Week in Review
People don’t want Obamacare. And they are getting angry. Making the Democrats very nervous. Especially those up for election this fall. Which is why there is yet another delay in implementing the Affordable Care Act. To make voters less angry this fall.
This law was never popular. The American people never wanted it. The only reason why we have it is because the Democrats pushed it through when they had control of the House, Senate and White House. And bought off a few recalcitrant Democrat senators (the Louisiana Purchase, Cornhusker Kickback, Gator Aid, etc.) to garner the 60 votes necessary to force this unpopular law onto the American people. So the Democrats could put us on a path towards single-payer. Which President Obama is on the record preferring. Single-payer. But accepted the Affordable Care Act as a means to that end. So we can one day have a health care system like they have in Canada. Because things are so much better in Canada (see Waiting times cost B.C. patients $155.5 million last year: Fraser Institute study by Bethany Lindsay posted 3/25/2014 on The Vancouver Sun).
Waiting for medically necessary surgeries cost British Columbian patients about $155.5 million in lost time last year, a Fraser Institute economist claims in a new study.
It estimates that the total cost to Canadian patients of waiting for treatment after seeing a specialist was $1.1 billion in 2013, up from $982 million in 2012. Quebec had the highest cost at $267.7 million.
Author Nadeem Esmail said the report explores a consequence of waiting for care that Canadians don’t often consider…
Esmail said that in order to address the problem of long waiting times, he’d like to see Canada allow more private sector participation in the provision of health care, including the development of a parallel private system…
Overall, British Columbians waited a median 10.4 weeks for treatment after their first appointment with a specialist last year, compared to 9.6 weeks across Canada, according to the study.
Imagine that. The Republicans were right. A single-payer health care system leads to rationing of health care resources. And sick people waiting for their turn for fewer, rationed health care resources leads to, of course, longer wait times. This is what the Democrats want to force on the American people. Even when some in Canada are suggesting a parallel private health care system to reduce wait times down from 10 weeks or so. Which is why the Democrats had to be as devious as possible to pass Obamacare into law. With shady backroom deals like the Louisiana Purchase, Cornhusker Kickback and Gator Aid. And then lying through their teeth about being able to keep the health insurance and doctors you liked and wanted to keep. A lie so bold it earned President Obama the Lie of the Year from PolitiFact.
Will this anger boil over this November at the 2014 midterm elections? Will voters remember how the Democrats lied and made backroom deals to change a health care system we liked and wanted to keep? Apparently President Obama thinks so. Which is why he violated the law once again and extended the enrollment period for Obamacare. Without having Congress rewrite the law. To make this latest change in the Affordable Care Act (and the 30 or so that preceded it) legal. But then again, when the media keeps giving the president a pass on his law-breaking activities what incentive does the administration have to act lawful? It’s kind of like Vladimir Putin taking Crimea. The way Putin sees it no one is going to do anything when he breaks the law so what incentive does he have to abide by international law? If anything he’s probably puzzled why President Obama is saying anything at all. For what’s a little law-breaking between two law breakers?
Tags: Affordable Care Act, backroom deals, British Columbia, Canada, Cornhusker Kickback, Democrats, Gator Aid, Louisiana Purchase, Obamacare, parallel private health care system, President Obama, rationing, Single payer, wait time
Week in Review
What’s unique about Windsor, Ontario? The city across the river from Detroit? It’s the only place you can drive south from the United States to get to Canada. So it’s about as far south you can get in Canada. But it’s no Florida. No. They have cold winters in Windsor. They also have snow. And clouds. So it’s probably not the best place to build a solar farm. Any rational person would see this. So guess what the government in southern Ontario is doing? Building a solar farm (see Airport land leased for Samsung solar farm by Chris Vander Doelen posted 3/19/2014 on The Windsor Star).
A “major” developer of solar power will lease hundreds of acres at Windsor Airport for a green energy farm, city council has agreed after years of negotiations with the company…
He said the company picked Windsor as the site for its investment because “we have more sun days than any other jurisdiction in Ontario.” That clearly suggests a solar farm, but Francis wouldn’t confirm that…
The agreement approved Wednesday – the meeting was closed to the public for legal reasons, Francis said – is believed to be the final, long-delayed piece of a massive deal the Province of Ontario and Samsung announced in January 2010.
That’s when former premier Dalton McGuinty announced that the province had signed a $7-billion agreement to produce renewable power with the Korean industrial giant – a contract that became so controversial parts of it were later renegotiated…
But the deal also became controversial as the costs starting driving up residential and industrial power bills, all of which will be affected by the renewable energy plan.
The controversy eventually led to reductions in some of the feed-in tariffs paid to producers of solar and wind power, which likely added to the delays of the solar farm not announced until this week. It also led to the renegotiation of additional incentives for Samsung, which were reduced to $110 million over 20 years…
Installation of the panels would generate many years of employment for an undetermined number of labourers and IBEW electricians. But once built there wouldn’t be much employment generated by the static field of passive solar collectors.
The solar farms were to be part of something called the Ontario Alternative Energy Cluster, claimed by Samsung to be “the largest of its kind in the world” at 1,369 megawatts of output.
They may have more sun days in Windsor than any place else in Canada. But Canada is a northern country. Even Windsor is in a northern clime. And they just don’t get as much sun as they do in more southern climes (see The Climate and Weather of Windsor, Ontario). In the sunniest month they have 9.5 average hours of sun per day. Which means they have 14.5 (24-9.5) average hours of no sun per day. And during these hours of ‘no sun’ a solar farm will not produce electric power. Which means on average this solar farm will produce no electric power for half of the day.
And it gets worse. The average hours of sun per day declines going into winter. October (5.5 hours of sun and 18.5 hours of no sun). November (4.1 hours of sun and 19.9 hours of no sun). December (2.6 hours of sun and 21.4 hours of no sun). January (3.4 hours of sun and 20.6 hours of no sun). February (4.4 hours of sun and 19.6 hours of no sun). March (5.4 hours of sun and 18.6 hours of no sun). So, on average, there are 5 hours of no sun for every hour of sun for half of the year. So you can install solar panels that could produce 1,369 megawatts of output. But they seldom will. So you will need another power source to provide electric power when the solar panels don’t. Which means a solar farm can’t replace something like a coal-fired power plant. For that coal-fired power plant will have to on average provide power 82% of the time. Which is why building a solar farm is a real bad idea.
And it gets even worse. December has 10 days of snowfall on average. January has 12. And February has 9. Just under half the days in the winter months will have snow which will have to melt off when the sun comes out from behind the clouds. If it comes out. Or someone will have to clear the snow from the solar panels by hand.
Windsor also has some other climate statistics (see National Climate Data and Information Archive). They have the most thunderstorm days. So they have more high winds, hail and tornados to damage delicate solar panels pointed skyward than any other part of Canada. And more black overcast days to block out the sun. They have the most smoke and haze days to filter out some of the sun from hitting the solar panels. They have the most humid summer which will coat the solar panels with early morning dew that will run down and drain off in blackened streaks. Reducing the efficiency of the solar panels.
This is why no one is building solar farms without taxpayer subsidies. Which raises the cost of electric utility bills to pay for the subsidies. Eating into household budgets forcing families to get by on less. And for what? You can’t shut down a coal-fired power plant during the day and turn it back on at night. It takes time to make high pressure steam. That’s why they use these plants for baseload power. They’re on all the time. And when demand picks up they add a natural gas-fired turbine ‘peaker plant’ to provide that peak demand. Or some other source that they can bring on line quickly. Like another turbine at a hydroelectric dam. So the good people of Ontario will pay more for their electric power without getting anything in return. Not even a cleaner environment. Because you just can’t replace a coal-fired power plant with a solar farm.
Tags: Canada, Coal, coal-fired power plant, electric power, electrical utility, Ontario, power plant, snow, solar farm, subsidies, sun, sun days, utility bills, Windsor
Week in Review
The left likes to say we’re idiots here in the United States. Because every other advanced economy has national health care. Of course, every other advanced economy doesn’t have the best health care system in the world. No. That honor goes to the United States. And perhaps NOT having national health care is the reason why we have the best health care system in the world. For those national health care systems have their problems. Even the system north of the border the American left yearns to have. The Canadian single-payer system (see New B.C. seniors advocate to focus on needs of growing elderly population by ROB SHAW posted 3/19/2014 on The Vancouver Sun).
Isobel Mackenzie, a longtime Victoria seniors care administrator, was named Wednesday as the province’s first seniors advocate, more than 16 months after the office was first announced…
There are more than 700,000 seniors in B.C. and that’s expected to double to 1.4 million over the next 20 years…
Mackenzie said she’s not sure if her office will get involved in how hospital overcrowding is affecting seniors care, and sidestepped a reporter’s question at her press conference Wednesday about the case of an elderly man who had spent eight hours waiting in a hospital emergency room…
“Obviously, health care is a priority and home care – giving support to people so they can stay at their home and healthy,” she said.
Logan said the government tried an “experiment” of providing funding to United Way but they’ve been “overloaded with requests.”
All of the advanced economies share something in common. They all have an aging population. Thanks to birth control and abortion people in the advanced economies stopped having babies after the Sixties like they used to have. Which is why the seniors are now the largest growing sector of the population. We have fewer people entering the workforce to pay the taxes that support a greater number of people leaving the workforce. And thanks to modern medicine, these people are living long into retirement. Which is why Canadian hospitals in British Columbia are overcrowded. Which lead to longer wait times and the rationing of care. Things common with national health care. And these things are only going to get worse as their aging populations age further.
This is the future of Obamacare. For the Affordable Care Act is already proving unaffordable to those who have to pay. And people are losing the health insurance and the doctors they liked and wanted to keep. A lot of doctors are opting out of Obamacare. Leaving fewer in the system to treat a larger number of patients. Which will, of course, lead to longer wait times and the rationing of care. Just like in Canada. And in every other advanced economy with a national health care system. Which is why the United States is the only advanced economy without a national health care system. Because Americans don’t want longer wait times and the rationing of care. And they don’t want the Affordable Care Act.
Tags: advanced economies, Affordable Care Act, aging population, British Columbia, Canadian single-payer system, doctors, hospitals, longer wait times, National health care, Obamacare, overcrowding, patients, rationing, seniors, single-payer system, wait times
Week in Review
Cities and governments have long loved big industry. Unions, too. Because they’re big. And are difficult to move. Such as an automobile assembly plant. They take a lot of real estate. Require a lot of specialized production and assembly equipment. And a lot of infrastructure to support them. Making them very difficult to move. But not impossible (see Chrysler spurns government money, Windsor to build minivans posted 3/4/2014 on CBC News Windsor).
Chrysler will continue to build its popular minivan in Windsor, Ont., and has withdrawn all requests for government financial assistance in relation to the redevelopment of its assembly plants in Windsor and Brampton…
At the Detroit auto show seven weeks ago, Chrysler CEO Sergio Marchionne said that changes at the Windsor plant alone would cost at least $2 billion, and that Chrysler needed government help to finance the project.
Chrysler said in a media release Tuesday it will now “fund out of its own resources whatever capital requirements the Canadian operations require.”
Industry Minister James Moore said the government’s commitment to the auto industry is strong and he was surprised by Chrysler’s decision.
Essex Conservative MP Jeff Watson, whose riding is just south of Windsor, said he believed talks were going well.
“We were prepared to invest in exchange for guarantees for Canadian production and a Canadian supply chain,” Watson said.
Money from the government doesn’t come without strings. And the string here was a guarantee that Chrysler wouldn’t leave. No matter how costly the government or union contracts made it to stay in Windsor. Costs that Chrysler has to recover in the sales price of their cars. Which can’t be so high as to price them out of the market. So Chrysler chose to spend their own money. So they didn’t get stuck in an adverse economic situation when trying to compete in a global market.
“It is clear to us that our projects are now being used as a political football, a process that, in our view, apart from being unnecessary and ill-advised, will ultimately not be to the benefit of Chrysler,” the company said in a news release.
“As a result, Chrysler will deal in an unfettered fashion with its strategic alternatives regarding product development and allocation, and will fund out of its own resources whatever capital requirements the Canadian operations require.”
The government wanted what was best for them. Economic activity they could tax. While Chrysler wanted what was best for them. Being able to sell cars at market prices. And leaving their options open in the future. Should it become too costly to continue to build cars in Canada. Due to the cost of labor. Or new regulatory policies. Or higher taxes to fund a welfare state struggling under the costs of an aging population. Governments are desperate for new tax revenue. And will make almost any promise to get it. Making long-term deals with governments risky.
According to the Ontario government, the auto sector employs 94,000 Ontarians, and supports as many as 500,000 families through indirect jobs…
Unifor Local 444 president Dino Chiodo, who represents hourly employees in Windsor, said he wasn’t completely surprised by Marchionne’s announcement…
Chiodo said Tuesday’s announcement is short of the $2-billion retooling and flexible manufacturing line employees were looking for in Windsor…
Chiodo said a $2.3-billion investment would secure three generations of minivans, which could secure jobs for decades…
Marchionne also wants union concessions.
Yes, they love the jobs these corporations create. And all that economic activity those jobs create. Economic activity they can’t create. But they still hate corporations. That’s why they tax them. Regulate them. Call them greedy. Exploiters of labor. And that the only way they can get them to do something decent is by making deals with them that favor them and not these evil corporations. But sometimes these evil corporations don’t enter agreements that may harm them in the long run. And when they do governments and unions panic. As they fear they may have let a cash piñata slip through their fingers. Which is a problem for them. For they can’t create a single job those evil corporations can.
Tags: Canada, Chrysler, corporations, evil corporations, government money, guarantee, jobs, Marchionne, minivan, Ontario, union, Windsor
Week in Review
International law restricts the kind of bullets we can use in war. In general, they have to have a full metal jacket. So they don’t flatten out in flight and make big holes in bodies. Causing great suffering and trauma to anyone wounded. Which is why today a lot of soldiers can survive from gunshot wounds. Whereas the lead Minié balls of the American Civil War did horrific damage to tissue and bone. Shattering bone such that any arm or leg wound typically resulted in an amputation. And a belly wound meant death. For it just did so much damage to the internal organs that there was no repairing them. Much like another horrific belly wound. From a bayonet. As it made a long, wide wound. Often running in one side of a man and out the other. And doing irreparable damage.
Even today a knife wound can cause more damage than a bullet. Because it makes such a large hole through a body. Making long and deep cuts in internal organs. Also, a person has to be close to use a knife. He can’t stab someone from a distance. Like you can shoot someone with a gun from a distance. So anyone willing to stab someone is pretty cold-blooded. As you see, hear and feel a person’s death. And anyone that can do that is a very dangerous person. Especially with our lax knife-control laws (see Two dead, two wounded in separate GTA stabbings by Chris Doucette posted 2/13/2014 on the Toronto Sun).
TORONTO – Two men were killed and two others were wounded in three separate stabbings within hours of each other in the GTA [Greater Toronto Area].
The bloodshed began just after 9 p.m. Wednesday in Rexdale, Toronto Police said, and it kept emergency responders busy for several hours.
Every time there is a shooting in the United States the left calls for stricter gun-control legislation. As if that would remove all violent crime in the country. Because if a person can’t get a gun that person can’t shoot anyone with a gun. And they would never think about picking up a knife to harm someone. Which would leave the bad guys with nothing to do but to link arms and sing Kumbaya. Like they do in Canada. Well, everyone in Canada but those picking up knives to stab people. Funny how in Canada they don’t blame knives for these crimes. Or demand more restrictive knife-control legislation in Canada every time someone gets stabbed. Like some Americans blame guns for gun crimes in the United States. And try to restrict gun ownership every chance they get.
Tags: bullet, gun, gun control, gun control legislation, gun crime, knife, knife wound, knives, shooting, stabbing
Week in Review
People just don’t hate Wal-Mart in the United States. The Canadians don’t like them either. Or, at least, some Canadians (see Developer backs away from plan to put Walmart in Kensington Market by BRUCE LAREGINA AND TARA PERKINS posted 2/13/2014 on The Globe and Mail).
Kensington Market appears to have won the war against Walmart.
The latest pitch to the city from RioCan, the real-estate company developing a site near Bathurst and Nassau streets, no longer includes a big-box Walmart and would shrink the project’s retail area…
“We pushed back hard on this,” said Mr. Layton, who has advocated against Walmart for nearly two and a half years. “The pressure put on Walmart and RioCan from our community backed them off from putting it in our area…”
“As a resident of Kensington Market for my entire life, it looks like a wonderful compromise,” she said. “They were potentially a threat for the businesses in not only Kensington, but in Little Italy and Chinatown as well.
Social democracies everywhere decry capitalism. And businesses. Because all they care about are profits. Which they amass by gouging people with high prices. This is unfair. And cruel. People deserve low prices. Enter government to fetter unfettered capitalism. To make it fair. And in the case here that means making sure the local businesses can continue to sell at higher prices.
A business making a profit with high prices is a bad thing. Unless a Wal-Mart threatens to come in and offer a greater variety of goods at lower prices. Which will benefit the people. By proving jobs with better benefits than most Mom and Pop shops can provide. And allowing people’s paychecks to go farther thanks to those low prices. But they can’t have that in Kensington Market. Or any big Democrat U.S. city. Because Wal-Mart does these wonderful things with a nonunion workforce. And that’s something liberals just can’t have. Even if it means higher prices for the people.
Tags: businesses, Canadians, capitalism, high prices, Kensington Market, profits, Wal-Mart
Week in Review
The American left likes to hold up the Canadian health care system as the ideal system. It’s what they wanted when they reluctantly accepted Obamacare. A single-payer health care system. Or national health care. Because those on the left believe the quality of a national health care system far exceeds anything a for-profit insurance company will pay for. As they deny whatever they can to force people into a third-world health care system. Where only the rich who can afford to pay for the best get the best. Interestingly, it appears that’s happening in Canada, too. Where those who can afford to are traveling elsewhere for their health care instead of entering their own Canadian system (see Canadians Leave Their Country For Better Health Care posted 1/22/2014 on Investors).
According to data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information, as many as 41,838 Canadians — out of a population of about 35 million — left the country last year for health care treatment. More than 42,000 left in 2012, while more than 46,000 sought treatment elsewhere the year before.
Destinations, according to a University of Minnesota study that looked at Canadian companies that arrange medical tourism, include Costa Rica, India, Thailand and the U.S. Some companies even send clients to Mexico, Turkey, Poland and the Dominican Republic.
The Fraser Institute of Canada calls the 2013 figure a conservative estimate and, though some will argue otherwise, believes it is a sizable number, one that says something deeply damning about Canadian care…
“One of the unfortunate realities of Canada’s monopolistic health care system is that some people feel they have no choice but to seek the care they need outside the country,” Esmail and Bacchus Barua wrote in an op-ed published last month in a couple of Canadian newspapers. “And who can blame them..?”
Some leave due to Canada’s long and sometimes deadly waiting periods. Others are treated outside the country because there is “a lack of available resources or the fact that some procedures or equipment are not provided in their home jurisdiction,” Esmail and Barua wrote.
If you want to know who has the best health care system just look at the direction of medical tourism. And people traveling for their health care aren’t going to Canada. They’re going to Costa Rica, India, Thailand, the United States, Mexico, Turkey, Poland and the Dominican Republic. But they’re not going to Canada. Even some Canadians refuse their own health care system. So do these countries have better health care systems? Not necessarily.
In an episode of Breaking Bad when Gus went to Mexico to deliver Jesse to the Cartel to cook for them he turned the tables on the cartel. He poisoned the members of the Cartel with a gift bottle of tequila. A bottle Gus was the first to drink from. To prove it was safe to drink. Of course he took precautions to prevent himself dying from drinking the poisoned tequila. Including a makeshift emergency room in an abandoned building near the US-Mexican border. Even stocked with bags of blood matched to the blood types of the three who traveled to Mexico. They saved Gus from the poison. And Mike from a near-fatal gunshot wound.
This was quality health care in the middle of nowhere. Paid for with private money. Albeit drug money. But the health care providers were making more there than they could in the regular health care system. Providing them incentive. Which all of these medical tourism destinations offer. Incentive to health care workers to work outside of the regular health care system. Because they can earn more in a private health care system. Which is why the best health care talent migrates to private health care systems. Because when people pay out of pocket there’s more money to pay for the best health care. And to pay the best health care salaries and wages. Everyone wins in the private system. Patients. And health care providers. The only losers are those stuck in their own national health care system while they wait for their ‘free’ health care.
Tags: Canada, incentive, medical tourism, National health care, Obamacare, private, private health care system, Single payer
Week in Review
Obamacare so far has been a disaster. The website is a billion dollar embarrassment for the Obama administration. The lack of enrollees. Far more old and sick signing up than young and healthy. Millions of people losing the health insurance they liked and wanted to keep. People losing their doctors. People going to doctors thinking they have health insurance only to find out they don’t. The health insurers are looking at huge losses unless they get a federal bailout. Even the credit rating agencies have said the entire health insurance industry is in danger of going belly up because of Obamacare.
Still the Obamacare supporters say everything will be fine. Just give it time. Sure, there has been a bump or two during the rollout. But it’s getting better every day. While there are some who are saying these problems are all due to the insurance companies. And that we need to cut them out of the loop. And go with a single-payer system. Like they have in Canada. So we can at last have the same high-quality system they have where everyone has everything they need when they need it regardless of cost. A health care utopia. Where if you’re sick it doesn’t matter if you’re rich or poor. You’ll get to wait the same 4 hours to see a doctor as everyone else in Canada has to wait (see Would you pay to not wait in your doctor’s waiting room? This company is betting on it by Erin Anderssen posted 1/22/2014 on The Globe and Mail).
In your hand, you hold the number 52. The nurse shepherding patients through the walk-in clinic just called 12, which means you can expect to be waiting hours.
What’s your time worth? A Montreal-based company is betting you’d be willing to pay less than the equivalent of a grande latte for your “freedom” from the coughing, sniffling and tedium of a doctor’s waiting room. Chronometriq has created a text service – $3 in Quebec (and the expected cost of $4 in Ontario) – that will buzz you on your phone as your number approaches. The company expects the technology, now in place in 24 clinics in Quebec, to expand to 50 walk-in clinics by spring, including some Ontario locations, pending approval from the provincial health ministry.
Its next stop is hospital emergency rooms, where Canadians endure longer waits than citizens of 11 other OECD countries, according to a study released last year.
But it’s also controversial: After all, the program introduces a questionable user-pay element to Canada’s health care system. (The program is optional – you can still save your pennies and linger in the waiting room.)
As Natalie Mehra, executive director of the Ontario Health Coalition, points out, it won’t do anything to reduce actual wait times in ERs, where according to the international study 31 per cent of Canadian wa[i]ted more than four hours to be seen by a doctor in 2010. (The average among all countries included was 12 per cent.) “It is not improving access to care at all,” Mehra says. “The issue is people waiting too long to get in the door.”
That’s the point, argues Louis Parent, Chronometriq vice-president. “How many years have government said they will tackle wait times. And nothing has changed. We have to face facts.”
Critics of national health care say it will lead to rationing and longer wait times. As it has in Canada. Why? Because government can’t do anything well. The huge bureaucracy adds costs by adding layers of people between doctors and patients. To determine what treatment a doctor may provide for his or her patient. More and more health care dollars pay for the bureaucracy instead of actually treating patients. While at the same time an aging population is reducing the number of taxpayers while increasing the number of people consuming taxpayer-funded health care services. Which means health care providers have to do more with less. They have to carefully ration what they have. Which leads to longer waiting times as patients wait their turn for those limited health care services.
This is where the left wants to take the American health care system to. Even as countries around the world are having the same problems Canada has. Many of which are privatizing parts of their national health care. Even Canada. Who is now charging some patients for the privilege of receiving a text to tell them when their 4 hours of waiting are nearly up. Of course the Canadians are having these problems because they are not as smart as the American left. Who after never doing it before will know how to do national health care right. Just look at how well they rolled out Obamacare.
Tags: Canada, clinic, doctor, emergency room, health insurance, hospital, insurance companies, insurers, National health care, Obamacare, Ontario, patient, Quebec, Single payer, wait, wait times, waiting room
Week in Review
The United States Postal Service (USPS) is going broke. Thanks to email, texting and online bill paying. Making the USPS more and more irrelevant these days. And it’s not just the USPS having this problem (see Ontario mother with sick child urges Canada Post to keep door-to-door delivery by The Canadian Press posted 1/13/2014 on City News Toronto).
An online petition urging Canada Post to reconsider its decision to end door-to-door delivery in urban centres has garnered more than 120,000 signatures…
Canada Post announced some dramatic changes to its operations last month, including plans to phase out the age-old tradition of home delivery in urban areas. The company said that without postal carriers travelling by foot, it would save a significant amount of money…
The petition — posted on the website change.org — draws attention to anyone in Canada who has limited mobility, such as the elderly or disabled, and the possibly dangerous effects this change could have on their lives…
Hamilton said that Canada Post is trying to maintain service to all Canadians but that they need to find innovative ways to do it in order to remain self-sufficient.
Canada Post had projected an annual loss of $1 billion dollars a year by 2020 if they were to continue with the door-to-door delivery.
Part of the reason why Canada can’t afford to keep urban delivery is because they have single-payer health care. Which is pretty costly. Especially with Canada having what all advanced economies have. An aging population. Which means more people are leaving the workforce and consuming taxpayer benefits than there are people entering the workforce paying taxes. And with better health care people are living longer into retirement. Which forces tax rates higher on the working (i.e., the young and healthy) to pay for those not working.
It is interesting that the same people, the young and healthy, are the ones destroying Canadian Post. For they’re the ones emailing, texting and paying bills online. Which means they will have to raise taxes further on the young and healthy to support the older generation. Transferring more and more costs from the old to the young. Which is what happens in a socialist country. Generational theft. Costs keep rising so people have smaller families. Causing the population to age. And requiring ever higher tax rates on those in the workforce to pay for the growing numbers who have left the workforce.
Tags: aging population, Canada Post, door-to-door delivery, email, online bill paying, texting, USPS, workforce, young and healthy
Week in Review
The latest jobs report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics showed that for every person that entered the workforce in December seven people left the workforce (see The BLS Employment Situation Summary for December 2013 posted 1/13/2014 on PITHOCRATES). In fact, since President Obama assumed the presidency 11,301,000 people have left the labor force. Despite his policies to create greener and higher-paying jobs to replace the jobs in the coal and oil industries he destroyed.
For America was going green. Whether we wanted to or not. Pity, because we’d have a lot more high-paying jobs in the coal and oil industry had it not been for President Obama. North Dakota is doing really well thanks to natural gas production on private land. Not much he can do to shut that down. And just to the north things are going very well in the oil business (see Oil patch salaries rise 5 times as fast as rest of Canada posted 1/13/2014 on CBC News).
The average salary of young men working in Canada’s oil patch increased by 21 per cent between 2001 and 2008, more than five times the pace of gain seen by those workers in other parts of the country.
According to a report published by Statistics Canada Monday, men aged 17 to 24 living in the oil-producing provinces of Alberta, Saskatchewan and Newfoundland and Labrador were more likely to have a job than their counterparts in other areas, less likely to still be in school, and more likely to earn more.
Kids graduating college with worthless social science and humanity degrees have a boatload of student loan debt. And little prospect of a job in a high-tech economy. Had some of these kids had a chance to get a high-paying job in the oil industry instead of getting those worthless degrees they probably wouldn’t be living in their parent’s basement. With that huge student loan debt hanging over them like the Sword of Damocles.
It’s a pity that the Americans can’t learn a lesson from the smarter Canadians when it comes to energy. If we had pursued Canadian energy policies instead of Obama policies 11,301,000 people wouldn’t have left the labor force during his presidency. For a good number of these people would now be in the oil business. In the oil pipeline business. In the oil refining business. In the refined oil distribution system. And all of the Mom and Pop stores catering to this influx of economic activity all along the way. That’s what we could have had if we didn’t have President Obama.
Tags: Canada, Coal, high-paying job, jobs, oil, oil business, oil industry, President Obama, student loan debt, workforce
« Previous Entries