Adding these taxes together (Social Security and Medicare) they add up to $847 billion.  Adding this to the amount of federal income taxes brings the amount of taxes these people would have provided over ten years to about $1.8 trillion.

When they wrote Social Security and Medicare into law the average family size had fallen from around 5 to about 3.5 over a decade or so.  If you take that $1.8 trillion and adjust it for 3.5 children (1.8/3 X 3.5) the lost tax revenue equals $2.15 trillion.  At 4 children that lost tax revenue comes to $2.5 trillion.  At 5 children that lost tax revenue comes to $3.1 trillion.  At 6 children it’s $3.7 trillion.

Today’s seniors entered child-bearing age long before women’s liberation, birth control and abortion.  So most women got married and had children.  It is not uncommon for today’s seniors to come from families of 10 children or more.  This is significant because when the actuaries set up Social Security and Medicare they assumed these trends would continue.  But they didn’t.  The birth rate (and the population growth rate) declined since Social Security and Medicare became law.  Causing the population to age.  More people are now leaving the workforce and collecting Social Security and Medicare benefits than there are workers entering the workforce to pay for them.

Abortion has been a part of this decline.  In a current 10-year projection we are seeing anywhere from $1.8 trillion to $3.7 trillion in lost tax revenue due to abortion.  If Roe v. Wade didn’t legalize abortion and the Left didn’t assault the family (encouraging women NOT to get married or have children) during the Seventies as radical feminism took off there would have been a lot more births.  Perhaps as many as those actuaries thought there would be when they calculated the costs of Social Security and Medicare.

If normal family patterns had continued not only would these abortions not have happened families may have had more children.  Producing more taxpayers.  There were 3,136,965 live births in 1973.  The average family size then was about 2.5.  If you divide the number of births by average family size you get about 1,254,786 families having children.  If each of these families had one additional child that additional 1,254,786 children would be approximately 87.7% of the average number of abortions.  If these children grew up to have three children of their own we can calculate this additional tax revenue the same way we did for the loss revenue from abortion.  Or we can multiply the loss revenue from abortion ($1.8 trillion) by 87.7% to approximate what those additional children in 1973 would contribute in a ten-year projection today.  Approximately $1.9 trillion.  Adding the losses from abortion and families having one less child brings the total of loss tax revenue to $4.04 trillion.  Which equals the $4 trillion S&P was looking for in spending cuts.

So what is the cause for America’s deficits?   Is it because the rich aren’t paying their fair share in taxes?  No.  It’s because of abortion and birth control.  And radical feminism.  That attacked the family and encouraged women to do anything but get married and have children.  Something FDR and his New Dealers never designed Social Security and Medicare to take into account.  For FDR and his New Dealers were sexists.  As are Social Security and Medicare.  These programs require women to marry and have children to stay solvent.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Keynesian Fiat Economies are so Bad that the World is Turning back to Gold

Posted by PITHOCRATES - January 19th, 2013

Week in Review

Keynesians hate the gold standard.  They blamed it for the Great Depression.  Which they believed could have been avoided if the government printed more money instead of contracting the money supply.  For a Keynesian’s answer to everything is to expand the money supply.  So the government can spend more money.  This came to a head in the U.S. during the Seventies.  Foreign countries were converting their dollars into gold.  Because the U.S. was devaluating the dollar by printing so much new money.  So these countries took the gold instead.  Because you can’t depreciate gold.

The Seventies were a disaster.  It turned out that the government just couldn’t print money to pay its bills as the destruction they caused on the dollar devastated the economy.  So they backed off.  The Federal Reserve raised interest rates into the double digits to stamp out that destructive inflation.  The world didn’t return to a gold standard, though.  As most countries were still hard-core Keynesians who liked the ability to make money out of nothing so they can keep spending. But now the Eurozone is in a sovereign debt crisis.  The UK is slashing their NHS budget.  Japan is now spending twice their GDP and stuck in an economic slump going on for over two decades.  And as the U.S. is spending about 100% of its GDP they added a whopper of a new entitlement.  Obamacare.  The destruction of the dollar isn’t a question of if but when.  And now we’re seeing a quasi return to the gold standard as nations everywhere are losing faith in the ability of these Keynesian governments to spend responsibly (see A new Gold Standard is being born by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard posted 1/17/2013 on The Telegraph).

The world is moving step by step towards a de facto Gold Standard, without any meetings of G20 leaders to announce the idea or bless the project.

Some readers will already have seen the GFMS Gold Survey for 2012 which reported that central banks around the world bought more bullion last year in terms of tonnage than at any time in almost half a century.

They added a net 536 tonnes in 2012 as they diversified fresh reserves away from the four fiat suspects: dollar, euro, sterling, and yen…

Neither the euro nor the dollar can inspire full confidence, although for different reasons. EMU is a dysfunctional construct, covering two incompatible economies, prone to lurching from crisis to crisis, without a unified treasury to back it up. The dollar stands on a pyramid of debt. We all know that this debt will be inflated away over time – for better or worse. The only real disagreement is over the speed.

This is the inevitable result of Keynesian economics.  Reckless spending that destroys currencies.  And right now these countries stand in judgment of the U.S., the Eurozone, Great Britain and Japan.  Their social spending obligations have put them on a path towards currency destruction.  And they don’t want be around when that happens while holding dollars, euros, sterling, or yen.  Because they just won’t be worth the paper they’re printed on.

In Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged American Industrialists went on strike.  Walked away from their companies and disappeared.  Leaving their overregulated and overtaxed businesses to the government to do with them as they pleased.  Refusing to be economic slaves anymore.  They eventually migrated to a place called Galt’s Gulch somewhere in Colorado.  Where they made their own community.  And economy.  Where creators traded with other creators.  Using that one money that stood the test of time.  Gold.  For if you wanted to buy something in Galt’s Gulch you had to have gold.  For no one accepted cash there.  Some have been predicting we’ve been on the brink of something like this actually happening for the last 80 years or so.  And now it’s happening.  Only it’s not American industrialists turning on the U.S. government but the rest of the world.

Is it any wonder that sales of Atlas Shrugged have surged during the Obama administration?  These people are seeing what these countries see.  The decline of the U.S.  And the destruction of the dollar.  Thank you President Obama.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Aging Populations cause Falling Revenue and Greater Spending Obligations in Japan and the United States

Posted by PITHOCRATES - January 5th, 2013

Week in Review

President Obama added $5.3 trillion in new debt in his first term.  Approximately the sum total of all debt added from George Washington to George H.W. Bush (in real dollars).  It took about 200 years to accumulate that massive amount of debt.  It only took President Obama 4 years.  Yet according to the Left we have a revenue problem.  Not a spending problem.  But when you add about 200 years of debt into only 4 years you have a spending problem.

In the recent fiscal cliff theatre the Democrats got a bipartisan compromise.  They got the higher tax rates they wanted.  And the Republicans gave them those higher tax rates.  The very meaning of bipartisan to the Democrats.  Unconditional surrender so they can get their way.  And now the total debt is around 103% of GDP.  Which means we owe as much as the nation produces in economic activity.  Meaning that we ain’t paying it down anytime soon.  And with our aging population things are only getting worse.  More workers are leaving the workforce consuming retirement and health care benefits than are entering the workforce to pay for them.  Which means the problem is only going to get a lot worse.

Eternal Keynesian optimists on the Left, though, like to point to Japan.  Whose total debt is about 230% of their GDP.  They say if Japan can get along with a debt of 230% of GDP then we have nothing to worry about.  Well, the Japanese are starting to worry (see Japan’s population logs record drop by AFP/fa posted 1/1/2013 on Channel News Asia).

Japan’s population logged a record drop in 2012, health ministry estimates showed on Tuesday, highlighting concerns that an ever-dwindling pool of workers is having to pay for a growing number of pensioners…

Japan is rapidly greying, with more than 20 percent of the population aged 65 or over — one of the highest proportions of elderly people in the world.

The country has very little immigration and any suggestion of opening its borders to young workers who could help plug the population gap provokes strong reactions among the public.

Japan has a lot to worry about.  And the last thing we want is to have their problem.  The Left understands this.  Which is one of the reasons they want to grant immunity to all those in the country illegally.  So they can tax them.  But when you’re buying votes by giving away free stuff you’re still going to have a spending problem no matter how much you increase revenue.  Especially when your spending has pushed the national debt past 100% of GDP.

As the population continues to age revenues will shrink.  This is the reality we have here (as well as what the Japanese are facing).  Adding a new entitlement, Obamacare, was the height of fiscal irresponsibility.  It will quickly push our debt up to Japanese levels.  Who will have a very painful day of reckoning in the not so distant future.  Higher spending obligations and falling revenues can only lead to one place.  And it isn’t a good place.  Just ask the Greeks.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Detroit’s Public Sector Unions may push the City into the Biggest Municipal Bankruptcy in U.S. History

Posted by PITHOCRATES - December 16th, 2012

Week in Review

Michigan just became a Right to Work state in an effort to lure business into Michigan.  Whose high union costs have chased business away from Michigan.  Detroit, The Motor City, auto capital of the world, home of the Big Three, is a dying city.  While Mercedes, BMW, Toyota, Honda, etc, have built new auto plants in the United States not a one of them built in Michigan.  Because of their high union costs.  So Detroit has the Big Three.  But no one else.  And even two of the Big Three recently filed bankruptcy thanks to those union legacy costs (pensions and health care for retirees who outnumbered the active workforce).

So Michigan is bad.  But Detroit is worse.  They’ve lost so much industry that the number one and two employers in the city are the City of Detroit and the Detroit Public Schools.  Both who have unions doing to the City of Detroit what the unions did to the Big Three (see Detroit has “serious financial problem”: Michigan treasurer by Ann Saphir posted 12/15/2012 on Reuters).

A check of Detroit’s finances has found a “serious financial problem” with the cash-strapped city, a step that could lead to the biggest municipal bankruptcy in U.S. history…

That official would have the power to put the city of 700,000 into Chapter 9 bankruptcy if other rescue plans are not feasible or effective.

Detroit, home of General Motors Co., has been hit by a steep population decline, years of severe budget deficits and escalating employee costs, all of which led state officials to begin an intervention process last year.

Detroit’s population peaked at 1,850,000 in 1950.  The city has since lost over half of its population.  First the jobs left.  Then the people.  During this time the size of city government grew.  As did the public sector union pay and benefit packages for those public sector workers.  The city’s costs soared as their tax base disappeared.  So it’s no surprise that the city is facing perhaps the biggest municipal bankruptcy in U.S. history.

At this point in time it’s probably not a question if Detroit will file bankruptcy.  But a question of when.  They’re going to have to do what the Left wants to do for people underwater in their mortgages.  And for students buried in student loan debt with no job prospects (because they got degrees in Philosophy, Religious Studies, Anthropology, Archeology, Area Ethnic Studies, Civilization Studies, Information Systems, etc.).  Forgive their debt.  So these people can crawl out from underneath their debt and return to some sense of normalcy in their lives.  But the Left will not endorse this same solution for Detroit.  Because the city’s debts just happen to be to the Left’s greatest campaign contributors and constituency.  Public sector unions.  The Left will screw banks and mortgage companies every day of the week.  But when it comes to the public sector unions they’d rather screw the taxpayer.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

The British Press slams President Obama following his Reelection

Posted by PITHOCRATES - November 11th, 2012

Week in Review

One of the harshest printed criticisms of President Obama doesn’t come from the US.  It comes from the UK.  From our friends in Britain.  Who have long been willing to tell kings that they aren’t wearing any clothes (see Under Barack Obama the US superpower faces four more years of decline by Nile Gardiner posted 11/8/2012 on The Telegraph).

The world needs powerful American leadership, the bedrock of which rest upon a sound economy, limited government and free enterprise, as well as a strong national defence. But it certainly won’t be provided by Obama’s imperial presidency. In his first term of office, an administration that worshipped bailouts and big government built up staggering levels of debt that threaten to saddle future generations with the profligate spending of their forefathers. Instead of hope, President Obama offered only the heavy fist of government intervention, rising taxes, increasing poverty and welfare dependency, and an increasingly bitter, angry and insular White House.

There is no reason to expect a different approach in Obama’s second term. His re-election will only embolden his deep-seated left-wing instincts, which are to “transform” the United States into a European-style social democracy. There is good reason why the Obama administration has been a wholehearted backer of the European Project – because it sees its ideals as a role model for America, not a warning.

Under the Obama administration, the very foundations of the world’s only superpower are being undermined by a $16 trillion national debt that has increased by 50 percent under President Obama – a staggering debt per taxpayer of $111,414. Incredibly, US per person debt is now 35 percent higher than that of Greece, according to a chart produced by the Republican side of the Senate Budget Committee. As The Weekly Standard reported earlier this week…

At the same time, economic freedom has declined dramatically, with the United States falling to 10th place in the world rankings, with government spending now exceeding one third of total domestic output. Adding further to the $1 trillion federal budget deficit, the White House has pushed through a vastly expensive health care reform package that harkened back to the failed European social model rather than the American dream.

You’d be hard-pressed to read something like this in a major US paper.  Which explains why print media is going the way of the dodo bird.  In a nation that has conservatives outnumbering liberals 42% to 23% the masses aren’t going to read a paper that is nothing more than an extension of the liberal Democrat Party.  The fact that per capita debt in the US is greater than in Greece is BIG news.  For Greece is falling apart from the weight of a European-style social democracy.  The kind of thing President Obama wants to build in the US.  So that bit of news would have been useful for the people to form an informed opinion on the direction of a second Obama term.  But doing so would have been harmful to the liberal agenda.  So the liberal-leaning press didn’t report this.  And it wasn’t a factor in the 2012 election.

To get any news critical of Obama administration you have to go to FOX News, talk radio or our friends in Britain.  Where they will tear apart any politician.  Including Americans.  Such as George W. Bush.  So even if they endorse European-style social democracy and state institutions like the National Health Service they can still be critical of them.  It would be nice to have a little of that in the US.  A little of Bernstein-Woodward investigative journalism that investigates all politicians.  Not just the ones with an ‘R’ next to their name.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , ,

In California 54% of the People voted to have 1% of the People pay $6 Billion more in Annual Taxes

Posted by PITHOCRATES - November 10th, 2012

Week in Review

The Left is applauding California for voting to raise taxes on the rich.  Saying that California is choosing to be responsible.  While the federal government continually chooses to be irresponsible.  But is this democracy?  Or mob rule?  We can find the answer to these questions easily by understanding what this vote really did (see Californians approve massive tax hike on the wealthy by Tami Luhby posted 11/7/2012 on CNN Money).

Californians approved a measure Tuesday that raises taxes on the wealthy and hikes the state sales tax. It is expected to bring in $6 billion a year, on average, over five years.

Proposition 30, which Governor Jerry Brown has lobbied heavily for, captured 54% of the vote. Its approval prevents massive budget cuts to the state’s public schools and universities…

The wealthiest 1% of Californians — those with annual incomes of $533,000 or more — will shoulder nearly 79% of the tax increase, according to the California Budget Project, a research group that endorsed the proposition. They will see their taxes rise by 1.1% of their income, while the bottom four-fifths of the state’s residents will see an increase of between 0.1% and 0.2% of their incomes…

The measure is expected to raise $8.5 billion in new revenue, according to the Department of Finance. Some $2.9 billion will go to schools, while the remaining $5.6 billion can go toward closing budget gaps.

But the Legislative Analyst’s Office warns that the measure depends heavily on the income of the wealthiest residents, which is volatile and difficult to predict.

So a mob of 54% of the electorate voted to have 1% of the population pay more in taxes.  Who are already paying the lion’s share of taxes.  Problem solved.  Or so they think.  For will these rich people stay in California where a mob can shake them down to pay for more free stuff for those who don’t pay taxes?

Oh, it’s easy to get the mob to increase taxes on others.  Especially if it’s for education.  So students can go to college and get their degrees in film and gender studies.  Degrees that won’t help them get high paying jobs.  But will leave them with more student loan debt.  So why do it?  Because if they didn’t subsidize education more in California how else would they pay for those high university pay and benefits packages?  Which is what is really driving up the cost of education.  For what is education but some books and a lot of people on a university campus?  There is no manufacturing equipment.  No raw material costs.  Education is nothing but overhead.  And an expensive overhead at that.  Just look at the housing the senior professors and administrators live in.  And the lives they enjoy.  They’re the same kind of lives that the so-called 99% demonize business owners and Wall Street types for living.  But because they are on a university campus they get a pass.

A lot of Hollywood moving-making business is leaving California.  Look at the closing titles of some current movies and you will see a lot of them are filmed on location.  Where they can escape the high cost of movie-making in Hollywood, California.  And if the movie-makers are fleeing the high cost of California it would be foolish to think that the richest 1% will not find more agreeable tax locales to invest their money.  And to live.  So don’t count on that additional $6 billion a year yet California.  Because these new tax rates will probably bring in a whole lot less revenue than that.  As increased tax rates always do.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Women are having Fewer Babies and they’re having them Later in Life Guaranteeing Continued Financial Crises

Posted by PITHOCRATES - November 4th, 2012

Week in Review

Aging populations are plaguing advanced economies.  In Japan.  The United States.  Britain.  France.  Spain.  Italy.  Greece.  And others.  All countries with large welfare states.  Large deficits.  And mountains of debt.  Fewer people are entering the workforce than are leaving it.  Resulting in a shrinking tax base.  Requiring higher taxes.  More borrowing.  And when all else fails, budget cuts.  Which is where the British are in trying to keep their NHS solvent.  Cutting 20% from the NHS budget.  While the US added Obamacare to a budget that is already causing record deficits.  Caused by fewer people entering the workforce than are leaving it.  So that’s how we got here.  Now how does the future look (see CDC: U.S. Birth Rate Hits All-Time Low; 40.7% of Babies Born to Unmarried Women by Terence P. Jeffrey posted 10/31/2012 on CNSNews)?

The birth rate in the United States hit an all-time low in 2011, according to a report released this month by the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention…

While the overall birth rate declined to a record low, the birth rates for women in the 35-39 and 40-44 age groups actually increased from 2010 to 2011.

Pretty bleak.  Not only are women having fewer babies they’re waiting another 10-20 years before having them.  Which means when the full costs of Obamacare hit we’ll have perhaps an all-time low of new workers entering the workforce to pay the taxes to fund Obamacare.  And the rest of that swelling welfare state.

In about twenty years our spending obligations will grow too great for taxes and borrowing to pay.  Which means the US will have no choice but to follow the UK.  And make massive spending cuts in our health care.  Resulting in increased wait times.  Rationing.  And perhaps a little Greek-style protesting.  Unless we repeal Obamacare.  And make some serious reforms in our two most costly programs.  Medicare.  And Social Security.  If we do we can save them.  If we don’t we probably can’t save them.  This is the choice we have to make.  Forced onto us by a declining birthrate.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

« Previous Entries   Next Entries »