Week in Review
All you hear from Democrats is that we need to spend more on education. They call it investing in our future. Which is a lie. For ‘investing in our future’ is code for shoring up teachers’ pensions. And keeping higher education doing what those in control of higher education want it to do. Produce Democrat voters. Which actually starts in our public schools. Where they teach our kids to come home and tell their parents that they are ashamed of them. For all the global warming they’ve caused. And bringing them into the world in the evil, rotten United States.
These are the things our kids seem to know about. Global warming. Slavery. Stealing land from the Native Americans. American imperialism. But ask them to name the first four presidents of the United States? Four of the greatest Americans ever to live? Those in control of our public education don’t think knowing anything about them is important. Apparently (see Rolling Stone, Groupon Show The Viral Benefits of Historical Inaccuracy by Nathan Raab posted 4/11/2014 on Forbes).
In 2007, a US Mint poll showed that only 7 percent of those surveyed could name the first four Presidents in order. A later poll by Marist was not more encouraging.
George Washington (#1) kept the Continental Army together for 8 years under circumstances few could imagine today. Near the end of the Revolutionary War his character alone put down a mutiny in the officer corps. He turned down the offer to make him king. An unprecedented act at the time. King George of Britain had said if he turned down absolute power “he will be the greatest man in the world.” And Washington did. Twice. His presence was the only thing that got the states to ratify the Constitution. And his two terms in office was the only thing that gave the United States of America a chance of succeeding. This is why there is only one man we call the Father of his Country. And only one man we call the Indispensible Man. George Washington.
John Adams (#2) was a driving force for American independence. So much so that King George could not forgive him. Had they reconciled with the mother country the king would have pardoned many patriots. But not Adams. He would hang. Adams nominated George Washington to command the Continental Army. He chose Thomas Jefferson to write the Declaration of Independence. He worked with Benjamin Franklin to negotiate the peace treaty that ended the Revolutionary War. And negotiated America’s first loan from Amsterdam bankers. The first nation to recognize and do business with the new nation (other than France). And he averted war with France following the French Revolution. Giving the fledgling nation a chance to survive.
Thomas Jefferson (#3) was the author of Declaration of Independence. The author of the Statute of Virginia for Religious Freedom. And the Father of the University of Virginia. The three things Jefferson was most proud of and appear on his tombstone. As president his administration bought the Louisiana Territory from the French. More than doubling the size of the United States. And sent out Lewis and Clark to explore these vast new territories. And he slashed government spending wherever he could. A true believer in limited government.
James Madison (#4) is the Father of the Constitution. He wrote the Federalist Papers with Alexander Hamilton and John Jay to encourage ratification of the Constitution. The Federalist Papers are still referenced today in Constitutional law. He also helped the effort to ratify the Constitution in Virginia where he battled the great patriot Patrick Henry. Who feared a large central government. Madison served in the first Congress. Where he championed the Bill of Rights. And, later, supervised the Louisiana Purchase as President Jefferson’s Secretary of State.
It is indeed a sad commentary on our educational system that only 7% of those questioned could identify these great Americans. And it’s not a lack of money causing this. It’s a lacking in the curriculum. Choosing global warming, slavery, stealing land from the Native Americans, American imperialism, etc. Instead of teaching our kids why the United States is the greatest country in the world. Because of men like these. Who put the individual before the state. Who made freedom and liberty things we take for granted. Instead of things people can only dream of. Which is the case in much of the world today. And has been the norm throughout history.
Tags: Adams, Bill of Rights, Constitution, Continental Army, Declaration of Independence, Federalist Papers, first four presidents, George Washington, Global Warming, imperialism, independence, James Madison, Jefferson, John Adams, king, King George, Louisiana Purchase, Louisiana Territory, Madison, presidents, Revolutionary War, slavery, stealing land, Thomas Jefferson, United States, Washington
Week in Review
The Founding Fathers owned slaves. They took the Indians’ land. They said all men were created equal but they treated women as second class citizens for over a hundred years. Rich white men wrote the Constitution for rich white men. These Christian barbarians even burned witches at the stake in their early history. At least, these are things we hear the Left say all of the time about our Founding Fathers. Their Constitution. And the God-forsaken country they created. These are the things they are teaching in our public schools and in our universities. With no consideration of the context of time. Unlike they give to every other culture on the planet. Including cultures that ritually sacrificed their own people (see ‘Conclusive’ evidence of human sacrifice found in Mexico posted 5/3/2012 on The Telegraph).
Mexico’s National Institute of Anthropology and History said the finding clearly corroborates accounts from later cultures about the use of sharp obsidian knives in sacrificing humans…
The collection of stone knives is from the little-known Cantona culture, which flourished just after the mysterious city-state of Teotihuacan. Cantona preceded by more than 1,000 years the region’s most famous human sacrifice practitioners, the Aztecs…
While historical accounts from Aztec times, as well as drawings and paintings from earlier cultures, had long suggested that priests used knives and other instruments for non-life-threatening bloodletting rituals, the presence of the muscle and tendon traces indicates the cuts were deep and intended to sever portions of the victim’s body…
Gillespie said human sacrifice practices either described by the Spanish conquerors or depicted in pre-Conquest paintings include heart removal, decapitation, dismemberment, disembowelling and skinning of victims.
To hear those on the Left speak all Americans are guilty for the sins of the Founding Fathers. Which when taken in the grander scheme of things weren’t that bad. At least they were nowhere as bad as the sins of the Cantona. Or the Aztecs. Who did some really horrible things.
Human sacrifice and cannibalism made it into the 20th century in some remote tribes. But the Left will never condemn these people like they condemn the Founding Fathers. They will treat their culture with respect for their ancient religious beliefs. While calling Christians every derogatory name in the book. They will put the religious ceremonies of the Cantona and the Aztecs into the context of their time. While judging the Founding Fathers by today’s standards. Why is that?
When one is blatantly biased against a group of people one can only conclude that they don’t like that group of people. Or the country they created. Even though their country never condoned ritual human sacrifice. And when you put the Founding Fathers into the context of their times they were pretty enlightened when compared to countries in the Old World. As well as the ancient cultures of the New World.
Tags: Aztecs, Cantona, Christian, Constitution, context of time, culture, Founding Fathers, human sacrifice, Mexico, rich white men, ritual human sacrifice, white men
Week in Review
I believe it was George Bernard Shaw who said that the British and the Americans are two peoples separated by a common language. And we are. After all, the British sired the Americans. It was British customs, British laws and British representative government that flowered into the United States. Sure, we had our moments. And a civil war (what we call the Revolutionary War). But even the defining document of that war has some British roots. For one of the Founding Father’s greatest inspirations was an Englishman. John Locke. Who believed that government ruled only at the consent of the governed. Powerful stuff for its time. Greatly influenced the English. And Thomas Jefferson as he wrote the Declaration of Independence.
In time, though, America would surpass the United Kingdom. For the UK moved away from their glorious past. Into a socialist future. Joining the social democracies of Europe. Who are all standing at a great precipice. The weight of their debt and social spending threatening to pull them over. And Daniel Hannan, Briton and Member of the European Parliament, looks behind and sees the Americans rushing up behind them to join them in their perilous leap over the edge. He speaks to them. Warning them not to make the same mistakes they are making. To go back to their Founding Principles. Of which this Briton holds dear. And to change their ways. For it may be too late on his side of the Atlantic. But it’s not too late for the Americans.
This is the gist of Daniel Hannan’s speech at CPAC. And if you want to look into America’s future based on the road we are currently on, watch his speech (see Video: Daniel Hannan’s warning to CPAC — and America by Ed Morrissey posted 2/12/2012 on Hot Air).
Tags: Americans, British, CPAC, Daniel Hannan, Europe, Founding Principles
The Allies were Commanded by an American because they had the Greatest Skin in the Game
During World War II, SHAEF stood for the Supreme Headquarters, Allied Expeditionary Forces. This was the top command of the Allies fighting on the Western Front during World War II. In the European Theater of Operations (ETO). The Soviet Union fought on the Eastern Front. Neither front was subordinate to the other in the command structure.
The supreme allied commander of SHAEF was General Eisenhower. An American. Why? Well the Nazis conquered France early in the war. Thanks to blitzkrieg. Which the Allies weren’t ready yet to battle. So the SHAEF commander wasn’t French. But the British were in the war from the beginning. They and their commonwealth put some 11 million into the field of battle. And suffered about a million killed and wounded. But the SHAEF commander wasn’t British either. Even though we couldn’t have defeated Nazi Germany without the British.
No, the SHAEF commander was an American because they put some 16 million into the field of battle. So excluding the Soviets, the Americans had the greatest skin in the game. Literally. And figuratively. It was the American Arsenal of Democracy that furnished the implements of war. Financed by the American taxpayer. Via bonds. Rationing. And inflation.
Those who Risk their Wealth should have a Say in How it is Risked
There were a lot of service flags hanging in American windows during World War II. And far too many of them had gold stars on them. One gold star represented the loss of a son or daughter in the war. There were about 417,000 gold stars in American windows. Not quite as many as the approximately 580,000 British dead. And a long way from the approximately 8,600,000 Soviet dead. But as America entered the war, the sheer numbers of man and material America provided made it America’s war. Which is why there was an American commanding SHAEF. Because even though Nazi Germany didn’t attack America, it was her blood and treasure leading the war against Nazi Germany.
So an American general would lead the Allies. Because the Americans had the most skin in the game. They were now bearing the greatest costs for the war. So they had the ultimate say in how the Allies waged war. I mean, no one would expect a Belgian general to command those 16 million Americans. No offense to the Belgians. I mean, I like their waffles and all. It’s just that Belgium wasn’t America. They didn’t have the resources. Nor the distance from the Third Reich.
Risk and wealth. Those who risk their wealth should have a say in how it is risked. Because it takes wealth (blood and treasure) to wage war. And this goes back to the birth of limited government. The Magna Carta. When the feudal barons of England met King John on the fields of Runnymede. And said, “Look, yeah you’re king and all but that doesn’t give you the right to do as you bloody well please.” I’m paraphrasing, of course. You see, the king was being rather oppressive. And fighting a lot of wars. Costly wars. And the funny thing about kings? They don’t have wealth. They get it from the landowners. The landed aristocracy. Those feudal barons. The men and material to fight wars, and the money to pay for them, came from them. So these barons were saying, “In the future, you clear things with us first, okay?” And constitutional monarchy was born.
Thanks to the Magna Carta those Paying the Taxes would have a Say in How the King Spent those Taxes
In the days of feudalism we defined wealth by land holdings. Because back then the most important industry was growing food. To prevent famine. And you needed land to grow food. So wealth concentrated to the land owners. The landed aristocracy. Who provided the food for the realm. Soldiers. And taxes.
Thanks to the Magna Carta, things changed. Those paying the taxes would have a say in how the king spent those taxes. He couldn’t wage endless war anymore. Or spend it all on royal accouterments. No. From then on, spending would have to be responsible. We take it for granted in the West today. And call it taxation with representation. But it was a BIG deal back then. And mostly only in England. France had an absolute monarchy. And the king did whatever he bloody well pleased. And you see how well that turned out for King Louis XVI. Ask Marie Antoinette. Of course you can’t. Because they were both executed by the people during the French Revolution.
The British took their representative government to the New World. And after the American Revolution, that was one of the British things the Americans kept. At the heart of the American populace was a hatred of taxation. And arbitrary rule. So they kept a tight grip on the government. And their wealth. There were no kings in the new United States of America. But there was still government. And a strong distrust of government power. So they were going to write their constitutions very carefully. And restrict the vote only to those who had skin in the game. Land owners. Who were paying the taxes.
Figuring out how to Amass Power despite the Inconvenience of Elections
Of course this changed over time. Nowadays, people who pay no taxes whatsoever can vote. We’ve come a long way from Runnymede. And returned a lot of power to government. In America, about half of all people pay no federal income tax. Yet they can vote. And they do. For the party that promises them more free stuff. By taxing ‘the rich’ to pay for it. And you know what these non-taxpayers say? “Raise tax rates? Absolutely. I mean, what do I care? It’s not like I’m paying them.” I’m paraphrasing, of course. But you can see the problem.
They have no skin in the game. And the only reason they don’t is because ‘the rich’ have been keeping them down. At least that’s what they believe. Because those in power told them this. So they can keep raising taxes. And keep increasing the power of government.
It’s nothing new. There are those who just want power. Kings often took power by force. When it was clear that the rich barons were more important to the king than the king was to them, though, things changed. There were limits on absolute power. So those who coveted power had to be creative. And figure out how to amass power despite the inconvenience of elections.
Politics Today: Buy Votes with State Benefits and scare the Bejesus out of Old People
The answer was the welfare state. And class warfare. Buy votes. And demonize ‘the rich’. Get the people dependent on government. And anytime there is political opposition, tell the people that the opposition wants to cut your state benefits. To scare the people into voting for you.
We call Social Security and Medicare third-rail issues in America. Because if you threaten to cut them (i.e., touch them), you will die politically. As you would die if you touched the electrified third rail in the subway. Because the recipients of those programs live in fear of losing their benefits. And will always vote for the candidate who promises not to cut them.
And this is how you amass power when saddled with the inconvenience of elections. Buy votes with state benefits. And scare the bejesus out of old people. Telling them the political opposition wants to take your benefits away. Attack the rich. And tax them. To pay for the ever bloating welfare state.
And if at least half of the people pay no taxes, you’re golden. Because when that many people have no skin in the game, you can get away with just about anything you want.
Tags: Allies, American, aristocracy, barons, benefits, Big Government, blood and treasure, British, buy votes, class warfare, Constitution, constitutional monarchy, demonize the rich, don't pay taxes, elections, England, feudal barons, feudalism, higher tax rates, inconvenience of elections, king, King John, landed aristocracy, landowners, limited government, Magna Carta, Nazi Germany, representative government, risk, Runnymede, SHAEF, skin in the game, state benefits, tax rates, taxation, taxes, taxpayer, vote, wealth, welfare state, World War II
The Liberal Ruling Class hails from the Ivy League
Liberals hail from the Ivy League. Where they’re taught important life skills. Arrogance. Conceit. And condescension. It is here at these universities that they learn to hold everyone in contempt. Yes, there are some out there with true liberal bona fides that didn’t go to the Ivy League, but they are the exception. Not the rule. These people may bleat the liberal line as well as the Ivy Leaguer, but they are not going to ascend to the Ruling Class. And though they won’t admit it, the Ruling Class holds most of these liberals in contempt, too.
Amassing wealth and power in a few, elite hands is nothing new. Even in early America. The Planter Elite of the Deep South were a small minority of the population. But they held the wealth and power in the Deep South. And they wielded it during the Philadelphia Convention. They held the founding of the new nation hostage. Unless the land where all men were created equal had slavery there would be no new nation. So there was slavery. And the Ruling Class of the Deep South gave themselves extra political clout in the new federal government. Thanks to the Three-Fifths Compromise. The minority planter elite were able to inflate their numbers by counting 3/5 of each slave. Thus inflating their numbers in the House of Representatives.
So for the first 50 years or so of the new nation the new federal government spoke with a decidedly southern accent. And often dictated policy in the new nation. And for those 50 or so years the Deep South was happy to be part of the union. Because they sort of ran the show. Then all that immigration into the north started to change the balance of power in the House of Representatives. Which left the presidency (where they did whatever they could to make sure the president would be sympathetic to southern views and willing to compromise to save the union). And the Senate. And to maintain power in the Senate they had to hold on to slavery.
The Planter Elite used Slavery to Concentrate Wealth and Power in their Hands
The Ruling Class, the Planter Elite (approximately 5% of the Southern population), used slavery to concentrate wealth and power in their hands. It was truly an old-school aristocracy in the Deep South. The ‘landed aristocracy’ in these states owned these states. And up to the mid 19th century they took this disproportionate power to Congress. They advanced and blocked legislation to protect their slaveholding interests. To maintain their minority rule. Their power. And their wealth.
As immigration began to tip the balance of power away from them they turned their focus to the Senate. Each state got two senators. Population numbers didn’t matter. What mattered was that there wasn’t more ‘free’ states than ‘slave’ states. And that there was no prevailing antislavery sentiment. As there was throughout the northern states at the time. Not only did they eschew slavery, they weren’t even returning runaway slaves to their rightful owners. So while they could the Planter Elite would use the power of the federal government to override any state law they felt counterproductive to their interests. And dictate policy to these recalcitrant northern states.
For you see, slavery is a lot like socialism. It doesn’t work well when those trapped in it can escape it. And that was a problem for the Deep South. Their slaves were escaping to these northern states. And these uppity northern state governments refused to return this southern ‘property’. Not only were they taking a financial loss on these runaway slaves, but this northern sanctuary was encouraging more slaves to run away. This would not do. So they passed the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 compelling them to return these slaves to bondage. Or be fined and/or jailed. This did not go over well in the North. And it placed the country on the road to civil war.
The Civil War was a Battle between Privileged Aristocracy and the Equality of Self-Government
All during the run up to the Civil War, the Ruling Class, the planter elite of the Deep South, participated in the democratic process. Because for a long time they were free to dictate a lot of U.S. policy. From a stacked deck (thanks to the Three-Fifths Compromise). And repeated threats of secession if they didn’t get their way. Politicians on both sides of the slavery issue made compromise after compromise to keep the union together. But that all changed with the election of Abraham Lincoln. A Republican. Which was the party taking a moral stance on the issue of slavery. This did not bode well for the Ruling Class.
South Carolina seceded first. Then the rest followed. The planter elite in these states led their states out of the union. And into civil war. Arguing that Lincoln’s federal government was going to infringe on their states’ rights (in particular their right to continue the institution of slavery). They called it the War of Northern Aggression even though they fired the first shot at Fort Sumter in Charleston Harbor. And they told their brave soldiers to fight these Yankee invaders to protect their country (i.e., state), their families and their way of life. And they did. Some 300,000 dying in the process. But not to maintain the institution of slavery. For 95% of all Southerners didn’t own any slaves. They fought to protect their country, their families and their way of life. Most of which was a life of backbreaking labor on a small patch of land they called the family farm. That was in no way threatened by the North. But the Ruling Class lied. To protect their interests. Their wealth. And sacrificed a generation of their own people. Because to them, they were as expendable as the slaves on their plantations. Actually, they were more expendable. For Confederate soldiers didn’t show up on their balance sheets. But slaves did.
The Confederate soldier fought valiantly. But lost. In what was a battle between the Old World. And the New World. Between the privilege of aristocracy. And the equality of self-government. Between the Ruling Class. And ordinary Americans. The balance of power shifted. Away from the Deep South. But, alas, not to the people. Instead, to the North East. To the Ivy League. Where another Ruling Class would rise. And take over the reins of government. Keeping class warfare alive and well in the United States.
Tea Party Republicans are Decidedly Anti-Ruling Class
The players may change but the Ruling Class lives on. Those who feel entitled to an elevated position because of their birthright. Or wealth. Most often both. Which is what you need to get into the Ivy League. And you have to think correctly. Which isn’t too much of a problem for they make sure you do so in their curriculum. Which is heavy on liberal progressivism. And light on staying out of other people’s business.
Case in point, Obamacare. Universal health care. The holy grail of liberalism. The people didn’t want it. Based on the polling. And the town hall meetings. They didn’t want the government intruding into their health care. But they had both houses of Congress. So they could do just about anything they wanted. Dictate policy. And sneak things through in the dead of night. Which they did to make Obamacare law. Strictly along pure partisan party lines. Some of their members paid the ultimate price and lost in the following election. But they take care of their own. The Ruling Class. Though out of office, they’re never out of power.
That is until a bunch of uppity freshmen Republicans descended on Congress. Tea Party Republicans we call them. And decidedly anti-Ruling Class. And they’ve become a problem. For they won’t accept the established order. They can’t be bought. And they don’t care if they get reelected. The boobs. All they care about is keeping their campaign promises. Which is anathema to the Ruling Class.
And soon the shoe was on the other foot. The Ruling Class lost the House in the 2010 midterm election. And had to deal with obstructionism. And by obstructionism I mean responsible governing. Per the will of the people. From that contemptible Tea Party. For they are interfering with the natural order of things. That is, letting liberals do whatever they want. So now the liberals cry foul. And demand bipartisan compromise. Until they can dictate policy again. They way it should be. According to the Ruling Class.
Tags: America, anti-ruling class, aristocracy, balance of power, bipartisan, bipartisan compromise, Civil War, compromise, Congress, Deep South, dictate policy, equality of self-government, established order, federal government, freshmen Republicans, House of Representatives, institution of slavery, Ivy League, liberal ruling class, liberals, majority power, Minority rule, northern states, Obamacare, obstructionism, planter elite, power, privileged aristocracy, Republican, ruling class, secession, self-government, Senate, slavery, slaves, southerners, Tea Party, Tea Party Republicans, Three-Fifths Compromise, union, United States, Universal health care, wealth, wealth and power
The Rule of Law and Contract Rights
This is the 4th of July. A big holiday in America. In most places. It fell out of favor for awhile in Vicksburg, Mississippi, what with that city falling on the 4th during the American Civil War. Some said that the Union‘s win kept the spirit of the 4th of July alive. Many in the South said it killed it. Especially those who have reframed the Civil War as a struggle between federal power and states’ rights. And it is those who say states’ rights lost. And the spirit of 1776 died.
Of course, the Civil War wasn’t about maintaining states’ rights in the South. In fact, the South was all for a strong federal government to overrule states’ laws when it came to the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850. When northern states refused to send back escaped slaves to their southern owners, they asked for the federal government to enact a law to compel them to do so. You see, the southern planter elite (a small percentage of the southern population who owned the vast majority of the slaves) was all about making the law favor them. Much like the land-owning aristocracy had done it for centuries in feudal Europe. Which is decidedly not in keeping with the Spirit of ’76.
The American colonies had already been at war with the British Empire for about a year when Thomas Jefferson presented the Declaration of Independence to the Continental Congress. The cornerstone of that document is that all men are created equal. Endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights. Key to these rights is the Rule of Law. Simply stated, it means the new nation would be a nation of laws. Not of kings. Or an aristocracy. And the law would rule supreme. No one would be above the law. Not the planter elite. Kings. Or presidents (see Missing the Point on July 4: The Right to Vote Was Not The Main Achievement in 1776 by Warren Meyer posted 6/30/2011 on Forbes).
For about 99% of human history, political power has been exercised at the unchecked capricious whim of a few individuals. The great innovation of western countries like the US, and before it England and the Netherlands, has been to subjugate the power of government officials to the rule of law. Criminal justice, adjudication of disputes, contracts, etc. all operate based on a set of laws known to all in advance and applying equally to all.
And key to the Rule of Law are property rights and contracts.
Today the rule of law actually faces a number of threats in this country. One of the most important principles of the rule of law is that legality (and illegality) can be objectively determined in a repeatable manner from written and well-understood rules. Unfortunately, the massive regulatory and tax code structure in this country have created a set of rules that are subject to change and interpretation constantly at the whim of the regulatory body. Every day, hundreds of people and companies find themselves facing penalties due to an arbitrary interpretation of obscure regulations.
Worse, with the growing power of the Federal government, it has become an increasingly accepted practice that Congress or the President may selectively violate the rule of law to benefit their particular constituents. Just ask secured bondholders at Chrysler (who had their legal rights wiped out by executive fiat in favor or the Administration’s pet union) or restaurants burdened with Obamacare compliance (whose competitors with better political access have gotten cost-saving waivers), what they think of the rule of law.
It’s a slippery path. And it starts out small. Little losses of liberty along the way. Then the losses get bigger. With the ruling powers always justifying that it was for the greater good. Adolf Hitler rose to power through free elections. And seduced the Germans. People accepted his vision and willingly gave up their rights for the greater Germany. With Germany ultimately becoming a dictatorship.
Appealing to the greater ‘good’ is a powerful force. It just takes a good speech to get the people to willingly follow you. Such as when JFK said, “Ask not what your country can do for you – ask what you can do for your country.” You’ll be hard-pressed to find any such sentiment in any of America’s Founding Documents. Because it goes completely against the American creed. Americans don’t serve government; government serves Americans. But this sentiment has prevailed. And gave America the welfare state. An explosion in the size of government. And a loss of individual liberties ever since. All to serve a greater good. Such as when the president of the United States arbitrarily revoked the contract rights of those Chrysler bond holders. So he could reward his friends and cronies in the UAW by giving them stock shares they had no legal claim to.
The central concept on which this country was founded is that an individual’s rights do not flow from government, but are inherent to all human beings. Government in this context only legitimately exists to the extent that it is our servant in the defense of our rights, rather than as the vessel from which these rights grudgingly flow.
Statists of all stripes have tried to challenge this assumption over the last 100 years. While their exact details have varied, every statist has tried to create some larger entity to which the individual should be subjugated: the proletariat, the common good, God, society, the master race. They all hold in common that the government’s job is to sacrifice the property and well-being of one group to another in the name of some vague meta-entity.
And they’re still doing it today. But now it’s for the greatest greater good of them all. The planet itself. Without which none of us can live.
The Soothing and Incessant Whine of Renewable Energy
Renewable energy. That’s the latest tool of subjugation. We all must sacrifice. Because if we don’t, the earth won’t be long on this planet. So we’re seeing more and more wind farms. Replacing a small percentage of reliable fossil-fuel produced electricity. With a very unreliable but noisy windmill-produced electricity (see Noisy wind farm ‘drove couple out of their home’ posted 7/4/2011 on The Telegraph).
Jane and Julian Davis, moved out of Grays Farm, Deeping St Nicholas, near Spalding, Lincs, four years ago because of the strain of living with the incessant noise…
Mrs Davis, whose husband’s family cultivated Grays Farm for over 20 years before they were uprooted by the noise, said it had been a “nightmare living there”, and that they had no option but to leave.
Speaking before today’s High Court hearing, she added: “The noise is unpredictable and mainly occurs at night, you can never get to bed with the assurance that you will stay asleep…
“We want them to stop the noise so we can move back in,” she said, adding: “We want them to recognise that the noise is a nuisance so we can go back and get some rest and sleep like we did five years ago. “
You see, the problem with this couple is that they are not rich and/or famous. Therefore, they have no rights to live peacefully in their homes. Now on the other side of the pond, the rich and/or famous have fought to live peacefully in their homes. Like the Kennedys. Who are all Big Government liberals who support renewable energy. Just not in their backyard. And to date the rich and/or famous of Martha’s Vineyard have been successful in keeping windmills out of Nantucket Sound.
The Spirit of ’76
Liberal politicians and the planter elite have a lot in common. For they believe they are above the law. Yes, people should sacrifice so we can build windmills near their property. But we shouldn’t build them where the rich and/or famous sail their yachts. Because that wouldn’t be right. But writing laws that further restrict our lives while exempting themselves from those laws is perfectly fine. Again, this goes completely against the American creed. The intent of our Founding Fathers. And the Spirit of ’76. Which we should note well on this day of days. July 4. Independence Day.
Tags: 4th of July, all men are created equal, America, American colonies, American creed, aristocracy, British Empire, Continental Congress, contract rights, Declaration of Independence, founding documents, Founding Fathers, greater good, individual liberties, land-owning aristocracy, liberal politicians, liberals, liberty, planter elite, property rights, renewable energy, rule of law, Spirit of '76, Thomas Jefferson, wind farms, windmill