Chinese Women must submit to an Invasive Gynecological Exam for a Government Job

Posted by PITHOCRATES - December 1st, 2012

Week in Review

Many on the Left admire China for what they’re doing with their state-capitalism.  Something they’d like to see more of in the United States.  Government telling business what to do.  Government basically telling everyone what to do.  It’s a veritable liberal nirvana.  As long as you’re not a woman seeking a government job.  For there are a few more hoops Chinese women have to jump through before getting a coveted government job (see Chinese Students Protest ‘Invasive’ Gynecological Exams Needed For Government Jobs by Adam Taylor posted 11/28/2012 on Business Insider).

On Monday morning in Wuhan, Hubei Province, over 10 Chinese students protested the inclusion of invasive gynecological exams in the screening process for new civil service applicants, according to Legal Daily…

According to Legal Daily, one student said the manual on physical examinations for civil service recruits requires gynecological exams to diagnose sexually transmitted diseases and malignant tumors. The manual also requires information on menstrual history.

Men are not required to undergo similar examinations. Legal expert Han Guijun, an associate law professor at the Wuhan-based Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, told the paper that the practice may be against Chinese laws, and is “too invasive” for women…

According to Xinhua, around 1.12 million people took the National Public Servant Exam to become a civil servants. Only 21,000 government positions are expected to be filled this year, and the government says only 1 in 53 applicants will get a government job.

As bad as requiring women to get invasive gynecological exams these numbers are even more disturbing.  Around 1.12 million people are applying for a government job.  With only 21,000 openings that means less than 2% taking these exams will get one of these jobs.  Yet some women will endure an invasive gynecological exam for less than a 2% chance of getting a job.  Which tells you that the economy may be booming in China but the best jobs are still the government jobs in the Communist Party.  Which means all of that great economic growth can’t be all that great.  Not if people would rather work for the government than in the quasi private sector.  For government workers probably don’t have to live like a factory worker.  In a factory dorm a short walk from their workstation in that factory.

This is why China has the growth they do.  And why the U.S. cannot compete against their manufacturing base.  For instead of unions with costly pension and health care benefits they have workers living in onsite dormitories.  While the most ambitious people, those who can score the highest on those civil service exams, and the women with the cleanest uteruses, don’t settle for the factory jobs.  No.  They want those cushy government jobs.  Even if it means enduring an invasive gynecological exam.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , ,

U.S. Tax Dollars being Invested to Create Jobs in China

Posted by PITHOCRATES - December 1st, 2012

Week in Review

The U.S. government bailed out GM.  Instead of letting them go through a normal bankruptcy proceeding that would make GM competitive again so they could sell cars in the U.S. again.  Instead, the government gave GM taxpayer money to fund their pension and retiree health care costs.  Which will do nothing to improve their competitiveness.  Or create new jobs in the U.S.  So what will that massive government investment do for GM?  Allow them to expand and create jobs…in China (see GM Chinese venture to build $1 billion plant in Chongqing by Ben Klayman posted 11/28/2012 on Reuters).

General Motors Co (GM.N) and its Chinese joint-venture partners said on Wednesday they plan to build a $1 billion auto assembly plant in the city of Chongqing as the GM group bids to remain the leader in the world’s largest auto market…

Earlier this month, GM and its Chinese partners opened a plant in the southern city of Liuzhou for its low-cost Baojun brand. That plant will also eventually have an annual production capacity of 400,000 vehicles…

In September, GM opened a large vehicle test track west of Shanghai. GM and its partners invested $252 million to build what officials called the country’s largest proving ground.

In addition to Liuzhou, the joint venture currently operates a plant in Qingdao. GM and SAIC, through a different joint venture, also have a plant in Shanghai, and several more in northeast China.

This is not helping the U.S. economy.  Building plants and creating jobs in China.  All this is doing is allowing GM to make money like Wall Street makes money.  By investing money.  And getting a return on their Chinese investments.  Government Motors, I mean, General Motors is doing the very thing the Democrats hammered Mitt Romney for doing during the 2012 election.  Creating jobs in China.  The only difference, of course, is that Romney didn’t use U.S. tax money to create any of his jobs.

So the government bailout of General Motors didn’t help anyone but the UAW whose high costs were making them uncompetitive (the source of all of GM’s problems).  And the Chinese.  It didn’t create any new jobs in America.  And it didn’t help GM become more competitive.  Forcing them to rely on their Chinese job growth because their cost structure just won’t let them sell more cars or add more jobs in the United States.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Obamacare to Penalize Hospitals for Readmitting Sick People

Posted by PITHOCRATES - December 1st, 2012

Week in Review

Now that we passed Obamacare we’re starting to find out what was in that bill.  Which, according to Nancy Pelosi, was the only way for us to find out what was in it.  By voting blindly for it.  Then wait for them to implement it.  They’re doing that now.  And some of the things that we’re learning are in the bill are a little scary (see Hospitals Face Pressure From Medicare to Avert Readmissions (from the New York Times) by JORDAN RAU posted 11/26/2012 on The New York Times).

Medicare last month began levying financial penalties against 2,217 hospitals it says have had too many readmissions. Of those hospitals, 307 will receive the maximum punishment, a 1 percent reduction in Medicare’s regular payments for every patient over the next year, federal records show.

One of those is Barnes-Jewish Hospital in St. Louis, which will lose $2 million this year. Dr. John Lynch, the chief medical officer, said Barnes-Jewish could absorb that loss this year, but “over time, if the penalties accumulate, it will probably take resources away from other key patient programs.”

The crackdown on readmissions is at the vanguard of the Affordable Care Act’s effort to eliminate unnecessary care and curb Medicare’s growing spending, which reached $556 billion this year. Hospital inpatient costs make up a quarter of that spending and are projected to grow by more than 4 percent annually in coming years, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

There are two ways to look at this.  The government’s way.  Keeping those greedy hospitals from readmitting patients just to bill the government more.  Or the patients’ way.  Seeing Obamacare forcing hospitals not to readmit sick people.  Which would be basically the same as telling them to go and die.  It’s not called a death panel.  But someone in the hospital will have to decide whether to readmit the patient and suffer financial consequences.  Or please the government and not readmit these people.  Which, of course, would be a decision probably resulting in death for these patients.  Not the warm and cuddly Obamacare they told us about.  But it would be the only way the government could reduce health care costs.  Simply refusing to give people medical care.  For death is cheaper in the long run than hospitalization.  Something no doubt the government bureaucrats have factored in their Obamacare.

Medicare’s tough love is not going over well everywhere. Academic medical centers are complaining that the penalties do not take into account the extra challenges posed by extremely sick and low-income patients. For these people, getting medicine and follow-up care can be a struggle…

Various studies, including one commissioned by Medicare, have found that the hospitals with the most poor and African-American patients tended to have higher readmission rates than hospitals with more affluent and Caucasian patients…

Some researchers fear the Medicare penalties are so steep, they will distract hospitals from other pressing issues, like reducing infections and surgical mistakes and ensuring patients’ needs are met promptly. “It should not be our top priority,” said Dr. Ashish Jha, a professor at the Harvard School of Public Health who has studied readmissions. “If you think of all the things in the Affordable Care Act, this is the one that has the biggest penalties, and that’s just crazy.”

Interesting.  Not only does Obamacare use death as a cost-cutting means it also will discriminate against the poor and minorities.  While at the same time making hospitals less safe as money will go to the government in fines instead of combating infections and preventing surgical mistakes.

Death panels and less safe hospitals.  Funny, I don’t recall them telling us this is what they were giving us Obamacare.  Then again, if they told the truth they probably wouldn’t have gotten the votes.  So health care will get incredibly worse.  These policies and our aging population will accelerate our once quality health care system to something akin to what we could find in a third world country.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

The Democrats oppose an Energy Boom as it could Reduce their Political Power in the Big Cities

Posted by PITHOCRATES - December 1st, 2012

Week in Review

President Obama’s energy policy has only hindered oil production and raised gasoline prices.  Exploration and production are soaring.  But only on private land.  Any land that requires a federal permit is not booming with activity.

Despite the high gasoline prices and the poor economy President Obama won reelection.  In large part thanks to those states with the big metropolitan cities.  Those cities that border the heartland.  Or flyover country as those on the left call it.  Those cities that concentrate wealth.  Have massive public sectors.  And large social safety nets.  Funded by that concentrated wealth.  So people in the big cities approve of an expanding welfare state.  And have the population to turn out on election night to keep that welfare state expanding.  For awhile, at least (see Oil, gas boom lifts personal income in USA by Dennis Cauchon posted 11/27/2012 on USA Today)

The nation’s oil and gas boom is driving up income so fast in a few hundred small towns and rural areas that it’s shifting prosperity to the nation’s heartland, a USA TODAY analysis of government data shows…

Small-town prosperity is most noticeable in North Dakota, now the nation’s No. 2 oil-producing state. Six of the top 10 counties are above the state’s Bakken oil field.

Could this be the reason why the president’s energy policies hinder exploration and production?  To keep people and wealth out of the heartland?  Where they tend to vote conservative?  Perhaps.  For the last thing the Democrats want is for people to leave the big cities for good jobs in the private sector.  Where they live well thanks to jobs in the energy industry that the president’s base wants to regulate out of business.  So, no, an energy boom in the heartland would not benefit the Democrats.  It would shift the demographics away from their strongholds.  And into flyover country.  Favoring conservatives.

Just something to think about the next time you’re expressing dissatisfaction over the high price of gasoline.  That it would benefit the Democrats not to have good, high-paying jobs that could reduce the price of gasoline.  And their political power in the big cities that help them carry elections.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Almost two-thirds of British Adults say Students need to Study Christianity in the Public Schools

Posted by PITHOCRATES - December 1st, 2012

Week in Review

The U.S Constitution forbids the government from establishing a religion.  Or interfering with a state’s religious business.  For if a state wanted to establish the Catholic religion that was their business.  Not the federal government’s.  If a state wanted to establish the Protestant religion that was their business.   Not the federal government’s.  If a state wanted to establish the Calvinist religion that was their business.  Not the federal government’s.  So the Americans distanced themselves from the Church of England.  But most Americans were still practicing Christians.  Like the English.  So they didn’t stray far from the mother country in their religion (see Teaching of Christianity ‘lacks intellectual development’ by Judith Burns posted 11/27/2012 on BBC News Education & Family).

Almost two-thirds (64%) of adults questioned for Oxford University agreed pupils must know about Christianity to understand English history.

Absolutely.  There is a reason why European nations became the dominant world powers following the Mediterranean empires.  Christians brought back the great books of knowledge from libraries around the Mediterranean.  Christian monks translated these books.  And while they used the knowledge in these books to advance the European nations Christian values settled Europeans into a common, Christian people.  European kings exercised moral restraint in deference to Christian virtue.  At least they tried to look as if they were.  For they did not want to be excommunicated from the Church.  Cities grew where people lived peacefully together.  Commerce and trade flourished.  Making Portugal, Spain, France, the Netherlands and England rich and powerful nations.

And then England rose above them all.   Thanks to English common law.  Representative government.  Laissez faire capitalism.  And Christian virtue that made good leaders.  And honest people.  They weren’t perfect.  But it was that combination that made the British Empire.  Which gave us some of our greatest countries.  Australia and New Zealand down under.  Canada and the United States up on the other side of the globe.  And other countries scattered across the globe.  Sure, some will say they oppressed and conquered people.  But as far as oppressors and conquerors went they weren’t all that bad.  For life under British rule sure was better than life under other conquerors and oppressors throughout most of history.  For anyone who had a choice to pick their conqueror who do you think they would choose?  An Islamist conqueror?  A communist conqueror?  A Nazi conqueror?  A Mongol conqueror?  Or a British conqueror?  Most would probably choose a British conqueror.  During World War II the worst Nazis fought hard to surrender in the West.  To become a prisoner of the British or the Americans.  For being their prisoner was going to be far better than being a Soviet prisoner.  A country they brutally raped and pillaged.  An atheist, communist nation that had no Christian qualms about exacting their revenge.

It is Christianity that made Europe different.  And it is Christianity that made England great.  For it was Christianity that softened the brutal hand of power.  Emphasizing that we are all God’s children.  Urging us to extend Christian charity to our brothers.  They didn’t do that in Eastern Europe under Soviet rule.  Where the people did not embrace their forced socialism.  They tried hard to escape it.  And many who saw no hope of escaping it committed suicide.  The number one and two countries for suicide in Europe were Hungary and East Germany.  Which is why the West won the Cold War.  For life behind the Iron Curtain was wretched.  Where there were no moral restraints on the state.  Who tortured and abused their people at will.  Leaving people broken, frightened and despondent.  Which did not help the state provide for her people.  Instead everyone did the minimum to escape the brutal oppression of the state.  And tried to be as invisible as possible.  For if you drew too much attention onto yourself the state may just round you up for questioning.  This is why East Germany did not produce a Steve Jobs.  There was no reward for taking such great risks of bringing government scrutiny on every aspect of your life.  It was easier and safer to sweep floors than create new technology.

We can trace back some of the finest institutions free people enjoy everywhere to that country that adopted Christianity as their state established religion.  For Christ is the Prince of Peace.  And you want your rulers to favor peace over brutality.  Not warrior kings bent on world conquest.  Who rule by force and intimidation.  With absolute power and no moral restraint.  No.  That’s not what you want.  You want a ruler who lives by the Golden Rule.  Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.  The kind of thing that made England great.  As well as the nations she gave us.

www.PITHOCRATES.com

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,